Am 25.04.2024 schrieb David Mehler :
> Since changing systems to Debian 12.5 I can't send, though checking
> the password with a manual login to Dovecot works fine.
Sending mails is SMTP and therefore postfix on your machine.
It can use PAM for auth. Do you use PAM?
Hello,
I have a quick question. Can Debian, and/or it's
Postfix/Dovecot/MySQL/MariaDB packages support the argon2 password
hashing scheme? I had a previously-working e-mail setup on a *BSD
system, utilizing the argon2ID scheme with Dovecot, Postfix, and MySQL.
Since changing syste
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 21:30:22 +0100
Sven Joachim wrote:
> Wow. Looking into the BTS, I found bug #895089[1], changed "c_rehash"
> to "openssl rehash" in /usr/lib/postfix/configure-instance.sh as
> recommended there, and now "systemctl restart postfix.servi
On 21/01/2023 01:55, Charles Curley wrote:
root@white:~# ps aux | grep -i openssl
root 4586 5.8 0.9 8256 2064 pts/3S+ 11:48 0:00 grep
--colour=auto -i openssl
root 4587 150 2.1 4720 ?R11:48 0:00
/usr/bin/openssl x509 -subject_hash_old -fingerprint
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 21:30:22 +0100
Sven Joachim wrote:
> Wow. Looking into the BTS, I found bug #895089[1], changed "c_rehash"
> to "openssl rehash" in /usr/lib/postfix/configure-instance.sh as
> recommended there, and now "systemctl restart postfix.s
On 2023-01-20 21:11 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2023-01-20 20:45 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> My hunch is that postfix recomputes all the hashes in
>> /var/spool/postfix/etc/ssl/certs, rather than copying the files from the
>> host system into the chroot whi
laptop
> >> there are very long delays both at boot:
> >>
> >> ,
> >> | $ systemd-analyze blame | head -n1
> >> | 33.340s postfix@-.service
> >> `
> >
> > A delay that's a multiple of 30 seconds is very often a DNS look
88 4720 ? R 11:48 0:00 /usr/bin/openssl x509
>> -subject_hash_old -fingerprint -noout -in QuoVadis_Root_CA_2.pem
>
> Indeed I see many calls to openssl in top, apparently they are children
> of a single c_rehash process. CPU load is low here, though (2-3 %).
>
>> I have n
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 11:37 AM Charles Curley
wrote:
>
> I upgraded an i386 machine from bullseye to bookworm. Postfix now
> refuses to run.
>
> root@white:/var/spool# systemctl start postfix@-.service
> Job for postfix@-.service failed because a timeout was exceeded.
>
ot_CA_2.pem
Indeed I see many calls to openssl in top, apparently they are children
of a single c_rehash process. CPU load is low here, though (2-3 %).
> I have no idea what that's about. Maybe someone with SSL experience can
> chime in here?
My hunch is that postfix recomputes all t
On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 14:28:22 -0500
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> More multiples of 30 seconds. I'm still thinking "DNS issue".
In this case, laziness. The default timeout is 60 seconds. I added 30
to that. Then doubled it. Etc. That doesn't mean you are wrong. I'd
like to know what that ssl command is
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 11:55:35AM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> My previous timeout vale was 180 seconds, which wasn't enough. So my
> ancient anemic box needed between 180 and 360 seconds to start postfix.
> (But see below.)
More multiples of 30 seconds. I'm still thinking "DNS issue".
-analyze blame | head -n1
>> | 33.340s postfix@-.service
>> `
>
> A delay that's a multiple of 30 seconds is very often a DNS lookup
> failure. I would imagine your postfix configuration is trying to
> perform a DNS lookup on some hostname or other, and tha
xperience can
chime in here?
My previous timeout vale was 180 seconds, which wasn't enough. So my
ancient anemic box needed between 180 and 360 seconds to start postfix.
(But see below.)
To repeat your commands:
root@white:~# systemd-analyze blame | grep postfix
4min 24.559s postfix@-.se
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 07:17:37PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> It seems that postfix's startup time has greatly regressed, on my laptop
> there are very long delays both at boot:
>
> ,
> | $ systemd-analyze blame | head -n1
> | 33.340s postfix@-.service
> `
A
On 2023-01-20 09:34 -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:52:29 -0700
> Charles Curley wrote:
>
>> That suggests there's something wrong with
>> the way systemd is starting postfix. I will look into that later
>> today.
>
> Not quite &qu
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 11:52:29 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> That suggests there's something wrong with
> the way systemd is starting postfix. I will look into that later
> today.
Not quite "later today", but:
A bit of thinking about it, and I realized that the computer i
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:00:31 -0500
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Run the postfix executable by hand as root, and look for error
> messages and log entries in /var/log/mail.log among other locations.
Well, that was interesting. Thanks.
In mail.log I found the following from an earlier run:
2
Charles Curley wrote:
> I upgraded an i386 machine from bullseye to bookworm. Postfix now
> refuses to run.
Run the postfix executable by hand as root, and look for error messages
and log entries in /var/log/mail.log among other locations.
-dsr-
I upgraded an i386 machine from bullseye to bookworm. Postfix now
refuses to run.
root@white:/var/spool# systemctl start postfix@-.service
Job for postfix@-.service failed because a timeout was exceeded.
See "systemctl status postfix@-.service" and "journalctl -xeu
postfix
On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 07:10:17AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
To people who have familiarity with both postfix and exim4, is postfix really
easier (in a variety of senses) than exim4? LIke to install, setup, and use?
IMO, yes. It's also easier to find solutions to problems o
On 8/9/22 7:10 pm, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
To people who have familiarity with both postfix and exim4, is postfix
really
easier (in a variety of senses) than exim4? LIke to install, setup, and use?
I tried to set up postix back near the beginning of my Linux odyssey, maybe
sometime between
ugh I find exim4 really big and difficult to apprehend.
> It's incredibly easy using postfix sender_dependent_relayhost_maps
To people who have familiarity with both postfix and exim4, is postfix really
easier (in a variety of senses) than exim4? LIke to install, setup, and use?
I t
t the fact that I had enabled auth
in the main.cf file must mean that postfix was automagically going to use port
587 instead of port 25. Now I know better.)
Doc
--
Web: http://enginehousebooks.com/drevans
able
https://stafwag.github.io/blog/blog/2018/03/04/postfix-smarthost-with-authentication/
The best place to ask postfix questions is postfix mail list:
https://www.postfix.org/lists.html
Postfix developers answer there.
You can try to debug and increase logging :
https://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_R
I am trying to configure postfix correctly to send e-mail to a gmail.com
account, using my gmail credentials.
1. It all works fine if I use Thunderbird, with the following configuration:
server name: smtp.googlemail.com
port:587
Connection security: STARTTLS
Authentication
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 08:51:29 +0100
Darac Marjal wrote:
> On the upside, though, this is an allowlist of domains postfix will
> accept mail for. If there are duplicates, it shouldn't REALLY make
> much difference.
Thanks for the analysis.
I don't mind the duplicates, and th
On 20/04/2021 00:08, Charles Curley wrote:
> On installing on Bullseye, I usually install postfix, then configure it
> with "dpkg-reconfigure postfix".
>
> I use postfix here only for logwatch and other system emails, so the
> setup isn't concerned with the Internet
On installing on Bullseye, I usually install postfix, then configure it
with "dpkg-reconfigure postfix".
I use postfix here only for logwatch and other system emails, so the
setup isn't concerned with the Internet at large.
The default list of systems to accept mail for doesn
On Wed 16 Dec 2020 at 19:00:29 (+0100), Erik wrote:
> On 16-12-2020 18:24, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Erik wrote:
> > > I am doing an unattended install of Debian Buster with postfix being
> > > added using apt-install in the preseed/late_command.
> > >
> > &g
On 16-12-2020 18:24, Dan Ritter wrote:
Erik wrote:
I am doing an unattended install of Debian Buster with postfix being
added using apt-install in the preseed/late_command.
Without a postfix preseed definition in my preeseed file, I get the expected
question about what kind of mail
Erik wrote:
> I am doing an unattended install of Debian Buster with postfix being
> added using apt-install in the preseed/late_command.
>
> Without a postfix preseed definition in my preeseed file, I get the expected
> question about what kind of mail configuration I would
Hi,
I am not sure where to go with this. It relates to postfix, but is not a
problem
with postfix itself.
May one of you can help me along.
I am doing an unattended install of Debian Buster with postfix being
added using apt-install in the preseed/late_command.
Without a postfix preseed
myhostname = myhost.local
really?
I changed the name of mail server :)
1) uid of postfix user
id postfix
119
Are there any issues in the log?
journalctl _UID=
output of journalctl _UID=199 it's normal
thanks
--
Pol
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 09:12:28PM +0200, Pòl Hallen wrote:
> Hi folks :-)
> suddenly postfix is dead. Sometime after 1/2mins goes down... sometime
> doesn't start...
>
> I already tried to reinstall with purge, delete config files, etc. but same
> problem...
>
> h
Hi folks :-)
suddenly postfix is dead. Sometime after 1/2mins goes down... sometime
doesn't start...
I already tried to reinstall with purge, delete config files, etc. but
same problem...
help me please :)
here /etc/postfix/main.cf and above logs
compatibility_leve
; You could then decide to drop squirrelmail, or simply continue using
> that as well for email.
>
> MJ
>
> Op 30-5-2020 om 21:14 schreef Gokan Atmaca:
> > Hello
> >
> > I am using Postfix. (Postfix, OpenLdap, Dovecot, Squirrelmail) My goal
> > is to sync
21:14 schreef Gokan Atmaca:
Hello
I am using Postfix. (Postfix, OpenLdap, Dovecot, Squirrelmail) My goal
is to synchronize contacts and calendars. I have to do ActiveSync for
this. How can I resolve ActiveSync ? Is there an open source solution
?
Thanks.
M Charles Curley
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 30 May 2020 22:14:12 +0300
> Gokan Atmaca wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > I am using Postfix. (Postfix, OpenLdap, Dovecot, Squirrelmail) My goal
> > is to synchronize contacts and calendars. I have to do ActiveSync for
> > th
native?
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 1:07 PM Alexandre Rossi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > I am using Postfix. (Postfix, OpenLdap, Dovecot, Squirrelmail) My goal
> > is to synchronize contacts and calendars. I have to do ActiveSync for
> > this. How can I resolve ActiveSync ? Is ther
Hi,
> I am using Postfix. (Postfix, OpenLdap, Dovecot, Squirrelmail) My goal
> is to synchronize contacts and calendars. I have to do ActiveSync for
> this. How can I resolve ActiveSync ? Is there an open source solution
> ?
Postfix does not support this.
ActiveSync is a Microsoft
On Sat, 30 May 2020 22:14:12 +0300
Gokan Atmaca wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am using Postfix. (Postfix, OpenLdap, Dovecot, Squirrelmail) My goal
> is to synchronize contacts and calendars. I have to do ActiveSync for
> this. How can I resolve ActiveSync ? Is there an open
Gokan Atmaca wrote:
> I am using Postfix. (Postfix, OpenLdap, Dovecot, Squirrelmail) My goal
> is to synchronize contacts and calendars. I have to do ActiveSync for
> this. How can I resolve ActiveSync ? Is there an open source solution
> ?
look at syncevolution. I do not know abou
Hello
I am using Postfix. (Postfix, OpenLdap, Dovecot, Squirrelmail) My goal
is to synchronize contacts and calendars. I have to do ActiveSync for
this. How can I resolve ActiveSync ? Is there an open source solution
?
Thanks.
Also, a special thanks to Reco for his contribution. I am learning from
https://wiki.debian.org/PowerPC/ppc32
However, I got a "Not Found" error from
https://archive.debian.org/ports/powerpc/
But I have an idea, based on the original Thread: Get the 32 Bit PPC
Wheezy DVD. Again, thanks!
On Mo
El lun, 09-03-2020 a las 10:58 -0400, Kenneth Parker escribió:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020, 8:46 AM Greg Wooledge
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 05:11:29PM +1030, dva...@internode.on.net
> > wrote:
> > > $ more /etc/issue
> > > Debian GNU/Linux 7 n l
> >
> > Yikes.
> >
> > > apt-get instal
Hi.
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:58:41AM -0400, Kenneth Parker wrote:
> So how far back, in the Debian Archives do I need to go, before I find
> something that supports a G4?
[1] lists Powermac G4 in ppc32 list.
[2] tells us, quoting "The last supported release for 32-bit PowerPC is
Debian
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020, 8:46 AM Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 05:11:29PM +1030, dva...@internode.on.net wrote:
> > $ more /etc/issue
> > Debian GNU/Linux 7 n l
>
> Yikes.
>
> > apt-get install of that fails with:
> > Err http://ftp.au.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main stunnel4 i386
> >
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 05:11:29PM +1030, dva...@internode.on.net wrote:
> $ more /etc/issue
> Debian GNU/Linux 7 n l
Yikes.
> apt-get install of that fails with:
> Err http://ftp.au.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main stunnel4 i386
> 3:4.53-1.1
> 404 Not Found [IP: 150.203.164.37 80]
https://wiki
Apologies for this webmail thing not threading - it doesn't have
Richard Hector's reply,
so this can only be a new post. :-(
My postfix is: mail_version = 2.9.6 , so the second method at
http://www.postfix.org/TLS_README.html#client_smtps
needs to be used. But I'm still o
On 9/03/20 5:25 pm, dva...@internode.on.net wrote:
>
> Outgoing mail is blocked here until I figure out how to adapt to my
> ISP's move
> from SMTP on port 25 to SMTPS on port 465 for subscriber's outgoing mail.
> For more than a decade I've run postfix, though an
Outgoing mail is blocked here until I figure out how to adapt to my
ISP's move
from SMTP on port 25 to SMTPS on port 465 for subscriber's outgoing
mail.
For more than a decade I've run postfix, though an MTA isn't
essential for one user, I'll admit.
Scouring a bunch of
On 15/2/19 13:59, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
Hi, Reco. Thanks for your reply.
> Its' expected. /var/run is a symlink to /run, in-memory filesystem
> (tmpfs). Which becomes empty after each reboot.
> Every time you boot, systemd calls systemd-tmpfiles with the
> following config:
>
> $ cat /usr/lib
Hi.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 01:18:50PM -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> But I have noticed that after doing a reboot I have this problem again.
Its' expected. /var/run is a symlink to /run, in-memory filesystem
(tmpfs). Which becomes empty after each reboot.
Every time you boot, systemd cal
Hi all!
I am observing the following problem after the upgrade from Jessie to
Stretch at the time of trying to deliver each mail:
--
[/var/run/cyrus/socket/lmtp]: Permission denied
--
The delivery is normalized after executing this command:
--
# dpkg-statoverride --force
After updating to the 9.5 version, I receive the following errors in mail.log.
Jul 16 09:32:45 webmail postfix/scache[1318]: statistics: start interval Jul 16
09:28:33
Jul 16 09:32:45 webmail postfix/scache[1318]: statistics: domain lookup hits=0
miss=8 success=0%
Jul 16 09:32:45 webmail
I try to configure postfix machine act as smarthost
i.e.
--8<---cut here---start->8---
[...]
sender_dependent_default_transport_maps=hash:/etc/postfix/sender_transport_maps
smtp_sender_dependent_authentication = yes
smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/p
l this, though, because the
1. Exim can do this, so why not postfix ;) I was simply curious.
> standard set of Received: headers should give you a series of
> timestamps that show the time it took for the message to make
> its way across the Internet and to your mail server, Once it's
>
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:38:39PM +0200, Kamil Jońca wrote:
>
> Exim has a nice feature: it puts "Delivery-date" header when terminates
> delivery to pipe/mailbox.
>
> Is it posible with postfix?
It is possible, not necessarily convenient.
Here's ho
Exim has a nice feature: it puts "Delivery-date" header when terminates
delivery to pipe/mailbox.
Is it posible with postfix?
KJ
--
http://wolnelektury.pl/wesprzyj/teraz/
Down with categorical imperative!
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
> Sven Hartge:
>> systemd happily runs "legacy" LSB init scripts
>>
> ... except when its one-size-fits-all approach does not work, of
> course. Example:
> * https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/386846/
> This is the problem with even Mewburn rc scripts (a
Sven Hartge:
systemd happily runs "legacy" LSB init scripts
... except when its one-size-fits-all approach does not work, of
course. Example:
* https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/386846/
This is the problem with even Mewburn rc scripts (as I can attest from
personal experience of wr
Tom Browder:
# systemctl enable postfix # systemctl daemon-reload
Minor note: enable incorporates a daemon-reload.
Christian Seiler wrote:
> Now, that doesn't mean that you should still write _new_ init scripts
> for custom services if you're going to use systemd anyway. There it
> will be a good idea to learn how to do that with native systemd
> service units.
Exactly.
I was able to create much simpler and
Am 2017-08-21 11:52, schrieb Tom Browder:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 02:36 Sven Hartge wrote:
Question: Why do you want to manually replace the init-script from
postfix in Jessie with a systemd.unit? What do you want to
accomplish by
doing so (other than creating a possible broken system)?
I
e convoluted handling that I haven't
>>> figured out yet. Surely some expert can write a postfix.service
>>> file that drives postfix commands.
>> Question: Why do you want to manually replace the init-script from
>> postfix in Jessie with a systemd.unit? What do you w
figured
> > out yet. Surely some expert can write a postfix.service file that
> > drives postfix commands.
...
> Question: Why do you want to manually replace the init-script from
> postfix in Jessie with a systemd.unit? What do you want to accomplish by
> doing so (other than
Tom Browder wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 12:30 Sven Hartge wrote:
>> That unit file does effectivly nothing. It just starts "/bin/true" and
>> exits.
>>
>> What it *not* does is starting postfix in any way.
>>
>> This looks like there should
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 12:30 Sven Hartge wrote:
> Tom Browder wrote:
>
> > The contents of the postfix.service file are;
>
...
> That unit file does effectivly nothing. It just starts "/bin/true" and
> exits.
>
> What it *not* does is starting postfix
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 12:30 Sven Hartge wrote:
> Tom Browder wrote:
>
> > The contents of the postfix.service file are;
>
...
>
> That unit file does effectivly nothing. It just starts "/bin/true" and
> exits.
>
> What it *not* does is starting post
Tom Browder wrote:
> The contents of the postfix.service file are;
> [Unit]
> Description=Postfix Mail Transport Agent
> Conflicts=sendmail.service exim4.service
> ConditionPathExists=/etc/postfix/main.cf
> [Service]
> Type=oneshot
> RemainAfterExit=yes
> ExecStart=
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le tridi 3 fructidor, an CCXXV, Tom Browder a écrit :
>> So "disabled" is normal?
>
> Indeed. See:
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Deployment_Guide/ch-Services_and_Daemons.html#s3-services-configuration-enabling
I d
Le tridi 3 fructidor, an CCXXV, Tom Browder a écrit :
> So "disabled" is normal?
Indeed. See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Deployment_Guide/ch-Services_and_Daemons.html#s3-services-configuration-enabling
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: Digital s
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le tridi 3 fructidor, an CCXXV, Tom Browder a écrit :
>> > # systemctl start postfix
>> > # systemctl status postfix
>> >
>> > and got several lines basically saying posfix.service
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 10:17 Nicolas George wrote:
> Le tridi 3 fructidor, an CCXXV, Tom Browder a écrit :
> > > # systemctl start postfix
> > > # systemctl status postfix
> > >
> > > and got several lines basically saying posfix.service w
Le tridi 3 fructidor, an CCXXV, Tom Browder a écrit :
> > # systemctl start postfix
> > # systemctl status postfix
> >
> > and got several lines basically saying posfix.service was disabled.
> The exact message is:
>
> * postfix.service - Postfix Mail Tr
Le tridi 3 fructidor, an CCXXV, Tom Browder a écrit :
> I got a postfix.service file from a postfix developer and installed it in
> /etc/systemd/system as the docs mention.
>
> I then moved the /etc/init.d/postfix file away, reloaded the systemd
> daemon, and did:
>
> # sy
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Tom Browder wrote:
> I got a postfix.service file from a postfix developer and installed it in
> /etc/systemd/system as the docs mention.
>
> I then moved the /etc/init.d/postfix file away, reloaded the systemd daemon,
> and did:
>
> # sy
I got a postfix.service file from a postfix developer and installed it in
/etc/systemd/system as the docs mention.
I then moved the /etc/init.d/postfix file away, reloaded the systemd
daemon, and did:
# systemctl start postfix
# systemctl status postfix
and got several lines basically
Hi,
Quick question: I have a wheezy system (yes, we will upgrade) that needs
a more recent postfix. Postfix 2.11 is in backports, and I would like to
upgrade to that.
We are using dovecot from the regular repo, and posfix authenticated to
dovecot via sasl.
Is it safe to upgrade from
I added
> use_bayes_rules 1
> I started to get BAYES scores in the mail headers.
> That's probably a good start :-)
>
> Thanks to everyone who has responded to reassure me :-)
>
> Frank
>
>
> On 9 Jul 2017 at 23:26, debian-user@lists.debian.org wrote:
rd, I'm sending this same text to the
> SpamAssassin "users" mailing list - I'm not technically
> cross-posting, as that would probably earn me a bad
> reputation (or a kick).
>
> I've just built a new mailserver based on Debian 8.8,
> with Postfix + Cyrus. I
w mailserver based on Debian 8.8,
> > with Postfix + Cyrus. I have a long history of using
> > [..]
> > Any help would be much appreciated.
>
> Sorry man, this is off story. If i were you, i do not run email
> servers. Because it is very hard work always.
There are qui
"Frantisek Rysanek" 께서 쓰시길,
《記事 全文 <59629f76.25660.58659...@frantisek.rysanek.post.cz> 에서》:
> [...]
> I've just built a new mailserver based on Debian 8.8,
> with Postfix + Cyrus. I have a long history of using
> [..]
> Any help would be much appreciated.
n (or a kick).
I've just built a new mailserver based on Debian 8.8,
with Postfix + Cyrus. I have a long history of using
Amavis with SpamAssassin for SPAM filtering.
On the newly installed machine, there is
SpamAssassin 3.4.0-6 = the current version for Jessie.
And within SpamAssassin, my
Hello
I'm getting a table error. I got the database files from the site.
Can you help with this ?
Error:
postfix-cluebringer[32765]: [2016/12/01-20:04:28 - 306] [CORE] ERROR:
Database query failed: cbp::dblayer::DBSelect(107): Error executing
select: Table 'policyd.access_control'
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 06:24:35PM +0200, David FREYCHE wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am new on the list and using a debian distribution 8.0 Jessie with
> E-commerce CMS prestashop installed.
>
>
> Here is the facts:
>
> I receive spam on my mail queue (postqueue)
> I a
Hello,
I am new on the list and using a debian distribution 8.0 Jessie with
E-commerce CMS prestashop installed.
Here is the facts:
I receive spam on my mail queue (postqueue)
I already configured postfix with amavis for content filter which works fine
I want to
block sending my from a
re
> is no Sieve plugin for it. I shudder at reconfiguring the system for
> Dovecot!
>
> Thanks for giving me another keyword (sieve) to search!
>
>
I don't know anything about Postfix, but I'd have thought that the job
of dropping sorted mail into different Ma
On 31/08/16 15:02, Dan Ritter wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 01:21:13PM +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
Hi list,
I'm running postfix under Wheezy on my VPS, using a more or less
out-of-the-box configuration. My users access their mail via IMAP.
I subscribe to a number of mail lists, su
On 31/08/16 13:33, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:21:13 +0100 Tony van der Hoff
wrote:
So, I'd like to perform the filtering on the server (for my user
initially, then perhaps for others). My extensive googling reveals
that there are many tutorials for filtering spam, but that's
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 01:21:13PM +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm running postfix under Wheezy on my VPS, using a more or less
> out-of-the-box configuration. My users access their mail via IMAP.
>
> I subscribe to a number of mail lists, such as th
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:21:13 +0100 Tony van der Hoff
wrote:
> So, I'd like to perform the filtering on the server (for my user
> initially, then perhaps for others). My extensive googling reveals
> that there are many tutorials for filtering spam, but that's not
> really my problem.
What you're
Hi list,
I'm running postfix under Wheezy on my VPS, using a more or less
out-of-the-box configuration. My users access their mail via IMAP.
I subscribe to a number of mail lists, such as this one. I currently use
Thunderbird's filtering capability to sort mail into a
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Mark Fletcher wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 8:38 AM John T. Haggerty
> wrote:
>
>> Any thoughts for or against Amazon?
>>
>>
> Please don't top post on this list, it breaks up the flow of the thread
> for people who read the thread after it's finished. The
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 8:38 AM John T. Haggerty wrote:
> Any thoughts for or against Amazon?
>
>
Please don't top post on this list, it breaks up the flow of the thread for
people who read the thread after it's finished. The primary purpose of the
list is to get your questions answered, but the
gt;I have the following issue (seems to be common although my details seem
> >to
> >differ):
> >
> >1. I recently registered a new domain as WWW.whatever.org or whatever.
> >
> >2. Postfix gets installed.
> >
> >3. "Internet site " is enabled
day, August 25, 2016 at 4:20:05 AM UTC-5, John T. Haggerty wrote:
> > I have the following issue (seems to be common although my details seem
> to differ):
> >
> > 1. I recently registered a new domain as WWW.whatever.org or whatever.
> >
> > 2. Postfix gets insta
On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 4:20:05 AM UTC-5, John T. Haggerty wrote:
> I have the following issue (seems to be common although my details seem to
> differ):
>
> 1. I recently registered a new domain as WWW.whatever.org or whatever.
>
> 2. Postfix gets installed.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016年8月25日 18:15:48 JST, "John T. Haggerty" wrote:
>I have the following issue (seems to be common although my details seem
>to
>differ):
>
>1. I recently registered a new domain as WWW.whatever.org or whatever.
>
1 - 100 of 1656 matches
Mail list logo
