Hi,
Recently I created debian 9.9 image in the Ubuntu openstack and I was able
to create instance from the image.I assigned floating ip to the interface.I
tried to ping floating ip from the router.It is unreachable.I can ping
external/internal gateway from the router.It perfectly works on the
In my system there are two ethernet card. I can't ping to other machine via
eth0 but eth1 is working fine. My ethernat controller is
Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708 Gigabit
Ethernet (rev 12) It is the output from lspci . Can anybody help???
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12
Kousik Maiti wrote:
In my system there are two ethernet card. I can't ping to other machine
via eth0 but eth1 is working fine. My ethernat controller is
Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708 Gigabit
Ethernet (rev 12) It is the output from lspci . Can anybody help
Both are connected with Net.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Marc Shapiro mshapiro...@yahoo.comwrote:
Kousik Maiti wrote:
In my system there are two ethernet card. I can't ping to other machine
via eth0 but eth1 is working fine. My ethernat controller is
Ethernet controller: Broadcom
are connected with Net.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Marc Shapiro mshapiro...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Kousik Maiti wrote:
In my system there are two ethernet card. I can't ping to other
machine
via eth0 but eth1 is working fine. My ethernat controller is
Ethernet controller: Broadcom
Please don't top post. I have rewritten this to conform to suggested list
standard and replied at bottom.
Kousik Maiti:
In my system there are two ethernet card. I can't ping to other machine
via eth0 but eth1 is working fine. My ethernat controller is Ethernet
controller: Broadcom Corporation
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Thorny thorntreeh...@gmail.com wrote:
Please don't top post. I have rewritten this to conform to suggested list
standard and replied at bottom.
Kousik Maiti:
In my system there are two ethernet card. I can't ping to other machine
via eth0 but eth1
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:13:18PM +0530, Kousik Maiti wrote:
Both are connected with Net.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Marc Shapiro mshapiro...@yahoo.comwrote:
Kousik Maiti wrote:
In my system there are two ethernet card. I can't ping to other machine
via eth0 but eth1
at 3:49 PM, Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:13:18PM +0530, Kousik Maiti wrote:
Both are connected with Net.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Marc Shapiro mshapiro...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Kousik Maiti wrote:
In my system there are two ethernet card. I can't
Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au writes:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:13:18PM +0530, Kousik Maiti wrote:
can you show us
ip r
ifconfig
ip a
ip li
ip rule
Sorry to break into this thread, but what package is the 'ip' command
in? I tried 'apt-cache search ip network', but it returns hundreds of
In 873ad0i6e9@cjlinux.localnet, Carl Johnson wrote:
Sorry to break into this thread, but what package is the 'ip' command
in?
iproute
Some other distributions call the same package iproute2.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b...@iguanasuicide.net
On Thursday 26 March 2009 16:41:02 Carl Johnson wrote:
Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au writes:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:13:18PM +0530, Kousik Maiti wrote:
can you show us
ip r
ifconfig
ip a
ip li
ip rule
Sorry to break into this thread, but what package is the 'ip' command
in?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:41:02 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
Alex Samad writes:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:13:18PM +0530, Kousik Maiti wrote:
can you show us
ip r
ifconfig
ip a
ip li
ip rule
Sorry to break into this thread, but what package is the 'ip' command
in? I tried
Lisi Reisz:
On Thursday 26 March 2009 16:41:02 Carl Johnson wrote:
Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au writes:
Sorry to break into this thread, but what package is the 'ip' command
in?
I've got it in Bash. Are you sure that you have not? Have you tried it?
It is not in bash. Bash includes
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 08:42:26PM +0100, Jochen Schulz wrote:
Lisi Reisz:
On Thursday 26 March 2009 16:41:02 Carl Johnson wrote:
Alex Samad a...@samad.com.au writes:
Sorry to break into this thread, but what package is the 'ip' command
in?
I've got it in Bash. Are you sure that
Florian Kulzer florian.kulzer+deb...@icfo.es writes:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 09:41:02 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
Sorry to break into this thread, but what package is the 'ip' command
in? I tried 'apt-cache search ip network', but it returns hundreds of
matching packages.
The package is
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:51:12 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
Florian Kulzer writes:
[...]
If you want to search for utilities with generic names then it helps to
use apt-file like this:
apt-file search bin/ip | grep '/ip$'
I use dialup so I've never been willing to download the huge
Florian Kulzer florian.kulzer+deb...@icfo.es writes:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:51:12 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
Florian Kulzer writes:
[...]
If you want to search for utilities with generic names then it helps to
use apt-file like this:
apt-file search bin/ip | grep '/ip$'
I use
I can't ping to other ip address as it complainsdestination host
unreachable.
Can anybody help???
--
Wishing you the very best of everything, always!!!
Kousik Maiti
Staff Scientist
Centre for Development of Advanced Computing(Formerly NCST)
Website: www.cdacmumbai.in
Registered Linux User #474025
I'd try to:
$ ip a ls
# make sure you have the expected values, if not fix /etc/network/interfaces
$ ip route ls
$ ping $ip_of_default_gateway
If that works your problem is on your router.
/Martin
2009/3/23 Kousik Maiti kousiks...@gmail.com:
I can't ping to other ip address
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 08:01:33AM +0100, Martin wrote:
I'd try to:
$ ip a ls
thats interesting I have used ls for a while and never come across ls
option - its not in ip a help either cool
# make sure you have the expected values, if not fix /etc/network/interfaces
$ ip route ls
$ ping
Helge Stenström (KI/EAB) wrote:
From: W Paul Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 7 augusti 2006 16:22
Subject: Re: Can't ping
Helge Stenstrom wrote:
Response from `route -n` on my trouble machine (Debian Sid,
IP=147.214.195.137):
localhost:/mnt/hda9/helge# route -n
Kernel IP
I can't ping nodes outside my subnet. I can reach the internet by hopping via
another machine on the subnet, which makes it possible to write this e-mail.
Is there a config file I should check carefully? Things broke when I upgraded
my
Debian Sid in late July, with the previous successful
Helge Stenstrom wrote:
I can't ping nodes outside my subnet. I can reach the internet by hopping via
another machine on the subnet, which makes it possible to write this e-mail.
Is there a config file I should check carefully? Things broke when I upgraded my
Debian Sid in late July
From: W Paul Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 7 augusti 2006 16:22
Subject: Re: Can't ping
Helge Stenstrom wrote:
Response from `route -n` on my trouble machine (Debian Sid,
IP=147.214.195.137):
localhost:/mnt/hda9/helge# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination
Helge Stenström (KI/EAB) wrote:
From: W Paul Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 7 augusti 2006 16:22
Subject: Re: Can't ping
Helge Stenstrom wrote:
Response from `route -n` on my trouble machine (Debian Sid,
IP=147.214.195.137):
localhost:/mnt/hda9/helge# route -n
Kernel IP
I can't ping either. I have Debian Sid, and made a system upgrade in late July.
Is the cause the same?
pinging other machines on the same subnet works.
The route command takes very long time (40 seconds), but gives the expected
result. (disclaimer: I don't understand this stuff, but I can
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:38:33PM +0200, Helge Stenstr?m (KI/EAB) wrote:
I can't ping either. I have Debian Sid, and made a system upgrade in late
July. Is the cause the same?
pinging other machines on the same subnet works.
The route command takes very long time (40 seconds), but gives
I can ping by IP machines on the same subnet (or at least
attached to the same switch on my desk). I can't ping other
machines, such as 66.249.93.99 (www.google.com)
or 147.214.214.11 (one of my nameservers)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] helped me understand that `route` is slow because
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 16:40 +0200, Helge Stenström (KI/EAB) wrote:
I can ping by IP machines on the same subnet (or at least
attached to the same switch on my desk). I can't ping other
machines, such as 66.249.93.99 (www.google.com)
or 147.214.214.11 (one of my nameservers)
[EMAIL
On fre, 2006-08-04 at 14:38 +0200, Helge Stenström (KI/EAB) wrote:
I can't ping either. I have Debian Sid, and made a system upgrade in late
July. Is the cause the same?
pinging other machines on the same subnet works.
The route command takes very long time (40 seconds), but gives
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 14:38 +0200, Helge Stenström (KI/EAB) wrote:
I can't ping either. I have Debian Sid, and made a system upgrade in late
July. Is the cause the same?
pinging other machines on the same subnet works.
The route command takes very long time (40 seconds), but gives
Any ideas what's wrong and how to solve this problem?
try to ping a numeric ip (google.com has address 64.233.167.99)
check the route tables too
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pol Hallen [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any ideas what's wrong and how to solve this problem?
try to ping a numeric ip (google.com has address 64.233.167.99)
No, pinging IP's does not work either.
check the route tables too
route -n:
84.60.0.1
user data and password and
then connect to my provider with pon dsl-provider, with ifconfig I can
see that my ppp0 has a dynamic IP address. With plog I also see that
I have been assigned two DNS servers. However, I can't ping any
domains or surf in the internet.
Can you ping the DNS servers
check the route tables too
route -n:
84.60.0.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH0 00 ppp0
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 00 eth0
0.0.0.0
. With plog I also see that
I have been assigned two DNS servers. However, I can't ping any
domains or surf in the internet.
Any ideas what's wrong and how to solve this problem?
The connection is OK since it works fine with my Windows box.
Regards,
Chris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
dsl-provider, with ifconfig I can
see that my ppp0 has a dynamic IP address. With plog I also see that
I have been assigned two DNS servers. However, I can't ping any
domains or surf in the internet.
Can you ping the DNS servers by explicit IP number?
-- hendrik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Scotty Fitzgerald wrote:
I had a similar problem, When I set up the machine I
had a Ethernet card that was autodetected, and the
the autodetection set up the ethernet card as the default
gateway to the internet. While your ethernet is the default
gateway the dialup won't establish itself
David Clymer wrote:
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 21:50, Scotty Fitzgerald wrote:
I had a similar problem, When I set up the machine I
had a Ethernet card that was autodetected, and the
the autodetection set up the ethernet card as the default
gateway to the internet. While your ethernet is the
I had a similar problem, When I set up the machine I
had a Ethernet card that was autodetected, and the
the autodetection set up the ethernet card as the default
gateway to the internet. While your ethernet is the default
gateway the dialup won't establish itself as a gateway. Try to
remove
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 21:50, Scotty Fitzgerald wrote:
I had a similar problem, When I set up the machine I
had a Ethernet card that was autodetected, and the
the autodetection set up the ethernet card as the default
gateway to the internet. While your ethernet is the default
gateway the
Dear all,
I'm on Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (Woody) and stuck in the middle:
I exec pon VOL and get a connection, but no pings do return (100% loss).
As a connection has been estblished, I guess the several config files are
okay. Therefore I've pasted the output of netstat -nr, route, and
ifconf
kernel 2.2.X doesn't support it so decided to do the upgrade.
Cool, my first kernel compilation.
So, I upgraded to 2.4.18, set up the ethers, and everything is ok, DHCP
is ok.
I hoop up my Powerbook to eth1 ( inside adapter ) and get an IP from
the DHCP. Fine.
Problem is: I can't ping it. Odd
After using static IP for a few years I've changed the provider and have to use
DHCP. The steps I've done:
1. Edited /etc/network/interfaces file and changed eth1 to dhcp
2. Installed dhcp3-client (also tried dhcp-client)
The networking starts up, gets an IP address from DHCP server, gets the
---
Antony Gelberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
Hi,
i have a Debian (testing) machine as a firewall (named arthur) with 2
nics, eth0 that is connected to the internet and gets an ip of the ISP
via DHCP and eth1 which serves
HI,
problem solved. I can now ping and ssh!
It was indeed a problem with my iptables firewall and rules.
First i changed the logging part so i could clearly catch anything (the
rules where placed in the wrong order).
Then i adjusted the ICPM SSH rules and it worked.
Sorry for the noise i
Hi,
i have a Debian (testing) machine as a firewall (named arthur) with 2
nics, eth0 that is connected to the internet and gets an ip of the ISP
via DHCP and eth1 which serves ip's for the lan and has ip 192.168.0.1.
Currently there is only 1 other pc (named lancelot) besides the firewall
machine
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
Hi,
i have a Debian (testing) machine as a firewall (named arthur) with 2
nics, eth0 that is connected to the internet and gets an ip of the ISP
via DHCP and eth1 which serves ip's for the lan and has ip
192.168.0.1. Currently there is only 1 other pc (named
Hi
I'm trying to set up IP masquerading. I had it set up under a previous
install, but I can't get it going now. The problem seems to be related to
the fact that I can't ping the other computer on the LAN, the one that's
going to be behind this one. Everytime I try to ping, this is the output I
On Sunday 06 July 2003 16:57, Vikki Roemer wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to set up IP masquerading. I had it set up under a previous
install, but I can't get it going now. The problem seems to be related to
the fact that I can't ping the other computer on the LAN, the one that's
going to be behind
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 05:21:37PM +0200, Nicos Gollan wrote:
On Sunday 06 July 2003 16:57, Vikki Roemer wrote:
Hi
I'm trying to set up IP masquerading. I had it set up under a previous
install, but I can't get it going now. The problem seems to be related to
the fact that I can't ping
to be related to
the fact that I can't ping the other computer on the LAN, the one that's
going to be behind this one. Everytime I try to ping, this is the
output I
get:
$ ping hal1
PING hal1 (172.17.0.2): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Operation not permitted
ping: wrote
I've recently moved and just come around to getting my last machine back
on my network... Sparc Station 5
I use ipchains on my Sparc IPX running 2.2r6 to do forwarding, and all's
working well for everything else... But this one sparc which was working
fine now isn't It can ping everything
on Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Martin Edward John Waller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hello,
I have win95PC (yuck - sorry.) (192.168.201.2) and
a woody debian box. (192.168.201.1). Trouble is,
even though the ethernet cards are up OK I can't
communicate between them (ping, anything, using
numeric
Hello,
I have win95PC (yuck - sorry.) (192.168.201.2) and
a woody debian box. (192.168.201.1). Trouble is,
even though the ethernet cards are up OK I can't
communicate between them (ping, anything, using
numeric IPs or hotsnames).
Thing is, this used to work before I upgraded to
woody and when
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:04:30PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
| On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:54:26 -0800 (PST) John Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| i use [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subsribe to this list but was told i
| need approval from modulator.
|
| An amplitude modulator, or a frequency modulator?
I
On Monday 25 February 2002 04:44 pm, dman wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:04:30PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
| On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:54:26 -0800 (PST) John Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| i use [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subsribe to this list but was told i
| need approval from modulator.
|
|
i can use mail from pop.citiz.net in Windows
but can't use it in Debian 2.2 and can't ping it.
i use [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subsribe to this list but
was told i need approval from modulator.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:54:26 -0800 (PST) John Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i can use mail from pop.citiz.net in Windows
but can't use it in Debian 2.2 and can't ping it.
i use [EMAIL PROTECTED] to subsribe to this list but
was told i need approval from modulator.
An amplitude modulator
Hi, I don't understand why I cant ping outside my own network on my
primary nameserver. I called the isp and according to them there's no
problem with connectivity (they always say that). I also have a web,
mail and db server (all running potato) all of which I can reach the
outside but not the
The isp was making changes-- problem resolved.
A couple of months ago, my harddrive was damaged so had to build a new
system from scratch - potato boot floppies, then a few packages, then
apt-get dist-upgrade to testing, then added the rest of the system.
A few weeks later, I installed lprng (+ related), and at that point,
when I started to
debs,
i can ping my lan and router, but i can't get
out (from there) to the isp.
ifconfig is receiving/tranmitting packets (from
the lan) and resolv.conf has the ip addys for
the dns servers.
what did i overlook?
ia, t.
bentley taylor.
//
Maybe your default gateway has not been set.
try
route add default gw my.router.host.name
J.
-Original Message-
From: p [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:49 PM
To: debs
Subject: can't ping isp
debs,
i can ping my lan and router, but i can't get
out (from
except for the
installation directory. All good so far. Installed Windows 98 SE on the
VMware VM, and it gets an IP of 172.16.66.128. All dandy. My host
machine's IP is 128.61.40.17, but I can't ping this from the VM
Windows. However, I can ping the virtual machine from the host. What did
I break?
My
on the
VMware VM, and it gets an IP of 172.16.66.128. All dandy. My host
machine's IP is 128.61.40.17, but I can't ping this from the VM
Windows. However, I can ping the virtual machine from the host. What did
I break?
My ipconfig states:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Jason Majors wrote:
Windows. However, I can ping the virtual machine from the host. What did
I break?
The correct answer to this question is that I'm a moron. I'm supposed to
ping 172.16.66.1 NOT my real host IP (128.61.40.17) to get access to the
machine. Why is it
I suceffull have a remote access to my linux box, the server have a
internet conection with ip 200.200.200.200 and I set my mgetty to set
local ip 10.0.0.1 e remote 10.0.0.2.
In the server I ping 10.0.0.1 ( this ip local with pppd get) but don't
ping 10.0.0.2
In the client I ping 10.0.0.2 ( this
Hello,
I have a Debian box that I can not ping my SuSE box. Is there something in
Debian that I am
missing? I have no problem setting up the SuSE boxes and networking them,
but I really want
to convert to Debian. I am a newbie so any help is appreciated.
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 08:19:38AM -0700, Kirk Schroeder wrote:
Hello,
I have a Debian box that I can not ping my SuSE box. Is there something in
Debian that I am
missing? I have no problem setting up the SuSE boxes and networking them,
but I really want
to convert to Debian. I am a
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 08:19:38AM -0700, Kirk Schroeder wrote:
I have a Debian box that I can not ping my SuSE box. Is there something in
Debian that I am missing?
do you have the driver for your network-card loaded?
do you have configured the interface correctly? (man ifup, interfaces, ...)
72 matches
Mail list logo
