I have been trying different email programs. None of them seem to let me
reply to a particular message in the digest. Almost all of the ones I
tried so far, when you hit the reply button, copies the *entire* digest
into the compose window instead of only the message you wish to reply
to. Some o
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 17:39:56 -0600, djhack wrote:
>I have been trying different email programs. None of them seem to let
>me reply to a particular message in the digest. Almost all of the ones
>I tried so far, when you hit the reply button, copies the *entire*
>digest into the compose window in
On 07/26/2006 06:39 PM, djhack wrote:
I have been trying different email programs. None of them
seem to let me reply to a particular message in the digest.
Almost all of the ones I tried so far, when you hit the
reply button, copies the *entire* digest into the compose
window instead of only the
djhack wrote:
> Kmail - Configured it, and got test messages in and out then it started
> to complain the POP3 was broken. Never got any messages from the list.
> Could not get it going again.
This is not good attitude -- try to find out what's the problem and make it
work. We can help you with it
djhack wrote:
I have been trying different email programs. None of them seem to let me
reply to a particular message in the digest. Almost all of the ones I
tried so far, when you hit the reply button, copies the *entire* digest
into the compose window instead of only the message you wish to re
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 10:48:07AM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote:
> djhack wrote:
> > Kmail - Configured it, and got test messages in and out then it started
> > to complain the POP3 was broken. Never got any messages from the list.
> > Could not get it going again.
>
> This is not good attitude -- try
Am 2006-07-26 17:39:56, schrieb djhack:
> Thunderbird - Copies entire message at reply. Works fine on my box.
> Balsa - Copies entire message at reply. I have tried the suggested "Ctrl
> Kmail - Configured it, and got test messages in and out then it started
> Evolution - Configured it, and got
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Greetings
> Michelle Konzack
> Systemadministrator
> Tamay Dogan Network
> Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
>
As a friendly suggestion, would it be acceptable to you to move your
shameless plug to at least the signature-level? I'd like to filter
non-relevant por
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Am 2006-07-26 17:39:56, schrieb djhack:
> >
> > Balsa - Copies entire message at reply. I have tried the suggested "Ctrl
>
> Those are not MUA's but nightmares
>
> Try Mutt ;-)
I'm a mutt user myself, but balsa's not bad if you insist on a GUI
MUA.
Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> Thunderbird - Copies entire message at reply. Works fine on my box.
>> Balsa - Copies entire message at reply. I have tried the suggested "Ctrl
>> Kmail - Configured it, and got test messages in and out then it started
>> Evolution - Configured it, and got test messages i
Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >> Thunderbird - Copies entire message at reply. Works fine on my box.
> >> Balsa - Copies entire message at reply. I have tried the suggested "Ctrl
> >> Kmail - Configured it, and got test messages in and out then it started
> >> Evoluti
s. keeling wrote:
Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Thunderbird - Copies entire message at reply. Works fine on my box.
Balsa - Copies entire message at reply. I have tried the suggested "Ctrl
Kmail - Configured it, and got test messages in and out then it started
s. keeling wrote:
> mutt "lacking"?!? And you accuse Michelle of being a troll?!? You're
> an idiot. HTH. Twit.
Ah, yes, the rational response. Sorry, Mutt does lack.
It lacks the ability to use the SMTP interface to send mail, being
restricted to the command line to get the job done
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
s. keeling wrote:
> Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Michelle Konzack wrote:
[snip]
> mutt "lacking"?!? And you accuse Michelle of being a troll?!? You're
> an idiot. HTH. Twit.
That was un-called for.
Mutt is *definitely* lacking. In design.
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> s. keeling wrote:
> > mutt "lacking"?!? And you accuse Michelle of being a troll?!? You're
> > an idiot. HTH. Twit.
>
> Ah, yes, the rational response. Sorry, Mutt does lack.
>
> It lacks the ability to use the SMTP interface to send mail, being
>
s. keeling wrote:
> You have a ridiculously complicated "system" for organizing your mail,
> and it's mutt's fault for doing what it does well. No.
Sorry for previous flame -- I cannot resist, but I am serious -- mutt is
lacking. It is not its mistake, it is by design, which has its advantages,
b
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 01:25:46PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote:
> s. keeling wrote:
> > You have a ridiculously complicated "system" for organizing your mail,
> > and it's mutt's fault for doing what it does well. No.
>
> Sorry for previous flame -- I cannot resist, but I am serious -- mutt is
> lack
On 08/26/2006 11:10 AM, s. keeling wrote:
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
s. keeling wrote:
mutt "lacking"?!? And you accuse Michelle of being a troll?!? You're
an idiot. HTH. Twit.
Ah, yes, the rational response. Sorry, Mutt does lack.
It lacks the ability to use the SMTP inte
s. keeling wrote:
> Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> It lacks the ability to use the SMTP interface to send mail, being
>> restricted to the command line to get the job done.
> It's an MUA. Use SMTP.
Exactly. I would love to but it can't.
>> It lacks filtering.
> Like a washi
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 05:14:27PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> s. keeling wrote:
> > Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> It lacks the ability to use the SMTP interface to send mail, being
> >> restricted to the command line to get the job done.
>
> > It's an MUA. Use SMTP.
>
> Exactly.
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 01:50:09PM -0500, Mumia W. wrote:
> On 08/26/2006 11:10 AM, s. keeling wrote:
> >Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>s. keeling wrote:
> >>>mutt "lacking"?!? And you accuse Michelle of being a troll?!? You're
> >>>an idiot. HTH. Twit.
> >> Ah, yes, the rational respo
Andreas Rippl wrote:
> Generally I tink that it boils down to your requirements in a MUA. I
Of course there is one thing which has to be admitted to mutt -- its ability
to go be used through ssh. I use it sometimes when I need it, and it is by
far the best alternative of that (don't start me to co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matej Cepl wrote:
> Andreas Rippl wrote:
>> Generally I tink that it boils down to your requirements in a MUA. I
>
> Of course there is one thing which has to be admitted to mutt -- its ability
> to go be used through ssh. I use it sometimes when I ne
Matej Cepl wrote:
Andreas Rippl wrote:
Generally I tink that it boils down to your requirements in a MUA. I
Of course there is one thing which has to be admitted to mutt -- its ability
to go be used through ssh. I use it sometimes when I need it, and it is by
far the best alternative o
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 08:45:32AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Matej Cepl wrote:
> > Andreas Rippl wrote:
> >> Generally I tink that it boils down to your requirements in a MUA. I
> >
> > Of course there is one thing which has to be admitted to
Paul Scott wrote:
> I do this routinely with Thunderbird.
You mean ssh -X? How fast is your connection between the Internet and the
ssh server?
Matěj
--
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
23 Marion St. #3,
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> s. keeling wrote:
> > Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> It lacks the ability to use the SMTP interface to send mail, being
> >> restricted to the command line to get the job done.
>
> > It's an MUA. Use SMTP.
>
> Exactly. I would love to but it c
On 26.08.06 03:55, Steve Lamb wrote:
> s. keeling wrote:
> > mutt "lacking"?!? And you accuse Michelle of being a troll?!? You're
> > an idiot. HTH. Twit.
>
> Ah, yes, the rational response. Sorry, Mutt does lack.
>
> It lacks the ability to use the SMTP interface to send mail, being
s. keeling wrote:
> Mine uses exim and fetchmail all the time.
Which doesn't count if exim's on another box.
> Filtering does not belong in the client. mutt's an MUA. It calls
> filtering programs to do filtering, as it should.
Filtering belongs in the client if one is receiving mail v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 08:45:32AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Matej Cepl wrote:
Andreas Rippl wrote:
> Generally I tink that it boils down to your requirements in a MUA. I
Of course there is one thing which has
Matej Cepl wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
I do this routinely with Thunderbird.
You mean ssh -X?
Yes.
How fast is your connection between the Internet and the ssh server?
256K bits/sec. It's not great but it works. I know I need to set up an
IMAP server or at least have fetchmail br
Paul Scott wrote:
> The slowness of Thunderbird in this setup is worth it with as many mail
> folders as I have. I can tell at a glance which folders have unread
> mail in them. How would I do that with mutt?
You don't. There's a command that can kinda show you but you have to tap
it consta
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:23:59PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Scott wrote:
> > The slowness of Thunderbird in this setup is worth it with as many mail
> > folders as I have. I can tell at a glance which folders have unread
> > mail in them. How would I do that with mutt?
>
> You don't.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:23:59PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Paul Scott wrote:
>>> The slowness of Thunderbird in this setup is worth it with as many mail
>>> folders as I have. I can tell at a glance which folders have u
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 10:04:03PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:23:59PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> >> Paul Scott wrote:
> >>> The slowness of Thunderbird in this setup is worth it with as many mail
> >>> folders as I have. I can tell at a gla
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 10:04:03PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:23:59PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Paul Scott wrote:
[snip]
>>> But mutt-ng, which includes th
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 10:14:42PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 10:04:03PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:23:59PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Scott wrote:
> [snip]
>
> >>>
* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [26-08-2006 05:57:04 -0500]:
> Mutt is *definitely* lacking. In design.
Yes, mutt is lacking if you compare it with e.g. KMail because mutt is
only a MUA, which requires the services of a MTA (sendmail or such) for
delivering the mail (via SMTP) and fetchmail/sen
Martin Möller wrote:
> One could ask of course, if the whole mta,mda,mua concept is too complex
> and time-consuming for a single user wanting to read his mail. One could
> also ask if the whole debian concept is too complex for a single user
> who just wants to write a letter and print it out. Win
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Möller wrote:
> * Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [26-08-2006 05:57:04
> -0500]:
>> Mutt is *definitely* lacking. In design.
>
> Yes, mutt is lacking if you compare it with e.g. KMail because
No, that's not what I'm talking about.
I assert t
It lacks a folders column and hebrew support ...
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 23:29:51 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26.08.06 03:55, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > s. keeling wrote:
> > > mutt "lacking"?!? And you accuse Michelle of being a troll?!? You're
> > > an idiot. HTH. Tw
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 12:23:19PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> It lacks a folders column and hebrew support ...
>
Not sure about Hebrew and other non-Latin-character languages, but the
folder column is available in mutt-ng. Unfortunately there are many
nifty patches out there which have necessit
Am 2006-08-25 03:40:08, schrieb s. keeling:
> I'm a mutt user myself, but balsa's not bad if you insist on a GUI
> MUA. I'm not very knowledgable about what it really can do (verify
> gpg, thread, etc), but it was relatively usable when I found myself
> forced to use it. I agree with your other
Am 2006-08-25 10:35:16, schrieb Matej Cepl:
> I have used mutt for couple of years and found it lacking so I switched to
> kmail, which is much powerful for my purposes. Aside from being troll and
> self-promoting ass, what do you know about these other MUAs that you can
> talk about them so autho
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:17:34 +0200
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunatly I must install then a my customers...
>
> ;-)
>
> ...since you can not give a Office-Worker in an Insurance or
> Enterprise mutt to work. They have not the "head" for such MUS's.
> - I's to heavy.
>
>
On 28.08.06 12:23, Micha Feigin wrote:
> It lacks a folders column and hebrew support ...
And which one of the features I asked below does this belong under?
Could you next time quote exactly the part of my mail so I know?
Sorry, I know mutt does not have "folders column" but I have neved needed
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:23:59PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> You don't. There's a command that can kinda show you but you have to tap
> it constantly for it to update. There is no auto-updating new mail list.
Mutt can't directly show you new mail in an IMAP store. True enough. It
has no t
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:15:25 +0200
Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 2006-08-25 03:40:08, schrieb s. keeling:
>
> > I'm a mutt user myself, but balsa's not bad if you insist on a GUI
> > MUA. I'm not very knowledgable about what it really can do (verify
> > gpg, thread, etc), but
Ron Johnson down in the bayou wrote:
>Showing my grey beard: WordStar was excellently-designed TUI
>software. All was based on the keyborad "home row", most commands
>were 2 strokes: "group"+"command". Help screens were layered and
>rational. You could have help *always* on half the screen,
>*t
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:44:12 +0300
Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sylpheed claws has some issues with selecting messages for
> deletion using the keyboard (for deleting a group of messages),
> but it may be a problem with my setup (it doesn't seem like
> whoever looked at the bug didn't
Raquel wrote:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:44:12 +0300
Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sylpheed claws has some issues with selecting messages for
deletion using the keyboard (for deleting a group of messages),
but it may be a problem with my setup (it doesn't seem like
whoever looked at t
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:20:03 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 28.08.06 12:23, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > It lacks a folders column and hebrew support ...
>
> And which one of the features I asked below does this belong under?
> Could you next time quote exactly the part o
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:58:31 -0700
Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:44:12 +0300
> Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sylpheed claws has some issues with selecting messages for
> > deletion using the keyboard (for deleting a group of messages),
> > but it may b
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:11:05 -0700
Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >I've chosen not to use "claws" because of things I didn't like
> >about it, including some things I thought were "bugs". I use the
> >plain vanilla Sylpheed.
> >
> >
> Does Sylpheed handle mbox style mailboxes, ye
Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raquel wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 21:44:12 +0300
> >Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Sylpheed claws has some issues with selecting messages for
> >>deletion using the keyboard (for deleting a group of messages),
> >>but it ma
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:13:39PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> But I have messages separated into about a dozen folders (I know of people who
> use more). I want to know which one has new mail, I want to read the mail in
> the important folders before mailing lists, usually I want to know if I hav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:23:59PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> You don't. There's a command that can kinda show you but you have to tap
>> it constantly for it to update. There is no auto-updating new mail list.
>
> Mutt can
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:37:50 -0700
Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:11:05 -0700
> Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > >I've chosen not to use "claws" because of things I didn't like
> > >about it, including some things I thought were "bugs". I use the
>
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:00:54 -0600
Rob Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:13:39PM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> > But I have messages separated into about a dozen folders (I know of people
> > who use more). I want to know which one has new mail, I want to read the
> > mai
Rob Sims wrote:
> In mutt, 'y' gives me a list of folders and a message count per folder.
Yes, now update it... without touching the keyboard... Whoops.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:23:59PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> You don't. There's a command that can kinda show you but you have to tap
>> it constantly for it to update. There is no auto-updating new mail list.
> Mutt can't directly show you new mail in an IMAP store.
Gnu-Raiz wrote:
> the big deal. With googles new software such as writely, and their
> spreadsheet program, you won't need to save anything to your home
> system harddrive anyway.
Other than those pesky privacy issues.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
Steve Lamb wrote:
Gnu-Raiz wrote:
the big deal. With googles new software such as writely, and their
spreadsheet program, you won't need to save anything to your home
system harddrive anyway.
Other than those pesky privacy issues.
Well, Steve, I'm actually with you on this one.
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:58:14AM +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:00:54 -0600
> Rob Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In mutt, 'y' gives me a list of folders and a message count per folder.
>
> Last time I worked with mutt I didn't see this
This is why mutt has documenta
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 04:54:06PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Filtering belongs in the client if one is receiving mail via POP, which is
> a part of the client.
I'm still trying to figure this one out. You think filtering belongs on
the client, yet you read mail from multiple locations and us
Marc Wilson wrote:
> I'm still trying to figure this one out. You think filtering belongs on
> the client, yet you read mail from multiple locations and use IMAP. How do
> you reconcile the two? Use offlineimap everywhere?
No. Just because I think filtering belongs in the client doesn't me
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 05:39:56PM -0600, djhack wrote:
> Thunderbird - Copies entire message at reply. Works fine on my box.
For all you thunderbird users...
1) when will thunderbird finally gain "reply to list"? I could have sworn
I saw a patch go by not too long ago somewhere.
2) if a messag
Hello Marc.
> 1) when will thunderbird finally gain "reply to list"? I could have sworn
> I saw a patch go by not too long ago somewhere.
Officially with version 3.0. But the mentioned patch is included in TB 1.5.0.5
thanks to
the TB package maintainers.
Regards, Mathias
PS: Yep, I „replied
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:10:34AM +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Hello Marc.
>
> > 1) when will thunderbird finally gain "reply to list"? I could have sworn
> > I saw a patch go by not too long ago somewhere.
>
> Officially with version 3.0. But the mentioned patch is included in TB
> 1.5.0.5
Hello Marc.
>> But the mentioned patch is included in TB 1.5.0.5 thanks
>> to the TB package maintainers.
>
> And, of course, there's no documentation provided anywhere of how to use it.
I think it is not very difficult to search for „thunderbird reply-to-list“ via
$searchengine and find Peter M
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 07:00:26PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 05:39:56PM -0600, djhack wrote:
> > Thunderbird - Copies entire message at reply. Works fine on my box.
>
> For all you thunderbird users...
Forgot one:
5) when will Mozilla-based applications finally start cr
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:36:48PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Oddly enough I open up Thunderbird which connects to my IMAP store and it
> knows how much new mail is in each folder without me going into them.
Of course this process works *so* well in thunderbird that not only is
there a setting
Marc Wilson wrote:
> 1) when will thunderbird finally gain "reply to list"? I could have sworn
> I saw a patch go by not too long ago somewhere.
Against the next major release. Which was part of the patch notes from
the onset.
> 3) How do I tell thunderbird to stop with its idiotic represen
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:10:34AM +0200, Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Hello Marc.
>
> > 1) when will thunderbird finally gain "reply to list"? I could have sworn
> > I saw a patch go by not too long ago somewhere.
>
> Officially with version 3.0. But the mentioned patch is included in TB
> 1.5.0.5
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 07:00:26PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 05:39:56PM -0600, djhack wrote:
> > Thunderbird - Copies entire message at reply. Works fine on my box.
>
> For all you thunderbird users...
And another one...
6) dialogs that obviously need scroll bars that d
Marc Wilson wrote:
> Oh, no... not at all. Thunderbird doesn't require *any* fiddling
> whatsoever.
I never said that, nice strawman.
> Feh. Who does Steve Lamb think he's kidding, anyway?
No one. I stand by what I said. I've never once led on that TBird
doesn't have warts. But cosm
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 08:15:11PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > 4) how can I cause thunderbird to automatically purge a set of mail folders
> > according to a set of rules? Or does that require one of those pesky
> > additional programs? What if the mail isn't local?
>
> Uhhh, right click?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:36:48PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
[snip]
> We'll leave aside the asinine idea that a collapsed message
> thread with new messages in it is not itself highlighted like the
> unread messages are.
Such threa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 07:00:26PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 05:39:56PM -0600, djhack wrote:
>>> Thunderbird - Copies entire message at reply. Works fine on my box.
>> For all you thunderbird users...
>
Marc Wilson wrote:
> Uhhh, no. Either you delete all but the last n messages, or you delete
> messages older than n days. That's not "according to a set of rules".
> That's remarkably inflexible.
That is according to a set of rules. A limited set of rules but those
*are* rules.
> Oh, and a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 05:39:56PM -0600, djhack wrote:
>> Thunderbird - Copies entire message at reply. Works fine on my box.
>
> For all you thunderbird users...
>
> 1) when will thunderbird finally gain "reply to list"? I cou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Marc Wilson wrote:
>> Uhhh, no. Either you delete all but the last n messages, or you delete
>> messages older than n days. That's not "according to a set of rules".
>> That's remarkably inflexible.
>
> That is according to a
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Steve Lamb wrote:
>> That is according to a set of rules. A limited set of rules but those
>> *are* rules.
> You just pulled a "Paul". Didn't just move to Oregon, did you?
That's not a Paul. If you note the Marc asked for "a set of rules".
Those are a set of rules.
On 08/28/2006 10:09 PM, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:36:48PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
Oddly enough I open up Thunderbird which connects to my IMAP store and it
knows how much new mail is in each folder without me going into them.
Of course this process works *so* well in t
Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Officially with version 3.0. But the mentioned patch is included in TB
> 1.5.0.5 thanks to the TB package maintainers.
Oh my, Mathias, thank you for mentioning this. 10 seconds later and one
less wart on Thunderbird.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Mathias Brodala wrote:
>> Officially with version 3.0. But the mentioned patch is included in TB
>> 1.5.0.5 thanks to the TB package maintainers.
>
> Oh my, Mathias, thank you for mentioning this. 10 seconds later and one
> le
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 05:36:48PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Marc Wilson wrote:
> > Whenever *I* go back to my folder list, new is clearly marked.
>
> Just wait, it won't.
Yes, it will. If it doesn't, then your filesystem is probably mounted
noatime. Mutt uses the filesystem's atime to deter
Hello Marc.
>> […] the mentioned patch is included in TB 1.5.0.5 thanks to
>> the TB package maintainers.
>
> And what arcana are necessary to make it *work*, other than installing
> Enigmail and Reply-To-List? All of Debian's mailing lists include
> List-Post:, but none of them are apparently a
CJ van den Berg wrote:
> Yes, it will. If it doesn't, then your filesystem is probably mounted
> noatime. Mutt uses the filesystem's atime to determine whether mbox files
> contain new mail.
Uh, since mutt's main display never updated when I was on that screen the
display never updated when n
On 8/28/06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It lacks a decent IMAP implementation. Hint, IMAP is not a glorified POP.
I know, I use mutt with imap and I don't have problems wiht it. What IMAP
features do you miss?
If you pardon my jumping in, gentlemen, I would say that Mu
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
> I use Sylpheed. Not a gem, but suitable, especially with full
> keyboard control. I could live with TB, too, but I was too annoyed by
> its' inability to copy a sent message to 'Sent' IMAP folder (recent
> messages at mozillazine forums show that the problem still
> persists.
On 8/29/06, Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
> I use Sylpheed. Not a gem, but suitable, especially with full
> keyboard control. I could live with TB, too, but I was too annoyed by
> its' inability to copy a sent message to 'Sent' IMAP folder (recent
> messages at mozill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
> CJ van den Berg wrote:
>> Yes, it will. If it doesn't, then your filesystem is probably mounted
>> noatime. Mutt uses the filesystem's atime to determine whether mbox files
>> contain new mail.
>
> Uh, since mutt's main displa
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
> If I don't trust my own eyes, what else do I have to believe? :) I
> experienced this problem and this experience was the reason to drop
> (reluctantly, though) Firefox. And I see
> (http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=2451257) that other
> people have this problem,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
> On 8/28/06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> keyboard control. I could live with TB, too, but I was too
> annoyed by its' inability to copy a sent message to 'Sent' IMAP
> folder (recent messages at mozi
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 06:51:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Steve Lamb wrote:
> > CJ van den Berg wrote:
> >> Yes, it will. If it doesn't, then your filesystem is probably mounted
> >> noatime. Mutt uses the filesystem's atime to determine whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dmitri Minaev wrote:
> On 8/29/06, Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dmitri Minaev wrote:
>> > I use Sylpheed. Not a gem, but suitable, especially with full
>> > keyboard control. I could live with TB, too, but I was too annoyed by
>> > its' ina
I did not know Mulberry was still around. I thought it was no longer under
development. I was a Sylpheed Claws user until I began using IMAP, then it
no longer worked for me, but fortunately kmail has developed into a nice
mailer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
CJ van den Berg wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 06:51:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Steve Lamb wrote:
>>> CJ van den Berg wrote:
Yes, it will. If it doesn't, then your filesystem is proba
On 8/29/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Really? I've been doing that ever since I started using Tbird.
Here's a window shot of how I configured Edit->"Account Settings":
That's exactly what I used to do :( I'll try and switch to 'Other',
as Steve has advised. Hope, that'll help.
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
