On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:38:42AM -0400, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, October 17, 2019 05:25:46 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:08:34AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19507225
> >
> > Sorry. T
On Thursday, October 17, 2019 05:25:46 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:08:34AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19507225
>
> Sorry. That link forces you through Twitter. Here are better
> ones:
>
> https://old.lwn.
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:08:34AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19507225
Sorry. That link forces you through Twitter. Here are better
ones:
https://old.lwn.net/Articles/784758/
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/cisco-botches-f
the shell service where I do most of my internet work is
> >> using Ubuntu.
> >> For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no
> >> longer filtering at the level it did previously.
> >> Has something happened to the program ?
> >> Is the
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:27:50PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work is
> using Ubuntu.
> For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no longer
> filtering at the level it did previously.
>
> Has something happened to the program ?
There has nothing happend to the program. The type of spam you are
receiving has changed. I don't know much about your mail setup but spam
has to fight on different levels when processing mails.
> Is there a better spam filtering option for shell ser
purposes and he refused their request then all of the spam
started.
On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 12:38:18
From: Karen Lewellen
To: Jude DaShiell
Cc: Cindy-Sue Causey ,
Debian Users
Subject: Re: spam filtering question?
Hi there,
Yes I am running sa
On 2016-12-11, Henning Follmann wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 04:46:19PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>> What favored Ubuntu help list?
>> I stated at the outset that I use a service. I do not administrate that
>> service.
>>
>>
>
> Never mind her, she's a fear biter. When you mentioned "ubu
Users
Subject: Re: spam filtering question?
Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:47:05 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
What favored Ubuntu help list?
I stated at the outset that I use a service. I do not administrate that
service.
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Cindy-Sue Causey
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 04:46:19PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> What favored Ubuntu help list?
> I stated at the outset that I use a service. I do not administrate that
> service.
>
>
Never mind her, she's a fear biter. When you mentioned "ubuntu" her reflexes
kicked in.
Anywho...
Explain y
ally ain't
complaining.
Good luck with your filtering efforts.
>
> On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
>
>> On 12/9/16, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>>> Greetings folks,
>>> shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work is
>>&g
Is sa-learn being run, and if so is it no longer effective?
On Sat, 10 Dec 2016, Karen Lewellen wrote:
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:46:19
From: Karen Lewellen
To: Cindy-Sue Causey
Cc: Debian Users
Subject: Re: spam filtering question?
Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 21:47:05 + (UTC)
Resent
Ubuntu.
For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no longer
filtering at the level it did previously.
Has something happened to the program ?
Is there a better spam filtering option for shell servers that I might
suggest to our administrator?
The Ubuntu distribution is in the 16
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:27:50PM -0500, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Greetings folks,
> shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work is
> using Ubuntu.
> For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no longer
> filtering at the level it
On 12/9/16, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> Greetings folks,
> shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work is
> using Ubuntu.
> For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no longer
> filtering at the level it did previously.
> Has somethi
no
> longer filtering at the level it did previously.
Hm. The question is far too unspecific. Spam itself changes pretty
quickly.
> Has something happened to the program ?
I'd rather venture that "spam" has changed, which itself is a very
broad statement: the kind of spam
Greetings folks,
shellworld.net the shell service where I do most of my internet work is
using Ubuntu.
For reasons that I find rather confusing spam assassin is well no longer
filtering at the level it did previously.
Has something happened to the program ?
Is there a better spam filtering
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 17:51:10 +0100
Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> On 31/08/16 13:33, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:21:13 +0100 Tony van der Hoff
> > wrote:
> >> So, I'd like to perform the filtering on the server (for my user
> >> i
ch as this one. I currently use
Thunderbird's filtering capability to sort mail into a number of
subdirectories within my inbox, which works fine, but requires me to set up
all my workstayions (laptop, home, work) with the same filters. I have now
acquired an Android smartphone, which has no
On 31/08/16 13:33, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:21:13 +0100 Tony van der Hoff
wrote:
So, I'd like to perform the filtering on the server (for my user
initially, then perhaps for others). My extensive googling reveals
that there are many tutorials for filtering spam
is one. I currently use
> Thunderbird's filtering capability to sort mail into a number of
> subdirectories within my inbox, which works fine, but requires me to set up
> all my workstayions (laptop, home, work) with the same filters. I have now
> acquired an Android smartphone, w
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:21:13 +0100 Tony van der Hoff
wrote:
> So, I'd like to perform the filtering on the server (for my user
> initially, then perhaps for others). My extensive googling reveals
> that there are many tutorials for filtering spam, but that's not
> really my
Hi list,
I'm running postfix under Wheezy on my VPS, using a more or less
out-of-the-box configuration. My users access their mail via IMAP.
I subscribe to a number of mail lists, such as this one. I currently use
Thunderbird's filtering capability to sort mail into a
On Mi, 05 mar 14, 11:46:23, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> mpop is _s_ much faster than fetchmail.
> Osamu recommends getmail, he's the maintainer too, and on this list,
> so a fine choice as fetchmail replacement. I have not used getmail - 3
> years ago I may have struggled with it and back then
On 3/5/14, Steve Litt of Troubleshooters.Com wrote:
> By the way, here's my email receiving system:
>
> http://www.troubleshooters.com/lpm/201202/images/dovecot_setup.png
> If you want to read the document that came from, it's here:
> http://www.troubleshooters.com/lpm/201202/201202.htm
Thank yo
Bret Busby grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2014, Steve Litt wrote:
>> [...]
>> I'll probably have to add more to that as he comes on line with a slew
>> of other identities, but .procmailrc is a pretty easy filtering
^
On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:38:17 +0800 (WST)
Bret Busby wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2014, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> > GARBAGE=/dev/null
> >
> > ### DEBIAN LIST UBERSCREAMER ARNOLD BIRD'S 4 ADDRESSES
> > :0:
> > * ^From.*naturalli...@dcemail.com
> > $GARBAGE
> >
> > :0:
> > * ^From.*arnoldb...@cosmicemail.c
> $GARBAGE
>>
>> :0:
>> * ^From.*fredw...@mail.ru
>> $GARBAGE
>> ==
>>
>>
>> I'll probably have to add more to that as he comes on line with a slew
>> of other identities, but .procma
s a pretty easy filtering
mechanism.
Life is more pleasant when you don't have to hear that stuff.
SteveT
Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance
Is that procmail, or is that postfix (or, sendmail)?
--
Bret Busby
Arm
Provided you can rely on gawk extensions, a coprocess [1] should help.
[1]
https://www.gnu.org/software/gawk/manual/gawk.html#Getline_002fCoprocess
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
A
Neal Murphy wrote:
> I don't see a way to pipe both ends of an external command. I'm not sure
> even *perl* could do that.
It can [*], see IPC::Open2 and IPC::Open3. But you can end up with all
sorts of buffer related race conditions.
Chris
--
[*] are you really surprised?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
.
Again, as I said, this is only
*for the sake of illustration of filtering through external command*.
I didn't want to complicate/distract the discussion on how to match a
piece of segment on a complicated XML string then beautify it via
external command tidy, then do further processing..., all wi
T o n g wrote:
...
> Any way to filter through external command to variable, somewhat like:
>
> head /etc/group | awk '{print $0 | "cut -d':' -f1" | getline result ;}'
>
looks like you want to assign the output of command to
a variable.
in shell or bash use the backquote character `
result=
On Friday, November 09, 2012 11:28:29 PM T o n g wrote:
> Any way to filter through external command to variable, somewhat like:
>
> head /etc/group | awk '{print $0 | "cut -d':' -f1" | getline result ;}'
>
> Any way to make it works?
You'd *think* there'd be a way to do that, but I don't think
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 04:28:29AM +, T o n g wrote:
>
> It's OK to:
>
> head /etc/group | awk '{print $0 | "cut -d':' -f1";}'
Why not:
head /etc/group | awk -F: '{print $1}'
>
> or,
>
> head /etc/group | awk '{ "echo " $0 | getline result ; print result}'
>
> Any way to filter throu
not getting it. Perhaps you could post a sample input with the
> desired output?
*For the sake of illustration of filtering through external command*:
It's OK to:
head /etc/group | awk '{print $0 | "cut -d':' -f1";}'
or,
head /etc/group | awk '{ &qu
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 03:47:15AM +, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Awk allows reading results from external command:
>
> cmd | getline result
Over in comp.lang.awk they will tell you to avoid using getline if at
all possible because it changes the way your program operates in ways
that are dif
Hi,
Awk allows reading results from external command:
cmd | getline result
However, I want the cmd itself a piping command as well. E.g..,
"echo " substr($0, RSTART, RLENGTH) | command external with parameters|
getline result
Any way to make it works?
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:14:57AM +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> lee:
> >
> > I've looked at formail + procmail , but formail forces it into mailbox
> > format which I dont want.
>
> Formail doesn't actually save the mailboxes anywhere, procmail does
> that. And if you append a slash to the mail
On 07/05/2012 09:59 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> lee wrote:
>> I've looked at formail + procmail , but formail forces it into mailbox
>> format which I dont want.
> With Maildir format you don't need formail. Just pipe each individual
> message to procmail.
>
> Of the top of my head and untested:
>
>
On 07/05/2012 02:41 PM, Jon Dowland wrote:
> You can run procmail in "filter mode" and pipe it each mail that you wish to
> filter individually, but you must keep track of which mails have been piped to
> procmail and remove them/mark them 'processed' yourself, via shell scripts
> etc.
>
> Make su
lee wrote:
> I've looked at formail + procmail , but formail forces it into mailbox
> format which I dont want.
With Maildir format you don't need formail. Just pipe each individual
message to procmail.
Of the top of my head and untested:
for m in Maildir/new/* Maildir/cur/*; do
procmail
You can run procmail in "filter mode" and pipe it each mail that you wish to
filter individually, but you must keep track of which mails have been piped to
procmail and remove them/mark them 'processed' yourself, via shell scripts etc.
Make sure your procmail recipe(s) deliver to a sensible locati
lee:
>
> I've looked at formail + procmail , but formail forces it into mailbox
> format which I dont want.
Formail doesn't actually save the mailboxes anywhere, procmail does
that. And if you append a slash to the mailbox name, procmail generates
maildirs. Example:
MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir/
LOGFIL
Hi.
probably not the best list to ask, but i've been trying and searching
for awhile now, with not much success. I'm looking for a way to run
my procmail filters on a directory containing emails I would like to
filter. I'm using a Maildir email directory setup.
I've looked at formail + procmail ,
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 03:41:02PM -0800, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> on 23:42 Fri 11 Mar, Joel Roth (jo...@pobox.com) wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 04:47:43PM -0800, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> > > I've been been using mutt + offlineimap for great justice ... exc
on 23:42 Fri 11 Mar, Joel Roth (jo...@pobox.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 04:47:43PM -0800, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> > I've been been using mutt + offlineimap for great justice ... except for
> > filtering.
> >
> > I've previously relied on procma
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 04:47:43PM -0800, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> I've been been using mutt + offlineimap for great justice ... except for
> filtering.
>
> I've previously relied on procmail for local rules management. While
> Gmail's rules are reasonably decent,
I've been been using mutt + offlineimap for great justice ... except for
filtering.
I've previously relied on procmail for local rules management. While
Gmail's rules are reasonably decent, not all IMAP providers are as
blessed.
I'd also like to trigger libnotify messages on
On 12/29/2010 09:12 AM, Vuki wrote:
Hi!
I have a postfix/dovecot mail server, i manage virtual domains via
postfixadmin and mysql.
How can i configure server side email filtering rules somehow(e.g. put
specified sender to a folder)?
vuki
hi vuki,
you can achieve this by using dovecot
Hi!
I have a postfix/dovecot mail server, i manage virtual domains via
postfixadmin and mysql.
How can i configure server side email filtering rules somehow(e.g. put
specified sender to a folder)?
vuki
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
should be easy to achieve by using anti-spam measures (SA,
> bogofilter) along with filtering actions (rules).
>
> Here there are some tips:
>
> http://maketecheasier.com/how-to-create-email-filters-with-kmail/2010/0
> 1/11 http://userbase.kde.org/KMail/Tools#Anti-Spam_Tools
On Friday 24 Dec 2010, Chris Davies wrote:
> To do this is straightforward if somewhat fiddly.
>
> - Enable junk/spam processing (I assume KMail can do this)
> - Create a filter for each of the known shops and mailing lists
Yes, I think this is essentially the Thunderbird approach. Each
accepta
hat e-mails
coming from selected users (in address book or by manually selection) is
"ham" (and never tagged as spam, kinda whitelisting in SA parlance).
This should be easy to achieve by using anti-spam measures (SA,
bogofilter) along with filtering actions (rules).
Here there are
Steve McCarthy wrote:
> Sorry I wasn't clearer. I believe the distinction is: SPAM is unsolicited
> whereas junk is solicited but unwanted at the present time. Stores you
> patronize or causes you support will all send you email which you may or
> may not want to read right now. Just like ju
On Thursday 23 Dec 2010, Lisi wrote:
> On Thursday 23 December 2010 21:48:26 Steve McCarthy wrote:
> > Has anyone else found a way to defer junk (not SPAM) mail in kmail?
>
> It can use Spamassassin. (It can integrate it.) But I don't
> understand the distinction between Spam and Junk.
>
> To w
On Thursday 23 December 2010 21:48:26 Steve McCarthy wrote:
> My GF's disk died and it seemed a perfect time to introduce her to
> linux/gnu and kde as a msft substitute. I was sadly mistaken.
>
> I chose kmail as a substitute for her thunderbird for several reasons. My
> problem now is duplicati
On Thursday 23 December 2010 21:48:26 Steve McCarthy wrote:
> Has anyone else found a way to defer junk (not SPAM) mail in kmail?
It can use Spamassassin. (It can integrate it.) But I don't understand the
distinction between Spam and Junk.
To which version of KMail are we referring? Or which
ntrol.
She gets dozens of messages that she wants to keep but peruse later. ice
owl’s junk folder approach separates friends from junk on receipt. I've
tried to duplicate this in kmail, but filtering on address book contents
appears to be broken.
Has anyone else found a way to defer junk
Michal schreef:
On 27/07/10 00:38, vr wrote:
What is a good utility to block outbound traffic on the home network?
Ideally it will not need to be set in a browsers proxy setting to be
effective.
Cheap old PC, two nics, stick OS of choice on, create firewall rules,
install squid, setup, us
On 27/07/10 00:38, vr wrote:
What is a good utility to block outbound traffic on the home network?
Ideally it will not need to be set in a browsers proxy setting to be
effective.
Cheap old PC, two nics, stick OS of choice on, create firewall rules,
install squid, setup, use this as your ne
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 09:39:08PM -0400, vr wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:09:44 -0400, "H.S." wrote:
> >
> > I am not familiar with ATT. Is your service ADSL or cable?
> >
>
> They call it VDSL.
>
> >
> > If your router does not have the features you desire, than you probably
> > need to r
And the various rules (for filtering or port forwarding or
> blocking) are also done using iptables.
>
> There are many applications that can be used to create the desired
> iptables rules. I use my own bash script. I am thinking of playing
> with a GUI option when I get some time. I
er is iptables with
ip_forwarding enabled (this makes the machine as a gateway router). And
the various rules (for filtering or port forwarding or blocking) are
also done using iptables.
There are many applications that can be used to create the desired
iptables rules. I use my own bash script. I
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:09:44 -0400, "H.S." wrote:
>
> I am not familiar with ATT. Is your service ADSL or cable?
>
They call it VDSL.
>
> If your router does not have the features you desire, than you probably
> need to replace it. It may be replaced with a Debian machine working as
> a rout
On 26/07/10 08:46 PM, vr wrote:
The service provider (ATT) provided a four port 2-Wire router that is both
wireless and wired.
I am not familiar with ATT. Is your service ADSL or cable?
It has very few options for firewalling and is required to connect to
their service.
I think I have used
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:26:29 -0400, "H.S." wrote:
> On 26/07/10 07:38 PM, vr wrote:
>> What is a good utility to block outbound traffic on the home network?
>> Ideally it will not need to be set in a browsers proxy setting to be
>> effective.
>>
>>
>
> You need to describe your network and the des
On 26/07/10 07:38 PM, vr wrote:
What is a good utility to block outbound traffic on the home network?
Ideally it will not need to be set in a browsers proxy setting to be
effective.
You need to describe your network and the desired control to get some
relevant answers. Without knowing these
On 07/26/2010 06:38 PM, vr wrote:
What is a good utility to block outbound traffic on the home network?
Ideally it will not need to be set in a browsers proxy setting to be
effective.
Your firewalling router?
Plz be more specific in your needs.
--
Seek truth from facts.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
What is a good utility to block outbound traffic on the home network?
Ideally it will not need to be set in a browsers proxy setting to be
effective.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ar
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 17:23 -0400, Yavuz Yetim wrote:
> I would like to list all packages installed from testing. How can I do
> that?
The following works pretty well:
dpkg -l | awk '/^.i/ {print $2}' | xargs apt-cache policy
| awk '/^[a-z0-9.\-]+:/ {pkg=$1}; /\*\*\*/ {OFS="\t"; ver=$2
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 06:19:36PM -0400, Andrew Reid wrote:
> On Sunday 14 March 2010 17:54:25 Freeman wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 05:23:11PM -0400, Yavuz Yetim wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to list all packages installed from testing. How can I do
> > > that? First limiting to
I tested both of apt-show-versions and aptitude limit approach. There
are differences. apt-show-versions shows which packages are installed
from what archive. The list aptitude shows is, the packages which are
installed and they exists in the given archive. apt-show-versions is
more like what I wan
On Sunday 14 March 2010 17:54:25 Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 05:23:11PM -0400, Yavuz Yetim wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to list all packages installed from testing. How can I do
> > that? First limiting to ~installed and then searching ~archive(testing)
> > gives me packages tha
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 05:08:32PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Ron Johnson writes:
> > I'm an apt-get guy, though, and it might not match the aptitude
> > database.
>
> Both apt-get and aptitude are front-ends for apt. There is no seperate
> aptitude database.
> --
So /var/lib/aptitude/pkgstate
On 2010-03-14 17:08, John Hasler wrote:
Ron Johnson writes:
I'm an apt-get guy, though, and it might not match the aptitude
database.
Both apt-get and aptitude are front-ends for apt. There is no seperate
aptitude database.
There was a time when you were recommended *not* to use them
inter
Ron Johnson writes:
> I'm an apt-get guy, though, and it might not match the aptitude
> database.
Both apt-get and aptitude are front-ends for apt. There is no seperate
aptitude database.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsub
Florian Kulzer skrev:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 17:23:11 -0400, Yavuz Yetim wrote:
If I understand you correctly then I think the "narrowing" search
pattern/operator is what you want:
aptitude search '~S ~i ~Atesting'
I thought so too, but when I tested, aptitude lists acpi as installed
fro
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 05:23:11PM -0400, Yavuz Yetim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to list all packages installed from testing. How can I do
> that? First limiting to ~installed and then searching ~archive(testing)
> gives me packages that are installed and available in testing and that's
> not w
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 17:23:11 -0400, Yavuz Yetim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to list all packages installed from testing. How can I do
> that? First limiting to ~installed and then searching ~archive(testing)
> gives me packages that are installed and available in testing and that's
> not wha
Yavuz Yetim skrev:
I would like to list all packages installed from testing. How can I do
that? First limiting to ~installed and then searching ~archive(testing)
gives me packages that are installed and available in testing and that's
not what I want.
I was going to suggest the command
aptit
On 2010-03-14 16:23, Yavuz Yetim wrote:
Hi,
I would like to list all packages installed from testing. How can I do
that? First limiting to ~installed and then searching ~archive(testing)
gives me packages that are installed and available in testing and that's
not what I want. For example, I have
Hi,
I would like to list all packages installed from testing. How can I do
that? First limiting to ~installed and then searching ~archive(testing)
gives me packages that are installed and available in testing and that's
not what I want. For example, I have evolution 2.22 from stable. So,
~installe
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 02:49:42PM -0800, Tudod Ki wrote:
> howtos like these:
> http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/25/add-antivirus-to-postfix-with-clamav/
> http://www.debianadmin.com/how-to-filter-spam-with-spamassassin-and-postfix-in-debian.html
> Will give me spam/virus filtering fo
On Monday 14 December 2009 08:16:44 Tudod Ki wrote:
> I think that these howtos filter only incoming emails [antispam&antivirus]
> is it true? :O
What does "incoming" mean? From the point of view of the MTA (postfix) every
external mail is "incoming" (either incoming from the Internet or incomin
I think that these howtos filter only incoming emails [antispam&antivirus]
is it true? :O
Thank You!
--- On Sun, 12/13/09, Tudod Ki wrote:
From: Tudod Ki
Subject: spam+virus filtering
To: "Debian User"
Date: Sunday, December 13, 2009, 10:49 PM
howtos like these:
http://www.ghac
If you are planning to do spam+antivirus filtering, let me suggest you
Amavisd-new to act as a "glue" for all the added services.
Postfix calls Amavisd-new and Amavisd-new calls both, SA and ClamAV and
then reinjects the mail into Postfix.
http://www200.pair.com/m
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:49:42 -0800, Tudod Ki wrote:
> howtos like these:
> http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/25/add-antivirus-to-postfix-with-clamav/
> http://www.debianadmin.com/how-to-filter-spam-with-spamassassin-and-
postfix-in-debian.html
> Will give me spam/virus filtering fo
howtos like these:
http://www.ghacks.net/2009/10/25/add-antivirus-to-postfix-with-clamav/
http://www.debianadmin.com/how-to-filter-spam-with-spamassassin-and-postfix-in-debian.html
Will give me spam/virus filtering for INBOUND or OUTBOUND mails? Or Both?
sorry for the question :D But I have to
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 11:40:26AM -0500, John W Foster wrote:
> all mail, so I would never get it in a download. I really don't want to
> mess with 'fetchmail, mutt, or any of the other possible means of
> solving this if I can locate a way to do what I want. I also don't want
> --
> John Foster
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 11:31 +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
> Hello,
>
> John W Foster writes:
>
> > I need to know how to keep gmail/ or maybe my own mailing list setting,
> > from filtering out replys to posting on debian user and other debian
> > lists.
>
Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
Hello,
John W Foster writes:
I need to know how to keep gmail/ or maybe my own mailing list setting,
from filtering out replys to posting on debian user and other debian
lists.
For this, I usually define a filter in the Gmail webui, to label
mailing-list
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 23:18 -0700, Jimmy Johnson wrote:
> John W Foster wrote:
> > I need to know how to keep gmail/ or maybe my own mailing list setting,
> > from filtering out replys to posting on debian user and other debian
> > lists.
> > scenario:
> > When I
On Mon,29.Jun.09, 18:51:54, John W Foster wrote:
> I need to know how to keep gmail/ or maybe my own mailing list setting,
> from filtering out replys to posting on debian user and other debian
> lists.
> scenario:
> When I post an answer or a questions to this list or any debian l
On Tue Jun 30, 2009 at 05:07:26 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Steve Kemp wrote:
>> Seriously this is way off-topic for the list.
>
> Yeah, you couldn't be more wrong on that.
If somebody :
* Fails to understand how their webmail works.
* Fails to use the available help.
* Ran
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve Kemp wrote:
Seriously this is way off-topic for the list.
Yeah, you couldn't be more wrong on that. I always giggle when
someone tries to declare something OT here. Lemme know how that works
out for you. ;)
Steve, Real men don't giggle. ;)
--
Jimmy John
Steve Kemp wrote:
Seriously this is way off-topic for the list.
Yeah, you couldn't be more wrong on that. I always giggle when someone
tries to declare something OT here. Lemme know how that works out for you. ;)
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who can decide what they dream
Daryl Styrk writes:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:31:56AM +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>>
>> For this, I usually define a filter in the Gmail webui, to label
>> mailing-list incoming or outgoing posts.
>>
>> In the present case, in the 'Has the words' field, I entered:
>>
>> "list:debian-use
On Tue Jun 30, 2009 at 07:05:36 -0400, Daryl Styrk wrote:
> > This way, when I receive or send messages from/to the list, they are
> > _all_ labelled as "debian-user", including the one stored in "Sent
> > Mail". This works well, for me at least.
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> How do you access your
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:31:56AM +0200, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote:
>
> For this, I usually define a filter in the Gmail webui, to label
> mailing-list incoming or outgoing posts.
>
> In the present case, in the 'Has the words' field, I entered:
>
> "list:debian-user.lists.debian.org OR to:debian
1 - 100 of 563 matches
Mail list logo
