On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Joao Ferreira gmail
joao.miguel.c.ferre...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
the process should be quite straightforward.
1st u need to make sure you have a free partition with no relevant data
on it (partition to instal RH).
then you simply start installing RedHat
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Joao Ferreira gmail
joao.miguel.c.ferre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 16:22 +0430, hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
On my debian machine, I need to install redhat on one of its
partitions and so make it dual boot . Can you please let me know how
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Joao Ferreira gmail
joao.miguel.c.ferre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 16:22 +0430, hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
On my debian machine, I need to install redhat on one of its
partitions and so make it dual boot . Can you please let me know how
Dear All
On my debian machine, I need to install redhat on one of its partitions and
so make it dual boot . Can you please let me know how this can be
accomplished?
Thank you
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 16:22 +0430, hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
On my debian machine, I need to install redhat on one of its
partitions and so make it dual boot . Can you please let me know how
this can be accomplished?
Hello,
the process should be quite straightforward.
1st u need to make
On Tuesday 03 August 2010 03:52:19 hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
On my debian machine, I need to install redhat on one of its partitions and
so make it dual boot . Can you please let me know how this can be
accomplished?
Thank you
If you have the resources, I prefer using a VM, Virtualbox,
On 8/3/2010 9:55 AM, Greg Madden wrote:
On Tuesday 03 August 2010 03:52:19 hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
On my debian machine, I need to install redhat on one of its partitions and
so make it dual boot . Can you please let me know how this can be
accomplished?
Thank you
If you have the
You can also, if you have them partitioned separately, share filesystems. I
used to do that back in the day, with Slackware 2.x and RH 3.0.3. It's just
a matter of mounting the appropriate filesystem to the mount point.
You could probably still do the same with if you are using lvm, as long as
On Tuesday 03 August 2010 05:25:11 Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 16:22 +0430, hadi motamedi wrote:
Dear All
On my debian machine, I need to install redhat on one of its
partitions and so make it dual boot . Can you please let me know how
this can be accomplished?
--- Guy Roussin [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit :
Ici j'ai des machines sous sarge et d'autres sous
etch et
la manip que je t'ai indiquée fonctionne.
A+
GUy
Bonjour Guy et toute la liste,
Je ne vois pas trop comment tu fais tes manip...
Pour ma part, j'avais l'habitude de copier entre vi
Bonjour à tous,Anciennement utilisateur RedHat , je suis entrain d'essayer de basculer complétement sur Debian mais je rencontre quelques problemes (bug ?) ...J'ai installé vi (vim) via un simple apt-get tous fonctionne bien sauf que je ne peux pas faire de copier/coller avec putty avec vi alors
Le mardi 26 septembre 2006 11:50, Alain Tervention a écrit :
...
-
Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le
sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos
opinions et vos expériences. Cliquez ici.
Humm
Alain Tervention wrote:
Anciennement utilisateur RedHat , je suis entrain d'essayer de basculer
complétement sur Debian mais je rencontre quelques problemes (bug ?) ...
J'ai installé vi (vim) via un simple apt-get tous fonctionne bien sauf
que je ne peux pas faire de copier/coller avec putty
Hmm,
Lesskdisk vist kun findes som Debian pakke,ikke?
Igen serveren er RH og den eneste thin clinet løsning jeg kunne finde
var LTSP(til server side).
BTW: kan lessdisk workingstations snakke med LTSP serveren via PXE?
MVH;admir
On 8/17/06, Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 17
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:41:10 +0200 Admir Trakic wrote:
Lesskdisk vist kun findes som Debian pakke,ikke?
Igen serveren er RH og den eneste thin clinet løsning jeg kunne finde
var LTSP(til server side).
BTW: kan lessdisk workingstations snakke med LTSP serveren via PXE?
Med RH mener du Redhat?
On 8/18/06, Jonas Smedegaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 10:41:10 +0200 Admir Trakic wrote:
Lesskdisk vist kun findes som Debian pakke,ikke?
Igen serveren er RH og den eneste thin clinet løsning jeg kunne finde
var LTSP(til server side).
BTW: kan lessdisk workingstations
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 00:32 -0500, Kent West wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 20:03 -0700, charles norwood wrote:
Debian stable may be able to run on an unplugged computer
Maybe it's because you use Stable? Why I unplug the machine while
using Sid, it
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 22:37 -0700, Alvin Oga wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
solid. Debian stable may be able to run on an unplugged
^
computer
any machine can boot and run in the unplugged state,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
However, Woody (which was released analogous to RH9) was just as rock
solid stable as Sarge. I agree completely that we must compare
relatively equal systems, but doing so does not change the outcome:
Debian Stable lives up to its name.
I was
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 20:03 -0700, charles norwood wrote:
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 17:58 -0700, John wrote:
Hi, just wanted to say I've used various versions of linux, and have
mainly stuck with redhat/fedora (yeah, I know), but the latest versions
have sort of bothered me.
Hi, just wanted to say I've used various versions of linux, and have
mainly stuck with redhat/fedora (yeah, I know), but the latest versions
have sort of bothered me. So, today I tried debian for the first time,
and wow, am I impressed. I plan on migrating all my servers, home and
office, to
Really great news. I am also shifted here like you :)On 4/6/06, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, just wanted to say I've used various versions of linux, and havemainly stuck with redhat/fedora (yeah, I know), but the latest versionshave sort of bothered me.So, today I tried debian for the first
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 17:58 -0700, John wrote:
Hi, just wanted to say I've used various versions of linux, and have
mainly stuck with redhat/fedora (yeah, I know), but the latest versions
have sort of bothered me. So, today I tried debian for the first time,
and wow, am I impressed. I
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 23:03, charles norwood wrote:
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 17:58 -0700, John wrote:
mainly stuck with redhat/fedora (yeah, I know), but the latest versions
have sort of bothered me. So, today I tried debian for the first time,
and wow, am I impressed.
Snip
Under
charles norwood wrote:
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 17:58 -0700, John wrote:
Hi, just wanted to say I've used various versions of linux, and have
mainly stuck with redhat/fedora (yeah, I know), but the latest versions
have sort of bothered me. So, today I tried debian for the first time,
and wow,
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 20:03 -0700, charles norwood wrote:
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 17:58 -0700, John wrote:
Hi, just wanted to say I've used various versions of linux, and have
mainly stuck with redhat/fedora (yeah, I know), but the latest versions
have sort of bothered me. So, today I
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 20:03 -0700, charles norwood wrote:
Debian stable may be able to run on an unplugged computer
Maybe it's because you use Stable? Why I unplug the machine while
using Sid, it just dies. :)
Your /etc/rununplugged.rc file must be hosed.
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
solid. Debian stable may be able to run on an unplugged
^
computer
any machine can boot and run in the unplugged state,
otherwise your config is not properly configured
but,
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
To be fair, RH9 was released 03/31/2003, while Sarge was released
06/06/2005. I would say that a difference of 2+ years would be quite
significant in terms of hardware support and general application
stability.
bingo ...
some folks like to
Hi! I recently switched to debian Sarge (and sid) for all of my work (YAY I
LOVE IT!).
Now, until now, I had been using redhat 7.3 for my servers. I have many redhat
7.3 servers, and now, I have installed 2 debian sarge servers (i know it is
not yet released, but I have tested it for months
google ssh reverse dns debian
turned up this as the first hit:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2002/03/msg00081.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
good to you, Debian runs on it.
We moved our servers from redhat to debian.
A few servers moved to lineox, as their administrators were more
comfortable with the redhat-ish way of doing things.
We consolidated most of our servers to vservers as part of our migration.
This makes it trivial
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 08:37 pm, Alvin Oga wrote:
*.deb and *.rpm patches are readily available, but...
That brings to mind an opposing point, actually. I don't have statistics to
back this up, but my gut says at least 75% of the Linux world runs on
RPM-based distros for better or worse.
for a presentation on Differences between RedHat and Debian so as to
convince my management. I'd be thankful if anyone could help me in this regard.
TIA,
rrs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
management, release cycle,
security updates and many more.
I'm looking for a presentation on Differences between RedHat and Debian so as to
convince my management. I'd be thankful if anyone could help me in this regard.
TIA,
rrs
Hi Ritesh,
the only thing that need be said is RPM based distros
updates and many
more. I'm looking for a presentation on Differences between RedHat
and Debian so as to convince my management. I'd be thankful if
anyone could help me in this regard.
TIA, rrs
Have you searched the net? :)
Here's something from this list that may be useful for you, though
and many more.
I'm looking for a presentation on Differences between RedHat and Debian so as to
convince my management. I'd be thankful if anyone could help me in this regard.
I don't know of any papers, but I have moved from RHL to Debian.
My advice is do not convert.
Instead, Replace.
Running
policy, package management, release cycle, security updates and many
more. I'm looking for a presentation on Differences between RedHat
and Debian so as to convince my management. I'd be thankful if
anyone could help me in this regard.
that'd be a good idea ot use deb for now .. esp since rh
provides like
policy, package management, release cycle, security updates and many
more. I'm looking for a presentation on Differences between RedHat
and Debian so as to convince my management. I'd be thankful if
anyone could help me in this regard.
that'd be a good idea ot use deb for now .. esp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 18 March 2004 17:34, Matthew Joyce wrote:
I guess what I want to find out is, is there any reason why Debian would
not be able to do the job that they are suggesting Redhat for, and what
reasoning can I use to support my proposing
Le Mon, 26 Jan 2004 18:15:57 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait :
Bertrand Lemaître a écrit :
Pouvez vous m'aider à défendre (de manière objective :-) le choix
Debian.
Je pense que c'est un choix très judicieux pour une serveur:
- Libre (pas de surprise, pas de pb de licence... SCO ne
Le mardi 27 janvier 2004, Patrice Karatchentzeff a écrit...
bonjour,
les mêmes car en fait, il y en essentiellement une : la latence
insupportable entre deux versions stables. Cela joue aussi énormément
*contre* Debian.
Contre, éventuellement, mais cette latence n'est-elle pas une
Le Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:29:48 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait :
Le mardi 27 janvier 2004, Patrice Karatchentzeff a écrit...
bonjour,
les mêmes car en fait, il y en essentiellement une : la latence
insupportable entre deux versions stables. Cela joue aussi énorm
ment*contre*
Un décideur s'en fiche pas mal de savoir si untel est plus beau ou moins qu'un
autre, s'il peut faire plus ou moins. La seule chose dont il se préoccupe,
c'est d'être assuré. Il veut pouvoir se dire que à tout moment, il y aura
quelqu'un, qu'il payera très cher, pour faire fonctionner tout le
daniel huhardeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Et pour l'installation RH tient sur 3 CD Woody en fait 7 (la 3.r0) en
partant du principe d'une installation CD.
Salut,
Ça n'a rien à voir. Sur les 7 CD de la Debian, tu as _tous_ les paquets
de la distribution. Il faut bien reconnaître que les 3
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:50:48 +0100
Bertrand Lemaître [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonjour,
Je suis sur un site où il y a de nombreux linux.
Pour des raisons de mutualisation nous allons faire un choix de
distribution pour les futurs serveurs.
...
Pouvez vous m'aider à défendre (de
Le Tue, 27 Jan 2004 15:27:55 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] écrivait :
Patrice Karatchentzeff a écrit :
[...]
On ne met pas un truc officiellement en développement en prod :
c'est un très gros a priori *contre* Debian.
J'ai pas bien compris de quoi tu parle...
Parce que tu ne travailles pas
Le 12444ième jour après Epoch,
François Boisson écrivait:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:50:48 +0100
Bertrand Lemaître [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonjour,
Je suis sur un site où il y a de nombreux linux.
Pour des raisons de mutualisation nous allons faire un choix de
distribution pour les
Bonjour,
Je suis sur un site où il y a de nombreux linux.
Pour des raisons de mutualisation nous allons faire un choix de
distribution pour les futurs serveurs.
Initialement sur RedHat (6.2), je suis passé sous Debian (woody et sarge)
pour les différents serveurs que je gère, car je trouvais
Bonjour,
Je suis sur un site où il y a de nombreux linux.
Pour des raisons de mutualisation nous allons faire un choix de
distribution pour les futurs serveurs.
Initialement sur RedHat (6.2), je suis passé sous Debian (woody et sarge)
pour les différents serveurs que je gère, car je
Bertrand Lemaître a écrit :
Pouvez vous m'aider à défendre (de manière objective :-) le choix
Debian.
Je pense que c'est un choix très judicieux pour une serveur:
- Libre (pas de surprise, pas de pb de licence... SCO ne compte pas)
- La stabilité (même un peu viello diront certains... en
Le lun 26/01/2004 à 18:01, Nicosoft1 a écrit :
Tu doit bien savoir pourquoi tu utilise Debian plutôt qu'une autre distro,
donc tes arguments sont les bons :)
pareil :)
Et quand à convaincre de l'utilité d'une distrib plutôt qu'une autre face à
des personnes n'y connaissant strictement rien
va dire à quelqu'un qui connai rien que le système apt est
meilleur qu'un system RPM
sauf que apt n'a rien à voir avec rpm, il faudrait le comparer à yum et
justement les fedoristes ou redhatistes sont persuadés que yum est
meilleur que apt :)
En effet, je me suis un peu gourré dans mes
seguridad antes de nada.
Si no me equivoco en Debian hay un paquete para instalar a un
directorio, si pudiera hacer eso entonces podria instalar todo alli y
justo antes de pasar todo a / configurar lilo para que arrancara desde
el nuevo kernel.
Esto no lo conozco, pero el tema de arrancar Debian o
Holas. Tengo una RedHat instalada en el ordenador del trabajo y me
gustaria instalar una Debian sin tener que desinstalar todo lo que
tengo (conservar /usr/local y /home mas algunas cosas de /etc/) pero no
se como hacerlo sin perder un par de horas sin ordenador para trabajar.
Si no me equivoco
first last dijo:
Holas. Tengo una RedHat instalada en el ordenador del trabajo y me gustaria
instalar una Debian sin tener que desinstalar todo lo que tengo (conservar
/usr/local y /home mas algunas cosas de /etc/) pero no se como hacerlo sin
perder un par de horas sin ordenador para trabajar.
El mié, 24 de sep de 2003, a las 11:31:17 +0100, first last escribio ...
Holas. Tengo una RedHat instalada en el ordenador del trabajo y me
gustaria instalar una Debian sin tener que desinstalar todo lo que
tengo (conservar /usr/local y /home mas algunas cosas de /etc/) pero no
se como hacerlo
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 05:20, Bruno Diniz de Paula wrote:
Hi guys,
first of all, I'm not definetely willing to start a war here (although I
think I have already). :-) I'm a very satisfied and enthusiastic Debian
user, but I would like to hear from you guys the essential pros and cons
of each of
On 05/06/03 bob parker did speaketh:
But during the course of it all it became very clear to me. With Debian if /
when you get anything working it is because you found out what you had to do
and did it. Sometimes that might be a little difficult but you have this list
for support along
On 05/06/03 Aryan Ameri did speaketh:
RedHat does not have apt. apt was ported to support RPM long ago by
Connectiva. Now, you can manualy go and install apt on major RPM based
distros, like RedHat, SuSE and Mandrake. But, apt-rpm (as it is called)
does not enjoy the advantages that it
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:02:30 -0400
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was using Debian on all my boxes up until a couple of weeks ago,
when upgrading X in testing fried my X configuration and I had to start
over. I guess it needed more testing. :) I'm going to play with a few
On 05/06/03 Kevin McKinley did speaketh:
This release cycle is very different from the last one, because of the big
changes in glibc and gcc.
I used Woody for a year before it was released and was never bitten. With
Sarge I've needed to be careful about what I update and when.
I expect
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 09:35:05AM +0300, Aryan Ameri wrote:
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 14:20, Bruno Diniz de Paula wrote:
the essential pros and cons of each of the distributions. I'm
asking because for me the best thing about Debian (besides others)
is the package manager system. Now I've
base install
(RedHat 425MB min, Debian Woody: 125 - 150MB)
The one advantage that Redhat does have, is commercial support, large
companies like this, so that is why companies like Redhat, SuSE, tend to
go towards the corporate users or migrating companies, as they like the
comfort blanket
Hi guys,
first of all, I'm not definetely willing to start a war here (although I
think I have already). :-) I'm a very satisfied and enthusiastic Debian
user, but I would like to hear from you guys the essential pros and cons
of each of the distributions. I'm asking because for me the best thing
It's not just the package manager (dpkg/APT) but also the official
Debian APT repository. You'd be hard pressed to find another distro
with so much software available in one place. RedHat may be coming out
with a better package manager but unless they have the repository of
9000+ packages to go
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 03:20:35PM -0400, Bruno Diniz de Paula wrote:
first of all, I'm not definetely willing to start a war here (although I
think I have already). :-) I'm a very satisfied and enthusiastic Debian
user, but I would like to hear from you guys the essential pros and cons
of
The advantage of Red Hat is commercial support and easy installation.
The advantage of debian is a truly stable platform with thousands upon
thousands of apps compiled for it.
Red Hat actually does have people you can call and talk with for help
installing or configuring a supported application.
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 14:20, Bruno Diniz de Paula wrote:
Hi guys,
first of all, I'm not definetely willing to start a war here
(although I think I have already). :-) I'm a very satisfied and
enthusiastic Debian user, but I would like to hear from you guys
the essential pros and cons
Hola Caya,
Simplemente decirte si te refieres a mi comentario que tienes razón en
parte, yo con la redhat 7.1 estoy entusiasmado, si lees la última revista de
PCworld, se hace una comparativa de Versiones de LINUX, a Suse la ponen como
la primera con un 8, Debian es el segundo y pierde el
with Debian and RedHat
Dear Debianists!
I have a problem and I hope you can help me out!
Yesterday I installed Debian Woody 3.0r1 on my laptop. I have been using
RedHat 7.3 and I grew tired of things not working the way they should,
so I decided to try Debian out. I have a 40Gb disk, which
Dear Debianists!
I have a problem and I hope you can help me out!
Yesterday I installed Debian Woody 3.0r1 on my laptop. I have been using
RedHat 7.3 and I grew tired of things not working the way they should,
so I decided to try Debian out. I have a 40Gb disk, which was completely
under RedHat.
Dear Debianists!
I have a problem and I hope you can help me out!
Yesterday I installed Debian Woody 3.0r1 on my laptop. I have been using
RedHat 7.3 and I grew tired of things not working the way they should,
so I decided to try Debian out. I have a 40Gb disk, which was completely
under RedHat.
#include hallo.h
* Andrej Prsa [Fri, Jan 31 2003, 01:12:17PM]:
/dev/hda1 is RedHat's /boot
/dev/hda2 is RedHat's /
/dev/hda3 is Linux Swap
/dev/hda5 is Debian's /
I used to have Grub to load RedHat, which has now been replaced with
Lilo in MBR. It boots Debian without any problems and now
Andrej Prsa wrote:
/dev/hda1 is RedHat's /boot
/dev/hda2 is RedHat's /
/dev/hda3 is Linux Swap
/dev/hda5 is Debian's /
I used to have Grub to load RedHat, which has now been replaced with
Lilo in MBR. It boots Debian without any problems and now I don't know
how to boot back into RedHat.
Andrej Prsa said:
I would be happy to attach RedHat's grub.conf if it'd help!
mount the redhat / (or /boot if its a seperate partition) on
debian, copy the kernel to debian's /boot directory
edit /etc/lilo.conf and add an entry such as
image=/boot/vmlinuz-suse
label=suse
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:55:37PM -0100, Andrej Prsa wrote:
Yesterday I installed Debian Woody 3.0r1 on my laptop. I have been using
RedHat 7.3 and I grew tired of things not working the way they should,
so I decided to try Debian out. I have a 40Gb disk, which was completely
under RedHat.
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:04:24PM +0100, Alain BACH wrote:
* Mon problème de base avec Debian est un problème dINSTALLATION : ça peut
paraître con, mais jaimerais pouvoir utiliser mon bipro en SMP.
apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.19-686-smp
ou
apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.19-smp
ou
* Alain BACH [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-11-15 16:04] :
Bonjour à tous,
[...]
* Mon problème de base avec Debian est un problème dINSTALLATION : ça peut
paraître con, mais jaimerais pouvoir utiliser mon bipro en SMP. Jaimerais
pouvoir utiliser ma carte Xircom sur mon portable. Jaimerais
Bonsoir,
Pour faire simple et cours , Debian, Redhat, Mandrake,
Suse,Connectiva,..sont des distributions qui reposent sur un noyaui
Linux
Chaque distribution possède quelque spécificité mais cela reste du Linux.
Concernant Debian, il s'agit d'une distrution Linux mais aussi un état
Bonjour à tous,
Je vois que mes « conclusions » dhier ont largement contribuées à lancer le
débat sur le choix de mune ou lautre distributions de Linux.
Avant daller plus loin, permettez moi de placer mon décor personnel.
Jai ici deux machines :
- La première est un portable Compaq Armada
j'aime bien ton mail ( c'est le seul que j'ai lu sur le sujet ). Je pense
que tu n'auras aucunes difficulté à installé debian sur ta machine.
En tout cas, tu peux essayé tout seul ( tu dis que tu as du temps libre )
car c'est en forgeant qu'on devient forgeron !
N'hésite pas à demander de
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Debian vs Redhat : le débat ?
Bonjour à tous,
Je vois que mes « conclusions » dhier ont largement contribuées à lancer le
débat sur le choix de mune ou lautre distributions de Linux.
Avant daller plus loin, permettez moi de placer mon décor personnel.
Jai ici deux
Bernd [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
beherche jedoch nur die deutsche
sprache
Du irrst.
mehr deutsch in Debian kleiner FAQ zum anpassen des systems jedoch nicht
X
anpassen instaltions routine
Oder soll das Deutsch sein?
Gruß, Frank
--
Ich habe z.Z. nur einmal pro Tag Netzzugang. Daher
Hallo!
Martin Lohmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Bernd wrote:
warum gibt´s kein linux standard
kernel version ?.?.? mit paketen welche nur für diesen kernel sind
und
pakete VIM, PINE, BASH, LESS, ... die überall eisatzfähig sind gleich
welcher Version, Distribution
Es gibt einen eine
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:18:52 +0200, Bernd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
muss ich mir ein eigenes Linux aufbauen oder wäre es möglich mit
[De]bian ein linux für Deutsche und anderssprachige aufzubauen
Ich würde an Deiner Stelle erstmal versuchen, Deutsch zu schreiben,
bevor ich ein deutsches Linux
* Bernd [EMAIL PROTECTED] [24 10 02 21:18]:
Das ist eine Mailingliste, wo Debiannutzer anderen helfen. Stell
konkrete Fragen und teile mit, was du unternommen hast, um dein Problem
zu lösen.
Nur langweiliges Rumstänkern - und mehr ist deine E-Mail nicht -
interessiert hier niemanden.
bin
hi Martin
ich bin sehr erstaunt dass eine Antwort so prompt kam! :-) klasse super
du hasst recht das rad nochmal zu erfinden ist nicht OK
es gibt bereits ein Linux-standard LSB
wird Debian irgendwann zertifiziert ?
ist wohl viel arbeit
meine mitarbeit dafür biete ich an. beherche jedoch nur
--- Bernd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
es gibt bereits ein Linux-standard LSB
wird Debian irgendwann zertifiziert ?
ist wohl viel arbeit
meine mitarbeit dafür biete ich an. beherche jedoch nur die deutsche
sprache
wenn mitarbeit möglich ist dann auf dem gebieten
der LSB-zertifizierung
* Markus Kolb [EMAIL PROTECTED] [25 10 02 14:07]:
--- Bernd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
es gibt bereits ein Linux-standard LSB
wird Debian irgendwann zertifiziert ?
ist wohl viel arbeit
meine mitarbeit dafür biete ich an. beherche jedoch nur die deutsche
sprache
wenn mitarbeit möglich
Bernd wrote:
meine mitarbeit dafür biete ich an. beherche jedoch nur die deutsche
sprache
Ohne englisch Kenntnisse wird da wahrscheinlich nicht viel gehen...Linux
und Open Source wird nicht nur in einem Land entwickelt und verwendet
by, Martin
--
Häufig gestellte Fragen und Antworten
hi
bin SuSE-Linux user und habe die Sch.. voll
die Distribution Debian mal runtergeladen, instlliert, :-(
der eigentliche standard von UNIX wo ist er geblieben
pggtool ist alt RMP von redhat ist neu und gut warum nicht für Debian
wie gehts bei Debian ??
was ist mit DE in Debian sehr weit hinten?
Bernd wrote:
der eigentliche standard von UNIX wo ist er geblieben
pggtool ist alt RMP von redhat ist neu und gut warum nicht für Debian
Es gibt drei verschiedene Debian Versionen. Stable, testing und
unstable. Du wirst wahrscheinlich stable installiert haben, da kann es
schonmal vorkommen,
throw a fit), and forget about sharing it between
debian and redhat - they are way to different.
2) home directories are folders shared from each WinXP box (i.e. each
user's WinXP box shares a folder, and it gets mounted by all the linux
boxen as the appropriate user's home directory
El dia Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 11:55:18PM +0100, tejedor escribio:
y porque no usas el /boot para poner las dos imagenes del kernel? Ambos
linux compartian /boot, eso si dale minimo 10 mb.
Yo lo tenia asi y funcionaba de maravilla.
Salu2!!
hola
tengo instalados debian y redhat en el mismo disco
tejedor wrote:
hola
tengo instalados debian y redhat en el mismo disco
las particiones son
hda1 swap
hda2 boot
hda3 debian
hda4 redhat
el problema es que solo me arranca redhat.
he intentado configurar lilo
image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.2-2
label=linux
read-only
Imagínate que en el momento de ejecutar lilo tienes montada la RH o la
Debian en /mnt, debes pone que el kernel está en /mnt/boot/vmlinuz
--
.''`. cat /dev/gafas /dev/null
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (Kernel 2.4.18)
`-
hola
tengo instalados debian y redhat en el mismo disco
las particiones son
hda1 swap
hda2 boot
hda3 debian
hda4 redhat
el problema es que solo me arranca redhat.
he intentado configurar lilo
image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.4.2-2
label=linux
read-only
root=/dev/hda4
image
On Sat, 2002-03-16 at 16:55, tejedor wrote:
hola
tengo instalados debian y redhat en el mismo disco
el problema es que solo me arranca redhat.
he intentado configurar lilo
image=/hda3/boot/vmlinuz-2.2.19pre17
Esto ciertamente no te va a funcionar; el directorio donde esté el
kernel se
Roderick Cummings declaimed:
...but I have a dozen or so 486's, IPX's, udb's chugging along
Me too. Just because I can! And if I didn't keep the 486 up, what would
I do with that perfectly good ISA+microchannel SCSI card?
:-) PM
--
Paul Mackinney | Another look at Sept 11
[EMAIL
1 - 100 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
