On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:50:37 -0400
Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 07:45:47PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:56:45 -0400
Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest trying links2. It is light weight but does javascript,
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:56:45 -0400
Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I would suggest trying links2. It is light weight but does javascript,
SSL, etc and will help you decide if the problem is the browser or the
video rendering.
I don't see javascript support in my links2, and
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 07:45:47PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:56:45 -0400
Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest trying links2. It is light weight but does javascript,
SSL, etc and will help you decide if the problem is the browser or the
video
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:04:37PM -0500, Russell L. Harris wrote:
The system is Lenny on an i386 with
a 1700 MHz Celeron and 1 Gb RAM, ASUS P4PE motherboard.
The slow performance (nearly full processor utilization) occurs not
only with iceweasel but also with galeon (2.0.4), on a variety of
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:04:37PM -0500, Russell L. Harris wrote:
The system is Lenny on an i386 with
a 1700 MHz Celeron and 1 Gb RAM, ASUS P4PE motherboard.
The slow performance (nearly full processor utilization) occurs not
only with iceweasel but also with galeon
KS wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:04:37PM -0500, Russell L. Harris wrote:
The system is Lenny on an i386 with
a 1700 MHz Celeron and 1 Gb RAM, ASUS P4PE motherboard.
The slow performance (nearly full processor utilization) occurs not
only with iceweasel but also
* Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080314 11:14]:
It sounds like a problem with GTK (which both iceweasel and galeon use)
or a problem with the gecko engine (which both iceweasel and gelon use).
I'd suggest installing Konqueror. You don't need to install the whole
KDE DTE, it will run
* Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080312 23:56]:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 04:31:29PM -0500, Russell L. Harris wrote:
Iceweasel pushes processor utilization to 100 percent; I would like to
find a browser which is more economical.
Any process can push any processor to 100% momentarily.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 06:17:50AM +0100, Holger Dörner wrote:
Having discovered the gnome system monitor, I seldom run top anymore.
But I have a gigabyte of RAM, about half of which is user and about
half of which is cache.
Iceweasel pushes processor utilization to 100 percent; I would
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:46:32AM -0500, Russell L. Harris wrote:
* Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080312 23:56]:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 04:31:29PM -0500, Russell L. Harris wrote:
Iceweasel pushes processor utilization to 100 percent; I would like to
find a browser which is more
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:46:32AM -0500, Russell L. Harris wrote:
* Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080312 23:56]:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 04:31:29PM -0500, Russell L. Harris wrote:
Iceweasel pushes processor utilization to 100 percent; I would like to
find a
* KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080313 12:35]:
There is not need to create a new user just for testing Iceweasel for
config problems. Start Iceweasel from a terminal with the option
-ProfileManager. It starts Iceweasel's profile manager where you can
create/delete profiles. Create a new one and do the
Russell L. Harris wrote:
I typically have open half a dozen browser windows. Yesterday I was
running galeon, rather than iceweasel. While editing a file with
XEmacs, I noticed the cursor moving with jumps, rather than smoothly.
Then I saw that galeon was hogging the processor. I began
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 02:04:37PM -0500, Russell L. Harris wrote:
...
Should I follow the procedure which generally is recommended for a
Window$ installation which displays the same symptom -- reinstall the
entire system?
no.
okay, well, you certainly can if you want, but it is almost
* Valkai Elod [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080312 02:28]:
There were reports of problems with 4GB of RAM, or some kind of DMA,
I think. There are some board makers that do not want to release new
firmware to correct them. Gigabyte seems ok, Asus might be too, but
check for bios updates.
I've got a
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:35:05AM -0500, Russell L. Harris wrote:
* Valkai Elod [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080312 02:28]:
Thank you for the reply. My desire is for a general-purpose desktop
machine which is faster than an old 1700 MHz Celeron. I do not play
games or watch videos. I use 1280x1024
* Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080312 15:35]:
If you don't play games or watch videos, then what is slowing down a
1700 MHz Celeron (or any other 1700 MHz CPU) so that you want faster?
The most important thing is to have enough memory. With that Celeron
box, doing whatever you do
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 04:31:29PM -0500, Russell L. Harris wrote:
* Douglas A. Tutty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080312 15:35]:
If you don't play games or watch videos, then what is slowing down a
1700 MHz Celeron (or any other 1700 MHz CPU) so that you want faster?
The most important thing is
Having discovered the gnome system monitor, I seldom run top anymore.
But I have a gigabyte of RAM, about half of which is user and about
half of which is cache.
Iceweasel pushes processor utilization to 100 percent; I would like to
find a browser which is more economical.
I found a
I am considering an Asus M2A-VM motherboard with an AMD 690G chipset.
With Google and Yahoo I found some threads complaining about lack of
support, but some of the threads were old and some were not dated.
Is the AMD 690G chipset currently well supported in Debian?
RLH
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
20 matches
Mail list logo
