Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-11 Thread Richard Hoskins
Bijan Soleymani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't like Microsoft because they make proprietary software, not > because their proprietary software isn't good enough. For most > people in most situations it's good enough. If you don't believe me > look around. I don't have to look further than

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-11 Thread Bijan Soleymani
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 03:22:14PM -0700, s. keeling wrote: > I blame Microsoft directly for having created an environment in which > malware thrives. The virus and worm writers are merely supplying the > payload that exploits that environment. And we all end up paying for > the mess everytime so

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-10 Thread Mike M
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:22:08PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:25:33AM -0500, Mike M wrote: > > > What interests me at this point is if and when there will be a live-cd > > == Debian (stable, testing, unstable) > > When it's time to railroad, people start railroading.

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-10 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Sam Halliday: > > i cant believe i just replied to an anti-microsoft troll on debian-user Rest assured, you didn't. On my more reasonable days, I can agree that there may actually be a small number of situations where someone will have no alternative to using crapware. Poor bastar

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-10 Thread Pedro M.
Katipo wrote: On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 23:04:57 -0500 Jeff Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sunday 08 February 2004 7:18 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 02:16:33PM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote: I just have to say that I find this cluebie/stupid nonsense you keep spo

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-10 Thread Adam Funk
On Monday 09 February 2004 23:10, Paul Morgan wrote: > The point being that if you install debian, and ask questions which > show that you're thinking and trying to learn, debian folks will bend > over backwards and stay up all night helping you out, for free. There > are many in here who will att

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Sam Halliday
Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 12:29:35AM +, Sam Halliday wrote: > > varicad is a joke for serious work... speak to an expert, and they > > will tell you the same thing. even autocad is described as "too > > simplistic" by a few mechanical engineers i know, and architects >

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 12:29:35AM +, Sam Halliday wrote: > varicad is a joke for serious work... speak to an expert, and they will > tell you the same thing. even autocad is described as "too simplistic" > by a few mechanical engineers i know, and architects (REAL architects, > not "extension

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Sam Halliday
Nate Duehr wrote: > While you may be very intelligent regarding CAD software, you sure > seem willing to attack people like myself who are only pointing out > alternatives that ARE Linux-related on a Linux mailing list, and then > claiming that *I* took the conversation off-topic? Wow. Quite bo

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Marc Wilson
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:25:33AM -0500, Mike M wrote: > I think live-cds demonstrate the easy-to-install GPOS are feasible. No one said they weren't feasable. The installation isn't the issue. The *maintenance* of it is. Put another way... we already have umpteen zillion poorly-administered

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Marc Wilson
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:04:17AM -0500, Mike M wrote: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 11:04:57PM -0500, Jeff Elkins wrote: > > On Sunday 08 February 2004 7:18 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: > > > > > > > Then they should use it. I couldn't care less whether someone uses Debian, > > > Knoppix, SuSE, Mandrake,

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Nate Duehr
On Feb 9, 2004, at 5:29 PM, Sam Halliday wrote: now please can we stop this thread and get back to debian related issues? This from the person who took the time to answer the original poster's anti-Microsoft comments with non-Linux/non-Debian advocacy on a Linux list??? You started it, sir. I j

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Damon L. Chesser
Nate Duehr wrote: On Feb 9, 2004, at 2:25 PM, Damon L. Chesser wrote: This is the first time I have to disagree with you S. Keeling. Users of CAD (espe. AutoCad) realy have to use windose. No maker of professional CAD is porting to linux. I know a shop here that builds buildings and they a

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Sam Halliday
Nate Duehr wrote: > Damon Chesser wrote: > > This is the first time I have to disagree with you S. Keeling. > > Users of CAD (espe. AutoCad) realy have to use windose. No maker > > of professional CAD is porting to linux. I know a shop here that > > builds buildings and they all use Autocad. T

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Greg Folkert
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 16:25, Damon L. Chesser wrote: > s. keeling wrote: > >Incoming from Paul Morgan: > >>You must also be referring to the almost constant stream of infantile anti > >>"M$" remarks with which I am heartily sick and tired. I use several OSes, > > > >This is an attitude of which _I

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Nate Duehr
On Feb 9, 2004, at 2:25 PM, Damon L. Chesser wrote: This is the first time I have to disagree with you S. Keeling. Users of CAD (espe. AutoCad) realy have to use windose. No maker of professional CAD is porting to linux. I know a shop here that builds buildings and they all use Autocad. The

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Paul Morgan
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 07:43:41 +0800, Katipo wrote: > On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:59:43 -0500 > Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 13:50:17 -0700, s. keeling wrote: >> >> > Incoming from Paul Morgan: >> >> >> >> You must also be referring to the almost constant stream of >

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Katipo
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:59:43 -0500 Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 13:50:17 -0700, s. keeling wrote: > > > Incoming from Paul Morgan: > >> > >> You must also be referring to the almost constant stream of > >infantile anti> "M$" remarks with which I am heartily sick a

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Katipo
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:25:17 -0600 "Damon L. Chesser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > s. keeling wrote: > > >Incoming from Paul Morgan: > > > > > This is the first time I have to disagree with you S. Keeling. Users > of CAD (espe. AutoCad) realy have to use windose. No maker of > professional

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Paul Morgan
On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 21:04:34 -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: [snip] > > If the idea is to dumb things down so that the stupids don't have to think, > eventually all that will be left are the stupids. > [snip] Ha! "Build a system that even a fool can use, and only a fool will want to use it." I've j

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Paul Morgan
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 21:11:15 +, Sam Halliday wrote: > > i cant believe i just replied to an anti-microsoft troll on debian-user > :-/ > I'll note it in my diary, Sam :> -- paul It is important to realize that any lock can be picked with a big enough hammer.

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Damon L. Chesser
s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Paul Morgan: You must also be referring to the almost constant stream of infantile anti "M$" remarks with which I am heartily sick and tired. I use several OSes, This is an attitude of which _I_ am sick and tired. Microsoft software sucks, bigtime! Anyone

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Paul Morgan
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 13:50:17 -0700, s. keeling wrote: > Incoming from Paul Morgan: >> >> You must also be referring to the almost constant stream of infantile anti >> "M$" remarks with which I am heartily sick and tired. I use several OSes, > > This is an attitude of which _I_ am sick and tired

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Sam Halliday
s. keeling wrote: > Incoming from Paul Morgan: > > You must also be referring to the almost constant stream of > > infantile anti"M$" remarks with which I am heartily sick and tired. > > I use several OSes, > This is an attitude of which _I_ am sick and tired. Microsoft > software sucks, bigtime!

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Paul Morgan: > > You must also be referring to the almost constant stream of infantile anti > "M$" remarks with which I am heartily sick and tired. I use several OSes, This is an attitude of which _I_ am sick and tired. Microsoft software sucks, bigtime! Anyone looking at the amo

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Paul Morgan
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 16:33:15 +0800, Katipo wrote: > > How much further ahead would Debian be if it already incorporated > Knoppixs' hardware recognition, Adamantixs' security features and > Xandros' drag and drop capability? Instead I have sat back and watched > as supposedly mature aged individu

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Mike M
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:13:07PM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 06:32:54PM -0800, Dale Welch wrote: > > > For him and many other people having an easy install OS is imperative. > > No. John Q. Public has no business pretending he's competent to install a > complex operatin

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Mike M
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:05:15PM -0800, Dale Welch wrote: > I would like at some point to build a version based on > stable. Perhaps late this year after my 2nd brain surgery :-) I've subscribed to a brain surgery user list. I can do your surgery and then you can get started on the stable-ba

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Mike M
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 11:04:57PM -0500, Jeff Elkins wrote: > On Sunday 08 February 2004 7:18 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: > > > > Then they should use it. I couldn't care less whether someone uses Debian, > > Knoppix, SuSE, Mandrake, or even Windows. Cluebies have been shooting > > themselves in the

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Greg Folkert
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 08:06, Haines Brown wrote: > > Dale Welch wrote: > > > > >And i was probably building computers when your mama was changing > > >your diapers . . . > > > > > > > > To whom does "your" refer? If to Kent, then "Nope." > > > > >after all i was born a few months after Kennedy

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Adam Aube
On Monday 09 February 2004 02:50 am, Katipo wrote: > Yes, I read that article. I'm afraid that I don't place much credence > in the reviewers' assessment ability. To quote the author from the final article in the series: "Another thing for certain: just looking at the score doesn't begin to do j

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Haines Brown
> Dale Welch wrote: > > >And i was probably building computers when your mama was changing > >your diapers . . . > > > > > To whom does "your" refer? If to Kent, then "Nope." > > >after all i was born a few months after Kennedy was shot... > > > > > Kent was born a few months before Kennedy w

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Katipo
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 23:04:57 -0500 Jeff Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 08 February 2004 7:18 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 02:16:33PM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote: > I just have to say that I find this cluebie/stupid nonsense you keep > spouting very offputting

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-09 Thread Katipo
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 16:58:48 -0500 Adam Aube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 08 February 2004 03:19 pm, Sneferu wrote: > > I'd say that the solutions to all this problems is mepis.org ;-) > > Agreed - MEPIS is the Linux distro I would recommend to a newbie. > > In a "Spawn of Debian" faceo

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Nate Duehr
On Feb 8, 2004, at 9:04 PM, Jeff Elkins wrote: Cut out the "stupid/cluebie" nonsense. You hurt Debian, Linux, and OSS in general with this elitist attitude. What's to "hurt"? In the purest sense, F/OSS software is still F/OSS software at the end of the day. Whether or not anyone cares to use i

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Lance Simmons
* Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040208 22:13]: > > I call people stupid when they ARE. For the sake of your social life, I sure hope you meant "only when". -- Lance Simmons signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 11:04:57PM -0500, Jeff Elkins wrote: > On Sunday 08 February 2004 7:18 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: > I just have to say that I find this cluebie/stupid nonsense you keep spouting > very offputting and childish. Then take steps to ensure that they're NOT cluebies, instead of fac

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Monique Y. Herman
On 2004-02-09, Nano Nano penned: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:05:15PM -0800, Dale Welch wrote: >> >> ---dale ---it is ok to have no rules... so long as everyone follows >> the rules > > Evey asks: "All this riot and uproar, V...is this anarchy? Is this the > land of do-as-you-please?" He responds

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Jeff Elkins
On Sunday 08 February 2004 11:13 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: > Well, let's see. I was born in 1964. I've been doing computers since 1980 > or so. The first machine I owned was an 8080A-based machine called an > Interact-1 that used an integrated tape drive and an absolutely horrid > chicklet keyboar

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 06:32:54PM -0800, Dale Welch wrote: > And i was probably building computers when your mama was changing your > diapers... Well, let's see. I was born in 1964. I've been doing computers since 1980 or so. The first machine I owned was an 8080A-based machine called an Inte

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Nano Nano
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:05:15PM -0800, Dale Welch wrote: > > ---dale > ---it is ok to have no rules... >so long as everyone follows the rules Evey asks: "All this riot and uproar, V...is this anarchy? Is this the land of do-as-you-please?" He responds: "No. This is only the land of take

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Jeff Elkins
On Sunday 08 February 2004 7:18 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 02:16:33PM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote: > > Well a lot of new users like Knoppix and would like to have it on > > the hard disk. Is it ok for them to use it, or will the secret police > > come and shoot them for not u

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Dale Welch
I apologize to my elder... it was not to you though i realize i quoted you. :-) It was to Marc i spoke and perhaps others... that particular attitude while strong in my generation... is even stronger in a younger crowd. ;-) But perhaps marc has fooled me and is older than either of us. But hey

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Kent West
Dale Welch wrote: And i was probably building computers when your mama was changing your diapers . . . To whom does "your" refer? If to Kent, then "Nope." after all i was born a few months after Kennedy was shot... Kent was born a few months before Kennedy was shot. -- Kent -- To UNSUBSC

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Dale Welch
And i was probably building computers when your mama was changing your diapers... since i learned basic on a trash-80 model-1 when i was barely a teenager (ok so some would say i am just as bad calling the trs-80 by the popular term of trash-80 --- i knew some guys who ran a good bbs on a trs-80

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Paul Morgan
tall knoppix, that's fine, it's a free country (well it is here anyway), go ahead and do it. But, be aware that knoppix is not debian (repeat: *knoppix* *is* *not* *debian*), so, if you're using a knoppix distro, a considerate practice would be to post to the knoppix mailing list(s). --

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 02:16:33PM -0500, Bijan Soleymani wrote: > Well a lot of new users like Knoppix and would like to have it on > the hard disk. Is it ok for them to use it, or will the secret police > come and shoot them for not using pure Debian instead too. Then they should use it. I coul

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Adam Aube
On Sunday 08 February 2004 03:19 pm, Sneferu wrote: > I'd say that the solutions to all this problems is mepis.org ;-) Agreed - MEPIS is the Linux distro I would recommend to a newbie. In a "Spawn of Debian" faceoff, it beat Lindows, Xandros, and Libranet. http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=04/

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Lance Simmons
* Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040208 10:44]: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 10:15:38AM -0600, Lance Simmons wrote: > > When an old laptop falls into your hands, and you don't have any > > documentation on it, it's easier to use Knoppix and then upgrade to > > Debian than it is to do the work needed

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Sneferu
I'd say that the solutions to all this problems is mepis.org ;-) Can still be used as livecd, and if you like what you see just double click pe Install icon on the desktop... I don't think that a debian-like-system can be any easy than this...my 13 years old cousin got it up-n-working in less t

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Bijan Soleymani
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:40:33PM +0100, Andreas Janssen wrote: > Using Knoppix on the hard disk means no security updates, a system only > upgradable to unstable, and a lot of possible problems for beginners. It all depends on what kind of beginner. When I was new to Debian my major problems wer

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello Bijan Soleymani (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:44:28AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: >> Feh. While it may well work for you, who has clue, anyone who >> suggests to a cluebie that using Knoppix is a way to get Debian >> should be shot. > > Well a lot of new users li

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Bijan Soleymani
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 08:44:28AM -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > Feh. While it may well work for you, who has clue, anyone who suggests to > a cluebie that using Knoppix is a way to get Debian should be shot. Well a lot of new users like Knoppix and would like to have it on the hard disk. Is it ok

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 10:15:38AM -0600, Lance Simmons wrote: > When an old laptop falls into your hands, and you don't have any > documentation on it, it's easier to use Knoppix and then upgrade to > Debian than it is to do the work needed to install Debian directly. So > long as the end result

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-08 Thread Lance Simmons
* Paul E Condon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040207 18:05]: > > I think there is a place for Knoppix in introducing newbies to Debian. I'm not a Debian newbie, but in the past year I've used Knoppix for new installs on a few pieces of unfamiliar hardware. When an old laptop falls into your hands, and yo

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-07 Thread Erik Steffl
Marc Wilson wrote: On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 10:28:03PM +0100, David Baron wrote: Once you do the HD installation, you have their, allbeit mixed, distro based on Debian and KDE. Ok, now... we've got a stupid who couldn't figure out how to read well enough to run the Debian installer. You thus pr

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-07 Thread Brad Sims
On Saturday 07 February 2004 6:05 pm, Paul E Condon wrote: > I think there is a place for Knoppix in introducing newbies to Debian. > You suggest to them that they pop the Knoppix CD into the CD drive, and > try to boot from it. Tell them that if Knoppix boots from the CD they > really should be ab

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-07 Thread Paul E Condon
On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 05:12:28PM -0600, Kent West wrote: > Marc Wilson wrote: > > >There's no reason why he should be installing operating > >systems, either, any more than he should be building cars. Or performing > >brain surgery. Contrary to popular belief, there ARE some things that Joe >

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-07 Thread Kent West
Marc Wilson wrote: There's no reason why he should be installing operating systems, either, any more than he should be building cars. Or performing brain surgery. Contrary to popular belief, there ARE some things that Joe Stupid has no business doing. Installing an OS or building a car aren't

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-07 Thread Marc Wilson
On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 10:28:03PM +0100, David Baron wrote: > Once you do the HD installation, you have their, allbeit mixed, distro based > on Debian and KDE. Ok, now... we've got a stupid who couldn't figure out how to read well enough to run the Debian installer. You thus propose to him that

Re: Knoppix is Not Debian

2004-02-07 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > mailing list becomes the best source of advice. Knoppsters on their mailing > list will tell you this as well. > well! as Knoppix users are called Knoppsters (as you say), what do we call debian users ? Debianiac ? rrs -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE--