On 8/27/22 12:21, Stefan Monnier wrote:
What sort of hoops would I have to take a running swan dive thru to
have cura, on this machine, directly drive /sshnet/rock64/dev/ttyACM0,
my Prusa MK3S+ printer? I'm already logged into it over my local net
twice and it would sure save me a lot of sneakern
Greetings all;
My local home network is all behind a router running dd-wrt. sitting in
this chair,
3 rooms away from a rock64 running armbian, I can see the rock64's
/dev/ttyACM0, owned
by root:dialout. I am a member of that group and logged into it from
here. My home net
is 100% host file b
Hi.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:27:43AM +0200, Martin wrote:
> It's the ibus...something.
> No idea what this does¹, but disabling/uninstalling this does the trick.
Long story short, unless you're writing in Chinese, Japanese or Korean -
you don't need ibus.
Reco
It's the ibus...something.
No idea what this does¹, but disabling/uninstalling this does the trick.
1) I know, there is documentation...
On 2019.04.08 14:25, Dan Ritter wrote:
IBM Buckling Spring: nobody knows, but there are a lot of
keyboards still working 25-30 years later.
Cherry: 50 million.
https://www.cherrymx.de/_Resources/Persistent/e005dff11a2e406babe9e8718fec9fc8835bb9ce/EN_CHERRY_MX_BLUE_RGB.pdf
Kailh: 50 - 80 millio
rlhar...@oplink.net wrote:
> On 2019.04.08 05:29, Martin wrote:
> > since a few days, my qq(´) and qq(´)¹ don't work with a single
> > press. I have to press twice.
>
> The problem most likely is oxidation of the electrical contacts of the key
> switch. The silver or gold plating of the contact
On 2019.04.08 05:29, Martin wrote:
since a few days, my qq(´) and qq(´)¹ don't work with a single
press. I have to press twice.
The problem most likely is oxidation of the electrical contacts of the
key switch. The silver or gold plating of the contact surfaces may be
compromised by mechani
Am 08.04.19 um 14:05 schrieb Eike Lantzsch:
> On Monday, April 8, 2019 12:29:44 PM -04 Martin wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> since a few days, my qq(´) and qq(´)¹ don't work with a single press. I have
>> to press twice. Who can tell me why?
>> And, ho do I get my old single press behavior back?
>> Sorry
On Monday, April 8, 2019 12:29:44 PM -04 Martin wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> since a few days, my qq(´) and qq(´)¹ don't work with a single press. I have
> to press twice. Who can tell me why?
> And, ho do I get my old single press behavior back?
> Sorry I don't get this keyboard magic in this life...
>
Am 08.04.19 um 12:43 schrieb Markus Schönhaber:
> Martin, 8.4.2019 12:29 +0200:
>
>> since a few days, my qq(´) and qq(´)¹ don't work with a single press. I have
>> to press twice.
>> Who can tell me why?
>> And, ho do I get my old single press behavior back?
>> Sorry I don't get this keyboard ma
Martin, 8.4.2019 12:29 +0200:
> since a few days, my qq(´) and qq(´)¹ don't work with a single press. I have
> to press twice.
> Who can tell me why?
> And, ho do I get my old single press behavior back?
> Sorry I don't get this keyboard magic in this life...
>
> 1) On a German keyboard, it is t
Hi list,
since a few days, my qq(´) and qq(´)¹ don't work with a single press. I have to
press twice.
Who can tell me why?
And, ho do I get my old single press behavior back?
Sorry I don't get this keyboard magic in this life...
1) On a German keyboard, it is the key left of the backspace.
Tha
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:08:06PM +, Joe wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> anyway, I didn't mean to offend, and I apologise.
>
> No offence taken, no apology necessary. If you can't talk straight on
> Usenet, where can you? There's a fairly broad line between robust
> discussion and d
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
anyway, I didn't mean to offend, and I apologise.
No offence taken, no apology necessary. If you can't talk straight on
Usenet, where can you? There's a fairly broad line between robust
discussion and deliberate insult, which isn't often crossed here.
Joe
--
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 07:16:03PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> I was just pointing out that the OP above was complaining
>> about it not working in sid... which is pretty standard expectation
>> for Debian behavior.
>
> Yes, I know what to expect with Sid, which I've been
El vie, 26-10-2007 a las 17:46 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty escribió:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 07:16:03PM +0100, Joe wrote:
>
> > Yes, I know what to expect with Sid, which I've been running since
> > before Sarge was released, and this isn't it. Sid is for incorporating
> > new software variants i
apt-get install lshw
this package show list all hardware
here i show an example:
#: lshw | less
next you find in less "/network"
*network
description: Ethernet interface
product: 88E8053 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller
vendor: Marvell Technology
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 07:16:03PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> Yes, I know what to expect with Sid, which I've been running since
> before Sarge was released, and this isn't it. Sid is for incorporating
> new software variants into a future Stable, and sorting out any
> integration issues, not for tro
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:35:10PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:23:38PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 08:48:39PM +0100, Joe wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
Now, if you actually had a piece of hardware that
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:35:10PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:23:38PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 08:48:39PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> > > Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >
> > >> Now, if you actually had a piece of hardware that _was_ fully
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:23:38PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 08:48:39PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> > Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>
> >> Now, if you actually had a piece of hardware that _was_ fully supported
> >> by the linux kernel without this mess, then you would get a
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 08:48:39PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>> Now, if you actually had a piece of hardware that _was_ fully supported
>> by the linux kernel without this mess, then you would get a functioning
>> eth0 which would then work just fine with the standard Debian netw
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 07:00:39PM -0700, francisco wrote:
El mi??, 24-10-2007 a las 10:11 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty escribi??:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:02:31AM +0200, Matthias Feichtinger wrote:
I had the same problem.
The mistake was made while installing.
It is not p
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 06:57:40AM -0700, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote:
> I wanted to thank everyone who responded to my
> questoin. Fortunately or unfortunately i was forced to
> reboot the machine for other reasons, and upon
> rebooting eth0 was there. Repeated suspends had no
> effect, i.e. eth0
I wanted to thank everyone who responded to my
questoin. Fortunately or unfortunately i was forced to
reboot the machine for other reasons, and upon
rebooting eth0 was there. Repeated suspends had no
effect, i.e. eth0 was still there (meaning that
suspending isnt what caused it to vanish).
Since i
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:45:54PM -0700, francisco wrote:
> El mi??, 24-10-2007 a las 22:27 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty escribi??:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 07:00:39PM -0700, francisco wrote:
> > > El mi??, 24-10-2007 a las 10:11 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty escribi??:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:
El mié, 24-10-2007 a las 22:27 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty escribió:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 07:00:39PM -0700, francisco wrote:
> > El mi??, 24-10-2007 a las 10:11 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty escribi??:
> > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:02:31AM +0200, Matthias Feichtinger wrote:
> > > > I had the same pro
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:27:02 -0400
"Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1.
> Looking in
> /usr/share/doc/linux-doc-2.6.18/Documentation/networking/ \
> bcm43xx.txt.gz it says its for Broadcom BCM43xx chips.
>
> It mentions needing a firmware file. I'm assuming
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 07:00:39PM -0700, francisco wrote:
> El mi??, 24-10-2007 a las 10:11 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty escribi??:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:02:31AM +0200, Matthias Feichtinger wrote:
> > > I had the same problem.
> > > The mistake was made while installing.
> > > It is not possib
El mié, 24-10-2007 a las 10:11 -0400, Douglas A. Tutty escribió:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:02:31AM +0200, Matthias Feichtinger wrote:
> > I had the same problem.
> > The mistake was made while installing.
> > It is not possible to change things, e.g. having to configure more
> > than one etherne
I had the same problem.
The mistake was made while installing.
It is not possible to change things, e.g. having to configure more
than one ethernetcard.
I made a script of my own need and everythings works as I wanted it
to work. So, first man ifconfig, then man route and if needed, you might
start
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Sackville-West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: Silly question: Where's eth0?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Andrew Sackville wrote:
> >personally, I think network-manager is more trouble
> than >its worth,
> >but that's jsut me.
>
> Im starting to feel that your right--when it works its
> nice but when it doesnt i never know what to d
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 02:54:39PM -0700, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote:
>
> And in response to Wayne's question:
>
> $ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules
> # This file was automatically generated by the
> /lib/udev/write_net_rules
> # program, probably run by the
> persistent-net-gener
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 02:54:39PM -0700, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote:
>
> $ dmesg | grep -i ^eth
> eth1: Coming out of suspend...
> eth1: no IPv6 routers present
>
Ok, your dmesg ring buffer has overwritten what was discovered at boot.
try:
# (unless you're in group admin, then its $)
# cat /
Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote:
Andrew Sackville wrote:
personally, I think network-manager is more trouble
than >its worth,
but that's jsut me.
Im starting to feel that your right--when it works its
nice but when it doesnt i never know what to do.
please provide the exact output of the follo
Andrew Sackville wrote:
>personally, I think network-manager is more trouble
than >its worth,
>but that's jsut me.
Im starting to feel that your right--when it works its
nice but when it doesnt i never know what to do.
>please provide the exact output of the following:
>dmesg | grep -i ^eth
$
On 10/23/07, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know this must be an incredibly dumb question, but i cant find my eth0
> interface.
>
> I normally use a WiFi connection on my laptop, running Etch with Gnome.
> But i just brought the computer into an office, plugged in an Ethernet
p (i.e. using ifup or ifconfig) just
> gave
> me "Ignoring unknown interface" or "No such device" errors. Also section
> 10.6.5.
> mentions network-manager as something that doesn't exist in Debian yet,
> although it clearly does,
> which is a further wo
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:22:56AM -0700, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> >> I know this must be an incredibly dumb question, but i cant find my
> >> eth0 interface.
> >>
personally, I think network-manager is more trouble tha
Debian yet,
although it clearly does,
which is a further worry because thats what im trying to use.
If its really there and i just cant see it, i apologize, but i did say it was a
"silly" question.
Jen
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> I know this must be an incredibly dumb question, but i cant find my
> eth0 interface.
>
> I normally use a WiFi connection on my laptop, running Etch with
> Gnome. But i just brought the computer into an office, plugged in an
> E
I know this must be an incredibly dumb question, but i cant find my eth0
interface.
I normally use a WiFi connection on my laptop, running Etch with Gnome. But i
just brought the computer into an office, plugged in an Ethernet cable, and
waited for NetworkManager to pick it up. And waited. And
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 12:45:51PM +, Tyler Smith wrote:
> On 2007-03-17, Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2007-03-17, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Within that directory I issued:
> >>
> >>$ls -1 | xargs -L 1 tar -xf
> >>
> >> and ended up with a tes
On 2007-03-17, Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-03-17, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Within that directory I issued:
>>
>> $ls -1 | xargs -L 1 tar -xf
>>
>> and ended up with a test subdirectory containing all nine files.
>>
>
> The argument to ls,
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 03:36 -0500, Adam Porter wrote:
> So it looks like the ultimate solution is Greg Folkert's suggestion to
> install the package "unp", which handles multiple archives and
> automatically chooses the right extractor. Cameron Hutchison's shell
> function is also handy, but unp
On 2007-03-17 18:49:59 +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
> unp, orange. Right. Never heard of either of them. I have now.
unp doesn't do proper character escaping, though. So, never do things
like "unp *.tar.bz2" on files that come from an external source, as
I fear that this may execute arbitrary code on
So it looks like the ultimate solution is Greg Folkert's suggestion to
install the package "unp", which handles multiple archives and
automatically chooses the right extractor. Cameron Hutchison's shell
function is also handy, but unp probably makes that unnecessary if you can
install packages on
ED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/A-silly-question-about-tar-tf3418581.html#a9537723
Sent from the Debian User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2007-03-17, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Within that directory I issued:
>
> $ls -1 | xargs -L 1 tar -xf
>
> and ended up with a test subdirectory containing all nine files.
>
Ok, I tried that out. The key seems to be the arguments to xarg,
either "-L 1" as you sugge
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:23:02PM +, Tyler Smith wrote:
> On 2007-03-17, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> I have, and unfortunately it doesn't work. The result is the same as
> the original problem with the regular * expansion:
>
> tyler:tar-> find ./ -name '*.tar.gz' |
On 2007-03-17, Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I have, and unfortunately it doesn't work. The result is the same as
>> the original problem with the regular * expansion:
>>
>> tyler:tar-> find ./ -name '*.tar.gz' | xargs echo
>> ../one.tar.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 14:34 +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
[snip] (script can be found in the previous message)
>> Another handy little script. I just love this list. It's a lot easier
>> to type x *.zip or x *.rar than it is to right
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:59:01AM EST, Adam Porter wrote:
> I've read the man page, googled this list and the rest of the Net, but I
> still can't figure out why this doesn't work:
>
> $ tar xjf *.tar.bz2
> tar: beryl-core-0.2.0.tar.bz2: Not found in archive
> tar: beryl-manager-0.2.0.tar.bz2: No
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 14:34 +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
> Cameron Hutchison wrote:
> [snip]
>
> >
> > I have the following shell function defined in my .bashrc which I use to
> > extract the various archives I come across. It handles multiple archives
> > on the command line. Usage is simple:
> >
> >
Tyler Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-03-17, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You use find to spit out a list of the files you want (you _may_ be
> > able to just use ls -1 .tar), pipe that through xargs. Something
> > like this:
> >
> > ls -1 .tar.gz | xargs
Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 02:35:01PM +0100, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 March 2007 13:58, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 05:00:21AM -0500, Adam Porter wrote:
> >
> > > You use find to spit out a list of the file
On Saturday 17 March 2007 14:45, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 02:35:01PM +0100, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 March 2007 13:58, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 05:00:21AM -0500, Adam Porter wrote:
> > >
> > > You use find to spit out a lis
On 2007-03-17, Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You use find to spit out a list of the files you want (you _may_ be able
> to just use ls -1 .tar), pipe that through xargs. Something like this:
>
> ls -1 .tar.gz | xargs tar [tar options -f ]
>
> for each line of input it re
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 02:35:01PM +0100, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> On Saturday 17 March 2007 13:58, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 05:00:21AM -0500, Adam Porter wrote:
>
> > You use find to spit out a list of the files you want (you _may_ be able
> > to just use ls -1 .tar),
On Saturday 17 March 2007 13:58, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 05:00:21AM -0500, Adam Porter wrote:
> > Thanks for your replies, everyone. It seems to me that there might be a
> > market for a simple script frontend to tar that would handle
> > shell-expanded wildcards; perh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cameron Hutchison wrote:
[snip]
>
> I have the following shell function defined in my .bashrc which I use to
> extract the various archives I come across. It handles multiple archives
> on the command line. Usage is simple:
>
> $ x *.tar.gz
>
> x (
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 05:00:21AM -0500, Adam Porter wrote:
> Thanks for your replies, everyone. It seems to me that there might be a
> market for a simple script frontend to tar that would handle shell-expanded
> wildcards; perhaps it could be included in Debian's package of tar. Would
> that b
Adam Porter wrote:
>Thanks for your replies, everyone. It seems to me that there might be a
>market for a simple script frontend to tar that would handle shell-expanded
>wildcards; perhaps it could be included in Debian's package of tar. Would
>that be a good idea? Does anything like that alrea
Thanks for your replies, everyone. It seems to me that there might be a
market for a simple script frontend to tar that would handle shell-expanded
wildcards; perhaps it could be included in Debian's package of tar. Would
that be a good idea? Does anything like that already exist?
--
To UNSUB
I've read the man page, googled this list and the rest of the Net, but I
still can't figure out why this doesn't work:
$ tar xjf *.tar.bz2
tar: beryl-core-0.2.0.tar.bz2: Not found in archive
tar: beryl-manager-0.2.0.tar.bz2: Not found in archive
tar: beryl-plugins-0.2.0.tar.bz2: Not found in archi
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:24:17 +0100
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> The wildcard (glob pattern) will be expanded to all the *.tar.bz2
> filenames in one line, separated by spaces. This is fed as the argument
> to tar. It looks like the "extract" action interprets the first filen
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:59:01 -0500, Adam Porter wrote:
> I've read the man page, googled this list and the rest of the Net, but I
> still can't figure out why this doesn't work:
>
> $ tar xjf *.tar.bz2
> tar: beryl-core-0.2.0.tar.bz2: Not found in archive
> tar: beryl-manager-0.2.0.tar.bz2: No
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:59:01AM -0500, Adam Porter wrote:
> I've read the man page, googled this list and the rest of the Net, but I
> still can't figure out why this doesn't work:
>
> $ tar xjf *.tar.bz2
> tar: beryl-core-0.2.0.tar.bz2: Not found in archive
> tar: beryl-manager-0.2.0.tar.bz2:
I've read the man page, googled this list and the rest of the Net, but I
still can't figure out why this doesn't work:
$ tar xjf *.tar.bz2
tar: beryl-core-0.2.0.tar.bz2: Not found in archive
tar: beryl-manager-0.2.0.tar.bz2: Not found in archive
tar: beryl-plugins-0.2.0.tar.bz2: Not found in archi
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 09:13, Crispin Wellington wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 22:05, shyamk wrote:
> >
> > How do you start an FTP server program ?
> > This might be a silly question , but it is
> > something for which I have no answer.
> >
> > In o
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 22:05, shyamk wrote:
>
> How do you start an FTP server program ?
> This might be a silly question , but it is
> something for which I have no answer.
>
> In our server , we faced a two-fold problem :
>
> o One that we could not log-in as any us
How do you start an FTP server program ?
This might be a silly question , but it is
something for which I have no answer.
In our server , we faced a two-fold problem :
o One that we could not log-in as any user.This I solved
by entering single-user mode (on rebooting after we knew
I get a segfault when starting Enlightenment/Gnome (from pototato) about
20% of the time (logging in from xdm). I have an AMD chip.. not sure
which one though.
I just started using Enlightenment (had been using WindowMaker) and I must
say I'm *very* impressed and other than the occasional segfau
sounds to me like some library changed or configuration changed then when
you rebooted the changes 'took effect' (cough) and that screwed E. i've
had similar problems since i compile stuff like KDE/GNOME from sources, if
it gets outta sync somehow i may not have problems untnil the next time i
reb
Hi,
just a stupid thing:
I just introduced a K6-3 400, not overclocked, into my system, and after
that, i only get segfaoult if i want to start enlightenment/gnome. Has
anyone experiences with this? Normaly it should work...
Thanks,
ingo
Hi!
Is debian prepared for having these special kind of permissions
for /dev/log?
-- p.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 13:58:56 +0100 (GMT)
From: Chris Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mike Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
On 28-Apr-99 Jonathan P Tomer wrote:
> (please cc: me to replies)
>
> is it currently possible to do a straight potato initial install, or must
> one first install slink's base system and then aptify?
>
Until we are close to freezing, I would say do a slink install and update from
that.
(please cc: me to replies)
is it currently possible to do a straight potato initial install, or must
one first install slink's base system and then aptify?
--phouchg
"For a price I'd do about anything, except pull the trigger: for that I'd
need a pretty good cause" -- Queensryche, "Revolution Cal
Hi Daniel,
you wrote on: 01 Feb 99 at 04:13 (received 01.02.99)
about : _Silly question_
>I'm sorry if this is a really silly question, but I was wondering where
>one goes to get apt-get and the necessary utilities to upgrade a hamm
>system to slink via ftp?
It was
> I'm sorry if this is a really silly question, but I was wondering where
> one goes to get apt-get and the necessary utilities to upgrade a hamm
> system to slink via ftp?
Well, the way I did it, a long time ago, was to grab the apt package from
http://www.debian.org/~jgg and in
I'm sorry if this is a really silly question, but I was wondering where
one goes to get apt-get and the necessary utilities to upgrade a hamm
system to slink via ftp?
Thanks for the help
-Dan
Hi,
>>"M" == M C Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
M> Hmm. I prefer Schildt's C the complete reference.
Gack! The annotations are kown to be incorrect; the man even
fails to describe the standard he has in front of him. On the
comp.lang.c newsgroup, people have stated they can open th
On Thu, 13 Aug 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Liran Zvibel wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Where is the documentation for C ? i.e. language help?
> > >
> > > I have a hard time remembering syntax and stuff.. :)
> > >
> > >
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
> |
> | Well, the 'strcpy' man page is in the manpages-dev package, that sounds
> | like it might be what you want. The gcc docs ought to come with the gcc
> | package.
> |
>
> Don't forget the libc6-doc Debian package. It contains the info f
*- Havoc Pennington wrote about "Re: Silly Question... VERY simple :)"
|
| On Thu, 13 Aug 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
| >
| > Perfect, but I have not got the appropriate package installed, and I cant
| > seem to find it.. call me stupid, blind whatever... where can the C
On Thu, 13 Aug 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
>
> Perfect, but I have not got the appropriate package installed, and I cant
> seem to find it.. call me stupid, blind whatever... where can the C
> manpages / info pages be found. When I used DO$ to program, DJGPP had info
> pages on all sorts of thin
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Liran Zvibel wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
>
> >
> > Where is the documentation for C ? i.e. language help?
> >
> > I have a hard time remembering syntax and stuff.. :)
> >
> >Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> If you know
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, M.C. Vernon wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
> > >
> > > Where is the documentation for C ? i.e. language help?
> > > I have a hard time remembering syntax and stuff.. :)
> >
> > You're best off just buying
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, M.C. Vernon wrote:
>
> Hmm. I prefer Schildt's C the complete reference.
>
Haven't tried it myself, but on comp.lang.c.moderated they are always
calling him "Shit" and generally degrading the guy. So I was discouraged
from doing so. ;-)
K&R is a very concise if occasionally
"M.C. Vernon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Havoc Pennington wrote:
|
| >
| > On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
| > >
| > > Where is the documentation for C ? i.e. language help?
| > >
| > > I have a hard time remembering syntax and stuff.. :)
| > >
| >
| > You'
On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
> > Where is the documentation for C ? i.e. language help?
> > I have a hard time remembering syntax and stuff.. :)
>
> You're best off just buying "The C Programming Language" (ANSI edition).
> It isn't v
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
>
> Where is the documentation for C ? i.e. language help?
>
> I have a hard time remembering syntax and stuff.. :)
>
>Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
If you know the name of the function just type
man function
If you don'
On Tue, 11 Aug 1998, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
> >
> > Where is the documentation for C ? i.e. language help?
> >
> > I have a hard time remembering syntax and stuff.. :)
> >
>
> You're best off just buying "The C Programming Language" (ANSI editi
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
>
> Where is the documentation for C ? i.e. language help?
>
> I have a hard time remembering syntax and stuff.. :)
>
You're best off just buying "The C Programming Language" (ANSI edition).
It isn't very expensive and the hardcopy is handy. There m
Where is the documentation for C ? i.e. language help?
I have a hard time remembering syntax and stuff.. :)
Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
PGP Key available, reply with "pgpkey" as subject.
-
96 matches
Mail list logo
