Bob wrote:
Oleg Verych wrote:
8< 8< snip
Sorry for the delay, RL has been rather demanding of late.
I've installed 2.6.18 from sid but it's displaying the same problems.
As a test of CPU power I've been decompressing the kernel tree, with a
UP 2.6 kernel this takes about 1m 15s, I don't know
Oleg Verych wrote:
On 2006-11-21, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[]
How about 2.6.18 from sid? If also bad, try bugzilla on kernel.org, or
lkml.
Is it possible to do this without migrating the whole system to sid? I
can't see a backport, one option would be if someone could post the
.config fi
celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> I believe that the k6 is NOT a 686.
I think you're right : someone on l.d.u.french has explained to me
it's more than a 586 (586 + MMX if i did'nt misunderstand) but not a
686.
I also was told it is possible to compile the kernel with :
CONFIG_MK6
On 11/5/06, Bernard Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Second i said myself : "Dummy, amd k6-II is not a 486 processor but a
686". So i got linux-image-2.6-686. It's not written on it that it
works on AMD K6-II. But i tried and ... nothing append. After loading
I believe that the k6 is NOT a 68
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:55:11AM +0100, Bernard Adrian wrote:
>
> Till yesterday, i was using linux-image-2.4-27-2-k6 on my amd k6-II
> (64 Mo RAM).
>
> I decided to upgrade the kernel. In a first time i tried
> linux-image-2.6-486. No problem. Really.
>
> Second i said myself : "Dummy, amd k6
I've found and 'fixed' the problem with the configuration for this
PCMCIA driver.
It seems that even though the config value from the original
configuration had CONFIG_NET_PCMCIA=y, when I ran 'make xconfig' it
changed this to a commented out line '# CONFIG_NET_PCMCIA is not set'
and so the l
> The only reference in the online manual from your websight says to
> install the single processor kernel first then compile new kernel
> (even though the installation DVD has 2.4 smp and 2.6 smp on it). If
> it is possible, I would like to be able to select 2.6 smp from the
> beginning of the
The easiest way I've found to get a 2.6 SMP kernel on installation is to
select the 'expert26' install mode. There's an option to choose which
kernel you'd like to install, and 2.6-SMP is one of the choices. The
'expert' part of it is somewhat misleading: if you've installed Debian
before, you'll
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 14:03 -0300, Victor Munoz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:30:06AM -0800, belahcene abdelkader wrote:
> >
> > I downloaded the last CD debian testing Disk 1 (janv
> > 30), the installation began correctly from the CD ( so
> > it is detected ide cdrom well known type) afte
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:30:06AM -0800, belahcene abdelkader wrote:
> I downloaded the last CD debian testing Disk 1 (janv
> 30), the installation began correctly from the CD ( so
> it is detected ide cdrom well known type) after a
> while, it gave an error : no cdrom detected , !!!
> So I went
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 08:30:06AM -0800, belahcene abdelkader wrote:
>
> I downloaded the last CD debian testing Disk 1 (janv
> 30), the installation began correctly from the CD ( so
> it is detected ide cdrom well known type) after a
> while, it gave an error : no cdrom detected , !!!
> So I we
I gave up trying to upgrade it
I did a full expert26 reinstall, and it seems to be ok now.
Dave
On Tuesday 18 Oct 2005 10:22, Dave Whiteley wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am having problems installing kernel 2.6 on my Dell Optiplex GX280. I
> have seen a lot of traffic on the web and the forums about t
did apt-get dist upgrade to my SID, donwloded 2.6.12-3 src and build
was successful excpet i had one error regarding slda wan driver that i
unset it in .config file.
Thanks
Paras.
On 7/28/05, Paras pradhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am however excluding absolutely everything that I do not
> I am however excluding absolutely everything that I do not need (also as
> modules).
I think i cannot exclude some of the modules like: kallsysms, isicom etc..
if the unset the values for kallsysm let's say ,at the time of
make-kpkg it automatically sets the value.
correct me if i am wrong and
Andrew Nelson wrote:
>> This is your problem, the new versions of GCC wont compile the current
>> Kernel sources in Debian. You can
>>
That's new to me. I have compiled both 2.6.10, 2.6.11 and 2.6.12
successfully with GCC 4.X on my bleeding edge sid system.
Actually just 2 hours ago I did a to
Wackojacko wrote:
>
>> gcc (GCC) 4.0.1 (Debian 4.0.1-2)
>> g++ (GCC) 4.0.1 (Debian 4.0.1-2)
>> GNU Make 3.80
>> automake (GNU automake) 1.4-p6
>
>
> This is your problem, the new versions of GCC wont compile the current
> Kernel sources in Debian. You can
>
> 1. Change the top level MAKEFILE i
> > compile using make-kpkg.
> >
> > gcc (GCC) 4.0.1 (Debian 4.0.1-2)
> > g++ (GCC) 4.0.1 (Debian 4.0.1-2)
>
> Try this. Edit the top-level makefile;
> e.g., /usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.11/Makefile.
>
> Change:
>
> HOSTCC = gcc
> HOSTCXX = g++
>
> to read:
>
> HOSTCC
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 07:16, Paras pradhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> i am using debian sid using kernel 2.6.11. i want to build the custom
> compile using make-kpkg.
>
> gcc (GCC) 4.0.1 (Debian 4.0.1-2)
> g++ (GCC) 4.0.1 (Debian 4.0.1-2)
Try this. Edit the top-level
gcc (GCC) 4.0.1 (Debian 4.0.1-2)
g++ (GCC) 4.0.1 (Debian 4.0.1-2)
GNU Make 3.80
automake (GNU automake) 1.4-p6
This is your problem, the new versions of GCC wont compile the current
Kernel sources in Debian. You can
1. Change the top level MAKEFILE in the source directory to point at the
Am Mittwoch, den 17.11.2004, 10:01 -0600 schrieb Jeremy Turner:
> Hey fellow Debian users,
>
> I thought I read someplace that in kernel 2.6 when you have an option
> compiled into the kernel, you can echo options into /proc or /sys
> someplace.
>
> For example, I have an ATI All-In-Wonder TV tu
Russ Cook wrote:
David Clymer wrote:
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 07:06, Russ Cook wrote:
The problem turned out to be the lack of module-init-tools on my
system. An additional problem was that module-init-tools conflicted
with modutils already installed. I had to upgrade modutils to most
cu
David Clymer wrote:
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 07:06, Russ Cook wrote:
The problem turned out to be the lack of module-init-tools on my
system. An additional problem was that module-init-tools conflicted
with modutils already installed. I had to upgrade modutils to most
current version f
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 07:06, Russ Cook wrote:
> >
> >
> The problem turned out to be the lack of module-init-tools on my
> system. An additional problem was that module-init-tools conflicted
> with modutils already installed. I had to upgrade modutils to most
> current version first, then in
David Clymer wrote:
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 06:29, Russ Cook wrote:
David Clymer wrote:
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 19:16, Russ Cook wrote:
I'm running unstable on a Pentium 2 machine, kernel 2.4.18.
I downloaded the kernel-source-2.6.8 deb package today, updated my
config file, and
tried t
Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm about sure this is unnecessary, but you *did* do `make mrproper`
> before compiling everything right?
Why would you ever want to do a 'make mrproper', since 'make mrproper'
removes all your changes (even your .config), before a compile?
if you just
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 21:53, Russ Cook wrote:
> >>>
> >>David (and the list),
> >> In the hope that it might be useful, I've attached the config file.
> >> The last compiled files in the process before the error messages,
> >>according to the screen output, were in the sound section. If you h
Russ Cook wrote:
I'm running unstable on a Pentium 2 machine, kernel 2.4.18.
I downloaded the kernel-source-2.6.8 deb package today, updated my
config file, and
tried to compile the kernel. I got the following errors:
make[2] [modins_post] Error 1
make[1] [real_stamp_image] Error 2
Needless to s
On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 06:29, Russ Cook wrote:
> David Clymer wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 19:16, Russ Cook wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I'm running unstable on a Pentium 2 machine, kernel 2.4.18.
> >>I downloaded the kernel-source-2.6.8 deb package today, updated my
> >>config file, and
> >>tried to
David Clymer wrote:
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 19:16, Russ Cook wrote:
I'm running unstable on a Pentium 2 machine, kernel 2.4.18.
I downloaded the kernel-source-2.6.8 deb package today, updated my
config file, and
tried to compile the kernel. I got the following errors:
make[2] [modins_post] Error
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 19:16, Russ Cook wrote:
> I'm running unstable on a Pentium 2 machine, kernel 2.4.18.
> I downloaded the kernel-source-2.6.8 deb package today, updated my
> config file, and
> tried to compile the kernel. I got the following errors:
> make[2] [modins_post] Error 1
> make[1]
Hello
Chris Gorman (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 05:51:48AM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
>>
>>> Where would I find a comprehensive discussion about the flaws,
>>> maturity and problems related to kernels 2.6.*?
>>>
>> Mor
This one's a pretty good what has changed, what new is available document.
As to the flaws, maturity and problems, I havn't seen one.
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/docs/post-halloween-2.6.txt
Chris
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 05:51:48AM -0400, Antonio
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 05:51:48AM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> Where would I find a comprehensive discussion about the flaws, maturity and
> problems related to kernels 2.6.*?
>
More exactly: comprehensive (as much as possible). sites are many, but
I haven't found any that is comprehensive.
On Saturday 10 July 2004 08:54 am, Christoph Sticksel wrote:
> | open("/dev/snd/controlC0", O_RDONLY)= -1 ENODEV (No such device)
> | open("/dev/aloadC0", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENODEV (No such device)
> | open("/dev/snd/controlC0", O_RDWR) = -1 ENODEV (No such device)
> | open("/dev/snd
Silvan wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 July 2004 11:00 am, Christoph Sticksel wrote:
>> What is the preferred way to load modules? modconf or
>> /etc/also/modultils/0.5? Does is matter that /etc/alsa/0.9 is empty?
>
> I don't know what the "preferred" way is, I don't suppose. I always use
> modconf, but th
On Tuesday 06 July 2004 11:00 am, Christoph Sticksel wrote:
> That's what I thought. This is what lsmod tells me about loaded modules
> | snd_ac97_codec 70020 1 snd_ymfpci
[etc...]
That looks fine off-hand, though I don't know exactly what I should see there
for your hardware. I don't
Silvan wrote:
> On Sunday 04 July 2004 01:14 pm, Christoph Sticksel wrote:
>
>> Everything sound-related is loaded and lsmod shows a whole bunch of snd_*
>> modules, snd, soundcore, opl3sa2 and ad1848 are there as well.
>
>> If I do a "modprobe -r opl3sa2" and reload it with "modprobe opl3sa2" I
On Sunday 04 July 2004 01:14 pm, Christoph Sticksel wrote:
> Everything sound-related is loaded and lsmod shows a whole bunch of snd_*
> modules, snd, soundcore, opl3sa2 and ad1848 are there as well.
> If I do a "modprobe -r opl3sa2" and reload it with "modprobe opl3sa2" I see
I'm not familiar w
Thanks Joris, but I would like make more a question:
What can I do to my symbolic link in /dev become permanent???
Hugs
Gilberto
Em Tue, 01 Jun 2004 23:18:17 +0200
Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Gilberto Villani Brito wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm using Kernel 2.6.4 in my desktop, so I
Gilberto Villani Brito wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Kernel 2.6.4 in my desktop, so I didn't note difference
about velocity, but I liked.
I have a nvidia and I need to create the devs to use the driver,
but when I restart my computer this devs disappear.
How can I do to this devs become permanent???
When I
Uwe Dippel escribió:
Having read around 100 posts on this list, I am still confused.
I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so
good.
I did change the link /dev/cdrom to /dev/hdb, consequentially.
In order to have access to the drive, I also had to chgrp cdrom /dev/hdb.
Andrei Badea wrote:
On 21.5.2004 0:58 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Andrei Badea wrote:
just upgraded to the 2.6 kernel (2.6.6) and when I reboot, the hard
drives are turned off. They are then powered on during the boot
Kernel bug. I hope it will be fixed in 2.6.7.
Th
On 21.5.2004 0:58 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Andrei Badea wrote:
just upgraded to the 2.6 kernel (2.6.6) and when I reboot, the hard
drives are turned off. They are then powered on during the boot
Kernel bug. I hope it will be fixed in 2.6.7.
Thank you, it seems that
On Thursday 20 May 2004 06:58 pm, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2004, Andrei Badea wrote:
> > just upgraded to the 2.6 kernel (2.6.6) and when I reboot, the hard
> > drives are turned off. They are then powered on during the boot
>
> Kernel bug. I hope it will be fixed in 2.6
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Andrei Badea wrote:
> just upgraded to the 2.6 kernel (2.6.6) and when I reboot, the hard
> drives are turned off. They are then powered on during the boot
Kernel bug. I hope it will be fixed in 2.6.7.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to br
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:48:54 +0100, stephen parkinson wrote:
> actually xcdroast works quite nicely, in 2.6 with hdc=cdrom hdd=cdrom
> and no ide-scsi anywhere in sight
You *think* so; or it *does* ??
Then tell us your secret. I tried ... root=/dev/hda5 hdb=cdrom
and re-detected the drive, etc.,
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 10:00, Uwe Dippel wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 07:30:05 +0200, Mike Chandler wrote:
>
> > I give up. What is wrong with k3b?
>
> Everything. Especially the 'k'. Because it means you run KDE. Look at the
> dependencies !
> That is one of the great things of xcdroast: You can
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so
good.
Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't
lose my burner..
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 07:30:05 +0200, Mike Chandler wrote:
> I give up. What is wrong with k3b?
Everything. Especially the 'k'. Because it means you run KDE. Look at the
dependencies !
That is one of the great things of xcdroast: You can run it from any
desktop environment. Non-bloated ones, e.g.:
On Saturday 24 April 2004 09:21 pm, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >> Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far
> >> > so good.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so
>> > good.
>>
>> Whatwh
Marc Wilson wrote:
> It's true that ide-scsi is depreciated, but I can't think of a
> single front-end to cdrecord that supports ATAPI device specifications
> other than k3b, and who wants to use *that*?
>
> Anyone want to put forward a front-end that does?
I use CDR Toaster without problems.
A
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 05:10:07 +0200, Marc Wilson wrote:
> Ide-scsi will continue to work for some time.
It, actually, doesn't. At least, not in all occasions. It is considered
broken.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004 04:50:07 +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't
> lose my burner...I'm now confused and surprised I didn't.
Because you left the scsi-emulation as boot parameter. But it is badly
broken in 2.6.X and Linus fully recommen
On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 23:00:08 +0200, Adam Aube wrote:
> In your case, since your CD-ROM is /dev/hdb, that should be "hdb=cdrom", not
> "hdc=cdrom".
Ah, sure. Typo.
Question is: *do* I need this boot parameter ??
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 07:49:20PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so
> > good.
>
> Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't
> lose my burner...I'm now confuse
Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do understand that we don't want scsi-emulation any longer. So far so
> good.
Whatwhatwhat? This changed? I upgraded from 2.4 to 2.6 and didn't
lose my burner...I'm now confused and surprised I didn't.
--
Paul Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux. You
Uwe Dippel wrote:
> I did change the link /dev/cdrom to /dev/hdb, consequentially.
> In order to have access to the drive, I also had to chgrp cdrom /dev/hdb.
>
> Some posters say that you need to add hdc=cdrom to your boot
> parameters. Is this correct ? Anything needed at all ?
In your case, s
OK, I see. I'm still somewhat surprised, but now I know what's what.
Thanks a lot,
Flo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 06:07:21PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:32:20PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:54:50PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
> > > Sarge and 2.6 as the default kernel? Well, I'd guess like »never«.
> > > Maybe it will be the defau
Hello Colin!
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:32:20PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:54:50PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:14:33AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Does anyone know when they will package sarge with the 2.6 kernel as a
> > > def
On Tue, 2004-04-20 at 10:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know when they will package sarge with the 2.6 kernel as a
> default kernel instead of it being an add in?
>
I don`t know what you mean with "package sarge", but new Mandrake 10
release has kernel 2.6.3.
See http://www.mandrakes
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:54:50PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:14:33AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Does anyone know when they will package sarge with the 2.6 kernel as a
> > default kernel instead of it being an add in?
>
> Sarge and 2.6 as the default kernel?
Hallo David!
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:14:33AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know when they will package sarge with the 2.6 kernel as a
> default kernel instead of it being an add in?
Sarge and 2.6 as the default kernel? Well, I'd guess like »never«.
Maybe it will be the default
> Hi folk.
> I have problem with using my USB Epson 2400 photo scanner.
> uname -r
> 2.6.6-rc1
> lsusb | grep -i epson
> Bus 004 Device 002: ID 04b8:011b Seiko Epson Corp. Perfection 2400 Photo
...
> sane-find-scanner | grep -i epson
> found USB scanner (vendor=0x04b8 [EPSON], product=0x011b [EPSON
also sprach Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.04.12.1611 +0200]:
> Try turning APIC off. It's in the archives - nForce chipsets have
> issues with APIC.
Per your request, I compiled a new kernel without APIC/IOAPIC
(realising only afterwards that I could have used kernel
parameters...).
H
On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 10:19:21PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I have a weird problem here: A machine with an XP 2200 downgraded to
> 1800 MHz, 256 Mb RAM and an nForce2 chipset. 512Mb swapspace exist.
Try turning APIC off. It's in the archives - nForce chipsets have
issues with APIC.
A
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 07:41:08PM +, M.Kirchhoff wrote:
> Under the 2.6.x kernel, is it advisable to just create a swap file
> (via dd) rather than using an actual partition, perhaps with swapd
> to keep things safe?
Just use the partition. It's
M --
...and then M. Kirchhoff said...
%
% Under the 2.6.x kernel, is it advisable to just create a swap file (via dd)
% rather than using an actual partition, perhaps with swapd to keep things safe?
In general a swap partition is ever so slightly more efficient than a
swap file because one needn
After the first time I installed the new kernel, it seemed like the
changes I made in /etc/modules didn't matter at all. Nor did modconf
remove the old modules, i.e. the `fatals' bootup reported.
After the second time I installed the (new) kernel, changes I made in
/etc/modules *did* matter. So
Kristian Niemi mentioned :
=> They're not in /var/log/boot.
=> I don't believe it's "unresolved symbol" that is printed on the screen,
=> but not sure either.
You know what I mean :)
The message isn't the same in 2.6 kernel
=> Pretty sure the errors have something to do with modules from previ
I know what I'm looking for, because I see them (the messages) flash by
at bootup. It looks like it's trying to load (old) modules, producing
FATAL something. Not sure, because they just whizz by; no time to read
them properly, nor even to catch a glimpse of them all.
They're not in /var/log/bo
Kristian Niemi mentioned :
=> At bootup I see a number or error-messages flash by, but they dissappear
=> too fast for me to read them. I've tried to find them in dmesg & various
=> files in /var/log/, but so far I haven't had any luck. I see the place
You can't read the error-messages, but you
Hello all,
i managed to resolve this issue by upgrading module-init-tools from
0.9.10 to 0.9.14. Should have tried that first heh.
Am Son, 2004-01-18 um 18.52 schrieb Matthias Hentges:
> Hello all,
>
> i'm running kernel 2.6.1-mm4 on my laptop and i'm *very* pleased with
> it's performance on t
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 02:21:18AM +0530, Deboo said
> Debian Woody system, compiling 2.6 time and again keeps giving a "VFS:
> Kernel Panic: Unable to mount root fs" error, however many times I
> recompile. I do not have module init tools installed.
Then you can't use modules AT ALL with your 2.
On Thu, 2004-01-01 at 21:51, Deboo wrote:
> Debian Woody system, compiling 2.6 time and again keeps giving a "VFS:
> Kernel Panic: Unable to mount root fs" error, however many times I
> recompile.
do you have everything you need compiled in? Filesystems of root/boot
partition, IDE controller etc?
* David Palmer. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031127 13:29]:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:24:02 -0500
> Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Tom Allison wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a test package of kernel-image-2.6 ??
> > >
> > > I thought I read once there was, but the search engine is down right
> >
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:24:02 -0500
Paul Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Allison wrote:
>
> > Is there a test package of kernel-image-2.6 ??
> >
> > I thought I read once there was, but the search engine is down right
> > now on the debian site.
> >
> >
>
> apt-cache search kernel-image|
Tom Allison wrote:
Is there a test package of kernel-image-2.6 ??
I thought I read once there was, but the search engine is down right
now on the debian site.
apt-cache search kernel-image|grep "2.6"
kernel-image-2.6.0-test9-1-386 - Linux kernel image for version
2.6.0-test9 on 386.
kernel-s
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 02:35:08AM -0400, Stephen Cormier wrote:
>
> I had the same problem and I think it is the CONFIG_FB_VGA16=y that is
> the cause but I am not positive...
Well I am now :-) Thanks for the tip. It is working now.
Regards,
--
Sridhar M.A.
Ignorance is bliss.
On October 24, 2003 01:32 pm, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> I am currently trying out 2.6-test8. I am able to compile and install
> it. There are apparently no problems in running the same. I could even
> get the nvidia driver working after applying the patches from
minion.de.
> In all, I have a fully fun
On October 4, 2003 07:46 pm, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have kernel version 2.6-test6 installed on my Dell Inspiron 5150. I can
> access my USB mouse via /dev/input/mice and my touchpad via the event
> device and a special Xfree86 driver for the touchpad.
>
> I'm wondering if some of u guy
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:46:03 +0200, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> On Sunday 21 September 2003 13:16, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I tired to install a 2.6.0-test4 (debain release) kernel. After the
>> reboot i was not able to use the modutils (and all modules) at all. It
[...]
>
> Ok i found
On Sunday 21 September 2003 13:16, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi
>
> I tired to install a 2.6.0-test4 (debain release) kernel. After the reboot
> i was not able to use the modutils (and all modules) at all. It says that
> "QM_MODULES" is not implementet. After some googling around i know that
> mod
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 04:54:22PM +0200, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> I can't open an xterm, not even as root. As regular user there is a lot of
> disk activity and then the terminal window fails to open.
Did you build in pty support? Xterm and friends care about that.
> Please CC me as
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:09:32AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 06:34:21AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> >
> >2. In /etc/modutils, I have an alias for my nic as
> > alias eth0 8139too
> >
> Roughly speaking, what used to be /etc/modutils for 2
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 06:34:21AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
>
>2. In /etc/modutils, I have an alias for my nic as
> alias eth0 8139too
>
Roughly speaking, what used to be /etc/modutils for 2.4 is
/etc/modprobe.d for 2.6.
--
Shaul Karl,shaulk @ actcom . net . il
--
> "Sridhar" == Sridhar M A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sridhar> On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 11:33:51AM +0900, Nick Hastings wrote:
>> echo "8139too" >> /etc/modules
>>
Sridhar> That is the solution similar to what I have for my cd-writer
Sridhar> (ide-scsi). But I am curious
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 11:33:51AM +0900, Nick Hastings wrote:
>
> echo "8139too" >> /etc/modules
>
That is the solution similar to what I have for my cd-writer (ide-scsi).
But I am curious to know why it fails under 2.6 and works under 2.4.x.
Should eth0 be `defined' anywhere for the ke
Hi,
* Sridhar M.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030901 10:36]:
> I thought of trying out the 2.6.0-test4 kernel. I noticed a couple of
> problems with it which I am giving below.
>
>2. In /etc/modutils, I have an alias for my nic as
> alias eth0 8139too
>
> If I do a modprobe eth0,
--- Shaul Karl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 12:58:50 -0700 (PDT), James
> Horey wrote:
>
> > mount: /dev2/root2 is not a valid block device
> > mount: /dev2/root2 is not a valid block device
> > mount: you must specify the filesystem type
> > pivot_root: No such file or direct
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 12:58:50 -0700 (PDT), James Horey wrote:
> mount: /dev2/root2 is not a valid block device
> mount: /dev2/root2 is not a valid block device
> mount: you must specify the filesystem type
> pivot_root: No such file or directory
> /sbin/init: 196: cannot open dev/console: No such f
92 matches
Mail list logo
