On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 12:29:30PM -0800, Adam Shand wrote:
If you're really hard core about security and encryption (and I'm going
to be heretical here, but hey, I have to plug my home), try OpenBSD.
Since it's main repository is in Canada, US crypto laws don't apply. I
played with it
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:27:52PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
and if you want to compile them there's always 'apt-get --compile source
packagename'. if you haven't used it before here's how it works :)
with the annoying side affect of apt insisting on replacing the
locally compiled
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 12:29:30PM -0800, Adam Shand wrote:
If you're really hard core about security and encryption (and I'm going
to be heretical here, but hey, I have to plug my home), try OpenBSD.
Since it's main repository is in Canada, US crypto laws don't apply. I
played with it
Ethan == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and if you want to compile them there's always 'apt-get
--compile source packagename'. if you haven't used it before
here's how it works :)
with the annoying side affect of apt insisting on replacing the
locally compiled
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 02:02:35AM -0400, Marshal Kar-Cheung Wong wrote:
Ethan == Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and if you want to compile them there's always 'apt-get
--compile source packagename'. if you haven't used it before
here's how it works :)
with
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:27:52PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
and if you want to compile them there's always 'apt-get --compile source
packagename'. if you haven't used it before here's how it works :)
with the annoying side affect of apt insisting on replacing the
locally compiled
On Sat, Apr 22, 2000 at 01:25:15AM -0500, Brad wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 08:27:52PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
and if you want to compile them there's always 'apt-get --compile source
packagename'. if you haven't used it before here's how it works :)
with the annoying side
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
I guess ultimately, what would be best, would be to keep track of the
sources that you have installed, so that you know when the sources
have been updated. Or have apt recompile for you.
well i just don't understand why apt thinks it should
Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--revision just sets an epoch, which is rather evil since it will
think your package is newwer then ANY upgraded package unless the
upgraded package has an epoch yours.
The --revision flag in kernel-package only makes an epoch if you
explicitly
9 matches
Mail list logo
