Re: new KDE (4.2) in Unstable, how's your experience?

2009-04-09 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <49de2a08.5030...@ultrasw.com>, Paul Scott wrote: >I still haven't figured out how to get KDM going again. It is running >but fails on not finding moreblue-orbit. I have to start xdm to get the >GUI up. Check /etc/default/kdm.d/10_desktop-base it may point to a theme or wallpaper that is not

Re: new KDE (4.2) in Unstable, how's your experience?

2009-04-09 Thread Alan Chandler
On Thursday 09 April 2009, Paul Scott wrote: > I still haven't figured out how to get KDM going again. It is > running but fails on not finding moreblue-orbit. I have to start xdm > to get the GUI up. > Install desktop-base -- Alan Chandler http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: new KDE (4.2) in Unstable, how's your experience?

2009-04-09 Thread Paul Scott
H.S. wrote: Hello, Has anybody been playing around with the new KDE we got a few days ago in Sid? The graphics are nice, but looks like the GUI is not as fast or responsive as the older one. Without any exact measurement I thought it was starting up faster on my system which is quite a bit

new KDE (4.2) in Unstable, how's your experience?

2009-04-08 Thread H.S.
Hello, Has anybody been playing around with the new KDE we got a few days ago in Sid? The graphics are nice, but looks like the GUI is not as fast or responsive as the older one. This is on a AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5600+ with 2 GB of RAM and GeForce 8600 Nvidia card. On this kin

Re: unstable KDE 3.5 nvidia xinerama dual-screen config maximize windows broken since some days

2009-03-30 Thread Bruno Voigt
Sven Joachim wrote: >> I'm running a debian/unstable system >> + with KDE 3.5 as desktop >> + using the nvidia-kernel-source/nvidia-glx driver 180.29-1 >> + two Displays in xinerama configuration. >> >> Since an usual aptitude full-upgrade some days a

Re: unstable KDE 3.5 nvidia xinerama dual-screen config maximize windows broken since some days

2009-03-30 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-03-30 22:22 +0200, Bruno Voigt wrote: > I'm running a debian/unstable system > + with KDE 3.5 as desktop > + using the nvidia-kernel-source/nvidia-glx driver 180.29-1 > + two Displays in xinerama configuration. > > Since an usual aptitude full-upgrade some days ago

unstable KDE 3.5 nvidia xinerama dual-screen config maximize windows broken since some days

2009-03-30 Thread Bruno Voigt
Hi, I'm running a debian/unstable system + with KDE 3.5 as desktop + using the nvidia-kernel-source/nvidia-glx driver 180.29-1 + two Displays in xinerama configuration. Since an usual aptitude full-upgrade some days ago I have the problem that application/windows upon maximize do it over

Re: Sid/unstable+mozilla-mplayer

2009-03-24 Thread Jimmy Johnson
Jimmy Johnson wrote: On my latest Sid/unstable update I see that mozilla-mplayer is now marked as obsolete, dose anybody have any info as way it's getting marked obsolete? apt-get -u dist-upgrade gave me no info nor did it mark mozilla-mplayer for removal. aptitude full-upgrade gave

Sid/unstable+mozilla-mplayer

2009-03-24 Thread Jimmy Johnson
On my latest Sid/unstable update I see that mozilla-mplayer is now marked as obsolete, dose anybody have any info as way it's getting marked obsolete? apt-get -u dist-upgrade gave me no info nor did it mark mozilla-mplayer for removal. aptitude full-upgrade gave me no info nor did it

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-20 Thread Michael M. Moore
ometimes you have to, in order to install what you want. Anyway, I'm just more comfortable with testing -- not saying it's better and everyone who doesn't want stable should use testing rather than unstable, just saying it's better for me. Generally, it gets newish stuff at a goo

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-20 Thread John Hasler
Michael M. Moore writes: > Many people have no problem with doing updates daily or nearly that > frequently. I don't like to be updating quite so often, and I don't like > it taking very long when I do it. Sid always has a lot of updates > ... always. Why would the mere fact that some DD has upl

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-20 Thread Michael M. Moore
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > I've been using Debian for more than three years now, but always using the > official DVDs of the most current stable version: first Sarge, and then Etch. > > Recently, many times I've been needing to use a t

Re: unstable and bugs

2009-02-19 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:20, Celejar wrote: > We had a recent thread about the reliability of Sid. I just got hit by > this 'grave' one: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515976 > > This is a bug in libxi6 which causes the system to (partially, at least > in my case) ignore t

unstable and bugs

2009-02-19 Thread Celejar
We had a recent thread about the reliability of Sid. I just got hit by this 'grave' one: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515976 This is a bug in libxi6 which causes the system to (partially, at least in my case) ignore the specified keyboard layout and revert to qwerty. The (hop

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-19 Thread Rodolfo Medina
On 2009-02-17_13:02:38, Rodolfo Medina wrote: >> I've been using Debian for more than three years now, but always using the >> official DVDs of the most current stable version: first Sarge, and then Etch. >> >> Recently, many times I've been needing to use a

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-18 Thread Paul Johnson
Rodolfo Medina wrote: > I've been using Debian for more than three years now, but always using the > official DVDs of the most current stable version: first Sarge, and then Etch. > > Recently, many times I've been needing to use a testing/unstable Debian > version >

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-18 Thread Eric Gerlach
t; Etch. > > > > Recently, many times I've been needing to use a testing/unstable Debian > > version > > for many applications that were too old in stable Debian, so now I'm > > thinking > > of switching to a testing/unstable Debian version for goo

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-17 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 07:02:38 Rodolfo Medina wrote: > I've been using Debian for more than three years now, but always using the > official DVDs of the most current stable version: first Sarge, and then > Etch. > > Recently, many times I've been needing to use

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-17 Thread Paul E Condon
On 2009-02-17_13:02:38, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > I've been using Debian for more than three years now, but always using the > official DVDs of the most current stable version: first Sarge, and then Etch. > > Recently, many times I've been needing to use a testing/unstable D

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-17 Thread Brad Rogers
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:43:24 -0500 charlie derr wrote: Hello charlie, > testing will have important things broken for longer periods of time > (due to delays in dependencies bubbling down from unstable). I've only had one problem in four years of using Testing; ALSA went belly u

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-17 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 01:02:38PM +, Rodolfo Medina wrote: ... > so now I'm thinking of switching to a testing/unstable Debian version for > good. > > Now, my question is: which one is more advisable, testing or unstable? > > Excuse the basicness of my questio

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-17 Thread thveillon.debian
>>> Rodolfo Medina wrote: >>> I've been using Debian for more than three years now, but always >>> using the >>> official DVDs of the most current stable version: first Sarge, and >>> then Etch. >>> >>> Recently, many times I&

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-17 Thread charlie derr
Kent West wrote: Rodolfo Medina wrote: I've been using Debian for more than three years now, but always using the official DVDs of the most current stable version: first Sarge, and then Etch. Recently, many times I've been needing to use a testing/unstable Debian version for many ap

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-17 Thread Kent West
Rodolfo Medina wrote: > I've been using Debian for more than three years now, but always using the > official DVDs of the most current stable version: first Sarge, and then Etch. > > Recently, many times I've been needing to use a testing/unstable Debian > version >

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-17 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/17/2009 07:02 AM, Rodolfo Medina wrote: I've been using Debian for more than three years now, but always using the official DVDs of the most current stable version: first Sarge, and then Etch. Recently, many times I've been needing to use a testing/unstable Debian versio

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-17 Thread Alex Samad
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 01:02:38PM +, Rodolfo Medina wrote: > I've been using Debian for more than three years now, but always using the > official DVDs of the most current stable version: first Sarge, and then Etch. > > Recently, many times I've been needing to use a t

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-17 Thread Adrian Chapela
Rodolfo Medina escribió: I've been using Debian for more than three years now, but always using the official DVDs of the most current stable version: first Sarge, and then Etch. Recently, many times I've been needing to use a testing/unstable Debian version for many applications tha

Re: testing or unstable?

2009-02-17 Thread Glenn Becker
Now, my question is: which one is more advisable, testing or unstable? Excuse the basicness of my question, thanks for any reply Rodolfo I have been using testing for years with few problems, if that is any indication. I know there are 'safe' ways to get apps from other releas

testing or unstable?

2009-02-17 Thread Rodolfo Medina
I've been using Debian for more than three years now, but always using the official DVDs of the most current stable version: first Sarge, and then Etch. Recently, many times I've been needing to use a testing/unstable Debian version for many applications that were too old in stable Debi

Re: Etch and unstable Belkin wireless problem

2009-01-16 Thread Joe
Just as a final note on this one: Solving the wireless card (udev related) problem seems to have fixed another glitch in the system. About 20% of the time resuming from suspend resulted in 'no such device' errors with an external USB drive, although it was still listed in mtab and by df. Had to

Re: Etch and unstable Belkin wireless problem

2009-01-14 Thread Celejar
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:32:43 +0100 Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2009-01-14 21:31 +0100, Joe wrote: > > > Sven Joachim writes: ... > >> /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules. > > > > # This file was automatically generated by the /lib/udev/write_net_rules > > # program, probably run by the per

Re: Etch and unstable Belkin wireless problem

2009-01-14 Thread Joe
7;connected/power' one remains off and, strangely, module rt2500 still seems to be required as if I boot with the card unplugged it is still loaded. Anyway, thanks for the help Sven. I know Running unstable is expected to be glitchy but this was a real irritation that I just couldn'

Re: Etch and unstable Belkin wireless problem

2009-01-14 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-01-14 21:31 +0100, Joe wrote: > Sven Joachim writes: > >> Why is wmaster0 renamed to eth1? And what about wlan0? > > Eth0 is the onboard Realtek ethernet. Don't Know why wmaster0 is > renamed. The configuration is the Debian default setup, except for > one modification to /etc/network/

Re: Etch and unstable Belkin wireless problem

2009-01-14 Thread Joe
Sven Joachim writes: > On 2009-01-14 19:41 +0100, Joe Dennigan wrote: > >> I installed Etch on a HP Pavilion ZE4900 in June 2008, and have since >> 'upgraded' to unstable. However, from the beginning there has been a >> glitch configuring my wireless ca

Re: Etch and unstable Belkin wireless problem

2009-01-14 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2009-01-14 19:41 +0100, Joe Dennigan wrote: > I installed Etch on a HP Pavilion ZE4900 in June 2008, and have since > 'upgraded' to unstable. However, from the beginning there has been a > glitch configuring my wireless card. It's a Belkin F5D7010 (RaLink > RT250

Etch and unstable Belkin wireless problem

2009-01-14 Thread Joe Dennigan
Hi. I installed Etch on a HP Pavilion ZE4900 in June 2008, and have since 'upgraded' to unstable. However, from the beginning there has been a glitch configuring my wireless card. It's a Belkin F5D7010 (RaLink RT2500). If I boot, wait for the login prompt and then insert the ca

Re: Canon A520 not detected in Testing, but works in Unstable

2008-12-21 Thread H.S.
H.S. wrote: >>> >> I will give it a shot. >> >> I have a 1G memory stick lying around. If I insert that in my card >> reader with the Testing machine, it doesn't mount and gives some errors >> like these: >> Dec 21 15:31:25 bijli kernel: [ 5784.072103] usb 2-1: device descriptor >> read/64, error

Re: Canon A520 not detected in Testing, but works in Unstable

2008-12-21 Thread H.S.
H.S. wrote: > 1. The camera is shown as "USB Imaging Interface" on desktop. Clicking > on that icon shows the above mentioned folders and files in konqeuror. > 2. The same SD card if read in a card reader, however, does not show > those folders and files, just DICM and MISC as before. This is with

Re: Canon A520 not detected in Testing, but works in Unstable

2008-12-21 Thread H.S.
Ron Johnson wrote: > On 12/21/08 15:21, H.S. wrote: >> H.S. wrote: >> >>> I think I will just try reformatting the cards and see how that works >>> out. >> >> >> I have formatted the SD card and tried it again in the camera. I >> formatted as type 0B filesystem (W95 Fat32) and made a filesystem usi

Re: Canon A520 not detected in Testing, but works in Unstable

2008-12-21 Thread H.S.
H.S. wrote: > H.S. wrote: > >> I think I will just try reformatting the cards and see how that works out. > > > I have formatted the SD card and tried it again in the camera. I > formatted as type 0B filesystem (W95 Fat32) and made a filesystem using > sudo fsck.msdos /dev/sdc1 > > But now when

Re: Canon A520 not detected in Testing, but works in Unstable

2008-12-21 Thread Ron Johnson
On 12/21/08 15:21, H.S. wrote: H.S. wrote: I think I will just try reformatting the cards and see how that works out. I have formatted the SD card and tried it again in the camera. I formatted as type 0B filesystem (W95 Fat32) and made a filesystem using sudo fsck.msdos /dev/sdc1 But now wh

Re: Canon A520 not detected in Testing, but works in Unstable

2008-12-21 Thread H.S.
H.S. wrote: > I think I will just try reformatting the cards and see how that works out. I have formatted the SD card and tried it again in the camera. I formatted as type 0B filesystem (W95 Fat32) and made a filesystem using sudo fsck.msdos /dev/sdc1 But now when the camera is mounted, I also

Re: Canon A520 not detected in Testing, but works in Unstable

2008-12-21 Thread H.S.
ijli kernel: [ 5799.288080] usb 2-1: device descriptor > read/64, error -110 > > > However, that same stick mounts properly in a machine running Unstable > and in a different card reader. So looks like it is some kind of a > hardware problem. But the confounding thing is that a

Re: Canon A520 not detected in Testing, but works in Unstable

2008-12-21 Thread H.S.
However, that same stick mounts properly in a machine running Unstable and in a different card reader. So looks like it is some kind of a hardware problem. But the confounding thing is that an SD card does not work if it is in a camera (card reader not being used) but works when it is inserted the car

Re: Canon A520 not detected in Testing, but works in Unstable

2008-12-21 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
H.S. wrote: > $> sudo fdisk /dev/sdb1 > > Command (m for help): p > > Disk /dev/sdb1: 512 MB, 512110080 bytes > 16 heads, 62 sectors/track, 1008 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 992 * 512 = 507904 bytes > Disk identifier: 0x73657250 > > This doesn't look like a partition table > Probably you select

Re: Canon A520 not detected in Testing, but works in Unstable

2008-12-21 Thread H.S.
finally the output from fdisk. Does the output below show that my cf card's partition is corrupted? (though camera works, I can transfer images from a card reader, camera woks in Unstable) -- $> sudo fdisk /dev/sdb1 Com

Re: Canon A520 not detected in Testing, but works in Unstable

2008-12-21 Thread Ron Johnson
On 12/21/08 13:22, H.S. wrote: Hello, If I plug in Canon A520 digital camera to my Testing desktop, it is not detected. The memory card in it works if I use card reader. At the same time, the camera is detected if I plug it in a Debian Unstable computer whose /var/log/syslog shows: Dec 21 13:17

Canon A520 not detected in Testing, but works in Unstable

2008-12-21 Thread H.S.
Hello, If I plug in Canon A520 digital camera to my Testing desktop, it is not detected. The memory card in it works if I use card reader. At the same time, the camera is detected if I plug it in a Debian Unstable computer whose /var/log/syslog shows: Dec 21 13:17:18 gurh kernel: [ 379.888540

pulseaudio: working in Testing and Unstable

2008-12-09 Thread H.S.
and it worked great! Next, I was able to make it work on Debain Unstable as well. Now youtube is working, BBC vidoes are working, skype is working, etc. Haven't tried audacity yet. I can change the output device from pulseaudio's device chooser. The applet is working nicely in KDE. However

Re: debootstrap - qemu - I've this error : "TSC appears to be running slowly. Marking it as unstable"

2008-12-06 Thread KLEIN Stéphane
quot; > TSC appears to be running slowly. Marking it as unstable """ > > What can I do to solve this issue ? Obviously, it isn't possible. I've asked the question on #qemu irc channel and folk answered : * I can't fix this warning * It isn't imp

debootstrap - qemu - I've this error : "TSC appears to be running slowly. Marking it as unstable"

2008-12-04 Thread KLEIN Stéphane
Hi, I've build debian image with debootstrap like in http://thread.gmane.org/ gmane.linux.debian.user/328763 messages. When I start my image with qemu, I've this error : """ TSC appears to be running slowly. Marking it as unstable """ What can I do to

Re: Why packages in testing/unstable require the newer shared libraries ?

2008-11-27 Thread Micha Feigin
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:53:01 -0500 Boris Toloknov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > I have debian stable (etch). Sometimes I want to install the newest > versions of some packages from testing/unstable. Typically I can only > install some package with the newer ver

Re: Why packages in testing/unstable require the newer shared libraries ?

2008-11-26 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 13:00, Boris Toloknov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eugene, > Thank you for the answers. Now it's more clear to me. I wish every package > was in backports or at least packages which can be put there easily because > typical home user ( including me ) doesn't want to wait for

Re: Why packages in testing/unstable require the newer shared libraries ?

2008-11-26 Thread Boris Toloknov
package along with a huge set of libraries it depends on. But I don't want to make all my system testing/unstable. 2) I can get the source of the newest gcompris, lib*-dev packages, compile it and remove the source and lib*-dev. But it takes a lot of time. Moreover I can do it but my wife can'

Re: Why packages in testing/unstable require the newer shared libraries ?

2008-11-26 Thread Kelly Clowers
packages in testing/unstable > require the newer shared libraries ? Packages in testing or unstable require newer shared libraries because they are newer. Not much point in releasing a new version of Debian without new versions of programs. *It is brand new and improved! It just happens to have exactly

Re: Why packages in testing/unstable require the newer shared libraries ?

2008-11-26 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
I have ? > 1) Upgrade the package along with a huge set of libraries it depends on. > But I don't want to make all my system testing/unstable. > 2) I can get the source of the newest gcompris, lib*-dev packages, > compile it and remove the source and lib*-dev. But it takes a lot of >

Why packages in testing/unstable require the newer shared libraries ?

2008-11-26 Thread Boris Toloknov
Hi All, I have debian stable (etch). Sometimes I want to install the newest versions of some packages from testing/unstable. Typically I can only install some package with the newer version of the shared libraries it depends on. For example dash (0.5.3-7) from etch depends on libc6 <h

Re: Rejuvenated kernel-package uploaded to unstable, please test

2008-10-14 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Manoj and other Kernel-Maintainers, Thank you for doing this hard job... I am ongoing to test the new "kernel-package". Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator 24V Electronic Engineer Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant -

Re: Rejuvenated kernel-package uploaded to unstable, please test

2008-10-10 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Be sure to get kernel-package_11.005_all.deb. The 11.005 fixes a critical regression, born of a copy&paste error from late night hacking. Sorry for the inconvenience. manoj -- "Old age and treachery will beat youth and skill every time." a coffee cup Manoj Srivastava <[EMAI

Rejuvenated kernel-package uploaded to unstable, please test

2008-10-10 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi folks, A new version of kernel-package has made its way to unstable. This is a extensive change, and addresses most of the problems that have been plaguing kernel-package, partially thanks to patches provided by other folk. The new version works with the merged x86 code in

Re: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns)

2008-09-24 Thread Jörg-Volker Peetz
running with acpi needs the kernel parameter 'nolapic' or the clock would stop in CPU power state C3. Since my first e-mail "Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns)", I enabled ACPI in the mainboard bios (MSI P6N SLI Platinum), but I don't reaalyknow anything about

Re: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns)

2008-09-24 Thread Nicolas BERCHER
with AMD Turion 64 processor on an ATI RS480 IXP SB400 chip-set running with acpi needs the kernel parameter 'nolapic' or the clock would stop in CPU power state C3. Since my first e-mail "Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns)", I enabled ACPI in the mainboa

Re: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns)

2008-09-23 Thread Jörg-Volker Peetz
What kind of hardware (processor, chip-set) are you using? What is the result of the following commands? cat /proc/cpuinfo lspci -vv cat /proc/interrupts For example, my notebook with AMD Turion 64 processor on an ATI RS480 IXP SB400 chip-set running with acpi needs the kernel parameter 'nolap

Re: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns)

2008-09-23 Thread Nicolas BERCHER
I solved some of the problems I had: My computer serves both as a web server and as a personal desktop computer, so my KDE sessions can be a few days, weeks or months long ! The problem with my sound card is solved and is due to a mistake I did when I changed the groups my login is part of (wron

Re: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns)

2008-09-23 Thread Nicolas BERCHER
Note: When the problem occured, cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource returned "jiffie" After reseting the computer it returns "tsc". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns)

2008-09-23 Thread Nicolas BERCHER
Since my last mail, I rebooted the machine (using reset, init 6 wasn't able to reboot after a few minutes). Just before reseting, top was long to start displaying stats and then it started to work nice (normal speed) and showed % CPU usage on certain processes ! It was not often the case,

Re: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns)

2008-09-23 Thread Sjoerd Hardeman
really slow, keyboard repetition seems broken or really long to start, etc. I found this in /var/log/messages: [1510354.692239] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns) I generally see messages like that; I always assumed they were harmless: Sep 23 00:13:54 lizzie kernel: Clock

Re: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns)

2008-09-23 Thread Nicolas BERCHER
yboard repetition seems broken or really long to start, etc. I found this in /var/log/messages: [1510354.692239] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns) I generally see messages like that; I always assumed they were harmless: Sep 23 00:13:54 lizzie kernel: Clocksource tsc unstable

Re: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns)

2008-09-23 Thread Sjoerd Hardeman
really long to start, etc. I found this in /var/log/messages: [1510354.692239] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns) I generally see messages like that; I always assumed they were harmless: Sep 23 00:13:54 lizzie kernel: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -85149529 ns) Celejar

Re: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns)

2008-09-22 Thread Nicolas BERCHER
c. I found this in /var/log/messages: [1510354.692239] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns) I generally see messages like that; I always assumed they were harmless: Sep 23 00:13:54 lizzie kernel: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -85149529 ns) Celejar Thank you for your

Re: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns)

2008-09-22 Thread Celejar
tc. > > I found this in /var/log/messages: > [1510354.692239] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns) I generally see messages like that; I always assumed they were harmless: Sep 23 00:13:54 lizzie kernel: Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -85149529 ns) Celejar -- mailmin.sourc

Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns)

2008-09-22 Thread Nicolas BERCHER
Hi, Since yesterday, some processes are really slow on my Lenny/Sid. KDE clock is 10 hours late, bash is really really slow, keyboard repetition seems broken or really long to start, etc. I found this in /var/log/messages: [1510354.692239] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = 51799116882 ns

Re: debian/unstable: linux > 2.6.24 + am-utils NFS-automount doesn't work

2008-08-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
same problem or not. In other case I don't think kernel team will help you in resolving the problem. > > Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: >> Bruno Voigt wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> I'm running an daily updated unstable system >>> with also custom

Re: debian/unstable: linux > 2.6.24 + am-utils NFS-automount doesn't work

2008-08-14 Thread Bruno Voigt
I want the kernel.org one not debian ones. Do you have any knowledge about available patches specific to this am-utils problem with kernel > 2.6.24 ? Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > Bruno Voigt wrote: > >> Hi all, >> I'm running an daily updated unstable system >&g

Re: debian/unstable: KDE unlock not possible, have to kill kdesktop_lock

2008-08-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Bruno Voigt wrote: > There also was a pam update installed > I've rebooted the system, problem stays there. > > Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: >> Bruno Voigt wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I'm using a daily updated debian/unstable system with KDE desktop

Re: debian/unstable: KDE unlock not possible, have to kill kdesktop_lock

2008-08-14 Thread Bruno Voigt
There also was a pam update installed I've rebooted the system, problem stays there. Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > Bruno Voigt wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'm using a daily updated debian/unstable system with KDE desktop. >> Since about a week I can no longer succesf

Re: debian/unstable: linux > 2.6.24 + am-utils NFS-automount doesn't work

2008-08-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Bruno Voigt wrote: > Hi all, > I'm running an daily updated unstable system > with also custom built recent kernel.org kernels. Debian kernel contains patches, consider trying last official kernel package. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer. signature.a

Re: debian/unstable: KDE unlock not possible, have to kill kdesktop_lock

2008-08-14 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Bruno Voigt wrote: > Hi, > I'm using a daily updated debian/unstable system with KDE desktop. > Since about a week I can no longer succesfully unlock the desktop with > my password > after auto-lockup ("authentification failed.."). > So after auto-lockup I have to

debian/unstable: linux > 2.6.24 + am-utils NFS-automount doesn't work

2008-08-14 Thread Bruno Voigt
Hi all, I'm running an daily updated unstable system with also custom built recent kernel.org kernels. Unfortunately If I try a 2.6.25 or 2.6.26 kernel the am-utils NFS automount doesn't seem to work any more, eg. cd /net/myhost.domain/.. Is there something that must be adjusted in eit

debian/unstable: KDE unlock not possible, have to kill kdesktop_lock

2008-08-14 Thread Bruno Voigt
Hi, I'm using a daily updated debian/unstable system with KDE desktop. Since about a week I can no longer succesfully unlock the desktop with my password after auto-lockup ("authentification failed.."). So after auto-lockup I have to switch to a text VT and kill the kdesktop_lock

Re: Broke /etc/apt/preferences when trying to use just one package from unstable.

2008-07-27 Thread Thomas Preud'homme
e achieved much simpler, with just one rule in > preferences: > > Package: * > Pin: release a=unstable > Pin-Priority: 1 > > This means that testing will normally be preferred to unstable > (unless you ask for a package that is not in testing yet). In other > words, you c

Re: Broke /etc/apt/preferences when trying to use just one package from unstable.

2008-07-26 Thread Bob Cox
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 14:41:38 +0200, Florian Kulzer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:51:42 +0100, James Youngman wrote: > > I modified /etc/apt/{preferences,sources.list} to get just > > flashplugin-nonfree from unstable. That seemed to work. >

Re: Broke /etc/apt/preferences when trying to use just one package from unstable.

2008-07-26 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:51:42 +0100, James Youngman wrote: > I modified /etc/apt/{preferences,sources.list} to get just > flashplugin-nonfree from unstable. That seemed to work. > However, now I find that "apt-get install libsdl1.2-dev" results in > this error:

Re: Broke /etc/apt/preferences when trying to use just one package from unstable.

2008-07-26 Thread Bob Cox
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:51:42 +0100, James Youngman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I modified /etc/apt/{preferences,sources.list} to get just > flashplugin-nonfree from unstable. That seemed to work. > However, now I find that "apt-get install libsdl1.2-dev" resu

Broke /etc/apt/preferences when trying to use just one package from unstable.

2008-07-26 Thread James Youngman
I modified /etc/apt/{preferences,sources.list} to get just flashplugin-nonfree from unstable. That seemed to work. However, now I find that "apt-get install libsdl1.2-dev" results in this error: # apt-get install libsdl1.2-dev Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tr

Re: debian/unstable: iceweasel segmentation fault

2008-07-22 Thread Kent West
Ron Johnson wrote: On 07/22/08 22:56, Kent West wrote: > Bruno Voigt wrote: >> I just found >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# cat /etc/iceweasel/iceweaselrc >> # which /dev/dsp wrapper to use >> ICEWEASEL_DSP="auto" >> >> I changed it to none and everything is fine now :-) >> > Yep; worked for me, too.

Re: debian/unstable: iceweasel segmentation fault

2008-07-22 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/22/08 22:56, Kent West wrote: > Bruno Voigt wrote: >> I just found >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# cat /etc/iceweasel/iceweaselrc >> # which /dev/dsp wrapper to use >> ICEWEASEL_DSP="auto" >> >> I changed it to none and everything is fine now :-) >> >

Re: debian/unstable: iceweasel segmentation fault

2008-07-22 Thread Kent West
Bruno Voigt wrote: I just found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# cat /etc/iceweasel/iceweaselrc # which /dev/dsp wrapper to use ICEWEASEL_DSP="auto" I changed it to none and everything is fine now :-) Yep; worked for me, too. -- Kent West <")))>< Westing Peacefully - http://ke

Re: debian/unstable: iceweasel segmentation fault

2008-07-22 Thread Preston Boyington
Bruno Voigt wrote: I just found [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# cat /etc/iceweasel/iceweaselrc # which /dev/dsp wrapper to use ICEWEASEL_DSP="auto" I changed it to none and everything is fine now :-) lol, mine was different. for me i had to use: ICEWEASEL_SDP="auto" i think my problem was that Icewe

Re: Copying home movies in Unstable.

2008-07-21 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/21/08 16:34, Matt Gracie wrote: > I've got a desktop machine running a reasonably up-to-date build of > unstable. In that machine, I've got a DVD-ROM drive as well as a DVD-RW. > > Is there a simple way to use these driv

Re: Copying home movies in Unstable.

2008-07-21 Thread Bill Thompson
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:34:04 -0400 Matt Gracie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got a desktop machine running a reasonably up-to-date build of > unstable. In that machine, I've got a DVD-ROM drive as well as a > DVD-RW. > > Is there a simple way to use t

Copying home movies in Unstable.

2008-07-21 Thread Matt Gracie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've got a desktop machine running a reasonably up-to-date build of unstable. In that machine, I've got a DVD-ROM drive as well as a DVD-RW. Is there a simple way to use these drives to copy home movies, recorded onto DVD-R media with a VH

Re: debian/unstable: iceweasel segmentation fault

2008-07-21 Thread Bruno Voigt
Florian Kulzer wrote: >> What alternative did you configure? >> > > I do not set ICEWEASEL_DSP anywhere, so iceweasel uses the default value > of "none". Did you configure anything for this environmental variable? > Check it with "env | grep ICE". > > >> Where may I change this configuratio

Re: debian/unstable: iceweasel segmentation fault

2008-07-21 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 10:54:23PM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: > > [...] > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo ldconfig -pNX | grep local > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo /sbin/ldconfig -pNX | grep local > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ > >> > >> No output. > > That looks OK; I was suspecting that you might

/usr/lib/iceweasel/iceweasel is a shell script (was Re: debian/unstable: iceweasel segmentation fault)

2008-07-21 Thread Chris Bannister
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:06:09AM +0200, Florian Kulzer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 08:51:49 +0200, Bruno Voigt wrote: > > Florian Kulzer wrote: > > > Based on what Kent has posted, can you run iceweasel as root? > > > > > Yes. that works. > > I am also using KDE, the kde package was in st

Re: debian/unstable: iceweasel segmentation fault

2008-07-21 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 14:16:12 +0200, Bruno Voigt wrote: > Florian Kulzer wrote: [...] > > Try to run it like this: > > > > ICEWEASEL_DSP=none iceweasel [...] > That works - Great ! > > Are you using Iceweasel with sound ? Yes, I just let it use the ALSA devices directly. That should work w

Re: debian/unstable: iceweasel segmentation fault

2008-07-21 Thread Bruno Voigt
Florian Kulzer wrote: > Well, so much for that idea... > > Maybe this is related to arts; I now remember that I had problems with > iceweasel a while back when I tried to get sound from a bluetooth > headset via artsdsp. > > Try to run it like this: > > ICEWEASEL_DSP=none iceweasel > > I use KDE 3.

Re: debian/unstable: iceweasel segmentation fault

2008-07-21 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 08:51:49 +0200, Bruno Voigt wrote: > Florian Kulzer wrote: > > Based on what Kent has posted, can you run iceweasel as root? > > > Yes. that works. > I am also using KDE, the kde package was in state pn, > so I reinstalled it. > Iceweasel still crashes when run as normal

Re: debian/unstable: iceweasel segmentation fault

2008-07-20 Thread Bruno Voigt
Florian Kulzer wrote: > Based on what Kent has posted, can you run iceweasel as root? > Yes. that works. I am also using KDE, the kde package was in state pn, so I reinstalled it. Iceweasel still crashes when run as normal user. > After it has crashed, grep for "EACCES" in the strace file; that

Re: debian/unstable: iceweasel segmentation fault

2008-07-20 Thread Kent West
0.1-1 Support for GNOME in Iceweasel Same result as with 3.0~rc2-2 0: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ iceweasel Segmentation fault [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ iceweasel -safe Segmentation fault System ist debian/unstable uptodate. On other debian/unstable systems it still works. I just updated a box yesterda

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >