On Mon 19 Oct 2020 at 09:37:01 (+0200), Sven Hartge wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 05:40:04PM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
> >> Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> >>>> Does anyone have Zoom working in Debian 10?
>
> >>>
, though:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labor_rights#International_Labor_Organization_%28ILO%29
I understand that you have the right to have your union protest against
Zoom, but not the right to refuse using it for fulfilling your work duties.
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 05:40:04PM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>>> Does anyone have Zoom working in Debian 10?
>>> Don't know, but I use and recommend Jitsi as a Free Software
>>> alternative.
>>
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 05:40:04PM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> >> Does anyone have Zoom working in Debian 10?
>
> > Don't know, but I use and recommend Jitsi as a Free Software
> > alternative.
>
> If The Powers
Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Does anyone have Zoom working in Debian 10?
> Don't know, but I use and recommend Jitsi as a Free Software
> alternative.
If The Powers That Be[tm] have decided to use Zoom, then it is
irrelevant that there might be a better (Open Source) alternative.
> Does anyone have Zoom working in Debian 10?
Don't know, but I use and recommend Jitsi as a Free Software alternative.
Stefan
On 10/17/20 17:47, David wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 at 08:03, wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have Zoom working in Debian 10?
>
> Yes. I downloaded
> zoom_amd64-5.0.413237.0524.deb
> from here
> https://zoom.us/download?os=linux
> and installed it using apt (to pr
On 10/18/20 5:23 AM, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> Does anyone have Zoom working in Debian 10?
>
> Here it produces empty windows. Visible toward the right in this
> screenshot. http://easthope.ca/Zoom.png
>
> This is the entire output after starting in a terminal a
On 10/17/20, David wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 at 08:03, wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have Zoom working in Debian 10?
>
> Yes. I downloaded
> zoom_amd64-5.0.413237.0524.deb
> from here
> https://zoom.us/download?os=linux
> and installed it using apt (to provide d
On 10/17/20 1:23 PM, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
Does anyone have Zoom working in Debian 10?
Here it produces empty windows. Visible toward the right in this
screenshot. http://easthope.ca/Zoom.png
This is the entire output after starting in a terminal and then
exiting.
peter@joule:~$ zoom
On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 at 08:03, wrote:
> Does anyone have Zoom working in Debian 10?
Yes. I downloaded
zoom_amd64-5.0.413237.0524.deb
from here
https://zoom.us/download?os=linux
and installed it using apt (to provide dependencies).
Because zoom is not trusted software, I
Carl Fink writes:
> On 10/17/20 4:23 PM, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> > Does anyone have Zoom working in Debian 10?
>
> Working fine here. Did you set up the Microsoft repo?
>
Working fine with my wife's Buster; used extensively for months,
(daily,) with no problems.
Installed f
On 10/17/20 4:23 PM, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
Does anyone have Zoom working in Debian 10?
Working fine here. Did you set up the Microsoft repo?
--
Carl Fink nitpick...@nitpicking.com
Read my blog at blog.nitpicking.com. Reviews! Observations!
I have zoom on a couple Debian 10 machines. Both are Mate desktop
Both work as expected.
this one opens the zoom window using $ zoom in a terminal
and by using the Mate launcher (/usr/bin/zoom %U)
On 10/17/20 1:23 PM, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
Does anyone have Zoom working in Debian 10?
Here
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 13:23:02 -0700
pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> Does anyone have Zoom working in Debian 10?
Yes.
Linux Client Version is 5.0.418682.0603
(You may have to go to the notification tray and shut it down from there.)
--
charles@jhega
Does anyone have Zoom working in Debian 10?
Here it produces empty windows. Visible toward the right in this
screenshot. http://easthope.ca/Zoom.png
This is the entire output after starting in a terminal and then
exiting.
peter@joule:~$ zoom
peter@joule:~$
Thx
Impresionante!
Era cierto, ZOOM se instala como APP en la configuracion de PROTECTOR DE
PANTALLAS.
y tal cual como en el link que me pasaste habia revisado en casi todos lados,
menos en el lanzador de protector de pantallas.
Muchas Gracias!!
El jueves, 1 de octubre de 2020 19:59:15 ART
El jue., 1 oct. 2020 a las 12:27, Camaleón () escribió:
> El 2020-09-27 a las 12:46 +, Ricardo Delgado escribió:
>
> > uso debian stable con XFCE4, desde que instale ZOOM en mi notebook; me
> doy con lo siguiente.
> >
> > Sin abrir la APP y sin dejar en el SYSTRA
El 2020-09-27 a las 12:46 +, Ricardo Delgado escribió:
> uso debian stable con XFCE4, desde que instale ZOOM en mi notebook; me doy
> con lo siguiente.
>
> Sin abrir la APP y sin dejar en el SYSTRAY, es decir solo lanzo ZOOM cuando
> lo necesito, accediendo desde el menu.
Buenos dias, les hago una consulta.
uso debian stable con XFCE4, desde que instale ZOOM en mi notebook; me doy con
lo siguiente.
Sin abrir la APP y sin dejar en el SYSTRAY, es decir solo lanzo ZOOM cuando lo
necesito, accediendo desde el menu.
Pues bien, si dejo la notebook encendida un buen
On 7/18/20 4:52 PM, Bob Weber wrote:
On 7/18/20 6:46 PM, Gary L. Roach wrote:
Installed Alsa, asound
OS Debian 10
Hi all,
I have standard alsa sound installed in my system and it works fine
for most things. Recently I started using Zoom, have installed a
Logitech C920 webcam with stereo
Installed Alsa, asound
OS Debian 10
Hi all,
I have standard alsa sound installed in my system and it works fine for
most things. Recently I started using Zoom, have installed a Logitech
C920 webcam with stereo microphones and a Sennheiser HD4.50BTNC
headphones with stereo microphones. I now
On Thursday, June 25, 2020 10:14:50 AM rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> Can you give me any clues about how you told it which audio device to use
> (and which you told it to use)?
Ahh, I found the settings screen and switched the audio (to "Built In Analog
Audio Stereo") and tested it -- it works.
On Thursday, June 25, 2020 09:25:06 AM David wrote:
> Hi, are you aware that Zoom has available a Linux-compatible
> desktop client application that runs without a browser?
Thanks, yes, that is one of the ways I tried to join the zoom meeting on my
Jessie system -- the client says it re
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 09:28:21AM -0700, Peter Ehlert wrote:
> Family is using Zoom, International.
> They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
>
> I use Debian Mate Stable, and Firefox ESR
>
> I am concerned about security, duh!
> Looking for ideas.
>
> my
[ It comes back to Jitsi and its license after a few paragraphs. And it
is appalling. ]
The Wanderer (12020-06-10):
> What's with the stray 1, here?
We are in 12020 HE = 2020 CE, HE stands for Holocene Era, or possibly
Human Era, it is just shifted by 1 from the Common Era. As a
consequence,
iciels libres.
https://www.april.org/
Frédéric ZULIAN
Le jeu. 11 juin 2020 à 01:24, Gaëtan Perrier a
écrit :
> Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 17:33 +0200, Frederic Zulian a écrit :
> >
> > Il y a toujours la possibilité d'utiliser Zoom en ligne sans l'installer.
>
> Ah bon ?
>
>
Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 15:17 +, Simeone Dominique a écrit :
> Bonjour,
>
> j'essaye de télécharger zoom mais mon système qui a évolué vers Sid et
> Bullseye dit unsopported
>
>
Bizarre je l'ai installé y a moins d'un moins sur testing avec le deb pour
debian 8.0+
Le mardi 09 juin 2020 à 17:33 +0200, Frederic Zulian a écrit :
>
> Il y a toujours la possibilité d'utiliser Zoom en ligne sans l'installer.
Ah bon ?
Quand j'ai voulu m'en servir il me redirigeait systématiquement vers la page de
téléchargement de l'appli.
Gaëtan
signature.asc
Descr
On 2020-06-10 at 09:27, Nicolas George wrote:
> The Wanderer (12020-06-09):
What's with the stray 1, here?
>> I subscribe to probably dozens of mailing lists, and I don't know
>> of any way to configure things to add that header with a proper
>> value automatically on a per-mailing-list basis.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 8:17 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> Michael Stone (12020-06-10):
> > Properly configured mailing list software does no such thing, since it's
> a
> > misuse of the reply-to header.
>
> A misuse that works, compared to non-misuses that regularly bring back
> "don't cc me"
The Wanderer (12020-06-09):
> I subscribe to probably dozens of mailing lists, and I don't know of any
> way to configure things to add that header with a proper value
> automatically on a per-mailing-list basis. Otherwise, I'd probably have
> done this years ago, unless other considerations
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 03:17:34PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
Michael Stone (12020-06-10):
Properly configured mailing list software does no such thing, since it's a
misuse of the reply-to header.
A misuse that works,
Except for the things that it breaks, and the cases for which it
Michael Stone (12020-06-10):
> Properly configured mailing list software does no such thing, since it's a
> misuse of the reply-to header.
A misuse that works, compared to non-misuses that regularly bring back
"don't cc me" subthreads. At some points, the religion of "properly"
using headers need
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 12:51:00PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
Instead of writing this periodically, you could include:
Reply-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
in your headers just like I did. Properly configured mailing-list
software does it by default for subscribed users, but Debian is an
Original post: family is using Zoom.
No alternative for me to participate... Zoom or nothing.
Thanks for the suggestion.
Peter Ehlert
On June 9, 2020 10:56:10 AM Alberto Sentieri <2...@tripolho.com> wrote:
This is a long thread. I did not read it all. Did anyone suggest
http://meet.google.com?
This is a long thread. I did not read it all. Did anyone suggest
http://meet.google.com?
Le mar. 9 juin 2020 à 17:33, Frederic Zulian a écrit :
>
>
>
> Cela me semble un peu hérétique d'installer une appli Microsoft dans
> une Debian.
>
Je ne crois pas que Zoom appartienne a Microsoft mais sur le principe tu as
raison.
Par contre une utilisation dans le
Il y a toujours la possibilité d'utiliser Zoom en ligne sans l'installer.
C'est le choix que j'ai fait et cela fonctionne sans problème avec Firefox.
Cela me semble un peu hérétique d'installer une appli Microsoft dans une
Debian.
Frédéric ZULIAN
--
Pour la santé de votre ordinateur, préférez
Oui tu peux utiliser le snap
https://snapcraft.io/zoom-client
<-->
Michel Memeteau - Directeur.
<http://shop.ekimia.fr/>
Notre Boutique Ordinateurs GNU/Linux : https://sh
Bonjour,
j'essaye de télécharger zoom mais mon système qui a évolué vers Sid et Bullseye
dit unsopported
Y-a-t il un autre moyen de le télécharger?
Debian vôtre.
Mr.Dominique Simeone
On Tuesday, June 09, 2020 05:45:24 AM Nicolas George wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de (12020-06-09):
> > Can we stop that already? Nobody proved you can't build Jitsi or
> > BBB from source. Everyone here is just too friggin' lazy to even
> > try.
> >
> > Can we give 'em the benefit of the doubt until
On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 06:41:33AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> (Please stop CCing me on replies [...]
Sorry.
[...]
> FWIW, I have tried, at least in part.
Thanks for taking the time to do, and thanks for reporting back.
[...]
> Even a successful build from a repository like that would not
>
On 2020-06-09 at 06:51, Nicolas George wrote:
> The Wanderer (12020-06-09):
>
>> (Please stop CCing me on replies - especially to messages which I
>> did not actually send - unless you're specifically trying to draw
>> my attention to a particular message and think I may not notice it
>> without
The Wanderer (12020-06-09):
> (Please stop CCing me on replies - especially to messages which I did
> not actually send - unless you're specifically trying to draw my
> attention to a particular message and think I may not notice it without
> the CC. Not only am I subscribed, I am in fact reading
(Please stop CCing me on replies - especially to messages which I did
not actually send - unless you're specifically trying to draw my
attention to a particular message and think I may not notice it without
the CC. Not only am I subscribed, I am in fact reading this thread on a
to...@tuxteam.de (12020-06-09):
> Can we stop that already? Nobody proved you can't build Jitsi or
> BBB from source. Everyone here is just too friggin' lazy to even
> try.
>
> Can we give 'em the benefit of the doubt until someone really makes
> his hands ditry on that?
You can be naïve and
> as shipped in those packages.
> >>
> >> Presumably, as those packages are for download from the authors'
> >> Website, the authors are the ones who built them. Thus, this doesn't
> >> demonstrate that anyone other than the authors have been able to build
> >&
r download from the authors'
>> Website, the authors are the ones who built them. Thus, this doesn't
>> demonstrate that anyone other than the authors have been able to build
>> Jitsi.
>
> So? It is an open-source alternative to Zoom, and it works. Of
> course, if you are
On 6/8/20 12:06 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
Open Source is not enough.
I did not think it would be necessary to explain why Libre Software is
important here. It is not just a matter of possible malicious in the
code, it is a matter of being able to change it to suit our needs, to
fix it if there
David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 07 Jun 2020 at 19:30:19 (+), Russell L. Harris wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> > > to...@tuxteam.de (12020-06-07):
> > > > Yes, the server is free software. As is Jitsi's. So you can get the
> > > > source, build
On Sun 07 Jun 2020 at 19:30:19 (+), Russell L. Harris wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> > to...@tuxteam.de (12020-06-07):
> > > Yes, the server is free software. As is Jitsi's. So you can get the
> > > source, build yourself or download pre-built
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 11:17:39PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 07 Jun 2020 at 22:24:56 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 09:07:59PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Nicolas George states the obvious. All modern VoIP involves immense
> > > resources to
t that point: do you mean it's a complex programming
> task or it needs network resources (bandwidth, low latency)?
Both, but mainly the latter. And lots of organisation and money.
> > Resources cost money. Linux Central is out of funds.
>
> Who is Linux Central?
The entity that
for download from the authors'
>> Website, the authors are the ones who built them. Thus, this
>> doesn't demonstrate that anyone other than the authors have been
>> able to build Jitsi.
>
> So? It is an open-source alternative to Zoom, and it works.
The post to which you w
Russell L. Harris (12020-06-07):
> So? It is an open-source alternative to Zoom, and it works. Of
> course, if you are worried that the builders put in something
> malicious or dangerous which is not in the open source repository,
> then you can turn to Zoom, or build your own, o
, this doesn't
demonstrate that anyone other than the authors have been able to build
Jitsi.
So? It is an open-source alternative to Zoom, and it works. Of
course, if you are worried that the builders put in something
malicious or dangerous which is not in the open source repository,
then you can turn
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 09:07:59PM +0100, Brian wrote:
[...]
> Nicolas George states the obvious. All modern VoIP involves immense
> resources to deliver to users.
A bit handwawy at that point: do you mean it's a complex programming
task or it needs network resources (bandwidth, low latency)?
On Sun 07 Jun 2020 at 21:19:08 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 08:57:54PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> > to...@tuxteam.de (12020-06-07):
> > > No. But I haven't tried, so...
> >
> > Well, me neither. But if I have not tried personally, I know people who
> > have tried
On 2020-06-07 at 15:30, Russell L. Harris wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
>
>> to...@tuxteam.de (12020-06-07):
>>
>>> Yes, the server is free software. As is Jitsi's. So you can get
>>> the source, build yourself or download pre-built thingies.
>>
>> Do
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
to...@tuxteam.de (12020-06-07):
Yes, the server is free software. As is Jitsi's. So you can get the
source, build yourself or download pre-built thingies.
Do you have evidence of somebody other than the authors themselves
having
On 2020-06-07 at 15:34, Nicolas George wrote:
> Darac Marjal (12020-06-07):
>
>> That's a rather ironic thing to say on a Debian mailing list :)
>
> To the best of my knowledge, Debian is not the author of most
> packages, and yet build them from source themselves: that proves the
> packages
Darac Marjal (12020-06-07):
> That's a rather ironic thing to say on a Debian mailing list :)
To the best of my knowledge, Debian is not the author of most packages,
and yet build them from source themselves: that proves the packages are
actually Libre Software. Again to the best of my knowledge,
On 07/06/2020 20:21, Nicolas George wrote:
> Seeds Notoneofmy (12020-06-07):
>> Having said all that, the instructions to get BBB going seems solid.
>> Perhaps someone here with a bit of knowhow will do this and then put a
>> guide here? That would be very, very nice:
>>
>> Here's my
Seeds Notoneofmy (12020-06-07):
> Having said all that, the instructions to get BBB going seems solid.
> Perhaps someone here with a bit of knowhow will do this and then put a
> guide here? That would be very, very nice:
>
> Here's my contribution:
>
>
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 08:57:54PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de (12020-06-07):
> > No. But I haven't tried, so...
>
> Well, me neither. But if I have not tried personally, I know people who
> have tried and failed.
>
> If only the authors can build a software, it cannot be
than the authors themselves
having managed to build it?
The OP says:
> Family is using Zoom, International.
> They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
If he wishes to participate he uses Zoom.
Correct.
The family has meetings with Zoom, I wish to attend... so I will us
On 6/7/20 8:57 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
We have to acknowledge: there are no Libre Software solutions for
videoconferencing.
Having said all that, the instructions to get BBB going seems solid.
Perhaps someone here with a bit of knowhow will do this and then put a
guide here? That would be
, an alternative to Zoom, skype, etc. So, what is it;
putting out stuff that only they could really use. Now! that's what I
call a project.
If I were a developer, here's my system for putting stuff online
develop my code
put it on github asking for contributors, not advertising it as a
solution for any
On 6/7/20 8:37 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
Do you have evidence of somebody other than the authors themselves
having managed to build it?
This made me laugh, as I know where it's coming from; over promise,
under deliver. Of course, it works; in theory. But in practice, well,
that could take
to...@tuxteam.de (12020-06-07):
> No. But I haven't tried, so...
Well, me neither. But if I have not tried personally, I know people who
have tried and failed.
If only the authors can build a software, it cannot be considered Libre
Software, since part of the source code is missing. Open Source
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 08:37:55PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> to...@tuxteam.de (12020-06-07):
> > Yes, the server is free software. As is Jitsi's. So you can get the
> > source, build yourself or download pre-built thingies.
>
> Do you have evidence of somebody other than the authors
he authors themselves
> having managed to build it?
The OP says:
> Family is using Zoom, International.
> They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
If he wishes to participate he uses Zoom. There isn't any interworking
between it and other similar programs. Discussion about Zoom c
On Sunday, June 07, 2020 02:23:04 PM Seeds Notoneofmy wrote:
> I just looked into this, having had an issue with Zoom recently. And it
> seems it allows for installing the server locally? Am I understanding
> this right, that one can have their own BBB server and provide access to
to...@tuxteam.de (12020-06-07):
> Yes, the server is free software. As is Jitsi's. So you can get the
> source, build yourself or download pre-built thingies.
Do you have evidence of somebody other than the authors themselves
having managed to build it?
Regards,
--
Nicolas George
On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 08:23:04PM +0200, Seeds Notoneofmy wrote:
> On 6/5/20 8:57 PM, Peter Ehlert wrote:
>
> >>Look into Big Blue Button and see if you can get your family to try
> >>that instead.
> >
> >bigbluebutton is interesting. Thanks for the thought.
There's also barnard for the linux command line users sometimes needs
compiling using go.
On Sun, 7 Jun 2020, Admin4 wrote:
> Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 14:00:19
> From: Admin4
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Zoom- best practice?
> Resent-Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 18:0
On 6/5/20 8:57 PM, Peter Ehlert wrote:
Look into Big Blue Button and see if you can get your family to try
that instead.
bigbluebutton is interesting. Thanks for the thought.
Many family members use Zoom, and like me, are past seven decades.
Several of the younger set use Zoom also.
I think
On 6/5/20 7:09 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
I did not test with Chromium or Firefox or anything else.
Just tried it two days ago on Firefox. It was a disaster. No sound. And
screensharing did not work, at all.
ing CentOS X-D but Client is Debian 10 :) )
just 4 info
On 6/7/20 3:42 PM, Peter Ehlert wrote:
>
> On 6/6/20 10:00 PM, Keith bainbridge wrote:
>> On 6/6/20 3:32 am, john doe wrote:
>>> On 6/5/2020 6:28 PM, Peter Ehlert wrote:
>>>> Family is using Zoom, Interna
On 6/6/20 10:00 PM, Keith bainbridge wrote:
On 6/6/20 3:32 am, john doe wrote:
On 6/5/2020 6:28 PM, Peter Ehlert wrote:
Family is using Zoom, International.
They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
I use Debian Mate Stable, and Firefox ESR
I am concerned about security, duh!
Looking
On 6/6/20 3:32 am, john doe wrote:
On 6/5/2020 6:28 PM, Peter Ehlert wrote:
Family is using Zoom, International.
They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
I use Debian Mate Stable, and Firefox ESR
I am concerned about security, duh!
Looking for ideas.
my current thoughts, in order
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 10:49 AM wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 01:06:02PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
>
> > [...] Btw BBB is also far away from a secure platform imho.
>
> Quite possible. Still, you can choose a server run by people you
> trust. And the developers seem to be quite
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 01:06:02PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> [...] Btw BBB is also far away from a secure platform imho.
Quite possible. Still, you can choose a server run by people you
trust. And the developers seem to be quite responsive.
Cheers
-- t
signature.asc
Description:
On 6/6/20 12:13 AM, Linux-Fan wrote:
> Peter Ehlert writes:
>
>> Family is using Zoom, International.
>> They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
>>
>> I use Debian Mate Stable, and Firefox ESR
>>
>> I am concerned about security, duh!
>&
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 12:13:28AM +0200, Linux-Fan wrote:
[...]
> Hello,
>
> best practice is certainly using different software
+100
[...]
>(Big Blue Button
> has been mentioned, Jitsi works OK for small groups, say ~10
> persons, too) [...]
FWIW, it seems to
On 6/5/20 13:48, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 05 Jun 2020 at 09:28:21 -0700, Peter Ehlert wrote:
>
>> Family is using Zoom, International.
>> They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
>
> Seems straightforward. Just get on with it.
>
>> I use Debian Mate S
>> Family is using Zoom, International.
>> They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
>
>Seems straightforward. Just get on with it.
Don't. Zoom is not necessary to stay in touch with family. If you cannot get
another video conferencing provider, use a phone. But do not
Peter Ehlert writes:
Family is using Zoom, International.
They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
I use Debian Mate Stable, and Firefox ESR
I am concerned about security, duh!
Looking for ideas.
my current thoughts, in order of preference:
1. Use a separate Debian alongside my daily
On Fri 05 Jun 2020 at 09:28:21 -0700, Peter Ehlert wrote:
> Family is using Zoom, International.
> They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
Seems straightforward. Just get on with it.
> I use Debian Mate Stable, and Firefox ESR
>
> I am concerned about security, duh!
R
On 6/5/20 9:56 AM, der.hans wrote:
Am 05. Jun, 2020 schwätzte Peter Ehlert so:
Family is using Zoom, International.
They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
I use Debian Mate Stable, and Firefox ESR
I am concerned about security, duh!
Looking for ideas.
my current thoughts, in order
On 6/5/20 9:47 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:45 AM Peter Ehlert <mailto:pe...@sdi-baja.com>> wrote:
Family is using Zoom, International.
They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
I use Debian Mate Stable, and Firefox ESR
I am concer
On Fri, 5 Jun 2020 09:28:21 -0700
Peter Ehlert wrote:
> Family is using Zoom, International.
> They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
Zoom also has a native client.
Consider using a virtual machine. You will need to get sound to and from
the VM, which I don't believe works o
On 6/5/2020 6:28 PM, Peter Ehlert wrote:
Family is using Zoom, International.
They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
I use Debian Mate Stable, and Firefox ESR
I am concerned about security, duh!
Looking for ideas.
my current thoughts, in order of preference:
1. Use a separate Debian
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:56:00PM +, der.hans wrote:
> Does zoom work just in the browser without installing software?
>
> I have to use it in a couple places for work. In my experience, it demands
> installing software on both debian and Ubuntu. zoom does provi
Am 05. Jun, 2020 schwätzte Peter Ehlert so:
Family is using Zoom, International.
They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
I use Debian Mate Stable, and Firefox ESR
I am concerned about security, duh!
Looking for ideas.
my current thoughts, in order of preference:
1. Use a separate
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:45 AM Peter Ehlert wrote:
> Family is using Zoom, International.
> They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
>
> I use Debian Mate Stable, and Firefox ESR
>
> I am concerned about security, duh!
> Looking for ideas.
>
Look into Big Blue B
Family is using Zoom, International.
They will use Zoom, and I need to participate.
I use Debian Mate Stable, and Firefox ESR
I am concerned about security, duh!
Looking for ideas.
my current thoughts, in order of preference:
1. Use a separate Debian alongside my daily driver, and use Only
A Zoom invitation includes sip:12345678...@zoomcrc.com. When the
session is open and Linphone is given the URL it reports "Temporarily
Unavailable".
Does anyone have success with a similar connection?
Thanks,... Peter E.
--
https://en.wikibook
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 9:08 PM Joel Rees wrote:
> (I hope no one gets upset about double posting debian and ubuntu users
> lists.)
>
> Questions about zoom -- www.zoom.us
>
> Anyone using it?
>
> Issues?
>
> Known reasons they don't put it in the general
101 - 200 of 273 matches
Mail list logo
