Re: mail server

2012-07-31 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Camaleón wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 20:21:53 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Camaleón wrote: > > (...) > since we fetch the email via pop and sent via smtp the problem is i need to make backup of individual PST.

Re: mail server

2012-07-30 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 20:21:53 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Camaleón wrote: (...) >>> since we fetch the email via pop and sent via smtp the problem is i >>> need to make backup of individual PST. >> >> What? I don't get this... you mean you need to migrat

Re: mail server

2012-07-29 Thread Joe
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 20:21:53 +0500 Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > > ok our 20 users fetching their emails from our hosted server. which is > maintained by our service provider. and we are keeping 3 months of > emails on our mail server and in case of email lost we can not recover > it since we ha

Re: mail server

2012-07-29 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Camaleón wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 00:52:48 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Camaleón wrote: >>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:01:09 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: >>> actually i have spent 3 years working with Mailer d

Re: mail server

2012-07-29 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 00:52:48 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Camaleón wrote: >> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:01:09 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: >> >>> actually i have spent 3 years working with Mailer daemon v7.0 so when >>> ever some one say a name "mail ser

Re: mail server

2012-07-28 Thread Chris Bannister
[Please trim your posts.] On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:53:19PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > is there any good howto on Debian Squeeze on following tools Google is your friend. It also corrects spelling mistakes. :) > -postfidx Web Results 1 - 10 of about 276,000 for +squeeze +postfidx +ho

Re: Re: mail server

2012-07-28 Thread Clive Standbridge
> > is there any good howto on Debian Squeeze on following tools > > -postfidx > -dovecot > -postfixadmin (web interface) > -roundcube > -spamassassin > -clamv Most of that list is covered by the tutorials at http://workaround.org/ispmail/ I have used the tutorial for Debian Lenny and found it

Re: mail server

2012-07-28 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Camaleón wrote: > On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:01:09 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > >> actually i have spent 3 years working with Mailer daemon v7.0 so when >> ever some one say a name "mail server" unintentionally mailer daemon >> comes in my mind. this is my firs

Re: mail server

2012-07-28 Thread Camaleón
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:01:09 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > actually i have spent 3 years working with Mailer daemon v7.0 so when > ever some one say a name "mail server" unintentionally mailer daemon > comes in my mind. this is my first time that i am implementing MTA on > linux.since i hav

Re: mail server

2012-07-28 Thread Brad Alexander
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > thanks, good example. if i say ISPs which provide SMTP relay. are > using MTA where they dont want to store emails (unlike i have to do in > office) rather just relay all the messages to destination. Correct? Generally correct, thoug

Re: mail server

2012-07-28 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Brad Alexander wrote: > On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan > wrote: > >> -postfidx >> -dovecot >> -postfixadmin (web interface) >> -roundcube >> -spamassassin >> -clamv >> >> btw i have a question in my mind . postfix is mail server. but the >>

Re: mail server

2012-07-28 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
actually i have spent 3 years working with Mailer daemon v7.0 so when ever some one say a name "mail server" unintentionally mailer daemon comes in my mind. this is my first time that i am implementing MTA on linux.since i have just started to shift from Microsoft to Linux. there is lot to learn.

Re: mail server

2012-07-28 Thread Brad Alexander
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > -postfidx > -dovecot > -postfixadmin (web interface) > -roundcube > -spamassassin > -clamv > > btw i have a question in my mind . postfix is mail server. but the > question raising in my mind if postfix is the complete server then why

Re: mail server

2012-07-28 Thread Jochen Spieker
Muhammad Yousuf Khan: > > btw i have a question in my mind . postfix is mail server. but the > question raising in my mind if postfix is the complete server then why > we have to add several other tools like mentioned above > (dovecot,spamassassin etc) ? When Unix/Linux people talk about mail ser

Re: mail server

2012-07-28 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Sb, 28 iul 12, 12:53:19, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > > is there any good howto on Debian Squeeze on following tools > > -postfidx > -dovecot > -postfixadmin (web interface) > -roundcube > -spamassassin > -clamv > > btw i have a question in my mind . postfix is mail server. but the > questio

Re: mail server

2012-07-28 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Brad Alexander wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:20 AM, J. B wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 19:58:39 +0800 >> Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: >> >>> 2012/7/25 Muhammad Yousuf Khan : >>> > need suggestions, i know there are few populer mail servers like >>> > postfix, san

Re: mail server

2012-07-27 Thread Brad Alexander
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:20 AM, J. B wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 19:58:39 +0800 > Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > >> 2012/7/25 Muhammad Yousuf Khan : >> > need suggestions, i know there are few populer mail servers like >> > postfix, sandmail etc out there. >> > >> > here is some details about my off

Re: mail server

2012-07-26 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Jo, 26 iul 12, 10:17:38, Denis Witt wrote: > On 25.07.2012 22:14, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > > >Thanks for letting me know these matters but i am not using it > >publicly i will be downloading my emails from my hosted mail server. > > Then you will have to add a tool like "fetchmail" to you

Re: mail server

2012-07-26 Thread Denis Witt
On 26.07.2012 16:25, Camaleón wrote: how you perform basic tasks like mail-ques checking, logs, mail box create, delete, mail restriction .etc.? IIRC, last time I checked years ago, there were some GUI based frontends to perform the usual operations with Cyrus and Postfix (and also webmin

Re: mail server

2012-07-26 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 01:17:15 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Camaleón wrote: >> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:52:25 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: >> >>> need suggestions, i know there are few populer mail servers like >>> postfix, sandmail etc out there. (...)

Re: mail server

2012-07-26 Thread Denis Witt
On 25.07.2012 22:17, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: how you perform basic tasks like mail-ques checking, logs, mail box create, delete, mail restriction .etc.? With postfix there is the command "postqueue" which will show you the current queue. With the "postsuper" command you can delete Mai

Re: mail server

2012-07-26 Thread Denis Witt
On 25.07.2012 22:14, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: Thanks for letting me know these matters but i am not using it publicly i will be downloading my emails from my hosted mail server. Then you will have to add a tool like "fetchmail" to your list to download the mails and put them into the local

Re: mail server

2012-07-25 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Camaleón wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:52:25 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > >> need suggestions, i know there are few populer mail servers like >> postfix, sandmail etc out there. >> >> here is some details about my office. >> >> 1. 20 users. >> 2. pop from

Re: mail server

2012-07-25 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Denis Witt wrote: > On 25.07.2012 13:52, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > >> here is some details about my office. > > >> 1. 20 users. >> 2. pop from main server >> 3. send via SMTP >> 4. local mail distribution IMAP > > >> i am not looking in to easy or hard mail ser

Re: mail server

2012-07-25 Thread Muhammad Yousuf Khan
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:21 PM, ew wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > >> need suggestions, i know there are few populer mail servers like >> postfix, sandmail etc out there. >> >> here is some details about my office. >> >> 1. 20 users. >> 2. pop from main serve

Re: mail server

2012-07-25 Thread Camaleón
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:52:25 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > need suggestions, i know there are few populer mail servers like > postfix, sandmail etc out there. > > here is some details about my office. > > 1. 20 users. > 2. pop from main server > 3. send via SMTP > 4. local mail distributio

Re: mail server

2012-07-25 Thread Denis Witt
On 25.07.2012 13:52, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: here is some details about my office. 1. 20 users. 2. pop from main server 3. send via SMTP 4. local mail distribution IMAP i am not looking in to easy or hard mail server. what i am looking is it should be good for my carrier and for my of

Re: mail server

2012-07-25 Thread ew
On Jul 25, 2012, at 7:52 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > need suggestions, i know there are few populer mail servers like > postfix, sandmail etc out there. > > here is some details about my office. > > 1. 20 users. > 2. pop from main server > 3. send via SMTP > 4. local mail distribution IMA

Re: mail server

2012-07-25 Thread J. B
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 19:58:39 +0800 Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > 2012/7/25 Muhammad Yousuf Khan : > > need suggestions, i know there are few populer mail servers like > > postfix, sandmail etc out there. > > > > here is some details about my office. > > > > 1. 20 users. > > 2. pop from main server >

Re: mail server

2012-07-25 Thread Umarzuki Mochlis
2012/7/25 Muhammad Yousuf Khan : > need suggestions, i know there are few populer mail servers like > postfix, sandmail etc out there. > > here is some details about my office. > > 1. 20 users. > 2. pop from main server > 3. send via SMTP > 4. local mail distribution IMAP > > i am not looking in to

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-11-02 Thread lee
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:10:10AM +0530, Abdullah wrote: > I want to setup a mailserver on a debian machine. please help me as i have > not got a perfect answer by googling. > I wuld like to use squirrelmail. please help. First set up a nameserver, see /usr/share/doc/HOWTO/en-txt/DNS-HOWTO.gz. In

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-11-01 Thread Abdullah
I want to setup a mailserver on a debian machine. please help me as i have not got a perfect answer by googling. I wuld like to use squirrelmail. please help. On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote: > > I like Postfix and Dovecot

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-27 Thread Rod James Bio
Postfix + Cyrus + SASL for simple users. You can add spamassassin + pyzor/rzor & config your SASL to use LDAP or other auth method. For me postfix + cyrus is just a better combi. On Wednesday, 27 October, 2010 04:13 PM, Alan Chandler wrote: On 26/10/10 13:20, Carlos Mennens wrote: On Tue, Oct

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-27 Thread Alan Chandler
On 26/10/10 13:20, Carlos Mennens wrote: On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote: I like Postfix and Dovecot :-) I think Postfix is the best open source MTA available on Linux hands down. I have used Sendmail, Qmail, and Exim and none of them have given me the flexability and security

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-26 Thread Joe
On 26/10/10 12:10, B. Alexander wrote: Hi all, I figured I would ask for a sanity check here. I'm looking to replace my internal mail server. Right now, I'm running Zimbra 5.0.x, but I have always run on the low end of the hardware requirements, and now, the box I am running on (2.4 GHz P4, 1GB

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-26 Thread Andreas Weber
On 2010-10-26 16:42, Camaleón wrote: > Users like many things (i.e., Hotmail/Livemail :-P) but and admin has > also to care about another things (server requirements, performance, > stability and security). It's stable, since years and with many concurrent users. And the support efforts for expl

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-26 Thread Michal
On 26/10/10 13:21, Carlos Mennens wrote: On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:18 AM, B. Alexander wrote: I had considered squirrel, but I'm not in love with the interface. It's dated in appearance and the lack of a back end database is what killed it for me. You can connect squirrellmail to sql. You s

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-26 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:14:11 +0200, Andreas Weber wrote: > On 2010-10-26 14:13, Camaleón wrote: >>> * spamassassin (in case I ever decide to work around the port 25 >>> block) > > spampd is your friend. AFAIK, "spamd" comes within SA. >>> * roundcube for webmail >> As an alternative to Roundcu

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-26 Thread Andreas Weber
On 2010-10-26 14:13, Camaleón wrote: >> * spamassassin (in case I ever decide to work around the port 25 block) spampd is your friend. >> * roundcube for webmail > As an alternative to Roundcube (I avoid webmail as much as I can) I would > take a look into Squirrel. RoundCube is simply great. A

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-26 Thread Michal
I think that any modern, inexpensive system (dual- or quad-core AMD CPUs running around 3GHz, 4GB RAM) would fit the bill. OP didnt say how many users would be using it, but it doesn't sound like many considering his existing box. Postfix with things like clamav, spamassiain, webmail, mysql

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-26 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:18:41 -0400, B. Alexander wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote: > >> I like Postfix and Dovecot :-) >> >> Spamassassin is resource (ram/cpu) consuming and provided that you are >> not going online (no spam) it could be omitted. >> >> As an alternative to

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-26 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
On Ter, 26 Out 2010, "B. Alexander" wrote: * roundcube for webmail You could try IMP, part of the Horde suite for e-mail. It's only slightly less ugly than SquirrelMail, but it is extremely powerful feature-wise. -- Use at own risk. Eduardo M KALINOWSKI edua...@kalinowski.com.br -- To

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-26 Thread olafrv
Hi, I use dovecot, postfix, assp, openfire e egroupware. I'm looking a better webclient like zimbra, but for the backend the is no better over hw efficiency. All this solutions uses ldap as backend for users. Regards.- "You don't know where your shadow will fall", Somebody.-

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-26 Thread B. Alexander
I don't mind keeping my mail in a flat file rather than a db. I guess if I were doing higher volume stuff, it might make a difference, but most of the emails I deal with are read, deal with and delete. On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Carlos Mennens wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camal

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-26 Thread Carlos Mennens
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:18 AM, B. Alexander wrote: > I had considered squirrel, but I'm not in love with the interface. It's dated in appearance and the lack of a back end database is what killed it for me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-26 Thread Carlos Mennens
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote: > I like Postfix and Dovecot :-) I think Postfix is the best open source MTA available on Linux hands down. I have used Sendmail, Qmail, and Exim and none of them have given me the flexability and security of Postfix. Not to mention it's the easies

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-26 Thread B. Alexander
I had considered squirrel, but I'm not in love with the interface. On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Camaleón wrote: > On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:10:33 -0400, B. Alexander wrote: > > (...) > > > Now the mail server, since Comcast blocked port 25, is mainly used for > > internal monitor/security messa

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-26 Thread Camaleón
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:10:33 -0400, B. Alexander wrote: (...) > Now the mail server, since Comcast blocked port 25, is mainly used for > internal monitor/security messages, like ossec and opsview, apticron > messages, etc. So I was looking to set up an OpenVZ container, probably > sid, as a mails

Re: Mail server recommendations

2010-10-26 Thread Ron Johnson
On 10/26/2010 06:10 AM, B. Alexander wrote: Hi all, I figured I would ask for a sanity check here. I'm looking to replace my internal mail server. Right now, I'm running Zimbra 5.0.x, but I have always run on the low end of the hardware requirements, and now, the box I am running on (2.4 GHz P4,

Re: Mail server recommendation

2009-09-04 Thread Michael Ekstrand
Jesus arteche wrote: > I have to build a mail server in my enterprise, what the solutions do > you recomend zimbra, Qmail, Postfix... I've had good success with Postfix (SMTP) + Dovecot (IMAP/POP3) + SpamAssassin (spam filtering) on my personal server, using Dovecot's deliver with the Sieve plugin

Re: Mail server recommendation

2009-09-04 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2009-09-04 11:02:57, schrieb Jesus arteche: > Hey, > > I have to build a mail server in my enterprise, what the solutions do you > recomend zimbra, Qmail, Postfix... Supporting only SMTP or IMAP too? I suggest you to use the courier suite because it is secure from scratch and it just works if

Re: Mail server recommendation

2009-09-04 Thread frank
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 11:02 +0200, Jesus arteche wrote: > I have to build a mail server in my enterprise, what the solutions do > you recomend zimbra, Qmail, Postfix... Depends on your needs. I like sendmail, postfix and qmail (the bad, the weird and the ugly ;) Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Mail server recommendation

2009-09-04 Thread Jochen Schulz
Jesus arteche: > > I have to build a mail server in my enterprise, what the solutions do you > recomend zimbra, Qmail, Postfix... What exactly do you need? If all you need is an MTA, I propose Postfix or Exim. But since you brought Zimbra into play I suspect you need more than plain mail delivery

Re: Mail server recommendation

2009-09-04 Thread Florian Kriener
On Friday 04 September 2009 11:02:57 Jesus arteche wrote: > I have to build a mail server in my enterprise, what the solutions do > you recomend zimbra, Qmail, Postfix... I had good experiences with Postfix and bad experiences with Qmail and I don't like Sendmail. But it boils down to this: What

Re: Mail server recommendation

2009-09-04 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Jesus arteche wrote: Hey, I have to build a mail server in my enterprise, what the solutions do you recomend zimbra, Qmail, Postfix... exim ? Thanks -- Jerome BENOIT jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "un

Re: mail server for offline system

2007-06-26 Thread Owen Heisler
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 09:57:49AM -0400, Celejar wrote: On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:40:04 +0100 Hans du Plooy wrote: Owen Heisler wrote: Postfix, exim4, or any other decent mail server in Deiban that (preferrably) can be configured easily with will suffice. The server must support Maildir folders,

Re: mail server for offline system

2007-06-25 Thread Celejar
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:40:04 +0100 Hans du Plooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Owen Heisler wrote: > > Postfix, exim4, or any other decent mail server in Deiban that > > (preferrably) can be configured easily with will suffice. The server > > must support Maildir folders, honor the ~/.forward file

Re: mail server for offline system

2007-06-24 Thread Hans du Plooy
Owen Heisler wrote: Postfix, exim4, or any other decent mail server in Deiban that (preferrably) can be configured easily with will suffice. The server must support Maildir folders, honor the ~/.forward file (perhaps they all do?), and not attempt to deliver non-local messages when a specified i

Re: mail server

2006-10-23 Thread David Clymer
Please remember to reply to the list so that everyone can benefit from our discussion of the issue. On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 01:34 -0700, George Adamides wrote: > You are right by question is too broad and I apologize for that. Well > basically I installed xoops (a content management system > www.xo

Re: mail server

2006-10-21 Thread johnmasters
> On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 00:11 -0700, George Adamides wrote: >> hello >> how do i setup a mail server in debian? >> > > That's a pretty broad question. Please read the following: > > http://www.mikeash.com/getting_answers.html > Also, if you're in a hurry and can't be bothered, try following this li

Re: mail server

2006-10-21 Thread David Clymer
On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 00:11 -0700, George Adamides wrote: > hello > how do i setup a mail server in debian? > That's a pretty broad question. Please read the following: http://www.mikeash.com/getting_answers.html Debian comes with a mail server installed. Perhaps you could explain what you are

Re: mail server

2006-10-20 Thread Kevin Mark
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:58:22AM -0700, George Adamides wrote: > hi and thanks for the reply. which one would you suggest? > > - Original Message > From: Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 10:37:2

Re: mail server

2006-10-20 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/20/06 02:11, George Adamides wrote: > hello > how do i setup a mail server in debian? exim is already installed my default. Is this a departmental mail server, or what? - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Is "common sense" really valid?

Re: mail server

2006-10-20 Thread Kevin Mark
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 12:11:23AM -0700, George Adamides wrote: > hello > how do i setup a mail server in debian? Hi George, first you determine which one you want to install then you attempt to install it with 'apt-get' or 'aptitude' then when you have errors or questions, you ask here. Kev -- |

Re: Mail server setup

2006-04-09 Thread 'Clive Menzies'
Hi Asif On (09/04/06 16:09), Asif wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > I appreciate your comments and the help given so far. > > I've been working on the configuration today and going by your documentation > and other readme's have got to a further stage than I have ever done. > > I've installe

Re: mail server replacement for qmail/vpopmail

2005-09-28 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 05:54:10PM +0300, Haim Ashkenazi wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to find replacement for qmail/vpopmail (that is, mail server > with virtual domains and non-system users). the reason I'm doing that is > that I'm installing many servers with this configuration, and doing it > fro

Re: mail server

2005-07-08 Thread Craig Russell
The license for qmail prohibits the distribution of it in binary form except in it's "pure" state. The qmailrocks installation patches the pure qmail source to add additional functionality and thus cannot be distrbuted in binary form. Also, the debian package for courier-auth does not include

Re: mail server

2005-07-03 Thread askar k
Thanks to everybody for information on mail server. Sincerely, askar On 7/2/05, askar k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello. > > Is there step-by-step guide on building a mail server > postfix+spamassassin+clamavd+etc... on the internet? > > thanks, > askar >

Re: mail server

2005-07-02 Thread Robert
Myself, I use ClamAV, Postfix and SpamAssassin here. Just use the defaults that apt-get install sets up and you are all set. apt-get install postfix apt-get install spamassassin apt-get install clamav Note that spamassassin may already be installed since I believe the Debian installer installs s

Re: mail server

2005-07-02 Thread Clive Menzies
On (02/07/05 19:03), Csanyi Pal wrote: > To: Debian User > From: Csanyi Pal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 19:03:42 +0200 > Subject: Re: mail server > > On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 01:13:12PM -0400, Craig Russell wrote: > > > > askar k wrote: >

Re: mail server

2005-07-02 Thread peter colton
On Saturday 02 July 2005 17:32, askar k wrote: > Hello. > > Is there step-by-step guide on building a mail server > postfix+spamassassin+clamavd+etc... on the internet? > > thanks, > askar hello askar, Here is a link for postfix and mysql http://workaround.org/articles/i

Re: mail server

2005-07-02 Thread Csanyi Pal
On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 01:13:12PM -0400, Craig Russell wrote: > > askar k wrote: > > >Is there step-by-step guide on building a mail server > >postfix+spamassassin+clamavd+etc... on the internet? And is there a step-by-step guide on building a mail server using exim4? -- Regards, Paul ->->-

Re: mail server

2005-07-02 Thread Anders Breindahl
On Saturday 02 July 2005 18:32, askar k wrote: > Is there step-by-step guide on building a mail server > postfix+spamassassin+clamavd+etc... on the internet? http://workaround.org/articles/ispmail-sarge/ Regards, Anders Breindahl. pgpqMRVA1CVfO.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: mail server

2005-07-02 Thread Craig Russell
askar k wrote: Hello. Is there step-by-step guide on building a mail server postfix+spamassassin+clamavd+etc... on the internet? thanks, askar I don't know about one for postifx but the qmailrocks website has step by step instructions as well as a very active mailing list that is ext

Re: Mail Server Questions

2004-10-23 Thread Joe
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Phil Bardanes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes Arias, Thanks for your reply and thanks for laying it out in an easy-to-understand manner. I'll try it out! The current default mail server for Debian is exim4, though you can use others. As stated already, there are several

Re: Mail Server Questions

2004-10-23 Thread Phil Bardanes
Arias, Thanks for your reply and thanks for laying it out in an easy-to-understand manner. I'll try it out! PB On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 15:40, Arias Hung wrote: > On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Phil Bardanes wrote: > > > Hi, noob here. > > > > We have five machines running various OSes (only one Windows b

Re: Mail Server Questions

2004-10-22 Thread Arias Hung
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Phil Bardanes wrote: > Hi, noob here. > > We have five machines running various OSes (only one Windows box) with a > Debian sarge business server on our private network. Everything is run > through a dedicated firewall using iptables rules for NAT, packet > filtering, port f

Re: Mail server in DMZ

2004-09-24 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:20:08 +0200, Curtis Vaughan wrote: > Behind it, we have 1 Postfix server w/Courier IMAP and 1 Exchange 5.5 > Server (soon to be moved to another Postfix server). I dunno what IPCop is, but I have postfix and Courier-IMAP in the DMZ. > 2) accept all incoming mail and only

Re: mail server changing machines

2004-06-04 Thread Lucas Albers
I dealt with this problem recently, my mail server had one of it's raid disks failed. I had to move it to another machine. While I powered the machine off to put in a new disk. I didn't want the downtime required for the reboot and putting in the new disk. I use the vserver project to use virtual

Re: mail server changing machines

2004-06-04 Thread Alvin Oga
hi ya On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Nick Smith wrote: > im going to be moving my mail server to another machine, and moving it off > site at another location (more bandwidth). what would the easiest way and > least down time way of doing that? i have the other machine already > installed debian and updat

RE: mail server changing machines

2004-06-04 Thread Michael Martinell
For what it's worth this is how I did it: Since I only had 100 users I added them new. If you have more users you will want to script this. Then I copied the contents of the squirrelmail data directory to my new machine. Since I already had samba on both boxes I then copied the /home directory fr

Re: Mail server for small business

2004-04-17 Thread Uwe Dippel
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:35:24 -0400, David Clymer wrote: > fetchmail+(exim|postfix)+(cyrus|courier-imapd|courier-popd|teapop) can > do all that you have mentioned. Have you given these packages a look? > > You may have some trouble fetching mail from yahoo, hotmail, et al, > unless they provide p

Re: Mail server for small business

2004-04-16 Thread David Clymer
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 16:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I maintain a lot of small businesses that are not large enough to have > their own mail server hosted internally. I would like to have a mail > server that runs internally and fetches the mail from the providers and > then host it locally.

Re: Mail server for small business

2004-04-16 Thread Adam Aube
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I maintain a lot of small businesses that are not large enough to have > their own mail server hosted internally. I would like to have a mail > server that runs internally and fetches the mail from the providers and > then host it locally. Look into getmail or fetchmai

Re: Mail Server Design - ez

2004-04-16 Thread Alvin Oga
On 16 Apr 2004, Mariano Wahlmann wrote: > I need some help, on designing a mail server solution (structure), my > request are: > > -Users 4000+ aprox. with a growth rate of 20/users by month. > -Each user has 15Mb of inbox. > -Accesible by POP3 / IMAP (Only for Webmail who resides in other serv

Re: Mail Server Design

2004-04-16 Thread Adam Aube
Mariano Wahlmann wrote: > do you have any clue? about what is the propper File System for mail > storage server (by performance). Ext3, Ext2, ReiserFS, etc etc. Any stable journalling filesystem will work fine. The biggest performance issue will likely be the speed of your disks. I would suggest

Re: Mail Server Design

2004-04-16 Thread Mariano Wahlmann
do you have any clue? about what is the propper File System for mail storage server (by performance). Ext3, Ext2, ReiserFS, etc etc. On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 10:59, Adam Aube wrote: > Mariano Wahlmann wrote: > > > I need some help, on designing a mail server solution (structure) > > > I have two p

Re: Mail Server Design

2004-04-16 Thread Adam Aube
Mariano Wahlmann wrote: > I need some help, on designing a mail server solution (structure) > I have two proposal: > > 1- One big expensive server with 1 SCSI disk, two processors. > 2- Several cheaps servers, dividing mailboxes across servers. I would say go with (2). This system would have 3

Re: Mail Server Design

2004-04-16 Thread Mariano Wahlmann
My backup strategy, is every day at 3AM, y make a tar of /var/spool/mail. and passes to another server. There is no need of having mirrors, because users knows that mail server could crash, and i will be restore on 4 hours. I make Spam filtering / AV checks, on other SMTP server, and then it passes

Re: Mail Server Design

2004-04-16 Thread Rory Campbell-Lange
A couple of comments: What is your backup strategy? On the physical hardware side you may wish to look into supporting a redundant disk over RAID for at least the single server approach, to help deal with the inevitable disk crash :). If you want to mirror numbers of other servers for backup purpo

Re: Mail Server Design

2004-04-16 Thread Nicos Gollan
On 16 Apr 2004 09:16:11 -0300 Mariano Wahlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need some help, on designing a mail server solution (structure), my > request are: > > -Users 4000+ aprox. with a growth rate of 20/users by month. > -Each user has 15Mb of inbox. > -Accesible by POP3 / IMAP (Only for W

Re: Mail server load

2004-04-01 Thread Mariano Wahlmann
I think so, but first i want to look for solutions like changing to maildir, did someone try it (mailbox vs. maildir)?, how can i measure IOWAIT, because top command show always 0%. Thanks, On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 04:47, Toens Bueker wrote: > Mariano Wahlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > > Hy,

Re: Mail server load

2004-03-31 Thread Toens Bueker
Mariano Wahlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > Hy, i'm Administrator of an University, and my mail (pop/imap) server > has 5-6 average LA, the machine is an Dual Pentium Xeon of 2.4Ghz, with > 1Gb of RAM, and one UW-SCSI 320 of 36Gb. My domain has 4000 email > accounts, and 5 list of 3000 local user

Re: Mail server

2003-10-12 Thread Paul William
postfix is *supposed* to be better for larger volumes of email. I use exim and in the past have used postfix. Both are good. On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 16:10, ralph bacolod wrote: > I just read the header of an email from this list and > I saw that murphy.Debian.Org uses Postfix. Why is this > so? Why

Re: Mail server

2003-02-25 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2003-02-25T09:34:37Z, Thomas Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, qmail is an I/O hog. We have a (small) list-server at a customer > which was set up with qmail (w/ el-cheapo 20 GB IDE HDDs). Could only send > at ~512 kbit. Then replaced qmail with postfix, now it saturates the > customer's

Re: Mail server

2003-02-25 Thread Thomas Lamy
Russell Coker wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:34, Colin Ellis wrote: > > Email doesn't really need much processing, but does take > > surprisingly large amounts of disk space. > > Obviously such things differ depending on exactly who is > using the service and what they are doing. > > But my

Re: Mail server

2003-02-25 Thread Lacoste (Frisurf)
[disclaimer: I am not a specialist in mail servers at all] I have installed James (check www.apache.org) on one machine and its developers claim, if I remember correctly, to send several millions of mails during their performance testing. I found it really easy to administrate and I am using MySQL

Re: Mail server

2003-02-24 Thread Mike Dresser
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, nate wrote: > Maarten Vink said: > > > I totally agree with Russel; disk speed is probably the most important > > limiting factor, not CPU speed or diskspace. > > my home server is a p3-800 1GB ram, dual 100GB WD special edition(8MB) > drives in raid1, with spamassasin+sanitiz

Re: Mail server

2003-02-24 Thread nate
Maarten Vink said: > I totally agree with Russel; disk speed is probably the most important > limiting factor, not CPU speed or diskspace. if all your doing is email then disk speed is most important, cpu and ram can become very important when running spamassassin, and virus scanning though. my

Re: Mail server and iptables/exim

2003-01-10 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, David P James said: > Nathan E Norman was roused into action on 2003-01-09 22:22 and wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:48:41PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote: > >>Then apparently iptables is DROPping connections to that port - fix that > >>and we'll move from there. > > >

  1   2   3   >