On 07/26/2005 08:36 pm, Dick Davies wrote:
Maybe I've got completely the wrong end of the stick and if so I apologize,
but if someone asked me how to edit word docs in linux and i said 'vi', I'd
be being an ass (which is of course my right as a member of the human race,
but I wouldn't
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 21:54 -0400, Michael Z Daryabeygi wrote:
Anders Breindahl wrote:
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 02:19, Rajiv Vyas wrote:
[snip]
try looking in the archives for the reply-to question. We only just
went around on this. Just reply-all and delete the sender.
Is T-bird so
Ron Johnson wrote:
Is T-bird so primitive that it doesn't have Reply-to-List?
Yes.
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unfortunately taskjuggler isn't packaged as a .deb because I would be
interested in having a look at it. It seems there was a shot at packaging it
a while ago but it's not been touched in an age. Might have a go at compiling
unless someone knows of a .deb source.
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 05:37,
On Tuesday 26 Jul 2005 15:13, Graham Smith wrote:
Unfortunately taskjuggler isn't packaged as a .deb because I would be
interested in having a look at it. It seems there was a shot at packaging
it a while ago but it's not been touched in an age. Might have a go at
compiling unless someone
Hal Vaughan said:
We can use whatever excuse we want, but I've found that the way clueless
newbies are treated on this list is just plain rotten. There are polite ways
to say RTFM, but it seems to many are in a hurry to shout RTFMA and excuse
themselves as just trying to tell them what to do
Josh Battles writes:
Another list I'm on is *brutal* about that. If you pose a newbie question,
the responses you get (if you're lucky enough to get a response) are either
RTFM or check the archives. This list isn't all that bad in comparison.
It really isn't, but we are all newbies
* Josh Battles [EMAIL PROTECTED] [0705 16:05]:
Hal Vaughan said:
We can use whatever excuse we want, but I've found that the way clueless
newbies are treated on this list is just plain rotten. There are polite
ways
to say RTFM, but it seems to many are in a hurry to shout RTFMA and
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 11:04 am, Josh Battles wrote:
Hal Vaughan said:
We can use whatever excuse we want, but I've found that the way clueless
newbies are treated on this list is just plain rotten. There are polite
ways to say RTFM, but it seems to many are in a hurry to shout RTFMA and
Hal Vaughan said:
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 11:04 am, Josh Battles wrote:
Hal Vaughan said:
We can use whatever excuse we want, but I've found that the way clueless
newbies are treated on this list is just plain rotten. There are polite
ways to say RTFM, but it seems to many are in a hurry
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 17:46, Dick Davies wrote:
The OP asked 'how do I read MS Project files', and the response was:
'use less, hur hur'
That's not newbie bashing, that's trying to be funny and sounding like an
ass
Now I must protest; you have gotten it all wrong.
I attempted to kill
* Anders Breindahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [0723 19:23]:
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 17:46, Dick Davies wrote:
The OP asked 'how do I read MS Project files', and the response was:
'use less, hur hur'
That's not newbie bashing, that's trying to be funny and sounding like an
ass
Now I must
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 03:15 -0500, Kent West wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Is T-bird so primitive that it doesn't have Reply-to-List?
Yes.
Blech. Mutt has had it for, what, a decade?
Did Netscape Communicator ever have it?
--
Are there any free software that would open MS Project files?
Rajiv
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 02:19, Rajiv Vyas wrote:
Are there any free software that would open MS Project files?
Rajiv
Have you tried `less`?
Regards, Anders Breindahl.
OT: My apologies to Rajiv Vyas for clobbing up his/her mailbox.
Why is reply-to not debian-user? Didn't it use to be?
my mistake. I pressed r in gmail, so it just responded to you and not the group.On 7/25/05, Anders Breindahl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:On Tuesday 26 July 2005 02:19, Rajiv Vyas wrote: Are there any free software that would open MS Project files?
RajivHave you tried `less`?Regards, Anders
Anders Breindahl wrote:
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 02:19, Rajiv Vyas wrote:
Are there any free software that would open MS Project files?
Rajiv
Have you tried `less`?
Why are you picking on (perceived?) newbies? That's not funny.
I'm pretty sure he needs more functionality than that.
And I
Thanks.
On 7/25/05, Michael Z Daryabeygi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anders Breindahl wrote: On Tuesday 26 July 2005 02:19, Rajiv Vyas wrote:Are there any free software that would open MS Project files?Rajiv Have you tried `less`?
Why are you picking on (perceived?) newbies? That's not funny.I'm
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 03:54, Michael Z Daryabeygi wrote:
Anders Breindahl wrote:
Have you tried `less`?
Why are you picking on (perceived?) newbies? That's not funny.
I'm pretty sure he needs more functionality than that.
And I know from his other thread that he is doing his best to get
Ok, this is my first foray into debian-user and this behaviour doesn't
impress me. I'm not a newbie, I've been using debian for the past 6
years after changing from redhat.
Did you actually bother to find anything out about MS Project? If it
is indeed in clear text then 'less' is a useful
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 04:35:50AM +0200, Anders Breindahl wrote:
I am also sorry to announce, that I am one of those, who will be ``jumping
down peoples' throats'' in the case of not keeping to the net-etiquette.
Stop it.
I've done that, but I've always regretted it. Correct people, fine,
On Monday 25 July 2005 11:21 pm, Carl Fink wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 04:35:50AM +0200, Anders Breindahl wrote:
I am also sorry to announce, that I am one of those, who will be
``jumping down peoples' throats'' in the case of not keeping to the
net-etiquette.
Stop it.
I've done
There was something similar called TaskJuggler, but I don't know whether or
not it will read/write Project files. As someone said, Project is a beast,
and I don't know if TJ is up to that level yet, since I haven't looked at it
in over a year.
On Monday 25 July 2005 22:15, Rajiv Vyas wrote:
23 matches
Mail list logo
