On Fri, 2 Aug 2024, Tim Woodall wrote:
# Reading through this now I'm not absolutely sure that those hoops I
# jump throught to sign the repo are needed...
Just confirmed the gpg stuff is not needed
# Not sure why I have that proxy bit in here either. I think I'm
# installing from a file re
On Fri, 2 Aug 2024, daggs wrote:
Greetings,
I'm working on an automated Debian installation without network access.
I've discovered the --make-tarball and --unpack-tarball switches which I use to
create the tarball and use it as repo.
the initial deployment is this: debootstrap --
Greetings,
I'm working on an automated Debian installation without network access.
I've discovered the --make-tarball and --unpack-tarball switches which I use to
create the tarball and use it as repo.
the initial deployment is this: debootstrap --arch amd64 --unpack-tarball
/tmp/d
On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 10:22:56AM +0200, Mario Marietto wrote:
> ok. these works :
>
> debootstrap --foreign --arch=armhf jessie jessie-armhf
> http://archive.debian.org/debian
>
> debootstrap --foreign --arch=armhf strech strech-armhf
> http://archive.debian.org/deb
Hello,
El dom., 18 jun. 2023 10:23, Mario Marietto
escribió:
> ok. these works :
>
> debootstrap --foreign --arch=armhf jessie jessie-armhf
> http://archive.debian.org/debian
>
> debootstrap --foreign --arch=armhf strech strech-armhf
> http://archive.debian.org/de
ok. these works :
debootstrap --foreign --arch=armhf jessie jessie-armhf
http://archive.debian.org/debian
debootstrap --foreign --arch=armhf strech strech-armhf
http://archive.debian.org/debian
but not this :
root@marietto-Z87-HD3:/home/marietto/Scrivania/Chromebook/linux-distros#
debootstrap
Can you elaborate the full command ? thanks.
On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 10:12 AM Javier Barroso
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> El dom., 18 jun. 2023 9:56, Mario Marietto
> escribió:
>
>> I'm running Ubuntu 14.04 and I would like to debootstrap debian jessie 8.
>> I've
Hello,
El dom., 18 jun. 2023 9:56, Mario Marietto
escribió:
> I'm running Ubuntu 14.04 and I would like to debootstrap debian jessie 8.
> I've found this tutorial and I tried , but it didn't work :
>
> from here :
>
> https://blog.lazy-evaluation.net/posts/
I'm running Ubuntu 14.04 and I would like to debootstrap debian jessie 8.
I've found this tutorial and I tried , but it didn't work :
from here :
https://blog.lazy-evaluation.net/posts/linux/debian-armhf-bootstrap.html
he says to do :
# debootstrap --foreign --arch=armhf jess
Hello everyone,
I partly solved my problem and I would like to share my solution:
Until now, I thought that the EFI removable media path (\EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI)
is really a fallback location, i.e. a location for putting the boot loader that
just always works. Therefore I thought that I could fo
w that it works in principle. But now I want to
do it using command line utilities like debootstrap and grub-install."
But:
"the problem is that the ESC boot menu doesn't show an entry for
(the model name of) /dev/sda, so I can't boot into it."
My first question wo
On 26/04/2023 22:57, Valentin Caracalla wrote:
the issue with the BIOS boot interface (see my original posting) is still
unsolved
I had impression that there was no issue with booting in BIOS (legacy,
compatibility, CSM) mode, of course when it is chosen in firmware/BIOS
setup (requires disa
you just read this one post:
Hello everyone,
I want to install Debian on my Asus UX31A using command line utilities like
debootstrap and grub-install.
I want to install it to the internal drive /dev/sda, and I want to do so by
executing commands on an installer system, which is a system already
David Wright (12023-04-25):
> Don't knock it! The Human Era is much easier for us to parse than
;-)
> the French Republican calendar (pre 2018).
I had not realized I had fans devoted to the point of tracking the eras
of my mail attribution. ;-)²
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
De
Greg Wooledge (12023-04-25):
> find /mnt/boot/efi -exec ls -dl {} +
zsh
ls -dl /mnt/boot/efi/**/*
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed 26 Apr 2023 at 09:14:25 (+0700), Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 26/04/2023 00:42, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Steve McIntyre (12023-04-25):
[ … ]
> P.S. Nicolas, it seems your mailer has issues with parsing or
> formatting timestamps.
Don't knock it! The Human Era is much easier for us to parse th
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 09:34:11AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 26/04/2023 05:02, Valentin Caracalla wrote:
> >
> > user@host:~$ ls -dl $(find /mnt/boot/efi)
>
> find /mnt/boot/efi -print0 | xargs -0 ls -dl --
>
> should be more resistant to peculiar file names, but it does not matter in
> thi
On 26/04/2023 05:02, Valentin Caracalla wrote:
user@host:~$ ls -dl $(find /mnt/boot/efi)
find /mnt/boot/efi -print0 | xargs -0 ls -dl --
should be more resistant to peculiar file names, but it does not matter
in this case.
...
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 126 Apr 25 13:59 /mnt/boot/efi/EFI/
On 26/04/2023 00:42, Nicolas George wrote:
Steve McIntyre (12023-04-25):
If you do not intend to install a Microsoft bootloader or anything
besides GRUB, 16 megaoctets is plenty enough, probably can work with
less.
Please STOP giving this advice to people!
That was not advice, that was inform
Valentin Caracalla (12023-04-26):
> EFI variables are not supported on this system.
To install GRUB in UEFI, you need to have booted the kernel in UEFI.
Try to find a live image that does, and you can reinstall GRUB from
there.
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
Here's the output you requested:
user@host:~$ ls -dl $(find /mnt/boot/efi)
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 32768 Jan 1 1970 /mnt/boot/efi
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 32768 Apr 25 13:59 /mnt/boot/efi/EFI
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 32768 Apr 25 13:59 /mnt/boot/efi/EFI/debian
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 108
Steve McIntyre (12023-04-25):
> >If you do not intend to install a Microsoft bootloader or anything
> >besides GRUB, 16 megaoctets is plenty enough, probably can work with
> >less.
> Please STOP giving this advice to people!
That was not advice, that was information. Make your own advice with it.
Nicolas George wrote:
>Max Nikulin (12023-04-25):
>> 0.5GB is usually enough, e.g. 550MiB recommended by
>> https://www.rodsbooks.com/gdisk/advice.html#esp_sizing)
>
>If you do not intend to install a Microsoft bootloader or anything
>besides GRUB, 16 megaoctets is plenty enough, probably can work
Max Nikulin (12023-04-25):
> 0.5GB is usually enough, e.g. 550MiB recommended by
> https://www.rodsbooks.com/gdisk/advice.html#esp_sizing)
If you do not intend to install a Microsoft bootloader or anything
besides GRUB, 16 megaoctets is plenty enough, probably can work with
less.
Regards,
--
On 25/04/2023 21:40, Valentin Caracalla wrote:
I checked my partition table using "sudo parted /dev/sda print"
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 1049kB 128GB 128GB fat32 init boot, esp
2 128GB 256GB 128GB ext4 root
Please, show
vorubergeh...@tutanota.com wrote:
>By the way:
>
>The disadvantage of using EFI is that it doesn't work in QEMU, i.e. the
>following will not show a GRUB command line:
>
>sudo qemu-system-x86_64 -accel kvm -smp 2 -m 2G /dev/sda
>
>The same thing works for the BIOS boot interface, however (as in my
Valentin Caracalla (12023-04-25):
> The disadvantage of using EFI is that it doesn't work in QEMU, i.e. the
> following will not show a GRUB command line:
>
> sudo qemu-system-x86_64 -accel kvm -smp 2 -m 2G /dev/sda
Oh, I must check if the KVM virtual machine booting on UEFI I have been
toying w
By the way:
The disadvantage of using EFI is that it doesn't work in QEMU, i.e. the
following will not show a GRUB command line:
sudo qemu-system-x86_64 -accel kvm -smp 2 -m 2G /dev/sda
The same thing works for the BIOS boot interface, however (as in my original
recipe).
I apologize for the formatting in my last post, I don't know what happened. And
many thanks for your help!
I checked my partition table using "sudo parted /dev/sda print" and it didn't
show any flags for partition 1 (the "init" partition). Therefore I manually set
the flags using "sudo parted /
Valentin Caracalla writes:
> But this doesn't work either. Same problem here. However I can make
> such an EFI installation using official installation media on the same
> machine and that does work.
That recipe (and the whole post) was hard to read but don't you need
some flags for the ESP part
do parted /dev/sda mkpart init 0% 50% sudo
parted /dev/sda mkpart root 50% 100% sudo mkfs.vfat /dev/sda1 sudo mkfs.ext4
/dev/sda2 sudo mount /dev/sda2 /mnt sudo mkdir /mnt/boot sudo mkdir
/mnt/boot/efi sudo mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/boot/efi sudo debootstrap stable /mnt
sudo mount --bind /sys /mnt/sys su
There are a few things I forgot to say:
The recipe I posted earlier is executed on a system installed on the external
drive /dev/sdb, which I call the installer system. It is also a Debian system,
with the recipe's dependencies installed. To reproduce the issue (if you want),
I suggest using a
Valentin Caracalla writes:
> Previously, I've successfully installaed Debian using official
> installation media on this machine (also using BIOS boot interface),
> so I know that it works in principle.
I can't see anything wrong with the script. Did that installation use
GPT and a BIOS Boot Par
Hello everyone,
I'm trying to install Debian on my Asus UX31A using command line utilities like
debootstrap and grub-install. However, the installed system is not bootable.
The problem is that the internal drive (which I install the system to) doesn't
show up in the boot menu (whi
On 6/5/20 6:31 PM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
On 6/4/20 11:30 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Marc Shapiro wrote:
I also don't understand why it says that it could not create temporary
files in /tmp. I am running this as root and /tmp is owned by root.
What am I missing?
/tmp (and /var/tmp/) should have th
On 6/4/20 11:30 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
Marc Shapiro wrote:
I also don't understand why it says that it could not create temporary
files in /tmp. I am running this as root and /tmp is owned by root.
What am I missing?
/tmp (and /var/tmp/) should have the following permissions and rights:
r
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:30:16AM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Marc Shapiro wrote:
>
> > I also don't understand why it says that it could not create temporary
> > files in /tmp. I am running this as root and /tmp is owned by root.
> > What am I missing?
>
> /tmp (and /var/tmp/) should have
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:30:16AM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Marc Shapiro wrote:
>>> I also don't understand why it says that it could not create temporary
>>> files in /tmp. I am running this as root and /tmp is owned by root.
>>> What am I missing?
>>
>> /tmp (a
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 08:30:16AM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Marc Shapiro wrote:
>
> > I also don't understand why it says that it could not create temporary
> > files in /tmp. I am running this as root and /tmp is owned by root.
> > What am I missing?
>
> /tmp (and /var/tmp/) should have
Marc Shapiro wrote:
> I also don't understand why it says that it could not create temporary
> files in /tmp. I am running this as root and /tmp is owned by root.
> What am I missing?
/tmp (and /var/tmp/) should have the following permissions and rights:
root:root 1777/drwxrwxrwt
apt runs
I have just installed Buster on a spare set of partitions using
debootstrap, as documented in:
Appendix D.3 of the Installation Guide.
When I got to configuring networking, I just copied
/etc/networking/interfaces, /etc/hosts, /etc/hostname, and
/etc/resolv.conf from my Stretch
n.org/855234 <https://bugs.debian.org/829134>
(libsystemd-shared wanted to be found as well).
Thanks for your help,
Christoph
Hi,
>
> (please CC me, I'm not subscribed to d-user@l.d.o)
>
> Quoting Christoph Müllner (2020-02-09 12:54:56)
> > I'd like to run the s
Hi Hector,
thanks for the pointer to debos.
That tool seems to fit quite well (especially the ability to invoke user
scripts for customizations),
although access to /dev/kvm is quite some price to pay (but already much
much better than root rights).
Thanks a lot,
Christoph
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at
)
> > I'd like to run the second stage of debootstrap without root rights,
> > but for another architecture (host is x86_64 and target is arm64).
> >
> > I know how to do all that with root rights (i.e qemu-aarch64-static
> > works perfectly here, also, I can
Hello Christoph,
Missatge de Christoph Müllner del dia dg., 9
de febr. 2020 a les 12:55:
> I was expecting that fakechroot and fakeroot will do the necessary "magic"
> to make chroot work for my use-case, but that's not the case (I need to have
> libfakeroot.so
> and libfakechroot.so in the tar
Hi,
(please CC me, I'm not subscribed to d-user@l.d.o)
Quoting Christoph Müllner (2020-02-09 12:54:56)
> I'd like to run the second stage of debootstrap without root rights, but for
> another architecture (host is x86_64 and target is arm64).
>
> I know how to do all that
[ sent again, without 8bit headers to please Debian MTAs ]
Hi Christoph,
Quoting Christoph Müllner (2020-02-09 12:54:56)
> I'd like to run the second stage of debootstrap without root rights,
> but for another architecture (host is x86_64 and target is arm64).
>
> I know h
Hi Debian users,
I'd like to run the second stage of debootstrap without root rights,
but for another architecture (host is x86_64 and target is arm64).
I know how to do all that with root rights (i.e qemu-aarch64-static works
perfectly here,
also, I can recommend using qemu-debootstrap),
ash
> Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
> LSM: AppArmor: enabled
>
> Run the command:
> fakeroot fakechroot debootstrap --verbose --variant=fakechroot
> buster ${WORKSPACE}/buster
>
> Ends up with a lot of warnings
> dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency
the command:
fakeroot fakechroot debootstrap --verbose --variant=fakechroot
buster ${WORKSPACE}/buster
Ends up with a lot of warnings
dpkg: warning: ignoring pre-dependency problem!
And fails finally with a lot of errors with this pattern
On 04/29/2018 07:11 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 06:43:42AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 04/29/2018 12:59 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 04/28/2018 10:57 PM, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
You can try it out to verify after you fix the mount options to not
include nodev.
Hi Richard,
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 06:43:42AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 04/29/2018 12:59 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >On 04/28/2018 10:57 PM, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> >>You can try it out to verify after you fix the mount options to not
> >>include nodev.
[…]
> The man page for mount hin
On 04/29/2018 12:59 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 04/28/2018 10:57 PM, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
Richard Owlett writes:
On 04/27/2018 12:06 PM, Felix Dietrich wrote:
[SNIP]
Script started on Fri 27 Apr 2018 02:22:42 PM CDT
ls -Rdl /media/root/rco1
ls -Rdl /usr/sbin/debootstrap
ls -Rdl
On 04/28/2018 10:57 PM, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
Richard Owlett writes:
On 04/27/2018 12:06 PM, Felix Dietrich wrote:
[SNIP]
Do not specify „--print-debs” if you want „debootstrap” to install the
packages.
*BINGO*
Proofreading one's own work is intrinsically error prone ;/
B
Richard Owlett writes:
> On 04/27/2018 12:06 PM, Felix Dietrich wrote:
>>[SNIP]
>>
>> Do not specify „--print-debs” if you want „debootstrap” to install the
>> packages.
>
> *BINGO*
> Proofreading one's own work is intrinsically error prone ;/
On 04/27/2018 09:54 AM, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, April 27, 2018 10:16:22 AM Richard Owlett wrote:
I thought I was doing that. My TARGET is "/media/richard/rco" where
"rco" is the label of a partition on the flash drive.
Just chiming in from left field: have you mounted that partiti
On 04/27/2018 12:06 PM, Felix Dietrich wrote:
[SNIP]
Do not specify „--print-debs” if you want „debootstrap” to install the
packages.
*BINGO*
Proofreading one's own work is intrinsically error prone ;/
But it doesn't solve all my problems. Captured the session with
SCRIPT(1).
Richard Owlett writes:
> On 04/25/2018 09:19 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> My goal is a very minimalist install to a flash drive. It will NOT
>> have GRUB - GRUB on this machine is on a dedicated partition for
>> convenience in some of my experiments.
>
> Doing:
Richard Owlett wrote:
> The error message when attempting "debootstrap --second-stage" is
> "cat: /usr/share/debootstrap/suite: No such file or directory".
I don't recall to be using second stage. I just make debootstrap with
perhaps architecture and I think
On Friday, April 27, 2018 10:16:22 AM Richard Owlett wrote:
> I thought I was doing that. My TARGET is "/media/richard/rco" where
> "rco" is the label of a partition on the flash drive.
Just chiming in from left field: have you mounted that partition?
On 04/27/2018 08:49 AM, deloptes wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
QUESTION:
Has anyone personally used debootstrap to install to a flash drive?
I do install in a directory and then copy the content to the flash drive
then chroot and make it bootable
I was installing to the flash drive because
Richard Owlett wrote:
> QUESTION:
> Has anyone personally used debootstrap to install to a flash drive?
I do install in a directory and then copy the content to the flash drive
then chroot and make it bootable
alternatively you ma install into directory where flash drive is mounted an
On 04/27/2018 08:00 AM, songbird wrote:
Richard Owlett wrote:
...
QUESTION:
Has anyone personally used debootstrap to install to a flash drive?
not yet... :)
i'm currently having other bigger fish to fry...
My environment is:
OS is i386 Debian stable
DVD is DVD-1 of D
Richard Owlett wrote:
...
> QUESTION:
> Has anyone personally used debootstrap to install to a flash drive?
not yet... :)
i'm currently having other bigger fish to fry...
> My environment is:
>OS is i386 Debian stable
>DVD is DVD-1 of Debian 9.1.0
>Flas
On 04/27/2018 06:38 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
Doing:
debootstrap --verbose --arch=i386 --include=apt-get --variant=minbase
--no-check-gpg --print-debs --keep-debootstrap-dir stable
/media/richard/rco
file:media/cdrom0/debian/
generates no error messages.
HOWEVER, very few files are
:
debootstrap --arch=i386 --include=apt-get --variant=minbase
--no-check-gpg --print-debs --keep-debootstrap-dir stable
/media/richard/rco /media/cdrom0/
I have two questions:
1. What should replace "" as I'll be using DVD1 of Debian 9.1.0
as my "repository"?
2
answer for the sake of the answer.
sometimes it is really frustrating how one can not understand obvious
things, however not all are same age, have same background or level of
intelligence.
its better you give example in such case
debootstrap [OPTION...] stable /mypath/to/target/installation file
On 04/26/2018 02:39 PM, Felix Dietrich wrote:
deloptes writes:
its better you give example in such case
debootstrap [OPTION...] stable /mypath/to/target/installation file:///DVD1
this is how I understand it, correct if I'm wrong
Almost: as has been stated elsewhere in this threa
have same background or level of
> > intelligence.
> >
> > its better you give example in such case
> >
> > debootstrap [OPTION...] stable /mypath/to/target/installation file:///DVD1
> >
> > this is how I understand it, correct if I'm wr
deloptes writes:
> its better you give example in such case
>
> debootstrap [OPTION...] stable /mypath/to/target/installation file:///DVD1
>
> this is how I understand it, correct if I'm wrong
Almost: as has been stated elsewhere in this thread, at least according
to Appe
stions or to answer for the sake of the answer.
>
> sometimes it is really frustrating how one can not understand obvious
> things, however not all are same age, have same background or level of
> intelligence.
>
> its better you give example in such case
>
> debootstrap
tand obvious
things, however not all are same age, have same background or level of
intelligence.
its better you give example in such case
debootstrap [OPTION...] stable /mypath/to/target/installation file:///DVD1
this is how I understand it, correct if I'm wrong
regards
mmand should be:
>
> debootstrap --arch=i386 --include=apt-get --variant=minbase
> --no-check-gpg --print-debs --keep-debootstrap-dir stable
> /media/richard/rco /media/cdrom0/
> I have two questions:
>1. What should replace "" as I'll be using DVD1 of
but, start a new thread, as what you're looking for is
presumably not related to Using debootstrap
On 04/25/2018 11:03 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
... I meant a script(1) session. Sorry. But I bet screen also has
some logging capabilities, if you want to do it that way.
As the man page says:
It is useful for students who need a hardcopy record of an interactive
session as proof of an assignm
On 04/25/2018 10:47 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 06:45:32PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:19:13 -0500 Richard Owlett said:
I have two questions:
1. What should replace "" as I'll be using DVD1 of Debian 9.1.0
as my "repository"?
On 04/25/2018 10:45 AM, Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:19:13 -0500 Richard Owlett said:
I have two questions:
1. What should replace "" as I'll be using DVD1 of Debian 9.1.0
as my "repository"?
2. As I expect the console display may exceed the scroll back
Henning Follmann writes:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:19:13AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> From reading several references I believe my command should be:
>>
>> debootstrap --arch=i386 --include=apt-get --variant=minbase --no-check-gpg
>> --print-debs --keep-de
> From reading several references I believe my command should be:
>
> debootstrap --arch=i386 --include=apt-get --variant=minbase \
> --no-check-gpg --print-debs --keep-debootstrap-dir stable \
> /media/richard/rco /media/cdrom0/
> What should replace "&qu
... I meant a script(1) session. Sorry. But I bet screen also has
some logging capabilities, if you want to do it that way.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 06:45:32PM +0300, Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:19:13 -0500 Richard Owlett said:
>
> > I have two questions:
> >1. What should replace "" as I'll be using DVD1 of Debian 9.1.0
> > as my "repository"?
> >2. As I expect the console dis
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:19:13 -0500 Richard Owlett said:
> I have two questions:
>1. What should replace "" as I'll be using DVD1 of Debian 9.1.0
> as my "repository"?
>2. As I expect the console display may exceed the scroll back limits,
> I wish to pipe the console display
; GRUB
> > > - GRUB on this machine is on a dedicated partition for convenience in some
> > > of my experiments.
> > >
> > > From reading several references I believe my command should be:
> > >
> > > debootstrap --arch=i386 --include=apt-get
reading several references I believe my command should be:
debootstrap --arch=i386 --include=apt-get --variant=minbase --no-check-gpg
--print-debs --keep-debootstrap-dir stable /media/richard/rco
/media/cdrom0/
I have two questions:
1. What should replace "" as I'll be using
ieve my command should be:
>
> debootstrap --arch=i386 --include=apt-get --variant=minbase --no-check-gpg
> --print-debs --keep-debootstrap-dir stable /media/richard/rco
> /media/cdrom0/
>
> I have two questions:
> 1. What should replace "" as I'll be
My goal is a very minimalist install to a flash drive. It will NOT have
GRUB - GRUB on this machine is on a dedicated partition for convenience
in some of my experiments.
From reading several references I believe my command should be:
debootstrap --arch=i386 --include=apt-get --variant
Richard Owlett wrote:
> I suspect the first is closer to my mental image. Did you use
> debootstrap with --variant=minbase, grml-debootstrap with --nopackages,
> OR something else?
For the first to work, I just copy the boot directory to the card/usb stick
and make it bootable (gru
On 04/15/2018 03:58 PM, Brian wrote:
On Sun 15 Apr 2018 at 14:19:50 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 04/15/2018 12:43 PM, Brian wrote:
On Sun 15 Apr 2018 at 08:55:45 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
What are the trade-offs of choosing between debootstrap and grml-debootstap?
I understand that
On Sun 15 Apr 2018 at 14:19:50 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 04/15/2018 12:43 PM, Brian wrote:
> > On Sun 15 Apr 2018 at 08:55:45 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > >
> > > What are the trade-offs of choosing between debootstrap and
> > > grml-debootstap?
On 04/15/2018 02:32 PM, Forest Dean Feighner wrote:
Could you skip all that and use something like busybox or buildroot?
I hadn't recalled either at the moment. Busybox might have an edge as it
in the Debian repository {and I even have it installed - will have to
investigate why I installed i
t; > "bonkers".
>
> ROFL <*GRIN*>
> "bonkers" implies "not of sound mind.
> "idiosyncratic" explicitly states my assumption that no-one else may
> have _exactly_ my goals
>
> >
> > apt is Priority: important. Try removing it fro
definition of "minimalist" is of no importance
or consequence.
To you, likely .
BTW, you just reminded me that apt has a "purge" command.
If DEBOOTSTRAP / GRML-DEBOOTSTRAP installs "cruft", that could be useful.
Might even attempt using apt to remove itself ;/
Suggested
way and less consuming space. I used such
approach with very old 256MB SD card to boot raspberry that runs fon NFS
root.
if you want some minimal rescue disk debootstrap would work or some kind of
minimalistic distro - as grub is almost everywhere the same. I checked SLAX
recently - just dd the iso
with
"bonkers".
apt is Priority: important. Try removing it from any Debian system.
For installing, your definition of "minimalist" is of no importance
or consequence.
> For my definitely idiosyncratic purposes *absolutely NOTHING* but grub
> related tools will _ever_ be
d such
approach with very old 256MB SD card to boot raspberry that runs fon NFS
root.
if you want some minimal rescue disk debootstrap would work or some kind of
minimalistic distro - as grub is almost everywhere the same. I checked SLAX
recently - just dd the iso to usb and done. total size of dist
"--variant=minbase" which apparently installs apt. My definition of
"minimalist" would prefer not to.
For my definitely idiosyncratic purposes *absolutely NOTHING* but grub
related tools will _ever_ be run from this device.
What are the trade-offs of choosing between
e.
>
> My gut feeling is you can not force it to work unless you rebuild
> initrd.
>
>
>>>> I learn the method from the following website:
>>>>
>>>> https://www.collabora.com/news-and-blog/blog/2017/01/16/setting-up-qemu-kvm-for-kernel-development/
&
up-qemu-kvm-for-kernel-development/
> I'm genuinely surprised that such method worked for them.
I have learned how to use busybox as basic environment.
Is that any tutorial to show how to make debian debootstrap image as
basic environment?
>
> Reco
--
My best regards to you.
No System Is Safe!
Dongliang Mu
od from the following website:
> >>
> >> https://www.collabora.com/news-and-blog/blog/2017/01/16/setting-up-qemu-kvm-for-kernel-development/
> > I'm genuinely surprised that such method worked for them.
> I have learned how to use busybox as basic environment.
> Is that any tutorial to show how to make debian debootstrap image as
> basic environment?
apt-get install vmdebootstrap
man vmdebootstrap -- search for SYNOPSIS
Reco
On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 19:07 +, 慕 冬亮 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The image created by debootstrap does not work in the qemu
[...]
debootstrap doesn't create images, your script does - so that's where
the bug is.
Rather than trying to fix your script, why not try vmdebootstrap wh
1 - 100 of 398 matches
Mail list logo
