Re: java browser plugin on buster

On 20/06/19 6:18 AM, basti wrote: > Hello, i have an old Server with HP ILO2. The remote console on this > version of ilo need an java browser Plugin (not webstart). > > in stretch there was no problem i have used an old firefox 36 or so in > "portable" mode. > > now the icedtea plugin seem not a

Re: java browser plugin on buster

On 19.06.19 20:18, basti wrote: > Hello, i have an old Server with HP ILO2. The remote console on this > version of ilo need an java browser Plugin (not webstart). > > in stretch there was no problem i have used an old firefox 36 or so in > "portable" mode. > > now the icedtea plugin seem not ava

Re: java, javac versions not the same, apt-get doesn't help ...

On 1/12/18, Bastien Durel wrote: > Le vendredi 12 janvier 2018 à 04:20 -0500, Albretch Mueller a écrit : >> java gives you error messages when you compile and run code with >> different versions of the JVM >> >> while trying to update my box using apt-get I am getting: >> "openjdk-8-jdk is already

Re: java, javac versions not the same, apt-get doesn't help ...

Le vendredi 12 janvier 2018 à 04:20 -0500, Albretch Mueller a écrit : > java gives you error messages when you compile and run code with > different versions of the JVM > > while trying to update my box using apt-get I am getting: > "openjdk-8-jdk is already the newest version." > > How do you ma

Re: Java perspective missing in Eclipse 3.8.1-10

Le 05/08/2017 à 13:57, Joey Corleone a écrit : The Eclipse Debian package is outdated and not maintained currently [0]. I recommend downloading the most recent version of Eclipse directly from their website [1]. The installation is trivial and works out of the box. [0] https://bugs.debian.org/cg

Re: Java perspective missing in Eclipse 3.8.1-10

The Eclipse Debian package is outdated and not maintained currently [0]. I recommend downloading the most recent version of Eclipse directly from their website [1]. The installation is trivial and works out of the box. [0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681726 [1] https://www.ec

Re: Java (aka icedtea) plugin for iceweasel, settings

On 2015-11-25, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > I can pass options to java programs by setting the environment variable > JAVA_ARGS. This works by ultimately passing the contents of the > variable on the command line to the java runtime binary, such as > /usr/bin/java; well behaved packages do this themsel

Re: java script error in iceweasel

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 06:47:03AM -0500, Harold M. Meneley wrote: > Hi, I just tried using Jessie with the new Iceweasel. I went to several > web sites that worked before and I can't seem to get the java scripts > associated with buttons to work. I tried installing java, openjdk and > icedtea with

Re: java on wheezy

On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: > Francesco Pietra wrote: > > Is any official (= working) advice on getting java at work with wheezy > > (specifically in amd64, if relevant)? > > http://wiki.debian.org/Java > > > What should be installed/reconfigured/uninstalled other than t

Re: java on wheezy

Francesco Pietra wrote: > Is any official (= working) advice on getting java at work with wheezy > (specifically in amd64, if relevant)? http://wiki.debian.org/Java > What should be installed/reconfigured/uninstalled other than the packages > obtained from wheezy desktop install, followed by up

Re: java on wheezy

My test (and Java app I want to run) is sweethome3d. Wasn't working on wheezy. Upgraded to sid. Sweethome3d worked. Upgraded some days back, now it doesn't work. Not sure if I'm doing anything wrong. 64-bit. Haven't tested in a browser. Zenaan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@list

Re: Java Security Flaw

Patrick Bartek wrote: For the past couple of days have been reading about a major security hole in Java 7: (http://www.zdnet.com/homeland-security-warns-to-disable-java-amid-zero-day-flaw-709713/) And was wondering if IceTea might have the same flaw. As yet I've seen no mention of it.

Re: java plugin

On Tuesday 20 November 2012 16:32:35 you wrote: > I thought I read or heard on a podcast (TechSNAP???) that Firefox > (and by implicit extension Iceweasel) was blacklisting sun-java due > to Oracle's epic fail with security. Can anyone confirm? Using Iceweasel 10.0.10, from mozilla.debian.net in S

Re: java plugin

I thought I read or heard on a podcast (TechSNAP???) that Firefox (and by implicit extension Iceweasel) was blacklisting sun-java due to Oracle's epic fail with security. Can anyone confirm? Not sure of a fix, other than, maybe, try openjdk/icetea. I don't usually run java apps, if I can avoid it.

Re: java enable in Iceweasel (Sid)? -SOLVED

On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 18:17:39 +0100 Anthony Campbell wrote: Hello Anthony, >I'm in no position to laugh at her now. Sure you are. Just not with a clear conscience. :-)) -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)radnever immediately apparent" It coul

Re: java enable in Iceweasel (Sid)? -SOLVED

On 17 Jul 2012, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:07:20 +0100 > Anthony Campbell wrote: > > Hello Anthony, > > >OK, I found it - embarrassingly, java was disabled in Preferences! > > You've found the problem, that's what counts. Posting the solution to > the list is always a good ide

Re: java enable in Iceweasel (Sid)? -SOLVED

On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:07:20 +0100 Anthony Campbell wrote: Hello Anthony, >OK, I found it - embarrassingly, java was disabled in Preferences! You've found the problem, that's what counts. Posting the solution to the list is always a good idea. >Working OK now - apologies for troubling the lis

Re: java enable in Iceweasel (Sid)? -SOLVED

> > OK, I found it - embarrassingly, java was disabled in Preferences! > > Working OK now - apologies for troubling the list. I was trying to think what it might be. I run Iceweasel with SID and the only time I have 'trouble' with it, is when No-Script blocks it on a new site. I remember being c

Re: java enable in Iceweasel (Sid)?

On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:46:48 +0100 Anthony Campbell wrote: Hello Anthony, >I found the file IceTeaPlugin.so and copied it to ~/.mozilla/plugins, >but still no joy. The page I am trying to access keeps saying I must >have java enabled. The above entry from about:plugins seems to say I do, >but ap

Re: java enable in Iceweasel (Sid)? -SOLVED

OK, I found it - embarrassingly, java was disabled in Preferences! Working OK now - apologies for troubling the list. AC -- Anthony Campbell - a...@acampbell.org.uk http://www.reviewbooks.org.uk http://www.skepticviews.org.uk http://www.acupuncturecourse.org.uk http://www.smashwords.com/pro

Re: java enable in Iceweasel (Sid)?

On 17 Jul 2012, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:55:22 +0100 > Anthony Campbell wrote: > > Hello Anthony, > > >Following a suggestion on google I also installed icedtea-6-plugin but > >it doesn't seem to produce anything useful, similar to sunjavaplugin.so, > >which I used to have pre

Re: java enable in Iceweasel (Sid)?

On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 09:55:22 +0100 Anthony Campbell wrote: Hello Anthony, >Following a suggestion on google I also installed icedtea-6-plugin but >it doesn't seem to produce anything useful, similar to sunjavaplugin.so, >which I used to have previously. IcedTea is the correct plugin for the Ope

Re: java enable in Iceweasel (Sid)?

Anthony Campbell: > > Following a suggestion on google I also installed icedtea-6-plugin but > it doesn't seem to produce anything useful, similar to sunjavaplugin.so, > which I used to have previously. I don't know whether that actually helps you, but when dealing with the many Java alternatives

Re: java plugin, is does it have any security vulnerabilities ?

On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 21:54:09 +0100, dave selby wrote: > i am running Debian stable (squeeze) and have java installed > 6.26-osqueeze1 as a package. > > Firefox uses this package but when I asked it to check if plugins are up > to date it says nope, need version 7... Yes, the latest Oracle's Java

Re: java plugin, is does it have any security vulnerabilities ?

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 06:23:58PM -0400, Andrew Reid wrote: Hi, > You can switch to OpenJDK, or remove your sun-java6 packages and install > the JRE from the Oracle-provided binaries. I would rephrase it a little bit to 'You _should_ switch to OpenJDK and the icedtea browser plugin'. If you c

Re: java plugin, is does it have any security vulnerabilities ?

> Hi All, > > i am running Debian stable (squeeze) and have java installed > 6.26-osqueeze1 as a package. > > Firefox uses this package but when I asked it to check if plugins are > up to date it says nope, need version 7... > > So am I right in thinking that v6.26 is old (and thus the advice to

Re: java alternatives

El 2012-06-28 a las 13:33 -0600, ChadDavis escribió: (resending to the list) > >> I'm not looking for the update-java-alternatives or the > >> update-alternatives themselves.  I'm looking for the package lifecycle > >> scripts that actually invoke update-alternatives --install for each of > >> th

Re: java alternatives

El 2012-06-28 a las 10:59 -0600, ChadDavis escribió: (resending to the list) > > sm01@stt008:~$ locate update-alternatives > > /usr/sbin/update-alternatives > > (...) > > > > sm01@stt008:~$ file /usr/sbin/update-alternatives > > /usr/sbin/update-alternatives: a /usr/bin/perl -- script text execut

Re: java alternatives

On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:53:53 -0600, ChadDavis wrote: > I want to see the script that installs the alternatives when the > sun-java6-jdk is installed. I'm not that familiar with the .deb > structure, etc. I guess it's in some lifecycle script, but I don't know > where those end up. The update-al

Re: java alternatives

On 28/06/12 09:53, ChadDavis wrote: > I want to see the script that installs the alternatives when the > sun-java6-jdk is installed. I'm not that familiar with the .deb > structure, etc. I guess it's in some lifecycle script, but I don't > know where those end up. The update-alternatives man pag

Re: java alternatives

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 03:53:53PM -0600, ChadDavis wrote: > I want to see the script that installs the alternatives when the > sun-java6-jdk is installed. I'm not that familiar with the .deb > structure, etc. I guess it's in some lifecycle script, but I don't > know where those end up. The upda

Re: Java Error or so...

On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 21:04:59 +0300, Kostas Psilopoulos wrote: > in debian squeeze 2.6.32-5 with xen i try to set up a working eucalyptus > cloud I get a problem like this. > Is anyone aware of that kind of problem? how do i solve it, or anything > usefull at all? I'm kind of stuck in this... (...

Re: java plugin for iceweasel

On Sun, 29 May 2011 16:09:49 +, Hendrik Boom wrote: > What's the Debian way to get Java to work from iceweasel? Debian wiki has a good guide: http://wiki.debian.org/Java/Sun Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsu

Re: java plugin for iceweasel

2011/5/30 Johan Grönqvist > 2011-05-29 18:09, Hendrik Boom skrev: > > What's the Debian way to get Java to work from iceweasel? >> > > Here is what I would do: > > Try installing a plugin package like < > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=sun+java+plugin&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all

Re: java plugin for iceweasel

2011-05-29 18:09, Hendrik Boom skrev: What's the Debian way to get Java to work from iceweasel? Here is what I would do: Try installing a plugin package like , and lookout for

Re: java 5 in squeeze

On Friday 28 January 2011 20:24:01 Andrew McGlashan wrote: > Jochen Schulz wrote: > > Andrew McGlashan: > >> If sun-java5 continues to be important, then why not have a port in > >> squeeze too? > > > > Probably because it isn't supported upstream anymore: > > > > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/ >

Re: java 5 in squeeze

Hi, Jochen Schulz wrote: Andrew McGlashan: If sun-java5 continues to be important, then why not have a port in squeeze too? Probably because it isn't supported upstream anymore: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5/ | Java SE 5.0 is in its Java Technology End of Life (EOL) transition | period. The

Re: java 5 in squeeze

In <4d42f1db.4050...@affinityvision.com.au>, Andrew McGlashan wrote: >If sun-java5 continues to be important, then why not have a port in >squeeze too? No longer supported upstream. No volunteers have stepped forward to maintain it. Debian is a volunteer organization, so usually the reason some

Re: java 5 in squeeze

Andrew McGlashan: > Vu Ngoc VU wrote: >> >> As sun-java5-jre doesn't exist on Squeeze, there is no clue. >> But if you want to install some package that have the same name on >> both distros, you can use option -t with apt-get. > > If sun-java5 continues to be important, then why not have a port

Re: java 5 in squeeze

Hi, Vu Ngoc VU wrote: instead of replacing squeeze by lenny, you can add identical lines with lenny. So you have both in sources.list. At my work, some java programs required version 5 and other version 6. As sun-java5 is no more on Squeeze, i added Lenny in sources.list and then, use : apt-

Re: java 5 in squeeze

hello, instead of replacing squeeze by lenny, you can add identical lines with lenny. So you have both in sources.list. At my work, some java programs required version 5 and other version 6. As sun-java5 is no more on Squeeze, i added Lenny in sources.list and then, use : apt-get install sun-

Re: java 5 in squeeze

Joe Riel wrote: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:08:06 -0600 > "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote: > > >> I recommend not changing back your sources.list and actually adding >> the security repository for Lenny as well. >> > > I may have misinterpreted this. Are you saying to change it to lenny > and

Re: java 5 in squeeze

In <20110124131514.16ce33fe@gauss>, Joe Riel wrote: >On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:08:06 -0600 > >"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote: >> I recommend not changing back your sources.list and actually adding >> the security repository for Lenny as well. > >I may have misinterpreted this. Are you saying to chan

Re: java 5 in squeeze

On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:08:06 -0600 "Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote: > I recommend not changing back your sources.list and actually adding > the security repository for Lenny as well. I may have misinterpreted this. Are you saying to change it to lenny and not change it back after updating and in

Re: java 5 in squeeze

On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:32:48 +0100 Jochen Schulz wrote: > Joe Riel: > > Bob Proulx wrote: > > > >> If you absolutely need Java 1.5 then you will need to install the > >> older version from the Lenny non-free archive. > >> > >> http://packages.debian.org/lenny/sun-java5-jre > > > > Right. H

Re: java 5 in squeeze

(Please don't Cc: people in the list unless requested.) Joe Riel: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:32:48 +0100 >> >> In order to install packages from the non-free section, just add >> "non-free" at the end of your sources.list lines. Example for squeeze: >> >> deb http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian/ sque

Re: java 5 in squeeze

Joe Riel: > Bob Proulx wrote: > >> If you absolutely need Java 1.5 then you will need to install the >> older version from the Lenny non-free archive. >> >> http://packages.debian.org/lenny/sun-java5-jre > > Right. How would I do that? In order to install packages from the non-free section,

Re: java 5 in squeeze

In <20110124193731.ga25...@hysteria.proulx.com>, Bob Proulx wrote: >One Option: >Temporarily change your references from squeeze or sid in >/etc/apt/sources.list to "lenny". Run 'apt-get update', and then >'apt-get update install sun-java5-jre' and install. Then restore your >previous /etc/apt/so

Re: java 5 in squeeze

Joe Riel wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > If you absolutely need Java 1.5 then you will need to install the > > older version from the Lenny non-free archive. > > > > http://packages.debian.org/lenny/sun-java5-jre > > Right. How would I do that? My knowledge of debian's package manager > is mi

Re: java 5 in squeeze

On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 20:05:21 +0100 "Hans-J. Ullrich" wrote: > Am Montag, 24. Januar 2011 schrieb Joe Riel: > > How can I install sun java 1.5 in squeeze? > > It isn't part of the release. > > The package is sun-java5-jre. > > If it is not here, add the repositoey of stable in sources.list. No,

Re: java 5 in squeeze

On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:12:22 -0700 Bob Proulx wrote: > Joe Riel wrote: > > How can I install sun java 1.5 in squeeze? > > It isn't part of the release. > > Java 1.6 is included in the non-free section. > > apt-get install sun-java6-jre > > Useful information about this can be found

Re: java 5 in squeeze

Joe Riel wrote: > How can I install sun java 1.5 in squeeze? > It isn't part of the release. Java 1.6 is included in the non-free section. apt-get install sun-java6-jre Useful information about this can be found on the wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/Java/Sun If you absolutely need Java 1.

Re: java 5 in squeeze

Am Montag, 24. Januar 2011 schrieb Joe Riel: > How can I install sun java 1.5 in squeeze? > It isn't part of the release. The package is sun-java5-jre. If it is not here, add the repositoey of stable in sources.list. Good luck! Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debia

Re: Java Run Time Detection

On 14/11/10 11:43, Angus Hedger wrote: On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 11:13:15 + Alan Chandler wrote: It seems strange to ask this now, at the end of the season, but my wife has suddenly needs use of my windows machine which I previously used for this purpose. This url points to the live timing of F

Re: Java Run Time Detection

On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 11:13:15 +, Alan Chandler wrote: > It seems strange to ask this now, at the end of the season, but my wife > has suddenly needs use of my windows machine which I previously used for > this purpose. > > This url points to the live timing of Formula 1 races > > http://www.f

Re: Java Run Time Detection

On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 11:13:15 + Alan Chandler wrote: > It seems strange to ask this now, at the end of the season, but my > wife has suddenly needs use of my windows machine which I previously > used for this purpose. > > This url points to the live timing of Formula 1 races > > http://www.f

Re: Java Run Time Detection

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 11:13:15AM +, Alan Chandler wrote: > It seems strange to ask this now, at the end of the season, but my > wife has suddenly needs use of my windows machine which I previously > used for this purpose. > > This url points to the live timing of Formula 1 races > > http://

Re: Java applications and font size

On Sun, 08 Aug 2010 00:50:36 +0200, Andreas Goesele wrote: > Camaleón writes: > >> Have you checked (inside the java app) for a setting to define the >> interface layout to use in the program? >> >> I can select from various flavours, each of one using different fonts: >> >> [x] System native (wh

Re: Java applications and font size

Camaleón writes: > Have you checked (inside the java app) for a setting to define the > interface layout to use in the program? > > I can select from various flavours, each of one using different fonts: > > [x] System native (which seems to use the same font type and size as the > other desktop

Re: Java applications and font size

On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:45:25 +0200, Andreas Goesele wrote: > after I switched to 1280x1024 as resolution fonts in Java-Applications > are too small for me. Have you checked (inside the java app) for a setting to define the interface layout to use in the program? I can select from various flavou

Re: JAVA installation

2010/6/22 J.Hwan.Kim > > Hi, everyone > > I'm trying to install java JDK and JRE. > I downloaded JDK(jdk-6u20-linux-i586.bin) and JRE > (jre-6u20-linux-i586.bin)frome java.sun.com > I commanded as follows but error occurred, so I could not make *.deb package > of JDK and JRE. > Helo, I use the n

Re: JAVA installation

> > Hi, everyone > > I'm trying to install java JDK and JRE. > I downloaded JDK(jdk-6u20-linux-i586.bin) and JRE > (jre-6u20-linux-i586.bin)frome java.sun.com > I commanded as follows but error occurred, so I could not make *.deb > package of JDK and JRE. > > > f...@frog1120:~/Electronics/JAVA/JR

Re: JAVA installation

On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:30:08 +0900, J.Hwan.Kim wrote: > I'm trying to install java JDK and JRE. I downloaded > JDK(jdk-6u20-linux-i586.bin) and JRE (jre-6u20-linux-i586.bin)frome > java.sun.com I commanded as follows but error occurred, so I could not > make *.deb package of JDK and JRE. > > > f

Re: Java in Debian testing

On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:30:31 +0330, Nima Azarbayjany wrote: > I used to install sun-java6-bin package in Debian Lenny and then easily > run Java applications by clicking on jar files in Gnome. I have now > installed Debian Squeeze with KDE as the default desktop environment. I > have installed t

Re: Java plugins in 64bit Debian

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 04:26:35PM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote: > On 2010-01-11 at 16:04:26 -0500, Alex Samad wrote: > > I am not arguing that, and I agree with what you have said about them > > making it free. > > > > The issue is the icedtea plugin is touted as a replacement for the sun > > plug

Re: Java plugins in 64bit Debian

On 2010-01-11 at 16:04:26 -0500, Alex Samad wrote: > I am not arguing that, and I agree with what you have said about them > making it free. > > The issue is the icedtea plugin is touted as a replacement for the sun > plugin, and it clearly doesn't work properly I hear you. Of course, there is

Re: Java plugins in 64bit Debian

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:56:13PM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote: > On 2010-01-11 at 15:32:54 -0500, Alex Samad wrote: > > for some reason we (the user of debian) are being pushed to use icedtea > > and its java plugin, I don't have a problem with this except for the > > fact that the plugin isn't a

Re: Java plugins in 64bit Debian

On 2010-01-11 at 15:32:54 -0500, Alex Samad wrote: > for some reason we (the user of debian) are being pushed to use icedtea > and its java plugin, I don't have a problem with this except for the > fact that the plugin isn't a drop in replacement for the sun plugin, but > its turning into a grin an

Re: Java plugins in 64bit Debian

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:00:14AM +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > > I installed a Debian Lenny (amd64), and sun-jdk in addition to the > default gcj based default Java. > > When I access Java content with Firefox (or is IceWeasel) the browsed > prompts me to install JDK... Clicking the prompt s

Re: Java plugins in 64bit Debian

On 11.1.2010 11:12, Camale�n wrote: > > So maybe you are missing the "sun-java6-plugin" package. > Thanks, Java works now in the browser! -- http://www.iki.fi/jarif/ Your life would be very empty if you had nothing to regret. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Java plugins in 64bit Debian

> > So maybe you are missing the "sun-java6-plugin" package. > > Greetings, > > -- > Camaleón > Thanks, works now! That was it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Java plugins in 64bit Debian

On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:00:14 +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote: > I installed a Debian Lenny (amd64), and sun-jdk in addition to the > default gcj based default Java. > > When I access Java content with Firefox (or is IceWeasel) the browsed > prompts me to install JDK... Clicking the prompt shows Sun

Re: Java and firefox

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:20:52 -0500 Frank McCormick wrote: > Any Java experts here ? My Firefox (3.5.5) has started to throw > java errors complaining about not being able to find the main class. > I reinstalled sun-java-bin from the repositories but

Re: Java Runtime Enviroment missing

On 2009-12-13, Nick Douma wrote: > > On 13-12-2009 14:55, pch0317 wrote: >> Hi >> In Iceveasel, page bar apperar that ''Additional plugins are required to >> display all the media on this page''. I have to install Java Runtime >> Enviroment. Which open-source packet I have to install to run page >

Re: Java Runtime Enviroment missing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13-12-2009 14:55, pch0317 wrote: > Hi > In Iceveasel, page bar apperar that ''Additional plugins are required to > display all the media on this page''. I have to install Java Runtime > Enviroment. Which open-source packet I have to install to run p

Re: java / iceweasel

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:10:50PM +, Camaleón wrote: > El Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:09:31 +0100, Roy Stuivenberg escribió: > > > After spending a whole evening trying to get java to work with iceweasel > > .. > > > > Help appreciated to get the job done. > > > > My last attempt was this one : > >

Re: java / iceweasel

El Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:59:57 +0100, Roy Stuivenberg escribió: > Camaleón, > > I reinstalled sun-6-java .. and now it's working. First time I installed > using aptitude, and get stuck with the license agreement .. after fixing > broken with synaptic manager, it didn't work, so I think it was the >

Re: java / iceweasel

Camaleón, I reinstalled sun-6-java .. and now it's working. First time I installed using aptitude, and get stuck with the license agreement .. after fixing broken with synaptic manager, it didn't work, so I think it was the license agreement, that did not pass. Thanks for the help. Kind regards,

Re: java / iceweasel - about:plugins - java test

Hi Camaleón This is the result of about:plugins. Geïnstalleerde plug-ins Vind meer informatie over browserplug-ins op mozilla.org. Hulp bij het installeren van plug-ins is beschikbaar op plugindoc.mozdev.org. Shockwave Flas

Re: java / iceweasel

El Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:20:35 +0100, Roy Stuivenberg escribió: > Camaleon, > > In this case, I think the question would be how to make the symbolic > link java-6-sun / iceweasel It should done automatically, once you run "update-alternatives" and choose the Sun's one. Can you please post the re

Re: java / iceweasel

Camaleon, In this case, I think the question would be how to make the symbolic link java-6-sun / iceweasel Regards, Roy. Op maandag 16-11-2009 om 12:10 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Camaleón: > update-alternatives --config java -- _ _ooOoo_

Re: java / iceweasel

Wish that was true ;) SelectieAlternatieven --- 1/usr/bin/gij-4.3 +2/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/jre/bin/java * 3/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun/jre/bin/java Op maandag 16-11-2009 om 12:10 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Camal

Re: java / iceweasel

El Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:10:50 +, Camaleón escribió: (...) > Just install "sun-java6-jre" and run "update-alternatives --config java" > to select the default java path. Then you're done :-) You send the message to my direct mail :-) *** Wish that was true ;) SelectieAlternatieven

Re: java / iceweasel

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:09:31PM +0100, Roy Stuivenberg wrote: > After spending a whole evening trying to get java to work with > iceweasel .. I gave up on the Sun packages, too. The icedtea plugin works for me, though, and is reasonably compatible with most Java applets--not all,but most. --

Re: java / iceweasel

El Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:09:31 +0100, Roy Stuivenberg escribió: > After spending a whole evening trying to get java to work with iceweasel > .. > > Help appreciated to get the job done. > > My last attempt was this one : >> http://www.rsreese.com/2009/05/installing-sun-java-on-debian-lenny.html >>

Re: java-gcj installation bug

On Sunday 12 July 2009 16:16:07 David Baron wrote: > Setting up java-gcj-compat-headless (1.0.80-5.1) ... > update-alternatives: error: alternative rmiregistry can't be master: it is > a slave of java > dpkg: error processing java-gcj-compat-headless (--configure): > subprocess installed post-inst

Re: java-gcj installation bug

On Sunday 12 July 2009 16:16:07 David Baron wrote: > Setting up java-gcj-compat-headless (1.0.80-5.1) ... > update-alternatives: error: alternative rmiregistry can't be master: it is > a slave of java > dpkg: error processing java-gcj-compat-headless (--configure): > subprocess installed post-inst

Re: Java lib packages

On Thursday 02 July 2009, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In <4fe4c4f50907021347r2fcba2dcqa1b0ca7e2db79...@mail.gmail.com>, ChadDavis > > wrote: > >> In any case, the lib*-java packages are not specifically for developers. > >> They are shared dependencies of the Java applications that are part of

Re: Java lib packages

In <4fe4c4f50907021347r2fcba2dcqa1b0ca7e2db79...@mail.gmail.com>, ChadDavis wrote: >> In any case, the lib*-java packages are not specifically for developers. >> They are shared dependencies of the Java applications that are part of >> Debian or are using the Debian build and distribution network

Re: Java lib packages

n't really favor one language over another at runtime. > > In any case, the lib*-java packages are not specifically for developers. > They are shared dependencies of the Java applications that are part of > Debian or are using the Debian build and distribution network (contrib/non- > free).  Java a

Re: Java lib packages

In <4fe4c4f50907021215o423b69cdyceea0dd78506d...@mail.gmail.com>, ChadDavis wrote: >On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith >Jr. wrote: >> In <4fe4c4f50907021030n40b776b8h9a09ce64ecec9...@mail.gmail.com>, >> ChadDavis >> >> wrote: >>>I would be interested in >>>hearing how people doing

Re: Java lib packages

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In <4fe4c4f50907021030n40b776b8h9a09ce64ecec9...@mail.gmail.com>, ChadDavis > wrote: >>I would be interested in >>hearing how people doing Java development make use of the Debian >>shared Java libraries. > > I don't think it is much (i

Re: Java lib packages

In <4fe4c4f50907021030n40b776b8h9a09ce64ecec9...@mail.gmail.com>, ChadDavis wrote: >I would be interested in >hearing how people doing Java development make use of the Debian >shared Java libraries. I don't think it is much (if any) different from a C developer making use of the Debian shared C

Re: Java lib packages

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In <4fe4c4f50907020939v7039d33ej8056970848e03...@mail.gmail.com>, ChadDavis > wrote: >>When I'm using >>an advanced project tool, like Maven, all of these Java "libraries" >>are managed for me -- they are all kept in a local repositor

Re: Java lib packages

In <4fe4c4f50907020939v7039d33ej8056970848e03...@mail.gmail.com>, ChadDavis wrote: >When I'm using >an advanced project tool, like Maven, all of these Java "libraries" >are managed for me -- they are all kept in a local repository to >eliminate all of the maintenance issues associated with managin

Re: java applets

Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 14:18 +0200, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: > If everything else fails: > - Purge all JRE > See: aptitude search "?and(~Pjava-runtime,~i)" > - Purge iceweasel > - Reinstall iceweasel > - Reinstall sun-java6-plugin > - Create a new user account > - Test

Re: java applets

On Sun, 2009-06-28 at 14:18 +0200, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: > Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > > > Can you list the plugins in iceweasel, typically, with the _one_line_ > > command: > > > > find /usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins/ -name *.so \ ^^^ Do you actually use

Re: java applets

Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > Can you list the plugins in iceweasel, typically, with the _one_line_ > command: > > find /usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins/ -name *.so \ > | xargs -n 1 readlink -m | xargs dpkg -S > This gives: sun-java5-bin: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0.18/jre/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavapl

Re: java

Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 08:50:36AM +0100, thveillon.debian wrote: > >> I don't remember if I had to update the alternatives manually, I don't >> think so. >> [...] >> update-alternatives --config iceweasel-javaplugin.so > > That's what I'm saying: there's no option for it.

Re: java

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 08:50:36AM +0100, thveillon.debian wrote: > I don't remember if I had to update the alternatives manually, I don't > think so. > [...] > update-alternatives --config iceweasel-javaplugin.so That's what I'm saying: there's no option for it. $ sudo update-alternatives -

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >