On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 16:23 -0400, Vikki Roemer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:59:31AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Where do these lusers keep coming from? *shakes head*
NC, I think.
Hey, aren't *you* from NC ;)
--
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 15:29 -0700, Laura Melton wrote:
On 09/15/2005 01:36 PM, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
Vikki Roemer wrote:
[snip AOL user's plea for help]
[snip]
I tried to email her privately but was bounced by the AOL mail
server because that user wasn't accepting mail from my email
Hi,
Could someone help me read the /proc/mdstat file on my Sarge.
I am doing disk mirroring with 2 disks.
at the end of md7 and md5 I have [_U] written
all others have [UU] at their ends.
What does this mean??
has the raid failed in md7 and md5
Please let me know.
Here is the full
On 9/9/05, antgel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Siju George wrote:
Hi,
Could someone help me read the /proc/mdstat file on my Sarge.
I am doing disk mirroring with 2 disks.
at the end of md7 and md5 I have [_U] written
all others have [UU] at their ends.
What does this mean??
Siju George a écrit :
On 9/9/05, antgel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Siju George wrote:
Hi,
Could someone help me read the /proc/mdstat file on my Sarge.
I am doing disk mirroring with 2 disks.
at the end of md7 and md5 I have [_U] written
all others have [UU] at their ends.
What does
: quanta-data (= 4:3.4.0-0pre1) but 4:3.4.0-0pre3 is to
be installed
E: Broken packages
Please help
Regards
Alvin James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alvin James wrote:
As a result of the KDE problems I have re-installed my system,
That's a Windows way of thinking, but oh well, it's done.
only
thing is I need to have quanta plus working as I use it for work. can
you tell me what I could do is there a sources.list I can use to revert
back to
Hi Alvin,
Alvin James wrote:
As a result of the KDE problems I have re-installed my system, only
thing is I need to have quanta plus working as I use it for work. can
you tell me what I could do is there a sources.list I can use to revert
back to the last working version of KDE that I can use.
Alvin James wrote:
As a result of the KDE problems I have re-installed my system, only
thing is I need to have quanta plus working as I use it for work. can
you tell me what I could do is there a sources.list I can use to revert
back to the last working version of KDE that I can use.
It
Hi,
my notebook, Acer Aspire 1363 WLMi, 15,4 WXGA Display with
a native resolution of 1280x800, has a horrible look.
It looks very good, when working with non native resolutions
of e. g. 1024x768 and 1152x768 (i. e. when it must
interpolate this resolution). I have played a lot with
the
At 19:55 2005-07-31, you wrote:
I did my first Debian installation yesterday and
met the same problem when I did a reboot. So I
did some searches in
http://www.linuxquestions.orgwww.linuxquestions.org
and saw one post suggesting that it might be the
initrd line in grub.conf. then I changed
On Sunday 31 July 2005 19.55, ZeeGeek wrote:
I did my first Debian installation yesterday and met the same problem when
I did a reboot. So I did some searches in
www.linuxquestions.orghttp://www.linuxquestions.organd saw one post
suggesting that it might be the initrd line in
grub.conf. then
Hello!
I have installed a Debian 2.6.8 standard kernel from the Debian ftp server
using Dselect. But it won't boot up my system! :-( HELP! :-)
This is the output:
/sbin/init: 432: cannot open dev/console: No such file
Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init!
The kernel is precompiled btw.
My
Em Dom 31 Jul 2005 10:14, Björn Johansson escreveu:
Hello!
I have installed a Debian 2.6.8 standard kernel from the Debian ftp server
using Dselect. But it won't boot up my system! :-( HELP! :-)
This is the output:
/sbin/init: 432: cannot open dev/console: No such file
Kernel panic:
Hi,
On dim, 2005-07-31 at 15:14 +0200, Björn Johansson wrote:
Hello!
I have installed a Debian 2.6.8 standard kernel from the Debian ftp server
using Dselect. But it won't boot up my system! :-( HELP! :-)
This is the output:
/sbin/init: 432: cannot open dev/console: No such file
At 18:37 2005-07-31, you wrote:
Hi,
On dim, 2005-07-31 at 15:14 +0200, Björn Johansson wrote:
Hello!
I have installed a Debian 2.6.8 standard kernel from the Debian ftp server
using Dselect. But it won't boot up my system! :-( HELP! :-)
This is the output:
/sbin/init: 432: cannot open
At 19:44 2005-07-31, you wrote:
On dim, 2005-07-31 at 19:22 +0200, Björn Johansson wrote:
Well.. I haven't specified anything. Like I said
before, I installed a precompiled
package from my Debian system using Dselect.
It seems that now kernel packages try to setup the bootloader, but it
may
Björn Johansson wrote:
[snip]
I'm using grub and yes I will look at the config file once I get back to my
Linux system.. I have spent at least 24 hours in getting that Sarge system
to work, so I really don't like Debian right now, but tomorrow at gets
number
one in Linux distributions once
Le jeudi 16 juin 2005 10:53 +0530, Siju George a crit :
Hi all,
My Sarge installation went alright and also I installed apache, php4,
samba, postfix, mysql packages but when I reboot I get the following
error.
Toill now I have used only Ext3 file system this time I dared to use
ReiserFS
1- you've got a dying or malfunctioning hard drive
2- a bad connection (cable ?) between the HD and your motherboard
check n2 first ...
WRT reiserfs it has been many years I haven't seen bug reports, but you
never know ...
the dma stuff is lower level than the file system anyway
da:
Hi all,
My Sarge installation went alright and also I installed apache, php4,
samba, postfix, mysql packages but when I reboot I get the following
error.
Toill now I have used only Ext3 file system this time I dared to use
ReiserFS is it a problem with ReiserFS???
Could someone please tell me
ratikanta rath [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please help this poor student by mailing me the CDs if you have
Did you check if you would not have to pay high import taxes if somebody
sends you CDs from abroad? I think you would better try to get them from
within India.
Robert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
He described its features in a manner which made me to
lay awake whole night. I have a very low-end computer
with 5GB hard disk and 122MB RAM. It can boot from
CDROM. I am running WinXP Pro successfully on it. I
can not upgrade my PC due to money problems.
mmm XP with 122MB of RAM ... no
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 06:55:22PM +0200, Cyprien wrote:
lay awake whole night. I have a very low-end computer
with 5GB hard disk and 122MB RAM. It can boot from
CDROM. I am running WinXP Pro successfully on it. I
can not upgrade my PC due to money problems.
mmm XP with 122MB of RAM ... no
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 08:50:33PM +0200, Debian User wrote:
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 06:55:22PM +0200, Cyprien wrote:
lay awake whole night. I have a very low-end computer
with 5GB hard disk and 122MB RAM. It can boot from
CDROM. I am running WinXP Pro successfully on it. I
can not upgrade my
More than that. Could XP run with 128MB of RAM ?
Cyp
Minimum RAM for xp pro is 64 (from microsoft), minimum recommended
128. Experience shows sluggishness at half a gig.
--
Regards, Dave
My notion of a husband at forty is that a woman should be able to change him,
like a bank note,
Note- I began liking debian after i heard of it.
Please help this poor student by mailing me the CDs if
you have
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am Ratikanta Rath from Angul(Orissa). I am a below
middle-class(above poverty) boy living in a village of
Jarasigha, near Angul town.
Two months ago, I heard
On Sunday 29 May 2005 15:40, ratikanta rath wrote:
Note- I began liking debian after i heard of it.
Please help this poor student by mailing me the CDs if
you have
If you search, you may find a LUG (Linux User Group) in your area. If you
attend a meeting, or contact them through
On Sunday 29 May 2005 15:40, ratikanta rath wrote:
Note- I began liking debian after i heard of it.
Please help this poor student by mailing me the CDs if
you have
This mail looks like a hoax to me, but anyway...
Go to the Ubuntu website below
http://shipit.ubuntulinux.org
on Fri, May 13, 2005 at 02:16:22PM -0600, Glenn English ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 15:09 -0400, Angelina Carlton wrote:
Just for those of us just following along, can I use fdisk to record
the EXACT information on my currently working systems to a file, and
be sure
Karsten M. Self wrote:
on Fri, May 13, 2005 at 02:16:22PM -0600, Glenn English ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 15:09 -0400, Angelina Carlton wrote:
Just for those of us just following along, can I use fdisk to record
the EXACT information on my currently working systems to a
Marty wrote:
Along the general lines of backing up systems and critical data,
there's also the dpkg (or apt) option to produce a list of packages
that can be used to reproduce a complete debian installation.
(I don't have it at my fingertips. Can anyone refresh my memory?)
Here it is,
dpkg
I did a trial on a smaller hard disk. Installed knoppix on it,
rebooted from the hdd to test it. Rebooted again from the Live CD and
(after taking down the Linux partition info) deleted the partitions
and created just one partition, and changed the type to bf (Solaris)
-- the same thing which
Deboo writes:
Someone mentioned that it's theoretically possible to reconstruct and get
all data back.
Nothing theoretical about it. If all you did was repartition all you did
was write a new partition table to the MBR. The data was not touched. Put
the MBR back the way it was and you're
Deboo ^ wrote:
I did a trial on a smaller hard disk. Installed knoppix on it,
rebooted from the hdd to test it. Rebooted again from the Live CD and
(after taking down the Linux partition info) deleted the partitions
and created just one partition, and changed the type to bf (Solaris)
-- the same
On 5/15/05, Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deboo ^ wrote:
I did a trial on a smaller hard disk. Installed knoppix on it,
rebooted from the hdd to test it. Rebooted again from the Live CD and
(after taking down the Linux partition info) deleted the partitions
and created just one
Deboo ^ wrote:
I was already wared about such a thing and that's why I did this small
trial. But now I am stuck what to do to get the data back ... other
than by getting a newer hard drive ...which would be hard on the
pocket for me.
Again, attempting to duplicate a problem like this is
On Sun, 15 May 2005, Deboo ^ wrote:
Well, I just wanted to do a trial run of what I was to do on the drive
in question so I installed knoppix on this smaller drive, booted it to
test it is working, then booting off the knoppix CD again, I deleted
the partitions (the same thing that
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 03:17:31AM -0400, Deboo ^ wrote:
I did a trial on a smaller hard disk. Installed knoppix on it,
rebooted from the hdd to test it. Rebooted again from the Live CD and
(after taking down the Linux partition info) deleted the partitions
and created just one partition, and
On 5/13/05, Tony Godshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
According to Lee Braiden,
On Friday 13 May 2005 18:32, Deboo ^ wrote:
Since it's not yet formatted, I would think there must be a way to
recover all the data still. I could install this knoppix on the small
3 GB hdd and connecting the
Deboo ^ wrote:
I have lots of data on it, useful data and lots of linux things I
wouldn't like to lose. Can someone help?
I've had luck with gpart[1] in the past, it'll scan the disk and find
any partition boundaries (oh the fun of accidentally writing a rescue
floppy image to /dev/hda).
[1]
On 5/13/05, Jeremy T. Bouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quite a pickle you've found yourself in, this is a good example
for why not using root much is good. If at this time all you've done is
repartition and save the partition table then the data *should* still be
in tact on the drive.
On 5/13/05, Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deboo ^ wrote:
I accideantally fdisked my linux hard disk and deleted all
partitions, created one single solaris partition.
If you ever ran lilo on a root partition of the disk, then it probably saved
a copy of the mbr in the /boot directory
On 5/13/05, Angelina Carlton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 02:32:16PM -0400, Marty wrote:
Deboo ^ wrote:
I accideantally fdisked my linux hard disk and deleted all
partitions, created one single solaris partition.
If you ever ran lilo on a root partition of the disk,
On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 21:06 -0400, Deboo ^ wrote:
On 5/13/05, Jeremy T. Bouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quite a pickle you've found yourself in, this is a good example
for why not using root much is good. If at this time all you've done is
repartition and save the partition table
On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 21:12 -0400, Deboo ^ wrote:
On 5/13/05, Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deboo ^ wrote:
I accideantally fdisked my linux hard disk and deleted all
partitions, created one single solaris partition.
If you ever ran lilo on a root partition of the disk, then it
Deboo ^ wrote:
On 5/13/05, Marty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deboo ^ wrote:
I accideantally fdisked my linux hard disk and deleted all
partitions, created one single solaris partition.
If you ever ran lilo on a root partition of the disk, then it probably saved
a copy of the mbr in the /boot
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 09:59:32PM -0400, Marty wrote:
The format of the MBR and the fake partition table sectors is documented
in various books about PC hardware, and probably on the web, except for
the details of logical partition table chains which seem hard to find.
Hopefully you won't
Disks? Who needs Disks?
http://www.bash.org/?98
ikkenai i don't have hard drives. i just keep 30 chinese teenagers in my
basement and force them to memorize numbers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I accideantally fdisked my linux hard disk and deleted all
partitions, created one single solaris partition. I wanted to do this
on my second hard disk and thought I had connected the second one and
disconnected the first, but hadn't disconnected the first one really.
Now I am unable to boot.
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 13:32 -0400, Deboo ^ wrote:
Since it's not yet formatted, I would think there must be a way to
recover all the data still.
I think that's right. If you know *exactly* the way the disk was
partitioned before (and nothing has been written to it), you should be
able to run
On 5/13/05, Glenn English [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 13:32 -0400, Deboo ^ wrote:
Since it's not yet formatted, I would think there must be a way to
recover all the data still.
I think that's right. If you know *exactly* the way the disk was
partitioned before (and
On Friday 13 May 2005 18:32, Deboo ^ wrote:
Since it's not yet formatted, I would think there must be a way to
recover all the data still. I could install this knoppix on the small
3 GB hdd and connecting the big hdd, try to recover. Is there a
program I can use to recover the data?
Yes,
space to copy data
off the drive in question. Hope this helps you.
- Original Message -
From: Lee Braiden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: Please help: Accidentally wiped off the whole hard disk!!!
On Friday 13 May 2005
Quoting Jason G Skala [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There is a great program out there called Stellar Phoenix
http://www.stellarinfo.com/
It is not free however it does work and works well I have used it on
my NTFS drives and linux drives even used it on a Tivo Drive. The
program is a read only so you will
Hello
Deboo ^ ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I accideantally fdisked my linux hard disk and deleted all
partitions, created one single solaris partition. I wanted to do this
on my second hard disk and thought I had connected the second one and
disconnected the first, but hadn't disconnected the
Deboo writes:
Well, what would have been written on to the disk other than the new
partition information and that is in the MBR. No formatting wsaa done.
If all you did was repartition the disk you can fix it completely by
partitioning it back exactly the way it was. Just get out your printed
Deboo ^ wrote:
I accideantally fdisked my linux hard disk and deleted all
partitions, created one single solaris partition.
If you ever ran lilo on a root partition of the disk, then it probably saved
a copy of the mbr in the /boot directory which can be manually restored with
a disk editor (for
Quite a pickle you've found yourself in, this is a good example
for why not using root much is good. If at this time all you've done is
repartition and save the partition table then the data *should* still be
in tact on the drive. Experience with data forensics has taught me this.
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 02:32:16PM -0400, Marty wrote:
Deboo ^ wrote:
I accideantally fdisked my linux hard disk and deleted all
partitions, created one single solaris partition.
If you ever ran lilo on a root partition of the disk, then it probably saved
a copy of the mbr in the /boot
Deboo ^ ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I accideantally fdisked my linux hard disk and deleted all
partitions, created one single solaris partition. I wanted to do this
on my second hard disk and thought I had connected the second one and
disconnected the first, but hadn't disconnected
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Angelina Carlton wrote:
Just for those of us just following along, can I use fdisk to record
the EXACT information on my currently working systems to a file, and
fdisk -l /dev/hda /tmp/hda.fdisk.lst
be sure that file contained enough information to rebuild the
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 15:09 -0400, Angelina Carlton wrote:
Just for those of us just following along, can I use fdisk to record
the EXACT information on my currently working systems to a file, and
be sure that file contained enough information to rebuild the
partition table if ever needed? Is
Jeremy writes:
Let me put the disclaimer out there that partitioning is a destructive
process by it's very nature.
Partitioning changes nothing but the partition table which is in the MBR.
Nothing else on the disk is touched.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alvin Oga wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2005, Angelina Carlton wrote:
Just for those of us just following along, can I use fdisk to record
the EXACT information on my currently working systems to a file, and
fdisk -l /dev/hda /tmp/hda.fdisk.lst
be sure that file contained enough information to rebuild
According to Lee Braiden,
On Friday 13 May 2005 18:32, Deboo ^ wrote:
Since it's not yet formatted, I would think there must be a way to
recover all the data still. I could install this knoppix on the small
3 GB hdd and connecting the big hdd, try to recover. Is there a
program I can use
Add yourself to Pau's address book!
Open your invitation
This invitation was sent to debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org on behalf of Pau Peris ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
If you do not wish to receive invitations from this Ringo member, click here. To stop receiving invitations from all
j'ai déjà posté ça il ya quelques jours mais
sans réponse
peut etre quelqu'un pourrait m'expliquer comment
réparer calà :
merci d'avance
Device Boot
Start End
Blocks Id
System/dev/hda1
1 3969 261 82
Linux swapPartition 1 does not end on cylinder
boundary: phys=(248, 254, 63)
Franck REY a écrit :
j'ai déjà posté ça il y a quelques jours mais sans réponse
peut etre quelqu'un pourrait m'expliquer comment réparer calà :
merci d'avance
Device BootStart EndBlocks Id System
/dev/hda1 1 3969 261 82 Linux swap
Partition 1
Okay, I have followed the instructions in the manual, but I still can't
get TILP to work on either my Fedora installation or my Debian
installation, but I can't figure out what I am doing wrong.
In Debian, I have USB support and the tiusb kernel module present, and I
even see that the
In an attempt to mount /usr normally and then remount it ro to upgrade
packages I must have screwed something.
Now in order to straighten things I have tried to mount the /usr rw upon
boot but I still get errors.
Here is what I do and related data. Any help please ???
TIA,
Bob
t40:/home/bob#
Hello Bob, hello list!
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 03:21:00PM +0100, Bob Alexander wrote:
[...]
dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute post-removal script: Permission denied
dpkg: error processing gtkhtml3.2 (--remove):
subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 2
[...]
/dev/hda10
Bob Alexander wrote:
In an attempt to mount /usr normally and then remount it ro to upgrade
packages I must have screwed something.
/dev/hda8 /var ext3 rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev 0 0
^^
Those scripts that dpkg can't execute- they are in /var/lib/dpkg/info/.
--
To
Florian Ernst wrote:
Hello Bob, hello list!
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 03:21:00PM +0100, Bob Alexander wrote:
[...]
dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute post-removal script: Permission denied
dpkg: error processing gtkhtml3.2 (--remove):
subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 2
), over a
ProLiant DL360.
I' d like to know where I could find some information.
Please help me not to use Fedora, I did resist till now!
Thanks in advance to all of you.
Flavio Volpi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I' d like to know where I could find some information.
Please help me not to use Fedora, I did resist till now!
search the list archives for 'qlogic'.
here is starting message for you as well.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/11/msg00052.html
-matt zagrabelny
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
I hope someone can help me.. Im desperate..
Recently I changed my /etc/apt/sources.list to upgrade from woody to sarge.
All in all it went reasonably well. This is my current sources.list:
SOURCES.LIST
-
deb ftp://ftp.debian.nl/debian/ sarge main non-free contrib
deb-src
I hope someone can help me.. Im desperate..
Recently I changed my /etc/apt/sources.list to upgrade from woody to sarge.
All in all it went reasonably well. This is my current sources.list:
SOURCES.LIST
-
deb ftp://ftp.debian.nl/debian/ sarge main non-free contrib
deb-src
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Jacco Hoeve wrote:
ERROR
-
Nov 17 22:36:55 server01 postfix/master[15177]: fatal: getaddrinfo: Servname
not supported for ai_socktype
Translation:
You're missing something in /etc/services.
In other words, you're telling postfix to connect to something like
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Jacco Hoeve wrote:
ERROR
-
Nov 17 22:36:55 server01 postfix/master[15177]: fatal: getaddrinfo:
Servname
not supported for ai_socktype
Translation:
You're missing something in /etc/services.
In other words, you're telling postfix to connect to something
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Jacco Hoeve wrote:
ERROR
-
Nov 17 22:36:55 server01 postfix/master[15177]: fatal: getaddrinfo: Servname
not supported for ai_socktype
Translation:
You're missing something in /etc/services.
Reported as
Hi All,
On my home PC (333MHZ Celeron, 192MB RAM) I was happy user of Woody with
KDE (regullary updated) as my desktop env. Graphical desktop started
about 1-2 minutes and after next 1 minute I had fully functional desktop.
But one day I decided to upgrade to Sarge - after one day battle it
--- Mirek Stefanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But one day I decided to upgrade to Sarge - after one day battle it was
done. Now I have to wait about 10 minutes to start KDE desktop, and
This is normal for KDE.
-- Thomas Adam
=
The Linux Weekend Mechanic -- http://linuxgazette.net
TAG
Hello
Mirek Stefanski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On my home PC (333MHZ Celeron, 192MB RAM) I was happy user of Woody
with KDE (regullary updated) as my desktop env. Graphical desktop
started about 1-2 minutes and after next 1 minute I had fully
functional desktop.
But one day I
Mirek Stefanski wrote:
Hi All,
On my home PC (333MHZ Celeron, 192MB RAM) I was happy user of Woody
with KDE (regullary updated) as my desktop env. Graphical desktop
started about 1-2 minutes and after next 1 minute I had fully
functional desktop.
But one day I decided to upgrade to Sarge -
On November 14, 2004 05:16, Thomas Adam wrote:
--- Mirek Stefanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But one day I decided to upgrade to Sarge - after one day battle it was
done. Now I have to wait about 10 minutes to start KDE desktop, and
This is normal for KDE.
No its not! I have a similarly
| On my home PC (333MHZ Celeron, 192MB RAM)
| I was happy user of Woody with KDE (regullary updated)
| as my desktop env.
|
| Graphical desktop started about 1-2 minutes
| and after next 1 minute I had fully functional desktop.
|
| But one day I decided to upgrade to Sarge
| - after one day
El Domingo, 14 de Noviembre de 2004 13:29, Mirek Stefanski escribió:
Hi All,
On my home PC (333MHZ Celeron, 192MB RAM) I was happy user of Woody with
KDE (regullary updated) as my desktop env. Graphical desktop started
about 1-2 minutes and after next 1 minute I had fully functional
Thanks All,
Ken wrote:
For diagnostic purposes, create a new user, and log in to KDE as that
user. Does that user have a slow login also? If not, the problem is in
your personal KDE settings. If so, then it's a system-wide problem. But
I suspect it's in your files rather than system-wide, thus
Mirek Stefanski wrote:
I removed (purged) all desktop (lastly was installed gnome -similiar
behavior - but why?) packages and installed kde-core package. Start
time about 10-12 minutes.
Then I renamed Desktop and all .k* files in my home directory and ...
similiar results (next restart after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mirek Stefanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But one day I decided to upgrade to Sarge - after one day battle it
was done. Now I have to wait about 10 minutes to start KDE desktop,
and first start of any application (konsole, mozilla) takes a long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- Mirek Stefanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But one day I decided to upgrade to Sarge - after one day battle it was
done. Now I have to wait about 10 minutes to start KDE desktop, and
This is normal
I want to remove AOL art files it is slowing my computer down so much IM thinking about buying 3gateway computers to replace my dell computers.
All,
I am unable to change passwd as it fails with error message passwd:
Authentication token manipulation error. My /etc/pam.d/passwd contains
#
# The PAM configuration file for the Shadow `passwd' service
#
# This file is blank to allow fall-through to the 'other' service.
As
Hi,
s. keeling wrote:
Incoming from Eduard Breuer:
I searched the web first and also googled the debian site and here is
the resource I got:
http://www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-mini/Debian-and-Windows-Shared-Printing.html
to start with the possible source of my troble.
I followed the instructions
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 15:22, linux wrote:
aptitude update
Command not found.
Aptitude is becoming preferred to apt-get, but may not be installed if
you are running Woody. Install it as root:
$ su
# apt-get install aptitude
# aptitude update
should now work, updating the list of
I searched the web first and also googled the debian site and here is
the resource I got:
http://www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-mini/Debian-and-Windows-Shared-Printing.html
to start with the possible source of my troble.
I followed the instructions and did:
1) apt-get update.
successfull
2)apt-get
Incoming from Eduard Breuer:
I searched the web first and also googled the debian site and here is
the resource I got:
http://www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-mini/Debian-and-Windows-Shared-Printing.html
to start with the possible source of my troble.
I followed the instructions and did:
1) apt-get
You can accomplish this with resin.
You can tell resin which hosts resin should take care of and which it
shouldn't.
read some docs and give it a whirl
www.caucho.com
resin 3.0.9 has been release as GPL.
Pritpal Dhaliwal
Roozemond, D.A. wrote:
Hi,
Few virtual sites needs tomcat in order to
Hi,
I have configured apache with mass virtual hosting by adding following
line to apache's conf files.
VirtualDocumentRoot /var/vhosts/%0/httpdocs/
and everything seems to work just fine with a little exception.
Few virtual sites needs tomcat in order to work. I have installed
tomcat4 and
601 - 700 of 1642 matches
Mail list logo
