Re: Re: ICQ programs for Debian GNU/Linux

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1375824702.9032.0.camel@Petr

Skype, Yahoo, ICQ, MSN Messenger search engine tip

search-im is a brand new, user contributed Skype, Yahoo, AIM, ICQ, MSN Messenger search engine community created to help messenger users connect with each other based on their profession, hobbies, and other interests(not their name). Please feel free to have a try and add yourself, your service

Re: trouble installing pidgin (was: trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch)

On Tuesday 25 September 2007 12:19, Jeff D wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, tom arnall wrote: > > On Tuesday 25 September 2007 11:24, Jeff D wrote: > >> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, tom arnall wrote: > >>> Peter, > >>> > >>> i tried another approach. i just read that qq has been merged with the > >>> new gaim

Re: trouble installing pidgin (was: trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch)

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, tom arnall wrote: On Tuesday 25 September 2007 11:24, Jeff D wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, tom arnall wrote: Peter, i tried another approach. i just read that qq has been merged with the new gaim, called pidgin, so i attempted to install pidgin. i was able to configure the

Re: trouble installing pidgin (was: trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch)

On Tuesday 25 September 2007 11:24, Jeff D wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, tom arnall wrote: > > Peter, > > > > i tried another approach. i just read that qq has been merged with the > > new gaim, called pidgin, so i attempted to install pidgin. i was able to > > configure the source but compile died

Re: trouble installing pidgin (was: trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch)

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, tom arnall wrote: On Tuesday 25 September 2007 11:24, Jeff D wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, tom arnall wrote: Peter, i tried another approach. i just read that qq has been merged with the new gaim, called pidgin, so i attempted to install pidgin. i was able to configure the

Re: trouble installing pidgin (was: trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch)

On Tuesday 25 September 2007 11:24, Jeff D wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, tom arnall wrote: > > Peter, > > > > i tried another approach. i just read that qq has been merged with the > > new gaim, called pidgin, so i attempted to install pidgin. i was able to > > configure the source but compile died

Re: trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch

On Tuesday 25 September 2007 10:40, Jeff D wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, tom arnall wrote: > > On Monday 24 September 2007 14:19, Andrei Popescu wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 02:05:45PM -0700, tom arnall wrote: > >>> I am trying to get the windows icq progra

Re: trouble installing pidgin (was: trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch)

On 09/25/2007 01:16 PM, tom arnall wrote: > warning: pidgin-2.2.0-0.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID > a9464aa9warning: pidgin-2.2.0-0.src.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key > ID a9464aa9pidgin_2.2.0-1_i386.deb generated > debian:/home/kloro/zips/pidginRH# > debian:/home/klor

Re: trouble installing pidgin (was: trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch)

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, tom arnall wrote: Peter, i tried another approach. i just read that qq has been merged with the new gaim, called pidgin, so i attempted to install pidgin. i was able to configure the source but compile died in the 'make'. with the .rpm i got a .deb file, which i then did 'd

trouble installing pidgin (was: trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch)

Peter, i tried another approach. i just read that qq has been merged with the new gaim, called pidgin, so i attempted to install pidgin. i was able to configure the source but compile died in the 'make'. with the .rpm i got a .deb file, which i then did 'dpkg -i' on. e'thing seemed to go normal

Re: trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, tom arnall wrote: On Monday 24 September 2007 14:19, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 02:05:45PM -0700, tom arnall wrote: I am trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch. I can get it to install, but when I try to run it the thing dies and I

Re: trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch

> On Monday 24 September 2007 14:19, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 02:05:45PM -0700, tom arnall wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I am trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work > > > > > >

Re: trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch

4, you wrote: > > > > > On 24/09/2007, tom arnall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Monday 24 September 2007 14:19, Andrei Popescu wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 02:05:45PM -0700, tom arnall wrote: > > > > >

Re: trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch

On Monday 24 September 2007 14:19, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 02:05:45PM -0700, tom arnall wrote: > > I am trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch. I can > > get it to install, but when I try to run it the thing dies and I get: > > I kn

Re: trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch

On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 02:05:45PM -0700, tom arnall wrote: > I am trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch. I can get > it > to install, but when I try to run it the thing dies and I get: I know this is not a real solution, but do you have any particular reason

trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch

I am trying to get the windows icq program QQ to work under etch. I can get it to install, but when I try to run it the thing dies and I get: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/QQ/Africa2003$ wine C:\\Program\ Files\\QQ\\Africa2003\\QQ.exe & [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.wine/dri

Trying `Wine' (was: ICQ with Linux)

On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:24:37PM +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote: >> I've been following the various suggestions come from this list >> about the possibilities Linux offers to chat: >> my family want to use `messenger' and ICQ, and before resigning myself >> to us

Re: ICQ with Linux

I have not tried ICQ or Jabber yet but you didn't mention Kopete and it manages them as it manages MSN and yahoo or other. Maybe give it a try ? Rodolfo Medina wrote: I've been following the various suggestions come from this list about the possibilities Linux offers to chat: my f

Re: ICQ with Linux (was: Chatting with Debian GNU/Linux)

On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 10:24:37PM +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > I've been following the various suggestions come from this list > about the possibilities Linux offers to chat: > my family want to use `messenger' and ICQ, and before resigning myself > to use MS Windows I w

Re: ICQ with Linux (was: Chatting with Debian GNU/Linux)

On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 22:24 +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > I've been following the various suggestions come from this list > about the possibilities Linux offers to chat: > my family want to use `messenger' and ICQ, and before resigning myself > to use MS Windows I w

ICQ with Linux (was: Chatting with Debian GNU/Linux)

I've been following the various suggestions come from this list about the possibilities Linux offers to chat: my family want to use `messenger' and ICQ, and before resigning myself to use MS Windows I wanted to check all the possibilities. My impression is that `gaim' manages

Gaim and multiple ICQ accounts

Hi all, I'm running Debian Sid. A weird thing happened the other day after an update. I have accounts with all the different IM protocols, msn, yim, aim, gmail, icq, and have been running gaim just fine. I have 3 different ICQ accounts on there an have not had a problem. Had the same ru

Re: Kopete, ICQ 10 minutes limit

>>Hi, >> >> I'm using ICQ on notebook with windows XP, and when working on Sarge , i'm >>using kopete in KDE with same UIN. It always worked nice, but when i want >>to connect kopete to ICQ on linux, it dislayed an error message for few >>we

Kopete, ICQ 10 minutes limit

Hi, I'm using ICQ on notebook with windows XP, and when working on Sarge , i'm using kopete in KDE with same UIN. It always worked nice, but when i want to connect kopete to ICQ on linux, it dislayed an error message for few weeks ago. Message is still same: "The a

Re: disappointment with linux icq clients

change the send behavior nor any decent font sets to choose from. > :( I assume you're referring to the fonts in the message history pane? Ya, they "weirded out" on me one day and I have no idea how to get the old ones back. To me, they're too large now. -- David P Ja

Re: disappointment with linux icq clients

On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 10:21:55PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: > I've always found them hard to use. I use GTK2 apps with Fluxbox. I like Gaim. When I need to use it a lot I just give it its own virtual desktop, let it clutter windows all over, and wait for it to go beep. Then I context switch.

Re: disappointment with linux icq clients

William Ballard wrote: I don't find them the least bit strange. Perfectly intutive. Enter connection parameters, connect, talk. Goes beep beep, window pops up with conversation, talk. I've always found them hard to use. Right now, for example, I am trying to use Kopete after getting used

Re: disappointment with linux icq clients

I don't know whats the question as I've never seen this thread in the list, but if I understand the subject line correctly, I would say Psi is better than kopete in some ways. I've tried to find a messenger client in linux that I like best, but found none, until I found Psi is included in debian pa

Re: disappointment with linux icq clients

On Friday 26 November 2004 14:08, William Ballard wrote: > I suppose you want little thought bubbles to pop up in the corner of > your screen on top of your other apps. You're probably having trouble > with your window manager. Kopete has this feature. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: disappointment with linux icq clients

On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 04:58:49PM -0200, Frederico Rodrigues Abraham wrote: > Hi... Does anybody else have the feeling that simply no linux icq > client that is available nowadays fits your needs? No indication of what your "needs" are. > licq, gaim, kopete, they al

Re: disappointment with linux icq clients

Moin! > Hi... Does anybody else have the feeling that simply no linux icq > client that is available nowadays fits your needs? I have found that bitlbee fits my needs. It might be worth a look at, it might be a waste of time. Just wanted to show one more "client" :) --

Re: disappointment with linux icq clients

On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 04:58:49PM -0200, Frederico Rodrigues Abraham wrote: > licq, gaim, kopete, they all have this strange interface... > nothing is simple to do or to find... I don't find them the least bit strange. Perfectly intutive. Enter connection parameters, connect, talk. Goes b

disappointment with linux icq clients

Hi... Does anybody else have the feeling that simply no linux icq client that is available nowadays fits your needs? licq, gaim, kopete, they all have this strange interface... nothing is simple to do or to find... i wish there was a miranda port for linux... that would be nice

ABOUT ICQ BULGARIA

hi i've quetion about ICQ -- Multi-User Installation from where i can dowload --Install the Debian JDK. --ICQ tar ball ?? thank you - http://www.elmaz.com/ - Запознанства! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Re: ICQ behind router/firewall [SOLVED]

On March 1, 2003 10:09 am, ScruLoose wrote: > On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 09:01:43AM -0800, Leo Spalteholz wrote: > > On February 28, 2003 11:09 pm, ScruLoose wrote: > > > Well, I went to apt-get.org and found a place to get Licq as a > > > .deb, and it works like a charm, straight outta the box. I >

Re: ICQ behind router/firewall [SOLVED]

On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 09:01:43AM -0800, Leo Spalteholz wrote: > On February 28, 2003 11:09 pm, ScruLoose wrote: > > Well, I went to apt-get.org and found a place to get Licq as a > > .deb, and it works like a charm, straight outta the box. I still > > wouldn't mind knowing what caused the other

Re: ICQ behind router/firewall [SOLVED]

On February 28, 2003 11:09 pm, ScruLoose wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 02:34:12PM -0500, Scruloose wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > Using Trillian under windo~1 ... flawless ICQ > > connectivity... not using any port-forwarding or any such. Under > > debian, I c

Re: ICQ behind router/firewall [SOLVED]

On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 02:34:12PM -0500, Scruloose wrote: > Hey all, > > Using Trillian under windo~1 ... flawless ICQ > connectivity... not using any port-forwarding or any such. Under debian, I > can't seem to get a client to work. > > GnomeICU will send and

Re: ICQ behind router/firewall

ort I need to > > forward for the "so-and-so is online" packets to get in? Is there a client > > for Linux that's as smart as the windo~1 ones (to work behind a firewall > > without port forwarding)? > > Assuming that your firewall closes off whatever port i

Re: ICQ behind router/firewall

line" packets to get in? Is there a client > for Linux that's as smart as the windo~1 ones (to work behind a firewall > without port forwarding)? Assuming that your firewall closes off whatever port it is that ICQ uses (5190 if memory serves... though it usually doesn't. ;),

Re: ICQ behind router/firewall

On Sunday 16 February 2003 20:34, Scruloose wrote: > And Alicq seems to have imploded on install. Run it and it just exits > instantly with an error message (something about username or password not > supplied, IIRC), and when I edit its config file, I get one long line of > non-ascii garbage. No

ICQ behind router/firewall

e both get flawless ICQ connectivity... not using any port-forwarding or any such. Under debian, I can't seem to get a client to work. GnomeICU will send and receive messages, initiate/accept chat mode, and other people can see my status, but everybody always looks offline to me (except 2 users,

Re: Software that can be used with MSN - icq

On 15 Jan 2003, Michael Wardle wrote: > If you're looking for an instant messaging client that you can use to > chat with MSN users, try these: > * MSN Messenger for Linux > - no plugin required > - most similar to MSN Messenger > - > * GAIM >- use the MSN

FIXED: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

it or not, this fixed both ICQ and IRC DCC connections. Schweet. Thanks. -- .''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian admin and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a system msg20655/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

et up for masq. Hmm...I'm really not sure. I'm using Monmotha's rc.firewall script, and it works great for me. I scanned through it, but I'm really sure that it doesn't do any setup of these modules, or even load them. > > Can I point licq at the jabber icq server?

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 10:22:52AM -0700, Jeremy Nickurak wrote: > Jabber's icq functionality comes from a component called an "Agent" That would be a "transport" or "gateway": http://www.jabber.org/admin/componentadminguide.html#gateways -- Jamin W.

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

the irc client and that machine has a public (non-NATted) IP. | > There're no ICQ modules, because | > a) stateful firewalling mostly obviates the need for this, and b) the | > NetFilter folks have a policy that they won't write or support modules | > for protocols that d

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 05:17, Paul Johnson wrote: > Someone should go tell the netfilter folks about the jabber icq server > and the licq client sometime. Re: jabber icq server Link? As far as I'm aware, there is no such thing as a "jabber icq server". Jabber's icq

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

re connection tracking modules that correct this so that both active and passive work. > > Can I point licq at the jabber icq server? > > You should be able to with icqv7-t and jabber installed, though I have > yet to try this myself. Don't think this will work. Granted, I hav

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

ding work for you in general? Yes, but DCC connections in IRC don't work, and FTP works passive mode only. ftp-data is either 20 or 22, I need 21 to go to a specific host when I'm set up for masq. > Can I point licq at the jabber icq server? You should be able to with icqv7-t and j

RE: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

> -Original Message- > From: Paul Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday 19 December 2002 13:17 > To: debian-user List > Subject: Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:58:53PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > > Yes, there is. ip

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

k. The only config options I know of is the one that lets you specify which remotes ports are to be considered IRC or FTP (I think it's and 6667 and 21, by default). Does masquerading work for you in general? > > There're no ICQ modules, because > > a) stateful firewal

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

some trick to iptables to prod it into service? I suspect the latter is true, as I've tried it with just inserting the modules and it didn't work as expected. > There're no ICQ modules, because > a) stateful firewalling mostly obviates the need for this, and b) the > NetFilt

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 07:35:11AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > Is there a way to allow protocols that may require connections to go > back to the client like ftp, irc and icq to do so while doing IP > Masquerading? I'm open to do this with a 2.2 or 2.4 kernel, either > way w

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is there a way to allow protocols that may require connections to go >back to the client like ftp, irc and icq to do so while doing IP >Masquerading? I'm open to do this with a 2.2 o

ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

Is there a way to allow protocols that may require connections to go back to the client like ftp, irc and icq to do so while doing IP Masquerading? I'm open to do this with a 2.2 or 2.4 kernel, either way works for me. -- .''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :

Re: [debian-user] Which ICQ Client is better?

>--[sean finney]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > support some form of text-only mode? for icq i've used licq and micq, > one of which has a text-mode plugin, the other *is* text mode, but > i'm not happy with either because the former doesn't keep history > in

Re: [debian-user] Which ICQ Client is better?

>--[Meir Kriheli]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tuesday 12 November 2002 18:52, Pontus Edvardsson wrote: > I use sim-icq. It's really good, supports version 8 of ICQ protocol (ICQ 2001) > with lots of other features as well. It is a qt/kde app, and they have a deb > for

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

on Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:27:19PM -0500, Edward Guldemond insinuated: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:03:18PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > > ;) no really though, thanks. give me text over gui any day! > > (dude, whoever thought that phrase would pass my lips ...) > > > > And should you need to move

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:03:18PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > ;) no really though, thanks. give me text over gui any day! (dude, > whoever thought that phrase would pass my lips ...) > And should you need to move to X, I hear that 'screen' works well in xterm/kterm/gnome-terminal/eterm...

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

on Tue, 19 Nov 2002 02:28:58PM -0600, Michael Heironimus insinuated: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:24:26PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > > now, after all of that, i have centericq v4.8.4 up and running, and > > it's still buggy. the AIM protocol hates me: > > > anyone have any suggestions? > > I

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:24:26PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > now, after all of that, i have centericq v4.8.4 up and running, and > it's still buggy. the AIM protocol hates me: > anyone have any suggestions? I suggest trying the current version (4.8.7) instead of that old one. There may or m

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

on Tue, 19 Nov 2002 08:44:23AM -0500, Nori Heikkinen insinuated: > on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:37:34PM +, Colin Watson insinuated: > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 05:31:04PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > > > okay, this is good to know. i guess then my /etc/apt/sources.list is > > > borked? because i

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:44:23AM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > wa-hoo! of course ... didn't even think to look there. changed to > 644 (btw, can anyone enlighten me on specifying the first bit (*0*644) > all the time? i never have, and haven't had any problems), and all > works. Cool. As fo

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 10:37:34PM +, Colin Watson insinuated: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 05:31:04PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > > okay, this is good to know. i guess then my /etc/apt/sources.list is > > borked? because i get this every time: > > > > orange:~> apt-get source centericq -t unsta

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 05:31:04PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 05:04:38PM -0500, Stephen Gran insinuated: > > apt-get install won't let you do it as a user, but apt-get source will > > download the source - this is because you're not actually installing > > anything to the sy

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 05:04:38PM -0500, Stephen Gran insinuated: > This one time, at band camp, Nori Heikkinen said: > > on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 08:49:36PM +, Colin Watson insinuated: > > > Firstly, don't be in / when grabbing source packages. :) You don't > > > need to be root, either. > > > > well

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

This one time, at band camp, Nori Heikkinen said: > on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 08:49:36PM +, Colin Watson insinuated: > > Firstly, don't be in / when grabbing source packages. :) You don't > > need to be root, either. > > well, i have needed to be of late, and just haven't worried about it > recently

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 04:35:39PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 08:49:36PM +, Colin Watson insinuated: > > Firstly, don't be in / when grabbing source packages. :) You don't > > need to be root, either. > > well, i have needed to be of late, and just haven't worried about

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 08:49:36PM +, Colin Watson insinuated: > Firstly, don't be in / when grabbing source packages. :) You don't > need to be root, either. well, i have needed to be of late, and just haven't worried about it recently ... whenever i try to run apt as myself, i get the following:

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 03:32:01PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 03:14:38PM -0500, Edward Guldemond insinuated: > > Download the latest source package with "apt-get source centericq" > > from unstable > > okay, got thus far ... > > > and roll it with "dpkg-buildpackage -us -

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 03:42:25PM -0500, Stephen Gran insinuated: > You have to be in the top level directory of the source, so for > centericq from unstable, that would be centericq-4.8.7, I'm > guessing. pardon the ignorance, but where's the "top level directory" for centericq-4.8.7? > No need t

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

This one time, at band camp, Nori Heikkinen said: > on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 03:14:38PM -0500, Edward Guldemond insinuated: > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:02:14PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > > > however, as i pointed out in an earlier thread, i've never gotten it > > > to work right with the AIM prot

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 03:14:38PM -0500, Edward Guldemond insinuated: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:02:14PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > > however, as i pointed out in an earlier thread, i've never gotten it > > to work right with the AIM protocol. sean, if you get it working, > > want to come look

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:02:14PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > however, as i pointed out in an earlier thread, i've never gotten it > to work right with the AIM protocol. sean, if you get it working, > want to come look at mine? :) > > Download the latest source package with "apt-get source

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:34:40PM -0500, sean finney wrote: > what i'm most interested in is a text-only aim clone though. gaim is > nice and all, but on my desktop it's aesthetically horrible with all > those big fonts and buttons (which can be reduced somewhat, but not > completely). also, bec

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

on Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:57:54PM -0500, Edward Guldemond insinuated: > On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:34:40PM -0500, sean finney wrote: > > what i'm most interested in is a text-only aim clone though. gaim > > is nice and all, but on my desktop it's aesthetically horrible > > with all those big fonts an

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 12:34:40PM -0500, sean finney wrote: > what i'm most interested in is a text-only aim clone though. gaim is > nice and all, but on my desktop it's aesthetically horrible with all > those big fonts and buttons (which can be reduced somewhat, but not > completely). also, bec

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

hi everyone, on the topic of aim/icq clients, does anyone know of clients that support some form of text-only mode? for icq i've used licq and micq, one of which has a text-mode plugin, the other *is* text mode, but i'm not happy with either because the former doesn't keep histo

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:44:43 + Meir Kriheli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 12 November 2002 18:52, Pontus Edvardsson wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've > > checked out gaim, licq & kicq2.

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Tuesday 12 November 2002 18:52, Pontus Edvardsson wrote: > Hi all, > > What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out > gaim, licq & kicq2. Is there any better ones, with closer resemblance the > original windows client? > > Thanks in ad

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 04:49:49PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > Have you found a decent, free jabber server out there that supports MSN > and ICQ properly? The ones I've tried all seem to have either flakey > (at best) ICQ support or no MSN support (yes, some of my friends are > la

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

>>>>> "Rob" == Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rob> Have you found a decent, free jabber server out there that supports Rob> MSN and ICQ properly? The ones I've tried all seem to have either Rob> flakey (at best) ICQ support or no MSN s

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

though (B>you'll need a fully qualified domain name if you want your server to be (B>able to talk to other servers. (B> (B>On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 22:49, Rob Weir wrote: (B> (B> (B>>Have you found a decent, free jabber server out there that supports MSN (B>&

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

vers. On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 22:49, Rob Weir wrote: > Have you found a decent, free jabber server out there that supports MSN > and ICQ properly? The ones I've tried all seem to have either flakey > (at best) ICQ support or no MSN support (yes, some of my friends are > lame;).

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

> (B> (B>Have you found a decent, free jabber server out there that supports MSN (B>and ICQ properly? The ones I've tried all seem to have either flakey (B>(at best) ICQ support or no MSN support (yes, some of my friends are (B>lame;). (B> (B> (BNot yet. Pl

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 02:11:32PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:52:30PM +0100, Pontus Edvardsson wrote: > > > What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out > > gaim, licq & kicq2. Is there any better ones,

Re: [debian-user] Which ICQ Client is better?

on Tue, 12 Nov 2002 10:25:30PM +0100, Rüdiger Kuhlmann insinuated: > For a terminal ICQ, try mICQ (the cvs version even has support for > UTF8 messages, the first OSS ICQ client doing so). Or centericq if > you depend on multiple protocols. heh. i got centericq because i wanted ICQ a

THANKS! I've made my choice... was [Re: Which ICQ Client is better?]

Thanks everyone that responded! I've looked at the ones I did'nt know about and despite all, my choice fell on gaim since it's greater capabilities, ie multiple protocols and such. Pontus On Tuesday 12 November 2002 19.52, Pontus Edvardsson wrote: > Hi all, > > What is

Re: [debian-user] Which ICQ Client is better?

>--[Paul Johnson]--<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:52:30PM +0100, Pontus Edvardsson wrote: > > What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out > > gaim, licq & kicq2. Is there any better ones, with closer resemblance

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

i've enjoyed using centericq - but i like curses-style interfaces. On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:52:30PM +0100, Pontus Edvardsson wrote: > > > What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out >

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:52:30PM +0100, Pontus Edvardsson wrote: > What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out > gaim, licq & kicq2. Is there any better ones, with closer resemblance the > original windows client? In my experience GnomeICU tend

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

At 2002-11-12T18:52:30Z, Pontus Edvardsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out > gaim, licq & kicq2. I like GAIM, mainly for its ability to support many different IM systems. I have one ICQ, two AIM, a

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:52:30PM +0100, Pontus Edvardsson wrote: > What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out > gaim, licq & kicq2. Is there any better ones, with closer resemblance the > original windows client? My personal favorite is centeri

Re: Which ICQ Client is better?

On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:52:30PM +0100, Pontus Edvardsson wrote: > What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out > gaim, licq & kicq2. Is there any better ones, with closer resemblance the > original windows client? I think licq is the best

Which ICQ Client is better?

Hi all, What is the best/most useful ICQ client in your opinion? I've checked out gaim, licq & kicq2. Is there any better ones, with closer resemblance the original windows client? Thanks in advance, Pontus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of &qu

Re: [debian-user] RE: Most stable MSN and ICQ support?

dows stuff has better protocol support and the API needs > > are pretty mild. > Hmm... Trillian... that sounds familiar... oh, that's right, it's the > proprietary ripoff of Gaim. Reason enough to not use it. :) *giggle* Trillian is the most buggy ICQ client you can think of. It&

Re: Most stable MSN and ICQ support?

On Friday 06 September 2002 5:25 am, Alex Malinovich wrote: > On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 23:13, Josh Rehman wrote: > > I think the best bet for a stable client is to run a good Windows client > > like Trillian under Wine. In fact, Wine seems perfect for this purpose, > > since the windows stuff has bet

RE: Most stable MSN and ICQ support?

On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 23:13, Josh Rehman wrote: > I think the best bet for a stable client is to run a good Windows client > like Trillian under Wine. In fact, Wine seems perfect for this purpose, > since the windows stuff has better protocol support and the API needs > are pretty mild. Hmm... Tr

  1   2   3   4   >