Re: Upgrading from Hamm to Potato

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I want to upgrade my system from Hamm (2.0) to Potato (2.2), using CDROMs. I > tried to first install apt, but, not surprisingly, I got all kinds of > dependency errors. http://panic.et.tudelft.nl/~costar/potato/upgrade-i386/ cu -- hafi

Upgrading from Hamm to Potato

I want to upgrade my system from Hamm (2.0) to Potato (2.2), using CDROMs. I tried to first install apt, but, not surprisingly, I got all kinds of dependency errors. So I thought I would do it the old fashioned way one more time: using dselect and do each of the binary CDs separately (Update

Hamm to slink to XFree86 3.3.5

Here is my problem:  My end goal is to install StarOffice 51.  I loaded hamm from my cd, upgraded to slink using apt-get from ftp.debian.org, then pulled down XFree86 3.3.5 (current) for glibc.  When I run startx I get this: /usr/X11R6/bin/X: error in loading shared libraries : undefined

Re: Updating hamm to slink

On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 08:31, Wacek Gocki wrote: > I want to update my server running with hamm to slink ... > What's the safest way to do this ? > I'd prefer not to use dselect, just update necessary > libraries and installed software. I've got a fairly sketchy b

Re: Updating hamm to slink -- EOT

> Take a look at: > ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/stable/main/Release-Notes No more questions, that's all what I wanted to know Thanks for all answers ... Merry Christmas and Happy Y2K :-) Wacek // Wacek Gocki // e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.lhotse.com.pl

Re: Updating hamm to slink

, Wacek Gocki wrote: > Hi > > I want to update my server running with hamm to slink ... > What's the safest way to do this ? > I'd prefer not to use dselect, just update necessary > libraries and installed software. > > Wacek > > // Wacek Gocki > // e

Re: Updating hamm to slink

On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 08:31:25AM +0100, Wacek Gocki wrote: > Hi > > I want to update my server running with hamm to slink ... > What's the safest way to do this ? > I'd prefer not to use dselect, just update necessary > libraries and installed software. > dow

Updating hamm to slink

Hi I want to update my server running with hamm to slink ... What's the safest way to do this ? I'd prefer not to use dselect, just update necessary libraries and installed software. Wacek // Wacek Gocki // e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.lhotse.com.pl

Help with Hamm to whatever????

I've installed Hamm from a cd.  I need to upgrade X to 3.3.5 so it will support my i740 video card.  It would be nice to install StarOffice51, but that won't happen cause it needs glibc.  How can I get to where I need to be?

lpd problem after hamm->potato upgrade

Hello! After finally upgrading to hamm->potato, one small problem remains unsolved (the rest I managed to kill :). While printing works fine when I do 'cat > /dev/', lpd seems to think the printer is offline (lpc claims the daemon is waiting for the printer). What could be the

Re: hamm->potato with apt?

I did this so I don't know if any new problems have cropped up, but that is how I installed Debian on this machine, as I had the Debian 2.0 CD and wanted to be running potato. Sean Peter Schuller wrote: > > Hello! > > Theoretically, if I installed apt on a hamm (2.0) system,

hamm->potato with apt?

Hello! Theoretically, if I installed apt on a hamm (2.0) system, and attempted to have it upgrade to kernel 2.2 and glibc 2.1, would it download all other packages necessary for the system to work afterwords? If yes then; has anyone actually tried this? I'd hate to have to re-install Debia

howto upgrade hamm -> potato

I am using a weird hamm dist with a self compiled kernel (2.0.10), and some other software which wasn't available as packages with the features I needed (postfix, ssh2, perl, apache-ssl ...). How could I upgrade to potato without running in conflicts with dependencies? E. g. there wi

Re: hamm dist sites

Robert Rati wrote: > Are there any ftp sites with the hamm dist still on them? All ther ones > I've found only have slink and potato. Thanks. > >

Upgrading to a 2.2.x kernal and glibc 2.1 on a hamm system

Hello, I am currently considering upgrading my hamm system to kernel 2.2.x and glibc 2.1 (because of IBM's JVM port :). My questions is, has anyone tried this? Which packages can I expect to have to upgrade? What might brake? The kernel is no biggie, I know (since I can just boot the old o

Re: hamm dist sites

*- On 22 Jun, Robert Rati wrote about "hamm dist sites" > Are there any ftp sites with the hamm dist still on them? All ther ones > I've found only have slink and potato. Thanks. > Scroll down to the bottom of http://www.debian.org and you will find: Old versio

Re: hamm dist sites

Robert Rati wrote: > Are there any ftp sites with the hamm dist still on them? All ther ones > I've found only have slink and potato. Thanks. > > Rob > > http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/dists/

hamm dist sites

Are there any ftp sites with the hamm dist still on them? All ther ones I've found only have slink and potato. Thanks. Rob === [EMAIL PROTECTED] : Role-P

Re: Upgrading my bo/hamm system

27;t want to upgrade by hand... > > Thanks. > > Emmanuel, France. If you are upgrading a hybrid system (i.e. bo/hamm) you will need to edit the file /etc/apt/sources.list to the locations that you want. I will attach a copy of mine to a

Re: Upgrading a bo/hamm system

On Sat, Jun 12, 1999 at 09:58:34PM +0200, manu wrote: > Did i make a mistake ? > > APT simply don't do anything useful. > I wanted it to upgrade my entire system, but only 3 pakages were > updated. > > yes, i ve read the release-info. > > Can anyone tell me the secret ? > Cause i really don't wa

Upgrading a bo/hamm system

Did i make a mistake ? APT simply don't do anything useful. I wanted it to upgrade my entire system, but only 3 pakages were updated. yes, i ve read the release-info. Can anyone tell me the secret ? Cause i really don't want to upgrade by hand... Thanks. Emmanuel, France.

Upgrading my bo/hamm system

Did i make a mistake ? APT simply don't do anything useful. I wanted it to upgrade my entire system, but only 3 pakages were updated. yes, i ve read the release-info. Can anyone tell me the secret ? Cause i really don't want to upgrade by hand... Thanks. Emmanuel, France.

Hamm --> Slink: 1. Compose-key lost 2. X11-display problem

Hallo, Last night I "upgraded" my mixed hamm/slink/potato system to a slink-based system. Everything is working satisfactorily now except for the two problems mentioned in the subject line. 1. I cannot get the compose key working again in console mode. When this happened in m

Kernel 2.2 on hamm?

I'd like to run a 2.2.x kernel on my hamm system. Does anyone know what problems will occur when doing this?   Thanks, Stephan Hachinger.

Re: Xsetlocale problem after hamm -> slink

I applied the diff done by Magallo at http://master.debian.org/~mmagallo/packages/wmaker/ and that fixed the locale problems, thanks! Now all I have to do is figure out why netscape dies with a bus error... :( -- Chris Frost | -+

Xsetlocale problem after hamm -> slink

I just upgraded an i386 box from hamm slink (a very rocky upgrade on this box), and when starting Window Maker 0.60 which I compiled under hamm I get an error message with an undefined reference to `_Xsetlocale'. Trying to compile WM 0.60 does the same, giving the following output: Making a

Re: some losses after hamm->slink

Subject: some losses after hamm->slink Date: Sun, May 30, 1999 at 02:26:51PM +0400 In reply to:Eugene Sevinian Quoting Eugene Sevinian([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hi, > after upgrading to slink am unable to work with floppy: > "Operation not supported by device&q

some losses after hamm->slink

Hi, after upgrading to slink am unable to work with floppy: "Operation not supported by device" or something like that. Another problem is that it seems that old way of copying kernel (2.2.5) to another harddisk of floppy by doing dd with previosly set root device by rdev also does not work. Bo

Re: HAMM -> SLINK

On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 04:44:37PM -0400, Matthew McFarlane wrote: > I have HAMM installed. I have the slink distro files. what's the best > way to upgrade (apt?) and how? apt-get dist-upgrade There is an upgrade guide somewhere in the top level directory structure. Bob --

Re: HAMM -> SLINK

yOn Sat, 29 May 1999, Matthew McFarlane wrote: > I have HAMM installed. I have the slink distro files. what's the best > way to upgrade (apt?) and how? The instructions are in the file main/Release-Notes. I think I added apt as a method in dselect, and then let dselect to its thing. ...RickM...

HAMM -> SLINK

I have HAMM installed. I have the slink distro files. what's the best way to upgrade (apt?) and how? Matthew McFarlane -

hamm debs

Where are the hamm .deb's kept nowadays? All I can find are slink and potato and the 'old' bo ones. Is there a way to determine a sources dependancies before trying to compile it up? Specifically I'm referring to mysql and netpbm-nonfree but I'd like a way of finding thi

Installing libc6_2.1.1-7 on hamm

I have a mixed system with a hamm base and slink and potato packages. I want to try out a cd writer (HP 7200i) and to do that want to install a new version of cdrecord as hamm's version does not support the drive. cdrecord depends on libc6 > 2.1. When I try to install libc6 the f

Re: hamm upgrade

Mark Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MT> I'm trying to upgrade a debian 2.0 (hamm) system to 2.1 (slink). MT> I've got 2.1 on a mounted CD-ROM and apt installed correctly on MT> the system. The problem I am having is getting "apt-get MT> dist-upgrade" to

hamm upgrade

I'm trying to upgrade a debian 2.0 (hamm) system to 2.1 (slink). I've got 2.1 on a mounted CD-ROM and apt installed correctly on the system. The problem I am having is getting "apt-get dist-upgrade" to work. When I run the command (as root) I get the following error messag

hamm upgrade

I'm trying to upgrade a debian 2.0 (hamm) system to 2.1 (slink). I've got 2.1 on a mounted CD-ROM and apt installed correctly on the system. The problem I am having is getting "apt-get dist-upgrade" to work. When I run the command (as root) I get the following error messag

Re: Diagnostic message with Netscape 4.51 and Hamm

Jean-Yves BARBIER wrote: > > Todd 'Snoopy' Harper wrote: > > > > G'Day, > > > > I'm currently still running hamm, and I've installed Netscape 4.51 > > using the installer package (4.0-12). When I try to compose a new > > mes

Re: where can I get hamm packages?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jeremy C.Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I am running hamm but I don't have the cd; I do have the slink cds. >Where can I download hamm's apt-get so I can upgrade to slink? The 2 things that the apt from slink depends on that are not

Re: where can I get hamm packages?

On Sat, May 08, 1999 at 12:37:06PM -0800, Jeremy C.Reed wrote: > I am running hamm but I don't have the cd; I do have the slink cds. > > Where can I download hamm's apt-get so I can upgrade to slink? AFAIK it should be on the CD-ROM. In the ftp archive it is in /dists/stab

Re: where can I get hamm packages?

*- On 8 May, Jeremy C.Reed wrote about "where can I get hamm packages?" > I am running hamm but I don't have the cd; I do have the slink cds. > > Where can I download hamm's apt-get so I can upgrade to slink? > ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/slink/m

where can I get hamm packages?

I am running hamm but I don't have the cd; I do have the slink cds. Where can I download hamm's apt-get so I can upgrade to slink? Thanks --Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Diagnostic message with Netscape 4.51 and Hamm

Todd 'Snoopy' Harper wrote: > > G'Day, > > I'm currently still running hamm, and I've installed Netscape 4.51 > using the installer package (4.0-12). When I try to compose a new > message in Messenger, I get a subprocess diagnostic dialog box Hi, I

Diagnostic message with Netscape 4.51 and Hamm

G'Day, I'm currently still running hamm, and I've installed Netscape 4.51 using the installer package (4.0-12). When I try to compose a new message in Messenger, I get a subprocess diagnostic dialog box pop up that says "Warning: Type conversion failed" and repeats it

NFS problem after moving from hamm to slink

Having a problem with root mounted NFS file systems on my PC's acting as X terminals. Everything has been working fine with hamm, but as soon as I upgrade to the nfs-server (and net-base) in slink (either by a full install of slink, or just upgrading the nfs-server), I'm getting al

Re: Upgrading gcc, libc6 and others from hamm to slink

upgrades?) ~> > gcc_2.7.2.3-7.deb ~> > gcc-docs_2.7.2.3-7.deb ~> > glibc-doc_2.0.7.19981211-6.deb ~> > libc6_2.0.7.19981211-6.deb ~> > make_3.77-4.deb ~> > make-doc_3.77-4.deb ~> > ~> upghrading from hamm to slink is a snap: ~> ~> 1.as root open an i

Re: Upgrading gcc, libc6 and others from hamm to slink

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > After much trouble trying to compile a 2.0.35 kernel on a hamm 2.0.34 machine, > I've decided to upgrade some stuff. Will this be enough, or would I need > anything else? Will it cause any trouble in hamm? (touching libc6 scares the > hell o

Upgrading gcc, libc6 and others from hamm to slink

After much trouble trying to compile a 2.0.35 kernel on a hamm 2.0.34 machine, I've decided to upgrade some stuff. Will this be enough, or would I need anything else? Will it cause any trouble in hamm? (touching libc6 scares the hell out of me!) I've downloaded (from Slink): bin86_0.

Re: My (hamm) installation tale (long)

and the binary CD to one of my hard drives and > ran the install from the hard drive. This seems like a terrible solution, > since not everyone is going to have enough free space to be able to do > this. I think multi-CD selection has arrived, but not in hamm, or even slink as released. I would

My (hamm) installation tale (long)

Hello... thought it might be instructive to pass along the things that happened to me when trying to install Linux on my Pentium-133. Some background: I have never installed any brand of Linux before, but I've dabbled in Unix and am somewhat familiar with Linux (some friends have it installed --

Slink update from hamm

I got my cheapbytes debian 2.1 4 cd set and tried to upgrade. I downloaded the latest apt package (0.3.1) from ftp.debian.org and installed it. I ran the apt-cdrom program to set up the /etc/apt/sources.list file. Then I ran apt-get update. (I which I remembered to run the loging script first!)

Re: hamm to slink with upgrade

On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 12:23:56 GMT, you wrote: >I have my cdrom not on /cdrom, but on /mnt/cdrom. /etc/fstab shows >this. However, apt-cdrom tries to mount /cdrom and fails. /etc/apt/apt.conf: Acquire::cdrom::Mount "/mnt/cdrom"; fixes this. Greetings Marc -- -

Re: hamm to slink with upgrade

On Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 11:12:06AM -0500, Sean wrote: > Marc Haber wrote: > > > I have my cdrom not on /cdrom, but on /mnt/cdrom. /etc/fstab shows > > this. However, apt-cdrom tries to mount /cdrom and fails. > > > > Edit your /etc/fstab file so /dev/hdc (or whatever device your cdrom is) is > m

Re: hamm to slink with upgrade

On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 11:12:06 -0500, you wrote: >Marc Haber wrote: >> I have my cdrom not on /cdrom, but on /mnt/cdrom. /etc/fstab shows >> this. However, apt-cdrom tries to mount /cdrom and fails. >> > >Edit your /etc/fstab file so /dev/hdc (or whatever device your cdrom is) is >mounted >on /cdrom

Re: hamm to slink with upgrade

Marc Haber wrote: > I have my cdrom not on /cdrom, but on /mnt/cdrom. /etc/fstab shows > this. However, apt-cdrom tries to mount /cdrom and fails. > Edit your /etc/fstab file so /dev/hdc (or whatever device your cdrom is) is mounted on /cdrom -- change the "/mnt/cdrom" to "/cdrom", then type:

Re: hamm to slink with upgrade

On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 00:48:33 -0700 (MST), you wrote: >then run 'apt-get dist-upgrade -u' twice (or is it 3 times?) I had to run apt-get dis-upgrade -u numerous times (at least twenty times) with varying cd changes to upgrade my hamm test system to slink. Occasionally, even

Re: hamm to slink with upgrade

On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 00:48:33 -0700 (MST), you wrote: >The final solution is to install APT 0.3 from potato and use it's built in >CD handling through apt-cdrom. Good work. I like it. >I have made a special source specifically >for this, > >deb http://www.debian.org/~jgg apt/ > >Which will contain

Re: hamm to slink with upgrade

On Sun, 28 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There have been several posts on debian-user asking how to use apt-get > to upgrade from hamm to slink, now that the binaries no longer fit on > a single CD. > I've seen two answers so far on the list---both of them containi

hamm to slink with upgrade

There have been several posts on debian-user asking how to use apt-get to upgrade from hamm to slink, now that the binaries no longer fit on a single CD. I've seen two answers so far on the list---both of them containing very helpful suggestions, but very different from one another, and

Upgrading from Hamm to Slink

Hello, I'm upgrading from Hamm to Slink, I didn' reboot yet but everything seems OK except for a few minor (?) problems: - I started upgrading with dselect/ftp then I downloaded apt and am actually using it. the problem is that I have a few packages left in "/var/cac

file size limit in emacs20 on hamm

I just tried to edit a 25Mb text file in Emacs20 on a hamm system with 128Mb of RAM. I discovered that the end of the file is shown on the screen (no X, raw ssh/telnet screen) as a structured lot of question marks: ??? ??? ?? and that an

Re: I've been cracked! (hamm, 2.0.35)

On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, buns wrote: > " Raymond A. Ingles" wrote: > > > The address seem to indicate that the intruder originates from Malaysia. > > > > As does yours. > > Rest assured that mine does. BTW, I meant to put a smiley after that "As does yours" part, sorry. > I sincerely think that t

Re: I've been cracked! (hamm, 2.0.35)

" Raymond A. Ingles" wrote: > On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, buns wrote: > > > This is a bit off-topic. > > > > " Raymond A. Ingles" wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Don Erickson wrote: > > > > > > > Somebody (through jhb60.jaring.my) wandered into my system, set up a > > > > user > > > > account for

Re: I've been cracked! (hamm, 2.0.35)

On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, buns wrote: > This is a bit off-topic. > > " Raymond A. Ingles" wrote: > > > On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Don Erickson wrote: > > > > > Somebody (through jhb60.jaring.my) wandered into my system, set up a user > > > account for themselves and set up a couple of programs, eggdrop and

Re: I've been cracked! (hamm, 2.0.35)

This is a bit off-topic. " Raymond A. Ingles" wrote: > On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Don Erickson wrote: > > > Somebody (through jhb60.jaring.my) wandered into my system, set up a user > > account for themselves and set up a couple of programs, eggdrop and smurf. > The address seem to indicate that the i

Re: I've been cracked! (hamm, 2.0.35)

Probably a good idea long-term to subscribe to BUGTRAQ, or at least, debian-security-announce. usually you'll have some leeway between discovery of an exploit and potentially being attacked with it, but if you're wide open for weeks it's definitely asking for trouble. it's also worth shutting dow

Re: I've been cracked! (hamm, 2.0.35)

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > > Then they typically use a "rootkit" to get root access and replace files, >just as you've seen. "ls" is usually the first one they hack. Thanks to all for the good advice, I'm using this as an excellent excuse to upgrade my creaky 486 and start over w

Re: I've been cracked! (hamm, 2.0.35)

On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Raymond A. Ingles wrote: > On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Don Erickson wrote: > > > Somebody (through jhb60.jaring.my) wandered into my system, set up a user > > account for themselves and set up a couple of programs, eggdrop and smurf. Also, upgrade your kernel when you reinstall -

Re: I've been cracked! (hamm, 2.0.35)

On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Don Erickson wrote: > Somebody (through jhb60.jaring.my) wandered into my system, set up a user > account for themselves and set up a couple of programs, eggdrop and smurf. Typically this is done by "script kiddies" who aren't particularly good computer users, but they take

Re: I've been cracked! (hamm, 2.0.35)

In foo.debian-user, you wrote: > Somebody (through jhb60.jaring.my) wandered into my system, set up a user > account for themselves and set up a couple of programs, eggdrop and smurf. > I've not been using encrypted passwords, I understand that there are ways > to derive the "salt" that the passwd

I've been cracked! (hamm, 2.0.35)

Somebody (through jhb60.jaring.my) wandered into my system, set up a user account for themselves and set up a couple of programs, eggdrop and smurf. I've not been using encrypted passwords, I understand that there are ways to derive the "salt" that the passwd file uses? Anyway, this person hid a

Re: Slink and Hamm?

Shawn Nguyen wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry if this is a dumb question but I am new to Debian, what is the > slink > and hamm dist. everyone is talking about. I think that I have the hamm > version because when I installed Debian on my CD it says /hamm/hamm or >

Slink and Hamm?

Hi, Sorry if this is a dumb question but I am new to Debian, what is the slink and hamm dist. everyone is talking about. I think that I have the hamm version because when I installed Debian on my CD it says /hamm/hamm or something like that. Is there some kind of significant

Re: Hamm-->Slink, now fetchmail/exim behaves strangely

Subject: Re: Hamm-->Slink, now fetchmail/exim behaves strangely Date: Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 07:21:36PM +0100 In reply to:Helge Hafting Quoting Helge Hafting([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > you wrote: > > Graham Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >

Re: Hamm-->Slink, now fetchmail/exim behaves strangely

you wrote: > Graham Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tuesday 02 March, Mark Phillips wrote: > > > > > I've just upgraded from Hamm to Slink. Fetchmail seems to work the > > > same as before, except that now, only the first 10

Re: Hamm --> Slink now no color ....

On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 06:00 -0500, Jonathan D. Proulx wrote: > I have recently upgraded to slink and now the following apps only display in > monochrome: > > lynx 2.8.1rel.2 > mutt 0.95.3i > slrn 0.9.5.3 > > I don't get any error mesages and the config files are set to use color. > (minicom is

Hamm --> Slink now no color ....

I have recently upgraded to slink and now the following apps only display in monochrome: lynx 2.8.1rel.2 mutt 0.95.3i slrn 0.9.5.3 I don't get any error mesages and the config files are set to use color. (minicom is still in color)

hamm/slink gotcha

Hello all: Hamm (up to date as of about 3 months ago) update to slink using dselect gives the errors (upon "Install"): internal error - no filename at -e line 12, chunk 14. installation script returned error exit status 1. Press RETURN to continue. Anyone have a clue why I am ge

Re: Hamm-->Slink, now fetchmail/exim behaves strangely

On Tue, 2 Mar 1999, Graham Ashton wrote: > On Tuesday 02 March, Mark Phillips wrote: > > > I've just upgraded from Hamm to Slink. Fetchmail seems to work the > > same as before, except that now, only the first 10 messages get to my > > mail box straight away. &

Re: Hamm-->Slink, now fetchmail/exim behaves strangely

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I suppose it would be possible to change this behaviour, but I haven't > found how; Add this to the "MAIN CONFIGURATION SETTINGS" section of your exim.conf file: # Have exim deliver all mail that's received in a single connection. # Normally it will deliver the first

Re: Hamm-->Slink, now fetchmail/exim behaves strangely

Graham Ashton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tuesday 02 March, Mark Phillips wrote: > > > I've just upgraded from Hamm to Slink. Fetchmail seems to work the > > same as before, except that now, only the first 10 messages get to my > > mail box straight a

Re: Hamm-->Slink, now fetchmail/exim behaves strangely

*- On 2 Mar, Mark Phillips wrote about "Hamm-->Slink, now fetchmail/exim behaves strangely" > > I've just upgraded from Hamm to Slink. Fetchmail seems to work the > same as before, except that now, only the first 10 messages get to my > mail box straight away.

Re: Hamm -> Slink PROBLEMS

On 1 March 1999 at 15:15, Ed Cogburn wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> I am having problems upgrading my new box from hamm to slink. I have instal >led >> apt for hamm. I did changed my /etc/apt/sources.list file to point to >> ftp://ftp.us.debia.org/frozen

Re: Hamm-->Slink, now fetchmail/exim behaves strangely

On Tuesday 02 March, Mark Phillips wrote: > I've just upgraded from Hamm to Slink. Fetchmail seems to work the > same as before, except that now, only the first 10 messages get to my > mail box straight away. I've got the same problem. Strange, isn't it. -- Graham

Hamm-->Slink, now fetchmail/exim behaves strangely

I've just upgraded from Hamm to Slink. Fetchmail seems to work the same as before, except that now, only the first 10 messages get to my mail box straight away. The rest of the messages sit around in the /var/spool/exim/input directory for about 5 minutes before eventually being delivered

Re: upgrading to slink from hamm

Pere Camps wrote: > > Hi! > > What update procedure should I use in order to upgrade to slink > from hamm? Just point dftp to the new ftp directory and upgrade? > > What are the main differences between the two releases (ie: smail > vs exim), that I need

Re: Hamm -> Slink PROBLEMS

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am having problems upgrading my new box from hamm to slink. I have > installed > apt for hamm. I did changed my /etc/apt/sources.list file to point to > ftp://ftp.us.debia.org/frozen main contrib non-free. I then did an > apt-get update foll

Hamm(2.0) vs. Slink(2.1) pages are up

At http://homey.physics.arizona.edu/reports These pages list which packages are new, which are upgraded, etc. These pages may be available at debian.org later. -- John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre

Hamm - X11 Colormap puzzle

-to-date (Hamm-wise and security-wise) distributions. What I have tried: Purge and reinstalled Fvwm-common, Fvwm95, xbase, and all the servers. Tested various changes to XF86Config and also rebuilt. Upgraded to and compiled a new kernel 2.0.36 (Because I wanted to anyway). Cleaned and seated

upgrading to slink from hamm

Hi! What update procedure should I use in order to upgrade to slink from hamm? Just point dftp to the new ftp directory and upgrade? What are the main differences between the two releases (ie: smail vs exim), that I need to look up to make sure they work after upgrading

Re: Hamm -> Slink PROBLEMS

EMAIL PROTECTED]|___/ _ On Sat, 27 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am having problems upgrading my new box from hamm to slink. I have > installed > apt for hamm. I did changed my /etc/apt/sourc

Re: Hamm -> Slink PROBLEMS

Subject: Hamm -> Slink PROBLEMS Date: Sat, Feb 27, 1999 at 08:55:20PM -0500 In reply to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > I am having problems upgrading my new box from hamm to slink. I have > installed > apt for hamm. I did

Re: Hamm -> Slink PROBLEMS

On Sat, Feb 27, 1999 at 08:55:20PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am having problems upgrading my new box from hamm to slink. I have > installed > apt for hamm. I did changed my /etc/apt/sources.list file to point to > ftp://ftp.us.debia.org/frozen main contrib non-free. I

Hamm -> Slink PROBLEMS

I am having problems upgrading my new box from hamm to slink. I have installed apt for hamm. I did changed my /etc/apt/sources.list file to point to ftp://ftp.us.debia.org/frozen main contrib non-free. I then did an apt-get update followed by an apt-get dist-upgrade. While trying to d/l, apt

Major System Hangup problem (hamm)

I am running hamm (2.0.34) on a 486DX2/66; I am also running dos+windows 3.11 on another partition. Linux is on the first partition, and I'm am using lilo. My computer has a strange problem. First it will start working only after worming up (it neads to be on for about a minute bifure i can

Re: upgrade from hamm to slink

Micha Feigin wrote: > > How do i upgrade from hamm to slink? For a newcomer, it might be better for you to wait untill slink is officially released as Debian 2.1. Then you can get a CD of slink and install it. If you are currently using dselect to update against hamm v

upgrade from hamm to slink

How do i upgrade from hamm to slink?

Re: hamm/pppconfig?

Larry Fletcher writes: > I thought pressing on all of my previous defaults except for the > change from PAP to CHAT might be causing pppconfig to think that nothing > was changed, so I was trying to get rid of my defaults and start over. No, pressing enter like that is just like re-entering every

Re: hamm/pppconfig?

John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Larry writes: >> Can anyone tell what went wrong and how to fix it? > >In /etc/ppp/pap-secrets you will find a line like: > > ay903 * "" The line turned out to be: molec3 * password >Change it to: > > ay903" * qwertyuip >

Re: hamm/pppconfig?

g was changed, so I was trying to get rid of my defaults and start over. >> What files should I delete to get pppconfig back to where it was when I >> first installed hamm? > >When you first installed hamm the ppp package installed a set of default >files. Pppconfig ignored these an

Re: hamm/pppconfig?

Larry writes: > Can anyone tell what went wrong and how to fix it? The first one is a normal 'chat' login. You expect turn>: The server sends 'Type "lafn" and :' and you repond with ay903^M it then sends 'Password:' and you send (your password, I assum

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >