On 22/08/2022 18:02, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:02:22AM +, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Any applications using standard decorations (Firefox, MATE Terminal,
Google Chrome etc).
It's worth pointing out, perhaps, that Google Chrome does *not* use
the standard window manager
Bret Busby wrote:
>
> And, after all of that, in looking in my Appearance -> Themes, through
> the Yaru stuff, and noticing that the YaruGreen looks like the
> TraditionalGreen, I also noticed that the YaruOk looks like the
> TraditionalOkBrave.
I've tried all the Yaru* themes and none of
Curt (12022-08-22):
> What about 'gtk3-nocsd'?
>
> Description-en: Disable Gtk+ 3 client side decorations (CSD)
> gtk3-nocsd LD_PRELOADs a small library to disable the client side
> decorations (CSD) of Gtk+ 3.
>
> ...
>
> Or maybe this isn't the remedy to the ills referred to in the
On 8/22/22 4:07 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
. . . A manifestation of the “we know better than you” mindset of the
GNOME people. . . .
*JUST* the GNOME people? I've found that, in general, the "we know
better than you" mindset is even worse with Apple and M$. And getting
worse still, especially
Victor Sudakov (12022-08-22):
> > # Gtk+3 sucks
> > Style "Application Class" !MWMDecor
> > Style "Gajim" !MWMDecor
> Where do you put this magic? Hopefully it could help me fix Lens and
> Teams? I hate applications to bring their own decorations.
In ~/.fvwm2rc, so I doubt it will be useful for
Nicolas George wrote:
>
> It is, I have found, a problem with most Gtk+3 applications. A
> manifestation of the “we know better than you” mindset of the GNOME
> people. I have not found a solution to disable it globally, short of
> patching Gtk+3 itself. The best I have found is to force my WM to
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:02:22AM +, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > Any applications using standard decorations (Firefox, MATE Terminal,
> > Google Chrome etc).
>
> It's worth pointing out, perhaps, that Google Chrome does *not* use
> the standard window manager decorations
On 2022-08-22, Nicolas George wrote:
>
> It is, I have found, a problem with most Gtk+3 applications. A
> manifestation of the we know better than you mindset of the GNOME
> people. I have not found a solution to disable it globally, short of
> patching Gtk+3 itself. The best I have found is to
On 22/8/22 18:46, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Bret Busby wrote:
[dd]
I use the Theme named "TraditionalOk", with the panel at the bottom of
the screen, and it is the most like MS Windows 95, and, gives my the
interface that I prefer.
I don't have any "TraditionalOk" theme there, just countless
Greg Wooledge (12022-08-22):
> It's worth pointing out, perhaps, that Google Chrome does *not* use
> the standard window manager decorations by default. There is, however,
> an option you can toggle to make it do so.
It is, I have found, a problem with most Gtk+3 applications. A
manifestation of
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:02:22AM +, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Any applications using standard decorations (Firefox, MATE Terminal,
> Google Chrome etc).
It's worth pointing out, perhaps, that Google Chrome does *not* use
the standard window manager decorations by default. There is, however,
Bret Busby wrote:
[dd]
> >> I use the Theme named "TraditionalOk", with the panel at the bottom of
> >> the screen, and it is the most like MS Windows 95, and, gives my the
> >> interface that I prefer.
> >
> > I don't have any "TraditionalOk" theme there, just countless variants of the
> >
On 22/8/22 18:02, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Bret Busby wrote:
On 22/8/22 16:03, Victor Sudakov wrote:
The titlebar colors of active and inactive windows are the same which
is very inconvenient. In the previous version of Ubuntu/Mate, the
color of the active window's titlebar was distinct.
Hello
Bret Busby wrote:
> On 22/8/22 16:03, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> >
> > The titlebar colors of active and inactive windows are the same which
> > is very inconvenient. In the previous version of Ubuntu/Mate, the
> > color of the active window's titlebar was distinct.
Hello Bret!
>
> 1. The Ubuntu
On 22/8/22 16:43, Bret Busby wrote:
On 22/8/22 16:34, Bret Busby wrote:
On 22/8/22 16:03, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
Sorry for asking a Ubuntu-specific question. Please redirect me to a
better mailing list if you feel it right.
I was using ubuntu-mate 20.04.4 with MATE 1.24.0.
On 22/8/22 16:34, Bret Busby wrote:
On 22/8/22 16:03, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
Sorry for asking a Ubuntu-specific question. Please redirect me to a
better mailing list if you feel it right.
I was using ubuntu-mate 20.04.4 with MATE 1.24.0. Now I have switched
to 22.04.1 with
On 22/8/22 16:03, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
Sorry for asking a Ubuntu-specific question. Please redirect me to a
better mailing list if you feel it right.
I was using ubuntu-mate 20.04.4 with MATE 1.24.0. Now I have switched
to 22.04.1 with MATE 1.26.0 and come across an
Dear Colleagues,
Sorry for asking a Ubuntu-specific question. Please redirect me to a
better mailing list if you feel it right.
I was using ubuntu-mate 20.04.4 with MATE 1.24.0. Now I have switched
to 22.04.1 with MATE 1.26.0 and come across an unfortunate thing:
The titlebar colors of active
18 matches
Mail list logo
