Re: Display resolution 3840x2160@24rb stopped working after Upgrade from Stretch to Buster

2019-09-13 Thread Jan Michael Greiner
Thanks to everybody, for all the hints. I think the way to search in, is to create an edid file and load it at boot. I searched in this direction before, I just abandoned that way because it did not work. Now the question I have is: How to create that edid file. The tool I found creates a file i

Re: Display resolution 3840x2160@24rb stopped working after Upgrade from Stretch to Buster

2019-09-12 Thread David Wright
On Thu 12 Sep 2019 at 06:23:04 (+), Jan Michael Greiner wrote: > On Monday, September 9, 2019, 1:55:06 PM GMT+2, Charles Curley wrote: > >> On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:20:37+ (UTC) Jan Michael Greiner wrote: > >> With Debian Stretch (9.8) I had the display running with 3840x2160 > >> resolution a

Re: Display resolution 3840x2160@24rb stopped working after Upgrade from Stretch to Buster

2019-09-12 Thread Dan Ritter
Jan Michael Greiner wrote: > Dear all, > > My laptop: Lenovo E520 > Graphics: Intel HD Graphics 3000 (kernel module i915) > > External display AOC U2879VF, 28 inch, connected by HDMI cable > > With Debian Stretch (9.8) I had the display running with 3840x2160 resolution > at 24Hz reduced blank

Re: Display resolution 3840x2160@24rb stopped working after Upgrade from Stretch to Buster

2019-09-12 Thread Torben Schou Jensen
Hi I have a kind of same problem. A monitor able of displaying at 1920x1080. Intel HD Graphics 620 with driver i915/modesetting. With old Stable (kernel 4.9.0-9) it was working fine. With new Stable (kernel 4.19.0-6) it set max display 1024x768. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?

Re: Display resolution 3840x2160@24rb stopped working after Upgrade from Stretch to Buster

2019-09-11 Thread Jan Michael Greiner
Dear Charles, On Monday, September 9, 2019, 1:55:06 PM GMT+2, Charles Curley wrote: >> On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:20:37+ (UTC) Jan Michael Greiner wrote: >> With Debian Stretch (9.8) I had the display running with 3840x2160 >> resolution at 24Hz reduced blank. >> [What worked with Debian Stretch

Re: Display resolution 3840x2160@24rb stopped working after Upgrade from Stretch to Buster

2019-09-09 Thread Charles Curley
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 10:20:37 + (UTC) Jan Michael Greiner wrote: > With Debian Stretch (9.8) I had the display running with 3840x2160 > resolution at 24Hz reduced blank. And I take it you want to reproduce that on Debian 10 (buster). I suggest you: * Install arandr. * Use arandr to set thing

Re: Re: Display resolution.

2016-01-04 Thread Ricardo M.A.
I have sent twice the Xorg.0.log but I think it is too long for display... ¿Which part is the most needed to understand this? I also have the Xorg.0.old there... ¿Could it be helpful? thanks.

Re: Display resolution.

2016-01-04 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 09:16 -0600, Ricardo M.A. wrote: > In an update fron the last week, something stopped working. Debian no > longer recognize the model and the resolution of the external display > in > automatic. > The only resolutions recognized were the three traditional > resolutions for > V

RE: Display Resolution (SOLVED)

2012-08-22 Thread Nelson Green
issue separately. Thanks to all who took time to assist. Nelson > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Display Resolution > Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 16:58:10 +0200 > > Nelson, it looks like your reply did not reach the list, possibly > because it's over 100 kB in

Re: Display Resolution

2012-08-04 Thread Sven Joachim
Nelson, it looks like your reply did not reach the list, possibly because it's over 100 kB in size. Please configure your mailer to send plain text _only_ to avoid that. On 2012-08-04 16:39 +0200, Nelson Green wrote: >> > The nouveau version in squeeze does not support these cards, they should >

RE: Display Resolution

2012-08-03 Thread Nelson Green
> The nouveau version in squeeze does not support these cards, they should > work in wheezy though. > > > I'm reluctant to suggest this, > > but you probably need the nvidia driver (package nvidia-glx in section > > non-free) to get full support for your cards. > > Let's hope that security is

Re: Display Resolution

2012-08-03 Thread Brian
On Fri 03 Aug 2012 at 07:05:06 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Jo, 02 aug 12, 23:48:52, Brian wrote: > > > > Before he gets into that, it could be worth checking with > > > >dpkg -l | grep xserver-xorg-video > > > > that the nouveau package is installed. > > Unless I'm mistaken, his Xorg

Re: Display Resolution

2012-08-02 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Jo, 02 aug 12, 23:48:52, Brian wrote: > > Before he gets into that, it could be worth checking with > >dpkg -l | grep xserver-xorg-video > > that the nouveau package is installed. Unless I'm mistaken, his Xorg.0.log indicates nouveau is already installed. Kind regards, Andrei -- Offto

Re: Display Resolution

2012-08-02 Thread Brian
On Fri 03 Aug 2012 at 01:09:03 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Jo, 02 aug 12, 16:54:41, Nelson Green wrote: > > > > Thanks for the reply. I can't believe I didn't think to look for a log > > file related to this. And no, there is no xorg.conf, just the > > Xorg.0.log file. It is quite large,

Re: Display Resolution

2012-08-02 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2012-08-03 00:09 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Jo, 02 aug 12, 16:54:41, Nelson Green wrote: >> >> Thanks for the reply. I can't believe I didn't think to look for a log >> file related to this. And no, there is no xorg.conf, just the >> Xorg.0.log file. It is quite large, but here it is.

Re: Display Resolution

2012-08-02 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Jo, 02 aug 12, 16:54:41, Nelson Green wrote: > > Thanks for the reply. I can't believe I didn't think to look for a log > file related to this. And no, there is no xorg.conf, just the > Xorg.0.log file. It is quite large, but here it is. I see some > interesting lines about the display in it

Re: Display Resolution

2012-08-02 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Jo, 02 aug 12, 15:38:45, Nelson Green wrote: > > I am unsure what either of the errors mean, nor how to proceed from > here. Would anyone mind advising me as to what my next step should be? Please attach your full /var/log/Xorg.0.log and /etc/X11/xorg.conf (if any). Kind regards, Andrei --

Re: Display Resolution-Frequency (Debian vs Windows)

2008-04-06 Thread Bob
Sanjaya Vitharana wrote: Hi All, Just trying to move my home desktop to Debian from Windows. As initial stage I'm trying with dual boot until I get used to Debian. But the problem is with "gdm" Display Properties. I can't get expected quality for 1024 x 768 resolution as my Windows did. For

Re: Display Resolution-Frequency (Debian vs Windows)

2008-03-24 Thread Tom Goulet
On 3/24/08, Sanjaya Vitharana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Selecting 1024 x 768 75 Hz choosing "Medium" will end up with 1024 x 768 60 > Hz. > > Now Desktop->Preferences->Screen Resolution has only 60 Hz option in > dropdown for 1024 x 768. Blast it. Try installing gvidm, too. Try using the "ve

Re: Display Resolution-Frequency (Debian vs Windows)

2008-03-24 Thread Sanjaya Vitharana
> I suspect that your monitor doesn't actually have a horizontal sync of > 30 to 54, it's just wrong on the web site. Why don't you run > dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg again, and this time instead of picking > "Advanced" to specify the numbers directly, choose "Medium" and pick > "A monitor that c

Re: Display Resolution-Frequency (Debian vs Windows)

2008-03-23 Thread Tom Goulet
On 3/22/08, Sanjaya Vitharana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is not accurate. Your display's vertical refresh is 50-120 Hz, not > > 50-160. > Thanks, I found the correct one as. > http://www.viewsonic.com/support/desktopdisplays/crtmonitors/e2series/e50c/index.htm > I have tried with "dpkg-r

Re: Display Resolution-Frequency (Debian vs Windows)

2008-03-21 Thread Tom Goulet
On 3/21/08, Sanjaya Vitharana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After reading this mail I tried to start the X using "startx" (instead of > "gdm") & it directly loged me as a root. But same effect, it only shows me > 60/87 Hz for 1024 x 768 and previous problems are there. Yeah, startx is better for t

Re: Display Resolution-Frequency (Debian vs Windows)

2008-03-21 Thread Paul Johnson
On Friday 21 March 2008 07:00:33 am Sanjaya Vitharana wrote: > > You're doing great. > > Thanks > > > Are you sure you restarted X after modifying /etc/X11/xorg.conf? > > No I don't restart the X. Even I didn't know that could be done after > changing xorg.conf without restarting the PC. (X server

Re: Display Resolution-Frequency (Debian vs Windows)

2008-03-21 Thread Sanjaya Vitharana
> > You're doing great. > Thanks > > Are you sure you restarted X after modifying /etc/X11/xorg.conf? > No I don't restart the X. Even I didn't know that could be done after changing xorg.conf without restarting the PC. (X server must be restarted entirely after reboot) What I did is, just res

Re: Display Resolution-Frequency (Debian vs Windows)

2008-03-21 Thread Tom Goulet
On 3/21/08, Sanjaya Vitharana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just trying to move my home desktop to Debian from Windows. As initial stage > I'm trying with dual boot until I get used to Debian. But the problem is > with "gdm" Display Properties. I can't get expected quality for 1024 x 768 > resoluti

Re: display resolution

2005-07-01 Thread Chris Bannister
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 11:16:41PM +0200, Csanyi Pal wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 01:50:06PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >From another OS I know that a system here will display > > at 1024 x 768 x 16. "startx" alone appears to produce > > a > > resolution of 640 x 480. The man page

Re: display resolution

2005-06-30 Thread Csanyi Pal
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:03:09PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The man page lists only a few parameters for the > .videogen configuration file. All others are only > command line parameters. That is a little awkward. My .vodeogen configuration file is: mode 800x600#

Re: display resolution

2005-06-29 Thread Csanyi Pal
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 01:50:06PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >From another OS I know that a system here will display > at 1024 x 768 x 16. "startx" alone appears to produce > a > resolution of 640 x 480. The man page tells me how to > specify the color depth. Can the 1024 x 768 resolu

Re: Display/resolution problems

2005-06-01 Thread Tony Godshall
Indeed. As says 'man XF86Config-4' says, "The first valid mode in this list will be the default display mode for startup". Personally, with laptops, I give it no choice- just the native rez, since anything else looks crappy / is a waste. According to Trevor Pankonien, > Got it working after th

Re: Display/resolution problems

2005-06-01 Thread Trevor Pankonien
Got it working after the reinstall and amazing how easy it was! just had to add the 1024x768 BEFORE the other two options. I had tried a similar approach but put it after the otehr two...lesson learned! thanks for the help everyone! On 6/1/05, Trevor Pankonien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks f

Re: Display/resolution problems

2005-06-01 Thread Trevor Pankonien
Thanks for all the help so far. I will give these ideas a try as soon as sarge is done reinstalling :) Otherwise, could it be that ubuntu uses Xorg and debian is not? if this is the case, what steps would i have to take to get xorg into debian Thanks Trevor On 6/1/05, Tony Godshall <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Display/resolution problems

2005-06-01 Thread Tony Godshall
According to Trevor Pankonien, > I just switched over from Ubuntu since debian has no problem working > with my MP3 player, but now i have a new problem. The display on my > laptop is sitting inside a black box/border, makeing approx half of my > screen just black. I have a Sony Vaio PCG-FRV26 note