On 2020-04-21 17:39:55 +0200, n...@dismail.de wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 17:07:52 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Sometimes packages get renamed. [...]
> >
> > [...] if one
> > wants to remove it, then apt or aptitude will also want to remove
> > the new
On 2020-04-21 18:37:03 +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 05:31:38PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2020-04-21 16:44:57 +0300, Reco wrote:
> > > apt install apt-build
> > >
> > > Requires some scripting to run without a human intervention, it's
> > > relatively simple.
> >
> >
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 17:07:52 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Sometimes packages get renamed. [...]
>
> [...] if one
> wants to remove it, then apt or aptitude will also want to remove
> the new package because this new package has not been installed
> manually and its only
Hi.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 05:31:38PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2020-04-21 16:44:57 +0300, Reco wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:23:37PM +0200, Thomas Martin wrote:
> > > My goal is simple : I'm applying few modifications on some Debian
> > > pa
Hi,
On 2020-04-21 16:44:57 +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:23:37PM +0200, Thomas Martin wrote:
> > My goal is simple : I'm applying few modifications on some Debian
> > packages and would like those packages to be rebuilt with my changes
> > when a new package
Sometimes packages get renamed. A renamed package becomes a
"transitional package", which can be tracked by deborphan and
can safely removed if it no longer has any reverse dependencies.
The issue is that if this was a manually installed package,
typically with no past dependencies
Hi,
Thank you, I will check this out.
Thomas
Le mar. 21 avr. 2020 à 15:45, Reco a écrit :
>
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:23:37PM +0200, Thomas Martin wrote:
> > My goal is simple : I'm applying few modifications on some Debian
> > packages and w
Hi.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:23:37PM +0200, Thomas Martin wrote:
> My goal is simple : I'm applying few modifications on some Debian
> packages and would like those packages to be rebuilt with my changes
> when a new package version is available.
apt install apt-build
Requ
Hello,
I would like to know what is the simplest way to rebuild Debian
packages automatically when a new version of the package is released ?
My goal is simple : I'm applying few modifications on some Debian
packages and would like those packages to be rebuilt with my changes
when a new package
;
> > > I'm setting out to do an _extremely_ custom *minimal* install of Buster.
> > > The desired inventory shall list *ONLY* top level packages.
> > > [ E.G. if gfortran was purposely installed, the ~dozen packages
> > > installed because they were tag
On Du, 05 apr 20, 11:59:17, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I did a test run. I think I see the pattern of which packages it marks as
> manual.
> E.G. It shows systemd related items as "manual". But for *MY* purposes I
> would class them as "auto". That will not be a
On Du, 05 apr 20, 11:52:32, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> From what I've seen, it looks as if debian-installer also flags some
> packages as manually installed, during initial install of the Debian
> system. I don't know which ones do and don't get that treatment.
At least the packag
On 04/05/2020 01:29 PM, Marco Möller wrote:
Once you have your list of packages in a text file, for each package one
line, you could apply the list like this:
apt install $(< mylist.txt)
Good to know that is known to work.
Consider to first do a simulation run for finding probl
Once you have your list of packages in a text file, for each package one
line, you could apply the list like this:
apt install $(< mylist.txt)
Consider to first do a simulation run for finding problems in the list:
-s
Consider to use the following flag in order to not draw in a ma
* top level packages.
[ E.G. if gfortran was purposely installed, the ~dozen packages
installed because they were tagged as depends, recommends, or suggests
wold *NOT* be listed. ]
Is there a suitable tool? [Synaptic's History menu item is closest
I've found].
I assume that what you're after
On Sun 05 Apr 2020 at 10:30:41 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote:
> I currently have a configuration of Stretch that meets most of my needs.
> I'm setting out to do an _extremely_ custom *minimal* install of Buster.
> The desired inventory shall list *ONLY* top level packages.
> [ E.G.
have a configuration of Stretch that meets most of my
needs. As the installation was performed using the default Debian
installer, there is a plethora of packages of no interest installed.
As some important packages are not installed by default, apt and
Synaptic were used to install them.
I'm
tion of Stretch that meets most of my
> needs. As the installation was performed using the default Debian
> installer, there is a plethora of packages of no interest installed.
> As some important packages are not installed by default, apt and
> Synaptic were used to install them.
was performed using the default Debian installer,
there is a plethora of packages of no interest installed. As some
important packages are not installed by default, apt and Synaptic were
used to install them.
I'm setting out to do an _extremely_ custom *minimal* install of Buster.
The desired inventory
On 3/29/20 10:22 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2020-03-29 at 15:10, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
>> On Du, 29 mar 20, 14:47:57, The Wanderer wrote:
>>
>>> On my system, when I run
>>>
>>> apt-get dist-upgrade
>>>
>>> and say "yes"
On 2020-03-29 at 15:10, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 29 mar 20, 14:47:57, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On my system, when I run
>>
>> apt-get dist-upgrade
>>
>> and say "yes" to the list of packages, the following things happen:
>>
>>
On Du, 29 mar 20, 14:47:57, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> On my system, when I run
>
> apt-get dist-upgrade
>
> and say "yes" to the list of packages, the following things happen:
>
> * apt-get downloads all the packages, but does not install them yet.
> * ap
e), and not just the name of the package.
>>
>
> Okay, How can I do that for each upgradeable package ?
On my system, when I run
apt-get dist-upgrade
and say "yes" to the list of packages, the following things happen:
* apt-get downloads all the packages, but doe
On 3/24/20 3:46 AM, David Wright wrote:
> Then you have to split the upgrade command into a download-only part
> (-d in apt-get, and I assume it's the same in apt), and the installing
> part itself (with no -d).
> man apt-listchanges says:
>
> apt-listchanges [[options...]] {[--apt] |
On Tue 24 Mar 2020 at 11:40:56 (+), Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar, 2020 at 00:35:39 +0200, Anastasios Lisgaras wrote:
> > 2) With the "changelog" I got the change logs, but i think i'm not just
> > getting the last ones ..
> >
> > apt changelog openssh-client :
On Tue, 24 Mar, 2020 at 00:35:39 +0200, Anastasios Lisgaras wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My update/upgrade system script is about that :
> sudo apt update && sudo apt list --upgradable -a && sudo apt
> dist-upgrade -y && sudo apt autoremove -y && sudo apt autoclean -y &&
> sudo apt clean -y
>
> But I
pdate
> available package.
This time, the bare package name is sufficient, and by default you get
the installed version's changelog. You have to add options (like those
for the install command) so it can download a different version to
give you the information for packages not already ins
Hello,
My update/upgrade system script is about that :
sudo apt update && sudo apt list --upgradable -a && sudo apt
dist-upgrade -y && sudo apt autoremove -y && sudo apt autoclean -y &&
sudo apt clean -y
But I want for *each* package that has an update available, before I
update it to see its
In Goa various Cruise agencies give different services in different price
ranges. But if you are looking for some wonderful facilities within pocket
friendly budget then I am suggesting you the agency named *Champions Yacht
Club*. There you can get different types of Cruises such as sunrise and
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 14:29 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 02:26:26PM -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> > Tixy, thanks. I did check the latest Deb 10 version but not the change
> log.
> > I was fooled by the Debian version number which looks like the BSD number
> > which I guess
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 02:26:26PM -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> Tixy, thanks. I did check the latest Deb 10 version but not the change log.
> I was fooled by the Debian version number which looks like the BSD number
> which I guess never changes.
https://www.debian.org/security/faq#version
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:13 Tixy wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 11:53 -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> > I started looking in to use of OpenSMPTD for a mail server and have
> > installed it from Debian packages.
> >
> > In the process of reading a blog article
on't see any
> provision for systemd. I don't grok systemd very well and usually
> rely on others for the proper setup.
And that's why the lazy among us use Debian packages - because packages
tend to fix such problems.
> I have asked for help on the OpenSMTPD mailing list,
But you'll like
Tom Browder writes:
> I started looking in to use of OpenSMPTD for a mail server and have
> installed it from Debian packages.
>
> In the process of reading a blog article by the current developer I
> discovered the upstream is now at version 6.6.2p1+ after some serious
> se
Quoting Tom Browder (2020-02-12 18:53:09)
> I started looking in to use of OpenSMPTD for a mail server and have
> installed it from Debian packages.
>
> In the process of reading a blog article by the current developer I
> discovered the upstream is now at version 6.6.2p1+ aft
On qua, 12 fev 2020, Tom Browder wrote:
I started looking in to use of OpenSMPTD for a mail server and have
installed it from Debian packages.
In the process of reading a blog article by the current developer I
discovered the upstream is now at version 6.6.2p1+ after some serious
security
On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 11:53 -0600, Tom Browder wrote:
> I started looking in to use of OpenSMPTD for a mail server and have
> installed it from Debian packages.
>
> In the process of reading a blog article by the current developer I
> discovered the upstream is now at version 6.6.
t; installation (with appropriate renaming). I haven't received an answer
> yet.
Well, you have two main issues.
First, you'll want to make sure *other* packages know that you have
a mail-transport-agent installed. The Debian answer to this is a
package called "equivs" which lets
I started looking in to use of OpenSMPTD for a mail server and have
installed it from Debian packages.
In the process of reading a blog article by the current developer I
discovered the upstream is now at version 6.6.2p1+ after some serious
security issues were discovered by SSL Labs (Qualys
binaries, and probably should be removed..?
What's the way to notify about this kind of packages?
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#removing-packages
Kind regards,
Andrei
Thanks!
, and probably should be
> removed..?
>
> What's the way to notify about this kind of packages?
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#removing-packages
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
of packages?
Thanks!
[0] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openbve-data
[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openbve
On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 08:42:45PM -0700, Ralph Katz wrote:
Try ~$ whatis packagename # for installed packages
That's a useful tool, thanks. It doesn't take package names, it takes
binary program names, or more specifically, manual page names. So it
works if the binary program name
On 1/2/20 9:48 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
[snip]
>
> You can inspect the first line of any package's Description field with
>
> apt show packagename | grep ^Description
Try ~$ whatis packagename # for installed packages
Regards,
Ralph
signature.asc
Description: Ope
On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 11:17:39PM -0500, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
Hi, and Happy New Year (almost)!
This is something that might be helpful for newbies especially. Was
going through some things on my computer and found a NICE list of
familiar Linux package names with SUPER BRIEF, SUPER SIMPLE
Scratch:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/8.4/prologue/package-choices.html
Personally, I've been seeing some of those package names for MANY
years. This is the first time I finally understood what they do...
instead of them just being e.g. a blip in a long list of other
packages that needed
w process, when there are hundreds or even thousands of packages you
> don't (currently) need.
# mark gnome-core as manually installed to prevent it and all it's
# dependencies to be considered for autoremoval
apt-mark manual gnome-core
# remove the gnome metapackage
# this will result in many packag
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 02:04:16PM +0200, aprekates wrote:
> So some packages with other arch cant be installed so there is
> no need for dpkg to differentiate the name.
>
> But i can install binutils-common in my system from many archs
> so the suffix (thanks for the co
So some packages with other arch cant be installed so there is
no need for dpkg to differentiate the name.
But i can install binutils-common in my system from many archs
so the suffix (thanks for the correction) helps to differentiate.
Thanks
Alexandros
On 18/11/19 12:53 μ.μ., Reco wrote
> GNU assembler, ..
>
> why dpkg -l adds the :arch prefix in some package names and not in others?
If a package has "Multiarch: same" flag (binutils-common is one of
these) it means it can be installed several times with the different
architectures.
dpkg shows such packages with
Looking at dpkg -l output i noticed:
ii binutils 2.31.1-16 amd64 GNU assembler, linker and
binary utilities
ii binutils-common:amd64 2.31.1-16 amd64 Common files for
the GNU assembler, ..
why dpkg -l adds the :arch prefix in some package names and not in others?
On Sat 26 Oct 2019 at 17:53:45 +, J.Arun Mani wrote:
> Thanks for your replies. Disk usage is not an issue for me, so I may
> ignore them for now.
You have a functional Debian system and chose to install Debian Buster
GNOME Edition. Stick with it and stop fussing about installed software
you
Thanks for your replies. Disk usage is not an issue for me, so I may ignore
them for now.
J Arun Mani
munity and not by all! My question is "Is there a valid
> reason why Debian includes these (5, 7, 8) packages by default?" And
> will uninstalling them (all apps mentioned above) cause any trouble?
>
The short answer is: 'you installed Gnome'. You therefore get whatever
the Gn
ound a lot of apps which are rarely used by me.
[snip list of specific applications]
[Question2]
After using query at
https://www.debian.org/distrib/packages#search_packages
specifying either "Package names only" or "Descriptions" as appropriate,
"What do they _all_ have in c
munity and not by all! My question is "Is there a valid
> reason why Debian includes these (5, 7, 8) packages by default?" And
> will uninstalling them (all apps mentioned above) cause any trouble?
>
> Thanks for your patience ^^
> J Arun Mani
Gnome desktop is a m
feel that though, apps excluding the starred ones might have a use, but
really 5, 7, 8 are
not generally used apps. It is used by a particular community and not by all!
My question is
"Is there a valid reason why Debian includes these (5, 7, 8) packages by
default?" And will uninstalling
gt; from chaos. :)
>
> Figure out the package versions you want, and tell apt to
> install them directly; to install foobar version 3.2.1-1+deb9u1:
>
> apt install foobar=3.2.1-1+deb9u1
>
> You can specify multiple packages this way, and remove packages
> by appending a - to t
sion 3.2.1-1+deb9u1:
apt install foobar=3.2.1-1+deb9u1
You can specify multiple packages this way, and remove packages
by appending a - to the end of their name instead of a version.
-dsr-
>
>
>
> Reason this option is not enabled by default is, as I understand it,
> that a) downgrades are officially unsupported (in reality they commonly
> work,
Glad to hear this. Now i had a answer to this question: does debian
package management system have
a downgrade mechanism similar to
een interface (simply invoke with no arguments)
b) advanced search
c) advanced conflict resolution, computing multiple options
With above config option in place, the conflict resolution is adjusted
so that the default proposal is to _not_ upgrade conflicting packages,
and subsequent proposals f
f from typing upgrade ：）
>
> Thx Jiri
>
> On 22/10/19 8:33 pm, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > Hi Jiri,
> >
> > Quoting Jiri Kanicky (2019-10-22 09:20:57)
> >> I just updated my desktop Sid and it removed most core KDE packages.
> >>
> >> When
I understand how it works. I am just warning others to wait before they
upgrade unless they want to have it broken.
Thx Jiri
On 22/10/19 8:33 pm, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi Jiri,
Quoting Jiri Kanicky (2019-10-22 09:20:57)
I just updated my desktop Sid and it removed most core KDE packages
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> When you use Debian Sid, you are expected to understand how to hold back
> updates during library migrations.
>
> I recommend to either a) use Debian testing or Debian stable, or b) be
> more cautious when updating packages - e.g. look at the warnings
Hi Jiri,
Quoting Jiri Kanicky (2019-10-22 09:20:57)
> I just updated my desktop Sid and it removed most core KDE packages.
>
> When i try to install it back, it tells me dependencies are missing.
>
> Dont recommend update to all KDE users.
When you use Debian Sid, y
Hi.I just updated my desktop Sid and it removed most core KDE packages.When i try to install it back, it tells me dependencies are missing.Dont recommend update to all KDE users.
, September 13, 2019, 4:10:38 PM EDT, David Christensen
wrote:
When I see "The following packages have been kept back", I usually type:
# apt-get dist-upgrade
I'm glad it worked for you. :-)
I try to make backups, archives, and imaging my religion. Those skills
give mor
On 9/13/19 12:49 PM, D Dimov wrote:
I upgraded to Debian 10, but 750 or so packages were held back. I read that i
can try running apt-get --with-new-pkgs upgrade, which I did, but I still have
278 that are held back (listed below).
Tried apt-get install , but they are still held
back. How do
Le jeu. 12 sept. 2019 à 15:28, hamster a écrit :
>
> Je vais sans doute répondre a ta demande, mais pourquoi du NAT ? Il est
> beaucoup plus simple d'attribuer directement une adresse publique fixe a
> chaque poste. Bien sur c'est difficile a faire en IPv4 par manque
> d'adresses, mais si tu le
Le jeu. 12 sept. 2019 à 17:35, Frédéric MASSOT <
frede...@juliana-multimedia.com> a écrit :
>
>
> Si tu as un fichier de règles iptables, tu peux utiliser la cible "-j
> LOG" ainsi que les options "--log-level" et "--log-prefix".
>
> Avec une règle:
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j LOG
Le 12/09/2019 à 15:18, Olivier a écrit :
> Bonjour,
>
> J'ai une machine sous Stretch qui fait office de routeur sur un réseau
> local.
> Elle implémente une fonction NAT avec une centaine d'utilisateurs sur le
> réseau local et un trafic de l'ordre de 200Mb/s (j'ai du mal à évaluer
> le nombre
Le 12/09/2019 à 15:18, Olivier a écrit :
> Bonjour,
>
> J'ai une machine sous Stretch qui fait office de routeur sur un réseau
> local.
> Elle implémente une fonction NAT avec une centaine d'utilisateurs sur
> le réseau local et un trafic de l'ordre de 200Mb/s (j'ai du mal à
> évaluer le nombre de
Bonjour,
J'ai une machine sous Stretch qui fait office de routeur sur un réseau
local.
Elle implémente une fonction NAT avec une centaine d'utilisateurs sur le
réseau local et un trafic de l'ordre de 200Mb/s (j'ai du mal à évaluer le
nombre de paquets par seconde) voire d'avantage.
Je souhaite
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 01:23:20PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> I was hoping to have some sort of package I could install on each system I
> admin. There would be a script or something that would keep a database
> updated of what is happening with packages on that system.
Th
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 9:38 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 02:55:20PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> > Does anyone know of a "software inventory" solution for Debian (or other
> > GNU/Linux OSes) ?
> >
> > I'm thinking something th
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 02:55:20PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> Does anyone know of a "software inventory" solution for Debian (or other
> GNU/Linux OSes) ?
>
> I'm thinking something that keeps track of packages. I.e. when various
> package versions become available
Greetings,
Does anyone know of a "software inventory" solution for Debian (or other
GNU/Linux OSes) ?
I'm thinking something that keeps track of packages. I.e. when various
package versions become available and when upgrades happen to said packages.
There are a variety of ways of
Hi,
Sure the reason is clearly there:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=vte2.91=experimental
I don't know why I was so confused between the apt output (and also
using synaptic) regarding this? But probably be it was too late for me
at that time :-)
Thanks!
> Hi,
>
> Since the last upload of version 0.57.90-1 to experimental on the
> 21th August (
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/vte2.91), the packages are not in the
> scope of
> apt (deb https://deb.debian.org/debian experimental main contrib non-
> free).
>
&
Hi,
Since the last upload of version 0.57.90-1 to experimental on the 21th August (
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/vte2.91), the packages are not in the scope of
apt (deb https://deb.debian.org/debian experimental main contrib non-free).
But regarding the https://packages.debian.org
On 8/25/19, Daniel Rossi wrote:
> I've tried to figure out this myself, but have been forced here. I need
> to enable a feature which was added in git but not packaged for buster
> yet, I have exactly the same problem with Ubuntu Bionic. I would like to
> make unsta
I've tried to figure out this myself, but have been forced here. I need
to enable a feature which was added in git but not packaged for buster
yet, I have exactly the same problem with Ubuntu Bionic. I would like to
make unstable packages of this for releasing to raspberry PI also.
I've tried
Hi,
Knut Hengstenberg wrote:
> > we want to have the information, which binary packages belong to a
> > certain source package. So for example the source package 0ad has two
> > binary packages:
> >
> > https://packages.debian.org/source/jessie/0ad
Andrei POPESCU
On Jo, 22 aug 19, 09:03:59, Knut Hengstenberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for a project, I would like to have the relationship "Debian source
> package <-> Debian binary packages". So all the existing source
> packages can be found for each distributio
Great, this seems to be the right place, thanks for the link. Unfortunately I
do not see a possibility to get the information of the assignment between
source package and binary packages.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 09:03:59AM +0200, Knut Hengstenberg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for a project, I would like to have the relationship "Debian source package
> <-> Debian binary packages". So all the existing source packages can be found
> for each distributio
Hi all,
for a project, I would like to have the relationship "Debian source package <->
Debian binary packages". So all the existing source packages can be found for
each distribution here (for jessie):
https://packages.debian.org/source/jessie/allpackages
Now we want to have
Sven,
Thank you very much for your reply.
I executed `dpkg -V` and it listed
`/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libavcodec.so.58.35.100`.
I purged `libavcodec58` and installed `libavcodec-extra`, which,
obviously, installed `libavcodec-extra58` under the hood.
This solved my segfault issue. I've
On 2019-08-20 16:38 +0700, Nikolay Turpitko wrote:
> Sorry to bother you. But is seems something is wrong after recent
> automatic update of ffmpeg package on Debian Buster on my laptop.
>
> I tried to fill the bug with reportbug, but it seems it haven't sent
> the mail.
>
&g
Hello,
Sorry to bother you. But is seems something is wrong after recent
automatic update of ffmpeg package on Debian Buster on my laptop.
I tried to fill the bug with reportbug, but it seems it haven't sent the
mail.
Packages that were upgraded:
ffmpeg libavcodec58 libavdevice58
> On 2019-07-08 19:21 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>> I am trying to look which packages are new in buster that were not in
>> stretch. I am using aptitude since it't great tool for browsing packages.
Sven Joachim wrote:
> Beware that the list of new packages
On 2019-07-08 19:21 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I am trying to look which packages are new in buster that were not in
> stretch. I am using aptitude since it't great tool for browsing packages.
Beware that the list of new packages in buster is way too large to
browse ca
Hello,
I am trying to look which packages are new in buster that were not in
stretch. I am using aptitude since it't great tool for browsing packages.
until now it was easy:
do 'f'orget new packages in aptitude
change sources.list to point to new release
do 'u'pdate packages list
... voila
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:17:45PM -0400, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> For newbies peeking in, every single one of those 91 incoming
> *upgraded* packages is OVERWRITING... OBLITERATING.. the otherwise
> stable packages that Developers manually tweaked especially for one's
> current
On 7/1/19, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 12:13:00PM +0200, Rodrigo Olmos wrote:
>> > For security critical packages like web browsers I would always
>> > recommend getting a newer version from unstable or from stable-security
>> > ASAP.
>>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 12:13:00PM +0200, Rodrigo Olmos wrote:
> > For security critical packages like web browsers I would always recommend
> > getting a newer version from unstable or from stable-security ASAP.
>
> What would be the best procedure as of today to have v7
> For security critical packages like web browsers I would always recommend
> getting a newer version from unstable or from stable-security ASAP.
What would be the best procedure as of today to have v75 instead of
v73 on stretch? I tried pinning v75 from unstable but it suggests huge
chang
On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 at 17:57, Lazar Tadić wrote:
> Chromium is currently 2 major and 3 minor versions behind upstream in
> both Stretch and Buster. Please consider uploading a recent version to
> address 34 open security issues, before the complete freeze on 25th of
> June.
>
I have recently
601 - 700 of 10428 matches
Mail list logo
