e/devel/lib:."
>
> I have a dim memory that when compiling cross-compilers that the
> '.' directory is a problem. Commenting this out allows the kernel
> compile to proceed. What's strange is that I've had this for many
> years without any kernel-compile pr
27;.' directory is a problem. Commenting this out allows the kernel
compile to proceed. What's strange is that I've had this for many
years without any kernel-compile problem. No longer!
There may be some gcc docs that warn of this, not sure exactly where,
but it might shed mo
On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 13:35:00 -0400 (EDT), Frank Miles wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>> ...
>> I'm guessing that elks-libc is what is needed. Is that package installed
>> on your system?
>> ...
>
> No, it's not installed. Sure seems strange, requiring a 16-bit library
> for the build of a 64-bit system
Thanks to Stan, Stephen, and Maderios!
-
Stan wrote:
Do you get the same error using the (new) Debian kernel method?
$ make KDEB_PKGVERSION=custom.1.0 deb-pkg
I'll have to learn more about the new method for the future.
For right now, unfortunately the answer is yes, I get the same e
$ uname -a
Linux debian 2.6.39.1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jun 7 01:40:05 CEST 2011 x86_64
GNU/Linux
is a self-build (rt patch emu kernel) with source from kernel.org and at
least 2.6.39-2 from the repositories was ok too, didn't tested the
upgrade to 2.6.39-3 until now, which btw. still is named 2.6.39-
On 07/16/2011 08:19 PM, Frank Miles wrote:
I just tried compiling the kernel for My 'wheezy' system (2.6.39) [amd64].
As I've done many times - using
make-kpkg --revision N kernel_image
Hi
For my part:
make-kpkg kernel_image --initrd
and it works.
greetings
Maderios
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On 7/16/2011 1:19 PM, Frank Miles wrote:
> I just tried compiling the kernel for My 'wheezy' system (2.6.39) [amd64].
> As I've done many times - using
> make-kpkg --revision N kernel_image
> But with the recent linux-source update - shortly after starting I get:
Do you get the same error usin
On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 14:19:17 -0400 (EDT), Frank Miles wrote:
>
> I just tried compiling the kernel for My 'wheezy' system (2.6.39) [amd64].
> As I've done many times - using
> make-kpkg --revision N kernel_image
> But with the recent linux-source update - shortly after starting I get:
>
>
I just tried compiling the kernel for My 'wheezy' system (2.6.39) [amd64].
As I've done many times - using
make-kpkg --revision N kernel_image
But with the recent linux-source update - shortly after starting I get:
CC arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included f
On Sat, Jan 16 2010, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>>> Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>>> If this is the latest version of make-kpkg, did you
>>> cp /usr/share/kernel-package/examples/etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs
>>> /etc/ke
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
I have compiled a custom kernel, using 'make-kpkg clean && make-kpkg
--initrd --revision=sage.1.0 kernel-image', 'sage' being the name of
my machine. I then installed it, using 'dpkg -i
linux
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>>
>> I have compiled a custom kernel, using 'make-kpkg clean && make-kpkg
>> --initrd --revision=sage.1.0 kernel-image', 'sage' being the name of
>> my machine. I then installed it, using 'dpkg -i
>> linux-image-2.6
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
I have compiled a custom kernel, using 'make-kpkg clean && make-kpkg
--initrd --revision=sage.1.0 kernel-image', 'sage' being the name of
my machine. I then installed it, using 'dpkg -i
linux-image-2.6.30_sage.1.0_amd64.deb'. I had thought that would be
enough to create t
I have compiled a custom kernel, using 'make-kpkg clean && make-kpkg
--initrd --revision=sage.1.0 kernel-image', 'sage' being the name of
my machine. I then installed it, using 'dpkg -i
linux-image-2.6.30_sage.1.0_amd64.deb'. I had thought that would be
enough to create the initrd necessary to bo
This is a bug in the 2.6.30 source. The quick work-around for this is:
update-initramfs -c -k "uname"
"uname" being whatever you've named your custom kernel & do it without
the quotations.
Check to see if there is now an initrd-image file for your kernel in the /
boot directory & if th
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 01:06:51PM +0200, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 01:13 -0700, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> > Remove just the word "single" and you should be good to go.
> >
> > Don Quixote
>
> Lucky Don Quixote :), obviously you never have been hitten by fsck not
>
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 01:13 -0700, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Soren Orel wrote:
>> > hmmm.. it works, but I have to hit Ctrl+D at every boot... :D
>>
>> On some of your vmlinux lines in your menu.lst you have the word
>> "single". That boots you into si
> hmmm.. it works, but I have to hit Ctrl+D at every boot... :D
>
> http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/5726/screenshotual.png
>
You got that error using make-kpkg, or just as a general kernel error?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
> hmmm.. it works, but I have to hit Ctrl+D at every boot... :D
>
> http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/5726/screenshotual.png
>
You got that error using make-kpkg, or just as a general kernel error?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
It only brings up this error message on a VirtualBox machine.. :D
I tried to compile the vanillia kernel on two other machines, and it worked,
booted without error.. :)
The VirtualBox machine was only to try, how it works, thank you!
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> On Sun
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 01:13 -0700, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Soren Orel wrote:
> > hmmm.. it works, but I have to hit Ctrl+D at every boot... :D
>
> On some of your vmlinux lines in your menu.lst you have the word
> "single". That boots you into single-u
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 5:39 AM, Soren Orel wrote:
> hmmm.. it works, but I have to hit Ctrl+D at every boot... :D
On some of your vmlinux lines in your menu.lst you have the word
"single". That boots you into single-user mode, that you exit from by
hitting Ctrl-D.
Remove just the word "single"
hmmm.. it works, but I have to hit Ctrl+D at every boot... :D
http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/5726/screenshotual.png
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Siggy Brentrup wrote:
> Sorry that I didn't see this thread earlier.
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 11:17 +0200, Soren Orel wrote:
> > it works!
Sorry that I didn't see this thread earlier.
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 11:17 +0200, Soren Orel wrote:
> it works!
>
> I just forget:
>
> cp arch/x86/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.30-1
>
>
> and:
> mkinitramfs -o /boot/initrd.img-2.6.30-1 2.6.30.1
% apt-get install kernel-package
% man make-kpk
it works!
I just forget:
cp arch/x86/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.30-1
and:
mkinitramfs -o /boot/initrd.img-2.6.30-1 2.6.30.1
and to edit grub:
title kernel 2.6.30.1-barminev
root (hd0,1)
kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.30-1 root=/dev/hda2 ro
initrd /initrd.img-2.6.30-1
thank you!!! alias köszi! :D
O
Aioanei Rares wrote:
mkinitrd is a standard command on all linux systems, so you can check
its manual page. Maybe man update-initramfs can help too. Best of
luck.
On 7/17/09, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
In your Grub menu.lst file, there are some lines that look like this one:
initrd
mkinitrd is a standard command on all linux systems, so you can check
its manual page. Maybe man update-initramfs can help too. Best of
luck.
On 7/17/09, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote:
> In your Grub menu.lst file, there are some lines that look like this one:
>
> initrd /initrd.img-2
In your Grub menu.lst file, there are some lines that look like this one:
initrd /initrd.img-2.6.26-2-686
You need a line like that just below the item for the kernel you're
trying to boot, except that you want the initrd version to match the
new kernel version.
initrd stands for Init
thank you for the quick replies :O
I just only did, what I mentioned in the starting mail:S
ls -la /boot:
http://pastebin.com/f7dc58737
cat /boot/grub/menu.lst
http://pastebin.com/f566152fc
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Don Quixote de la Mancha <
quix...@dulcineatech.com> wrote:
> Did you b
Did you build and install your initrd? You might need to load a
module to mount your root filesystem, and if so it should be in the
initrd.
The initrd also needs to be named in your grub entry.
It's not enough just to build and install the module, because those
are accessible only after your roo
trying in single mode:
http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/7868/screenshotsrf.png
trying in normal mode:
http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/6290/screenshot1u.png
I forget to tell, that this pc uses lvm :S
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Aioanei Rares wrote:
> Soren Orel wrote:
>
>> debian lenny
Soren Orel wrote:
debian lenny
I download 2.6.30-1 source
tar -xjf linux-2.6.30.1.tar.bz2
cd linux-2.6.30.1
cp /boot/config-2.6.26-2-686 ./.config
apt-get install make gcc libncurses5-dev
make menuconfig (replace M to *):
Device Drivers - Multiple device support (RAID and LVM) - Device
mapper
debian lenny
I download 2.6.30-1 source
tar -xjf linux-2.6.30.1.tar.bz2
cd linux-2.6.30.1
cp /boot/config-2.6.26-2-686 ./.config
apt-get install make gcc libncurses5-dev
make menuconfig (replace M to *):
Device Drivers - Multiple device support (RAID and LVM) - Device mapper
support
File systems
also sprach Murat Ugur EMINOGLU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.05.04.1144 +0100]:
> i compiled kernel on debian etch (two times). But i have a same problem
>
> No raid arrays. No Lvm
You have not provided any details, such as the configuration and
command line used, so we can't really help you.
> ALER
Dear all,
i compiled kernel on debian etch (two times). But i have a same problem
No raid arrays. No Lvm
compiled 2.6.21 , 2.6.25 same problem
Begin: Assembling all Md arrays
mdadm : No array found in config file on automatically
failure : failed to assemble all arrays
Check root=bootarg cat
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 02:54:55 -0400 (CDT)
"Orestes Leal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe this modules doesn't work 'yet' with that kernel,
> one Question, How do you build your kernel?
> it´s suggested by linux that the sources of the kernel
> must not be placed in /usr/src
>
> for example my k
Maybe this modules doesn't work 'yet' with that kernel,
one Question, How do you build your kernel?
it´s suggested by linux that the sources of the kernel
must not be placed in /usr/src
for example my kernel sources are in /kernelsource
El Dom, 12 de Agosto de 2007, 2:08 pm, L.V.Gandhi escribió:
I was trying to compile kernel src from backports with alsa modules
and ipw3945 modules. src was tar-.gz files fo this modules.
I get error like this
/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/include/adriver.h: In function
'snd_pci_orig_save_state':
/usr/src/modules/alsa-driver/include/adriver.h:1099: error: t
> What should be kernel compile -processor type for
> Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T5500 @ 1.66GHz
> --
> L.V.Gandhi
> http://lvgandhi.tripod.com/
> linux user No.205042
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "
What should be kernel compile -processor type for
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T5500 @ 1.66GHz
--
L.V.Gandhi
http://lvgandhi.tripod.com/
linux user No.205042
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ismael Valladolid Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
[...]
> The more customized your kernel to your system, the better. But often
> improvements don't compensate the amount of work it requires to end up
> with a kernel fully optimized to your system.
>
> I usually use Debian kernel's config
Bernard Adrian escribe:
> Should i understand my system would work better if i install the same
> kernel without initrd ?
The more customized your kernel to your system, the better. But often
improvements don't compensate the amount of work it requires to end up
with a kernel fully optimized to yo
I wrote:
> For a distribution kernel it provides support for all possible
> permutations and combinations of hardware. I don't know of any
> advantages for a custom kernel.
Manoj Srivastava writes:
> Well, I have a fully encrypted laptop hard drive, apart from a 42MB /boot
> (including encrypted
On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:30:19 -0600, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Amit Joshi writes:
>> What exactly are the advantages of using an initrd?
> For a distribution kernel it provides support for all possible
> permutations and combinations of hardware. I don't know of any
> advantages fo
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Initrd is an extra bit of complexity at bootup but it makes no difference
> once the system is up. Don't worry about it.
Ok. Thanks !
--
Bernard Adrian
http://www.bernadrian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
Bernard Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
[...]
> I'm compiling a custom kernel (2.6.1) with initrd for my system (AMD K6-II 64
Oups : i wanted to say kernel 2.6.17 and no 2.6.1
--
Bernard Adrian
http://www.bernadrian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Bernard Adrian writes:
> Should i understand my system would work better if i install the same
> kernel without initrd ?
Initrd is an extra bit of complexity at bootup but it makes no difference
once the system is up. Don't worry about it.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> For a distribution kernel it provides support for all possible permutations
> and combinations of hardware. I don't know of any advantages for a custom
> kernel.
Huh,
I'm compiling a custom kernel (2.6.1) with initrd for my system (AMD K6-II 64
Mo RA
Amit Joshi wrote:
On Saturday 11 November 2006 22:00, John Hasler wrote:
Amit Joshi writes:
What exactly are the advantages of using an initrd?
For a distribution kernel it provides support for all possible permutations
and combinations of hardware. I don't know of any advantages for a custom
On Saturday 11 November 2006 22:00, John Hasler wrote:
> Amit Joshi writes:
> > What exactly are the advantages of using an initrd?
>
> For a distribution kernel it provides support for all possible permutations
> and combinations of hardware. I don't know of any advantages for a custom
> kernel.
Amit Joshi writes:
> What exactly are the advantages of using an initrd?
For a distribution kernel it provides support for all possible permutations
and combinations of hardware. I don't know of any advantages for a custom
kernel.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 11 November 2006 20:00, Wackojacko wrote:
> Marc Wilson wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:10:53PM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >> make menuconfig
> >> make-kpkg --revision 1 kernel_image
> >
> > Don't you end up with an initrd that way? I admit to never wasting my
> > time with
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:10:53PM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
make menuconfig
make-kpkg --revision 1 kernel_image
Don't you end up with an initrd that way? I admit to never wasting my time
with kernel-package, but I thought you couldn't avoid one if you insisted
on using
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 02:10:53PM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> make menuconfig
> make-kpkg --revision 1 kernel_image
Don't you end up with an initrd that way? I admit to never wasting my time
with kernel-package, but I thought you couldn't avoid one if you insisted
on using it.
--
Marc Wil
I went to compile a vanilla kernel from kernel.org, and so read the
directions at the Debian site. They seem to me to be needlessly
complicated. Is there something in Debian which would prevent me from
compiling a kernel the good old fashioned way --
make menuconfig
make && make modules_instal
On Saturday 11 November 2006 00:56, Ed wrote:
> I went to compile a vanilla kernel from kernel.org, and so read the
> directions at the Debian site. They seem to me to be needlessly
> complicated. Is there something in Debian which would prevent me from
> compiling a kernel the good old fashioned
Ed wrote:
I went to compile a vanilla kernel from kernel.org, and so read the
directions at the Debian site. They seem to me to be needlessly
complicated. Is there something in Debian which would prevent me from
compiling a kernel the good old fashioned way --
make menuconfig
make && make m
I went to compile a vanilla kernel from kernel.org, and so read the
directions at the Debian site. They seem to me to be needlessly
complicated. Is there something in Debian which would prevent me from
compiling a kernel the good old fashioned way --
make menuconfig
make && make modules_insta
On 07.10.06 13:08, Fred J. wrote:
> I run my debian testing with 2.6.15 and fire a script to mount the floppy
> and it works, after compileing a new one "debian way", I fired the same
> script and it gave me
please set up your mailer to wrap lines up to 80 characters (72-75 is even
better)
>
Hi I run my debian testing with 2.6.15 and fire a script to mount the floppy and it works, after compileing a new one "debian way", I fired the same script and it gave me [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./m mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/fd0,missing codepage or other error
L.V.Gandhi wrote:
On 2/18/06, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do you get it if you log into a different windowing environment (Gnome,
fluxbox, edtc)?
Do you get it if you log in as a different user?
As I don't have other wm or other user I didn't try them.
The reason I aske
On 2/18/06, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you get it if you log into a different windowing environment (Gnome,
> fluxbox, edtc)?
>
> Do you get it if you log in as a different user?
As I don't have other wm or other user I didn't try them.
> Do you get it if you start with your old k
L.V.Gandhi wrote:
>Today I compiled kernel with same config but for enabling dell laptop
>option and disabling radeonfb. But when I boot with new kernel and do
>login through kdm, I get volume picture as given in attachment. I
>don't know how to remove it? Why does it appear?
>
>
>
Do you get it
On 2/18/06, Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> L.V.Gandhi wrote:
> > Today I compiled kernel with same config but for enabling dell laptop
> > option and disabling radeonfb. But when I boot with new kernel and do
> > login through kdm, I get volume picture as given in attachment. I
> > do
L.V.Gandhi wrote:
Today I compiled kernel with same config but for enabling dell laptop
option and disabling radeonfb. But when I boot with new kernel and do
login through kdm, I get volume picture as given in attachment. I
don't know how to remove it? Why does it appear?
You mean you login th
>
> How do I make the modules to install?
>
> make modules
> make modules_install
>
> does not do anything!
If you're using the kernel package tool, it will build a .deb kernel
(including modules). When you install that, it will install the modules.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Thursday 16 February 2006 20:41, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
>Reinstall of originalawk solved the problem. The kernel-image
>package builds and installs fine.
>
>How do I make the modules to install?
>
>make modules
>make modules_install
>
>does not do anything!
>
Well, the obvious question would have
Reinstall of originalawk solved the problem. The kernel-image
package builds and installs fine.
How do I make the modules to install?
make modules
make modules_install
does not do anything!
-ishwar
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
> I am trying to compile the kernel for enabling SMP
I am trying to compile the kernel for enabling SMP
with command:
fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-version="-smp" kernel-image
in /usr/src/linux directory and see the error message::
...
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.6.7'
COLUMNS=150 dpkg -l 'gcc*' perl dpkg 'libc6*' binutils ldso mak
I have compiled kernel on 5th feb in my sid box with 2.6.15. It is ok.
I think after that udev was updated. Today only I patched for
bootsplash. rest are same. Compiled kernel gives error while booting
udev failed. Though bootlog is enabled i did see those msgs in boot
file.
Anybody had this in las
Alejandro Bonilla Beeche wrote:
I have a box with Sid with the latest upgrades, (almost cause
dist-upgrade wants to remove a lot of stuff)
Anyway, fact is that I can't compile any kernel on the Linus tree. This,
for more than a month.
Could anyone please help me find out which package is
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 01:43:17PM -0500, Matt Price wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've compiled my own kernel numerous times but am not
> programming-literate; often I wish there was a howto that explained the
> significance of certain common problems that I seem to have over and
> over again. Haven't
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Matt Price wrote:
> I've compiled my own kernel numerous times but am not
> programming-literate; often I wish there was a howto that explained the
> significance of certain common problems that I seem to have over and
> over again.
which problems
> Haven't found one, tho
Hi folks,
I've compiled my own kernel numerous times but am not
programming-literate; often I wish there was a howto that explained the
significance of certain common problems that I seem to have over and
over again. Haven't found one, though, so thought I'd write my own:
http://wiki.debian.org
Bruno Buys wrote:
Hi Jaime and Simo,
I happen to be more stupid than I previously thought. My mouse is a
serial. I had disabled serial stuff on .config. Now, recompiled and
2.12-5 is working ok with X.
That's actually the first time I try to compile kernels. Funny thing
to do. Do you
Hi Jaime and Simo,
I happen to be more stupid than I previously thought. My mouse is a
serial. I had disabled serial stuff on .config. Now, recompiled and
2.12-5 is working ok with X.
That's actually the first time I try to compile kernels. Funny thing
to do. Do you guys know any liter
I've just had the same problem today. The solution has been, changing:
# CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_PSAUX is not set
to is set
You will have to reboot, and there will be your /dev/psaux again
2005/9/6, Simo Kauppi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,Are you using the legacy device (/dev/psaux) in your XF86Confi
Hi,
Are you using the legacy device (/dev/psaux) in your XF86Config-4? If
so, you need to change it to /dev/input/mice, since you don't have the
/dev/psaux in your kernel.
The section in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 looks something like this:
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Configured Mo
I managed to compile a new 2.6.12 kernel using this howto:
http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/202.
The kernel boots ok and I have a prompt. But X won't start, with error
'no core pointer' or something like that.
I already tried to dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86, but the same error
g
also sprach Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.07.26.0144 +0200]:
> For an explanation of the kernel workings, Martin Krafft's new book, The
> Debian System, might be the place: http://debiansystem.info/about
My book does not talk about "kernel workings" (which would be an
entire book of its
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 06:00:27PM -0500, Josh Battles wrote:
> I'd like to learn how to compile a kernel the Debian way and haven't had that
> much luck finding a faq or walkthrough that explains what I'm doing
> step-by-step and why I'm doing it. I hear that it's easier than the
> "standard way"
On (25/07/05 18:00), Josh Battles wrote:
> I'd like to learn how to compile a kernel the Debian way and haven't had that
> much luck finding a faq or walkthrough that explains what I'm doing
> step-by-step and why I'm doing it. I hear that it's easier than the
> "standard way" and I'd like to find
I'd like to learn how to compile a kernel the Debian way and haven't had that
much luck finding a faq or walkthrough that explains what I'm doing
step-by-step and why I'm doing it. I hear that it's easier than the
"standard way" and I'd like to find out for myself what it's all about.
can someone
Original Message:
-
From: Jule Slootbeek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:32:25 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kernel compile error
Hey all
I'm just trying to install 2.6.9 and am getting this error, i have no
idea why
dolphy:/usr/src/linux# make bzImage
/b
Oct 2004 15:32:25 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: kernel compile error
Hey all
I'm just trying to install 2.6.9 and am getting this error, i have no
idea why
dolphy:/usr/src/linux# make bzImage
/bin/sh: Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string
make: *** [include/linux/version.h]
Hey all
I'm just trying to install 2.6.9 and am getting this error, i have no
idea why
dolphy:/usr/src/linux# make bzImage
/bin/sh: Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string
make: *** [include/linux/version.h] Error 2
the only include/linux/version.h i can find is in /usr/include/linux/
which lo
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 19:06, Grant wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have a laptop P2 300mhz, 128mb ram and a desktop box thats 2ghz,512mb ram.
>
> The question is that could i use my 2ghz machine to make and compile a
> kernel, then package it up into a .deb and send it to the laptop and
> install it and it
Sergio Basurto wrote:
Why you must recompile the kernel?, the current dist
support almost any hardware!!
If you really need to do that:
You must compile the Kernel with the hardware of the
laptop, there is not need to include your desktop
hardware.
kernel-package in woody dist, can help you to achi
Why you must recompile the kernel?, the current dist
support almost any hardware!!
If you really need to do that:
You must compile the Kernel with the hardware of the
laptop, there is not need to include your desktop
hardware.
kernel-package in woody dist, can help you to achive
the .deb package e
Stefan O'Rear wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:06:59AM +0100, Grant wrote:
Hey,
I have a laptop P2 300mhz, 128mb ram and a desktop box thats 2ghz,512mb ram.
The question is that could i use my 2ghz machine to make and compile a
kernel, then package it up into a .deb and send it to the laptop a
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:06:59AM +0100, Grant wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have a laptop P2 300mhz, 128mb ram and a desktop box thats 2ghz,512mb ram.
>
> The question is that could i use my 2ghz machine to make and compile a
> kernel, then package it up into a .deb and send it to the laptop and
> inst
Hey,
I have a laptop P2 300mhz, 128mb ram and a desktop box thats 2ghz,512mb ram.
The question is that could i use my 2ghz machine to make and compile a
kernel, then package it up into a .deb and send it to the laptop and
install it and it work ?
Would i need any extras ? i know i would have to
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 08:40:02AM +, Rus Foster wrote:
> I'm having one of those stupid days..
>
> I'm trying to compile the kernel and am getting
>
> scripts/basic/fixdep.c:97: sys/types.h: No such file or directory
> scripts/basic/fixdep.c:98: sys/stat.h: No such file or directory
> script
>
> try libc6-dev .. that's where I'd expect to find atleast stdio.h and
> string.h
>
> HTH,
> Shaun
Cheers knew it would be something stupid
Rus
--
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] : t: 1-888-327-6330
www.jvds.com - Root on your own box
www.vpscolo.com - Your next hosting company
www.cherryhost
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 08:40 +, Rus Foster wrote:
> I'm having one of those stupid days..
>
> I'm trying to compile the kernel and am getting
>
> scripts/basic/fixdep.c:97: sys/types.h: No such file or directory
> scripts/basic/fixdep.c:98: sys/stat.h: No such file or directory
> scripts/basic
I'm having one of those stupid days..
I'm trying to compile the kernel and am getting
scripts/basic/fixdep.c:97: sys/types.h: No such file or directory
scripts/basic/fixdep.c:98: sys/stat.h: No such file or directory
scripts/basic/fixdep.c:99: sys/mman.h: No such file or directory
scripts/basic/f
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 07:43:01PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:26:04AM +0100, John L Fjellstad wrote:
> > Also, note that 2.6 kernels won't work in Woody unless you have
> > backports of module-init-tools (and probably a couple of other stuff).
>
> ... modutils, if you want t
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:26:04AM +0100, John L Fjellstad wrote:
> Also, note that 2.6 kernels won't work in Woody unless you have
> backports of module-init-tools (and probably a couple of other stuff).
... modutils, if you want to keep the ability to boot earlier kernels.
module-init-tools conf
Miroslav Maiksnar wrote:
cd /usr/src/linux/
make menuconfig
make-kpkg clean
make-kpkg --revision --append_to_version - \
kernel-image
cd ..
It is IMHO better to add option '--config menu' to second make-kpkg
command and do not use `make menuconfig` (it will prevent some warnings
when changing or
Deboo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> VFS: Cannot open root device "" or 03:06
> Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:06
Did you compile in the correct filesystem? (ie ext3, ext2). When you
are using initrd, did you compile in support for initrd *and* ram?
I generally avoid initrd if
1 - 100 of 562 matches
Mail list logo
