On Ma, 05 aug 14, 13:01:48, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > I'm not very familiar with Gmail's interface, but Outlook definitely
> > does have threaded views.
>
> As of the last time I used Outlook a couple of years ago Outlook did
> not have threads but had "conversations". O
On 20140804_2358+0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 03 aug 14, 13:28:06, Bob Proulx wrote:
> >
> > P.S. I still think digests are less desirable because I don't see a
> > way to view the discussion in a threaded view. Threaded views have
> > been around for so long that I couldn't live without
On 8/5/2014 10:24 PM, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On 20140805_0004+0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> On Lu, 04 aug 14, 08:52:17, Paul E Condon wrote:
>>>
>>> I've spent some time recently, trying to use the Gmail browser
>>> interface. I would never switch to it from Mutt, excepting only if
>>> Microsoft d
On 20140805_0004+0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 04 aug 14, 08:52:17, Paul E Condon wrote:
> >
> > I've spent some time recently, trying to use the Gmail browser
> > interface. I would never switch to it from Mutt, excepting only if
> > Microsoft does a corporate take-over of Debian (They are
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > P.S. I still think digests are less desirable because I don't see a
> > way to view the discussion in a threaded view. Threaded views have
> > been around for so long that I couldn't live without them. Of course
> > Gmail and Outlook users don't have
On Monday 04 August 2014 21:58:36 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> I'm not very familiar with Gmail's interface
Lucky you. ;-)
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debi
On Lu, 04 aug 14, 08:52:17, Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> I've spent some time recently, trying to use the Gmail browser
> interface. I would never switch to it from Mutt, excepting only if
> Microsoft does a corporate take-over of Debian (They are both
> corporations under the Law, and under the Law,
On Du, 03 aug 14, 13:28:06, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> P.S. I still think digests are less desirable because I don't see a
> way to view the discussion in a threaded view. Threaded views have
> been around for so long that I couldn't live without them. Of course
> Gmail and Outlook users don't have t
On 20140803_1328-0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > I used a variety of mailers back then and I don't recall which ones
> > handled digests nicely and which did not.
>
> I just tested mutt and digests and mutt handles message digests quite
> well. And furthermore because the Debian l
On Dom, 03 Ago 2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
The inability of people to deal with digest messages these days is the
main reason I think digests should be removed as a mailing list
option.
+1 to that.
I'd also like a filter that rejects mails that have Re: (and
variations) in the Subject and no In-
Bob Proulx wrote:
> I used a variety of mailers back then and I don't recall which ones
> handled digests nicely and which did not.
I just tested mutt and digests and mutt handles message digests quite
well. And furthermore because the Debian lists includes the
individual messages as MIME attemen
David Baron wrote:
> > Replying from the digest breaks threads. I eschew KDE 4, so I don't know
> > about KMail in KDE4, but KDE3 KMail does not break threads.
>
> I do not understand the difference. If I hit reply, so I get the
> title of the digest which I replace with the desired re: Sho
On Sun, 3 Aug 2014 12:38:16 -0400
AW wrote:
Hello AW,
>lists. So, I don't know what I'm doing with regards to top/bottom
>postings, quoting, etc... There are many good reasons why a particular
Based on that and what you go on to say, it's obvious you're willing to
learn about what is or isn'
On Sun, 3 Aug 2014 16:41:17 +0100
Brad Rogers wrote:
>Quite an achievement, given that
>99.% of MUAs quote correctly "out of the box".
I'm fairly old to Debian. I run a few email servers. I know the ins
and outs of lots of things. And yet, I've rarely posted to mailing
lists. So, I don
On Sun, 3 Aug 2014 10:55:00 -0400
Steve Litt wrote:
Hello Steve,
>Yes, but *not* changing the Subject is an atrocity. I've often thought
>of piping everything with digest type Subjects to /dev/null. Another
>atrocity is these guys who leave the entire digest intact when replying.
I tend to agre
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:42:53 +0100
Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:14:20 +0300
> David Baron wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
> >Or is there some header or marker I should be hitting as well?
>
> Reference and/or Reply-To headers. The digest, depending on /exactly/
> how it as construct
On Wednesday 30 July 2014 08:14:20 David Baron wrote:
> I do not understand the difference. If I hit reply, so I get the title of
> the digest which I replace with the desired re: Should not this be OK.
No. It gives rise to a new thread, with the digest data, which is not the
same as the he
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:26:04 -0400
The Wanderer wrote:
Hello The,
>(References: and In-Reply-To:, surely?)
You are, of course, right. My brain was waaay ahead of my fingers at
the time. My apologies for any confusion caused.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/30/2014 04:42 AM, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:14:20 +0300 David Baron
> wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
>> Or is there some header or marker I should be hitting as well?
>
> Reference and/or Reply-To headers.
(References: and In
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:14:20 +0300
David Baron wrote:
Hello David,
>Or is there some header or marker I should be hitting as well?
Reference and/or Reply-To headers. The digest, depending on /exactly/
how it as constructed and /exactly/ how you reply, won't necessarily
carry the right headers
On Wednesday 30 July 2014 02:52:38 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org
wrote:
> > When you reply threading is broken. Surely you can see that. Could be
> > kmail of course.
>
> Replying from the digest breaks threads. I eschew KDE 4, so I don't know
> about KMail in KDE4, but KDE3 KMail
21 matches
Mail list logo
