On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:59:29 -0600
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Debian-multimedia now has a native 64 bit flashplayer in Experimental. I
> haven't tried it yet so I don't know how well it works.
I tried that one and it didn't work initially with nspluginwrapter installed. I
downloade
On 11/22/08 07:59, John Hasler wrote:
Debian-multimedia now has a native 64 bit flashplayer in Experimental. I
haven't tried it yet so I don't know how well it works.
All should remember that the 64-bit player is still Beta, so it will
be flakier than the 32-bit player.
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Debian-multimedia now has a native 64 bit flashplayer in Experimental. I
haven't tried it yet so I don't know how well it works.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 05:50:25PM +0530, Girish Kulkarni wrote:
>> Has anyone had any success in using the new 64-bit Adobe Flash player
>> for Linux on Debian? --
>
> Yes. Here with amd64 system.
>
>> http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/fla
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 05:50:25PM +0530, Girish Kulkarni wrote:
> Has anyone had any success in using the new 64-bit Adobe Flash player
> for Linux on Debian? --
Yes. Here with amd64 system.
> http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/
Do not stress yourself :-)
Jus
Has anyone had any success in using the new 64-bit Adobe Flash player
for Linux on Debian? --
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/
I tried installing it on my x86_64 Etch machine but Iceweasel doesn't
seem to detect it. I followed the instructions gives on the player's
dow
On Sun, 2008-07-27 at 10:01 -0400, Jonathan Jacobs wrote:
> I still consider myself a newbe. I have looked in Synaptic package
> manager and I have orange liborange0 when I do a search for flash
> player. I see swf-player, but that says that is a plugin for mozilla
> and I am using
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:01:19 -0400
Jonathan Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Jonathan,
> I still consider myself a newbe. I have looked in Synaptic package
> manager and I have orange liborange0 when I do a search for flash
> player. I see swf-player, but that says that
Jonathan Jacobs wrote:
> I still consider myself a newbe. I have looked in Synaptic package
> manager and I have orange liborange0 when I do a search for flash
> player. I see swf-player, but that says that is a plugin for mozilla
> and I am using Epiphany as my web-browser. I hav
I still consider myself a newbe. I have looked in Synaptic package
manager and I have orange liborange0 when I do a search for flash
player. I see swf-player, but that says that is a plugin for mozilla
and I am using Epiphany as my web-browser. I have downloaded
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 20:29 -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Kelly Clowers wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >>> Ha
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Nick Lidakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kelly Clowers wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 07/20/08 14:01, Kelly Clowers wrote:
>>> [snip]
Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/20/08 14:01, Kelly Clowers wrote:
[snip]
Personally, I prefer Adobe's Flash 10 beta. It seems to have smoother
playback and some report lower cpu us
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/20/08 14:01, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> Personally, I prefer Adobe's Flash 10 beta. It seems to have smoother
>> playback and some report lower cpu usage.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/20/08 14:01, Kelly Clowers wrote:
[snip]
>
> Personally, I prefer Adobe's Flash 10 beta. It seems to have smoother
> playback and some report lower cpu usage.
How stable is it?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
"Kittens give Morbo gas.
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:01:17PM -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Andrew Sackville-West
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > well, you still aren't running the debian version, but instead running
> > the adobe installed version. There's nothing inherently wrong with
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Andrew Sackville-West
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> well, you still aren't running the debian version, but instead running
> the adobe installed version. There's nothing inherently wrong with
> that except that your package manager doesn't have control of the
> si
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:30:31AM +0100, andy wrote:
> andy wrote:
>> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>>> andy wrote:
>>>> Greetings
>>>>
>>>> The following is one of a number of sites (including, for example,
>>>> parts of the NA
andy wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
andy wrote:
Greetings
The following is one of a number of sites (including, for example,
parts of the NASA site) where I am told that my version of Flash
Player is outdated: "You need the latest Flash Player plugin to view
the multimedia content of
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
andy wrote:
Greetings
The following is one of a number of sites (including, for example,
parts of the NASA site) where I am told that my version of Flash
Player is outdated: "You need the latest Flash Player plugin to view
the multimedia content of this site.&
I've noticed with both Iceweasel 2 and 3 that sometimes i "lose"
flash. I have flashplayer-nonfree and the only solution i found so far
is to close all Iceweasel instances and run "dpkg-reconfigure
iceweasel".
--
Nuno Magalhães
andy wrote:
Greetings
The following is one of a number of sites (including, for example, parts
of the NASA site) where I am told that my version of Flash Player is
outdated: "You need the latest Flash Player plugin to view the
multimedia content of this site.&
(including, for example,
> >> parts of the NASA site) where I am told that my version of Flash
> >> Player is outdated: "You need the latest Flash Player plugin to
> >> view the multimedia content of this site."
> >
> >> http://science.natio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/19/08 14:11, andy wrote:
> Greetings
>
> The following is one of a number of sites (including, for example, parts
> of the NASA site) where I am told that my version of Flash Player is
> outdated: "You need the latest Fl
2008/7/19 Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 08:11:47PM +0100, andy wrote:
>> Greetings
>>
>> The following is one of a number of sites (including, for example, parts
>> of the NASA site) where I am told that my version of Flash
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 08:11:47PM +0100, andy wrote:
> Greetings
>
> The following is one of a number of sites (including, for example, parts
> of the NASA site) where I am told that my version of Flash Player is
> outdated: "You need the latest Flash Player plugin to vie
Greetings
The following is one of a number of sites (including, for example, parts
of the NASA site) where I am told that my version of Flash Player is
outdated: "You need the latest Flash Player plugin to view the
multimedia content of this site."
http://science.nationalgeog
ch but again no chance here.
Then I clean all mu plugins folders and upgrade with definitely the last
Flash Player 9 (9,0,115,0).
I'm using Xfce 4 Desktop Environment version 4.4.2 (Xfce 4.4) and
maintain all free Debian packages on a daily basis.
Running in -safe-mode didn't really help
Hi time lord,
On 7/17/07, time lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, I have debian etch installed since yesterday (16-July-07).
I have used both synaptic and apt-get to install Bart Martens installer
package off of DVD1,
this process then fetches the flash player from adobe and the i
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:15:12PM +0100, time lord wrote:
> this process then fetches the flash player from adobe and the install
> continues but it
> fails at the end with: "Not Installed, md5 fail" - from memory and indeed
> when I try a vid on
> you tube it compl
Hello, I have debian etch installed since yesterday (16-July-07).
I have used both synaptic and apt-get to install Bart Martens installer
package off of DVD1,
this process then fetches the flash player from adobe and the install
continues but it
fails at the end with: "Not Installed, md5
Andrea Giuliano wrote:
Hi, I've been using some flash movies with flash player 7 with no
problems, but when I installed flash player 9 I completely lost audio.
This happened both with forefox and epiphany, I just have these two
browser.
Any hint?
Best regards.
I use firefox 1.5
On 5/19/07, Andrea Giuliano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I've been using some flash movies with flash player 7 with no
problems, but when I installed flash player 9 I completely lost audio.
This happened both with forefox and epiphany, I just have these two
browser.
Any hint?
Hi, I've been using some flash movies with flash player 7 with no
problems, but when I installed flash player 9 I completely lost audio.
This happened both with forefox and epiphany, I just have these two browser.
Any hint?
Best regards.
--
Andrea
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
On 17 Jan 2007, Kent West wrote:
> Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Flash Player 9 for Linux came out of beta yesterday. I had a little hiccup
> > installing it on my Etch box, so I thought I'd share my solution to spare
> > you the hiccup. I
Hello Lists,
is there a 86_64 version ?
Jerome
Kent West wrote:
Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
Hi all,
Flash Player 9 for Linux came out of beta yesterday. I had a little hiccup
installing it on my Etch box, so I thought I'd share my solution to spare
you the hiccup. I use Firefox version 1.5
Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Flash Player 9 for Linux came out of beta yesterday. I had a little hiccup
> installing it on my Etch box, so I thought I'd share my solution to spare
> you the hiccup. I use Firefox version 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.7-2.
>
> The installer
Hi all,
Flash Player 9 for Linux came out of beta yesterday. I had a little hiccup
installing it on my Etch box, so I thought I'd share my solution to spare
you the hiccup. I use Firefox version 1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.7-2.
The installer will ask "Please enter the installation path..."
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 07:49:42PM -0800, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> >You could always install it directly from adobe.com.
> >
> >
> Is it there, now? It certainly wasn't there a few days ago.
Yes, it's at http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer9.html
signature.asc
Descr
sites like nickjr.com and
> >>>noggin.com. Both of these worked until recently, but now I am having
> >>>problems with them, and my daughter (almost 6 years old) really likes
> >>>the games.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
Etch would not make the
December release, and were not referring to Flash Player 9.
I did refer to FP9, I only mentioned FP8 because I have never seen a
site telling my I need FP9, but there are a couple that reject browsers
with at least FP8.
But what I actually wanted to say: FP is clo
>>
> Ooops! I missed that you were suggesting that Etch would not make the
> December release, and were not referring to Flash Player 9.
I did refer to FP9, I only mentioned FP8 because I have never seen a
site telling my I need FP9, but there are a couple that reject browsers
with a
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/31/06 17:50, Marc Shapiro wrote:
Jochen Schulz wrote:
Marc Shapiro:
[snip]
But, once it does get into Sid, or whatever testing will be, then
it is almost certain to get backported so that those of us th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/31/06 17:50, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Jochen Schulz wrote:
>> Marc Shapiro:
[snip]
> But, once it does get into Sid, or whatever testing will be, then
> it is almost certain to get backported so that those of us that
> prefer a 'stable' machine can
e the
December release, and were not referring to Flash Player 9. Well, if
Etch takes a little longer then that leaves more4 time for Flash Player
9 to make it in. And if not, then there is always backports.
--
Marc Shapiro
No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorro
Jochen Schulz wrote:
Marc Shapiro:
What is the likelihood that this will actually make it into Etch before
the December release?
What is the likelyhood of etch being released in December? :->
Seriously, I hate to say it, but http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
doesn't look very
Marc Shapiro:
>
> What is the likelihood that this will actually make it into Etch before
> the December release?
What is the likelyhood of etch being released in December? :->
Seriously, I hate to say it, but http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/
doesn't look very convincing that the schedu
Jochen Schulz wrote:
Bart Martens:
Users of Debian "testing" are invited try flashplugin-nonfree version
9.0.21.55.1 from "experimental". This version installs Flash Player 9
beta [1].
On unstable this appears to work fine. I installed the package from
experimen
Bart Martens:
>
> Users of Debian "testing" are invited try flashplugin-nonfree version
> 9.0.21.55.1 from "experimental". This version installs Flash Player 9
> beta [1].
On unstable this appears to work fine. I installed the package from
experimental, searche
What is the difference between flashplayer-mozilla (debian-multimedia)
and flashplugin-nonfree ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Users of Debian "testing" are invited try flashplugin-nonfree version
9.0.21.55.1 from "experimental". This version installs Flash Player 9
beta [1]. Also a few bugs [2] were fixed. If you're happy with how bug
387263 [3] was fixed, then please report that on th
On 5/16/06, Edward J. Shornock wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:49:13PM +0200, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> I'm sorry, maybe is normal; just for comparisons with systems that works
> fine :)
If you've not solved this problem yet, check out bug#363378. The
solutions posted there worked for me.
On Sat, 20 May 2006 13:17:42 -0700
Raquel Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to install Flash Player for Mozilla and Firefox.
> Searching the archives is useless. How might I proceed?
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> --
> Raquel
Thank you, everyone, for
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 01:17:42PM -0700, Raquel Rice wrote:
> I would like to install Flash Player for Mozilla and Firefox.
> Searching the archives is useless. How might I proceed?
Partial results of "apt-cache search flash" include:
swf-player - Mozilla plugin for SWF f
I would like to install Flash Player for Mozilla and Firefox.
Searching the archives is useless. How might I proceed?
Thanks for your help!
--
Raquel
We are so accustomed to disguise ourselves to others that in the end
we become
On 05/20/2006 04:40 PM, Raquel Rice wrote:
> I would like to install Flash Player for Mozilla and Firefox.
> Searching the archives is useless. How might I proceed?
>
> Thanks for your help!
Raquel,
The non-free and free players Conflict; choose one.
I'm using flashpl
On Sat, 20 May 2006 16:33:03 -0400
Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 01:17:42PM -0700, Raquel Rice wrote:
> > I would like to install Flash Player for Mozilla and Firefox.
> > Searching the archives is useless. How might I proceed?
>
> Pa
Raquel Rice wrote:
I would like to install Flash Player for Mozilla and Firefox.
Searching the archives is useless. How might I proceed?
Thanks for your help!
There is an (unofficial) package named flashplayer-mozilla
You can download it (with any needed dependencies) with the following
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 04:49:13PM +0200, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> I'm sorry, maybe is normal; just for comparisons with systems that works
> fine :)
If you've not solved this problem yet, check out bug#363378. The
solutions posted there worked for me.
signature.asc
Description: Digital si
A Dijous 11 Maig 2006 15:50, Chris Brotherton va escriure:
> I had to install the following packages to get text to work in flash:
>
> gsfonts
> gsfonts-x11
> gsfont-other
I've these packages:
ii gsfonts8.14+v8.11+urw-0.2
ii gsfonts-other 6.0-3
ii gsfonts-x110.19
:?
One detail t
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 03:27:52PM +0200, Benjamí Villoslada wrote:
> A Dimecres 10 Maig 2006 23:24, vàreu escriure:
> > Figured it out. For some reason my font directories where missing
> > some fonts.dir files. As shown in my X log
> >
> > I had to run
> > mkfontdir /usr/share/fonts/truetype/op
A Dimecres 10 Maig 2006 23:24, vàreu escriure:
> Figured it out. For some reason my font directories where missing
> some fonts.dir files. As shown in my X log
>
> I had to run
> mkfontdir /usr/share/fonts/truetype/openoffice
>
> for every font directory that didn't have a fonts.dir file.
Thanks
Figured it out. For some reason my font directories where missing
some fonts.dir files. As shown in my X log
I had to run
mkfontdir /usr/share/fonts/truetype/openoffice
for every font directory that didn't have a fonts.dir file.
On 5/10/06, Anthony Tippett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not wor
Not working for I either... Anyone yet found the problem?
I'm also using xorg 7.0
--
Anthony Tippett - 425 443 3152
* Benjam? Villoslada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060501 11:33]:
>
> Fonts dosen't works again in Flash :( Maybe due the last x-org updates.
>
> Anyone have solved this issue?
I'm having the same problem.
--
Lance Simmons
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
;t test flash since the xorg update, but I used to have
> > it and needed 'gsfonts-x11' in order to see fonts. Maybe that's old
> > advice though.
>
> I've gsfonts-x11 0.18 installed, and not fonts in Flash Player. Thanks!
I'm sorry: today gsfonts-x1
ut I used to have
> > it and needed 'gsfonts-x11' in order to see fonts. Maybe that's old
> > advice though.
>
> I've gsfonts-x11 0.18 installed, and not fonts in Flash Player. Thanks!
I'm sorry: today gasfonts-x11 update 0.18 to 0.19 solves the Flash issue :)
--
Benjamí
http://blog.bitassa.cat
.
onts. Maybe that's old
> advice though.
I've gsfonts-x11 0.18 installed, and not fonts in Flash Player. Thanks!
--
Benjamí
http://blog.bitassa.cat
.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 07:52:08AM +0200, Benjam? Villoslada wrote:
> Today I've seen that Flickr Organizr page doesn't show fonts. Seems that is
> since the last xorg 7 update; only few days ago I can use Organizr.
>
> This workaround doesn't works:
> http://macromedia.mplug.org/faq.html > #11
Today I've seen that Flickr Organizr page doesn't show fonts. Seems that is
since the last xorg 7 update; only few days ago I can use Organizr.
This workaround doesn't works:
http://macromedia.mplug.org/faq.html > #11
Maybe the solution is to adapt this thread to Sid:
https://bugzilla.redhat.
Hey all,
I'm looking for a good solution to load tunes into my new iAudio G3.
The device mounts like any USB based storage device and I can copy
files into it with no trouble, but I would like to find a GUI program
that will let me make a playlist and then dump the files all at once in
the proper
Hello.
I'm trying to capture sound from a website. Sound comes from flash player,
so I can't use mplayer.
It seems the only solution is to capture the sound from the sound card,
but after much googling and experimenting for hours, I can't do it.
Would anyone please help
Deboo Geek wrote:
> How well are these devices supported and which ones are supported?
> Where can I get the list? Is there PNP support for these devices in
> debian?
If the player supports UMS (USB Mass Storage) it's very well
supported. I simply plug it in and an icon pops up on my GNOME desktop
On 5/8/05, Deboo Geek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How well are these devices supported and which ones are supported?
Which devices? Hiding the question away in the subject isn't the best of ideas.
The majority of hardware mp3 players are bog standages USB Mass
Storage devices, which have been we
How well are these devices supported and which ones are supported?
Where can I get the list? Is there PNP support for these devices in
debian?
Deboo
--
Please don't Cc: me, I'm subscribed to the list.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 05:17:05PM +0100, Willem-Jan Meijer wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> Is there a flash-player for konqueror? If it is, where can I find it?
As everyone else mentioned, it's the same as the Netscape plugin. A
very useful apt source for this is Christian Mari
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 02:12:37PM -0700, Cameron Matheson wrote:
> Konqi just uses netscape plugins... I know that in KDE 3.1 there is
> an option to tell konqi what paths to search for plugins, but i
> don't know about versions before that.
It's in the same place in 2x.
--
.''`. Baloo <[E
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 05:17:05PM +0100, Willem-Jan Meijer wrote:
> Is there a flash-player for konqueror? If it is, where can I find it?
It's the same as is for mozilla. Netscape, Mozilla and Konq use the
same plugins.
--
.''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :'
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 17:17:05 +0100,
Willem-Jan Meijer wrote:
>
> Good afternoon,
>
> Is there a flash-player for konqueror? If it is, where can I
> find it?
Good morning,
konqueror can use the crash-player for Mozilla. In my experience
it's even a bit more robust a
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 17:17:05 +0100
Willem-Jan Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a flash-player for konqueror? If it is, where can I find
> it?
Hi!
Take a look at
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/flashplugin-nonfree.html
If you don't run unstable, you can dro
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 17:17:05 +0100
Willem-Jan Meijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a flash-player for konqueror? If it is, where can I find
> it?
Hi!
Take a look at
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/flashplugin-nonfree.html
If you don't run unstable, you can dro
Hi,
On Thursday 23 January 2003 09:17 am, Willem-Jan Meijer wrote:
> Is there a flash-player for konqueror? If it is, where can I find it?
Konqi just uses netscape plugins... I know that in KDE 3.1 there is an option
to tell konqi what paths to search for plugins, but i don't kn
Good afternoon,
Is there a flash-player for konqueror? If it is, where can I find it?
HTH,
Willem-Jan Meijer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 17:45:12 +0100
Oliver Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> I use opera and mozilla on my box with macromedia flash player plugin in versions
>5.x and 6.x for a while. No problems so far. Since I installed sound system alsa. It
>is installed from a
Hi
I use opera and mozilla on my box with macromedia flash player plugin in versions 5.x
and 6.x for a while. No problems so far. Since I installed sound system alsa. It is
installed from alsa sources in the actual release 0.9.0rc6 and works very well
starting xmms or alsamixer for example
Shawn Lamson wrote:
I can view presentations and play games in macromedia flash player
using mozilla 1.something... but it is about 1/3 the speed that it
should be. Has anyone else experienced this? I can view/play them
fine in win2k, so it isnt a processor/connection issue ( i think )
unless
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 02:49:44PM -0800, Shawn Lamson wrote:
> I can view presentations and play games in macromedia flash player
> using mozilla 1.something... but it is about 1/3 the speed that it
> should be. Has anyone else experienced this? I can view/play them
> fine in win2k
I can view presentations and play games in macromedia flash player
using mozilla 1.something... but it is about 1/3 the speed that it
should be. Has anyone else experienced this? I can view/play them
fine in win2k, so it isnt a processor/connection issue ( i think )
unless linux doesnt handling
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 05:16:05PM +0300, ? ? wrote:
> > debian-user (d) writes:
>
> d> I've downloaded, compiled and installed npflash.so on Mozilla/5.0
> d> (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020214 as
> d> suggested. Still no luck, movie only displays as placholde
> debian-user (d) writes:
d> I've downloaded, compiled and installed npflash.so on Mozilla/5.0
d> (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020214 as
d> suggested. Still no luck, movie only displays as placholder icon and
d> asks for redirect to download Macromedia player.
d> About:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 02:16:31PM +0100, Wayne Sitton wrote:
> Netscape 6.2.1 runs on the mozilla code, so The flash problem is
> inherant in both. Install Netscape 4.77 from apt-get. It works with
> flash. at least that is what I did.
Are you using woody? The reason I upgraded to 6.2.1 was be
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 07:51:56AM +0530, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
> debian-user posts :
>
> > the Flash player stopped working. I've done trouble shooting, including
>
> This may not solve your problem though, do have a look at a GPLed Flash
> player/plug-in.
I&#
ote:
> > On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >the Flash player to stop working. I've done trouble shooting, including
> > >installing the lastest verion of Netscape 6.2.1.
> >
> > Try getting it straight from the vendor. When I used t
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 12:36:30PM +1300, Cameron Kerr wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >the Flash player to stop working. I've done trouble shooting, including
> >installing the lastest verion of Netscape 6.2.1.
>
> Try getting it straight
debian-user posts :
> the Flash player to stop working. I've done trouble shooting, including
> installing the latest version of Netscape 6.2.1.
This may not solve your problem though, do have a look at a GPLed Flash
player/plug-in.
http://www.swift-tools.com/
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
>I using the latest version of woody and recent upgrade seems to have caused
>the Flash player to stop working. I've done trouble shoting, including
>installing the lastest verion of Netscape 6.2.1.
Try getting it straight from t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Java seems to be installed.
>
>
I don't think you even need that .class file for the plugin to
work. Anyhow, a simple search in bugzilla turns up quite a few bugs
about java and flash plugins not working when both are installed (I had
it happen at some point last y
> > the Flash player stopped working. I've done trouble shooting, including
> Well, a better description of what your browser's doing and/or not doing
> might help here. Just saying "Flash doesn't work" makes it kind of hard
Er, Netscape 4.72 was doing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
> I using the latest version of woody and recent upgrade seems to have caused
> the Flash player to stop working. I've done trouble shoting, including
> installing the lastest verion of Netscape 6.2.1.
>
> bash-2.05a$ ls -al /usr
Java seems to be installed.
bash-2.05a$ ls -al /usr/local/netscape/plugins/
total 964
drwxr-sr-x3 jp staff4096 Mar 1 10:13 .
drwxr-sr-x9 jp staff4096 Mar 1 10:35 ..
-rw-r--r--1 jp staff2363 Nov 26 18:28
ShockwaveFlash.class
drwxr-sr-x6 j
301 - 400 of 411 matches
Mail list logo
