Ughn.. think google just discarded my post instead of sending. Don't
want to retype; but here's the link:
http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/Kernel.htm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.:
>
> If you just want a .deb to install, I've heard there's a makefile target in
> the kernel tarball that works fine. I believe but can't confirm that the
> .debs generated by the makefile in the kernel tarball will properly invoke
> the postint scripts that are used to
On 2011-02-10 09:18 +0100, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> If you just want a .deb to install, I've heard there's a makefile target in
> the kernel tarball that works fine.
That target is called deb-pkg, i.e. you type "make deb-pkg" and get a
nice Debian package.
> I believe but can't confirm t
In <20110209223754.5fa03...@ws82.int.tlc>, Dan Serban wrote:
>I ask. What is the "real" ... "accepted" ... and "suggested" method that I
>follow, I don't understand why kernel-package looks deprecated, or what
>have you, but any information would be appreciated.
If you want to use Debian's config
Ages ago, when amd64 wasn't part of the debian collection, I used to
compile kernels myself using make-kpkg. This worked wonderfully, when I
had to debug driver patches etc. (all is now of course stable).
Since then I've forgotten this process, but this is not my problem. I
wanted to test a fix
On Wed, Oct 21 2009, Gregor Galwas wrote:
> The only problem to be solved was the initrd. it has NOT been
> generated by dpkg during the installation.
> so I generated it using mkinitramfs -c -k 2.6.32-rc5. worked
> fine. update-grub - worked fine as well.
,[ Manual page make-kpkg(1) ]
| --i
Gregor Galwas wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Thx everybody for your quick answers and friendly help.
>
> You were right. I removed all Xen options from the kernel config and
>
> linux-image-2.6.32-rc5_20091016-2_amd64.deb
>
> has been built.
> Installing it with "dpkg -i ..." worked fine.
> The only problem
Hey,
Thx everybody for your quick answers and friendly help.
You were right. I removed all Xen options from the kernel config and
linux-image-2.6.32-rc5_20091016-2_amd64.deb
has been built.
Installing it with "dpkg -i ..." worked fine.
The only problem to be solved was the initrd. it has NOT b
Hi,
Well, firstly, if you are going to be using the buildpackage
target, instead of the far faster kernel_image target, you should
either configure /etc/kernel-pkg.conf, adding your name and email, and
have that in a keyring your gpg knows about, or pass the --us and --uc
arguments on
hello,
in the new last days I've been trying to compile a recent kernel from
kernel.org
I fetched a kernel from http://www.kernel.org/
mainline: 2.6.32-rc5 2009-10-16 [Full Source]
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/linux-2.6.32-rc5.tar.bz2
unpacked it using
On Wed October 25 2006 06:39, David Baron wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 October 2006 13:29, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:31:46PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
> > > With this install of Debian I decided to stick to what I know, and
> > > grabbed the binary installer direct from NVidia.
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 13:29, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:31:46PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
> > With this install of Debian I decided to stick to what I know, and
> > grabbed the binary installer direct from NVidia. I ran that, and in
> > less than two minutes I was up a
* Chris Bannister ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Apparently the binary installer from NVidia messes with the libraries on
> the system and is not the recommended method for installing.
>
> Read http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/Debian-nVidia/
>
> The Debian way is certainly a lot easier. Now where
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:31:46PM -0500, cothrige wrote:
> With this install of Debian I decided to stick to what I know, and
> grabbed the binary installer direct from NVidia. I ran that, and in
> less than two minutes I was up and running. No complaints from Debian
> and no complaints from NVi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>You have gotten a couple DIFFERENT approaches to installing a kernel on
Debian.
>At least one comment should send up a warning:
Yes, a level-minded user.
>On compiling with --initrd, I finally drank the coolade last year.
Before I tried to have no
>modules, compiling n
* Jameson C. Burt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You have gotten a couple DIFFERENT approaches to installing a kernel on
> Debian.
> At least one comment should send up a warning:
> if the approach becomes too intricate, or requires specialization,
> very likely you read minute details that you shoul
I look here when I compile my own kernel:
http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/
/David.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have gotten a couple DIFFERENT approaches to installing a kernel on
Debian.
At least one comment should send up a warning:
if the approach becomes too intricate, or requires specialization,
very likely you read minute details that you should never need learn
(unless you're creating Debian packa
John O'Hagan wrote:
On Sunday 22 October 2006 18:02, cothrige wrote:
[...]
In the past, as a Slackware user, I never installed an OS where I
didn't immediately compile a new kernel. Slack uses a 2.4 kernel, and
I use some peripheral items which seem to require, or at least greatly
prefer a 2
* Andrei Popescu ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> initrd's are especially useful for distros, because a kernel with all
> stuff compiled in is not an option (too big), but you still need some
> of the modules very early in the boot process, when the root filesystem
> is not accessible yet. For your
cothrige wrote:
* Tim Post ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
depmod should be called by the makefile upon make modules_install after
a successful build. Its really as easy as make, make modules_install ,
make install and a mkinitrd (if you need one).
If using GRUB, remember by default the selecti
cothrige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have never used initrd, at least not when I have compiled a kernel.
> To be entirely honest I have never fully understood just what it
> does. I was under the impression it was for things like booting from
> reiser fs and having to load modules to do it. H
* John O'Hagan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Installing the kernel-package generated by make-kpkg will automatically
> detect
> and update grub, and add itself to menu.list. How easy is that?
Now that it is a nifty feature. I suppose there is certainly
something to be said for the Debian appr
* Gilles Mocellin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> This modprobe.conf is modularized in several files (you can add one)
> in /etc/modprobe.d/.
Ahh yes, I see that. I would think I could run
'generate-modprobe.conf > ~/modprobe.conf' and then split the info up
as I need it. Shouldn't be too impos
* Tim Post ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> depmod should be called by the makefile upon make modules_install after
> a successful build. Its really as easy as make, make modules_install ,
> make install and a mkinitrd (if you need one).
>
> If using GRUB, remember by default the selection menu is hi
depmod should be called by the makefile upon make modules_install after
a successful build. Its really as easy as make, make modules_install ,
make install and a mkinitrd (if you need one).
If using GRUB, remember by default the selection menu is hidden. You'll
need to comment out the "hiddenmenu
On Monday 23 October 2006 00:36, cothrige wrote:
> * John O'Hagan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>[snip summary of Debian kernel compilation]
> Will I still have to configure grub? And will update-grub work or
> will I have to manually edit menu.lst?
[...]
Installing the kernel-package generated
Le dimanche 22 octobre 2006 16:43, cothrige a écrit :
> * Tim Post ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Hello Tim,
>
> [snip]
>
> > Then make your initrd if needed and tweak as needed, verify /etc/modules
> > is what you want it to be and you should be good to go. Cross your
> > fingers and reboot.
>
> T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/22/06 09:36, cothrige wrote:
> * John O'Hagan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Hi Patrick,
>
> Hello John,
>
[snip]
>> If you are recompiling a kernel with the same version name, you must
>> move /lib/modules/[$KERNEL_VERSION] out of the way (yo
* Tim Post ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hello Tim,
[snip]
> Then make your initrd if needed and tweak as needed, verify /etc/modules
> is what you want it to be and you should be good to go. Cross your
> fingers and reboot.
This makes me think. Recently I have gotten in the habit, after
installi
* John O'Hagan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
Hello John,
> I always compile my own kernels the Debian (testing) way like this:
>
> -Install the latest Debian linux-source package (currently
> linux-source-2.6.17); or you can use vanilla source as you describe
> -Make a symlink /usr/
On Sunday 22 October 2006 18:02, cothrige wrote:
[...]
> In the past, as a Slackware user, I never installed an OS where I
> didn't immediately compile a new kernel. Slack uses a 2.4 kernel, and
> I use some peripheral items which seem to require, or at least greatly
> prefer a 2.6 kernel. The pr
Patrick,
Its relatively easy .. and you can make it a bit easier on yourself.
Untar from kernel.org in /usr/src
be sure ncurses-dev and ncurses are present
make menuconfig and configure your kernel
now make (or make -j xx, where xx = # of cpu's if > 1) [ fancy gcc hacks
go here if your brave
For more than a year I compile my kernels the way you described
(universal vay) and I have no problems. Of course there is a debian
way but it's not a must.
Regards,
Seweryn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cothrige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sure this is a really stupid question, but having read through
> the reference and searched online (some searches involve such common
> terms they never return anything useful) I have really been unable to
> find a clear answer. I hope someone here can h
I am sure this is a really stupid question, but having read through
the reference and searched online (some searches involve such common
terms they never return anything useful) I have really been unable to
find a clear answer. I hope someone here can help.
In the past, as a Slackware user, I nev
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 10:02:28AM -0600, John Foster wrote:
> Joseph Jones wrote:
>
> >I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
> >newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my laptop's
> >NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network install from. Could
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:16:25 -0800,
"Scarletdown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am once again giving a whirl at compiling a 2.4.22 kernel; this
> time on my test box which I am telnetted into so I don't have to
> keep switching back and forth via the KV switch.
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 at 03:00 GMT, Paul Stolp penned:
> * Monique Y. Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-11 05:43]:
>>
>> Btw, I just discovered that lilo bug #222098 appears to still be live
>> in 1:22.5.8-6. It prevents me from running lilo successfully. So
>> caveat emptor and all that ...
>
* Monique Y. Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-11 05:43]:
>
> Btw, I just discovered that lilo bug #222098 appears to still be live in
> 1:22.5.8-6. It prevents me from running lilo successfully. So caveat
> emptor and all that ...
Hmm, same problem here. looked for a bug report, didn't see i
On Thursday 11 Dec 2003 6:16 am, Scarletdown wrote:
> I am once again giving a whirl at compiling a 2.4.22 kernel; this
> time on my test box which I am telnetted into so I don't have to
> keep switching back and forth via the KV switch.
>
> Anyway, I managed to unpack the tarball and create the sy
try using libncurses5 and libncurses5-dev
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 00:16, Scarletdown wrote:
> I am once again giving a whirl at compiling a 2.4.22 kernel; this time
> on my test box which I am telnetted into so I don't have to keep
> switching back and forth via the KV switch.
>
> Anyway, I manage
I am once again giving a whirl at compiling a 2.4.22 kernel; this
time on my test box which I am telnetted into so I don't have to
keep switching back and forth via the KV switch.
Anyway, I managed to unpack the tarball and create the symbolic link
to it. But when I try make menuconfig, I
Monique Y. Herman wrote:
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 at 16:02 GMT, John Foster penned:
Joseph Jones wrote:
I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my
laptop's NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 December 2003 20:35, H. S. wrote:
> So now if I use mrproper, I *always* save my .config to some other
> directory, in my case in a tmp in a user's home.
> ->HS
That's what I am doing for every kernel I compile, for every one of my
mac
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 at 19:35 GMT, H. S. penned:
> Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>
>>
>> dselect #get latest kernel src package cd
>> /usr/src/kernel-source- make mrproper #clean any leftover
>> compile stuff
>
> I tried this a few days ago, but I hadn't read the makefile to know
> what mrproper was d
Monique Y. Herman wrote:
dselect #get latest kernel src package
cd /usr/src/kernel-source-
make mrproper #clean any leftover compile stuff
I tried this a few days ago, but I hadn't read the makefile to know what
mrproper was doing and I lost my old config file which I had renamed,
IIRC, as .conf
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 at 16:02 GMT, John Foster penned:
> Joseph Jones wrote:
>
>> I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
>> newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my
>> laptop's NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network install
>> from. Could anyone
Joseph Jones wrote:
I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my laptop's
NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network install from. Could
anyone advise me as to how I do this, if possible in relation to the
ins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:00:16PM +, Joseph Jones wrote:
> I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
> newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my laptop's
> NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network
I can compile a kernel into a .deb package as described in the
newbiedoc, but I need to compile a kernel with drivers for my laptop's
NIC so I can make a rescue disc to do a network install from. Could
anyone advise me as to how I do this, if possible in relation to the
instructions in the newb
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 23:25:04 -0800 (PST)
Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I might need to set " Advanced partition
> selection " on and select some
> partition types there - but I'm not at all sure (I'm
> just curious why it's off)
You don't need any "Advanced partition" types en
Hello,
Thanks for your reply, Elizabeth !
I checked - but the Second extended fs support was
allready on.
I attached the current filesystem supports.
I think I might need to set " Advanced partition
selection " on and select some
partition types there - but I'm not at all sure (I'm
just curious
Joris writes:
> In case you allready received this question (or even answered ??) I
> apologise, but I have seen no reactions, or my own question, so I
> guess something has gone wrong
>
> The thing is, I can't figure out what's option I should choose which
> is currently off. As I thought I migh
Hello everybody,
In case you allready received this question (or even
answered ??) I apologise, but I have seen no
reactions, or my own question, so I guess something
has gone wrong
The thing is, I can't figure out what's option I
should choose which is currently off. As I thought I
might have ch
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:53:43 -0800 (PST)
Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> request_module[block_major-3]: Root fs not mounted
> UFS Cannot open root device "341" or 03:41
> Please append a correct "root" boot option
> kernel panic: UFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03.41
It looks like you di
Thanks everybody for the suggestions on a succesfull
kernel compilation
I now compiled it but it won't boot.
I get this error stuff - and I don't know what it
means :
--
request_module[block_major-3]: Root fs not mounted
UFS Cannot open root device "341" or 03:41
Please append a correct
Am Wed, 02 Apr 2003 10:10:08 +0200 schrieb Joris Huizer:
> Hello everybody,
>
> As I want scsi emulation, and I'm missing the sr_mod module, I think
> I'll have to compile a new kernel.
>
> What do I need to do for this, exactly? I'll have to get the source,
> ofcourse, but next to that ?
http:
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 23:35:10 -0800 (PST)
Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> As I want scsi emulation, and I'm missing the sr_mod
> module, I think I'll have to compile a new kernel.
>
> What do I need to do for this, exactly? I'll have to
> get the source, ofcourse, bu
In linux.debian.user, you wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> As I want scsi emulation, and I'm missing the sr_mod
> module, I think I'll have to compile a new kernel.
>
> What do I need to do for this, exactly? I'll have to
> get the source, ofcourse, but next to that ?
>
> I know allready before the
hey joris,
here's the first three steps i recommend:
# apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.20
# apt-get install kernel-package
$ cd /usr/share/doc/kernel-package
(if you're running woody, you want kernel-source-2.4.18 i believe)
debian really treats you well with kernel-compiling utilities and
do
Hello everybody,
As I want scsi emulation, and I'm missing the sr_mod
module, I think I'll have to compile a new kernel.
What do I need to do for this, exactly? I'll have to
get the source, ofcourse, but next to that ?
I know allready before the compiling many hardware
issues are going to asked.
On 12/23/02 19:46, Nathan E Norman wrote:
'man mount' tells you what the options _are_ ... finding out what the
options _do_ is a bit more work :) I haven't actually found a great
reference for ext3 yet.
Thank you.
So, 'data=ordered' (default) means that the data is written to the file system
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 18:46:07 -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 07:28:21PM -0500, Andrew Hurt wrote:
[data=journal, etc]
> > Where might I find more info on the types/benefits of these options?
>
> 'man mount' tells you what the options _are_ ... finding out what the
> opt
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 07:28:21PM -0500, Andrew Hurt wrote:
> On 12/23/02 18:57, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 06:31:30PM -0500, Andrew Hurt wrote:
> >
> >>How do I tell what type of mode I currently have
> >
> >Look in your fstab (or vgrep the output of 'mount') and look at th
On 12/23/02 18:57, Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 06:31:30PM -0500, Andrew Hurt wrote:
How do I tell what type of mode I currently have
Look in your fstab (or vgrep the output of 'mount') and look at the
options in parens after the "type ext3" bit: if you don't see
"data=journa
On Mon, Dec 23, 2002 at 06:31:30PM -0500, Andrew Hurt wrote:
> On 12/21/02 20:52, Craig Dickson wrote:
> >Frank Copeland wrote:
> >
> >>AIUI, the problem with ext3 filesystems applies only if they are in
> >>journal mode, which isn't the default. I've also seen suggestions that
> >>the bug exists i
On 12/21/02 20:52, Craig Dickson wrote:
Frank Copeland wrote:
AIUI, the problem with ext3 filesystems applies only if they are in
journal mode, which isn't the default. I've also seen suggestions that
the bug exists in several versions of the 2.4.x kernels prior to
2.4.20.
You mean "data journ
Frank Copeland wrote:
> AIUI, the problem with ext3 filesystems applies only if they are in
> journal mode, which isn't the default. I've also seen suggestions that
> the bug exists in several versions of the 2.4.x kernels prior to
> 2.4.20.
You mean "data journaling" mode -- ext3 is always journ
On 21 Dec 02 19:15:50 GMT, Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, 2.4.20 is not the kernel you want if you run ext3 filesystems.
AIUI, the problem with ext3 filesystems applies only if they are in
journal mode, which isn't the default. I've also seen suggestions that
the bug exists in
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 01:36:53PM -0600, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
> Where did you see text regarding 2.4.20 problems with ext3? The box
> has ext2 right now but I was going to convert some time after the
> kernel upgrade.
See Herbert Xu's reply to my earlier post; 2.4.20 only barfs if you
a
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 11:40:27AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > BTW, 2.4.20 is not the kernel you want if you run ext3 filesystems.
> > OTOH, 2.4.19 seems to not want to provide DRM support for the Creator.
>
> 2.4.20 ext3 is OK as long as you don'
Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BTW, 2.4.20 is not the kernel you want if you run ext3 filesystems.
> OTOH, 2.4.19 seems to not want to provide DRM support for the Creator.
2.4.20 ext3 is OK as long as you don't enable data=journal (the default
is data=ordered).
--
Debian GNU/Linu
Nathan E Norman said:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 01:40:51AM -0600, Gerald V. Livingston II
> wrote:
>> Is there any special info on getting a 2.4.20 kernel to compile
>> under
>> woody on a Sun UltraSparc-1 Creator.
>>
>> Yes, the Debian Way (tm) -- or not, I don't care. Right now it fails
>> at th
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 12:02:33AM -0800, nate wrote:
> I don't have personal experience with linux on sparc yet, Downloading
> the woody ISOs for it now and plan to install it on my ultra 1 probably
> tomorrow though.
Don't waste time with the ISOs. Set up a RARP server and TFTP server
on an exi
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 01:40:51AM -0600, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
> Is there any special info on getting a 2.4.20 kernel to compile under
> woody on a Sun UltraSparc-1 Creator.
>
> Yes, the Debian Way (tm) -- or not, I don't care. Right now it fails
> at the "make dep" stage using either me
nate said:
> Gerald V. Livingston II said:
>> Is there any special info on getting a 2.4.20 kernel to compile
>> under
>> woody on a Sun UltraSparc-1 Creator.
>
>
> I'm not sure how closely you track the kernel but I've read several
> places that the "generic" kernel is rarely the choice for anyt
Gerald V. Livingston II said:
> Is there any special info on getting a 2.4.20 kernel to compile under
> woody on a Sun UltraSparc-1 Creator.
I'm not sure how closely you track the kernel but I've read several
places that the "generic" kernel is rarely the choice for anything
other then x86. the n
Is there any special info on getting a 2.4.20 kernel to compile under
woody on a Sun UltraSparc-1 Creator.
Yes, the Debian Way (tm) -- or not, I don't care. Right now it fails
at the "make dep" stage using either method. First it was some missing
header files. Figured out where they were and got t
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 04:07:04PM -0500, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> I've got an Athlon XP 2000 system running as my desktop machine. I've
> also got a PIII 850 laptop and a p133 mail server. While recompiling the
> kernel on the laptop isn't too time consuming it still takes almost
> twice as long
Alex Malinovich, 2002-Oct-15 16:07 -0500:
> I've got an Athlon XP 2000 system running as my desktop machine. I've
> also got a PIII 850 laptop and a p133 mail server. While recompiling the
> kernel on the laptop isn't too time consuming it still takes almost
> twice as long as it does on my deskto
On Tuesday 15 October 2002 14:07, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> I've got an Athlon XP 2000 system running as my desktop machine. I've
> also got a PIII 850 laptop and a p133 mail server. While recompiling the
> kernel on the laptop isn't too time consuming it still takes almost
> twice as long as it do
I've got an Athlon XP 2000 system running as my desktop machine. I've
also got a PIII 850 laptop and a p133 mail server. While recompiling the
kernel on the laptop isn't too time consuming it still takes almost
twice as long as it does on my desktop. And don't even get me started
about the p133...
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 03:08:13PM +0300, Tuomo Karhu wrote:
> Could you give me main commands and short help/explanation howto compile
> debian kernel?
I prefere to use make-kpkg the Debian-Kernel-Package-Manager. I think
you have to install the kernel-package. It produces Kernel-.deb
packages a
On Sat May 04, 2002 at 03:45:42PM -0400, Kapil Khosla wrote:
>
> If you want it really really short
> apt-cache search kernel-image
>
> You will get a variety of hits
> Choose 1
>
> apt-get install kernel-image...
>
> You dont need anything else, It will modify lilo.conf, etc etc, and you j
On Sat, 2002-05-04 at 08:08, Tuomo Karhu wrote:
> Could you give me main commands and short help/explanation howto compile
> debian kernel?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tuomo Karhu
Check out chapter 9 of the Debian FAQ:
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-kernel.html
Nick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
If you want it really really short
apt-cache search kernel-image
You will get a variety of hits
Choose 1
apt-get install kernel-image...
You dont need anything else, It will modify lilo.conf, etc etc, and you just
reboot :)
If you wanna really compile a kernel, In debian you can use some
Use the guide on this site http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/tutorials/kernel-pkg.en/intro-kernel-pkg.html
Cheers.
Jonas
-Original Message-
From: Tuomo Karhu
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 4 maj 2002 14:08
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: compiling a
Could you give me main commands and short
help/explanation howto compile debian kernel?
Thanks.
Tuomo Karhu
I did it!!!
As root I checked disk space, and did: make-kpkg --revision=3:custom.1.0
kernel_image (with an underscore).
And it works, I get the image.deb and after dpkg -i it is installed.
After rebooting it's a bit dissapointing that my new kernel will not work, but
I'm going to start to find
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 12:30:33AM +, Hans Steinraht wrote:
>
> - make-kpkg --revision Custum.1 kernel-image
>
This has never failed me:
make-kpkg --revision=3:custom.1.0 kernel_image
John
--
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Using [Debian] Linux
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
pgpjm8INeNUQs.pgp
Descripti
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 12:30:49AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > - make-kpkg clean
> > - make menuconfig
> > - make-kpkg --revision Custum.1 kernel-image
>
> It is called kernel_image, an underscore, not -.
Yes but reading make-kpkg perl script, it seems to accept both as same
target as undocume
#include
Hans Steinraht wrote on Sat Oct 06, 2001 um 12:30:33AM:
>
> --
Hehe, never put -- at the beginning, it is a sign for beginning a
signature and some software cuts everything below.
> - make-kpkg clean
> - make menuconfig
> - make-kpkg --revision Custum.1 kernel-image
It is called kern
--
Hi,
I just started with Debian, installed the compact unstable version and came to
the conclusion that I had to compile a new kernel to let Debian do the things I
want.
This is the firsttime I'm doing this, so I followed the steps described in the
Debian GNU/Linux FAQ, and in the README f
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 12:52:20AM +, Rajesh Fowkar wrote:
> This is at one of my clients place. He has got an athlon machine. Are there
> any issues in compiling the kernel on a different machine with a different
> processor ? Now I am thinking of compiling the kernel for this Celerone
> machi
I tried compiling a kernel (2.2.17) for the first time. It compiled,
rebooted, and generally worked okay, but there were a few problems
1) I received a startup message indicating that I was using kerneld and
almost certainly didn't want to. I don't know how I turned it on, so I
don&
Sebastiaan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> has anyone an idea how to cross compile a kernel, so to compile a kernel
> for a ppc on an i386?
>
> Just curius.
>
> Greetz,
> Sebastiaan
Hi,
you'll have to set up gcc as a cross compiler and look at the patches
in the kernel sources for ppc.
regards
Albrecht
Hi,
has anyone an idea how to cross compile a kernel, so to compile a kernel
for a ppc on an i386?
Just curius.
Greetz,
Sebastiaan
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 30-Jan-2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I know this is possible (I even vaguely remember seeing it menti
On 30 Jan 2001, "Hall Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have this worry about all those bits I marked as Modules,
> > though. I guess I have to copy those too, hmm? From where
> > to where? Is there anything else I should worry about?
>
> I think most people will suggest you use the "ma
> I know this is possible (I even vaguely remember seeing
> it mentioned somewhere).
>
> What I want to do is compile a kernel on my desktop
> PC for my laptop. Just build it, copy the new kernel image
> across the network, rejig the laptop's lilo, reboot it, and
> Roberta's your crossdressing Aunt
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
