PCI related stuff
I was wondering if anybody had experience with that chipset and xfree86 3.2
thanks
---
Corey A.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e
I'm trying to get the Chooser to work with XDM, so I can select what
machine I want to use. (In other words, I want to use my own machine as an
X-Terminal.)
I've managed to get the chooser to select a couple of machines (including
my own), but whenever I try to select one of them I end up with
From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Has anyone else noticed that, since the upgrade to 3.2, X seems to be
slower ?
...
After the upgrade I noticed that my WM (AfterStep) took about 2-3 seconds
more
to load and the window drawing is also a bit slower. I didn't think
On Thu, 6 Mar 1997, Daniel S. Barclay wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that, since the upgrade to 3.2, X seems to be
slower ?
I've noticed one area where X is now slower. I run 2 X displays, one at 256
colors, the other at 16bpp. I switch between then a lot. It used to be a
very fast
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone else noticed that, since the upgrade to 3.2, X seems to
be slower ?
[stuff deleted]
Has anoyone had a similar experience ?
I noticed that my Cirrus Logic 5426-VLB is slower in redrawing the
screen and dragging
On Fri, 7 Mar 1997, Paul Seelig wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone else noticed that, since the upgrade to 3.2, X seems to
be slower ?
[stuff deleted]
Has anoyone had a similar experience ?
I noticed that my Cirrus Logic
Hi!
Has anyone else noticed that, since the upgrade to 3.2, X seems to be slower ?
I have a P120 with 48 Mb and a Stealth64 Video 2000 (S3) with 2Mb DRAM.
I use 1024x768 with 16 bpp.
After the upgrade I noticed that my WM (AfterStep) took about 2-3 seconds more
to load and the window drawing is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Has anyone else noticed that, since the upgrade to 3.2, X seems to be slower ?
I have a P120 with 48 Mb and a Stealth64 Video 2000 (S3) with 2Mb DRAM.
I use 1024x768 with 16 bpp.
After the upgrade I noticed that my WM (AfterStep) took about 2-3 seconds more
to load and the
Hi!
Has anyone else noticed that, since the upgrade to 3.2, X seems to be slower ?
I have a P120 with 48 Mb and a Stealth64 Video 2000 (S3) with 2Mb DRAM.
I use 1024x768 with 16 bpp.
After the upgrade I noticed that my WM (AfterStep) took about 2-3 seconds more
to load and the window drawing is
On Sun, 01 Dec 1996 08:38:12 +0100 Niels ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, 30 Nov 1996, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
- There are only a few dependency problems left (for example xv depends on
something not available and won't configure because of that, IIRC); X
itself is debugged pretty OK
XFree 3.2 is in the new unstable tree: /pub/debian/bo/binary-i386/x11
I recently upgraded to 3.2 and it hasn't crashed on me yet :)
Hello,
I just want to make sure that I'm doing this right. I just downloaded
from the above site what I believe to be everything I need to
Hello,
When you installed XFree 3.2, did you experience any problems with the
xrdb utility not working? When I first tried it, xrdb would exit with a can't
run '/usr/lib/cpp -Dblablabla' with a whole bunch of '-D' switches following
the 'cpp' part. I checked out my '/usr/lib/cpp', and
Carnage == Carnage [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Carnage Hello, When you installed XFree 3.2, did you experience
Carnage any problems with the xrdb utility not working? When I
Carnage first tried it, xrdb would exit with a can't run
Carnage '/usr/lib/cpp -Dblablabla' with a whole
Hi:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Carnage == Carnage [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Carnage Hello, When you installed XFree 3.2, did you experience
Carnage any problems with the xrdb utility not working? When I
Carnage first tried it, xrdb would exit with a can't run
Carnage
Does anyone know where I can get the latest XFree86 3.2 package for
Debian?? I saw someone mentioned here a short time ago. I couldn't
find it in Debian's ftp site (www.debian.org/FTP). I need it to get my
ATI card to work.
Thanks a lot
H.C.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail
XFree 3.2 is in the new unstable tree: /pub/debian/bo/binary-i386/x11
I recently upgraded to 3.2 and it hasn't crashed on me yet :)
Graeme
--
| Graeme A Stewart, pgp public key finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| Key fingerprint = AF C7 BF A4 52 D5 3C 3B 17 A5 62 43 DA 15 E8 97 |
| Please
XFree 3.2 is in the new unstable tree: /pub/debian/bo/binary-i386/x11
I recently upgraded to 3.2 and it hasn't crashed on me yet :)
Hello,
I just want to make sure that I'm doing this right. I just downloaded
from the above site what I believe to be everything I need to upgrade
Herbert Xu writes:
Sure, the user should be able to customise things if they want to. But
if you don't have a pretty default, people will simply say that Debian
looks ugly!
First make it work. Then make it work right. Then make it work really
well. Then, if you have time and it doesn't
Has the font used by xterm changed in the new xfree 3.2 release?
I upgraded to 3.2 from bo the day before yesterday and have found that
the nice solid font which xterm used to use has been replaced by a thin,
spidery font which is only readable in Huge mode on my screen.
I have the following in
Stephen Early wrote:
One of the good things, in my opinion, about Debian is that it
provides packages that are set up sensibly with 'normal' defaults. I
don't want to start doing anything fancy just to look pretty; other
distributions have tried this, and it occasionally causes confusion
On Sat, 16 Nov 1996, Alex Romosan wrote:
xrdb doesn't seem to work on a 486 which i recently upgraded to
xfree86 3.2. when i run it i get this:
/usr/X11R6/bin/xrdb: cannot run '/lib/cpp -traditional -Dlinux
-D__i386__ -D_POS IX_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -DX_LOCALE
[etc]
from
If you want the login screen to look pretty, just grab a copy of
XBanner from http://chaos.fullerton.edu , the XBanner home page. A
Debian package is available.
--
Stephen Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux 1.1 on an Intel Pentium 150
Send
xrdb doesn't seem to work on a 486 which i recently upgraded to
xfree86 3.2. when i run it i get this:
/usr/X11R6/bin/xrdb: cannot run '/lib/cpp -traditional -Dlinux
-D__i386__ -D_POS IX_SOURCE -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -DX_LOCALE
-DHOST=rosalind -DSERVERHOST=r osalind -DSRVR_rosalind
Bill Bumgarner writes:
1) XF86Setup doesn't provide for resolutions beyond 1280x1024 [though it
does a nice job of ensuring that the server chooses the HIGHEST available
resolution].
Resolutions beyond 1280x1024 are not yet a common case. I suspect that
most people using higher resolutions
Stephen Early [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One of the good things, in my opinion, about Debian is that it
provides packages that are set up sensibly with 'normal' defaults. I
don't want to start doing anything fancy just to look pretty; other
distributions have tried this, and it occasionally
@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: XFree86 3.2 Initial Reports
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
I grabbed the XFree86 3.2 packages from master and took 'em for a test
spin; it is quite
is available in source and binary
form; among many other very cool features, it now includes a
GRAPHICAL setup utility
Paul Now i just hope that Debian-1.2 will not be released before
Paul there isn't a decent XFree86-3.2 package included. But maybe
Paul i'm asking
On Wed, 6 Nov 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
I guess it is appropriate to recommend that CD manufacturers include
the 27 XFree82 3.2 packages from unstable on their CDs along with
the 3.1 version that will be in the release. When I write the release
notes for CD manufacturers, I'll put that in.
[ Please don't Cc: me when replying to my message on a mailing list. ]
Paul Seelig:
Why is I-Connect obviously allowed to include non-free on their disk and
not e.g. InfoMagic who are selling more or less an image of the primary
Debian FTP server as well?
It's not Debian who are restricting
that Debian-1.2 will not be released before
Paul there isn't a decent XFree86-3.2 package included. But maybe
Paul i'm asking for too much...
I agree. Setting up XFree86 was by far the most difficult part of my
original Linux setup. With each new distribution I have tried using
Regarding XFree 3.2, it will be in unstable before 1.2 is released.
I guess it is appropriate to recommend that CD manufacturers include
the 27 XFree82 3.2 packages from unstable on their CDs along with
the 3.1 version that will be in the release. When I write the release
notes for CD
XFree86 3.2 will appear in the unstable distribution, and you'll be able
to install it from there.
We unfortunately could not make the release schedule for 1.2 with it
included.
Bruce
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word unsubscribe to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e
32 matches
Mail list logo
