On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 08:22 -0400, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2015, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
>
> > dpkg-reconfigure ?
>
> I wonder: could you be a bit more verbose as to how
> you think I might use that command?
>
> Thanks!
Hi,
Probably something chang
On Thu, 21 May 2015, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote:
dpkg-reconfigure ?
I wonder: could you be a bit more verbose as to how
you think I might use that command?
Thanks!
--
These are not the droids you are looking for.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
nce to the Kernel Gods.
>
> My spidey sense is tingling the way it almost always does when I
> try to foist off on a list a question I know must be a FAQ, but
> there you have it, nevertheless, as they say.
>
> But, may I have my console font back, please?
>
> (I hav
en I
try to foist off on a list a question I know must be a FAQ, but
there you have it, nevertheless, as they say.
But, may I have my console font back, please?
(I have Jessie amd64 here.)
--
Bob Bernstein
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.d
Hi everyone,
after upgrading from Wheezy to Jessie on my imac g3 the font rendering
in Gtk+ applications is distorted. The fonts are mostly unreadable. This
affects Gtk2 and Gtk3 but not Qt applications. I reinstalled the whole
system twice freshly. but the problem persists.
I want to file
Rodolfo Medina writes:
> I'm having troubles with ps files generated by Emacs ps-print package -
> footers are partially cut off. Is it possibile that some environment
> variable causes the weird? And how can I know (and work it out)?
The problem is worked out simply changing
On Monday 23 February 2015 04:59:50 pm Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > >
> > > https://www.trinitydesktop.org/
> > >
> > > It is the direct descendant of KDE3. The letters KDE do not appear in
> > > the name because of trademark issues with KDE4.
> > >
> > > Lisi
> >
> > Looks interesting Lisi, so much so
On Monday 23 February 2015 21:54:40 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday, February 23, 2015 03:57:04 PM Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Monday 23 February 2015 20:40:09 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Monday, February 23, 2015 01:32:07 PM Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > > On Monday 23 February 2015 13:50:24 Gene Heskett
On Monday, February 23, 2015 03:57:04 PM Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 23 February 2015 20:40:09 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Monday, February 23, 2015 01:32:07 PM Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > On Monday 23 February 2015 13:50:24 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > Is there a solution to this short of switching to
On Monday 23 February 2015 20:40:09 Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday, February 23, 2015 01:32:07 PM Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Monday 23 February 2015 13:50:24 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > Is there a solution to this short of switching to claws?
> >
> > Would it be possible for you to go back to using KM
On Monday, February 23, 2015 01:32:07 PM Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 23 February 2015 13:50:24 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Is there a solution to this short of switching to claws?
>
> Would it be possible for you to go back to using KMail 1.9.10? I don't
> know whether the emails and folders would
On Monday 23 February 2015 13:50:24 Gene Heskett wrote:
> Is there a solution to this short of switching to claws?
Would it be possible for you to go back to using KMail 1.9.10? I don't know
whether the emails and folders would be able to be taken backwards. But you
obviously used to like the
, where the p is
backspaced and overprinted at the left edge of the 7, and the 1 is
overprinted half a space to the right of the center of the 7. So its an
unreadable mess.
The message window has another font problem, the font is stuck, looks
exactly like what I am seeing in this composer window
On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 03:02:03 +, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I cannot get chrome or chromium (or Iceweaasel either) to print a web
> page in a twelve-point font on my laser printer. It insists on using a
> font that's about twice the size.
Well, let me apologize for even posting tha
I cannot get chrome or chromium (or Iceweaasel either) to print a web
page in a twelve-point font on my laser printer. It insists on using a
font that's about twice the size.
It even ignores my explicit request to set font-size in the css file:
@media print{
account-tree{
di
On Thu 11 Sep 2014 at 15:57:28 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 11 Sep 2014 at 15:31:40 +0200, Siard wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:17:02 +0100, Brian wrote:
> > > On Wed 10 Sep 2014 at 10:20:39 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> > > > When I turn off the option "ignore scale and reduce to paper
On Thu 11 Sep 2014 at 15:31:40 +0200, Siard wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:17:02 +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 10 Sep 2014 at 10:20:39 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> > > When I turn off the option "ignore scale and reduce to paper
> > > size" (free translation) in the print options, the probl
Paul van der Vlis:
> Siard:
> > In iceweasel and seamonkey, using the same gtk print dialog, it is
> > also possible to set this default in about:config.
>
> In Icedove you can reach this with "preferences | advanced |
> configuration editor".
Ah! That is, indeed, another method to set this opti
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:17:02 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 10 Sep 2014 at 10:20:39 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> > When I turn off the option "ignore scale and reduce to paper
> > size" (free translation) in the print options, the problem is gone,
> > but I have to do that every time, I don't kn
op 10-09-14 21:00, Siard schreef:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:17:02 +0100, Brian wrote:
>> On Wed 10 Sep 2014 at 10:20:39 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>>
>>> I've tested it with 2 different printers (HP, Samsung).
>>>
>>> When I turn off the option "ignore scale and reduce to paper
>>> size" (free
On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 17:17:02 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 10 Sep 2014 at 10:20:39 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>
> > I've tested it with 2 different printers (HP, Samsung).
> >
> > When I turn off the option "ignore scale and reduce to paper
> > size" (free translation) in the print options, t
On Wed 10 Sep 2014 at 10:20:39 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> I've tested it with 2 different printers (HP, Samsung).
>
> When I turn off the option "ignore scale and reduce to paper size" (free
> translation) in the print options, the problem is gone, but I have to do
> that every time, I don
Hello,
I've a problem with printing from Icedove. Some mails are printed with
very small fonts, so you cannot read them.
In my opinion the problem occurs when there is a long URL in a mail from
some mailclients, something like:
https://www.google.com/search?q=hele+lange+url&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t
On Thu, 22 May 2014, john s. wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:34:21AM -0400, john s. wrote:
How can I increase the size of the console font?
This is a new install without no desktop ie. just the base installion
so we're talking about the font in the vt (virtual terminal).
do you hav
On Thu, 22 May 2014 16:10:08 -0400
"john s." wrote:
> On Thu, 22 May 2014 16:06:47 +0200
> Francesco Ariis wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:34:21AM -0400, john s. wrote:
> > > How can I increase the size of the console font?
> > >
>
On Thu, 22 May 2014 14:19:24 + (UTC)
Curt wrote:
> On 2014-05-22, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:34:21AM -0400, john s. wrote:
> >> How can I increase the size of the console font?
> >>
> >
> > It depends on your terminal
On Thu, 22 May 2014 16:06:47 +0200
Francesco Ariis wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:34:21AM -0400, john s. wrote:
> > How can I increase the size of the console font?
> >
>
> It depends on your terminal emulator. I suppose it's gnome-terminal.
>
On 2014-05-22, Francesco Ariis wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:34:21AM -0400, john s. wrote:
>> How can I increase the size of the console font?
>>
>
> It depends on your terminal emulator. I suppose it's gnome-terminal.
> Can you check and report back?
>
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:34:21AM -0400, john s. wrote:
> How can I increase the size of the console font?
>
It depends on your terminal emulator. I suppose it's gnome-terminal.
Can you check and report back?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
How can I increase the size of the console font?
--
John Song - via Penguin Powered Desktop.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.
On Fri, 16 May 2014 00:29:22 +0600
Muntasim Ul Haque wrote:
> Also, is there any better alternative to Infinality for Debian. I
> want better font rendering. The default font rendering is bad. Also
> changing the anti-aliasing and other doesn't make a big difference.
>
>
Thanks everyone. Look like it worked.
Muntasim-Ul-Haque
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52b269a3.2000...@inventati.org
As other said, you can use the fonts settings in Xfce, but if you have
an LCD monitor you should also do (as root or with sudo):
ln -s /etc/fonts/conf.avail/11-lcdfilter-default.conf /etc/fonts/conf.d/
Better you do this before anything, then logout and login (or reboot)
and then you can set the
To get better font rendering in Xfce in Settings - Appearance - Fonts:
-- Check the box to "enable anti-aliasing"
-- make it "Hinting: Full"
--
Steven Rosenberg
http://stevenrosenberg.net/blog
http://blogs.dailynews.com/click
stevenhrosenb...@gmail.com
ste...@stevenrosenberg.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 04:28:01PM +0600, Muntasim-Ul-Haque wrote:
> Hi,
> Fonts is Debian Wheezy XFCE does not look good. I'm not comparing
> the font rendering with other distros but I have to make it better
> and clearer. How to make fonts look great in Debian Wheezy XFCE?
>
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 16:28 +0600, Muntasim-Ul-Haque wrote:
> How to make fonts look great in [...] XFCE?
Menu -> Settings -> Settings Manager -> Appearance -> Fonts
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@l
Hi,
Fonts is Debian Wheezy XFCE does not look good. I'm not comparing the
font rendering with other distros but I have to make it better and
clearer. How to make fonts look great in Debian Wheezy XFCE? What's the
way out?
With thanks,
Muntasim-Ul-Haque
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
OK, I removed the no-bitmaps.conf x11 symlink and restarted X.
Now eg
xterm -fn 6x10 -fa ""
works as advertised to give me normal xterm bitmap font.
However, my custom xterm bitmap font, which I access by:
xterm -fa Zen
produces an xterm with my custom font, but a very/extra- large spa
Hi,
I have used nvidia cards before. I decided to try radeon because reputed better
support :(
I tried the radeon driver.
in X got only duplicate copies of the same screen on both monitors.
xrandr only reported a single Screen stanza.
However what is nice is that with radeon during boot up to c
On 10/30/13, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/8/13, Nick Croft wrote:
>> * Zenaan Harkness (z...@freedbms.net) wrote:
>>> So I've customized fixed-misc 6x10 font to create fixed-zen-6x10 font
>>> and xfontsel does not show my font.
>>>
>>> Of
On 9/8/13, Nick Croft wrote:
> * Zenaan Harkness (z...@freedbms.net) wrote:
>> So I've customized fixed-misc 6x10 font to create fixed-zen-6x10 font
>> and xfontsel does not show my font.
>>
>> Of course, I want to load an xterm with my funky font changes.
>&
On 9/18/13, Darac Marjal wrote:
> Either would suggest to me a lost/corrupt file...
Your careful (quite impressive, actually) reply encouraged me to
inspect my collection of font files. I noticed a discrepancy between:
/etc/X11/fonts/misc/xfonts-base.alias
and
/usr/share/fonts/X11/m
etely hiccup-free, performance!
Presumably (this being UNINTERRUPTED performance), you've not done any
updates recently? So that would imply that either the font is no longer
there, or the method tightvncserver uses to find it is broken.
Either would suggest to me a lost/corrupt file - check yo
On Tuesday 17 September 2013 22:08:09 Eric d'Halibut wrote:
> On 9/16/13, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > Why does the fact that you have failing eyes necessitate having a font in
> > the form above?
>
> It doesn't. That was the form in which the recommended font was
> s
On 9/16/13, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Why does the fact that you have failing eyes necessitate having a font in
> the form above?
It doesn't. That was the form in which the recommended font was
specified to me by an online friend.
> I have failing eyes and I find Bitstream Vera Sans
else I suppose, I have many fixed width fonts
on this machine. How would a fontpath indicate a "default font fixed".
Best,
--
No no no, my fish's name is Eric, Eric the fish. He's an halibut. I am
not a looney! Why should I be tarred with the epithet looney merely
because I
On 2013-09-16, Eric d'Halibut wrote:
>
> None of the new fonts show up in xfontsel, and I know of no other way
> to get the name of a font in the form of the example I gave at the
> outset, shown above.
xset fp rehash
Perhaps.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...
Eric d'Halibut wrote at 2013-09-15 22:51 -0500:
> Thank you. I installed these three:
>
> > - fontmatrix (if you want a tool to compare fonts)
> > - fonts-liberation (Liberation Mono font)
> > - ttf-bitstream-vera (Bitstream Vera Sans Mono font)
>
> None of the
On Monday 16 September 2013 04:51:49 Eric d'Halibut wrote:
> On 9/15/13, green wrote:
> > Eric d'Halibut wrote at 2013-09-15 20:57 -0500:
> >> The following was suggested to me for use as a fairly big font for my
> >> failing eyes.
> >>
> >
On 9/15/13, green wrote:
> Eric d'Halibut wrote at 2013-09-15 20:57 -0500:
>> The following was suggested to me for use as a fairly big font for my
>> failing eyes.
>> -adobe-courier-bold-r-normal--33-240-100-100-m-200-iso10646-1
> Several Courier-style font
Eric d'Halibut wrote at 2013-09-15 20:57 -0500:
> The following was suggested to me for use as a fairly big font for my
> failing eyes.
>
> -adobe-courier-bold-r-normal--33-240-100-100-m-200-iso10646-1
>
> Is there a method that would backtrack me to the deb contain
The following was suggested to me for use as a fairly big font for my
failing eyes.
-adobe-courier-bold-r-normal--33-240-100-100-m-200-iso10646-1
Is there a method that would backtrack me to the deb containing that font?
Best as per usual!
--
No no no, my fish's name is Eric, Eric the
So I've customized fixed-misc 6x10 font to create fixed-zen-6x10 font
(eg put a dot in the zero), using fontforge, and the "howto" at:
http://weiwu.sdf.org/100921.html
I made my font changes,
set a font name,
added ascent and descent params,
encoding is iso-10646,
save
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:20:55 +0200
Alois Mahdal wrote:
> [...]
>
> I'm surprised by the fact that PuTTY fails with this error
> now:
>
> PuTTY: unable to load font "server:terminus-12"
I forgot to make it clear that this does not happen everytime,
only w
PuTTY: unable to load font "server:terminus-12"
I haven't yet installed all fonts I used to have in Wheezy, but
aren't the "server:" fonts supposed to be downloaded from
server (where I'm sure no relevant upgrade took place)?
PuTTY is 0.62-11 in Jessie, was 0.6
On Thursday 30 May 2013 15:10:17 Sladjan Ri wrote:
> I am trying to use a bitmap font, but it has overlapping characters in
> the console in X.
> http://s21.postimg.org/leqlgxoyv/Capture.png
I have sometimes had that problem with the virtual terminal when using LXDE.
Most irritating
Hi, I am trying to use a bitmap font, but it has overlapping characters in
the console in X.
http://s21.postimg.org/leqlgxoyv/Capture.png
My ~./fonts.config looks like this:
http://pastebin.com/P8qVZmYG
How can I fix this please?
Regards,
Sladi
T o n g writes:
> I believe emacs is now built with GTK rather than Lucid
thumper/~ apt-cache show emacs24-lucid
Package: emacs24-lucid
Source: emacs24
Version: 24.3+1-1
Installed-Size: 16982
Maintainer: Rob Browning
Architecture: amd64
Replaces: emacs24, emacs24-nox
Provides: editor, emacs24, em
Hi,
>From a certain point of time that I can't remember, emacs started to use
gtk style of menus. It didn't bother me until now, because the font size
is so big that it distort my emacs window shape.
Anyone know how to set the emacs' gtk menu font & size?
I believe e
Your mail reader. It's just a rule built into it. BTW, -delete- does not
show up specially in icedove.
HTML is another story, it has tags.
On 01/04/2013 11:56 AM, lina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What makes the *bold* bold? and -delete- delete.
>
> I can't google it out about it? just curious, thanks.
-
Darac Marjal wrote at 2013-01-04 04:43 -0600:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:56:12PM +0800, lina wrote:
> > What makes the *bold* bold? and -delete- delete.
> >
> > I can't google it out about it? just curious, thanks.
>
> That would be your mail client interpreting the markup. The best
> documenta
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:56:12PM +0800, lina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What makes the *bold* bold? and -delete- delete.
>
> I can't google it out about it? just curious, thanks.
That would be your mail client interpreting the markup. The best
documentation I can find for it at the moment is:
http://kb.
Hi,
What makes the *bold* bold? and -delete- delete.
I can't google it out about it? just curious, thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e6a73c.2
Camaleón,
> JFYI, I also get the same behaviour in Lenny (64-bits) and Thunderbird
> 15.0.1; Cantarell font seems to be rendered almost touching the baseline.
Ok thanks for confirming I'm not the only one!
> I would ask at the Thunderbird forums or write a bug report in Debia
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:20:49 +0200, Pascal Obry wrote:
(...)
> Question... Is that only me or do someone have this same problem? And if
> so is there a way to fix this?
JFYI, I also get the same behaviour in Lenny (64-bits) and Thunderbird
15.0.1; Cantarell font seems to be rendered
Hi,
Since my first steps with Gnome Shell (3.0 in Debian experimental
branch) I can't use the Cantarell font because it is not properly
rendered under Icedove. I have this problem only with Icedove AFAICT. I
have retested today and still have the same problem.
I have referenced belo
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:37:36 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:59:11 +0200, lee wrote:
>>
>>> Camaleón writes:
>>>
>>>> TrueType fonts can be simply copied/pasted into one of the available
>>>> font
Camaleón writes:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:59:11 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> Camaleón writes:
>>
>>> TrueType fonts can be simply copied/pasted into one of the available
>>> font path folders and that should be all.
>>
>> It isn't that simple.
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:59:11 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>> TrueType fonts can be simply copied/pasted into one of the available
>> font path folders and that should be all.
>
> It isn't that simple.
It is for the majority of applications.
>
Camaleón writes:
> TrueType fonts can be simply copied/pasted into one of the available font
> path folders and that should be all.
It isn't that simple. With what you can get from dpkg-reconfigure
fontconfig-config, the fonts don't look too great and they look really
awful
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 19:44:17 +, T o n g wrote:
> It's been generations since I last play with X and defoma. Is defoma
> still the recommended way of configuring TrueType fonts? I noticed that
> defoma's font path is not in my Xorg. Is there any modern way to "slip&q
On Sat 08 Sep 2012 at 19:44:17 +, T o n g wrote:
> It's been generations since I last play with X and defoma.
You may need to get a move on if it is still your intention.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651494
Even now it may be too late. But snapshot.debian.org is alwa
Hi,
It's been generations since I last play with X and defoma.
Is defoma still the recommended way of configuring TrueType fonts?
I noticed that defoma's font path is not in my Xorg. Is there any modern
way to "slip" it in without touching the xorg.conf, using xorg.conf.
On Wed, 01 Aug 2012 22:02:43 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> for a few months now I have some artifacts that mysteriously appear and
> disappear on my gnome desktop:
>
> http://www2.inf.fh-brs.de/~fnatte2s/font_rendering.png
Sorry, but can't load the above URI:
sm01@stt008:~$ LANG=C wget www2.in
On 2012-08-01 22:02 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> for a few months now I have some artifacts that mysteriously appear and
> disappear on my gnome desktop:
See http://bugs.debian.org/666468 and its two dozen duplicates.
> Maybe this is related: When I do a "apt-get upgrade", *many* packages
> are
hello,
for a few months now I have some artifacts that mysteriously appear and
disappear on my gnome desktop:
http://www2.inf.fh-brs.de/~fnatte2s/font_rendering.png
Maybe this is related: When I do a "apt-get upgrade", *many* packages
are held back:
The following packages have been kept back:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Camale?n wrote:
http://xdialog.free.fr/
Remarks regarding some distributions quirks:
Wow... not a Debian lover here :-P
yes, and In My Holy Opinion, stupid...
If the font are broken, how comes that they are displayed correctly
(good shape and size), with the
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 20:51:37 +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Camale?n wrote:
>
>> Could it be because the kind of widget you are using (--msgbox) does
>> not allow the font property to be changed? I would try with the exact
>> example used in the FAQ.
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Camale?n wrote:
Could it be because the kind of widget you are using (--msgbox) does not
allow the font property to be changed? I would try with the exact example
used in the FAQ.
I actually tried with --textbox, and the rc-file given in the example:
Xdialog --rc-file
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:14:44 +0200, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> I would like to change the size of the font used by Xdialog. The
> --fontsel option gives a wide choice, but after that, I found no way the
> its output.
> I wrote the following bigfont.rc file
>
> style '
hi,
I would like to change the size of the font used by Xdialog.
The --fontsel option gives a wide choice, but after that, I found no
way the its output.
I wrote the following bigfont.rc file
style 'big_font' {
fg[NORMAL] = { 1.0, 1.0, 1.0 }
bg[NORMAL] = { 0.0, 0.0, 1.0 }
d will be sincerely
>>> appreciated.
>>>
>> Can you upload a snapshot for both displays so we can compare?
>>
>> My guess is that you may have configured a different font hinting or
>> rendering for each computer. Font appearance can be fine tweaked fro
soles /dev/tty1 thru /dev/tty6?
What resolution, refresh etc do you run these at?
> but the window surround is nearly unreadable on the old system.
.._only_ blurry text, or _both_ blurry text and xterm etc window
frame etc graphics?
..in the former case, read the other guys advice o
as to how this problem can be corrected will be sincerely
> appreciated.
Can you upload a snapshot for both displays so we can compare?
My guess is that you may have configured a different font hinting or
rendering for each computer. Font appearance can be fine tweaked from
"System
ake an ass out of you and me…) that this has something to
do with anti aliasing enabled on one system and disabled on the
other. Maybe you can have a look at the font properties of KDE and
compare these between the two desktops?
For XFCE 4.8, this would be achieved via the ‘Fonts’ tab in
xfce4-appearance-
Hi
I have two systems running Debian Squeeze and have essentially the same
setup. I am running an ATI Radeon HD 5450 on my main system which has
good readable print on both the desktop icons and on the bottom panel.
My other system (older) is running an ATI Radeon RV250 and has lousy
readabil
On 12/30/2011 01:47 AM, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 19:55:23 -0800, Joseph Loo wrote:
I have just installed Debian Squeeze. I have replaced the open office
package with Libre Office 3.4.3. I am trying to use the URW Bookman L
font. I have the bold, italic, and the bold italic
behavior of display
when given no argument whatsoever (still complaining about the
font it saw earlier?).
(I didn't know jpegs had fonts in them. I thought they were just
"images" of things. What's a font, anyway? I thought fonts were for/in
text).
But that's weird, isn&
On 31/12/11 04:17, Curt wrote:
> On 2011-12-29, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm guessing the pdf was built using that font.
>
> "display" (with no argument whatsoever) was giving me the font warning
> and the app would not open at all. This after
On 2011-12-29, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
>
> I'm guessing the pdf was built using that font.
"display" (with no argument whatsoever) was giving me the font warning
and the app would not open at all. This after trying to open a jpeg file
and getting that same warning. Appar
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 19:55:23 -0800, Joseph Loo wrote:
> I have just installed Debian Squeeze. I have replaced the open office
> package with Libre Office 3.4.3. I am trying to use the URW Bookman L
> font. I have the bold, italic, and the bold italic. The non-bold &
> non
I have just installed Debian Squeeze. I have replaced the open office
package with Libre Office 3.4.3. I am trying to use the URW Bookman L
font. I have the bold, italic, and the bold italic. The non-bold &
non-italic are both missing.
I have TeXLive: Recommended fonts installed
--
Joseph L
On Jo, 29 dec 11, 10:34:43, Curt wrote:
> Running squeeze. The display command (ImageMagick) gives the following
> warning (the app will not open at all):
>
> display: unable to load font
> `-microsoft-verdana-*-r-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*': Resource temporarily
> unavai
Running squeeze. The display command (ImageMagick) gives the following
warning (the app will not open at all):
display: unable to load font
`-microsoft-verdana-*-r-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*': Resource temporarily
unavailable @ error/xwindow.c/XBestFont/825.
xdpf says :
Warning: Cannot convert s
After a restart of my vserver, problem occurs again ...
Webkeepass use Jakarta-tomcat 5.5.7, in others web apache pages,
characters are displayed fine.
don't know are to search, if anyone can guide us,
thanks by advance,
Olivier
2011/11/13 Olivier BATARD :
> Resolved after a dpkg-reconfigure l
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 09:19 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> E.g. the Window of Tweak Advanced Settings can't be enlarged, so there
> seems to be a limit for the allowed size of the used font.
>
> I'm using DejaVu Sans Book 12 and this seems to be the limit, since some
> bor
Resolved after a dpkg-reconfigure locale AND a vserver restart.
Thanks !
Le 2 nov. 2011 à 16:33, Camaleón a écrit :
> On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:54:17 +0100, Olivier BATARD wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>
> Hi... please, keep text based formatted messages because html code
> renders very badly on some e-mail
On Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:54:17 +0100, Olivier BATARD wrote:
> Hi,
Hi... please, keep text based formatted messages because html code
renders very badly on some e-mail readers :-)
> I've just stop a squeeze server with a standard vserver kernel.
>
> So I want to use a vserver to host the webkeepa
Hi,
I've just stop a squeeze server with a standard vserver kernel.
So I want to use a vserver to host the webkeepass tool, which uses a tomcat
server.
Everything works fine when I use webkeepass on the main server, the display
is alright in French.
But When I use it in a verser with same param
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:25:55 +0200, Stanisław Findeisen wrote:
> I am having a PostScript (.ps) document that I am trying to convert to
> PDF. I am using ps2pdf for that, but the result looks bad: some glyphs
> are smaller than others, etc.
What fonts are used in the original PS file? And what fo
401 - 500 of 2528 matches
Mail list logo
