> printing images is so *20th* century.
^
2D
-- Stefan
ard enough.
>
> Aha! Thanks for the suggestion! I've been looking for years for a
> replacement for xv myself. I've been playing with each of the things
> suggested here, but with no joy. Finally, I think sxiv looks like a
> winner! :-)
I've been using mupdf recently as
On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 1:23 PM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i wrote:
> > > halve_jpeg.c
>
> Dan Hitt wrote:
> > It was unwilling to deal with a non-color image that i had ("Unsuitable
> JPEG
> > format with 1 components per pixel"), [...]
> > if i need to deal with non-color images, i can try
Hi,
i wrote:
> > halve_jpeg.c
Dan Hitt wrote:
> It was unwilling to deal with a non-color image that i had ("Unsuitable JPEG
> format with 1 components per pixel"), [...]
> if i need to deal with non-color images, i can try to modify it.
It is much ad-hoc work, i have to confess. The images whic
Brian wrote:
>On Sat 22 May 2021 at 18:52:18 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>> I have no idea about xv specifically, but you might consider qiv, which
>> is in Debian. It's lightweight (87K for the binary, 204K by my count for
>> the package), I've never had difficulty
On Sat 22 May 2021 at 18:52:18 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> I have no idea about xv specifically, but you might consider qiv, which
> is in Debian. It's lightweight (87K for the binary, 204K by my count for
> the package), I've never had difficulty with its command-line inter
ings
> the runtime as dependency.
> The tools for compilation get installed by meta-package "build-essential".
>
> Compile the program by
>
> cc -g -Wall -o halve_jpeg halve_jpeg.c -ljpeg
>
> Test by converting some file
>
> ./halve_jpeg -geometry 1280x
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 11:50:57AM -0700, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
I have to fall back to another viewer (usually ristretto, which I
really don't like) to view these files. (Working on a file that
xv likes with the Gimp is one good way to make a file it doesn't
like.)
I used xv, a lon
program by
cc -g -Wall -o halve_jpeg halve_jpeg.c -ljpeg
Test by converting some file
./halve_jpeg -geometry 1280x1024 large_input_pic.jpg ermerging_small_pic.jpg
xv ermerging_small_pic.jpg
The -geometry argument defines a frame into which ermerging_small_pic.jpg
will fit while ret
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 2:33 PM Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> > : Unsupported JPEG process: SOF type 0xc2
>
> My xv reports this on Progressive JPEG images like
> http://www.reasoft.com/tutorials/web/img/progress.jpg
>
> My xv binary ste
On 2021-05-22 6:52 p.m., The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-05-22 at 14:50, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>
>> On Fri May 21 16:08:33 2021 Rich wrote:
>>
>> > There are five binaries that get installed in Slackware for the
>> > xv package:
>> > usr/bin/xvp
On 2021-05-22 at 14:50, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On Fri May 21 16:08:33 2021 Rich wrote:
>
> > There are five binaries that get installed in Slackware for the
> > xv package:
> > usr/bin/xvpictoppm
> > usr/bin/xv
> > usr/bin/vdcomp
> > usr/bin/bg
Hi,
Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> : Unsupported JPEG process: SOF type 0xc2
My xv reports this on Progressive JPEG images like
http://www.reasoft.com/tutorials/web/img/progress.jpg
My xv binary stems from source xv-3.10a.tar.gz of june 2000.
Its Makefile indicates that it gets linked statically w
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 12:09 PM Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On Fri May 21 16:08:33 2021 Rich wrote:
>
> > There are five binaries that get installed in Slackware for the
> > xv package:
> > usr/bin/xvpictoppm
> > usr/bin/xv
> > usr/bin/vdcomp
> > usr/
On Fri May 21 16:08:33 2021 Rich wrote:
> There are five binaries that get installed in Slackware for the
> xv package:
> usr/bin/xvpictoppm
> usr/bin/xv
> usr/bin/vdcomp
> usr/bin/bggen
> usr/bin/xcmap
>
> and there are zero libraries installed. So if you do get
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:51:43PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Thu, 03 May 2012 17:43:47 -0400, Edward wrote in message
> <4fa2fc13.3090...@comcast.net>:
>
> > Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> >
> > > ..really??? _The_ xv icon? 8o) Please post the output
>
On Thu, 03 May 2012 17:43:47 -0400, Edward wrote in message
<4fa2fc13.3090...@comcast.net>:
> Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> > ..really??? _The_ xv icon? 8o) Please post the output
> > of "dpkg -S /usr/share/icons/mono/scalable/apps/xv.svgz".
>
> dpk
On 04/05/12 03:25, Edward C. Jones wrote:
> I use up-to-date debian testing (wheezy), amd64 version, with kde.
>
> I have just compiled and installed the old image viewer "xv". In
> stable (squeeze), there is an icon for xv that can be put on the
> panel. For testing (
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..really??? _The_ xv icon? 8o) Please post the output
of "dpkg -S /usr/share/icons/mono/scalable/apps/xv.svgz".
dpkg -S /usr/share/icons/mono/scalable/apps/xv.svgz
kde-icons-mono: /usr/share/icons/mono/scalable/apps/xv.svgz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:19:51PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> ..really??? _The_ xv icon? 8o) Please post the output
> of "dpkg -S /usr/share/icons/mono/scalable/apps/xv.svgz".
>
He probably chose some icon that struck him as "images" looking
a
On Thu, 03 May 2012 13:25:42 -0400, Edward wrote in message
<4fa2bf96.2090...@comcast.net>:
> I use up-to-date debian testing (wheezy), amd64 version, with kde.
>
> I have just compiled and installed the old image viewer "xv". In
> stable (squeeze), there is an ic
I use up-to-date debian testing (wheezy), amd64 version, with kde.
I have just compiled and installed the old image viewer "xv". In stable
(squeeze), there is an icon for xv that can be put on the panel. For
testing (wheezy), the system could not find an xv icon, so I installed a
Tisztelt Hölgyem / Uram!
Cégünk a Balla Ingatlaniroda ingatlanok közvetítésével foglalkozik kizárólag
Budapest IX., X., XIV., XV., XVIII., XIX. és XX. kerületében, már kilenc éve és
már összesen 6 irodánkkal állunk Ügyfeleink rendelkezésére.
Szolgáltatásunk vevőknek TELJESEN INGYENES.
Eladók
ockmore/news/20061119T233918Z.html
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xearth/news/20060610T210838Z.html
>
> And a were it not for those examples of things that had disappeared
> from the official packages I probably would have been less quick
> to jump to conclusions about xv ;)
xlo
ion:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xlockmore/news/20061119T233918Z.html
http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xearth/news/20060610T210838Z.html
And a were it not for those examples of things that had disappeared
from the official packages I probably would have been less quick
to j
Folks-
I'm still struggling with a problem using the built-in Intel 945G graphics
in my new ThinkCentre desktop. The symptom is that applications that use
the xv driver to display video work exactly once per X session -
subsequent times, they revert to a color-map of about 16 color
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Have you tried compiling from source?
not needed, we have it for a long time already in our repository
http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org/
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.pa
from source?
http://www.trilon.com/xv/
http://www.trilon.com/xv/xv.html
http://www.trilon.com/xv/downloads.html
ftp://ftp.cis.upenn.edu/pub/xv/xv-3.10a.tar.gz
http://www.trilon.com/xv/downloads.html#patches
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For exampl
Hey guys, I know that SV is shareware and like to get for debian 3.1 ppc, does
anyone know where I can get?
I have tried to google it, but most of the sites are down, or are i386.
Thanks,
Payne
--
Magi Design and Support(http://www.magidesign.com)
Softmeta (http://www.softmeta.com)
British Sci-
shell wrote:
gustavo halperin 写道:
Hello
I have, apparently, xv support for my trident driver (CyberBlade
XP4m32). But when I run "mplayer -vo xv " or "xine -V xv
" I hear the movie but I see a blue screen. With "x11" driver
every think is OK but a little slow.
gustavo halperin 写道:
Hello
I have, apparently, xv support for my trident driver (CyberBlade
XP4m32). But when I run "mplayer -vo xv " or "xine -V xv
" I hear the movie but I see a blue screen. With "x11" driver
every think is OK but a little slow. What is t
Hello
I have, apparently, xv support for my trident driver (CyberBlade
XP4m32). But when I run "mplayer -vo xv " or "xine -V xv
" I hear the movie but I see a blue screen. With "x11" driver
every think is OK but a little slow. What is the problem? I need to
Hi,
when playing any video with kaffeine 0.8.1 (KDE 3.5.3, Xorg 7.0.22,
xserver-xorg-video-i810 1.5.1.0-2, Debian/testing) with i915GM video card
(Dell Inspiron 2200), I have totally sc.ewed up colors with Xv driver (or
auto, which probably uses the same) -- it looks like scientific images with
"David E. Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:12:28 -0800:
> On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:49:18 +1100 (EST)
> Tim Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > G'day all,
> >
> > I have an Dull Inspiron 4000, which always used to have wo
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:49:18 +1100 (EST)
Tim Connors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> G'day all,
>
> I have an Dull Inspiron 4000, which always used to have working DRI and XV
> under kernel 2.4 and XFree86 4.x. The video card is a Rage 128:
>
snipping some of this - a
G'day all,
I have an Dull Inspiron 4000, which always used to have working DRI and XV
under kernel 2.4 and XFree86 4.x. The video card is a Rage 128:
> lspci -vvv
...
:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage
Mobility M3 AGP 2x (rev 02) (prog-if
On Sunday 30 October 2005 11:20 am, William Ballard wrote:
> Does XV work on Nvidia with Sid's Xorg, using Nvidia's propitary
> drivers?
Yes it does. As far as I know, there's no extra configuration required.
--
I use digital signatures and encryption. My key is stored at p
Does XV work on Nvidia with Sid's Xorg, using Nvidia's propitary drivers?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 11 August 2005 19:14, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>Rick Pasotto wrote:
>> My onboard video has the KM400 chipset which is supposed to be
>> driven by the 'via' driver in XFree86. According to the man page
>> this driver supports Xv video overlay extension
Rick Pasotto wrote:
My onboard video has the KM400 chipset which is supposed to be driven by
the 'via' driver in XFree86. According to the man page this driver
supports Xv video overlay extensions. My logfile shows that the Xvideo
extentions are loaded. However, xvinfo reports n
My onboard video has the KM400 chipset which is supposed to be driven by
the 'via' driver in XFree86. According to the man page this driver
supports Xv video overlay extensions. My logfile shows that the Xvideo
extentions are loaded. However, xvinfo reports no adaptors present and
xine-
worry about xv :-)
Does qiv have a function like xv's -maxpect? I really miss this in other
programs. I'd be happy with ImageMagick's display if it had a -maxpect.
Here's its package description:
A quick image viewer for X
Quick Image Viewer (qiv) is a very small
gt; > > Just apt-get it and you will, probably, never worry about xv :-)
> >
> > Does qiv have a function like xv's -maxpect? I really miss this in other
> > programs. I'd be happy with ImageMagick's display if it had a -maxpect.
>
> qiv -fm, or press
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 02:09:46PM -0500, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:39:48AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
>
> > I personally would recommend qiv. A wonderful tool for viewing images.
> > Just apt-get it and you will, probably, never worry about xv :-)
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 14:09:46 -0500, Mason Loring Bliss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:39:48AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
>
> > I personally would recommend qiv. A wonderful tool for viewing images.
> > Just apt-get it and you will, probab
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:39:48AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> I personally would recommend qiv. A wonderful tool for viewing images.
> Just apt-get it and you will, probably, never worry about xv :-)
Does qiv have a function like xv's -maxpect? I really miss this in other
progr
piece of shareware that allows you to "use pieces
of it in new free programs". None. Not one. I'll stick by me original
statement that shareware is not Free software in general, and explicitly not
so in the case of xv.
> No doubt you know more than RMS does.
OK, Marc, I'
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 09:12:29PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> There's no way that xv is GPL, much less DSFG-free.
I never claimed that it was either one. In fact, I pointed out that it was
NOT DFSG-free, and why it was not. The xv license restricts distribution
and use. It's as s
these things.
>
> And, of course, the entire contents of
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html
>
> No doubt you know more than RMS does.
http://www.trilon.com/xv/pricing.html
"xv is shareware for personal use only."
"Commercial, government, and institutional us
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 09:44:39AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> On Friday 17 December 2004 10:22 pm, Marc Wilson wrote:
>
> > The fact that it's shareware has nothing to do with it.
>
> Yes, it does. That means (by definition) that it's under a non-Free license,
Funny, I seem to recall the GPL
On Friday 17 December 2004 10:22 pm, Marc Wilson wrote:
> The fact that it's shareware has nothing to do with it.
Yes, it does. That means (by definition) that it's under a non-Free license,
and therefore not eligible for distribution in Debian/main, and that most
Debian users and maintainers
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:53:10PM -0600, Bart Dorsey wrote:
> If you have a 3d accelerated video card, gliv is pretty nice uses
> opengl to scale and display the image... and the scroll wheel on a
> mouse zooms in and out.
Interesting... but xv is *much* faster. I *do* like the
mo
te:
> >
> > > I have a simple question:
> > > Why xv is not any more supported by Debian?
> >
> > I have a simple answer:
> > Because it's shareware. See http://www.trilon.com/xv/pricing.html for
> > details.
>
> The fact that it's sh
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:29:39AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> On Friday 17 December 2004 11:15, Ivan Glushkov wrote:
>
> > I have a simple question:
> > Why xv is not any more supported by Debian?
>
> I have a simple answer:
> Because it's shareware. See http:
I will be out of the office starting Monday, December 20 and will
return on Tuesday, January 4. I will not be checking email regularly
during this time.
Have a great holiday break!
--
Brandon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 08:20:40PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:39:48AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> > I personally would recommend qiv. A wonderful tool for viewing images.
> > Just apt-get it and you will, probably, never worry about xv :
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:39:48AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> I personally would recommend qiv. A wonderful tool for viewing images.
> Just apt-get it and you will, probably, never worry about xv :-)
I second this. There is also "display" from imagemagick. qiv loads
more quic
I will be out of the office starting Monday, December 20 and will
return on Tuesday, January 4. I will not be checking email regularly
during this time.
Have a great holiday break!
--
Brandon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 12:35:01PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:29:39AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> > On Friday 17 December 2004 11:15, Ivan Glushkov wrote:
> >
> > > I have a simple question:
> > > Why xv is
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 06:15:46PM +0100, Ivan Glushkov wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have a simple question:
> Why xv is not any more supported by Debian?
>
> I mean, I googled for that, I saw some previous discussion about that, I
> found even a package on:
>
> http:
ugh
> > the normal Debian channels.
>
> They are not functionally *identical*. For example, if I view a picture
> with 'display' and resize it, 'display' asks if I want to save it. 'Xv'
> realized that the resizing was for viewing purposes only. Very ann
Hello Ivan, hello list!
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 06:15:46PM +0100, Ivan Glushkov wrote:
> I have a simple question:
> Why xv is not any more supported by Debian?
See
<http://bugs.debian.org/98215>
HTH,
Flo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:29:39AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> On Friday 17 December 2004 11:15, Ivan Glushkov wrote:
>
> > I have a simple question:
> > Why xv is not any more supported by Debian?
>
> I have a simple answer:
> Because it's shareware. See http:
On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 18:15 +0100, Ivan Glushkov wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have a simple question:
> Why xv is not any more supported by Debian?
>
> I mean, I googled for that, I saw some previous discussion about that, I
> found even a package on:
>
> http://ftp.irb.h
On Friday 17 December 2004 11:15, Ivan Glushkov wrote:
> I have a simple question:
> Why xv is not any more supported by Debian?
I have a simple answer:
Because it's shareware. See http://www.trilon.com/xv/pricing.html for
details.
Basically, there are any number of functionalit
Hi list,
I have a simple question:
Why xv is not any more supported by Debian?
I mean, I googled for that, I saw some previous discussion about that, I
found even a package on:
http://ftp.irb.hr/debian-archive/dists/hamm/non-free/binary-i386/graphics/xv_3.10a-16.deb
, but of course it is not
On 16.9.2004 6:08 JSS wrote:
After a recent upgrade of debian/unstable my mplayer (1.0pre5) has
stopped showing any video.
I found out that xv output is not working (which was working without any
problem before the upgrade).
I tried to localize the problem and found that following libs have
After a recent upgrade of debian/unstable my mplayer (1.0pre5) has
stopped showing any video.
I found out that xv output is not working (which was working without any
problem before the upgrade).
I tried to localize the problem and found that following libs have been
upgraded (earlier version
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004 the mental interface of
Marc Wilson told:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 03:49:31PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > I have built mutt-1.5.6i and xv with an pdf-plugin for testing/unstable.
> > You need the following entries in /etc/apt/sources:
>
> Not t
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 03:49:31PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> I have built mutt-1.5.6i and xv with an pdf-plugin for testing/unstable.
> You need the following entries in /etc/apt/sources:
Not to knock your building xv w/ PDF support (it's useful), but the license
prohibits d
Hi list,
I have built mutt-1.5.6i and xv with an pdf-plugin for testing/unstable.
You need the following entries in /etc/apt/sources:
deb http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv binary-i386/
deb-src http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv sources/
and for ppc-users:
deb http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv binary
On Wednesday 31 Mar 2004 20:43, Kenneth Macdoald Karlsen wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 21:14, Tom Chance wrote:
> > Can anybody confirm whether or not they have the XVideo extension working
> > in a recently updated Debian unstable. You can find out by running
> > "xdpyinfo" and grepping for XVIDE
t;extmod"
# Load"freetype"
Load"glx"
Load"int10"
Load"record"
Load"speedo"
Load"type1"
Load"vbe"
EndSection
Kenneth.
>
> On Tues
f Debian sid (unstable) with Xfree 4.3.0.1, an nvidia
> card and the latest builds of mplayer and xine. Neither can use the "xv"
> extension. When I try, I get the following errors:
>
> With mplayer:
>
> Xlib: extension "XFree86-VidModeExtension" missing on displ
; It's not too quick, but it's a heck of a lot quicker than default :)
> >
> > I have a feeling that I read somwhwere in the mplayer docs that the
> > above is the only thing that works on nvidia, even with the closed
> > source driver. I could be wrong...
>
>
;
> I have a feeling that I read somwhwere in the mplayer docs that the
> above is the only thing that works on nvidia, even with the closed
> source driver. I could be wrong...
You are, at least partly:
for me xv works, at least mostly, on my gf4ti4200 with the closed source
driver (1.0.44
table) with Xfree 4.3.0.1, an
> > > nvidia card and the latest builds of mplayer and xine. Neither can use
> > > the "xv" extension. When I try, I get the following errors:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > Xlib: extension "SHAPE" missin
On Tuesday 30 Mar 2004 13:49, Albert Dengg wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 12:22:33PM +0100, Tom Chance wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've got an install of Debian sid (unstable) with Xfree 4.3.0.1, an
> > nvidia card and the latest builds of mplayer and xine. Neithe
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 12:22:33PM +0100, Tom Chance wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got an install of Debian sid (unstable) with Xfree 4.3.0.1, an nvidia
> card and the latest builds of mplayer and xine. Neither can use the "xv"
> extension. When I try, I get th
Hello,
I've got an install of Debian sid (unstable) with Xfree 4.3.0.1, an nvidia
card and the latest builds of mplayer and xine. Neither can use the "xv"
extension. When I try, I get the following errors:
With mplayer:
Xlib: extension "XFree86-VidModeExtension" miss
.
I just diddled it again tonight after realizing the reason I couldn't make
grabbing work was that xv has the old modifier+mouse issue going, and I
have numlock on. ^_^
There are some nice unofficial patches out there for it too, if you know
where to look.
--
Marc Wilson | Success is getting
Marc Wilson wrote:
> H. S. wrote:
> > and I am trying to compile xv(xv-3.10a) and get this error:
> I assume you're trying to build it from the sources on Bradley's web site.
> That works, sort-of, but you can get Debian sources from here:
> [...]
> ... and you&
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 10:46:28PM -0500, H. S. wrote:
> and I am trying to compile xv(xv-3.10a) and get this error:
>
> #-
I don't think I've seen that one, and I've been building xv locally for
some time now. ^_^
I assume you'r
Hi, I am running Woody (ustable perhaps; I am new to Debiain so not sure
hoe to specify this, but I dist-upgraded from Woddy):
~# uname -a
Linux bijli 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i686 GNU/Linux
and I am trying to compile xv(xv-3.10a) and get this error
On Monday 06 October 2003 16:08, Ogulla, Alphonse wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicos Gollan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 October 2003 13:17
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Xv video driver expires after xfree86 upgrade
>
> On Monday 06 October
On Monday 06 October 2003 18:18, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Is it a laptop? I had a problem with my laptop where if the X server
> was started while I had video output going to an external monitor Xv
> playback would bluescreen. If I started the X server with video to the
> builtin L
while I had video output going to an external monitor Xv
playback would bluescreen. If I started the X server with video to the
builtin LCD it worked fine (even if I later plugged in the external
monitor and redirected the video output).
HTH,
-Roberto
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> On Monday 06 October 2003 11:21, Alphonse Ogulla wrote:
> > Up to very recently, I could watch vcd movies on my box using xine video
> > player with Xv as the video driver. However, I came to discover yesterday
> > that Xv video driver had become inoperative after either
On Monday 06 October 2003 11:21, Alphonse Ogulla wrote:
> Up to very recently, I could watch vcd movies on my box using xine video
> player with Xv as the video driver. However, I came to discover yesterday
> that Xv video driver had become inoperative after either upgrading xfree86
>
Hi all,
Up to very recently, I could watch vcd movies on my box using xine video
player with Xv as the video driver. However, I came to discover yesterday
that Xv video driver had become inoperative after either upgrading xfree86
from version 4.1.0 to 4.2.1 using the deb package or installation
On 01 Aug 2003 22:34:54 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> xv is also listed at apt-get.org.
I "registered" it a few years ago, when I was using RH, and I like
"seeing" my name when I start it up ;-)
I did find mt "problem". Being tired,
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 19:43:28 -0700
Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:38:44PM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> > Has anyone gotten xv-3.10a to compile successfully under debian,
> > with all patches applied?
>
> Of course.
>
>
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 10:34:54PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> xv is also listed at apt-get.org.
Yeah, that's where I found the original source archive of 3.10a-26 that I
have.
> Marc, maybe you could list your xv w/ apt-get.org...
Uh, no. I'm not about to get into *suppo
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 21:43, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:38:44PM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> > Has anyone gotten xv-3.10a to compile successfully under debian, with
> > all patches applied?
>
> Of course.
>
> > I'm having trouble gettin
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:38:44PM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> Has anyone gotten xv-3.10a to compile successfully under debian, with
> all patches applied?
Of course.
> I'm having trouble getting PNG support compiled in.
Why? All the necessary patches are on the web site.
Has anyone gotten xv-3.10a to compile successfully under debian, with
all patches applied?
I'm having trouble getting PNG support compiled in.
Everything compiles okay, but I cannot find where to "add" the zlib &
libpng path(s) to the "Makefile" to get them linked, s
On ons, 2003-07-09 at 15:48, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> --- Jakob Sandholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> > Hello
> >
> > I have a Matrox Millennium G200 graphics card. When I use the XV
> > extension, videos render scrambled. This does not happen with XSHM
--- Jakob Sandholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Hello
>
> I have a Matrox Millennium G200 graphics card. When I use the XV
> extension, videos render scrambled. This does not happen with XSHM (but
> XSHM is too slow). Does anybody know what the problem is?
>
Hello
I have a Matrox Millennium G200 graphics card. When I use the XV
extension, videos render scrambled. This does not happen with XSHM (but
XSHM is too slow). Does anybody know what the problem is?
As a solution, I tried installing 'mga-vid-source', I extracted it to
/usr/src/module
All I get when I try to use xv output is a blue screen (I have tried the same
file in mplayer, xine, and ogle). XFree86 loads the xv extension on boot,
all the different utils say that its there and that it is supported, but I
always get the blue screen
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
