Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-18 Thread Bret Busby
On 18/09/2014, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, John. But we should be going OT On Thursday 18 September 2014 00:45:24 John Hasler wrote: Lisi writes: There are four countries in the United Kingdom: Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England. In roughly the same sense in

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-18 Thread Bret Busby
On 18/09/2014, Bret Busby bret.bu...@gmail.com wrote: On 18/09/2014, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, John. But we should be going OT On Thursday 18 September 2014 00:45:24 John Hasler wrote: Lisi writes: There are four countries in the United Kingdom: Ireland, Scotland,

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-18 Thread Darac Marjal
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 06:42:29AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 17 September 2014 23:14:33 Martin Read wrote: Ahem. *Northern* Ireland. *Ireland*, unqualified, is the name of the second largest of the British Isles, and of the parliamentary republic which occupies five-sixths of

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-18 Thread Peter Nieman
On 18/09/14 07:42, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 17 September 2014 23:14:33 Martin Read wrote: Is it just me who's wondering why no one - no powerful list master - is trying to stop this? This exchange of whatever is really *totally* OT, if that word has any meaning at all. p.

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-18 Thread Raffaele Morelli
On 18/09/14 at 01:33pm, Peter Nieman wrote: On 18/09/14 07:42, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Wednesday 17 September 2014 23:14:33 Martin Read wrote: Is it just me who's wondering why no one - no powerful list master - is trying to stop this? +1 This exchange of whatever is really

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-18 Thread Jerry Stuckle
On 9/18/2014 1:53 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: Sorry, John. But we should be going OT On Thursday 18 September 2014 00:45:24 John Hasler wrote: Lisi writes: There are four countries in the United Kingdom: Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England. In roughly the same sense in which there are

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-18 Thread John Hasler
Lisi writes: It is a complete misunderstanding (misinformation?) that [the countries that constitute the UK] are merely States It is a complete misunderstanding that the states that constitute the USA are merely provinces. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA -- To

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-18 Thread Gian Uberto Lauri
John Hasler writes: Lisi writes: It is a complete misunderstanding (misinformation?) that [the countries that constitute the UK] are merely States It is a complete misunderstanding that the states that constitute the USA are merely provinces. and none of them comes in .deb . --

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-18 Thread Darac Marjal
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 02:48:44PM +0200, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: John Hasler writes: Lisi writes: It is a complete misunderstanding (misinformation?) that [the countries that constitute the UK] are merely States It is a complete misunderstanding that the states that constitute

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Gian Uberto Lauri
Steve Litt writes: On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:20:46 +0200 Gian Uberto Lauri sa...@eng.it wrote: Often in the past young people arrived screaming We have the great new thing that will change all, and a lot of great new things were lost in time like tears in rain... Let's not

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Joel Rees
2014/09/15 2:53 Bartosz Olender bartek.olen...@gmail.com: I am probably one of the few people (at least from what I can see by following this topic) on this mailing list, that don't mind systemd and see that the benefits of switching to it outclass the negatives. Therefore I want to poke my

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Gian Uberto Lauri
Joel Rees writes: Steve's working on alternatives to debian+systemd.* and I'm trying to figure out what useful function systemd and friends really perform so that we can make something that the developers can use instead. Steve seems to be having more success than I. Nice to read this!

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Bartosz Olender
W dniu 17.09.2014 10:13, Joel Rees pisze: Very nice social engineering job. Turned into a nice tarpit, too. You are really overrating my ability, all I wanted to do was to share my opinion and start a mature discussion about why systemd is not welcome in the Linux community. And honestly,

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Chris Bannister
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 06:20:46PM +0200, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: Often in the past young people arrived screaming We have the great new thing that will change all, and a lot of great new things were lost in time like tears in rain... Ummm, what has the Macintosh got to do with this? :) --

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Gian Uberto Lauri
Chris Bannister writes: On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 06:20:46PM +0200, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: Often in the past young people arrived screaming We have the great new thing that will change all, and a lot of great new things were lost in time like tears in rain... Ummm, what has the

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Curt
On 2014-09-17, Gian Uberto Lauri sa...@eng.it wrote: Ummm, what has the Macintosh got to do with this? :) Nothing. I was talking about GNU/Linux. I think that was humor (smiley). I was going to ask you what the whole the thing had to do with Blade Runner, but I didn't. -- To

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread The Wanderer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 09/17/2014 at 04:13 AM, Joel Rees wrote: Guys we've got better things to do than get sucked into this kind of quibbling. Steve's working on alternatives to debian+systemd.* and I'm trying to figure out what useful function systemd and

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Gian Uberto Lauri
Curt writes: On 2014-09-17, Gian Uberto Lauri sa...@eng.it wrote: Ummm, what has the Macintosh got to do with this? :) Nothing. I was talking about GNU/Linux. I think that was humor (smiley). Really? I did not see any. I was going to ask you what the whole the thing

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Curt
On 2014-09-17, Gian Uberto Lauri sa...@eng.it wrote: I think that was humor (smiley). Really? I did not see any. Yes, that's obvious enough. I was going to ask you what the whole the thing had to do with Blade Runner, but I didn't. Still can't see the humor. Maybe you guys have

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 16:54:02 Curt wrote: On 2014-09-17, Gian Uberto Lauri sa...@eng.it wrote: I think that was humor (smiley). Really? I did not see any. Yes, that's obvious enough. I was going to ask you what the whole the thing had to do with Blade Runner, but I

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Gian Uberto Lauri
Curt writes: Still can't see the humor. Maybe you guys have something strong to share... Merely a cinematic reference. My error, they told me! Never argue... -- /\ ___Ubuntu: ancient /___/\_|_|\_|__|___Gian Uberto Lauri_

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Gian Uberto Lauri
Lisi Reisz writes: Sorry Gian Uberto Lauri, this is an international list, but it is also an English speaking one. Native speakers will occasionally stray into humour which is not obvious to all nationalities. I knew I should have not opened this e-mail according to the Never argue...

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Bret Busby
On 18/09/2014, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday 17 September 2014 16:54:02 Curt wrote: On 2014-09-17, Gian Uberto Lauri sa...@eng.it wrote: I think that was humor (smiley). Really? I did not see any. Yes, that's obvious enough. I was going to ask you what the

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 18:06:12 Bret Busby wrote: And, in a couple of days time, we get to find whether the term british will just be a historical thing. No, the island isn't going to disappear! It may just have more than one sovereign state in it. The Union is quite recent. The

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Bzzzz
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:34:19 +0100 Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote: The island dates back to the end of the last Ice Age. And, sometimes, its mentality too ;-p) -- Chloé: What do you think about my font? William: Sorry, I don't talk font with a girl on the first evening

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Bob Holtzman
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 05:13:24PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote: 2014/09/15 2:53 Bartosz Olender bartek.olen...@gmail.com: I am probably one of the few people (at least from what I can see by following this topic) on this mailing list, that don't mind systemd and see that the benefits of

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Bret Busby
On 18/09/2014, Lisi Reisz lisi.re...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday 17 September 2014 18:06:12 Bret Busby wrote: And, in a couple of days time, we get to find whether the term british will just be a historical thing. No, the island isn't going to disappear! It may just have more than one

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 21:20:19 Bret Busby wrote: Out here in the federation of penal colonies - the anti-poads, what we have heard, of the arguments and predictions of the leaders of the parliamentary parties of the english parliament, makes it appear that the english parliament

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Martin Read
On 17/09/14 22:54, Lisi Reisz wrote: Ah! That is the first time you, or anyone else, ha(ve)(s) even hinted at England. And there is no English Parliament, so I don't know how you Antipodeans hear anything from non-existent English Parliamentary parties. There is a UK Parliament, an Irish

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Nate Bargmann
Just sail on over to this side of the pond. We can park you close to Florida. The weather is fine save for a minor summer/autumn storm every few years. We need a crisis like adding a 51st star to the flag, but that's minor. Just be sure to bring the Triumph factory along with you! It would be

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread John Hasler
Lisi writes: There are four countries in the United Kingdom: Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England. In roughly the same sense in which there are fifty countries in the USA. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 23:14:33 Martin Read wrote: Ahem. *Northern* Ireland. *Ireland*, unqualified, is the name of the second largest of the British Isles, and of the parliamentary republic which occupies five-sixths of that island. Mea culpa! I stand corrected. But at that rate

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-17 Thread Lisi Reisz
Sorry, John. But we should be going OT On Thursday 18 September 2014 00:45:24 John Hasler wrote: Lisi writes: There are four countries in the United Kingdom: Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England. In roughly the same sense in which there are fifty countries in the USA. No. They are

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Gian Uberto Lauri
On 09/15/2014 03:31 AM, sa...@eng.it wrote: Bartosz Olender writes: Therefore I want to poke my three cents into this discussion reminding that GNU is *Not* Unix May I recall that most of the systemd-haters knows the recursive expansion of GNU? Most of us are no

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Bret Busby
On 15/09/2014, Bartosz Olender bartek.olen...@gmail.com wrote: snip Plan 9 is considered a spiritual successor to UNIX with it's principles taken to the extreme. But it never took off, it's still researched on but as I see it, besides researching how far we can push this UNIX concept, I

But there is a choice to not use systemd (war: Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community)

2014-09-16 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Dienstag, 16. September 2014, 08:46:36 schrieb Charlie: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:48:02 +0200 Martin Steigerwald sent: I have mixed thoughts and feelings about systemd… but on the other hand I think discussing this further here… is… a waste of time – as it won´t change anything. I'm

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Linux-Fan
On 09/16/2014 09:56 AM, Bret Busby wrote: On 15/09/2014, Bartosz Olender bartek.olen...@gmail.com wrote: snip Plan 9 is considered a spiritual successor to UNIX with it's principles taken to the extreme. But it never took off, it's still researched on but as I see it, besides researching

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Chris Bannister
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:16:32PM -0400, Ric Moore wrote: Sorry, I see only that he represented his views, which also happens to coincide with my own. Please, if you have to label someone, you've lost your argument's points from the get-go. :) Ric Also his views were known long before 1995

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Miles Fidelman
Bret Busby wrote: Please remember, by virtue of its name, the mailing list appears to be a list for Debian users - for everyday, common, layman type users, like me, rather than people schooled in obscure concepts; users who may be seeking advice and assistance with day to day, layman type

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Chris Bannister
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 09:00:40AM +0200, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: Sorry? Should we add some dressing to the barbecue? O.K. I am not an English native speaker. Not a good idea, it only causes eye watering smoke to billow everywhere. You are better off adding dressing to the food once it has

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Doug
On 09/16/2014 03:00 AM, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: And the GNU project started in 1984, so in the early '90 we already were working on bash an gcc and start enjoying the GNU version of some command in an improved Unix experience. AH! You said it yourself! ...an improved _Unix_ experience.

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Gian Uberto Lauri
Doug writes: On 09/16/2014 03:00 AM, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: And the GNU project started in 1984, so in the early '90 we already were working on bash an gcc and start enjoying the GNU version of some command in an improved Unix experience. AH! You said it yourself! ...an

Re: But there is a choice to not use systemd (war: Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community)

2014-09-16 Thread Andre N Batista
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 09:54:12AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: Am Dienstag, 16. September 2014, 08:46:36 schrieb Charlie: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:48:02 +0200 Martin Steigerwald sent: I have mixed thoughts and feelings about systemd… but on the other hand I think discussing this

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Miles Fidelman
Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: Doug writes: On 09/16/2014 03:00 AM, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: And the GNU project started in 1984, so in the early '90 we already were working on bash an gcc and start enjoying the GNU version of some command in an improved Unix experience. AH!

Re: But there is a choice to not use systemd (war: Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community)

2014-09-16 Thread Martin Read
On 16/09/14 17:43, Andre N Batista wrote: I find your lack of imagination disturbing. So disturbing that I here and now propose a better approach: dox da madafuka hairy poetter and point these threads as his fault, his problem. For years to come people would remember what happens to those who

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Joe
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:25:16 -0400 Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: Doug writes: On 09/16/2014 03:00 AM, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: And the GNU project started in 1984, so in the early '90 we already were working on bash an gcc and

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Joe
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:25:16 -0400 Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: Doug writes: On 09/16/2014 03:00 AM, Gian Uberto Lauri wrote: And the GNU project started in 1984, so in the early '90 we already were working on bash an gcc and

Re: But there is a choice to not use systemd (war: Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community)

2014-09-16 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Andre N Batista wrote: dox da madafuka hairy poetter and point these threads as his fault, his problem. Threats like this have absolutely no place on Debian mailing lists. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com Grimble left his mother in the

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Joe
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:25:16 -0400 Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: So... to whomever it was that said GNU is irrelevant, or words to that effect... Debian, and most (all?) Linux distros are very much dependent on GNU. Arguably, Debian is more intertwined with GNU than

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Joe
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:49:21 +0100 Joe j...@jretrading.com wrote: Sorry about that, Claws seems to have developed hiccups, and has been firmly thumped on the back... -- Joe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Steve Litt
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:20:46 +0200 Gian Uberto Lauri sa...@eng.it wrote: Often in the past young people arrived screaming We have the great new thing that will change all, and a lot of great new things were lost in time like tears in rain... Let's not make it about age. I bet I can find

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Steve Litt
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:12:44 +0100 Joe j...@jretrading.com wrote: On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:49:21 +0100 Joe j...@jretrading.com wrote: Sorry about that, Claws seems to have developed hiccups, and has been firmly thumped on the back... LOL, Claws sucks, but it's the best email client

Re: But there is a choice to not use systemd (war: Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community)

2014-09-16 Thread Ric Moore
On 09/16/2014 01:36 PM, Don Armstrong wrote: On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Andre N Batista wrote: dox da madafuka hairy poetter and point these threads as his fault, his problem. Threats like this have absolutely no place on Debian mailing lists. Threat? I couldn't figure out what he was saying,

Re: But there is a choice to not use systemd (war: Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community)

2014-09-16 Thread Bzzzz
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 10:36:51 -0700 Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote: Threats like this have absolutely no place on Debian mailing lists. Let it be, at this rate there will be blood (a lot) for Halloween ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: But there is a choice to not use systemd (war: Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community)

2014-09-16 Thread Cindy-Sue Causey
On 9/16/14, Martin Steigerwald mar...@lichtvoll.de wrote: Am Dienstag, 16. September 2014, 08:46:36 schrieb Charlie: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:48:02 +0200 Martin Steigerwald sent: I have mixed thoughts and feelings about systemd… but on the other hand I think discussing this further here… is… a

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Bret Busby
On 16/09/2014, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: Bret Busby wrote: Please remember, by virtue of its name, the mailing list appears to be a list for Debian users - for everyday, common, layman type users, like me, rather than people schooled in obscure concepts; users who may

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-16 Thread Miles Fidelman
Bret Busby wrote: On 16/09/2014, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote: Bret Busby wrote: Please remember, by virtue of its name, the mailing list appears to be a list for Debian users - for everyday, common, layman type users, like me, rather than people schooled in obscure

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-15 Thread saint
Bartosz Olender writes: Therefore I want to poke my three cents into this discussion reminding that GNU is *Not* Unix May I recall that most of the systemd-haters knows the recursive expansion of GNU? and because of that we should have the freedom to create better solutions, rather than

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-15 Thread Doug
On 09/15/2014 03:31 AM, sa...@eng.it wrote: Bartosz Olender writes: Therefore I want to poke my three cents into this discussion reminding that GNU is *Not* Unix May I recall that most of the systemd-haters knows the recursive expansion of GNU? Most of us are no interested in what

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-15 Thread Bzzzz
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:07:35 -0400 Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote: Most of us are no interested in what Stallman or whoever created back in 1995. We don't think of Linux as GNU. Ahhh, so you are the declared and _democratically elected_ spokesman of, let's say 80% of the Linux community

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-15 Thread Joe
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:07:35 -0400 Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote: On 09/15/2014 03:31 AM, sa...@eng.it wrote: Bartosz Olender writes: Therefore I want to poke my three cents into this discussion reminding that GNU is *Not* Unix May I recall that most of the systemd-haters

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-15 Thread Bartosz Olender
W dniu 15.09.2014 19:39, Joe pisze: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:07:35 -0400 Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote: On 09/15/2014 03:31 AM, sa...@eng.it wrote: Bartosz Olender writes: Therefore I want to poke my three cents into this discussion reminding that GNU is *Not* Unix May I recall

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-15 Thread Bzzzz
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:32:45 +0200 Bartosz Olender bartek.olen...@gmail.com wrote: I am not defending systemd programmers but, could you clarify what do you exactly mean by bad programming practices? Creating weird situations about things that used to work well for _years_ (eg: the kernel

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-15 Thread Joe
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:32:45 +0200 Bartosz Olender bartek.olen...@gmail.com wrote: W dniu 15.09.2014 19:39, Joe pisze: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:07:35 -0400 Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote: On 09/15/2014 03:31 AM, sa...@eng.it wrote: Bartosz Olender writes: Therefore I want to

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-15 Thread Ric Moore
On 09/15/2014 11:33 AM, B wrote: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:07:35 -0400 Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote: Most of us are no interested in what Stallman or whoever created back in 1995. We don't think of Linux as GNU. Ahhh, so you are the declared and _democratically elected_ spokesman of,

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-15 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 15. September 2014, 21:55:29 schrieb Joe: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:32:45 +0200 Bartosz Olender bartek.olen...@gmail.com wrote: W dniu 15.09.2014 19:39, Joe pisze: On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:07:35 -0400 Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote: On 09/15/2014 03:31 AM,

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-15 Thread Bzzzz
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:16:32 -0400 Ric Moore wayward4...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, I see only that he represented his views, which also happens to coincide with my own. Please, if you have to label someone, you've lost your argument's points from the get-go. :) Ric I don't wanna stigmatize

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-15 Thread Charlie
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:48:02 +0200 Martin Steigerwald sent: I have mixed thoughts and feelings about systemd… but on the other hand I think discussing this further here… is… a waste of time – as it won´t change anything. I'm uncertain if that's correct. It certainly highlights some features

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-15 Thread John Hasler
Charlie writes: Though I'm not a programmer and really know very little about Debian [as someone once said - the lifetime learning experience] imagine the installer could present a choice of systemd or sys** whatever? The wiki could point out advantages and disadvantages of both? That is

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-15 Thread Joel Roth
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 06:08:49PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: Charlie writes: Though I'm not a programmer and really know very little about Debian [as someone once said - the lifetime learning experience] imagine the installer could present a choice of systemd or sys** whatever? The wiki

Re: View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-15 Thread Charlie
On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:38:18 -1000 Joel Roth sent: On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 06:08:49PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: Charlie writes: Though I'm not a programmer and really know very little about Debian [as someone once said - the lifetime learning experience] imagine the installer could

View on UNIX purism in Linux Community

2014-09-14 Thread Bartosz Olender
I am probably one of the few people (at least from what I can see by following this topic) on this mailing list, that don't mind systemd and see that the benefits of switching to it outclass the negatives. Therefore I want to poke my three cents into this discussion reminding that GNU is *Not*