On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 10:54:31AM -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
Where's my source tree? How do I get one if I don't have one?
[apt-get|aptitude|whatever] install linux-source-kernelversion
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Thanks man. I was trying to find kernel-source, to no avail.
On 11/5/06, Andrew Sackville-West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 10:54:31AM -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
Where's my source tree? How do I get one if I don't have one?
[apt-get|aptitude|whatever] install linux-source
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:07:55AM -0700, ChadDavis wrote:
Thanks man. I was trying to find kernel-source, to no avail.
at some point in the past few months, the renamed the kernels as there
is now a BSD version of Debian. all linux kernel stuff is now
linux-[image|source|headers|tree
ChadDavis wrote:
Thanks man. I was trying to find kernel-source, to no avail.
That one has caught me out too. Somewhere along the way it changed from
kernel-source-tumptytum to linux-source-tumptytum.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 15:45 +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
On (26/09/06 11:46), Wackojacko wrote:
I run nvidia graphics drivers on my AMD64 3200+, in both 64 bit and 32
bit sid, so they definitely work.
Here's what I do.
~apt-get install module-assistant nvidia-kernel-source
~m
-get install module-assistant nvidia-kernel-source
~m-a prepare (sudo or root)
~m-a a-i nvidia (sudo or root)
~dpkg -i /usr/src/nvidia-kernel-moduleX.deb (sudo or root)
~apt-get install nvidia-glx (sudo or root)
Restart X.
I think this is exactly what I do on Etch
pulse to finish. You
won't die.
Sheesh. Not like this is rocket science.
Ok, it's October 22nd and I still can't get nvidia-kernel-source
off the mirror I'm using. How long do these pulses take?
Here is my sources.list:
andy:/home/hgh# cat /etc/apt/sources.list
deb http
is incompletely
updated. Use another mirror or wait for the mirror pulse to finish. You
won't die.
Sheesh. Not like this is rocket science.
Ok, it's October 22nd and I still can't get nvidia-kernel-source
off the mirror I'm using. How long do these pulses take?
Here is my sources.list
On Sunday 22 October 2006 15:41, Florian Kulzer wrote:
If your package manager lists these packages as upgradable then you
either have not run update in a while or the progeny mirror is
seriously broken or you have found a bug in the package manager.
I had the same problem in Etch a few days
Build ends with:
exec debian/rules DEBIAN_REVISION=2.6.18-davidb-10.00.Custom
APPEND_TO_VERSION=-davidb kernel_image
.config:3217:warning: trying to assign nonexistent symbol SECURITY_SECLVL
debian/ruleset/misc/version_vars.mk:123: *** Error. The version number # #
configuration written to
On Monday 16 October 2006 02:08, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
Robert Baldwin wrote:
i am using debian etch/testing and the mirror us.debian.org
http://us.debian.org. when i try to install nvidia-glx and
nvidia-kernel-source it fails b/c they don't exist here (on the
mirror). however the nvidia
On Sunday 15 October 2006 21:39, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 01:05:39PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
On Sunday 15 October 2006 21:39, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the
On Mon October 16 2006 06:47 am, David Baron wrote:
Yes, they are closed but the drivers are apparently the same. The glx
maybe not. I get much better results with those on Nvidia's site than those
on Sid. I keep the Sid nvidia-kernel-source package around because when
this is upgrades, so
Robert Baldwin wrote:
i am using debian etch/testing and the mirror us.debian.org
http://us.debian.org. when i try to install nvidia-glx and
nvidia-kernel-source it fails b/c they don't exist here (on the
mirror). however the nvidia-glx-legacy and nvidia-kernel-legacy-source
packages
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use another mirror or wait for the mirror pulse to finish. You
On Monday 16 October 2006 01:39, Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use another mirror or wait for the
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use another mirror or wait for the
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:08:15PM -0500, Damon L. Chesser wrote:
So what gives? How can a package NOT exist, but show up as being
upgradeable?
shrug Because the packages file lists it, but the mirror is incompletely
updated. Use another mirror or wait for the
On Sunday 27 August 2006 21:10, Matej Cepl wrote:
Matej Cepl wrote:
zcat patch.bz2 | patch -p1
sorry, this should be bzcat patch.bz2 ...
Neither this nor a CLEAN make-kpkg --added_patch will work because the patch
itself is not compatable with 2.6.17. Will not apply cleanly.
--
To
I am using make-kpkg to build custom kernel. I want to apply the openvz
patch. Placing the command line option --added_patches openvz shows this as a
selected patch but with no indication of it having been applied.
How does one do this correctly?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Baron wrote:
How does one do this correctly?
I don't know how to do it correctly, but in unpacked kernel tree doing
zcat patch.bz2 | patch -p1
would apply the patch. Then run make-kpkg without any --added-patches stuff
and it should work.
Matěj
--
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB
On Sunday 27 August 2006 15:03, Matej Cepl wrote:
David Baron wrote:
How does one do this correctly?
I don't know how to do it correctly, but in unpacked kernel tree doing
zcat patch.bz2 | patch -p1
would apply the patch. Then run make-kpkg without any --added-patches stuff
and it should
Matej Cepl wrote:
zcat patch.bz2 | patch -p1
sorry, this should be bzcat patch.bz2 ...
Matěj
--
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
23 Marion St. #3, (617) 876-1259, ICQ 132822213
He uses statistics as a
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 12:43:08PM +0930, Arthur Marsh wrote:
I've wanted to have the automated tools to work for me, so I backed up
/boot/grub/menu.lst, then read the manual page for update-grub before
running it, observing the differences between the backed-up copy and the
automatically
At 1155222171 past the epoch, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
I'm a little confused why, when I enter:
Hammertime:/home/chuckk/Desktop/kernel/new/linux-2.6.17-mm6#
patch --verbose -p1 ../2.6.17-mm6
the terminal sits idle, apparently indefinitely.
As other(s) have mentioned, you need to add -i or
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I use the symlinks /boot/vmlinuz, /boot/initrd.img, /boot/vmlinuz.old
and /boot/initrd.img.old to point to my current and previous kernels.
These are listed in my menu.lst. Whenever I update the kernel, if
/sbin/update-grub is run, it helpfully replaces those with
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 08:44:29PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I use the symlinks /boot/vmlinuz, /boot/initrd.img, /boot/vmlinuz.old
and /boot/initrd.img.old to point to my current and previous kernels.
These are listed in my menu.lst. Whenever I update the kernel,
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:18:30PM +0930, Arthur Marsh wrote:
The memtest86+ package installs as a grub option, so one doesn't need a
separate boot image on CD to run it.
True, but from a user-friendliness stand point, it is much simpler. I
know that grub always destroys my menu.lst
On 8/10/06, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:26:40PM -0400, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
Unfortunately, Linux has completely frozen up on me four times in a
row while running #make-kpkg. Different patches each time, and
different spots each time. I'll have to
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 01:18:30PM +0930, Arthur Marsh wrote:
The memtest86+ package installs as a grub option, so one doesn't need a
separate boot image on CD to run it.
True, but from a user-friendliness stand point, it is much simpler. I
know that grub always
I have linux-2.6.17, trying to patch it with 2.6.17-mm6,
patch-2.6.17-rt8 from Molnar, and bootsplash-3.1.6-2.6.15.diff.
I'm a little confused why, when I enter:
Hammertime:/home/chuckk/Desktop/kernel/new/linux-2.6.17-mm6# patch
--verbose -p1 ../2.6.17-mm6
the terminal sits idle, apparently
P.S.- #ps -aux in another terminal shows 0.0 for CPU and memory of the
patch operation, if that matters.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:02:51PM -0400, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
I have linux-2.6.17, trying to patch it with 2.6.17-mm6,
patch-2.6.17-rt8 from Molnar, and bootsplash-3.1.6-2.6.15.diff.
I'm a little confused why, when I enter:
Hammertime:/home/chuckk/Desktop/kernel/new/linux-2.6.17-mm6# patch
On 8/10/06, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:02:51PM -0400, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
I have linux-2.6.17, trying to patch it with 2.6.17-mm6,
patch-2.6.17-rt8 from Molnar, and bootsplash-3.1.6-2.6.15.diff.
I'm a little confused why, when I enter:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:47:42PM -0400, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
Cool, thank you.
BTW, I know it must seem like the most obvious thing in the world, but
the more I google and search Debian help, the less answers I find...
what do you do when applying two patches tells you:
Reversed (or
On 8/10/06, Roberto C. Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 03:47:42PM -0400, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
Cool, thank you.
BTW, I know it must seem like the most obvious thing in the world, but
the more I google and search Debian help, the less answers I find...
what do you do
Unfortunately, Linux has completely frozen up on me four times in a
row while running #make-kpkg. Different patches each time, and
different spots each time. I'll have to figure this out when I don't
have deadlines. Sadly, I think it's WinXP for now.
Thanks for your help.
-Chuckk
On 8/10/06,
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:26:40PM -0400, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
Unfortunately, Linux has completely frozen up on me four times in a
row while running #make-kpkg. Different patches each time, and
different spots each time. I'll have to figure this out when I don't
have deadlines. Sadly, I
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 10:26:40PM -0400, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
Unfortunately, Linux has completely frozen up on me four times in a
row while running #make-kpkg. Different patches each time, and
different spots each time. I'll have to figure this out when I don't
i am using debian etch/testing and the mirror us.debian.org. when i try to install nvidia-glx and nvidia-kernel-source it fails b/c they don't exist here (on the mirror). however the nvidia-glx-legacy and nvidia-kernel-legacy-source packages are there. when i viewed this mirror with firefox, sarge
Adam D wrote:
snip
all give me this error:
HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/mconf.o
scripts/kconfig/mconf.c: In function 'exec_conf':
scripts/kconfig/mconf.c:488: error: 'EINTR' undeclared (first use in this
function) scripts/kconfig/mconf.c:488: error: (Each undeclared identifier
is reported
Data:
working kernel: Linux version 2.6.16.14.amd64-ws1.1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc
version 4.0.3 (Ubuntu 4.0.3-1ubuntu5)) #1 Thu Jun 1 23:55:33 PDT 2006
(self compiled and works)
new kernel: linux-2.6.17.1
errors both occur with both linux-2.6.16.14 and linux-2.6.17.1
So I am gathering it
apt-get install kernel-headers-x.x.x
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El Miércoles, 24 de Mayo de 2006 14:01, Liam O'Toole escribió:
Hi!
Please pardon the stupid question...but...I am trying to install a
piece of software on my Debian test machine and the setup is failing
with a Kernel source error while attempting to build some sort of
module. The vendor
Hi!
Please pardon the stupid question...but...I am trying to install a piece of software on my Debian test machine and the setup is failing with a Kernel source error while attempting to build some sort of module. The vendor is recommending "you should install kernel-sources for 2.4.27-
On Wed, 24 May 2006 12:05:48 -0400
Dov Oxenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Please pardon the stupid question...but...I am trying to install a
piece of software on my Debian test machine and the setup is failing
with a Kernel source error while attempting to build some sort of
module
instala o kernel padrao i386 mesmo
depois, em cada máquina você instala o kernel que você quiser
apt-get install linux-image-2.6-k7
por exemplo
--
Henrique G. Abreu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Olá pessoal,
Tenho o debian ccd instalado na empresa e aqui em casa,
gostaria de instalar o kernel source 6.-k7, mas o pc na empresa(que tem
internet) é um Intele o meu um duron é por isso que no synaptic não lista
esse kernel source 6.-k7 ???
Ola pessoal estou querendo baixar o kernel-source do debian mas a
versão 2.6.16 mas não encontro em lugar nenhum! Alguém saberia onde
posso encontrar
Aguardo e agradeço desde já!
Abraços
Em Segunda 17 Abril 2006 17:47, LITLE TUX escreveu:
Ola pessoal estou querendo baixar o kernel-source do debian mas a versão
2.6.16 mas não encontro em lugar nenhum! Alguém saberia onde posso
encontrar
Aguardo e agradeço desde já!
Abraços
Seria?
aptitude search tree | grep 6.16
p
Cê tem que adicionar uma fonte deb-src no seu sources.list.
Depois que adicionei ele apareceu aqui pra mim:
frank:/home/bruno# apt-get install kernel-source
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Package kernel-source is a virtual package provided by:
kernel-source
,
from include/linux/module.h:10,
from /home/kloro/linux/madwifi-ng/ath_hal/ah_osdep.c:46:
include/asm/processor.h:87: error: array type has incomplete element
type
At this point, the compiler is not dealing with madwifi stuff per se, but with
kernel source
type
At this point, the compiler is not dealing with madwifi stuff per se, but
with
kernel source. Specifically, to the best of my research, an array variable
(object in the new parlance) needs to be declared somewhere in the .c files.
How can this be? Lots of people use the kernel code
Boa tarde.
Gostaria de saber se o sid está com problema em relação ao driver da
nvidia com o kernel 2.6.16. Não consigo compilar aqui...
Abraços...
rodrigo
NVIDIA: calling KBUILD...
make CC=gcc-4.0 -C /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.16
SUBDIRS=/usr/src/modules/nvidia-kernel/nv modules
make[4]:
Em Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:37:14 -0300 rodrigo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
disse que:
Eu tenho tido o mesmo problema há semanas... Aparentemente o núcleo novo
(e já desde o 16-rc1) mudou a estrutura que lida com alguma coisa
gráfica e o código da NVidia não foi atualizado. O erro mesmo é esse aí:
'struct
OpenGL install prefix : /usr
compat32 install prefix : (not specified)
installer install prefix: /usr
utility install prefix : /usr
kernel name : (not specified)
kernel include path : (not specified)
kernel source path : (not specified)
kernel output path
remchp wrote:
Bonjour, tous, je vien de compiler un noyau 2.6.16. Et voulant compiler
le module nvidia j'ai eu des erreurs de compilation, j'ai essayer aussi
avec l'installeur nvidia, même soucis :-(.
Je met le log defois que quelqu'un a eu ce soucis la et connaisse une
soluce.
Voir ce
J'ai repackagé la version NVidia 8178 des drivers nvidia (j'ai l'impression
de me répeter) elle est disponible au téléchargement sur
http://hypercube.dynalias.org ainsi que le patch pour ceux qui
souhaiteraient repackagé la version debian
Laurent CARON writes:
remchp wrote:
Bonjour, tous, je
: /usr/X11R6
OpenGL install prefix : /usr
compat32 install prefix : (not specified)
installer install prefix: /usr
utility install prefix : /usr
kernel name : (not specified)
kernel include path : (not specified)
kernel source path : (not specified
Il faut rendre à césar ce qui est à césar, je n'ai pas créé le patch,
j'ai simplement suivi un tuto pour repackager le drivers avec le patch.
c'est tout ce que je voulais dire... ;)
J'ai repackagé la version NVidia 8178 des drivers nvidia (j'ai
l'impression
de me répeter) elle est
Le Mardi 14 Mars 2006 03:21, Frédéric Bothamy a écrit :
* Claude Reveret [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-13 15:58] :
Le Lundi 13 Mars 2006 15:45, Claude Reveret a écrit :
Bonjour la liste,
J'essaye d'installer le pilote nvidia selon
document /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source
Le Mardi 14 Mars 2006 08:03, ceroi remo a écrit :
Frédéric Bothamy a écrit :
Fred
Bonjour ,
J'utilise le mme noyau et tout est OK
Vois la doc suivante et plus particulierement la partie sur les noyaux
sup à 2.6.14
http://www.coagul.org/article.php3?id_article=346
Merci pour la doc,
Bonjour la liste,
J'essaye d'installer le pilote nvidia selon
document /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/README.Debian
méthode 2
mais :
make-kpkg modules_image
The modules_* targets should be called from a fully configured source tree,
and one where at least make-kpkg debian has been run
Le Lundi 13 Mars 2006 15:45, Claude Reveret a écrit :
Bonjour la liste,
J'essaye d'installer le pilote nvidia selon
document /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/README.Debian
méthode 2
mais :
make-kpkg modules_image
The modules_* targets should be called from a fully configured source
Le Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:45:06 +0100
Claude Reveret [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
Bonjour la liste,
J'essaye d'installer le pilote nvidia selon
document /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/README.Debian
méthode 2
mais :
make-kpkg modules_image
The modules_* targets should be called
* Claude Reveret [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-13 15:58] :
Le Lundi 13 Mars 2006 15:45, Claude Reveret a écrit :
Bonjour la liste,
J'essaye d'installer le pilote nvidia selon
document /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/README.Debian
méthode 2
mais :
make-kpkg modules_image
Frédéric Bothamy a écrit :
* Claude Reveret [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-13 15:58] :
Le Lundi 13 Mars 2006 15:45, Claude Reveret a écrit :
Bonjour la liste,
J'essaye d'installer le pilote nvidia selon
document /usr/share/doc/nvidia-kernel-source/README.Debian
méthode 2
mais :
make
Hiya LV,
I have been using 2.6.15 for about a week now. It's fantastic. Seems to
be faster than 2.6.8. I have scanning, sound, USB, cd burning, rsync,
nfs. All works well. I used the kernel from kernel.org. I didn't bother
with the ramdisk. Seems to be a waste of time.
I followed the
and kernel-source is in
/usr/src/linux-2.6.15.4
and kernel headers in /usr/src/kernel-headers-2.6.15.4.20060301 and
ndiswrapper source in /usr/src/modules/ndiswrapper.
How should I proceed to compile ndiswrapper module?
Further if anybody can throw somelight why kernel compiled from u
nstable source
Tom Rauchenwald schrieb am Montag, 27. Februar 2006 22:44:
Nun ist mir aufgefallen, das dort als letzte Version immer noch
kernel-source-2.6.11
aktuell ist.
Heißt inzwischen linux-source-blabla, genauso wie die Kernel-Pakete
inzwischen linux-image-foobar heißen.
DANKE!
Tom
--
bis
I was using sid kernel source from my sid partition. When I was
running sarge, I untarred sid kernel source 2.6.15 in /usr/src. Added
bootsplash patch did oldconfig using sarge's config file from
/boot/.and answered mostly all to defaults. I thought 2.6.15 will take
only linux-image, I tried make
Hallo
hier läuft debian sid
aus bestimmten Gründen habe ich den Kernel selber aus einem kernel-source
Paket erstellt.
Nun ist mir aufgefallen, das dort als letzte Version immer noch
kernel-source-2.6.11
aktuell ist.
Installiert man aber kernel-image-2.6-686 wird eine .15 Version
installiert
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:01:19 +0100
Jörg Arlandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo
hier läuft debian sid
aus bestimmten Gründen habe ich den Kernel selber aus einem kernel-source
Paket erstellt.
Nun ist mir aufgefallen, das dort als letzte Version immer noch
kernel-source-2.6.11
aktuell
Chris Howie wrote:
[snipped...]
# apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r) module-assistant
# m-a a-i nvidia
# apt-get install nvidia-glx nvidia-settings
# modprobe nvidia
# echo nvidia /etc/modules
# dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
Just in case anyone else has to go through this there's a
to
install the kernel source, but I can't find a package for it? Am I
missing something here, or can I not download the 2.6.x kernel source
via apt...?
Thanks,
--
bob [at] bobarnott [dot] com http://www.bobarnott.com
of expected. I downloaded the latest NVidia Linux drivers, but
they wouldn't install, something about no pre-comiled kernel headers
and no source for my 2.4.x kernel.
You don't need pre-compiled headers or the kernel source. You need the headers.
As I didn't have much on the machine I decided
Chris Howie wrote:
[snipped...]
Again, you only need the headers.
# apt-get install linux-headers-$(uname -r) module-assistant
# m-a a-i nvidia
# apt-get install nvidia-glx nvidia-settings
# modprobe nvidia
# echo nvidia /etc/modules
# dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
Thanks for the info, as
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 10:38 +, Bob wrote:
...So I decided to
install the kernel source, but I can't find a package for it? Am I
missing something here, or can I not download the 2.6.x kernel source
via apt...?
On sid, the packages are now called linux-source-2.6.x rather than
kernel
Bob wrote:
Thanks for the info, as you can see I'm pretty clueless about this kind
of thing. I take it the m-a a-i bit is something to do with this
module-assistant package...?
Yeah, m-a a-i = module-assistant auto-install or something like that.
Do I need to install the NVidia drivers after
Chris Howie wrote:
Bob wrote:
Thanks for the info, as you can see I'm pretty clueless about this kind
of thing. I take it the m-a a-i bit is something to do with this
module-assistant package...?
Yeah, m-a a-i = module-assistant auto-install or something like that.
Do I need to install the
Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 10:38 +, Bob wrote:
...So I decided to
install the kernel source, but I can't find a package for it? Am I
missing something here, or can I not download the 2.6.x kernel source
via apt...?
On sid, the packages are now called linux-source-2.6.x
com o kenrel source .tar.bz2 no /usr/src basta voce descompactar
tar -xjvf kernel-source-2.4.27.tar.bz2
o kernel-headers, são os cabeçalhos do kernel, ele pode ser usado por
exemplo, quando voce vai compilar um driver ou um modulo, então inves de
baixar o kernel-source, voce baixa o kernel
pra instalar o kernel source eu fiz apt-get install
kernel-source-2.4.27 ai instalou.
mas não só apareceu um arquivo .tar.bz2 em /usr/src/.
mas acho q num instalou.
o que faço pra instalar o código do kernel completo.
eu tb instalei o kernel-headers (não sei pra q server, mas instalei),
mas esse
:
On 12/22/05, Fred Proctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have installed Debian Testing via the netinstall, and have a kernel
2.6.12-1-386 from Debian testing (etch). I'd like to make some changes
to the kernel source, namely the device driver for my sound chip. I
installed what I thought
Fred Proctor wrote:
I still don't know how to build a kernel from source identitical to the
kernel binary provided with the Debian netinstall. If anyone knows how
to do that, please let me know.
--Fred
I'm still fairly new to linux but here's what I do. I dont use initrd's
now and
bonjour, j'essais d'installer une tablette graphique wacom
- j'ai du mettre à jour mon noyau : 2.6.8-1-386 vers 2.6.12-1-686 (pIII).
- j'ai aptgetté linux-headers-2.6.12-1-686 (pâs eu de liens /usr/src/linux
fait en auto, ln fait à la main)
et lors de l'install du wacom-kernel-source, j'ai un
Le Jeudi 29 Décembre 2005 15:19, Bulot Grégory a écrit :
oops mail partit trop vite, j'ai aussi tenté cela :
dpkg-reconfigure wacom-kernel-source
/usr/sbin/dpkg-reconfigure: wacom-kernel-source est cassé ou partiellement
installé
... Fait
wacom-kernel-source est déjà la plus récente version disponible.
0 mis à jour, 0 nouvellement installés, 0 à enlever et 361 non mis à jour.
1 partiellement installés ou enlevés.
Il est nécessaire de prendre 0o dans les archives.
Après dépaquetage, 0o d'espace disque supplémentaires seront utilisés
Package: wacom-kernel-source
Version: 0.6.6-8
kernel: 2.6.12-1-686
debian/etch
# dpkg --list apt wacom-kernel-source
Souhait=inconnU/Installé/suppRimé/Purgé/H=à garder
| État=Non/Installé/fichier-Config/dépaqUeté/échec-conFig/H=semi-installé
|/ Err?=(aucune)/H=à garder/besoin Réinstallation/X
Le 29.12.2005 17:21:20, Bulot Grégory a écrit :
Package: wacom-kernel-source
Version: 0.6.6-8
kernel: 2.6.12-1-686
debian/etch
Je crois qu'il ne faut pas trop se fatiguer avec ce paquet.
Il est d'une part obsolète, la version linuxwacom actuelle est 0.7.2.
Et il n'y a pas d'entente entre le
acheté la tablette, je suis bloqué à ça :
(après avoir lancé le ./configure)
checking for linux-based kernel... yes
checking for kernel sources... not found
***
*** WARNING:
*** Unable to guess kernel source directory
*** Looked at /usr/src/linux
*** Looked at /usr/src/linux-2.6.12-1-686
Le Jeudi 29 Décembre 2005 18:12, Bulot Grégory a écrit :
ok, j'y suis jamais arrivé (manque de concentration de ma part), en fait
depuis que j'ai acheté la tablette, je suis bloqué à ça :
je corrige, avec la magie du apt-get -s , le kernel-source n'était jamais
installé (et pour cause
Le 29.12.2005 18:24:01, Bulot Grégory a écrit :
Le Jeudi 29 Décembre 2005 18:12, Bulot Grégory a écrit :
ok, j'y suis jamais arrivé (manque de concentration de ma part), en
fait
depuis que j'ai acheté la tablette, je suis bloqué à ça :
je corrige, avec la magie du apt-get -s , le kernel
, le kernel-source n'était
jamais installé (et pour cause), mais les erreurs persistent toujours à peu
près aux mêmes endroits
note j'ai installé les sources : apt-get -s
gr, j'suis un peu maladroit, décidement
apt-get install linux-source-2.6.12
cd /usr/src
bunzip2 linux-source-2.6.12
config.h
config.status: config.h is unchanged
config.status: executing depfiles commands
BUILD ENVIRONMENT:
architecture - i686
linux kernel - yes 2.4
module versioning - no
kernel source - no
Xorg SDK - no /root/wacom
config.status: config.h is unchanged
config.status: executing depfiles commands
BUILD ENVIRONMENT:
architecture - i686
linux kernel - yes 2.4
module versioning - no
kernel source - no
Xorg SDK - no /root/wacom/linuxwacom-0.7.2
Le Jeudi 29 Décembre 2005 20:27, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) a écrit :
Le 29.12.2005 18:55:12, Bulot Grégory a écrit :
Le Jeudi 29 Décembre 2005 18:29, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) a écrit :
C'est juste un warning. wacom_drv.o appartient à xserver-xorg, il se
trouve dans
I have installed Debian Testing via the netinstall, and have a kernel
2.6.12-1-386 from Debian testing (etch). I'd like to make some changes
to the kernel source, namely the device driver for my sound chip. I
installed what I thought was the kernel source, and expected to see
-1-386
101 - 200 of 1089 matches
Mail list logo
