On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 06:12:47PM +0100, Kevin Price wrote:
>Dear Steve:
>
>Am 18.01.24 um 00:37 schrieb Steve McIntyre:
>> Kevin Price wrote:
>>> I'm not quite sure where to address this to,
>
>> Argh, that's my code in the debian-cd package. "r
Dear Steve:
Am 18.01.24 um 00:37 schrieb Steve McIntyre:
> Kevin Price wrote:
>> I'm not quite sure where to address this to,
> Argh, that's my code in the debian-cd package. "reportbug debian-cd"
> should do the right thing...
Thank you for your help, I s
d. Maybe there's a bug already that I didn't find.
Argh, that's my code in the debian-cd package. "reportbug debian-cd"
should do the right thing...
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky,
Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...
On 17 Jan 2024 18:00 +0100, from k...@osnanet.de (Kevin Price):
> Could anyone please help me find where to file this bug to? Any ideas
> much appreciated. Maybe there's a bug already that I didn't find.
The canonical starting point is https://bugs.debian.org
Notably for this situation, near the
Hi all!
I'm not quite sure where to address this to, but I'm certain this is a
bug: If you download debian installer media, for instance
debian-12.4.0-amd64-DLBD-2.iso, they prominenty include the files
"README.txt" and "README.html". Those presumably somehow auto-generated
README files say, in th
On 2023-08-08 10:52 a.m., Matthieu Roquejoffre wrote:
On 2023-08-08 at 03:37 p.m., Juan R.D. Silva wrote:> The problem is
resolved. My fault. :-).
Could you please explain to us what the cause of your issue was and how
you solved it ?
This could be useful for anyone facing a similar issue.
The
On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 11:18 AM Matthieu Roquejoffre
wrote:
>
> On 2023-08-08 at 03:37 p.m., Juan R.D. Silva wrote:> The problem is
> resolved. My fault. :-).
> Could you please explain to us what the cause of your issue was and how
> you solved it ?
> This could be useful for anyone facing a simi
On 2023-08-08 at 03:37 p.m., Juan R.D. Silva wrote:> The problem is
resolved. My fault. :-).
Could you please explain to us what the cause of your issue was and how
you solved it ?
This could be useful for anyone facing a similar issue.
Relevant xkcd: https://xkcd.com/979/
--
Matthieu Roquejof
On 2023-08-06 9:28 p.m., Juan R.D. Silva wrote:
I downloaded debian-12.1.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso, SHA512SUMS, and
SHA512SUMS.sign files from
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-dvd/.
$ sha512sum -c SHA512SUMS gives me OK. So the image is fine.
However verifying the signatures
On 2023-08-06 9:28 p.m., Juan R.D. Silva wrote:
I downloaded debian-12.1.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso, SHA512SUMS, and
SHA512SUMS.sign files from
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-dvd/.
$ sha512sum -c SHA512SUMS gives me OK. So the image is fine.
However verifying the signatures
I downloaded debian-12.1.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso, SHA512SUMS, and
SHA512SUMS.sign files from
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-dvd/.
$ sha512sum -c SHA512SUMS gives me OK. So the image is fine.
However verifying the signatures fails.
$ gpg --verify SHA512SUMS.sign SHA512SUMS
Hi,
Semih Ozlem wrote:
> Can someone familiar with bootcd, xorriso, debian-cd explain how and for
> what purpose those commands are used?
xorriso produces and manipulates ISO 9660 filesystems, which may be
bootable from optical media and disk-like media.
debian-cd is the tool by whi
Hi everyone,
Can someone familiar with bootcd, xorriso, debian-cd explain how and for
what purpose those commands are used?
Is it possible to make an iso of one's current working system (installed or
from a live version) or a backup with these commands, and what is the
correct usage o
On 10/20/17 12:25, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
the weekly testing ISOs for i386 and amd64 are now equipped with the
new MBR:
https://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
...
Testers wanted for booting this ISO from USB stick.
Boots correc
Hi,
Florent Larose wrote:
> (It's just i feel not to be arrived yet ...
> Indeed the first time i use jigdo ...)
The way may be long, depending on the destination.
Before you download all 13 DVD images by jigdo, you should have a plan
what to do with them. To burn them to 13 DVD media would be n
otmail.com
Objet : Re: jigdo-lite for windows (from debian-cd list)
Hi,
we should move this to debian-user mailing list, as it is more about installing
from the MS-Windows world and not about the installation ISOs themselves.
Please send your further replies to
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Th
/debian-cd/2016/02/msg00010.html
and switches to english at
https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2016/02/msg00012.html
I demonstrated a jigdo-lite download on Debian in
https://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2016/02/msg00014.html
Florent Larose wrote on debian-cd:
> You said : " Debian mirr
Em 05-03-2013 08:31, Muhammad Yousuf Khan escreveu:
thanks all and specially João Luis Meloni Assirati for providing such
brief instruction and advices. would please be kind enough and share
me a howto for creating a mirror server for LAN. which auto sync and
updates all the new packages.
I have
thanks all and specially João Luis Meloni Assirati for providing such
brief instruction and advices. would please be kind enough and share
me a howto for creating a mirror server for LAN. which auto sync and
updates all the new packages.
Thanks,
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:58 PM, João Luis Meloni
Em 05-03-2013 07:27, Muhammad Yousuf Khan escreveu:
i have downloaded all the Debian 6 DVDs from the repo. but as per my
knowledge when i run "apt-get install" it directly go to
internet how come i tell apt-get or dpkg to install it from DVDs and
secondly it should ask for the correct DVD like Mi
There is an apt-cd package to be used for what you want to do and you may
need to edit /etc/apt/sources.list as well. On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, Muhammad
Yousuf Khan wrote:
> i have downloaded all the Debian 6 DVDs from the repo. but as per my
> knowledge when i run "apt-get install " it directly go to
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 03:27:21PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> i have downloaded all the Debian 6 DVDs from the repo. but as per my
> knowledge when i run "apt-get install " it directly go to
> internet how come i tell apt-get or dpkg to install it from DVDs and
> secondly it should ask fo
i have downloaded all the Debian 6 DVDs from the repo. but as per my
knowledge when i run "apt-get install " it directly go to
internet how come i tell apt-get or dpkg to install it from DVDs and
secondly it should ask for the correct DVD like Microsoft does. for
example. if samba is placed in DVD
Hi,
I am learning about relative tools, from trying to make a netinst CD.
Well, I got the tools, and made the deb mirror. Edited the CONF.sh, then
$ . CONF.sh
$ make distclean
$ make status
Updating task files...
- copying task files from 'tasks/sid/'
- copying firwmare task file from 'tasks/fi
Quoting Kumar Appaiah on 2010-09-10 13:18:06, in Message-Id
<20100910181805.gi13...@146653177.ece.utexas.edu>
> If someone else can point our the "right" way, please do.
,[ /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/00trustcdrom ]-
| APT::Authentication::TrustCDROM "true";
`
--
_ Brian Ryans 8B2A 54C4 E275
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 06:26:49PM +0300, Onur Aslan wrote:
> In the early times, I was manually sign my local Release. Maybe I should
> continue to do this.
Since I don't have any other ideas, I'd actually not be averse to
that. You could sign your repository yourself, with a key which APT is
awa
n Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:25:54AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > > Please paste the error message here. It would contain the key ID.
> >
> > There is no error. Debian CD images doesn't have any signature or key.
>
> I see. I thought apt-get update would actual
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 03:36:03PM +0300, Onur Aslan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:25:54AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > Please paste the error message here. It would contain the key ID.
>
> There is no error. Debian CD images doesn't have any signature or key.
I se
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:25:54AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Please paste the error message here. It would contain the key ID.
There is no error. Debian CD images doesn't have any signature or key.
Or maybe I am doing something wrong.
Also I want to add, I don't have any CD-RO
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 06:58:01AM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Is there a particular reason why you don't want to use apt-cdrom to
> use the CD repositories? It is much easier than mounting the CD to use
> it.
I also tried apt-cdrom but I have same problem with apt-cdrom.
I added my image with:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 03:14:11PM +0300, Onur Aslan wrote:
> > In any case, to fix the error you get, you have to identify the GPG
> > key corresponding to the CD, and obtain it (preferably in a trusted
> > manner), and do
> >
> > sudo apt-ket add - < key
>
> Where can I get this keys? CD images
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 02:22:19PM +0300, Onur Aslan wrote:
> I am using Debian CD images as a local repository. I am mounting a CD and
> using it with this source list:
>
> deb file:///mnt lenny main
>
> Everything working fine but the problem is when I try to install a p
Hi.
I am using Debian CD images as a local repository. I am mounting a CD and
using it with this source list:
deb file:///mnt lenny main
Everything working fine but the problem is when I try to install a package
from this repository, apt is always warn me about untrusted repository.
Is it
Robert Holtzman schreef:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:15:22AM +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
Robert Holtzman schreef:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 06:03:37PM -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
On 7/28/10 4:40 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
What was the reason for that? The usual plan is to put /home, at least,
Thank You for Your time and answer, Sjoerd:
> The only exception of course is a
> separate /boot to avoid boot problems.
May You'll be laughing but this did now work for me. - I had the boot
problems.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
Thank You for Your time and answer, Robert:
> What was the reason for that? The usual plan is to put /home, at
> least, on a separate partition.
I've heard about diver strategies on FS dividing but like some kind
of optimization that is in FS view is this: the free space is
dynamically shared for
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:15:22AM +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> Robert Holtzman schreef:
> >On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 06:03:37PM -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> >>On 7/28/10 4:40 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> >>>What was the reason for that? The usual plan is to put /home, at least,
> >>>on a separa
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:34:06 +0200 Aniruddha
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Perry E. Metzger
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:46:29 +0200 Aniruddha
> > wrote:
> >> I have done some testing with Debian stable in Virtualbox and I
> >> have to say XFS works as advertised. I did power
Robert Holtzman schreef:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 06:03:37PM -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
On 7/28/10 4:40 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
What was the reason for that? The usual plan is to put /home, at least,
on a separate partition.
The *usual* plan is to put it on a separate drive (but since deb
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 06:03:37PM -0500, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> On 7/28/10 4:40 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> >
> >What was the reason for that? The usual plan is to put /home, at least,
> >on a separate partition.
> >
>
> The *usual* plan is to put it on a separate drive (but since debian
> can'
On Tuesday 27 July 2010 15:09:08 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Volkan YAZICI put forth on 7/27/2010 2:04 PM:
> > unplugged machine. At boot, I dropped to fsck command line. At command
>
> Were you forced to the command line or did you manually select to go to the
> command line? It sounds like you chose
On 7/28/10 4:40 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:43:59PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
Thank You for Your time and answer, Wolodja:
Using ext4 for /boot is discouraged but you can give it a try. Why do
you need /boot to be ext4?
Because I have single partition. :)
What was t
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:43:59PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Wolodja:
>
> > Using ext4 for /boot is discouraged but you can give it a try. Why do
> > you need /boot to be ext4?
>
> Because I have single partition. :)
What was the reason for that? The usual pla
Op 28-07-10 21:34, Aniruddha schreef:
> Agreed, it was hardly a double-blind randomized trial :) On a more
> serious note: off course these tests don't prove anything. On the
> other hand I have heard so many time that XFS can't handle a single
> power failure without data corruption that I wanted
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:46:29 +0200 Aniruddha
> wrote:
>> I have done some testing with Debian stable in Virtualbox and I have
>> to say XFS works as advertised. I did power off the virtual machine
>> several times when working in Gnome /
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:46:29 +0200 Aniruddha
wrote:
> I have done some testing with Debian stable in Virtualbox and I have
> to say XFS works as advertised. I did power off the virtual machine
> several times when working in Gnome / copying files. And I did power
> off the virtual 5 times in a row
Paul E Condon put forth on 7/27/2010 8:53 PM:
> Your original post in this thread addressed a quite disfunctional
> attitude of OP, and IMHO, was correct but somewhat harshly worded.
> In truth, he simply cannot have everything he wants all at the
> same time. You should have left it at that, IMH
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Wolodja:
>
>> Using ext4 for /boot is discouraged but you can give it a try. Why do
>> you need /boot to be ext4?
>
> Because I have single partition. :)
>
> Well. For now I have tried w/ two - /boot as ext3 a
Thank You for Your time and answer, Wolodja:
> Using ext4 for /boot is discouraged but you can give it a try. Why do
> you need /boot to be ext4?
Because I have single partition. :)
Well. For now I have tried w/ two - /boot as ext3 and / as ext4 -
nothing happened - I got the into the same situa
Stan:
> My apologies for being rude, but someone needed to slap you upside
> the head and bring you to reality.
For the future please note, any your farther talks will be
silently ignored by me.
PS Sorry for this being sent to whole the list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@li
I have done some testing with Debian stable in Virtualbox and I have
to say XFS works as advertised. I did power off the virtual machine
several times when working in Gnome / copying files. And I did power
off the virtual 5 times in a row when booting. Nothing happened. Each
time the virtual machin
Dne, 28. 07. 2010 03:53:43 je Paul E Condon napisal(a):
Stan,
Have you ever heard of the term 'invincible ignorance'?
Also, you have asserted with some vigor upstream
Your original post ... IMHO, was correct but somewhat harshly worded.
Peace.
IMHO, Stan's deep, invaluable expertise is
On Ma, 27 iul 10, 23:43:07, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> I read debian-user locally via a mail-to-news gateway, which makes it
> much more hassle for me to sign messages.
Joke aside, I'd rather you continue reading debian-user, so whatever
works for you is good ;)
Kudos to you and the other DDs[1]
On 20100727_134650, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Volkan YAZICI put forth on 7/27/2010 12:29 PM:
>
> > I don't even think Linus is using XFS too. Isn't he a technical person
>
> Linus uses them all. You should know that.
>
> > in terms of your definition? So what should we do in that case? Ask to
> >
Rob Owens put forth on 7/27/2010 4:36 PM:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 01:39:18PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Volkan YAZICI put forth on 7/27/2010 12:19 PM:
>>
>>> About a year ago, in a similar rush to yours, I ported two of our
>>> PostgreSQL database servers to XFS. During testing period, I even
Aaron Toponce wrote:
>On 7/26/2010 11:46 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> On Lu, 26 iul 10, 12:42:05, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>>
>>> As an ex-DPL and the guy who puts together the official release Debian
>>> CDs, I can vouch for his work. It's been very useful for me in the past.
>>
>> You forgot to GP
On 7/26/2010 11:46 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 26 iul 10, 12:42:05, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>
>> As an ex-DPL and the guy who puts together the official release Debian
>> CDs, I can vouch for his work. It's been very useful for me in the past.
>
> You forgot to GPG sign the mail :p
Maybe th
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 01:39:18PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Volkan YAZICI put forth on 7/27/2010 12:19 PM:
>
> > About a year ago, in a similar rush to yours, I ported two of our
> > PostgreSQL database servers to XFS. During testing period, I even
> > couldn't *recover* the / fs after the ve
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Aniruddha wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Stan Hoeppner
> wrote:
>> Aniruddha put forth on 7/27/2010 2:47 PM:
>>> Time for some testing, I will put Debian stable with XFS on my laptop and
>>> see how well it deals with power failures :)
>>
>> Thanks
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Aniruddha put forth on 7/27/2010 2:47 PM:
>> Time for some testing, I will put Debian stable with XFS on my laptop and
>> see how well it deals with power failures :)
>
> Thanks for picking up the torch/gauntlet/whatever. How do you laptop
Aniruddha put forth on 7/27/2010 2:47 PM:
> Time for some testing, I will put Debian stable with XFS on my laptop and
> see how well it deals with power failures :)
Thanks for picking up the torch/gauntlet/whatever. How do you laptop test
this issue? It's a laptop. Yank the battery? Yanking t
Volkan YAZICI put forth on 7/27/2010 2:04 PM:
> unplugged machine. At boot, I dropped to fsck command line. At command
Were you forced to the command line or did you manually select to go to the
command line? It sounds like you chose to, not forced to.
> prompt, I manually fiddled around with f
Time for some testing, I will put Debian stable with XFS on my laptop and
see how well it deals with power failures :)
Volkan YAZICI put forth on 7/27/2010 12:59 PM:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner writes:
>> I'd also like to add that anyone smart enough to be on this list is smart
>> enough to know you should have a UPS, regardless of what filesystem you use.
>> If you're not you shouldn't be here. If you d
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner writes:
> What write operations were you performing at the time you pulled the plug?
> Unless you were writing the superblock it'd be almost impossible to hose the
> filesystem to the point it couldn't mount. Were you doing a resize operation
> when you pulled t
Volkan YAZICI put forth on 7/27/2010 12:29 PM:
> I don't even think Linus is using XFS too. Isn't he a technical person
Linus uses them all. You should know that.
> in terms of your definition? So what should we do in that case? Ask to
> RMS?
kernel.org servers all run XFS as well.
--
Stan
Volkan YAZICI put forth on 7/27/2010 12:19 PM:
> About a year ago, in a similar rush to yours, I ported two of our
> PostgreSQL database servers to XFS. During testing period, I even
> couldn't *recover* the / fs after the very first power failure test.
What write operations were you performing a
Stan Hoeppner writes:
> I'd also like to add that anyone smart enough to be on this list is
> smart enough to know you should have a UPS, regardless of what
> filesystem you use. If you're not you shouldn't be here.
I guess I don't belong here then...
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Aniruddha put forth on 7/27/2010 12:03 PM:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> Volkan YAZICI put forth on 7/27/2010 8:22 AM:
>>
>>> You are missing a very important point: Durability to power failures.
>>> (Excuse me, but a majority of GNU/Linux users are not switched to a
Dne, 27. 07. 2010 19:48:53 je Mark napisal(a):
>
> NASA also trusts Windows and NTFS too?
>
NASA also backs up their data on 5.25" floppy disks [1].
[1] *completely made up information
NASA as an authority on reliable storage? C'mon, the bozos can't even
be trusted with their own Challen
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner writes:
> I'd also like to add that anyone smart enough to be on this list is smart
> enough to know you should have a UPS, regardless of what filesystem you use.
> If you're not you shouldn't be here. If you disagree on the technical merits
> (not cost), you're
We use XFS in production at work. Where I work, we are routinely dealing
with hundreds of terabytes of data (I have heard the word "petabyte" bandied
about in several meetings), so we are beyond or hovering on the edge of the
size limits and performance limits of the ext filesystems.
At home, I pr
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner writes:
> > NASA trusts it with over 1PB of storage, but _you_ don't trust it? Who
> are
> > you again? How many hundreds of TB of storage do you manage on EXT3/4?
> ;)
>
> NASA also trusts Windows and
On Tue July 27 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> I'd also like to add that anyone smart enough to be on this list is smart
> enough to know you should have a UPS, regardless of what filesystem you
> use. If you're not you shouldn't be here. If you disagree on the technical
> merits (not cost), you're u
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner writes:
> NASA trusts it with over 1PB of storage, but _you_ don't trust it? Who are
> you again? How many hundreds of TB of storage do you manage on EXT3/4? ;)
NASA also trusts Windows and NTFS too? Who are you again?
I think you are confusing apples and ora
Aniruddha put forth on 7/27/2010 9:43 AM:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
>
>>
>> You are missing a very important point: Durability to power failures.
>> (Excuse me, but a majority of GNU/Linux users are not switched to a UPS
>> or something.) And that's where XFS totally
On 7/27/2010 11:20 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Aaron Toponce put forth on 7/27/2010 10:41 AM:
>
>> XFS has also had a history for randomly corrupting data. While this
>> might have improved over time, I don't trust it.
>
> Can you cite or reference anything to back your claim? Time frame? Irix o
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner writes:
> Volkan YAZICI put forth on 7/27/2010 8:22 AM:
> 1. Never quote forum or email posts as empirical or reliable evidence of
> anything.
You're right, my bad.
> You quoted this FAQ item solely based on the tile, without reading it,
> in your effort to de
Aaron Toponce put forth on 7/27/2010 10:41 AM:
> XFS has also had a history for randomly corrupting data. While this
> might have improved over time, I don't trust it.
Can you cite or reference anything to back your claim? Time frame? Irix or
Linux? Serious users reported this or casual/hobbyi
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Volkan YAZICI put forth on 7/27/2010 8:22 AM:
>
> > You are missing a very important point: Durability to power failures.
> > (Excuse me, but a majority of GNU/Linux users are not switched to a UPS
> > or something.) And that's where XFS tota
On Tuesday 27 July 2010 09:51:53 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Lisi put forth on 7/27/2010 2:23 AM:
> > On Tuesday 27 July 2010 08:10:15 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> >> XFS which is superior to all other Linux filesystems.
> >
> > Stan -
> >
> > Have you the time to give a rationale for this?
>
> Sure.
Thanks,
Volkan YAZICI put forth on 7/27/2010 8:22 AM:
> You are missing a very important point: Durability to power failures.
> (Excuse me, but a majority of GNU/Linux users are not switched to a UPS
> or something.) And that's where XFS totally fails[1][2].
> [1] http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-List
On 7/27/2010 1:23 AM, Lisi wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 July 2010 08:10:15 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> XFS which is superior to all other Linux filesystems.
>
> Stan -
>
> Have you the time to give a rationale for this?
Except XFS filesystems can't shrink, only grow. Sucks when you need to
resize parti
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
>
> You are missing a very important point: Durability to power failures.
> (Excuse me, but a majority of GNU/Linux users are not switched to a UPS
> or something.) And that's where XFS totally fails[1][2].
>
Ext3 has the same problems when n
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Stan Hoeppner writes:
> 1. Best overall performance for most systems, large and small, and the FS
> creation and mounting parameters are super configurable to match the system
> hardware for best performance. One recent set of recent benchmarks
> demonstrating so:
> http://bt
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 01:51, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> Debian will _always_ default to an EXT* filesystem--until the end of time.
Nope, btrfs will replace ext3/4 as default soon enough.
Cheers,
Kelly Clowers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Lisi put forth on 7/27/2010 2:23 AM:
> On Tuesday 27 July 2010 08:10:15 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> XFS which is superior to all other Linux filesystems.
>
> Stan -
>
> Have you the time to give a rationale for this?
Sure.
1. Best overall performance for most systems, large and small, and the FS
c
On Tuesday 27 July 2010 08:10:15 Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> XFS which is superior to all other Linux filesystems.
Stan -
Have you the time to give a rationale for this?
I'm not in any way impugning your knowledge. But I am at the stage of
accepting the default that Lenny gives me, for no better
Sthu Deus put forth on 7/26/2010 6:00 AM:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Wolodja:
>
>> Why don't you just use the images provided by kmuto? They are exactly
>> what you are looking for. I don't get your resistence ...
>
> No any resistance absolutely! I think too that it is the thing I'm
>
Thank You for Your time and answer, Wolodja:
> Go to http://db.debian.org/search.cgi and search for
>
> First name: Kenshi
> Last name: Muto
>
> Which will provide further information about Kenshi like his IRC name
> (i.e. kmuto) and his GPG fingerprint. You could also check for his key
> in t
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 06:00:34PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Wolodja:
>
> > Why don't you just use the images provided by kmuto? They are exactly
> > what you are looking for. I don't get your resistence ...
>
> No any resistance absolutely! I think too that it
On Monday 26 July 2010 14:25:47 Sthu Deus wrote:
> > Or you could still always do as has been suggested several times: use
> > Kenshi Muto's installer.
>
> As soon as I understand that it is trustworthy.
You aren't going to do so because you don't accept it. If you want the sort
of stability and
On Lu, 26 iul 10, 12:42:05, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> As an ex-DPL and the guy who puts together the official release Debian
> CDs, I can vouch for his work. It's been very useful for me in the past.
You forgot to GPG sign the mail :p
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users a
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 08:17:06PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Thank You for Your time and answer, Ron:
>
> > What part of "This directory provides Debian GNU/Linux Stable
> > installer ISO images with a modification by Kenshi Muto to support
> > newer hardwares, such as SATA and Ethernet devices.
Thank You for Your time and answer, Lisi:
> If you don't like any of the suggestions, you have four choices:
>
> 1) Do nothing, use a filing system which is used in the basic Lenny
> installation and wait for Squeeze to become Stable.
That's my choice for now.
> 2) Use Squeeze; it is apparentl
Thank You for Your time and answer, Ron:
> What part of "This directory provides Debian GNU/Linux Stable
> installer ISO images with a modification by Kenshi Muto to support
> newer hardwares, such as SATA and Ethernet devices." don't you
> understand?
Sorry, what are You talking about?
--
On Monday 26 July 2010 16:19:29 Lisi wrote:
> From:
> Lisi
> To:
> debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date:
> Today 16:17:54
[snip]
Sorry everyone.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
From:
Lisi
To:
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date:
Today 16:17:54
On Monday 26 July 2010 15:43:55 Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Klistvud wrote:
> > Dne, 26. 07. 2010 14:08:50 je Wolodja Wentland napisal(a):
> >> > 1. If it is trustable/secure as the stable Debian (for
On Monday 26 July 2010 15:43:55 Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Klistvud wrote:
> > Dne, 26. 07. 2010 14:08:50 je Wolodja Wentland napisal(a):
> >> > 1. If it is trustable/secure as the stable Debian (for for now all I
> >> > have is just phrases like "believe me" w/ no any farthe
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 16:46 +0200, Klistvud wrote:
> >Google for "Kenshi Muto Debian" and "Kenshi Muto
> >site:lists.debian.org"
> >and you should get enough information to answer that question. I
> >am not
> >aware of any "official" Debian initiated poll that answers the
> >question
> >"What do
1 - 100 of 447 matches
Mail list logo
