input on my video
> card, so I use the hdmi connector. The monitor did not include a vga-to-dvi
> adapter.
>
> When replacing my old monitor, i used the the aticonfig utility to generate
> a new xorg.conf as I've done in the past, and while the monitor was usable,
> I am stuck
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:47:04 -0500, Mike Bailey wrote:
>
> Sure enough, switching to the Vesa driver makes the entirety of the
> monitor functional, and performance is pretty fine as well. Thanks a lot
> for your help.
>
Are you sure, that you are using native resolution of monitor?
--
V
t; I am stuck with a problem where the screen size
> is limited to about the size of my old 24" monitor, with black space
> surrounding the entire usable screen.
>
> If I send an ctrl+alt+f2 to switch to tty2, I am able to use the
> entirety of the monitor, which tells me that this
A quick Google returns this interesting link:
http://forums.amd.com/game/messageview.cfm?catid=440&threadid=168568&messid=1324412&parentid=1322139&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Branch
indicating even the Windows AMD driver has trouble.
Have you tried the vesa driver as a test?
Wow! I didn't come across
On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 09:23 -0500, Mike Bailey wrote:
> > Is it a multisync monitor? You perhaps need to configure the monitor's
> > settings on the monitor.
> >
> > When using the GUI the frequencies of my monitor are 81.9KHz/89.9Hz, if
> > I switch to tty2 the frequencies are 48.3KHz/59.9Hz on a
A quick Google returns this interesting link:
http://forums.amd.com/game/messageview.cfm?catid=440&threadid=168568&messid=1324412&parentid=1322139&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Branch
indicating even the Windows AMD driver has trouble.
Have you tried the vesa driver as a test?
Wow! I didn't come across
Is it a multisync monitor? You perhaps need to configure the monitor's
settings on the monitor.
When using the GUI the frequencies of my monitor are 81.9KHz/89.9Hz, if
I switch to tty2 the frequencies are 48.3KHz/59.9Hz on an Arch Linux
install using the radeon driver.
My multisync monitor remem
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 08:03:56AM -0500, Mike Bailey wrote:
> Hello all,
> Last week I bought myself a new monitor to replace my old 24" monitor. The
> new monitor is a Samsung S27C500, which is connected via hdmi. The monitor
> has two inputs: one hdmi, and one vga. I do not have a VGA input on m
On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 08:03 -0500, Mike Bailey wrote:
> If I send an ctrl+alt+f2 to switch to tty2, I am able to use the
> entirety of the monitor, which tells me that this is an issue somewhere
> in X.
Is it a multisync monitor? You perhaps need to configure the monitor's
settings on the monito
d not
include a vga-to-dvi adapter.
When replacing my old monitor, i used the the aticonfig utility to
generate a new xorg.conf as I've done in the past, and while the monitor
was usable, I am stuck with a problem where the screen size is limited
to about the size of my old 24" moni
On 2009/04/26 15:42 (GMT-0700) Andrew Porter composed:
...
> Section "Device"
> Identifier "Configured Video Device"
> Driver "radeon"
> BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
> VideoRam32768
> EndSection
...
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-kde/2008-12/msg0006
In <200904270054.n3r0sfgb029...@tdl.com>, Andrew Porter wrote:
>Thnks much --- so who in debian.org will be integrating
>the latest (1.7) x.org / libxrandr2 into Lenny updates?
>And any idea of how to delicately ask when, without
>seeming too impatient?
As this is a "new" feature--a feature Lenny
"Boyd Stephen Smith Jr." wrote:
> In , Andrew Porter wrote:
> >Lenny as it came to me has xorg version 1:7.3+18 ,
> >so it's presumably not because the version was too old.
>
> No, it probably is. I think that is considered "1.5". Sid now has 1:7.4+1
> which is considered "1.6".
> --
> Boyd S
In , Andrew Porter wrote:
>Lenny as it came to me has xorg version 1:7.3+18 ,
>so it's presumably not because the version was too old.
No, it probably is. I think that is considered "1.5". Sid now has 1:7.4+1
which is considered "1.6".
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =.
b.
Lenny as it came to me has xorg version 1:7.3+18 ,
so it's presumably not because the version was too old.
--- Andrew Porter, a...@jedp.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2009/04/26 15:42 (GMT-0700) Andrew Porter composed:
> In Debian Lenny, newly installed:
> Wanted a virtual X screen size
> bigger than the physical screen size;
...
> This is the xorg.conf as I attempted
> to get it to produce a virtual screen size
> bigger than the ph
In Debian Lenny, newly installed:
Wanted a virtual X screen size
bigger than the physical screen size;
The machine is a Shuttle Xpc.
output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 661FX/M661FX/M661MX Host
(rev 11)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Silicon
On Thu June 1 2006 05:41 am, Juha Tuuna wrote:
> On Thursday, 1. June 2006 00:33, Sjoerd Hiemstra wrote:
> > Alan Ianson wrote:
> > > On this particular machine I am working on I get a text screen size of
> > > 80x25. I'd like to change it to 80x30, or perhaps I n
On Thursday, 1. June 2006 00:33, Sjoerd Hiemstra wrote:
> Alan Ianson wrote:
> > On this particular machine I am working on I get a text screen size of
> > 80x25. I'd like to change it to 80x30, or perhaps I need a 640x480
> > frame buffer. Is there a way I can change
Alan Ianson wrote:
> On this particular machine I am working on I get a text screen size of
> 80x25. I'd like to change it to 80x30, or perhaps I need a 640x480
> frame buffer. Is there a way I can change that from the command line,
> or in grub's menu.list maybe?
Yes, wit
On this particular machine I am working on I get a text screen size of 80x25.
I'd like to change it to 80x30, or perhaps I need a 640x480 frame buffer. Is
there a way I can change that from the command line, or in grub's menu.list
maybe? I've taken a look but can't seem to
(For completion: My monitor was only showing me some of the screen (I.
E.: The image was in a black box). I increased the image's size via
the On Screen Display of my Monitor.)
Alright. I'm going to say this and I feel kind of bad. I got rather
fed up with a small screen so I enlarged it on my OSD
David R. Litwin wrote:
Hello David,
I know it isn't the Monitor because I screwed up a bit when
re-installing. It asks the default size and I gave one that was once
size too big.
Good quality CRTs will handle this, but I must have missed a previous
post with this detail.
I found the said
On 31/07/05, David R. Litwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 31/07/05, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > David R. Litwin wrote:
> >
> > >On 31/07/05, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>David R. Litwin wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>I know it isn't the Monitor because
On 31/07/05, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David R. Litwin wrote:
>
> >On 31/07/05, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>David R. Litwin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>I know it isn't the Monitor because I screwed up a bit when
> >>>re-installing. It asks the default size and I ga
David R. Litwin wrote:
>On 31/07/05, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>David R. Litwin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I know it isn't the Monitor because I screwed up a bit when
>>>re-installing. It asks the default size and I gave one that was once
>>>size too big.
>>>
>>>
>>You can also
David R. Litwin wrote:
>On 31/07/05, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>David R. Litwin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I found the said file and the bits pertaining. But, there seem to be
>>>quite a few. Should I change them all or only some?
>>>
>>>
>>Be aware that if you manually tweak this
The file has to be manually tweeked and tweeked and
tweeked.
Herman
--- "David R. Litwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:26:50 -0400
> From: "David R. Litwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian users
> Subject: Re: Screen Size
&
On 31/07/05, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David R. Litwin wrote:
>
> >I know it isn't the Monitor because I screwed up a bit when
> >re-installing. It asks the default size and I gave one that was once
> >size too big.
> >
> >I found the said file and the bits pertaining. But, there seem
David R. Litwin wrote:
>I know it isn't the Monitor because I screwed up a bit when
>re-installing. It asks the default size and I gave one that was once
>size too big.
>
>I found the said file and the bits pertaining. But, there seem to be
>quite a few. Should I change them all or only some?
>
>S
I know it isn't the Monitor because I screwed up a bit when
re-installing. It asks the default size and I gave one that was once
size too big.
I found the said file and the bits pertaining. But, there seem to be
quite a few. Should I change them all or only some?
Section "Monitor"
Identif
David R. Litwin wrote:
>My screen is currently giving me a size of 800 x 600 70MgH. I would
>like to change this to the one under (7 or 6 some thing, I believe).
>
>
640x480?
Look in /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 (or xorg.conf, depending) to make sure
this size is defined in that file.
>However, when I
My screen is currently giving me a size of 800 x 600 70MgH. I would
like to change this to the one under (7 or 6 some thing, I believe).
However, when I use the screen re-sizer (Or go in to KDE's Control
Centre, Peripherals, Monitor and change it there), it simply causes
the picture to get bigger b
On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 05:35:50PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Changed monitor and am back running X after a dpkg-reconfigure
> xserver-xfree86.
>
> Problem is the windows are way too big for the 1024 x 780 resolution,
> and the desktop does not fit into the screen.
does the screen scroll
On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 05:35:50PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Changed monitor and am back running X after a dpkg-reconfigure
> xserver-xfree86.
>
> Problem is the windows are way too big for the 1024 x 780 resolution,
> and the desktop does not fit into the screen.
does the screen scroll
Changed monitor and am back running X after a dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86.
Problem is the windows are way too big for the 1024 x 780 resolution,
and the desktop does not fit into the screen.
X is started from GDM
If I startx -- -depth 24 as root
it’s fine, just how it should be.
I found my solution here:
http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/archive/debian/testing/2003/05/msg00036.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On (07/06/04 17:39), Jacob Friis Larsen wrote:
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Jacob Friis Larsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 17:39:26 +0200
> Subject: Larger screen size
>
> I am currently only able to use 800x600.
> When I use Knoppix I can use a la
Jacob Friis Larsen wrote:
I am currently only able to use 800x600.
When I use Knoppix I can use a larger screen.
How can I get the same options as when I use Knoppix?
Could I copy some files from Knoppix?
Thanks,
Jacob
Just run "xf86config" in console mode and when it asks you the
resolution you
I am currently only able to use 800x600.
When I use Knoppix I can use a larger screen.
How can I get the same options as when I use Knoppix?
Could I copy some files from Knoppix?
Thanks,
Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
ooDoo 3 TV-Out)
and Virtual Screen size:
1280x1024
In GNOME I have set the screen size 1024x768 - I have 17" monitor and
1280x1024 is too much, it is good as virtual. But. I have to put 1280x1024
in allowed resolutions, in other case xrandr don't want to work. (I need
xrandr to switch
for my VooDoo 3 TV-Out)
> and Virtual Screen size:
> 1280x1024
>
> In GNOME I have set the screen size 1024x768 - I have 17" monitor and
> 1280x1024 is too much, it is good as virtual. But. I have to put 1280x1024
> in allowed resolutions, in other case xrandr don't want t
Hello.
Recently I found I couldn't log in into GNOME. I found the reason. In
XF86Config-4 I have defined resolutions:
1024x768, 1280x1024, 800x600, 800x600PAL (this is for my VooDoo 3 TV-Out)
and Virtual Screen size:
1280x1024
In GNOME I have set the screen size 1024x768 - I have 17&quo
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:50:47PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On 05/06/02 Mark Roach did speaketh:
>
> > AFAIK the virtual size stays the same for the entire X session, only the
> > viewable resolution is changable via the ctrl-alt-+/- key combo. Unless
> > you have a need to change resolu
On 05/06/02 Mark Roach did speaketh:
> AFAIK the virtual size stays the same for the entire X session, only the
> viewable resolution is changable via the ctrl-alt-+/- key combo. Unless
> you have a need to change resolution on the fly a lot, you could create
> two different scripts that invoke X
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 18:59, Ross Boylan wrote:
> When I use ctl-alt-+ to cycle through the modes in XFree86 (v 4.1 on
> woody) it does not change the virtual desktop size. So when I go from
> 1152 x 864 to 1024 x 768 some of the virtual desktop doesn't fit, and
> I have to scroll around.
>
> Is
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 18:59, Ross Boylan wrote:
> When I use ctl-alt-+ to cycle through the modes in XFree86 (v 4.1 on
> woody) it does not change the virtual desktop size. So when I go from
> 1152 x 864 to 1024 x 768 some of the virtual desktop doesn't fit, and
> I have to scroll around.
>
> Is
When I use ctl-alt-+ to cycle through the modes in XFree86 (v 4.1 on
woody) it does not change the virtual desktop size. So when I go from
1152 x 864 to 1024 x 768 some of the virtual desktop doesn't fit, and
I have to scroll around.
Is there a way to avoid this? I have added
Vi
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 12:01:44AM +0100, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 03:11:26PM -0600, Dave Price wrote:
> > [ snip ]
>
> AFAIR (Haven't used a latitude for 'bout a year), Fn+F7 should help you
> out here. It might not be F7, but it *should* be labelled "Font". The
> BIOS s
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 03:11:26PM -0600, Dave Price wrote:
> [ snip ]
>
> Only question is - does anyone know what linux boot commands i need to
> use to get the console screens to use the whole display - right now they
> are 80x25, but with a ~1.5" margin all the way around the border -
AFAIR
also sprach Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.04.17.2311 +0200]:
> Only question is - does anyone know what linux boot commands i need to
> use to get the console screens to use the whole display - right now they
> are 80x25, but with a ~1.5" margin all the way around the border -
install the
On Wed, 2002-04-17 at 14:11, Dave Price wrote:
> Only question is - does anyone know what linux boot commands i need to
> use to get the console screens to use the whole display - right now they
> are 80x25, but with a ~1.5" margin all the way around the border -
On most laptops that's up to you
Well, so far we have much success.
I have now successfully installed woody from the new isolinux minicd
that is at debian.org alongside win2k on a small partition borrowed from
the win-os hard drive.
All is well - the Xirxom pc-card and dhcp 'just worked' and we are up
and running with a nice lit
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >> I've been recommended to use
> >>
> >>'dpkg -reconfigure xserver-xfree'
> >>
> >>in order to sync virtual and monitor screen sizes.
> >>
> >>However, doing so gives me the message
> >>
> >>" "xserver-xfree86" is not installed or does not use debconf"
> >>
> >>What would be the c
Hi,
I've been recommended to use
'dpkg -reconfigure xserver-xfree'
in order to sync virtual and monitor screen sizes.
However, doing so gives me the message
" "xserver-xfree86" is not installed or does not use debconf"
What would be the correct item to enter in the "dpkg -reconfigure"
Harry Henry Gebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I notice that no matter what size terminal window I run `man` in it appears
>to generate output for 80 column width. This is a little annoying when the
>window is wider than 80 columns; when the window is narrower than 80 it can
>be nearly unreadable. I
I notice that no matter what size terminal window I run `man` in it appears
to generate output for 80 column width. This is a little annoying when the
window is wider than 80 columns; when the window is narrower than 80 it can
be nearly unreadable. Is there a way to override this behavior?
--
Har
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 12:10:51PM -0800, Bill Wohler wrote:
> I just upgraded to X v4 (woody) and selected the mga driver for my
> Matrox Millenium G200. I have an NEC MultiSync 6FG (21") monitor. I
> now have two problems:
>
> 1. Large margins around the screen.
> 2. Incredible f
Fixed. Off by one error in xserver-xfree86. I'll post a bug presently.
My monitor manual says the horizontal refresh is from 27 to 79 kHz,
so I used 27 - 80 in XFConfig-4. Now I've got a rock-solid image at
75 Hz. And the monitor hasn't blown up yet. And surprise! the screen
went back to
Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Probably the new install wiped away your old settings, so it's now
> picking the first listed choice, or something like that. Try editing
> your configuration file, comparing with your old one if possible.
Thanks for all the suggestions guys.
My new
I have a G200 and NEC XV17. It works quite well, but I used the windows
settings to guide my X settings.
I see the mga_h1 error too, though no ill effects (unless this is
responsible for overlay mode not working). I filed a bug about it (87504)
which was reported upstream.
Probably the new
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 12:10:51PM -0800, Bill Wohler wrote:
> I just upgraded to X v4 (woody) and selected the mga driver for my
> Matrox Millenium G200. I have an NEC MultiSync 6FG (21") monitor. I
> now have two problems:
>
> 1. Large margins around the screen.
> 2. Incredible f
"S.Salman Ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bill> (WW) System lacks support for changing MTRRs
> ^
> Do you have support for MTRRs built into your kernel ? If not, recompile
> your kernel to include support for MTRRs (CONFIG_MTRR) and then
I just upgraded to X v4 (woody) and selected the mga driver for my
Matrox Millenium G200. I have an NEC MultiSync 6FG (21") monitor. I
now have two problems:
1. Large margins around the screen.
2. Incredible flicker.
At 1280x1024, there is now a large margin around the screen: 1
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 09:11:06PM -0600, Richard Cobbe wrote:
> Lo, on Tuesday, December 26, Lance Simmons did write:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 05:42:36PM -0800, Nate Amsden wrote:
> > > Lance Simmons wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Is
> > > &
- Original Message -
From: "Lance Simmons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Nate Amsden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 3:42 AM
Subject: Re: Changing screen size along with screen resolution?
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 05:42:36PM
It sounds like your problem is that you don't have 800x600 defined in your
XF86Config. I run at 16 bit color depth, so here is what I have:
Subsection "Display"
Depth 16
Modes "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480"
EndSubsection
The first resolution is the default resolution, the
Lo, on Tuesday, December 26, Lance Simmons did write:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 05:42:36PM -0800, Nate Amsden wrote:
> > Lance Simmons wrote:
> > >
> > > Is
> > > there a way to change resolution _and_ screen size at the same time?
> > >
> >
Lance Simmons wrote:
> Isn't there a way I can _start_ X at 800x600 without having to modify
> my XF86Config file? I'm willing to start a separate X session on
> another virtual terminal. Reading the man pages for xinit and startx
> hasn't enlightened me.
i suggest posting to one of the loki news
On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 05:42:36PM -0800, Nate Amsden wrote:
> Lance Simmons wrote:
> >
> > Is
> > there a way to change resolution _and_ screen size at the same time?
> >
> does the game support fullscreen?
Yes, it does. It's Heroes of Might and Magic 3, port
Lance Simmons wrote:
>
> I know how to change screen resolution using ctl-alt-plus or
> ctl-alt-minus, but the absolute size of the screen doesn't change. Is
> there a way to change resolution _and_ screen size at the same time?
>
> I usually use 1600x1200, but now I
I know how to change screen resolution using ctl-alt-plus or
ctl-alt-minus, but the absolute size of the screen doesn't change. Is
there a way to change resolution _and_ screen size at the same time?
I usually use 1600x1200, but now I'd like to run a linux game
fullscreen at 800x600. T
t; >> > Ok Guys,
>> >> > I got X Finally working mouse and all. But and you knew there had to be
>> >> > a
>> >> > butt. How can I change the screen size without going back into
>> >> > XF86Config.
>
>
>
> what abou
ouse and all. But and you knew there had to be a
> >> > butt. How can I change the screen size without going back into
> >> > XF86Config.
what about XF86Setup and just change the resolution?
>
>
On 15-May-2000 Ed Slocomb wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 01:57:54PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>>
>> On 15-May-2000 Jay Kelly wrote:
>> > Ok Guys,
>> > I got X Finally working mouse and all. But and you knew there had to be a
>> >
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 01:57:54PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 15-May-2000 Jay Kelly wrote:
> > Ok Guys,
> > I got X Finally working mouse and all. But and you knew there had to be a
> > butt. How can I change the screen size without going back in
On 15-May-2000 Jay Kelly wrote:
> Ok Guys,
> I got X Finally working mouse and all. But and you knew there had to be a
> butt. How can I change the screen size without going back into XF86Config. I
> am looking at 640x480 and would like 800x600. Will this be possible to
> chang
Ok Guys,
I got X Finally working mouse and all. But and you knew there had to be a
butt. How can I change the screen size without going back into XF86Config. I
am looking at 640x480 and would like 800x600. Will this be possible to
change without going into XF86Config?
Thanks Agian for all the
> hi
>
> I've installed xfree ver 3.3.6-6, still having problems though (original
> posting @ bottom of this e-mail). Have included the output from running
> 'startx' (thorough "startx &> startxout").
>
> I would be very grateful for any assistance ...
>
> ---
ing to keep the initial installation as simple as possible
as I hadn't installed Debian on a laptop previously (eg. running XF86_SVGA
server etc.). Machine video specs follow:
8 MB Video RAM
Max Res: SVGA - 1280 * 1024, Char. Matrix 8x16, Freq. Ver: 60Hz, Horiz:
48.3/60.0/68.7
wld like to run
hi
I've installed xfree ver 3.3.6-6, still having problems though. Have
included the output from running 'startx' (thorough "startx &> startxout").
Would be grateful for any assistance ...
XFree86 Version 3.3.6 / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6300)
Release Date
the position of the cursor and therefore the
screen size.
Then edit your XF86Config file by placing the resolution you
want to be first in the list.
Warning: If your X server locks up or your monitor starts
making funny noises (unlikely but possible) then you can use the
key combination of control
On Mon, Feb 22, 1999 at 09:53:06AM +1100, Stephen Lavelle wrote:
> How do I adjust the size of myscreen in X. Its too tall (vertical) and when
> I open some apps (Emacs, MAKE xCONFIG) i cannot see some parts of them.
> I think its currentlt set to 640x480 . also how do i get the output of the
> Xse
How do I adjust the size of myscreen in X. Its too tall (vertical) and when
I open some apps (Emacs, MAKE xCONFIG) i cannot see some parts of them.
I think its currentlt set to 640x480 . also how do i get the output of the
Xserver?
Regards
Stephen
Austanners Wet Blue Pty Ltd.
~ Australian Tanned We
> The X server is showing an 800x600 display resolution, but has
> (apparently) decided that the screen can only display 640x480, this
> leads to edges of windows running off the screen, etc.
I also had this problem and solved deleting all unwanted modes in
XF86Config. So a line like
Modes
to accomplish two things:
primarily - Get the "panning" feature turned back on
secondarily - figure out how to configure the X server such that it does
not need "virtual" windows space
- BOHICA
Dan Willard wrote:
> You should just have to set the acual screen size and the virtual
nd restarted X11, still had no
ability to pan to the virtual screen size. Rebooted, same issue: the
XF86Config file has been restored to the original and I still can't pan to
the edges of the virtual screen.
Help?!???
- BOHICA
"Robert V. MacQuarrie" wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, BOH
On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, BOHICA wrote:
>Currently the resolution is set to 800x600, but the display still thinks
>that it is in 640x480 mode. This causes a lot of dynamic scrolling to
>get to border bars, etc. When I had (*gasp*) Windows 95/98 on the
>laptop, 800x600 was small, but perfectly legible w
General question:
I have a Toshiba laptop (Portege 610CT)
I have v2.1 installed and running, X11 with fvwm2 running with good
screen resolution and 16bpp colors.
Currently the resolution is set to 800x600, but the display still thinks
that it is in 640x480 mode. This causes a lot of dynamic scr
On Fri, Dec 18, 1998 at 06:57:59PM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
>
> I have a Toshiba Satellite 4000CDT (TFT screen). In text mode only the middle
> part of the screen is visible, though in graphics mode the whole screen is
> used.
> There is an option in Hardware Setup to stretch the screen, b
On 19 Dec 1998q, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 1998 at 06:57:59PM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > I have a Toshiba Satellite 4000CDT (TFT screen). In text mode only the
> > middle
> > part of the screen is visible, though in graphics mode the whole screen is
> > used.
> > There is a
On Fri, Dec 18, 1998 at 06:57:59PM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> I have a Toshiba Satellite 4000CDT (TFT screen). In text mode only the middle
> part of the screen is visible, though in graphics mode the whole screen is
> used.
> There is an option in Hardware Setup to stretch the screen, but
I know this isn't of any help, but I have the same machine - and don't
experience the problems you're having - I have full screen in DOS, Win95 and
Linux. Although I do wish it support 800x600 resolution instead of 620x480 in
800x600 virtual screen mode.
-jay
I have a Toshiba Satellite 4000CDT (TFT screen). In text mode only the middle
part of the screen is visible, though in graphics mode the whole screen is used.
There is an option in Hardware Setup to stretch the screen, but this gives the
same number of lines, with double spacing.
This isn't reall
Nico Fritschi wrote:
>
>
> My next question is about Netscape 4.05 . When i set up my mail and news
> server i always get the message "unknown host mail.gmx.de" or
> "news.gmx.de". I tried that on- and off-line but both did not work. Do I
> have to list them in a config file somewhere?
>
it cou
Christopher Barry wrote:
> When I was using Windows 95 I downloaded the "power toy" quickres and I
> was able to switch between multiple color depths and resolutions on the
> fly and all the windows would properly resize themselves. If I was using
> 1600x1200 and with Netscape maximised on screen a
Hey, it works both ways. Say I'm in 1600x1200 and using Netscape and I'm
looking at cool screenshots of some guy's enlightenment or windowmaker
desktop and the jpg is 1600x1200. I can switch to 1800x1440 and Netscape
will be maximised for me when the mode switch is complete so that I can
see the en
On Sun, Jul 26, 1998 at 12:31:48PM -0700, Christopher Barry wrote:
> Netscape would automatically be maximised on screen. You don't need to
> cram 1024 points into 640, you just need the mode switching in X up to
> Windows 95 standards for God's sake so that it is intelligent enough to
> resize wi
Alexey Vyskubov wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 1998 at 07:21:47PM +0200, Nico Fritschi wrote:
> > when i change my screen resolution to a lower one i always get a screen
> > which is not fixed, this means I can scroll it around and i can't see
> > the whole screen. Is it possible to change that?
>
>
Nico Fritschi wrote:
>
> My next question is about Netscape 4.05 . When i set up my mail and news
> server i always get the message "unknown host mail.gmx.de" or
> "news.gmx.de". I tried that on- and off-line but both did not work. Do I
> have to list them in a config file somewhere?
>
Maybe you
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
