On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:27:52PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> > and if you want to compile them there's always 'apt-get --compile source
> > packagename'. if you haven't used it before here's how it works :)
>
> with the annoying side affect of apt insisting on replacing the
> locally compile
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 12:29:30PM -0800, Adam Shand wrote:
> > If you're really hard core about security and encryption (and I'm going
> > to be heretical here, but hey, I have to plug my home), try OpenBSD.
> > Since it's main repository is in Canada, US crypto laws don't apply. I
> > played w
Title: RE: crypto patch
hesitant to put it in by default. Who knows, maybe some other
distirbution does? Bastille Linux?
[Andrew Weiss]
So would you run this OS on a headless server? :-)
Epitaph for Bill Gates: "This man performed an illegal operation and was shut down"
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --revision just sets an epoch, which is rather evil since it will
> think your package is newwer then ANY upgraded package unless the
> upgraded package has an epoch > yours.
The --revision flag in kernel-package only makes an epoch if you
explicitl
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > I guess ultimately, what would be best, would be to keep track of the
> > sources that you have installed, so that you know when the sources
> > have been updated. Or have apt recompile for you.
>
> well i just don't understand why apt thinks it shou
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 01:25:15AM -0500, Brad wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:27:52PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> >
> > > and if you want to compile them there's always 'apt-get --compile source
> > > packagename'. if you haven't used it before here's how it works :)
> >
> > with the annoyi
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:27:52PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> > and if you want to compile them there's always 'apt-get --compile source
> > packagename'. if you haven't used it before here's how it works :)
>
> with the annoying side affect of apt insisting on replacing the
> locally compile
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 02:02:35AM -0400, Marshal Kar-Cheung Wong wrote:
> > "Ethan" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> and if you want to compile them there's always 'apt-get
> >> --compile source packagename'. if you haven't used it before
> >> here's how it work
> "Ethan" == Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> and if you want to compile them there's always 'apt-get
>> --compile source packagename'. if you haven't used it before
>> here's how it works :)
> with the annoying side affect of apt insisting on replacing the
> l
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 12:29:30PM -0800, Adam Shand wrote:
> > If you're really hard core about security and encryption (and I'm going
> > to be heretical here, but hey, I have to plug my home), try OpenBSD.
> > Since it's main repository is in Canada, US crypto laws don't apply. I
> > played w
> "Adam" == Adam Shand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Probably not. Beside the crypto laws, there is also the DSFG
>> that debian adheres to, and many of the encryption schemes have
>> patents on them, thus makeing them non-free, and not in debian
>> by default.
> oh yeah
> Probably not. Beside the crypto laws, there is also the DSFG that
> debian adheres to, and many of the encryption schemes have patents on
> them, thus makeing them non-free, and not in debian by default.
oh yeah, i forgot about that ... still there are some that are patent
unencumbered aren't
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 10:49:10PM -0400, Marshal Kar-Cheung Wong wrote:
> > "Adam" == Adam Shand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > with the new mellowing of usa crypto laws, is there any chance
> > that the international kernel patch could be included in the
> > default debian ker
> "Adam" == Adam Shand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> you have to get the international kernal patch from either
>> www.kerneli.org, or in the non-US section. Then you have to
>> patch the kernel and recompile.
> with the new mellowing of usa crypto laws, is there any chance
> you have to get the international kernal patch from either
> www.kerneli.org, or in the non-US section. Then you have to patch the
> kernel and recompile.
with the new mellowing of usa crypto laws, is there any chance that the
international kernel patch could be included in the default debian
> "Michael" == Michael O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hola~ Rookie question here. I'm trying to setup an encrypted
> filesystem as per:
>
> http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Loopback-Encrypted-Filesystem-HOWTO-3.html
> The first step is installing the latest crypto pat
"Michael O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rookie question here. I'm trying to setup an encrypted filesystem as per:
>
> http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Loopback-Encrypted-Filesystem-HOWTO-3.html
>
> The first step is installing the latest crypto patch. How do I install the
> "latest crypt
17 matches
Mail list logo
