On 31/03/20 7:32 am, David Wright wrote:
> Richard Hector was unable to save the empty Romanian attachment, so
> I posted a non-empty version to see whether it was the emptiness or
> the name that was the problem. No reply.
Apologies; that (or at least the intent of it) slipped past me. I can
save
On 2020-03-30 at 14:32, David Wright wrote:
> On Sat 28 Mar 2020 at 10:30:07 (+0200), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
>> On Vi, 27 mar 20, 23:15:12, David Wright wrote:
>>
>>> However, the actual problem that Russell introduced was how a
>>> character set—any character set—should be encoded in the emai
On Mon 30 Mar 2020 at 07:26:06 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:15:12PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > (BTW I'm not sure about Reco's use of \uc899. Does \u mean that
> > c899 is in utf-8, or should it be followed by a Unicode codepoint,
> > as in U+c899? If the latter, th
On Sat 28 Mar 2020 at 10:30:07 (+0200), Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 27 mar 20, 23:15:12, David Wright wrote:
> >
> > However, the actual problem that Russell introduced was how a
> > character set—any character set—should be encoded in the email header
> > parameter's value. And the RFC answer
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:15:12PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> (BTW I'm not sure about Reco's use of \uc899. Does \u mean that
> c899 is in utf-8, or should it be followed by a Unicode codepoint,
> as in U+c899? If the latter, then \uc899 is way off my charts.)
It's a notation used in some progra
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 02:37:22PM -, Curt wrote:
[...]
> Not at all; I'm an expatriate who's lost some of his Anglophonic
> reflexes after many years here in France. What's gone in one ear has
> pushed some stuff out the other.
That's why we often have two of them, after all ;-)
Cheers
--
On 2020-03-28, wrote:
>
>
>> > This betrays a little your French background :-)
>> Yes, you're right, that's it.
> Lest it be interpreted the wrong way: I'll venture to describe
> my relation to France and its culture as a kind of love afair.
Not at all; I'm an expatriate who's lost some of hi
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 01:15:25PM +, Joe wrote:
> [...] despite being taught Spanish by a bearded Australian
> who looked a lot like Roger Whittaker
Sounds about right (note that I'm Spanish myself, although
I'd rather say Cosmopolitan or something ;-)
Cheers
-- t
signature.asc
Description
On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:03:54 +0100
wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 09:38:09AM -, Curt wrote:
> > On 2020-03-28, wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > This betrays a little your French background :-)
> >
> > Yes, you're right, that's it.
>
> Lest it be interpreted the wrong way: I'll venture t
On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 09:44:20 - (UTC)
Curt wrote:
> On 2020-03-28, Joe wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Reco meant Roumanian (a Latin language). Or does everybody
> >> >> already know that?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Yes, Romanian or Rumanian is Latin, but here in the context
> >> > Latin is ambiguo
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 09:38:09AM -, Curt wrote:
> On 2020-03-28, wrote:
[...]
> > This betrays a little your French background :-)
>
> Yes, you're right, that's it.
Lest it be interpreted the wrong way: I'll venture to describe
my relation to France and its culture as a kind of love afa
On 2020-03-28, Joe wrote:
>> >
>> >> Reco meant Roumanian (a Latin language). Or does everybody
>> >> already know that?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Yes, Romanian or Rumanian is Latin, but here in the context Latin is
>> > ambiguous.
>> >
>>
>> My confusion stemmed from the fact I thought the correct
On 2020-03-28, wrote:
>
>> My confusion stemmed from the fact I thought the correct word was
>> "Roumanian," not Romanian, which I took for a typo, exposing my
> ^^
>> ignorance (which paradoxically seems to be increasing the more I know
>> (because the more I know the more I realize I don't)
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 09:08:23AM -, Curt wrote:
> On 2020-03-27, deloptes wrote:
> > Curt wrote:
> >
> >> Reco meant Roumanian (a Latin language). Or does everybody
> >> already know that?
> >>
> >
> > Yes, Romanian or Rumanian is Latin, but here in the context Latin is
> > ambiguous.
> >
On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 09:08:23 - (UTC)
Curt wrote:
> On 2020-03-27, deloptes wrote:
> > Curt wrote:
> >
> >> Reco meant Roumanian (a Latin language). Or does everybody
> >> already know that?
> >>
> >
> > Yes, Romanian or Rumanian is Latin, but here in the context Latin is
> > ambiguous.
On 2020-03-27, deloptes wrote:
> Curt wrote:
>
>> Reco meant Roumanian (a Latin language). Or does everybody
>> already know that?
>>
>
> Yes, Romanian or Rumanian is Latin, but here in the context Latin is
> ambiguous.
>
My confusion stemmed from the fact I thought the correct word was
"Rouman
On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 09:41:01 +0100
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:15:12PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
>
> > [Romans] They spoke Vulgar Latin, and that outlived the
> > Empire, evolving and dividing into the Romance languages.
> >
> > But it's strange how an aside can kill the actual discuss
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:15:12PM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> [Romans] They spoke Vulgar Latin, and that outlived the
> Empire, evolving and dividing into the Romance languages.
>
> But it's strange how an aside can kill the actual discussion of
> email headers.
:-)
Yet in some way the topics
On Vi, 27 mar 20, 23:15:12, David Wright wrote:
>
> However, the actual problem that Russell introduced was how a
> character set—any character set—should be encoded in the email header
> parameter's value. And the RFC answer is "not in Base64", which is for
> unstructured fields, as illustrated b
On Fri 27 Mar 2020 at 12:42:17 (-0400), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:12:49AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 27 Mar 2020 at 17:35:19 (+0300), Reco wrote:
> > > I'm not that familiar with the languages to qualify Romanian as a Latin
> > > or a non-Latin language,
> >
> >
Curt wrote:
> Reco meant Roumanian (a Latin language). Or does everybody
> already know that?
>
Yes, Romanian or Rumanian is Latin, but here in the context Latin is
ambiguous.
Romanian is Latin, because it belongs to the Latin family of languages like
Italian. (well both of them descend from t
On Fri 27 Mar 2020 at 12:42:17 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:12:49AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 27 Mar 2020 at 17:35:19 (+0300), Reco wrote:
> > > I'm not that familiar with the languages to qualify Romanian as a Latin
> > > or a non-Latin language,
> >
> > I
On 2020-03-27, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:12:49AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
>> On Fri 27 Mar 2020 at 17:35:19 (+0300), Reco wrote:
>> > I'm not that familiar with the languages to qualify Romanian as a Latin
>> > or a non-Latin language,
>>
>> I think we can agree that the
On Vi, 27 mar 20, 12:42:17, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:12:49AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> > On Fri 27 Mar 2020 at 17:35:19 (+0300), Reco wrote:
> > > I'm not that familiar with the languages to qualify Romanian as a Latin
> > > or a non-Latin language,
> >
> > I think we c
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:12:49AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 27 Mar 2020 at 17:35:19 (+0300), Reco wrote:
> > I'm not that familiar with the languages to qualify Romanian as a Latin
> > or a non-Latin language,
>
> I think we can agree that the Romans spoke Latin!
Err... Romanian is not
On Fri 27 Mar 2020 at 17:35:19 (+0300), Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 02:22:18PM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > or an attachment was named using non-Latin characters.
> >
> > Is that non-Latin or non-ASCII?
>
> I'm not that familiar with the languages to qualify Romania
26 matches
Mail list logo
