Re: Bug#132542: sysvinit: please make /etc/init.d/rcS a conffile

2019-02-02 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
Thorsten Glaser: > Just accept that this idea, originating from the systemd people at Fedora/Freedesktop, is NOT welcome to classical Unix people. Ahem! We classical Unix people experienced this idea in the late 1980s, from where it *really* originated, Sun and AT *

Bug#132542: Info received (Bug#132542: sysvinit: please make /etc/init.d/rcS a conffile)

2019-02-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding this Bug report. This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message has been received. Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other interested parties for their attention

Re: Debian Bug Squashing Party (BSP) in Venlo, the Netherlands, 12 and 13 January 2018

2019-01-27 Thread Joost van Baal-Ilić
Hi, The Debian Bug Squashing Party earlier this month in Venlo, Netherlands was productive and fun. Thanks a lot to Transceptor Technology, part of the insign.it Group, for hosting[1] us, sponsoring food and being very hospitable (you might know this company as the people behind the SiriDB[2

Re: report bug

2019-01-25 Thread Celejar
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:59:16 + Paul Sutton wrote: > Hi > > I have set up report-bug however upon running I am informs me that  > gir1.2-vte-2.91 >  is missing, this is required to run the program with the GUI.  > > I have no problem installing this (and have don

report bug

2019-01-25 Thread Paul Sutton
Hi I have set up report-bug however upon running I am informs me that  gir1.2-vte-2.91  is missing, this is required to run the program with the GUI.  I have no problem installing this (and have done) but just thought I would mention it.  report bug defaults to the CLI version anyway. Paul

Help filing a bug report

2019-01-23 Thread Chris Talbot
s behavior. As this is a rather odd bug, I am unsure how to gather more information, nor am I sure what is causing it, as I have a feeling that it is a compilation of issues. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you! Respectfully, Chris Talbot

Re: Apt bug & redirects

2019-01-23 Thread Curt
On 2019-01-23, Richard Hector wrote: > > Ok, it seems if I go through the list on the dsa page above, I can then > download the packages from their respective pages on > packages.debian.org, where they're listed along with checksums. Tedious, > but should work :-) > > Richard > > Not certain why

Bug In Unknown Package

2019-01-22 Thread Cole Creps
Hello, I recently upgraded to Debian Buster and now experience severe graphical lag(10-15FPS on a blank desktop, less with a window open according to KDE's built in FPS monitor) after resuming from suspend.  Reportbug said to contact this address because I don't know which package is causing

Re: Apt bug & redirects

2019-01-22 Thread Richard Hector
On 23/01/19 5:05 PM, Richard Hector wrote: > Hi all, > > I just read about the current apt security update on The Register: > > https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/01/22/debian_package_manager_flaws/ > > It suggests running apt update with redirects disallowed ... but > security.debian.org

Apt bug & redirects

2019-01-22 Thread Richard Hector
Hi all, I just read about the current apt security update on The Register: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/01/22/debian_package_manager_flaws/ It suggests running apt update with redirects disallowed ... but security.debian.org appears to do a redirect. There's a tip at

Debian Bug Squashing Party (BSP) in Gothenburg, Sweden - 7 April 2019

2019-01-16 Thread Chris Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Debian Bug Squashing Party (BSP) in Gothenburg, Sweden - 7 April 2019 = I am very happy to invite you to a Debian Bug Squashing Party in Gothenburg, Sweden, on Sunday April 7th

Debian Bug Squashing Party (BSP) in Gothenburg, Sweden - 7 April 2019

2019-01-16 Thread Chris Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Debian Bug Squashing Party (BSP) in Gothenburg, Sweden - 7 April 2019 = I am very happy to invite you to a Debian Bug Squashing Party in Gothenburg, Sweden, on Sunday April 7th

Re: Em podeu donar un cop de ma amb un bug?

2019-01-14 Thread Robert Marsellés
El 12/1/19 a les 12:40, a...@probeta.net ha escrit: > Bon dia a tothom, > > Fa molt de temps que em barallo amb un bug, que intento acorralar, però > no hi ha manera. > > Afecta a Debian Testing en el sistema gràfic, i aquí em veig molt > perdut, entre controladors, s

Re: Em podeu donar un cop de ma amb un bug?

2019-01-14 Thread Ernest Adrogué
Àlex writes: > Sí així vaig fer. Vaig descarregar el nucli 4.9 de la Debian estable i > el vaig instal.lar, i quan vull veure vídeo arrenco amb aquest nucli. > Des de la versió 4.14 a la 4.19 la cosa ha anat malament i no sé si amb > el temps es corregirà, però sempre puc canviar de hardware

Re: Em podeu donar un cop de ma amb un bug?

2019-01-14 Thread Eduard Selma
El 14/1/19 a les 13:09, Àlex ha escrit: El teu hardware gràfic és Radeon? - Sí, és el AMD/ATI Richland (Radeon HD 8670D). Està integrat amb la CPU: Quad Core AMD A10-6800K, és el que anomenen APU. Deu ser del 2013 o 14, tecnologia de 32 nm. Res de darrera generació. Evidenment, és un model

Re: Em podeu donar un cop de ma amb un bug?

2019-01-14 Thread Àlex
El 12/1/19 a les 18:33, Eduard Selma ha escrit: > El 12/1/19 a les 12:40, a...@probeta.net ha escrit: >> Bon dia a tothom, >> >> Fa molt de temps que em barallo amb un bug, que intento acorralar, >> però no hi ha manera. >> >> Afecta a Debian Testing en

Re: Em podeu donar un cop de ma amb un bug?

2019-01-14 Thread Àlex
> Pel que dius, semblaria un problema del compositor, que no actualitza > l'estat de la pantalla correctament. Ara bé, si et passa amb Gnome i > també amb Xfce, que utilitzen compositors diferents, aleshores m'inclino > a pensar que és una altra cosa. Sí, i amb Gnome amb Xorg es congelava tot

Re: Em podeu donar un cop de ma amb un bug?

2019-01-13 Thread Ernest Adrogué
L+ALT+F7 > > No sé ni per on començar. Algun consell? Els problemes que tenen a veure amb el sistema gràfic són difícils de solucionar pel teu compte, a no ser que siguis un expert en el tema. Si el bug és reproduïble (és a dir es produeix sempre que fas alguna cosa concreta), pots anar pr

Re: Em podeu donar un cop de ma amb un bug?

2019-01-12 Thread Eduard Selma
El 12/1/19 a les 12:40, a...@probeta.net ha escrit: Bon dia a tothom, Fa molt de temps que em barallo amb un bug, que intento acorralar, però no hi ha manera. Afecta a Debian Testing en el sistema gràfic, i aquí em veig molt perdut, entre controladors, servidors de finestres, gestors de

Re: Em podeu donar un cop de ma amb un bug?

2019-01-12 Thread alex
Fins al nucli 4.13 tot anava bé, però en actualitzar al nucli 4.14 l’escriptori Gnome es «congelava» cada pocs minuts. A tots els següents nuclis fins el 4.19 el problema persisteix. A aquest enllaç hi ha els canvis que aporta el nucli 4.14 a Radeon, però no els sé interpretar:

Em podeu donar un cop de ma amb un bug?

2019-01-12 Thread alex
Bon dia a tothom, Fa molt de temps que em barallo amb un bug, que intento acorralar, però no hi ha manera. Afecta a Debian Testing en el sistema gràfic, i aquí em veig molt perdut, entre controladors, servidors de finestres, gestors de finestres, compositors, mesas, cairos, egl, etc. Si

Bug regarding audio in "stable" branch

2019-01-06 Thread Jul'
afterwards); it is important to note that it does not happen after every boot) - I do not know whether it can be linked to GNOME or any other package down to pulseaudio - I do not know which details could be useful ; I would be happy to submit a much more detailed bug report as soon as I know how I

Re: digikam: does it make sense to report a bug already fixed upstream but not in debian?

2019-01-06 Thread Andrea Borgia
Il 06/01/19 12:41, Étienne Mollier ha scritto: Since you can reproduce the bug in Debian, I guess it is worth a report, with a mention to the upstream bug page and, if possible the patch fixing it. Put information necessary to the context, but no need to copy the entire thread on KDE bug

Re: digikam: does it make sense to report a bug already fixed upstream but not in debian?

2019-01-06 Thread Étienne Mollier
On 1/6/19 12:26 PM, Andrea Borgia wrote: > Hi. > > Case in point: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395875 > > There is no corresponding bugreport for the Debian package; had I not found > the upstream bug, I would have filed a report with nearly the same > information,

digikam: does it make sense to report a bug already fixed upstream but not in debian?

2019-01-06 Thread Andrea Borgia
Hi. Case in point: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395875 There is no corresponding bugreport for the Debian package; had I not found the upstream bug, I would have filed a report with nearly the same information, since my tests match the issue perfectly. Question is, for tracking

Possible bug: "safely remove drive" freeze the system

2018-12-13 Thread Daniele Gervasoni
Hello, I have the issue in the subject when a right click on a USB drive and click on "safely remove drive". I am on Debian 9.6 with gnome. It happen with different drives and different usb ports. Looking on the www it was an old 2.6 kernel bug. Below hostnamectl output concerning ar

Re: How do I report a bug to Debian? ... as ReportBug has bugs.

2018-12-06 Thread John Hasler
Howard writes: > The URL for the Debian Bug project apparently isn't working or has > changed.  I've found two links that are not working.  The first one is > here in ReportBug, where the blue link for "Homepage of reportbug > project" is broken.  (The yellow tool tip s

Re: How do I report a bug to Debian? ... as ReportBug has bugs.

2018-12-06 Thread john doe
On 12/6/2018 8:22 AM, Howard Johnson wrote: > Aloha, > > The URL for the Debian Bug project apparently isn't working or has > changed.  I've found two links that are not working.  The first one is > here in ReportBug, where the blue link for "Homepage of reportbug

Re: ajuda reportar bug letsencrypt (systemd) - [Off-topic]

2018-12-06 Thread cubells
El 5/12/18 a les 16:37, Alex Muntada ha escrit: ... > > * [0] https://bugs.debian.org/810216 > * [1] https://bugs.debian.org/902620 Àlex: ja estàs completament dins de Matrix, comptes ja basat en zero[1] : * [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-based_numbering#In_computer_programming

How do I report a bug to Debian? ... as ReportBug has bugs.

2018-12-06 Thread Howard Johnson
Aloha, The URL for the Debian Bug project apparently isn't working or has changed.  I've found two links that are not working.  The first one is here in ReportBug, where the blue link for "Homepage of reportbug project" is broken.  (The yellow tool tip shows the bad URL being trie

Re: ajuda reportar bug letsencrypt (systemd)

2018-12-05 Thread Alex Muntada
i explicant-ho, que també tanca un bug al respecte demanant més detalls: https://salsa.debian.org/letsencrypt-team/certbot/certbot/blob/master/debian/certbot.cron.d https://bugs.debian.org/908841 Salut, Alex -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Alex Muntada ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ Debian Developer - log.alexm.org

Re: ajuda reportar bug letsencrypt (systemd)

2018-12-05 Thread Pedro
Hola Narcís, inline: On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 3:54 PM Narcis Garcia wrote: > > Amb "systemctl status certbot" veuràs que se t'ha disparat el mateix > dia. Això vol dir que és un servei que fa una tasca (one-shot) i s'atura > fins el següent torn, que no sé si són una o dues vegades al dia. OK,

Re: ajuda reportar bug letsencrypt (systemd)

2018-12-05 Thread Pedro
Crec que continua sent un bug perquè està duplicat en cron i en systemd, perquè no avisa, és a dir: mal muntat en general, lo qual les modificacions per una banda i no l'altre no es propaguen bé. Però el meu problema sembla que ja està resolt! Gràcies! Pedro [1] # cat /lib/systemd/system

ajuda reportar bug letsencrypt (systemd)

2018-12-05 Thread guifipedro
Hola, Crec que letsencrypt té un bug per com està empaquetat a debian Acostumo a treure els permisos de root a letsencrypt (i fer-ho amb un usuari dedicat), això implica que al meu /etc/cron.d/certbot [1] l'executa l'usuari letsencrypt enlloc de root que intel·ligentment m'avisa si el vull

Re: I'd like help reporting an anomaly/bug with wifi and NetworkManager under Buster

2018-12-04 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 09:41:21 -0600 craig macdonald wrote: > Hello all, > > I've discovered a small bug in linux (wifi?) networking, but I haven't > been able to report it because I don't seem to know the correct package > to report the bug against. > > I bought an older

Re: I'd like help reporting an anomaly/bug with wifi and NetworkManager under Buster

2018-12-03 Thread Reco
Hi. Here, at debian-user, we reply to the list so the whole community would benefit from the answers. Writing to a list participant directly can be OK as long as something private is discussed. Which is clearly not the case here. On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 01:26:10PM -0600, craig macdonald

Re: I'd like help reporting an anomaly/bug with wifi and NetworkManager under Buster

2018-12-03 Thread Reco
Hi. On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 09:41:21AM -0600, craig macdonald wrote: > Hello all, > > I've discovered a small bug in linux (wifi?) networking, but I haven't > been able to report it because I don't seem to know the correct > package to report the bug against. Actually yo

I'd like help reporting an anomaly/bug with wifi and NetworkManager under Buster

2018-12-03 Thread craig macdonald
Hello all, I've discovered a small bug in linux (wifi?) networking, but I haven't been able to report it because I don't seem to know the correct package to report the bug against. I bought an older, "obsolete" usb wifi adapter (D-Link DWA-130, Rev. F) after reading of the difficul

[SOLVED] Re: Buster: Kvirc: Bug 908420: Am I the only one who's having this issue?

2018-11-29 Thread local10
fig/KVIrc and try to load this > one configuration directory instead? > I actually noticed it too and tried the trick with renaming directories before I filed the bug, it did not work for me. Now trying different things I found the winning combination I think that solves the issue: 1. Rename &q

Re: Buster: Kvirc: Bug 908420: Am I the only one who's having this issue?

2018-11-29 Thread Étienne Mollier
local10, on 2018-11-29: > Nov 27, 2018, 7:24 PM by loca...@tutanota.com: > > Am I the only one who's having this issue? It's kind of > > annoying and there's no response from the maintenance team: > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908420 &g

Re: Buster: Kvirc: Bug 908420: Am I the only one who's having this issue?

2018-11-29 Thread local10
Nov 27, 2018, 7:24 PM by loca...@tutanota.com: > Am I the only one who's having this issue? It's kind of annoying and there's > no response from the maintenance team: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908420 > <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep

Buster: Kvirc: Bug 908420: Am I the only one who's having this issue?

2018-11-27 Thread local10
Hi, Am I the only one who's having this issue? It's kind of annoying and there's no response from the maintenance team: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908420 <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908420> Regards,

Re: Possible BUG: Unable to change the ip of network interfaces without reboot in text mode

2018-11-23 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:39:48AM -0200, Luciano Andress Martini wrote: > 2- Try to change the ip in /etc/network/interfaces > 3- Run ifdown enp0s3 > 4- Run ifup enp0s3 Perhaps you want to do it this way instead: 2- ifdown enp0s3 3- edit /etc/network/interfaces 4- ifup enp0s3

Possible BUG: Unable to change the ip of network interfaces without reboot in text mode

2018-11-23 Thread Luciano Andress Martini
I am not sure if my answers are reaching the users because i did not received it back so sorry to creating a new thread, but i think this is very important, please follow this steps to emulate it: 1- Install Debian 9.6 without graphical interface. 2- Try to change the ip in

Re: IT IS A BUG -- Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-11-05 Thread Curt
On 2018-11-05, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > In this case, he probably "told it to run in a terminal", and whether > the terminal uses a login shell or not is irrelevant. The fact that > now it's running the program inside a terminal (or possibly a terminal > plus a shell), instead of directly

Re: IT IS A BUG -- Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-11-05 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 12:31:11PM +, Andy Smith wrote: > - You have a launcher file that references an executable. In normal > cases calling the launcher from your desktop environment (I don't > know if this is by menu or button or something else) causes the > binary to run. I'm

Re: IT IS A BUG -- Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-11-05 Thread Andy Smith
you so it would be a lot of work to try this out. I'm only trying to help you file the right bug against the right software, but if that is not welcome just say so and I am happy to leave you to it. If I understand correctly: - You have a launcher file that references an executable. In normal

Re: IT IS A BUG -- Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-11-05 Thread Richard Owlett
On 11/04/2018 07:34 AM, Andy Smith wrote: On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 07:24:04AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: Turns out there was a *YUCKY* choice for a default setting. In the default profile for mate-terminal there is a choice titled "Run command as a login shell". The option is *not*

Re: IT IS A BUG -- Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-11-04 Thread Andy Smith
have spewed some error into some log file, but did not pop up a dialog saying "That isn't a valid binary" or whatever. I don't think that you would get different results no matter what setting you had for running terminals as login or not. So if it bothers you that trying to execute g

IT IS A BUG -- Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-11-04 Thread Richard Owlett
. A custom MATE launcher pointed the corrupted file. When the launcher icon was clicked there was no response whatsoever. Including *NO ERROR MESSAGE* Is this a bug or a feature? If a feature, why? Turns out there was a *YUCKY* choice for a default setting. In the default profile for mate-terminal

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Curt
On 2018-10-31, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> Due a non-reproducible sequence of events, a binary executable was over >> >> written by the contents of a man page in pure text format. >> > >> > Just to (maybe?) help with the proper focus, was this a human error or >> > something that

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Richard Owlett
ailed PEBKAC ;< " Ok, then, it doesn't seem to indicate a disk problem (as some seemed to suspect). Reco's comment that it could be a "(mis)feature" and Greg's response led me to investigate further. I'm personally convinced there is a bug having some aspects of being a "c

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread rhkramer
On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 11:45:15 AM Richard Owlett wrote: > On 10/31/2018 10:31 AM, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 31, 2018 10:14:40 AM Richard Owlett wrote: > >> Debian 9.1 with MATE installed from DVD set. > >> > >> Due a non-reproducible sequence of events, a binary

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Richard Owlett
ncher pointed the corrupted file. When the launcher icon was clicked there was no response whatsoever. Including *NO ERROR MESSAGE* Is this a bug or a feature? If a feature, why?

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread rhkramer
nse whatsoever. > Including *NO ERROR MESSAGE* > Is this a bug or a feature? > If a feature, why?

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Richard Owlett
ver. Including *NO ERROR MESSAGE* Is this a bug or a feature? If a feature, why? A (mis)feature. Any executable text file without defined shebang is a shell script. In this case - a syntactically invalid shell script. So it can be executed, but the child shell will exit immediately. I thin

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 31 October 2018 10:39:17 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Wednesday 31 October 2018 10:31:40 Reco wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 09:29:52AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > On 10/31/2018 09:18 AM, Curt wrote: > > > > On 2018-10-31, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > >

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Curt
d file. >>> When the launcher icon was clicked there was no response whatsoever. >>> Including *NO ERROR MESSAGE* >>> Is this a bug or a feature? >>> If a feature, why? >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- When you have fever you are heavy and light, you are small and swollen, you climb endlessly a ladder which turns like a wheel. --Jean Rhys, Voyage in the Dark

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 05:27:58PM +0300, Reco wrote: > A (mis)feature. Any executable text file without defined shebang is a > shell script. Not quite. An attempt to execute a file that doesn't have a valid magic number in the first few bytes triggers an ENOEXEC from the execve(2) call. If this

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 31 October 2018 10:31:40 Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 09:29:52AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > On 10/31/2018 09:18 AM, Curt wrote: > > > On 2018-10-31, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > Debian 9.1 with MATE installed from DVD set. > > > > > > > > Due a

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Gene Heskett
On Wednesday 31 October 2018 10:31:40 Reco wrote: > Hi. > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 09:29:52AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > On 10/31/2018 09:18 AM, Curt wrote: > > > On 2018-10-31, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > Debian 9.1 with MATE installed from DVD set. > > > > > > > > Due a

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Reco
Hi. On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 09:29:52AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 10/31/2018 09:18 AM, Curt wrote: > > On 2018-10-31, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > Debian 9.1 with MATE installed from DVD set. > > > > > > Due a non-reproducible sequence of events, a binary executable was over > > >

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Richard Owlett
launcher pointed the corrupted file. When the launcher icon was clicked there was no response whatsoever. Including *NO ERROR MESSAGE* Is this a bug or a feature? If a feature, why?

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Reco
wn > reason, the > resulting file was tagged as executable. Replace your HDD today, don't give it another chance to corrupt your data. > A custom MATE launcher pointed the corrupted file. > When the launcher icon was clicked there was no response whatsoever. > Including *NO ERROR MESSAGE* &

Re: Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Curt
utable. I want to predict immediately that this can of worms will produce the longest thread in the history of debian user. > A custom MATE launcher pointed the corrupted file. > When the launcher icon was clicked there was no response whatsoever. > Including *NO ERROR MESSAGE* >

Strangeness when binary executable overwritten by text -- bug or feature?

2018-10-31 Thread Richard Owlett
. When the launcher icon was clicked there was no response whatsoever. Including *NO ERROR MESSAGE* Is this a bug or a feature? If a feature, why?

Re: bug a l'X session?

2018-10-22 Thread Ernest Adrogué
Alex Muntada writes: > Anava a suggerir-te que per aquestes coses provis el shellcheck > però veig que la recomanació que dóna és diferent: > > In gpg-tty.sh line 2: > export GPG_TTY=$(tty) >^-- SC2155: Declare and assign separately to avoid masking return > values. > > No tinc clar si

Re: bug a l'X session?

2018-10-21 Thread Alex Muntada
Hola Ernest, > Sí, era aquesta línia: > > export GPG_TTY=$(tty) > > ... > > La solució és posar-ho entre cometes > > export GPG_TTY="$(tty)" Anava a suggerir-te que per aquestes coses provis el shellcheck però veig que la recomanació que dóna és diferent: In gpg-tty.sh line 2: export

Re: bug a l'X session?

2018-10-21 Thread Ernest Adrogué
Antoni Villalonga writes: > Em sembla que alguna comanda dona un error i aquest s'acaba parsejant > malament, resultant un error extrany. Sí, era aquesta línia: export GPG_TTY=$(tty) L'ordre tty tornava el text "no és un tty", de manera que després de la substitució quedava export GPG_TTY=no

Re: bug a l'X session?

2018-10-18 Thread Antoni Villalonga
Hola, Em sembla que alguna comanda dona un error i aquest s'acaba parsejant malament, resultant un error extrany. També podries provar un altre wm. Això pot servir com a wm dummy. Si aguanta 30 segons sense tornar al gestor de sessions #!/usr/bin/env bash sleep 30 Més facil és instalar un

Re: bug a l'X session?

2018-10-17 Thread Ernest Adrogué
Hola, tictacbum writes: > que hi tens a la línia 43 del /etc/X11/Xsession? al meu hi tinc un > comentari, per això m'estranya que et salti a aquesta línia Sí, hi ha un comentari. És l'Xsession de Debian, no l'he tocat. Diria que el número de línia no és fiable, perquè l'Xsession afegeix

Re: bug a l'X session?

2018-10-17 Thread tictacbum
Hola Ernest, que hi tens a la línia 43 del /etc/X11/Xsession? al meu hi tinc un comentari, per això m'estranya que et salti a aquesta línia has provat de comentar tot el de .environment excepte l'export LANG="ca_ES.UTF-8" i provar d'entrar a veure si peta? salut! Lluís Missatge de Ernest Adrogué

bug a l'X session?

2018-10-17 Thread Ernest Adrogué
Hola, Si intento entrar amb el login gràfic lightdm, surt immediatament i em torna a la pantalla de login. Al fitxer .xsession-errors hi ha les següents línies dbus-update-activation-environment: setting DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS=unix:path=/run/user/1000/bus

Re: Unable To Determine Proper Package For BUG

2018-10-15 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
ruption. next->prev should be prev > (0533875c), but was c2b0df70. (next=c2b0df70). > [ 6787.703475] [ cut here ] > [ 6787.703477] kernel BUG at > /build/linux-43CEzF/linux-4.16.12/lib/list_debug.c:25! > [ 6787.703578] invalid opcode:

Unable To Determine Proper Package For BUG

2018-10-15 Thread Jeff Rickman
I have a syslog capture of a BUG that I seem to routinely hit under specific circumstances. I have other details that might be of interest to whomever is interested in this BUG. For example, this is a fully updated Debian "buster" system with a ext4 (OS) and ZFS (storage array) f

Re: openssl 1.1.1-1: bug?

2018-10-05 Thread Reco
Hi. On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 12:41:44PM +0200, Pétùr wrote: > Hi, > > I cannot connect to WPA2 Entreprise network (PEAP + MSCHAPv2) with > openssl 1.1.1-1 (in sid today). I can connect 1.1.0f-3+deb9u2 version > (stable). > > Is it a bug in openssl 1.1.1-1 or some ki

openssl 1.1.1-1: bug?

2018-10-05 Thread Pétùr
Hi, I cannot connect to WPA2 Entreprise network (PEAP + MSCHAPv2) with openssl 1.1.1-1 (in sid today). I can connect 1.1.0f-3+deb9u2 version (stable). Is it a bug in openssl 1.1.1-1 or some kind of incompatibility between openssl 1.1.1-1 and my radius server? The error log with the 1.1.1-1

Re: Cannot update the Debian bug 896911

2018-09-14 Thread Brian
iled. > > > > Would you please help me take a look? > > > > --Error Details-- > > > > Reported error: > > > > > > > > /550 5.0.350 Remote server returned an error -> 550 Unknown or archived bug/ > >

Re: Cannot update the Debian bug 896911

2018-09-14 Thread Brian
On Fri 14 Sep 2018 at 21:29:41 +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: [snip] > So if you do not feel entitled (or are not allowed) to send the > "unarchive" command, then consider to contact Ben Hutchings and to ask > about the forth-and-back in that bug. Nobody is disallowed from

Re: Cannot update the Debian bug 896911

2018-09-14 Thread Richard Owlett
Remote server returned an error -> 550 Unknown or archived bug/ DSN generated by: BYAPR05MB4613.namprd05.prod.outlook.com Remote server: buxtehude.debian.org If the email receiver is not correct, please help me forward it to the right receiver. Thanks! -- Best Regards

Re: Cannot update the Debian bug 896911

2018-09-14 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Yanhui He wrote: > I need to update a 3rd PR to Debian by sending mail > to 896...@bugs.debian.org, but it always failed. > 550 5.0.350 Remote server returned an error -> 550 Unknown or archived bug The bug tracker page https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=89691

Cannot update the Debian bug 896911

2018-09-14 Thread Yanhui He
Hi, I need to update a 3rd PR to Debian by sending mail to 896...@bugs.debian.org<mailto:896...@bugs.debian.org>, but it always failed. Would you please help me take a look? --Error Details-- Reported error: 550 5.0.350 Remote server returned an error -> 550 Unknown or arc

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-12 Thread Brad Rogers
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 21:24:42 -0400 Ric Moore wrote: Hello Ric, >Works a charm for me, and has for years, BUT every once in awhile As it does for many, I'm sure. >the volume levels back up to 100%. Pulse rides on top of alsa, so alsa And that's a problem. Now, if sound goes wrong there are

Re: bug

2018-09-12 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 08:28:02PM -0500, james wrote: > E: The value 'stable-updates' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as > such a release is not available in the sources > E: _cache->open() failed, please report. Please post here the contents of

bug

2018-09-11 Thread james
E: The value 'stable-updates' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a release is not available in the sources E: _cache->open() failed, please report.

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-11 Thread Ric Moore
On 09/10/2018 08:27 AM, Brad Rogers wrote: On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:53:01 + (UTC) Curt wrote: Hello Curt, So uninstall it then in that unfortunate case--with extreme prejudice Time. Oh, and I can't be arsed to try PA in the first place. :-) Or are we dealing with the supernatural

Re: [beginning OT] Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread rhkramer
On Monday, September 10, 2018 09:37:28 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote: > I could offer my program cdrskin as real example. > It is a cdrecord/wodim compatibility wrapper but exceeds both when it > comes to DVD and BD media. Thanks, for: * the useful example, and * changing the Subject: line

[OT] Re: Wrappers and emulation (was Bug#908349)

2018-09-10 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Reco wrote: > Wait. You're *the* Thomas Schmitt who wrote xorriso? Yep. I am the current developer of libburn, libisofs, libisoburn, cdrskin, xorriso. There were others involved, though. libburn was forked from a half-dead project in 2006. Not more than 25 percent of the code is still from

Re: [beginning OT] Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Reco
Hi. On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 03:37:28PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Reco wrote: > > > It's the usual. A compatibility wrapper can never exceed the original. > > rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hmm, I don't see why it couldn't in some sense -- I'm trying to think of how > > to

[beginning OT] Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Reco wrote: > > It's the usual. A compatibility wrapper can never exceed the original. rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > Hmm, I don't see why it couldn't in some sense -- I'm trying to think of how > to say what I want to say, let me try a made-up example. I could offer my program cdrskin as real

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Brad Rogers
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:53:01 + (UTC) Curt wrote: Hello Curt, >So uninstall it then in that unfortunate case--with extreme prejudice Time. Oh, and I can't be arsed to try PA in the first place. :-) >Or are we dealing with the supernatural here (software from Hell)? I'm wary because of

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Curt
On 2018-09-10, Brad Rogers wrote: > > The machine it does affect is the one that I routinely use, which has > been in use for longer than PA has been around. I /could/ install PA, > but am reluctant to do so, since sound works here ATM and I'm concerned > that installing PA may cause issues for

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread rhkramer
On Monday, September 10, 2018 05:49:01 AM Reco wrote: > It's the usual. A compatibility wrapper can never exceed the original. Hmm, I don't see why it couldn't in some sense -- I'm trying to think of how to say what I want to say, let me try a made-up example. Suppose some piece of software is

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Brad Rogers
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:49:01 +0300 Reco wrote: Hello Reco, >On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:59:03AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: >> I've not been running apulse long, but so far, no crashes in Ff 62. >So upstream lies then. To quote apulse's README.md: Maybe, maybe not. It's only been a couple of

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Reco
Hi. On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:59:03AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 11:43:39 +0300 > Reco wrote: > > Hello Reco, > > >Moreover, apulse causes Firefox to crash since Firefox version 58, as > > I've not been running apulse long, but so far, no crashes in Ff 62. So

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-10 Thread Brad Rogers
On Sun, 9 Sep 2018 11:43:39 +0300 Reco wrote: Hello Reco, >Moreover, apulse causes Firefox to crash since Firefox version 58, as I've not been running apulse long, but so far, no crashes in Ff 62. >apulse is a kludge, not a solution. That's as may be (I don't have an opinion either way).

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-09 Thread deloptes
Rob van der Putten wrote: > Does anyone know why ALSA is no longer supported? You mean supported by Firefox? I guess they decided PA is more easy to implement as default interface ... whatever underlaying audio system you use. I still could not understand why, but this seems irreversible.

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-09 Thread Nicolas George
to...@tuxteam.de (2018-09-09): > Personally, I couldn't care less: I consider my browser's inability > to make sounds a welcome *feature*, so not having Pulse (which is my > default) just naturally takes care of that. Same for me. And apulse seems to work for me anyway. > Given the amount of

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-09 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:24:30AM +0200, Rob van der Putten wrote: > Hi there > > > Note: A reply in bugs failed. > > On 09/09/18 10:08, Marco Lucidi wrote: > > > On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 21:41:11 +0200 Samuel Thibault > > wrote: > > > Unfortunately

Re: Bug#908349: firefox-esr: no sound after upgrading from 52.9 to 60.2

2018-09-09 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 10:24:30AM +0200, Rob van der Putten wrote: > Hi there > > > Note: A reply in bugs failed. > > On 09/09/18 10:08, Marco Lucidi wrote: > > > On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 21:41:11 +0200 Samuel Thibault > > wrote: > > > Unfortunately AIUI upstream has stopped

<    6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >