On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:52:04 +1100
Alex Samad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my mail reader sort my mail in date order and links together all
the threaded emails. I read them in date/time order, if I follow
a thread from begging to end, then all i should have to do is read
the top posts
On 15/01/2008, Alex Samad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my mail reader sort my mail in date order and links together all the threaded
emails. I read them in date/time order, if I follow a thread from begging to
end, then all i should have to do is read the top posts, but if they bottom
posted
for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create weekly digests correctly) or is it a question of etiquette?
The latter.
Rationality, because while some cultures read left-right, and
others read right
, then all i should have to do is read
the top posts, but if they bottom posted, then as the thread grows
I find I have to scroll further down, re reading the same
information I have read in the previous email.
Then the people posting are not trimming their posts as they should.
Amen!
WT
should have to do is read the top posts, but if they bottom
posted, then as the thread grows I find I have to scroll further down, re
reading the same information I have read in the previous email.
Too bad the whole world doesn't use your mail reader. The whole world
should be forced
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:00:28PM +1100, Alex Samad wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 03:49:52PM -0900, Ken Irving wrote:
In fact, it's a social convention, a matter of etiquette. The practice
varies, and some lists work the other way, but on this and many lists
the convention is to top post
, then all i should have to do is read
the top posts, but if they bottom posted, then as the thread grows
I find I have to scroll further down, re reading the same
information I have read in the previous email.
Then the people posting are not trimming their posts as they should.
or taken
/14/08 10:21, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich wrote:
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create weekly digests correctly) or is it a question of etiquette?
The latter.
Rationality
them for many months or years in
TFA.
Also, your mail was _middle_posted_ and quoted every message before it
in full. You really are aiming for the worse of all worlds, aren't
you?
I believe (maybe wrongly ) that this mailing list is a non top-posting list, I
try and conform
to
end, then all i should have to do is read the top posts, but if they bottom
posted, then as the thread grows I find I have to scroll further down, re
reading the same information I have read in the previous email.
Too bad the whole world doesn't use your mail reader. The whole world
should
wrote:
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create weekly digests correctly) or is it a question of etiquette?
Rationality, because while some cultures read left-right, and
others read right-left
someone *will* argue with
equal validity (to them at least) that their way is better.
In fact, it's a social convention, a matter of etiquette. The practice
varies, and some lists work the other way, but on this and many lists
the convention is to top post, trim heartily, try to get
the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
--
The first 90% of a project takes 90% of the time, the last 10% takes the
other 90% of the time.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
way, but on this and many lists
the convention is to top post, trim heartily, try to get the attributions
Arghh... that should've been bottom post, or at least to not top post...
It the convention is to top post then we don't seem to be following the
convention. ( I
emails. I read them in date/time order, if I follow
a thread from begging to end, then all i should have to do is read
the top posts, but if they bottom posted, then as the thread grows
I find I have to scroll further down, re reading the same
information I have read in the previous email
. The exception is of
course when you start a thread in the middle.
And another is when you land on the same post in the archives, or
groups.google.com and you have to try to make sense of a mish-mash of
reply styles.
I believe (maybe wrongly ) that this mailing list is a non
top-posting list, I try
Alex Samad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
my mail reader sort my mail in date order and links together all
the threaded emails. I read them in date/time order, if I follow a
thread from begging to end, then all i should have to do is read
the top posts, but if they bottom posted, then as the thread
lists
the convention is to top post, trim heartily, try to get the attributions
Arghh... that should've been bottom post, or at least to not top post...
It the convention is to top post then we don't seem to be following the
convention. ( I thought it was to not top
Alex Samad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 03:49:52PM -0900, Ken Irving wrote:
varies, and some lists work the other way, but on this and many lists
the convention is to top post, trim heartily, try to get the attributions
If I read him correctly, he meant to say
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:44:57AM +0900, Peter F Bradshaw wrote:
Ok. Fine. Until you guys grow up this list is going to /dev/null.
If people don't stop complaining and leaving this list, then I'm going
to complain and leave!
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Ok. Fine. Until you guys grow up this list is going to /dev/null.
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich wrote:
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create weekly digests correctly
Peter F Bradshaw wrote:
Ok. Fine. Until you guys grow up this list is going to /dev/null.
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich wrote:
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create
On Jan 14, 2008 1:57 PM, Alex Samad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:32:53AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 01/14/08 10:21, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich wrote:
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g
On Jan 14, 2008 8:21 AM, Ebanutiy Ebanatik Ebanatovich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for offtopic but I'm wondering if the cause of avoiding of top
posting is in something technical (e.g. to help forum software to
create weekly digests correctly)
Yes, but not for that reason. People might
On Jan 14, 2008 1:03 PM, Dotan Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should read this:
http://what-is-what.com/what_is/top_posting.html
I prefer http://learn.to/quote for that; the URL you mention only
suggests what is wrong, but leaves what is right wide open to
interpretation.
--
Paul Johnson
On Jan 14, 2008 6:43 PM, s. keeling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe (maybe wrongly ) that this mailing list is a non
top-posting list, I try and conform.
You're correct. List policy prefers snip irrelevancies and bottom
post.
Where are you quoting from? If that's on l.d.o, perhaps
snip
Only if the lines are also reversed, kind of like how STOP AHEAD is
painted on pavement with the word STOP first, then AHEAD after so you
pass over the first word in the statement before the second.
Well put! :-)
--
Cheers,
Julian De Marchi
--
OpenNIC user -
was _middle_posted_ and quoted every message before it
in full. You really are aiming for the worse of all worlds, aren't
you?
I believe (maybe wrongly ) that this mailing list is a non top-posting list, I
try and conform.
You believe correctly, though conversational quoting is something that
really
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:34:28PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:06:33PM +1000, Julian De Marchi wrote:
snip
Only if the lines are also reversed, kind of like how STOP AHEAD is
painted on pavement with the word STOP first, then AHEAD after so you
pass
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:06:33PM +1000, Julian De Marchi wrote:
snip
Only if the lines are also reversed, kind of like how STOP AHEAD is
painted on pavement with the word STOP first, then AHEAD after so you
pass over the first word in the statement before the second.
Well put! :-)
posting, there is no guarantee that you will get the
whole gist of it either.
It not that I am against middle posting or bottom posting nor am i against top
posting, each in the right situation has merit
In the interest of getting back to debian-user, I will make this my last post
On Jan 14, 2008 8:34 PM, Andrew Sackville-West
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 02:06:33PM +1000, Julian De Marchi wrote:
snip
Only if the lines are also reversed, kind of like how STOP AHEAD is
painted on pavement with the word STOP first, then AHEAD after so you
pass
to find a one-liner at the bottom of the message.
Actually, that's a drawback, not a benefit. Because people who top-post
don't have to roll through the previous text to add their comments, they
forget to trim out the irrelevant parts. This results in huge messages
with lots of deeply indented text
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/28/07 14:42, Pantor wrote:
Why you are not haapy about posting in top? It is only another marked
checkbox in mail program preferences. If it is not very well, please
explain and I will change it.
A: Because it messes up the order in which
the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
, but the preference (on this mailing list, at least, and it makes
sense to me) to top-posting is not bottom-posting, but rather inline
posting, with lots of snippage.
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
read only to find a one-liner at the bottom of the
message.
That's why it's bad manners to not [snip] the irrelevant portions of
the email you are replying to.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally
read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What
at the bottom of the message.
Actually, that's a drawback, not a benefit. Because people who top-
post don't have to roll through the previous text to add their
comments, they forget to trim out the irrelevant parts. This results
in huge messages with lots of deeply indented text. This is highly
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 22:29, Robert Hodgins wrote:
No, as a good practice, you should remove everything that is not relevant to
the answer you give.
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El mié, 28-11-2007 a las 23:56 +0100, Thierry Chatelet escribió:
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 22:29, Robert Hodgins wrote:
No, as a good practice, you should remove everything that is not relevant to
the answer you give.
Which is not the same as 'remove everything'. ;-)
--
Gabriel
Which is not the same as 'remove everything'. ;-)
--
Yes, I was a bit too fast
Thierry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Victor H De la Luz wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007 4:25 AM, xab lab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/11/14, Víctor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
¿fuentes?
http://www.top500.org/stats/list/30/osfam
Se me hace extraño, en la pagina de supercomputo de la UNAM dice:
El sistema HP Cluster Platform 4000, KanBalam
2007/11/14, Víctor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
¿fuentes?
http://www.top500.org/stats/list/30/osfam
¿fuentes?
On Nov 14, 2007 3:40 AM, Cristian Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
para que no quede duda
Operating system Family Count Share % Rmax Sum (GF) Rpeak Sum (GF)
Processor Sum
Linux 426 85.20 % 4896692 7956758 970790
Windows 6 1.20 % 47495 86797 12112
Unix
On Nov 14, 2007 4:25 AM, xab lab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/11/14, Víctor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
¿fuentes?
http://www.top500.org/stats/list/30/osfam
Se me hace extraño, en la pagina de supercomputo de la UNAM dice:
El sistema HP Cluster Platform 4000, KanBalam es la supercomputadora
para que no quede duda
Operating system Family Count Share % Rmax Sum (GF) Rpeak Sum (GF)
Processor Sum
Linux 426 85.20 % 4896692 7956758 970790
Windows 6 1.20 % 47495 86797 12112
Unix30 6.00 % 408378 519178 73532
BSD Based 2 0.40 % 44783 50176
El Mon, 1 Oct 2007 15:57:15 +0200
Manolo Díaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Se me olvido mencionarlo en el correo anterior. No respondas encima. Para ver
la razón lee el último correo que te he enviado y trata de seguir la trama.
Verás que inicialmente tendrás que ir a la zona inferior, después a
Galera, preciso construir gráficos dos históricos de uso de cpu de uma
máquina e já estava para instalar o MRTG qdo notei diferenças entre a
medição do mrtg X top
Vejam a medição do cpustats do mrtg na mesma hora do top:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ watch ./cpustats
Every 2.0s: ./cpustats
Cuidado - Este tipo es un estafador, mirar en:
http://el4x4.forums.ylos.com/viewtopic.php?t=7870
Jacinto
www.yclasicos.com
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Agradeceremos-su-enlace-a-www.APARTAMENTOSMARINA.com%2C-BE-IN-THE-TOP-10-with-new-LINKS--By%3A
Atención:
Este tipo es un estafador, mirar para más info en:
http://el4x4.forums.ylos.com/viewtopic.php?t=7870
Jacinto
http://www.yclasicos.com
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Agradeceremos-su-enlace-a-www.BCN-APARTMENT.com%2C-BE-IN-THE-TOP-10-with-new-LINKS
Hi,
I'm running a process that is very memory intensive (analyzing
ca. 500,000 phylogenetic trees). It's using 1.6Gb of virtual memory,
1.2Gb of physical memory (I have 1.5Gb of RAM). However, htop reports
only 21.5 for MEM%, while top reports 83.8 for %MEM. I thought that
htop was just
%, while top reports 83.8 for %MEM. I thought that
htop was just a prettier top, but I can't find an explanation in the
man pages for the difference in the reported MEM%. VIRT and RES are
the same for both. Where does the difference come from?
Not a burning issue, just curious...
Tyler
of physical memory (I have 1.5Gb of RAM). However, htop reports
only 21.5 for MEM%, while top reports 83.8 for %MEM. I thought that
htop was just a prettier top, but I can't find an explanation in the
man pages for the difference in the reported MEM%. VIRT and RES are
the same for both. Where
El vie, 04-05-2007 a las 17:10 -0500, José Alfredo Andaluz Prado
escribió:
usa htop
1) ¿que ventaja tiene htop para controlar mysql, frente a mytop o
mysqladmin extended-status? ¿que usa los atajos del mc, que son los más
parecidos al edit de msdos?
2) Por favor, no hagas top-posting
3) Por
Hola,
según la siguiente salida de top... que me diría de mi sistema ??
top - 18:17:29 up 64 days, 7:00, 4 users, load average: 1.77, 2.00, 2.05
Tasks: 97 total, 1 running, 96 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 7.8% us, 3.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 86.4% id, 2.2% wa, 0.1% hi, 0.5% si
El 4/05/07, Listas Locatel [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hola,
según la siguiente salida de top... que me diría de mi sistema ??
top - 18:17:29 up 64 days, 7:00, 4 users, load average: 1.77, 2.00, 2.05
Tasks: 97 total, 1 running, 96 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 7.8% us, 3.0
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 02:24:28PM -0400, Rhonny Lanz wrote:
El 4/05/07, Listas Locatel [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hola,
según la siguiente salida de top... que me diría de mi sistema ??
top - 18:17:29 up 64 days, 7:00, 4 users, load average: 1.77, 2.00, 2.05
Tasks: 97 total, 1
Quizas la herramienta mytop te ayude un poco
o el clasico mysqladmin extended-status
- Original Message -
From: Blu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: Entender top linux
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 02:24:28PM -0400
usa htop
On 5/4/07, Listas Locatel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hola,
según la siguiente salida de top... que me diría de mi sistema ??
top - 18:17:29 up 64 days, 7:00, 4 users, load average: 1.77, 2.00,
2.05
Tasks: 97 total, 1 running, 96 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 7.8
Completamente de acuerdo con Coin.
No hay más que ver cómo la diva de Basaburu salió en seguida a presumir.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
El Friday 20 April 2007 00:33:00 coin escribió:
Mira tio o tia no se lo que eres.
El hecho de que seas inculto e iletrado no es mi problema. Si no sabes
diferenciar entre un insulto y una calificación, es tu problema.
Creo que este enlace te va ha ser de mucha utilidad:
El Friday 20 April 2007 12:19:58 Marcelo Armengot escribió:
Completamente de acuerdo con Coin.
No hay más que ver cómo la diva de Basaburu salió en seguida a presumir.
Es lamentable ver como nos acercamos mas a lo que Orwell el doble-habla el
doble-pensar.
Si estas aquí lo primero que
Se volvio a conseguir. Un hilo largo de correos de insultos y de
estupideces, gracias al top posting
En eso la lista debian se ha vuelto increiblemente buena.
Yo aun sigo esperando una respuesta a al problema con mysql en esta lista.
Yo creo que no hay que decir mas nada.
--
Saludos:
Juan
¡Huy lo que has dich! Cuidado con el humor (y con otras cosas). Aquí no se
usa eso. Esto sólo es un apoyo técnico voluntario a los usuarios de Debian,
así, tal cual, frío y sesudo. No cabe mas. Y si osas poner también algo de
fantasía debianita, te mandarán a alguna [EMAIL PROTECTED] o a la
On 4/20/07, Horacio Castellini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
¡Huy lo que has dich! Cuidado con el humor (y con otras cosas). Aquí no se
usa eso. Esto sólo es un apoyo técnico voluntario a los usuarios de Debian,
así, tal cual, frío y sesudo. No cabe mas. Y si osas poner también algo de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
El 20/04/07 18:25, Juan Guil escribió:
(...)
Yo aun sigo esperando una respuesta a al problema con mysql en esta lista.
Instálate mysq-server, y santas pascuas. Primero borra en /var/log/mysql/
*todos* los ficheros que tengas en él, y haz:
El Viernes 20 Abril 2007 09:25, Juan Guil escribió:
Se volvio a conseguir. Un hilo largo de correos de insultos y de
estupideces, gracias al top posting
Hola
Yo creo que esta situacion, no se debe al top posting, ni a otras cosas
similares.
Pienso, que el problema es que para algunas
El Viernes 20 Abril 2007 11:24, Horacio Castellini escribió:
¡Huy lo que has dich! Cuidado con el humor (y con otras cosas). Aquí
no se usa eso. Esto sólo es un apoyo técnico voluntario a los usuarios de
Debian, así, tal cual, frío y sesudo. No cabe mas. Y si osas poner
también algo de
El Viernes 20 Abril 2007 11:31, Rubén C. Díaz Alonso 'outime' escribió:
On 4/20/07, Horacio Castellini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
¡Huy lo que has dich! Cuidado con el humor (y con otras cosas).
Aquí no se usa eso. Esto sólo es un apoyo técnico voluntario a los
usuarios de Debian, así,
El viernes, 20 abril del 2007 a las 06:25:59, Juan Guil escribió:
Se volvio a conseguir. Un hilo largo de correos de insultos y de
estupideces, gracias al top posting
El problema de muchos listeros es que tienen demasiado tiempo libre, o
mejor dicho que se aburren como ostras o que no tienen
Hola
Supongo, que quieres decir que se rien de ti, yo vivo en un pais de origen
Anglo-sajon y nadie se rie de nadie, excepto en Kindergarten. Lo aclaro para
evitar mas malos entendidos.
Uy... un trol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
El 20/04/07, Horacio Castellini [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hola
Supongo, que quieres decir que se rien de ti, yo vivo en un pais de origen
Anglo-sajon y nadie se rie de nadie, excepto en Kindergarten. Lo aclaro para
evitar mas malos entendidos.
Uy... un trol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
El Viernes, 20 de Abril de 2007 20:24, Horacio Castellini escribió:
¡Huy lo que has dich! Cuidado con el humor (y con otras cosas). Aquí
no se usa eso. Esto sólo es un apoyo técnico voluntario a los usuarios de
Debian, así, tal cual, frío y sesudo. No cabe mas. Y si osas poner
también
El Viernes 20 Abril 2007 14:21, Horacio Castellini escribió:
Hola
Supongo, que quieres decir que se rien de ti, yo vivo en un pais de
origen Anglo-sajon y nadie se rie de nadie, excepto en Kindergarten. Lo
aclaro para evitar mas malos entendidos.
Uy... un trol
No, segun yo, cuando
Gracias Jorge!
Ok lo del HTML.
¿Qué es el Top Posting? Me imagino que es iniciar una nueva cadena cada vez.
¿Cómo puedo evitarlo?
¿Cómo puedo seguir una cadena de correos?
¿A quien le debo responder?
¿Directamente a Debian User Spanish... o a quien me responde... en este
caso a Ud. Jorge
yo tambien quiero saber lo que pregunta el compañero, seria weno que
alguine nos diera una mano
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
El 19/04/07 21:30, jesus erdeny andrade fandiño escribió:
yo tambien quiero saber lo que pregunta el compañero, seria weno que
alguine nos diera una mano
Pues toca leer las normas de la lista, y demás de lo que han dicho en este
hilo, como de los
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Javier Flores Aldape escribió:
Gracias Jorge!
Ok lo del HTML.
¿Qué es el Top Posting? Me imagino que es iniciar una nueva cadena cada vez.
¿Cómo puedo evitarlo?
Es responder sobre el mensaje. Lo evitas respondiendo debajo del mensaje
al que
| Ricardo Delgado |
| |
| M$-Window$? ReBoot |
| GNU/Linux Be Root |
---0ooo-
ooo0( )
( ) ) /
\ ((_/
\_)
Por Favor, no hagas Top Posting
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top
El día 19/04/07, jesus erdeny andrade fandiño [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
yo tambien quiero saber lo que pregunta el compañero, seria weno que
alguine nos diera una mano
Aqui puedes encontrar información concreta frente al tema.
Saludos.
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting
El 19/04/07, Javier Flores Aldape [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Gracias Jorge!
Ok lo del HTML.
¿Qué es el Top Posting? Me imagino que es iniciar una nueva cadena cada
vez.
El Top Posting es el método ideal para sacar a un guru de sus
casillas. Vieras que espectaculares berrinches hacen estas
El jue, 19-04-2007 a las 15:28 -0500, coin escribió:
El 19/04/07, Javier Flores Aldape [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Gracias Jorge!
Ok lo del HTML.
¿Qué es el Top Posting? Me imagino que es iniciar una nueva cadena cada
vez.
El Top Posting es el método ideal para sacar a un guru de
El Thursday 19 April 2007 22:28:02 coin escribió:
hola:
¿Qué es el Top Posting? Me imagino que es iniciar una nueva cadena cada
vez.
El top-posting es un metodo para dificultar la comunicación e inducir al
lector a hacer un esfuerzo suplementario innecesario.
Yo creo que es mucho mejor que
El Top Posting es el método ideal para sacar a un guru de sus
casillas. Vieras que espectaculares berrinches hacen estas divas.
También es un método para fastidiar a los novatos y desalentarlos a
que sigan preguntando cosas obvias y hacerles ver lo miserables que
son por no estar a su altura
tranquilices y luego contestas.
Por que al final alcaro perfectamente que no promuevo el Top Posting.
Esto es sin mas una deformación de la realidad. Si fuera como tu dices la
gente que tiene más conocimientos no estaría aquí. Y esa gente no tiene nada
que demostrarte a ti. Por lo tanto decir esto es una
A Dijous 19 Abril 2007 23:15, Javier Flores Aldape va escriure:
Por eso Debian es grandioso, por su comunidad, por su gente.
Recordando:
http://wiki.debian.org/NormasLista
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-posting
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette
Gracias por tu interés en el buen
El Jueves, 19 de Abril de 2007 23:15, Javier Flores Aldape escribió:
Voy comprendiendo la idea, gracias especialmente a José Luis por su
explicación, a Ricardo y a Samurai por las ligas, y a Coin por su humor.
¡Huy lo que has dich! Cuidado con el humor (y con otras cosas). Aquí no se
usa
Gracias por tu interés en el buen funcionamiento de la lista ahora solo te
falta una cosa más, no enviar los correos en HTML. Gmail los envía así por
defecto y sería conveniente que lo enviaras en texto plano. Mira en los
históricos para sacar eso de gmail. Me parece que te sale arriba, al
I'm sure this was mentioned on this list within the last month ..
Someone recommended using a newer .. possibly better program that does
pretty much what the old top process monitoring tool does.
Would anyone remember this and what the program's name is?
Been looking for it all over and can't
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:38:16PM -0400, cga2000 wrote:
I'm sure this was mentioned on this list within the last month ..
Someone recommended using a newer .. possibly better program that does
pretty much what the old top process monitoring tool does.
Would anyone remember this and what
top process monitoring tool does.
Would anyone remember this and what the program's name is?
Been looking for it all over and can't find it.
htop
A
Spot on ..
Thanks,
cga
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi,
I recently installed Debian Etch and it works fine...including the network
connection. But in the top-bar, on the right I have 4 icons, from right to
left: Window Selector, speaker, time and NetworkManager that says No network
connection. When I right click on it, I get a drop-down menu
Huub van Niekerk wrote:
Hi,
I recently installed Debian Etch and it works fine...including the
network connection. But in the top-bar, on the right I have 4 icons,
from right to left: Window Selector, speaker, time and NetworkManager
that says No network connection. When I right click
NetworkManager is only supposed to configure interfaces *not*
configured
statically in /etc/network/interfaces. If the interface you use for
Network connection is defined there.
NetworkManager will not touch it. As it is left with no interfaces to
configure, it says No
El dom, 25-03-2007 a las 00:15 +0100, lele lala escribió:
El día 24/03/07, Juan Carlos Fuentes M. escribió:
sera...
1. dejar de prestale atencion
2. Cambiar las reglas
¿cambiar la regla de tu culo? vaya... alguno confesó
en público:
http://juanca.wiki.mailxmail.com/PaginaInicial
El Sábado 24 Marzo 2007 20:15, lele lala escribió:
El día 24/03/07, Juan Carlos Fuentes M. escribió:
sera...
1. dejar de prestale atencion
2. Cambiar las reglas
¿cambiar la regla de tu culo? vaya... alguno confesó
en público:
http://juanca.wiki.mailxmail.com/PaginaInicial
documentación y buscar mucho antes de preguntar (1).
(x)_No enviar correos en HTML a la lista, usar texto plano o sin
formato (más info).
(x)_No hacer Top-Posting, responder siempre debajo del correo original.
(x)_No hacer Fwd, siempre Reply, o lo que es lo mismo: no Reenviar a
la lista, siempre Responder
correo que
incumplan las normas 3 veces seguidas?
En fin usuarios de gmail, tener un poco de consideración, yo uso gmail
en otras listas de correo y puedo perfectamente escribir en texto plano,
sin hacer top-posting y recortando los caracteres.
Un saludo
estoy de acuerdo con las reglas.
pero tengo
el archivo de debian)
6) ¿Des-subscripción y lista negra, para las cuentas de correo que
incumplan las normas 3 veces seguidas?
En fin usuarios de gmail, tener un poco de consideración, yo uso gmail
en otras listas de correo y puedo perfectamente escribir en texto plano,
sin hacer top-posting y
Le samedi 24 mars 2007 20:06, Juan Carlos Fuentes M. escribió:
divstrongnbsp;2. Cambiar las reglas/strongbr clear=allbr--
¿Y qué habría que cambiar en las reglas?
--
Claude Micouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://astuce.linux.free.fr
Por favor, no adjunte documentos en formatos doc o ppt, sino en
601 - 700 of 1631 matches
Mail list logo
