On Ma, 22 feb 11, 09:18:12, Petrus Validus wrote:
> > > I interpret the "if used correctly" bit to mean "using the GMail web
> > > interface, not a 3rd party client such as Evolution or Mutt." Am I
> > > correct in this interpretation?
> >
> > No, I mean, AFAICT, IMAP was not designed for this
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Petrus Validus wrote:
I interpret the "if used correctly" bit to mean "using the GMail web
interface, not a 3rd party client such as Evolution or Mutt." Am I
correct in this interpretation?
No, I mean, AFAICT, IMAP was not designed for this paradigm (same
message present
> > I interpret the "if used correctly" bit to mean "using the GMail web
> > interface, not a 3rd party client such as Evolution or Mutt." Am I
> > correct in this interpretation?
>
> No, I mean, AFAICT, IMAP was not designed for this paradigm (same
> message present in different folders/tags/
On Lu, 21 feb 11, 20:26:45, Petrus Validus wrote:
> > > Is there a way for this to be disabled and subsequently have
> > > messages be displayed in their specific folders...or is this just how
> > > Gmail works?
> >
> > This one of the better "innovation" brought by Gmail, if used correctly.
>
On Lu, 21 feb 11, 22:39:46, Peter Tynan wrote:
> On 21 February 2011 21:24, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> > Maybe this is mutt specific, but if I just delete the mail from Inbox in
> > All Mail the message is still marked as unread (a.k.a new). If I mark it
> > as read and sync, then it's also marked
> Hmm, as far as I understand, a message is always present in [Gmail]/All
> Mail', unless moved to [Gmail]/Trash or [Gmail]/Spam. New mail (not
> filtered) goes to my Inbox. If I want to get rid of it for good I move
> it to [Gmail]/Trash, but if I want to "archive" it I just delete the
> Inbox
> > Is there a way for this to be disabled and subsequently have
> > messages be displayed in their specific folders...or is this just how
> > Gmail works?
>
> This one of the better "innovation" brought by Gmail, if used correctly.
I interpret the "if used correctly" bit to mean "using the GM
On 21 February 2011 21:24, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Maybe this is mutt specific, but if I just delete the mail from Inbox in
> All Mail the message is still marked as unread (a.k.a new). If I mark it
> as read and sync, then it's also marked as read in All Mail. I assume
> Gmail takes the delete f
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Andrei Popescu wrote:
If you send via Gmail's SMTP you always have a copy in Gmail's sent, so
it should be enough to tell alpine not to save its own copy.
Check the headers - I use a local sendmail. I've been doing some digging
and it is in a sub-folder named "Google Mail
On Lu, 21 feb 11, 20:49:49, Peter Tynan wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> >On Lu, 21 feb 11, 12:59:56, Petrus Validus wrote:
> >
> >This one of the better "innovation" brought by Gmail, if used correctly.
> >
> >Unfortunately it's not very usable via IMAP. Example:
> >How do
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Lu, 21 feb 11, 12:59:56, Petrus Validus wrote:
This one of the better "innovation" brought by Gmail, if used correctly.
Unfortunately it's not very usable via IMAP. Example:
How do I tell mutt to tag the message as read in All Mail when I delete
it
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Petrus Validus wrote:
Get away from the web interface. Install Icedove/Evolution/Mutt and use
Google's IMAPs interface.
I use Evolution and Mutt with Google's IMAP interface. It works nicely
but I've noticed this quirky behavior when using a client via IMAP. My
messages
On Lu, 21 feb 11, 12:59:56, Petrus Validus wrote:
> > Get away from the web interface. Install Icedove/Evolution/Mutt and use
> > Google's IMAPs interface.
>
> I use Evolution and Mutt with Google's IMAP interface. It works nicely
> but I've noticed this quirky behavior when using a client via
> Get away from the web interface. Install Icedove/Evolution/Mutt and use
> Google's IMAPs interface.
I use Evolution and Mutt with Google's IMAP interface. It works nicely
but I've noticed this quirky behavior when using a client via IMAP. My
messages appear in multiple places at the same t
00
>>> From: Ron Johnson
>>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>>> Subject: Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old
>>> machines for
>>> firewall/router use)
>>> Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:54:49 + (UTC)
>>> Resent-From: debi
On 02/21/2011 12:17 AM, Peter Tynan wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ron Johnson wrote:
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 23:54:27 -0600
From: Ron Johnson
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old
machines for
firewall/router use)
Resent-Date: Mon, 21
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ron Johnson wrote:
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 23:54:27 -0600
From: Ron Johnson
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for
firewall/router use)
Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:54:49 + (UTC)
Resent
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ron Johnson wrote:
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 23:54:27 -0600
From: Ron Johnson
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for
firewall/router use)
Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 05:54:49 + (UTC)
Resent
On 02/20/2011 11:01 PM, Peter Tynan wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ron Johnson wrote:
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:02:48 -0600
From: Ron Johnson
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old
machines for
firewall/router use)
Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Feb
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011, Ron Johnson wrote:
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 22:02:48 -0600
From: Ron Johnson
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: To gmail or not to gmail (was Re: Fwd: selecting old machines for
firewall/router use)
Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 04:03:05 + (UTC)
Resent-From
On 02/20/2011 09:42 PM, Heddle Weaver wrote:
Got to get away from gmail. No list reply feature.
Get away from the web interface. Install Icedove/Evolution/Mutt and
use Google's IMAPs interface.
--
"The normal condition of mankind is tyranny and misery."
Milton Friedman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
21 matches
Mail list logo
