Herbert Xu writes:
> Sure, the user should be able to customise things if they want to. But
> if you don't have a pretty default, people will simply say that Debian
> looks ugly!
First make it work. Then make it work right. Then make it work really
well. Then, if you have time and it doesn't br
If you want the login screen to look pretty, just grab a copy of
XBanner from http://chaos.fullerton.edu , the XBanner home page. A
Debian package is available.
--
Stephen Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux 1.1 on an Intel Pentium 150
Send a
Stephen Early wrote:
>
> One of the good things, in my opinion, about Debian is that it
> provides packages that are set up sensibly with 'normal' defaults. I
> don't want to start doing anything fancy just to look pretty; other
> distributions have tried this, and it occasionally causes confusion
Stephen Early <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One of the good things, in my opinion, about Debian is that it
> provides packages that are set up sensibly with 'normal' defaults. I
> don't want to start doing anything fancy just to look pretty; other
> distributions have tried this, and it occasional
Bill Bumgarner writes:
> 1) XF86Setup doesn't provide for resolutions beyond 1280x1024 [though it
> does a nice job of ensuring that the server chooses the HIGHEST available
> resolution].
Resolutions beyond 1280x1024 are not yet a common case. I suspect that
most people using higher resolution
MAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: XFree86 3.2 Initial Reports
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Bill Bumgarner wrote:
> I grabbed the XFree86 3.2 packages from mas
6 matches
Mail list logo
