Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

Hi Thanks for your help and time. I really appreciate it. > Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 at 8:05 PM > From: l0f...@tuta.io > To: "Debian User" > Subject: Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of > software/security updates? > > Correction: I

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 08:40:23PM +0200, Stella Ashburne wrote: > Question: Instead of using "aptitude why unattended-upgrades" command, can I > use "apt why unattended-upgrades"? Well, try it and see. > I was told many years ago that the command "aptitude" was deprecated. You were lied to.

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

Hello, Thanks for your help and time. I really appreciate it. > Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 at 8:06 PM > From: "Greg Wooledge" > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of > software/security updates? > &

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

Hello, > Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 at 7:43 PM > From: l0f...@tuta.io > To: "Debian User" > Subject: Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of > software/security updates? > > > unattended-upgrades is not installed by default, so you insta

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 01:43:59PM +0200, l0f...@tuta.io wrote: > OK, here is my understanding of your situation. > > unattended-upgrades is not installed by default, so you installed that > package at some point because you were interested in applying upgrades > automatically. More likely, it

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

28 mai 2021, 13:43 de l0f...@tuta.io: > I think you won't update/upgrade automatically anymore (by the way you say > you haven't noticed this behavior so far), but time will confirm. > Correction: I meant if you still have updates/upgrades, then it shouldn't be because of package

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

p | grep -i APT::Periodic > > APT::Periodic ""; > APT::Periodic::Download-Upgradeable-Packages "0"; > APT::Periodic::Unattended-Upgrade "0"; > Good for you ("0" again). >> NB: Have you rebooted and observed the same behavior since your post

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

Hi > Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 at 4:09 AM > From: l0f...@tuta.io > To: "Debian User" > Subject: Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of > software/security updates? > > What you call "package" is actually a simple file righ

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

Hi, 27 mai 2021, 08:48 de rewe...@gmx.com: > Before I provide you the answers, please note that I had removed/deleted the > package called 50unattended-upgrades in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/ before my > original post in this mailing list. > What you call "package" is actually a simple file right? >

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 at 8:23 PM > From: l0f...@tuta.io > To: "Debian User" > Subject: Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of > software/security updates? > > Hi, > > Can you type the following commands in a terminal and giv

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

Hi, Can you type the following commands in a terminal and give us the results please (use `sudo` if necessary)? ls -al /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/ dpkg -l | grep -i unattended-upgrades cat /lib/systemd/system/apt-daily.timer cat /etc/systemd/system/apt-daily.timer.d/override.conf Best regards, l0f4r0

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

On Wed, 26 May 2021 03:38:36 +0200, Stella Ashburne typed 1. My OS stops downloading software and security updates silently in the background. It's called automatic downloads, am I right? I wish it to stop. 2. Debian stops giving me notifications that there are software updates available

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

I had already done that long before I posted my original question in this mailing list. > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 at 9:50 AM > From: "Jeremy Ardley" > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of >

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

On 26/5/21 9:38 am, Stella Ashburne wrote: Thanks for your reply, Keith. I'm sorry if my original question is ambiguous. Here's what I wish to happen: 1. My OS stops downloading software and security updates silently in the background. It's called automatic downloads, am I right? I wish

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

Thanks for your reply, Keith. I'm sorry if my original question is ambiguous. Here's what I wish to happen: 1. My OS stops downloading software and security updates silently in the background. It's called automatic downloads, am I right? I wish it to stop. 2. Debian stops giving me

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

On Tue, 25 May 2021 22:48:06 +0200 Stella Ashburne wrote: >>And yes, I manually perform "sudo apt update" and "sudo apt upgrade" >>about twice a day. Good Morning Stella If you are upgrading this often, why not get the bulk of the packages downloaded ready to install? I do that much

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

program runs on its defaults. > > I shall feedback to you if your suggestion works. > > By the way, is there a method to suppression notification of new > software and/or security updates? (I assume that if I can receive > notifications of software/security updates, it means that

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

Hi Greg By the way, is there a method to suppression notification of new software and/or security updates? (I assume that if I can receive notifications of software/security updates, it means that my OS is communicating with Debian servers in the background, without my knowledge. I don't like

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

Thanks for your reply. No, I haven't tried clearing the apt cache and shall let you know if my OS downloads software/security updates in the background. By the way, is there a method to suppression notification of new software and/or security updates? (I assume that if I can receive

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

tification of new software and/or security updates? (I assume that if I can receive notifications of software/security updates, it means that my OS is communicating with Debian servers in the background, without my knowledge. I don't like that.) Marcello > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 at 3

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:48:06PM +0200, Stella Ashburne wrote: > Thanks Kenneth for your reply. > > Your suggestion that I "apt-get purge unattended-upgrades" is intended to be > a one-off operation or must I perform it each time I log into my OS? >   > And yes, I manually perform "sudo apt

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

ice a day. Marcello     Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 at 3:05 AM From: "Kenneth Parker" To: "Debian Users" Subject: Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?   On Tue, May 25, 2021, 1:25 PM Stella Ashburne mailto:rewe...@gmx.com]> w

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

On Tue, 25 May 2021 19:25:01 +0200 Stella Ashburne wrote: > 2. I deleted the file 50unattended-upgrades located > in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/ > > In spite of the above two actions, Debian 10.9 still downloads > software and security updates for me automatically in the background.

Re: How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

above two actions, Debian 10.9 still downloads software > and security updates for me automatically in the background. Could someone > help me with a fix that really works? > One step I have taken is "apt-get purge unattended-upgrades". That said, I regularly update and upgrade my systems. > > Thanks. > > Marcello > Good luck! Kenneth Parker >

How do I permanently disable unattended downloads of software/security updates?

the URL below to see a screenshot of the Software Updates: https://ibb.co/bs7pF9q 2. I deleted the file 50unattended-upgrades located in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/ In spite of the above two actions, Debian 10.9 still downloads software and security updates for me automatically in the background. Coul

Re: testing security updates

On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 08:45:27 -0400 Greg Wooledge wrote: Hello Greg, >Yeah, I gave the (overly) simplified set of warnings. I'm sure we can all come up with so many different scenarios that this could run and run if we let it. Suffice to say, there are always exceptions that prove the rule.

Re: testing security updates

On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 10:52:16AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > Also, currently, digikam is not in testing. No big deal, I have it > installed and working. *However* if I had just installed testing, I > would get digikam from stable, because I use it daily, and can't do > certain things without

Re: testing security updates

Greg Wooledge wrote: > YOU DO NOT MIX TESTING WITH UNSTABLE. > If you use one of these, you use that one only. No mixing. > No Frankendebians. But you *can* mix Unstable with Testing. (Not the order here.) Normally no package from Testing will get pulled in, but sometimes this is the only

Re: testing security updates

Hi, Brad Rogers wrote: > > > If one uses sites such as spotify or amazon video to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > >...but why on earth would you want to do THAT? Eeeek... ;-) Brad Rogers wrote: > *I* don't; It's the kids. I wonder whether there is a Debian Developer willing to create a package which

Re: testing security updates

On Fri, 4 Oct 2019 12:14:00 +0200 wrote: Hello to...@tuxteam.de, >...but why on earth would you want to do THAT? Eeeek... ;-) *I* don't; It's the kids. Honest. :-) -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)radnever immediately apparent" Where

Re: testing security updates

On Fri, Oct 04, 2019 at 10:52:16AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:40:53 -0400 > Greg Wooledge wrote: > > Hello Greg, > > >YOU DO NOT MIX STABLE WITH TESTING. > > > >YOU DO NOT MIX STABLE WITH UNSTABLE. > > > >YOU DO NOT MIX TESTING WITH UNSTABLE. > > By and large, I agree. >

Re: testing security updates

On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:40:53 -0400 Greg Wooledge wrote: Hello Greg, >YOU DO NOT MIX STABLE WITH TESTING. > >YOU DO NOT MIX STABLE WITH UNSTABLE. > >YOU DO NOT MIX TESTING WITH UNSTABLE. By and large, I agree. I would add a few caveats, though. If one uses sites such as spotify or amazon

Re: testing security updates

On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 03:40:53PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: [...] > YOU DO NOT MIX STABLE WITH TESTING. > > YOU DO NOT MIX STABLE WITH UNSTABLE. > > YOU DO NOT MIX TESTING WITH UNSTABLE. Wow. I'd rather say: you do not "do not". Know the downsides, know what can break, and then, when it's

Re: testing security updates

On Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:40:53 -0400 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 08:35:32PM +0100, mick crane wrote: > > Debian web page about testing is saying that testing gets infrequent > > security updates > > It's more accurate to say that testing does not get A

Re: testing security updates

On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 08:54:37PM +0100, mick crane wrote: > yes sorry, I realized I made an error and should have typed > bullseye for main and unstable for security updates just after pressing > send. > but you say not to do that ? Correct. If you want to run unstable, just run unstable.

Re: testing security updates

realized I made an error and should have typed bullseye for main and unstable for security updates just after pressing send. but you say not to do that ? mick -- Key ID4BFEBB31

Re: testing security updates

On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 08:35:32PM +0100, mick crane wrote: > Debian web page about testing is saying that testing gets infrequent > security updates It's more accurate to say that testing does not get ANY security updates. Not in any realistic sense. Packages migrate from unstable into t

testing security updates

I didn't type previous correctly did I. that would be bullseye for main and unstable for security updates in sources.lists. Is that what people do ? mick -- Key ID4BFEBB31

testing security updates

hello, Debian web page about testing is saying that testing gets infrequent security updates and that you can get more frequent security updates from unstable. Is that what people do ? have buster for main and bullseye for security updates in sources.list ? mick -- Key ID4BFEBB31

Re: Security Updates

On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 08:00:51PM +0100, Marek Gráfel wrote: > I also tried the command via the apt-get update terminal, telling me that > the operation is declined. Make sure you run apt-get as root or with sudo: sudo apt-get update Then: sudo apt-get upgrade -- Nazar

Re: Security Updates

On 12/30/18 11:00 AM, Marek Gráfel wrote: I do not know English well, but I hope that the translation through Google Is there a Debian mailing list in your native language? https://lists.debian.org/completeindex.html David

Re: Security Updates

Marek Gráfel wrote: ... > I do not know English well, but I hope that the translation through Google > will be enough to lead me to write a procedure how to install security > updates, and please explain why your Debian freezes despite Linux Mintu? I > think Debian is higher than Linux

Security Updates

Good day. Please help. I have the Debian9.6 operating system installed from Cinnamon. Can I help you find and install security updates on my system? I looked at the Synaptic package manager, the apt package is installed there. I also tried the command via the apt-get update terminal, telling me

Re: stretch security updates

On 11/03/18 14:38, Felix Natter wrote: > hi, Hi, Felix. > I had a wrong configuration in sources.list (for about half a year :-(): > > deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main contrib non-free > deb-src http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main contrib non-free I am using

Re: stretch security updates

have some cloud systems that use the first form and I received all the expected security updates. > > But I still do not get the stretch 9.4 security updates, like > firefox-esr for example [1]. > > However, looking at the package status for firefox-esr [2], there does > not se

stretch security updates

[481 B] Es wurden 1.030 kB in 1 s geholt (664 kB/s). Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig But I still do not get the stretch 9.4 security updates, like firefox-esr for example [1]. However, looking at the package status for firefox-esr [2], there does not seem to be a [security] update

Re: Security updates for Chromium on Debian Jessie

ppened with the previous >>>> update. >>>> >>>> Maybe I'm missing something and Chromium on Jessie is no longer getting >>>> security updates? >>> It seems that the maintainer is overworked and cannot provide Jessie >>> updates for chromium an

Re: Security updates for Chromium on Debian Jessie

with the previous update. Maybe I'm missing something and Chromium on Jessie is no longer getting security updates? It seems that the maintainer is overworked and cannot provide Jessie updates for chromium anymore[1]. Somebody else said he might be looking at it[2], but that was six weeks ago

Re: Security updates for Chromium on Debian Jessie

e. >> >> Maybe I'm missing something and Chromium on Jessie is no longer getting >> security updates? > It seems that the maintainer is overworked and cannot provide Jessie > updates for chromium anymore[1]. Somebody else said he might be looking > at it[2], but that was six w

Re: Security updates for Chromium on Debian Jessie

ybe I'm missing something and Chromium on Jessie is no longer getting > security updates? It seems that the maintainer is overworked and cannot provide Jessie updates for chromium anymore[1]. Somebody else said he might be looking at it[2], but that was six weeks ago and nothing happened

Security updates for Chromium on Debian Jessie

security updates? Thanks in advance. Kind regards, Daniel signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Security updates (Was: (solved) how to roll back to jessie)

On 04/09/17 02:58, Long Wind wrote: > i do not install security update > and it not cause trouble for me Hello. I am wondering: Why do you choose to not to install security updates? There seems to be nothing to gain and much to lose with that choice. -- Do not eat animals; respect them

Re: How to keep Debian Linux patched with latest security updates automatically

On 2017-08-11, Herb Garcia <porta...@garlic.com> wrote: > I found this article on Linux Today. I know a few of us have asked > questions about this maybe this might clear up a few of them. > > http://www.linuxtoday.com/security/how-to-keep-debian-linux-patched-with-lates

How to keep Debian Linux patched with latest security updates automatically

I found this article on Linux Today. I know a few of us have asked questions about this maybe this might clear up a few of them. http://www.linuxtoday.com/security/how-to-keep-debian-linux-patched-with-latest-security-updates-automatically-170808131008.html I hope this helps -HP Garcia

Samba updates in Debian 9 and in Debian 8 security updates

, that mean that people cannot upgrade, and cannot reinstall, Samba. That Debian bug is #868353 ("samba-libs dependencies broken in jessie debian-security repo"). There is additional information in bug #868209 under "Samba security updates uninstallable due to broken dependency o

Re: Samba security updates held back on Jessie server

Fixed packages have been uploaded for Jessie and Stretch. On Jul 14, 2017 12:16 PM, "Jason Cohen" wrote: > You might want to forward this to 868...@bugs.debian.org. I reported the > issue I found and received a reply indicating that they are building new > packages but

Re: Samba security updates held back on Jessie server

You might want to forward this to 868...@bugs.debian.org. I reported the issue I found and received a reply indicating that they are building new packages but I'm not sure if these issues were also caught. On 07/14/2017 12:13 PM, Guy Marcenac wrote: > Le 14/07/2017 à 16:40, Jason Cohen a écrit

Re: Samba security updates held back on Jessie server

Le 14/07/2017 à 16:40, Jason Cohen a écrit : Yup, the issue appears to be that python-samba requires python-talloc 2.1.6 and only 2.1.2 is available in Jessie. This was probably a typo. The prior python-samba package only required 2.0.6. I've reported this to the bug tracker. hi, It

Re: Samba security updates held back on Jessie server

Yup, the issue appears to be that python-samba requires python-talloc 2.1.6 and only 2.1.2 is available in Jessie. This was probably a typo. The prior python-samba package only required 2.0.6. I've reported this to the bug tracker. jason@storage-server:~$ apt show python-samba -a Package:

Samba security updates held back on Jessie server

Hello everyone, I attempted to update my Jessie server this morning after seeing the Samba DSA. However, it appears that there are unmet dependencies that are causing several of the samba packages to be held back. Anyone seeing this or know of a resolution? 12 packages can be upgraded. Run

Finding a good compromise in automating security updates

Hi list, I want to automate security updates on Stretch desktops and servers, using unattended-upgrades. I remember that under Wheezy I was receiving an email when my intervention was needed (i.e. when a WARNING was written in the log file). I can't get this anymore with my current testing

Re: Security Updates

bian.org/releases/stable/errata> states: >> >>"If you use APT, add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list to be >> able >>to access the latest security updates: >> >>deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free

Re: Security Updates

gt;> >> This page <https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/errata> states: >>> >> >>> >> "If you use APT, add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list to >>> >> be able >>> >> to access the latest security updat

Re: Security Updates

uestions >because he considers them irrelevant to his original question. > >Lisi Of course, that is not what I said at all. Here is a copy of the message I sent to Lisi: - To: Lisi Reisz <lisi.re...@gmail.com>

Re: Security Updates

On Wednesday 31 August 2016 16:16:45 Larry Dighera wrote: > Have you even looked at the information here: > ?  After reading > that announcement, how can you continue to insist that I am not running > Debian Jessie? That page (URL)

Re: Security Updates

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 08:16:45AM -0700, Larry Dighera wrote: > Have you even looked at the information here: > ? After reading > that announcement, how can you continue to insist that I am not running Debian > Jessie? 1) It's not on

Re: Security Updates

t; wrote: >> >> >On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:58:47PM -0700, Larry Dighera wrote: >> >> >> >> This page <https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/errata> states: >> >> >> >> "If you use APT, add the following l

Re: Security Updates

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:18 PM Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 31 August 2016 10:39:53 Lisi Reisz wrote: > > Since you are not replying to anyhting, you may not be subscribed, > > I had a reply off list that said that Larry is not replying to our > questions > because he

Re: Security Updates

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:58:47PM -0700, Larry Dighera wrote: This page <https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/errata> states: "If you use APT, add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list to be able to access the latest security updates: deb http://security.debian.

Re: Security Updates

ge <https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/errata> states: > >> > >> "If you use APT, add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list to be > >> able > >> to access the latest security updates: > >> > >> deb http://secur

Re: Security Updates

is what I said again: > > On Tuesday 30 August 2016 20:58:47 Larry Dighera wrote: > > This page <https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/errata> states: > > > > "If you use APT, add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list to > > be able to access

Re: Security Updates

etc/apt/sources.list to be > able to access the latest security updates: > > deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free > > After that, run apt-get update followed by apt-get upgrade." > > Adding that entry to /etc/apt/sources.list on the

Re: Security Updates

On Tuesday 30 August 2016 20:58:47 Larry Dighera wrote: > This page <https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/errata> states: > > "If you use APT, add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list to be > able to access the latest security updates: > > deb http:

Re: Security Updates

lowing line to /etc/apt/sources.list to >> be >> able >> to access the latest security updates: >> >> deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free >> >> After that, run apt-get update followed by apt-get upgrade." >&

Re: Security Updates

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:58:47PM -0700, Larry Dighera wrote: > > This page <https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/errata> states: > > "If you use APT, add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list to be > able > to access the latest securi

Re: Security Updates

Dighera <ldigh...@att.net> wrote: > > This page <https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/errata> states: > > "If you use APT, add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list to be > able > to access the latest security updates: > > deb http://securit

Security Updates

This page <https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/errata> states: "If you use APT, add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list to be able to access the latest security updates: deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free After that,

Re: Security updates mirror

ecall seeing the security updates listed in there last time I looked (the very last Japan mirror includes them) -- that must be the server I was remembering. Am I reading that right, that it says I shouldn't be using ftp.jp.debian.org <http://ftp.jp.debian.org> as a source, but rather

Re: Security updates mirror

Thanks, yes it is. I don't recall seeing the security updates listed in there last time I looked (the very last Japan mirror includes them) -- that must be the server I was remembering. Am I reading that right, that it says I shouldn't be using ftp.jp.debian.org as a source, but rather hard-coding

Re: Security updates mirror

On 17/04/2016 12:36, Mark Fletcher wrote: Hello A while back I remember seeing an announcement about a security.debian.org mirror in Japan, but I've misplaced the announcement. Doing aptitude update when you are in Japan and regular old security.debian.org

Security updates mirror

Hello A while back I remember seeing an announcement about a security.debian.org mirror in Japan, but I've misplaced the announcement. Doing aptitude update when you are in Japan and regular old security.debian.org is in your sources.list is a slow process (works fine, but slow) -- if there is a

Re: Iceweasel security updates?

On 04/12/2016 12:08 PM, The Wanderer wrote The Firefox development process follows a type of cascading release: http://www.askvg.com/mozilla-updates-firefox-update-channels-nightly-aurora-beta-and-release/ There are nightly builds, which are compiled every night from the public source tree

Re: Iceweasel security updates?

On 04/12/2016 12:16 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote: Aurora is alpha and will be 47 - a long way from release-ready - and beta is almost release-ready, so probably 46. If you had trouble with esr45, why not try release? It should be up to date and stable. esr45 is supposed to be 45 long term support -

Re: Iceweasel security updates?

s, so I'd like to stick with 38.7.1 (as it > >>> appears to be more compatible with Jessie) but I'm curious about > >>> the security updates to it. > >> > >> Would firefox-esr (same site) solve that? I wouldn't bank on many > >> updates for iceweasel no

Re: Iceweasel security updates?

r issues with choppy videos in Youtube using > >> Firefox 45, but not with Iceweasel 38.7.1. I've since done a Debian > >> re-install and I want to start fresh using optimal applications, so I'd > >> like to stick with 38.7.1 (as it appears to be more compatible with &

Re: Iceweasel security updates?

nced major issues with choppy videos in >>> Youtube using Firefox 45, but not with Iceweasel 38.7.1. I've >>> since done a Debian re-install and I want to start fresh using >>> optimal applications, so I'd like to stick with 38.7.1 (as it >>> appears to be mor

Re: Iceweasel security updates?

done a Debian re-install and I want to start fresh using optimal applications, so I'd like to stick with 38.7.1 (as it appears to be more compatible with Jessie) but I'm curious about the security updates to it. Would firefox-esr (same site) solve that? I wouldn't bank on many updates

Re: Iceweasel security updates?

eleased on 3/16/16); I therefore assume > that security updates will be continuously provided for it until it > reaches end of life, after which I would move to the next browser > version that Debian officially supports. > > Is it therefore safe to assume that Iceweasel 38.7.1 wil

Re: Iceweasel security updates?

>> whether Iceweasel 38.7.1 is secure enough for online banking... or > >> whether I'm just being too paranoid! > >> > >> The Firefox website says that Firefox 38.7.1 is an ESR release (in fact > >> it was evidently just released on 3/16/16); I therefore assu

Re: Iceweasel security updates?

out of date and not supported, FWIW, it' frequent to get this message regardless of your browser's version, simply because they don't recognize "Iceweasel", as opposed to "Firefox". > Is it therefore safe to assume that Iceweasel 38.7.1 will be receiving all > relevant/important se

Re: Iceweasel security updates?

therefore assume that security updates will be continuously provided for it until it reaches end of life, after which I would move to the next browser version that Debian officially supports. Is it therefore safe to assume that Iceweasel 38.7.1 will be receiving all relevant/important security upda

Re: Iceweasel security updates?

eleased on 3/16/16); I therefore assume that > security updates will be continuously provided for it until it reaches > end of life, after which I would move to the next browser version that > Debian officially supports. > > Is it therefore safe to assume that Iceweasel 38.7.1 wil

Iceweasel security updates?

is secure enough for online banking... or whether I'm just being too paranoid! The Firefox website says that Firefox 38.7.1 is an ESR release (in fact it was evidently just released on 3/16/16); I therefore assume that security updates will be continuously provided for it until it reaches e

Re: Cinnamon and security updates

8, I don't get warnings when there are security updates. Is there a way to add this? With regards, Paul van der Vlis. While I don't know about cinnamon, I get my updates from the mailing list: https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/ What I mean is a GUI for simple upgrading

Bericht bij security updates

Hallo, In het verleden gebruikte ik Gnome als desktop, maar de laatste tijd ook een paar andere desktops. Vooral Cinnamon en XFCE. Nu kom ik er door schade en schande achter dat deze geen melding geven als er security updates zijn. Dit was ik wel gewend van Gnome. Het is mogelijk de security

Re: Cinnamon and security updates

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:54:10AM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Op 18-05-15 om 23:11 schreef Ralph Katz: On 05/18/2015 03:30 PM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Hello, When using a Cinnamon desktop in Debian 8, I don't get warnings when there are security updates. Is there a way to add

Re: Cinnamon and security updates

Op 19-05-15 om 17:45 schreef Ralph Katz: On 05/19/2015 03:17 AM, D.E. Bil wrote: I'd install update-notifier (i.e. packagekit) if I wanted such a feature. Not sure if Cinnamon supports it, though. - From ~$ apt-cache show unattended-upgrades Description-en: automatic installation of

Re: Cinnamon and security updates

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/19/2015 03:17 AM, D.E. Bil wrote: I'd install update-notifier (i.e. packagekit) if I wanted such a feature. Not sure if Cinnamon supports it, though. - From ~$ apt-cache show unattended-upgrades Description-en: automatic installation of

Re: Cinnamon and security updates

Op 19-05-15 om 09:17 schreef D.E. Bil: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:54:10AM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Op 18-05-15 om 23:11 schreef Ralph Katz: On 05/18/2015 03:30 PM, Paul van der Vlis wrote: Hello, When using a Cinnamon desktop in Debian 8, I don't get warnings when there are security

Cinnamon and security updates

Hello, When using a Cinnamon desktop in Debian 8, I don't get warnings when there are security updates. Is there a way to add this? With regards, Paul van der Vlis. -- Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer, Groningen https://www.vandervlis.nl/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >