Rob Owens wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > if xrandr --query | grep -q HDMI2; then
> > xrandr --auto --output HDMI2 --right-of HDMI1
> > fi
>
> Bob, have you tried this with two separate video cards?
Nope. Mine are all on two output video cards. Oh well.
Bob
open applications on either screen
> > > but I can't, for instance, drag an application from one screen to
> > > the other. I'm not sure if I can do that with separate video
> > > cards, though.
> > >
> > > -Rob
> >
> > ..well, pl
om one screen to the other. I'm not
> > sure if I can do that with separate video cards, though.
>
> In Squeeze the support for dual monitors changed. It is no longer in
> the configuration file, although it can be optionally placed there.
> Now multiple monitor a userland ope
ther. I'm
> > not sure if I can do that with separate video cards, though.
> >
> > -Rob
>
> ..well, play with the GUI menus, e.g. KDE's "System Settings" ->
> "Display and Monitor" -> "Multiple Monitors" or Gnome's (A
Rob Owens wrote:
> Actually, I now need to figure out how to make the two screens act as
> one. Currently, I can open applications on either screen but I can't,
> for instance, drag an application from one screen to the other. I'm not
> sure if I can do that with separa
:
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 05:44:51PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
> > > > I need to get two monitors running on two separate video cards
> > > > on a Squeeze system. Do I need to customize my xorg.conf, or
> > > > is there a simple gui tool
inputs so I opted to use
> > the onboard VGA instead of buying an adapter.
>
> ..so, all you "need" to do now, is hook up your 3'rd screen
> to your 2'nd DisplayPort. ;o)
>
Exactly!
Actually, I now need to figure out how to make the two screens act as
o
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:34:18 -0400, Rob wrote in message
<20120424223418.ga5...@aurora.owens.net>:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 05:44:51PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
> > I need to get two monitors running on two separate video cards on a
> > Squeeze system. Do I need to customiz
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 05:44:51PM -0400, Rob Owens wrote:
> I need to get two monitors running on two separate video cards on a
> Squeeze system. Do I need to customize my xorg.conf, or is there a
> simple gui tool to do this nowadays?
>
Wow, I got it working already. All I di
I need to get two monitors running on two separate video cards on a
Squeeze system. Do I need to customize my xorg.conf, or is there a
simple gui tool to do this nowadays?
Thanks
-Rob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:39:16 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:32:43 -0400 (EDT), Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2011-04-24 22:19 +0200, Stephen Powell wrote:
>>> ...
>>> The same bug can be reproduced by using the following kernel boot parameter:
>>>
>>>video=VGA-1:1024x76
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:32:43 -0400 (EDT), Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-04-24 22:19 +0200, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> ...
>> The same bug can be reproduced by using the following kernel boot parameter:
>>
>>video=VGA-1:1024x768@87i
>>
>> ...
>
> Please add these findings to the bug report.
I w
On 2011-04-24 22:19 +0200, Stephen Powell wrote:
> Actually, now that I think about it, this bug report has probably been
> sitting on the wrong queue all this time. I reported the bug against
> package xserver-xorg-video-nouveau, which is a user-space X driver. But
> the driver uses kernel mode
On Du, 24 apr 11, 16:19:05, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> But that brings up another issue, which is reporting bugs upstream.
> The official Debian policy is "Don't report bugs upstream". I quote from
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting:
>
>Don't file bugs upstream
>
>If you file a bug i
On 2011-04-24 15:19:05 Stephen Powell wrote:
> Don't file bugs upstream
>
> If you file a bug in Debian, don't send a copy to the upstream software
> maintainers yourself, as it is possible that the bug exists only in
>Debian. If necessary, the maintainer of the package will forward the bug
>
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 04:34:13 -0400 (EDT), Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 17:57:07 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> I can't use the nouveau driver because the nouveau driver doesn't work
>> with interlaced video modes. I filed a bug report a good while ago. See
>>
>>http
On Sb, 23 apr 11, 17:57:07, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> I can't use the nouveau driver because the nouveau driver doesn't work
> with interlaced video modes. I filed a bug report a good while ago. See
>
>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589452
>
> No response.
You could try
On 2011-04-24 00:14 +0200, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> There may have been DSFG-freeness concerns about the code as well, but they
> were not the primary motivator for removing the package from testing.
They were. Bug #383465¹ had been ignored for three releases already
which is really to
In <4db35418.50...@cox.net>, Ron Johnson wrote:
>But OP is correct that nv *works*. *Everywhere*.
I didn't claim otherwise. It also doesn't change the fact that it is not
currently maintained. If you'd like it maintained, I suggest you chip in
resources, possibly pooling them with other inter
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 18:14:39 -0400 (EDT), Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>> I really don't see why nv had to be dropped from the distribution.
>
> It is no longer maintained. NVidia abandoned it a while ago. It was still
> maintained by the X.org developers for a while.
On 04/23/2011 05:14 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
In<1636648964.128495.1303595827920.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com>,
Stephen Powell wrote:
I really don't see why nv had to be dropped from the distribution.
It is no longer maintained. NVidia abandoned it a while ago. It was still
mai
On 04/23/2011 04:57 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
I thought this would probably happen eventually. And it did.
I use an Nvidia video card with a RIVA TNT2 chipset. My CRT monitor,
an IBM G51, has a maximum pixel clock rate of 70 MHz. In order
to get 1024x768 resolution out of this monitor I must
In <1636648964.128495.1303595827920.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com>,
Stephen Powell wrote:
>I really don't see why nv had to be dropped from the distribution.
It is no longer maintained. NVidia abandoned it a while ago. It was still
maintained by the X.org developers for a while. However,
I thought this would probably happen eventually. And it did.
I use an Nvidia video card with a RIVA TNT2 chipset. My CRT monitor,
an IBM G51, has a maximum pixel clock rate of 70 MHz. In order
to get 1024x768 resolution out of this monitor I must use an
interlaced video mode. (There is a 1024x
On 03/22/2011 05:00 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
on 19:05 Mon 21 Mar, Ron Johnson (ron.l.john...@cox.net) wrote:
Sid (up-to-date)
xfce
nvidia driver 260.19.44-1
After switching an old 7300 card for a GeForce 210 (both are
fanless), I see that the WM has changed behavior in various odd but
tolerabl
on 19:05 Mon 21 Mar, Ron Johnson (ron.l.john...@cox.net) wrote:
> Sid (up-to-date)
> xfce
> nvidia driver 260.19.44-1
>
> After switching an old 7300 card for a GeForce 210 (both are
> fanless), I see that the WM has changed behavior in various odd but
> tolerable manners.
>
> These WM items are
Sid (up-to-date)
xfce
nvidia driver 260.19.44-1
After switching an old 7300 card for a GeForce 210 (both are
fanless), I see that the WM has changed behavior in various odd but
tolerable manners.
These WM items are now white instead of following the theme:
1. Drop-down menu bg color
2. Button
Daniel B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> However, I'd like to be able to know what text mode a card supports
> the next time I buy a video card in case I don't want to use
> framebuffer mode.
Find a machine with that card, boot from a live CD, give it vga=ask
for a kernel boot parm, and test. I bel
e finding out the text-mode resolutions of
video cards. Does anyone know of a good compilation of that
information?
Here is a list of modes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VESA_BIOS_Extensions#Linux_video_mode_numbers
I think any card that supports VESA probably has to support
1280x1024 and 24 bi
gt;>I've been having trouble finding out the text-mode resolutions of
> >>>>video cards. Does anyone know of a good compilation of that
> >>>>information?
> >>>Here is a list of modes:
> >>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VESA_BIOS_Extension
Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Nov 12, 2007 7:24 AM, Daniel B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Nov 11, 2007 7:46 PM, Daniel B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been having trouble finding out the text-mode resolutions of
video cards. Does anyone know of a good co
Jochen Schulz wrote:
Daniel B.:
Kevin,
And setting vga=771 or similar in your kernel options?
Yes. I've been using vga=10 in my kernel options (via LILO) to set
the virtual console text mode resolution at boot time.
I am not absolutely sure, but I don't think vga=10 gives you a real
frameb
On Nov 12, 2007 7:24 AM, Daniel B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kelly Clowers wrote:
> > On Nov 11, 2007 7:46 PM, Daniel B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I've been having trouble finding out the text-mode resolutions of
> >> video cards. Do
Daniel B.:
> Kevin,
>
>> And setting vga=771 or similar in your kernel options?
>
> Yes. I've been using vga=10 in my kernel options (via LILO) to set
> the virtual console text mode resolution at boot time.
I am not absolutely sure, but I don't think vga=10 gives you a real
framebuffer. It jus
Kelly Clowers wrote:
On Nov 11, 2007 7:46 PM, Daniel B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been having trouble finding out the text-mode resolutions of
video cards. Does anyone know of a good compilation of that
information?
Here is a list of modes:
http://en.wikiped
Kevin,
Kevin Mark wrote:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 10:46:53PM -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
I've been having trouble finding out the text-mode resolutions of
video cards. Does anyone know of a good compilation of that
information?
Relatedly, are they any good tutorials on switching from
On Nov 11, 2007 7:46 PM, Daniel B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been having trouble finding out the text-mode resolutions of
> video cards. Does anyone know of a good compilation of that
> information?
Here is a list of modes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 10:46:53PM -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
> I've been having trouble finding out the text-mode resolutions of
> video cards. Does anyone know of a good compilation of that
> information?
>
> Relatedly, are they any good tutorials on switching from using
>
I've been having trouble finding out the text-mode resolutions of
video cards. Does anyone know of a good compilation of that
information?
Relatedly, are they any good tutorials on switching from using
hardware text-mode for non-X virtual consoles to using ... um ...
whatever the name is o
*** 2) Downgrade to xorg 7.0 since this setup was working before
I would not like to to this, but it's an option. My dual setup worked
out of the box in a previous xorg version. I wonder how I could use
an older xorg in Debian sid.
Ok. A few hours and I got it. Let's reply myself
a dual-output
video card. I'd prefer to fix the problem since I'd have to wait sometime
before getting the new video card and I'd have 2 spare video
cards around.
*** 2) Downgrade to xorg 7.0 since this setup was working before
I would not like to to this, but it'
On 4/7/07, Nelson Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a good start, you could also try older versions of
> xserver-xorg-video-nv and xserver-xorg-core and see if it broke in a
> specific upgrade. You can find older packages here,
> http://snapshot.debian.net/
>
> Otherwise, I suggest you
That's a good start, you could also try older versions of
xserver-xorg-video-nv and xserver-xorg-core and see if it broke in a
specific upgrade. You can find older packages here,
http://snapshot.debian.net/
Otherwise, I suggest you use the reportbug tool to file a bug report for
xserver-xorg-vide
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 17:01 -0500, Nelson Castillo wrote:
> When it crashes, the screen goes black and the CPU usage increases
> (the CPU fan goes mad :)).
>
> > If you have time, try each card separately and see if you can pinpoint
> > the crash to a specific configuration.
>
> Done! I didn't ge
g the free nv driver.
Yes.
dpkg -l| grep nvidia
Post the output from there.
Nothing new... This installation has 2 years and I've had 5 about
different video
cards (and 3 PCs) since then. Same installation.
rc nvidia-glx-dev 1.0.8776-4
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 15:48 -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> What nVidia modules are you using? 9129 was the last version that
> supported the NV18 chipset. I know, I have an exact duplicate of the
> card.
Looks like he's using the free nv driver.
Anyway, getting a backtrace of the crash, preferably
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 14:38 -0500, Nelson Castillo wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I had a successful setup a long time ago with Xorg and xinerama
> in Debian sid. I use 2 monitors and 2 video cards.
>
> It used to work well, but now I doesn't work anymore, even with the
> same confi
Hi.
I had a successful setup a long time ago with Xorg and xinerama
in Debian sid. I use 2 monitors and 2 video cards.
It used to work well, but now I doesn't work anymore, even with the
same configuration file I had before. I didn't have the time to debug, until
today.
Has somethi
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 11:55:05AM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> >Depending what you want as a window manager etc.. You have to scan 10
>
> OK. I will now reinstall and scan the pants of the entire
> distribution.
STOP! You don't have to reinstall. You've got a working CLI right?
y
o.
I should probably reconfigure the Xwindows to make it more precisely set up.
I can also have a go at configuring the printer. I am well accustomed to
doing this in Fedora.
Regards,
Michael Fothergill
From: Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re:
Kent West wrote:
> gpm also is a quicker means of
> experimenting with mouse types than trying to "startx" over and over
> until you get it right.
>
Or, to find the correct location, you can type "cat /dev/psaux" and move
the mouse around; if you see a bunch of garbage appear on the screen,
you
Michael Fothergill wrote:
> Dear Debian folks,
>
> I have installed Debian on my PC here. It runs a 1200MHz Athlon CPU
> and has one 20GB disk on it with Fedora Core 5 on it and now after
> deleted Windows a second disk (primary) which is 40GB in size has now
> got the Desktop Debian installation
Thanks for responding,
mikef
From: M-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: video cards, the mouse, Xfree86 and Debian installation.
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:42:25 +1000
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 21:10, Michael Fothergill shared this with u
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 21:10, Michael Fothergill shared this with us all:
>--> Dear Debian folks,
>-->
>--> I have installed Debian on my PC here.
Which Debian? Sarge, Etch or Sid?
>It runs a 1200MHz Athlon CPU and
> has --> one 20GB disk on it with Fedora Core 5 on it and now after delete
Dear Debian folks,
I have installed Debian on my PC here. It runs a 1200MHz Athlon CPU and has
one 20GB disk on it with Fedora Core 5 on it and now after deleted Windows a
second disk (primary) which is 40GB in size has now got the Desktop Debian
installation on it.
At least I think it does
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 08:06:01AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> "Manaen Schlabach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It seems like everyone agrees that Video card manufacturers really
> > don't want to give up their 3d stuff and that seems to be the primary
> > reason we can't get a "good" open source
Christopher Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So... what's the "interesting" stuff in the driver that they're trying
>> to protect? Texture management?
>
> I think the 'interesting' stuff is the nuts and botls of sending data,
> because I think they're afraid someone will reverse-engineer thei
Miles writes:
> So... what's the "interesting" stuff in the driver that they're trying to
> protect? Texture management?
Several different things. They often don't own the copyrights to
everything in the driver: they license some of it from other companies.
They also often license parts of the d
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 08:06:01AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> "Manaen Schlabach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It seems like everyone agrees that Video card manufacturers really
> > don't want to give up their 3d stuff and that seems to be the primary
> > reason we can't get a "good" open source
Miles Bader wrote:
> "Manaen Schlabach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>It seems like everyone agrees that Video card manufacturers really
>>don't want to give up their 3d stuff and that seems to be the primary
>>reason we can't get a "good" open source driver.
>
>
> S, sowhat exactly is in the
"Manaen Schlabach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems like everyone agrees that Video card manufacturers really
> don't want to give up their 3d stuff and that seems to be the primary
> reason we can't get a "good" open source driver.
S, sowhat exactly is in the video card drivers they're so p
On Sat, 2006-04-22 at 12:01 -0400, Manaen Schlabach wrote:
> On 4/21/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 03:37 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > > On Apr 19 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
>
> It seems like everyone agrees that Video card manufacturers really
> don't
But I'm frequently asked (by friends) to recommend hardware that would
> > run Linux well and, well, the topic of video cards is where I get most
> > undecided...
> >
> > Thanks for any experiences shared, Rogério.
>
> Back when I had an NVIDIA TNT2/M64, I installed
a beast? I have never had the
> opportunity of using a binary driver for video, since I don't need 3D
> and my trusty, old Matrox card is keeping up with my necessities.
>
> But I'm frequently asked (by friends) to recommend hardware that would
> run Linux well and,
On Thursday 20 April 2006 23:37, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Apr 19 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Still, if they come out with reasonably priced cards that can do
> > 3D like an NVIDIA FX 5200 using the nvidia binary driver, I'd
>
> How exactly is the performance of such a beast? I have never had the
nce I don't need 3D
and my trusty, old Matrox card is keeping up with my necessities.
But I'm frequently asked (by friends) to recommend hardware that would
run Linux well and, well, the topic of video cards is where I get most
undecided...
Thanks for any experiences shared, Rogéri
On Apr 19 2006, Ron Johnson wrote:
> When Intel makes "stand-alone" video cards, they'll get more notice
> from those of us who don't want on-board video.
Actually, between the choices of being able to use the driver even if
the card is on-board or not using it (or it
; get it to install since i am new to linux, but it was there.
>
> When Intel makes "stand-alone" video cards, they'll get more notice
> from those of us who don't want on-board video.
>
> --
> -
r on intel 82810 onboard video on they're
> > > > site at www.intel.com in the downloads and support section, i
> > > > couldn't get it to install since i am new to linux, but it was there.
> > >
> > > When Intel makes "stand-alone&quo
w.intel.com in the downloads and support section, i couldn't
> > > get it to install since i am new to linux, but it was there.
> >
> > When Intel makes "stand-alone" video cards, they'll get more notice
> > from those of us who don't want on-bo
et it to install since i am new to linux, but it was there.
>
> When Intel makes "stand-alone" video cards, they'll get more notice
> from those of us who don't want on-board video.
But they do. I distinctly remember installing about a hundred Intel
i880-based Intel
to install since i am new to linux, but it was there.When Intel makes "stand-alone" video cards, they'll get more noticefrom those of us who don't want on-board video.-- -Ron Johnson, Jr.Jefferson, LA USA"
makes "stand-alone" video cards, they'll get more notice
from those of us who don't want on-board video.
--
-
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
"... going to war without France is like going deer hunting
w
i have found a video driver on intel 82810 onboard video on they're site at www.intel.com in the downloads and support section, i couldn't get it to install since i am new to linux, but it was there.Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Manaen and others interested in Freedom.On Apr 18 200
Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Manaen and others interested in Freedom.On Apr 18 2006, Manaen Schlabach wrote:> From a recent ZDNet article> > http://news.com.com/2102-7344_3-6061491.html?tag=st.util.printYes, I read this very same article with great interest (and what a goodtimi
Hi, Manaen and others interested in Freedom.
On Apr 18 2006, Manaen Schlabach wrote:
> From a recent ZDNet article
>
> http://news.com.com/2102-7344_3-6061491.html?tag=st.util.print
Yes, I read this very same article with great interest (and what a good
timing it had, considering our discuss
Hi!!!
I am planning to use backstreet ruby to run a multi-headed PC.
I already have a system (i810) with inbuilt agp card. Its X is setup
correctly and its currently running Debian woody with FVWM window
manager. I am planning to buy another PCI VGA card. What type will you
recommend,which is eco
Hi all.
I have a strange problem with my machine. I have an old 4megs agp card and a
pci voodoo 3dfx. I can set X to boot on my pci with no problem at all,
by specifying in XFConfig-4
Section "Device"
Identifier "Voodoo3"
VendorName "3dfx"
Driver "tdfx"
> Anyone offer a tip?
I just re-installed my entire system. From a single-CD rescue disk.
Everything was done by hand, except for a few config files that I had
stashed away. Hopefully this means I have everything in my notes that
you'll need to get nvidia working. Note: I'm on a laptop and probabl
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 12:13:10 -0600
"Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The 4191 version caused problems for everybody. I don't know anyone
> > who was able to make it work in Debian, Mandrake or RedHat.
>
> Worked fine here. Though it didn't support Dual Head on my chipset at
> the
Quoting Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 08:45, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> > Quoting Kevin McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > So here's the question -- how many different ways do I need to tell the
> > > system to keepen its little mittens offen those packages? Can you sugg
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:06:59AM -0400, Kevin McKinley wrote:
> The 4191 version caused problems for everybody. I don't know anyone
> who was able to make it work in Debian, Mandrake or RedHat.
Worked fine here. Though it didn't support Dual Head on my chipset at
the time, it did support TwinV
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 08:45, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote:
> Quoting Kevin McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > So here's the question -- how many different ways do I need to tell the
> > system to keepen its little mittens offen those packages? Can you suggest
> > another/better way to accomplish this?
>
Quoting Kevin McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So here's the question -- how many different ways do I need to tell the
> system to keepen its little mittens offen those packages? Can you suggest
> another/better way to accomplish this?
>
Don't mix dselect/apt-get and aptitude. Stick to one or the
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 20:15:08 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote:
> > When you install the Debian nvidia packages, the tarballs are put in
> > /usr/src.
>
> Only if you don't care which version you get. See in my message my
> description of problems with the current version at the time of
Kevin McKinley wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > wget http://205.158.109.140/XFree86_40/1.0-2880/NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-2880.tar.gz
> > wget http://205.158.109.140/XFree86_40/1.0-2880/NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-2880.tar.gz
> wgetting the tarballs is no longer necessary; NVIDIA now allows them to be
> distributed.
On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 13:07:29 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote:
> Get the bits onto your machine:
> cd /usr/src
> wget
> http://205.158.109.140/XFree86_40/1.0-2880/NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-2880.tar.gz
> wget
> http://205.158.109.140/XFree86_40/1.0-2880/NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-2880.tar.gz
> sud
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 01:07:29PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Hope this helps,
> Bob
Thanks Bob, I appreciate the help, I will give it a whirl.
Kind Regards
Dan Hunt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Hunt wrote:
> I went "apt-get install nvidia-kernel-src" and
>"apt-get install nvidia-glx-src"
> and I found the instructions a bit confusing,
> /usr/doc/nvidia-kernel-src/README.Debian
>
> cd linux ( or your kernel source directory )
>
> O.K. I have a stock kernel installed
> 2.
> Go to the NVIDIA web site and download their drivers, or get the packages
> nvidia-kernel-src and nvidia-glx-src from Debian.
>
> Follow the instructions.
>
I went "apt-get install nvidia-kernel-src" and
"apt-get install nvidia-glx-src"
and I found the instructions a bit confusing,
/usr
On Sat, 31 May 2003 21:23:19 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote:
>From the utah-glx FAQ:
"GLX is basically the glue that ties OpenGL and X together. Most of the code
in Utah-GLX is actually dealing with graphics chipset specific drivers code.
Most of the OpenGL support is provided by Mesa
On Sat, 31 May 2003 18:41:45 -0300
james leclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Setting up woody on my main box. Using geforce4 mx pci video card. After
> installing x and running starx, I get error messages stating "no screens
> found". When installing x, I had chose the nv server. Was this co
[Drifting from original topic and on to tuxracer problems...]
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > The framebuffer is needed for some programs, notably tuxracer, which
> > use it and you won't be able to run those programs without it. Darn!
>
> Are you sure? I'm running XFree 4.2.1 with t
On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 19:34, Bob Proulx wrote:
> james leclair wrote:
[snip]
> The "nv" driver does not support framebuffer. But if you were like me
> that option pulled you in. Find this in your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4
> file and comment it out.
>
> Option "UseFBDev" "true"
>
> T
james leclair wrote:
>
> Setting up woody on my main box. Using geforce4 mx pci video card. After
> installing x and running starx, I get error messages stating "no screens
> found". When installing x, I had chose the nv server. Was this correct? Had
> good experiences on my test comp with Debi
On Sat, 31 May 2003 18:41:45 -0300
james leclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Setting up woody on my main box. Using geforce4 mx pci video card.
> After installing x and running starx, I get error messages stating "no
> screens found". When installing x, I had chose the nv server. Was this
> co
Setting up woody on my main box. Using geforce4 mx pci video card. After
installing x and running starx, I get error messages stating "no screens
found". When installing x, I had chose the nv server. Was this correct? Had
good experiences on my test comp with Debian and would really love to get
Hanasaki JiJi said:
> Any thoughts on this board? or suggestions to something similar?
> http://www.leadtek.com/graphics/a250td/a250td.htm
to get best performance your gonna need the 3rd party closed source
drivers in either ATI or nvidia's case. I personally use nvidia, only
have 1 system with a
Hello all,
I am seeking your input on video cards. The goal is to upgrade from the
current voodoo3500tv
What is the minium chipset in NVidia/ATI that has slightly more power
than the voodoo3500tv?
Which AllInWonder's are supported by Woody?
Which NVidia chips are supported by Woody?
Hi All & James,
who inquires after ATI drivers & Debian Tux.
I have a Radeon 9000 Por & I am running it via the dri-sourceforge
stuff. Tiz nice.
I used Synaptic to do the dirty work & it is a honey of an app. Well
done to the geeks that put that beastie together.
There are "official" ATI dri
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
