Steve Matzura wrote:
> The following is specific to Ubuntu 24.04. If it should go to a
> Ubuntu-specific list, let me know and I'll find out how to make that happen.
Yup. This is a list for Debian users.
> The problem is also related to FTP, which I can't seem to get working
e and
password, but the new system was installed by its provider with that
turned off, necessitating some fancy footwork with SSH keys and such.
The problem is also related to FTP, which I can't seem to get working. I
modified /etc/ssh/sshd_config by adding a section at the bottom for
&
Is there any FTP repository that holds all the current Jessie man page
files in one location?
I have tried various scripts and wget to extract man pages from
https://manpages.debian.org/jessie/ but my scripting ability lacks somewhat.
Jeremy
On 2021-02-17 04:53, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Ma, 16 feb 21, 16:45:13, Gary Dale wrote:
I hear you, but the issue is that if I revert to a previous version, then I
have to hold it to stop the buggy version from clobbering it every day. And
I have to monitor the Testing version for changes to see
On 2021-02-16 17:02, Philip Wyett wrote:
On Tue, 2021-02-16 at 16:45 -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
On 2021-02-13 03:02, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Vi, 12 feb 21, 17:00:41, Gary Dale wrote:
Which is why I think it would be useful to have way to rollback a
package
when you can't fix it quickly. That way
On Ma, 16 feb 21, 16:45:13, Gary Dale wrote:
>
> I hear you, but the issue is that if I revert to a previous version, then I
> have to hold it to stop the buggy version from clobbering it every day. And
> I have to monitor the Testing version for changes to see when a fix is
> potentially availabl
On 2021-02-13 03:02, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Vi, 12 feb 21, 17:00:41, Gary Dale wrote:
Which is why I think it would be useful to have way to rollback a package
when you can't fix it quickly. That way you aren't asking all the users to
do it themselves and track the bug status individually. Whe
On Tue, 2021-02-16 at 16:45 -0500, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 2021-02-13 03:02, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Vi, 12 feb 21, 17:00:41, Gary Dale wrote:
> > > Which is why I think it would be useful to have way to rollback a
> > > package
> > > when you can't fix it quickly. That way you aren't asking all
Op 13-02-2021 om 14:56 schreef songbird:
Frank wrote:
Op 12-02-2021 om 22:18 schreef Gary Dale:
...
I can do the same with Dolphin but I find it clumsy. FileZIlla is made
to let you transfer files between local and remote directories.
That's exactly what I do with caja, either from one tab t
Frank wrote:
> Op 12-02-2021 om 22:18 schreef Gary Dale:
...
>> I can do the same with Dolphin but I find it clumsy. FileZIlla is made
>> to let you transfer files between local and remote directories.
>>
> That's exactly what I do with caja, either from one tab to the other or
> between separate w
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
...
> Debian doesn't support downgrading of packages.
>
> When dpkg installs another version of a package (typically newer) it=20
> basically overwrites the existing version and runs the corresponding=20
> package scripts from the to be installed version.
>
> A newer package m
Op 12-02-2021 om 22:18 schreef Gary Dale:
On 2021-02-12 14:12, Frank wrote:
Op 12-02-2021 om 18:19 schreef Gary Dale:
I appreciate the people doing this, but this is a serious issue. I have
to resort to firing up a VM or resorting to the command line on my local
server to update my web sites be
On Vi, 12 feb 21, 17:00:41, Gary Dale wrote:
>
> Which is why I think it would be useful to have way to rollback a package
> when you can't fix it quickly. That way you aren't asking all the users to
> do it themselves and track the bug status individually. When the maintainers
> think they have a
On 2021-02-12 16:10, songbird wrote:
Gary Dale wrote:
...
I appreciate the people doing this, but this is a serious issue. I have
to resort to firing up a VM or resorting to the command line on my local
server to update my web sites because I can't do it from Testing. I see
it also impacts other
On 2021-02-12 14:15, Paul Scott wrote:
On 2/12/21 12:12 PM, Frank wrote:
Op 12-02-2021 om 18:19 schreef Gary Dale:
I appreciate the people doing this, but this is a serious issue. I have
to resort to firing up a VM or resorting to the command line on my
local
server to update my web sites be
On 2021-02-12 14:12, Frank wrote:
Op 12-02-2021 om 18:19 schreef Gary Dale:
I appreciate the people doing this, but this is a serious issue. I have
to resort to firing up a VM or resorting to the command line on my local
server to update my web sites because I can't do it from Testing.
What fil
On 2021-02-12 09:12, songbird wrote:
Gary Dale wrote:
...
Time passes and the bug is still in Debian/Testing.
please look at the end of:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980119
it looks like things are happening, but how quickly those
changes are applied and uploa
Gary Dale wrote:
...
> I appreciate the people doing this, but this is a serious issue. I have
> to resort to firing up a VM or resorting to the command line on my local
> server to update my web sites because I can't do it from Testing. I see
> it also impacts other programs that I (fortunately
Op 12-02-2021 om 20:15 schreef Paul Scott:
On 2/12/21 12:12 PM, Frank wrote:
Op 12-02-2021 om 18:19 schreef Gary Dale:
I appreciate the people doing this, but this is a serious issue. I have
to resort to firing up a VM or resorting to the command line on my local
server to update my web sites b
Greg Wooledge wrote:
...
> First of all, let's be clear: the bug (#980119) affects "FTP over TLS"
> a.k.a. "FTPS" which is a hacked-up abomination of a protocol on top of
> the worst protocol ever conceived.
>
> Anyone actually using this needs to take som
On 2/12/21 12:12 PM, Frank wrote:
Op 12-02-2021 om 18:19 schreef Gary Dale:
I appreciate the people doing this, but this is a serious issue. I have
to resort to firing up a VM or resorting to the command line on my local
server to update my web sites because I can't do it from Testing.
What f
Op 12-02-2021 om 18:19 schreef Gary Dale:
I appreciate the people doing this, but this is a serious issue. I have
to resort to firing up a VM or resorting to the command line on my local
server to update my web sites because I can't do it from Testing.
What file manager do you use?
I stopped us
st of all, let's be clear: the bug (#980119) affects "FTP over TLS"
a.k.a. "FTPS" which is a hacked-up abomination of a protocol on top of
the worst protocol ever conceived.
Anyone actually using this needs to take some time and seriously
re-evaluate their infrastructure.
Gary Dale wrote:
...
> Time passes and the bug is still in Debian/Testing.
please look at the end of:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980119
it looks like things are happening, but how quickly those
changes are applied and uploads happen and are approved may
take some
filed via GNUTLS:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980119
not sure what progress is actually being made.
I note that the problem affects all ftp client's I've tried under
testing but not the ones in the stable release. It's been weeks since
I first reported th
filed via GNUTLS:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980119
not sure what progress is actually being made.
I note that the problem affects all ftp client's I've tried under
testing but not the ones in the stable release. It's been weeks since
I first reported
progress is actually being made.
songbird
I note that the problem affects all ftp client's I've tried under
testing but not the ones in the stable release. It's been weeks since I
first reported this issue yet it still remains.
i see there is a bug filed via GNUTLS:
> >
> >https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980119
> >
> >not sure what progress is actually being made.
> >
> I note that the problem affects all ftp client's I've tried under
> testing but not th
Philip Wyett wrote:
...
> As stated in other mails. This is why their is stable/production and we
> should rely on those and not testing. ;-)
yes, of course. :) why i keep a booting stable partition
handy.
songbird
On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 10:44 -0500, songbird wrote:
> Gary Dale wrote:
> ...
>
> the problem is still there with the recent version of Filezilla
> that showed up in testing (3.52.0.5-1).
>
>
> i see there is a bug filed via GNUTLS:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=9801
Gary Dale wrote:
...
the problem is still there with the recent version of Filezilla
that showed up in testing (3.52.0.5-1).
i see there is a bug filed via GNUTLS:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980119
not sure what progress is actually being made.
songbird
rror:Failed to retrieve directory listing
at which point the connection seems to be severed by FileZilla.
When I try a command line ftp session, I also find that I cannot
do
an
"ls" after logging in.
However I can connect from my server which is running
Debian/Buster.
Something see
ion
Error:GnuTLS error -15: An unexpected TLS packet was received.
Error:The data connection could not be established:
ECONNABORTED
-
Connection aborted
Response:226 72 matches total
Error:Failed to retrieve directory listing
at which point the connection seems to be severed by FileZil
not be established: ECONNABORTED
-
Connection aborted
Response:226 72 matches total
Error:Failed to retrieve directory listing
at which point the connection seems to be severed by FileZilla.
When I try a command line ftp session, I also find that I cannot do
an
"ls" after log
Gary Dale wrote:
...
thanks for the heads-up! :)
i don't always need to use it, but today i finally updated some files
and went to connect and no dice. good thing i have a stable booting
partition i can get things done with if i have to.
songbird
>>> Response:227 Entering Passive Mode (,141,8).
> >>>> Command:MLSD
> >>>> Response:150 Accepted data connection
> >>>> Error:GnuTLS error -15: An unexpected TLS packet was
> >>>> received.
> >>>> Error
MLSD
> >> Response:150 Accepted data connection
> >> Error:GnuTLS error -15: An unexpected TLS packet was received.
> >> Error:The data connection could not be established:
> >> ECONNABORTED
> >> -
> >> Connection aborted
> >&
rror: Failed to retrieve directory listing
at which point the connection seems to be severed by FileZilla.
When I try a command line ftp session, I also find that I cannot do an
"ls" after logging in.
However I can connect from my server which is running Debian/Buster.
Something
ion
> Error:GnuTLS error -15: An unexpected TLS packet was received.
> Error:The data connection could not be established: ECONNABORTED
> -
> Connection aborted
> Response:226 72 matches total
> Error:Failed to retrieve directory listing
>
> at which poin
rror: Failed to retrieve directory listing
at which point the connection seems to be severed by FileZilla.
When I try a command line ftp session, I also find that I cannot do an
"ls" after logging in.
However I can connect from my server which is running Debian/Buster.
Something
Solved with help from another mailing list:
Dir::Bin::Methods::ftp "/usr/lib/apt/methods/ftp";
in /etc/apt/conf using the full path for ftp.
Johann
--
Because experiencing your loyal love is better than life itself,
my lips will praise you. (Psalm 63:3)
Johann Spies writes:
> We have a server in the DMZ with only connection to a ftp-server on campus
> for updates. No http(s) service available for apt.
I would recommend to use HTTP for that purpose.
> My problem: Where do I put that? I have tried the following:
>
> Created a
We have a server in the DMZ with only connection to a ftp-server on campus
for updates. No http(s) service available for apt.
While upgrading to buster, I got the message that the new apt disabled ftp
as method. The message also suggested the solution: *Set
Dir::Bin::Methods::ftp to "ft
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 06:34:33PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> > The "ftp" client appears to be flakey, but the
> > tnftp client seems to work well, with tab-completion and other commands
> > performing as expe
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 06:34:33PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> The "ftp" client appears to be flakey, but the
> tnftp client seems to work well, with tab-completion and other commands
> performing as expected. (The ncftp client *almost* works, but
> tab-completion doesn'
do a
> > > > tab-completion, the commands act on the local directory instead of
> the
> > > > remote, so that "ls" acts like "!ls".
> > >
> > > This is not how it's supposed to work. At least not ls (dir and ls
> should
>
gt; > remote, so that "ls" acts like "!ls".
> >
> > This is not how it's supposed to work. At least not ls (dir and ls should
> > both list the remote's system directory contents).
> >
> > Which ftp client are you using?
> >
>
&
ecute the command "ls" or "del" or do a
> > tab-completion, the commands act on the local directory instead of the
> > remote, so that "ls" acts like "!ls".
>
> This is not how it's supposed to work. At least not ls (dir and ls should
&
mpletion, the commands act on the local directory instead of the
> remote, so that "ls" acts like "!ls".
This is not how it's supposed to work. At least not ls (dir and ls should
both list the remote's system directory contents).
Which ftp client are you using?
I've tried different terminals, different shells, made sure there were no
ls aliases getting in the way.
ftp from a Macintosh works fine.
How do I get my Debian's ftp ls to function properly?
Thanks!
--
Kent West<")))><
Westing Peacefully - http://kentwest.blogspot.com
Thanks for your replies. The answers are
clear and helpful. Again thanks.
M.A. Perry
--
gt; > permitted.
> >
> > The URL specifications in /etc/apt/sources.list of
> > my Debian box contain both HTTP and FTP in the URL
> > for example: http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/ and this
> > confuses me.
> >
> > QUESTION:
> > Which data transfer
nstallations.
>
> We are currently writing a set of ip_tables rules for
> a default baseline -A OUTPUT DROP. Thus the rules
> will block outgoing traffic which is not specifically
> permitted.
>
> The URL specifications in /etc/apt/sources.list of
> my Debian box contain
ns.
>
> We are currently writing a set of ip_tables rules for
> a default baseline -A OUTPUT DROP. Thus the rules
> will block outgoing traffic which is not specifically
> permitted.
>
> The URL specifications in /etc/apt/sources.list of
> my Debian box contain both HTTP
OUTPUT DROP. Thus the rules
will block outgoing traffic which is not specifically
permitted.
The URL specifications in /etc/apt/sources.list of
my Debian box contain both HTTP and FTP in the URL
for example: http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/ and this
confuses me.
QUESTION:
Which data transfer protocol(s
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:44 AM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> On 10/12/2016 23:59, Nate Homier wrote:
>>
>> Debian 8 server. all updates applied.
>>
>> Followed carefully the wiki.debian.org/WordPress instructions. Now
>> WordPress says askimet plugin needs
On 10/12/2016 23:59, Nate Homier wrote:
Debian 8 server. all updates applied.
Followed carefully the wiki.debian.org/WordPress instructions. Now
WordPress says askimet plugin needs to be updated, but that ftp fails. I
can't update plugin without having a ftp server apparently. Othe
Debian 8 server. all updates applied.
Followed carefully the wiki.debian.org/WordPress instructions. Now
WordPress says askimet plugin needs to be updated, but that ftp fails. I
can't update plugin without having a ftp server apparently. Otherwise
WordPress works great. how do I updat
I asked this question on the ProFTPD list, but I thought it might be
more of a system question than an FTP server question. The more I look
at the message, I think it's probably both.
My system, which is now working correctly after reboot testing
following fstab changes discussed elsewhere,
y good,
but I'd be hesitant to run an FTP server again myself.
ns.
>>
>> Here's what I did on the old Windows server:
>>
>> Each user had their own login.
>>
>> All logins sent to the same read-only area, with one subdirectory in
>> which all users could write. I know how to set that all up with
>> regular FT
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 13:33:44 -0500 (EST), Jude wrote:
>If I were setting up an ftp server, I would create a /pub directory in
>/home and would also create a /home/pub/incoming directory then lock any
>guest into the /home/pub and /home/pub/incoming directories. The
>/home/pub dir
Yes, very helpful. I'll look at mount options.
Here's what I did on the old Windows server:
Each user had their own login.
All logins sent to the same read-only area, with one subdirectory in
which all users could write. I know how to set that all up with
regular FTP servers li
If I were setting up an ftp server, I would create a /pub directory in
/home and would also create a /home/pub/incoming directory then lock any
guest into the /home/pub and /home/pub/incoming directories. The
/home/pub directory would be where I'd put files available for download
an
Look in the /etc/ssh/ directory or /etc/default/ subdirectory those
configuration files likely will be in one of those two locations. On Thu,
31 Dec 2015, Steve Matzura wrote:
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:32:34
From: Steve Matzura
To: debian
Subject: Recommendation for FTP server
Resent-Date
Le primidi 11 nivôse, an CCXXIV, Steve Matzura a écrit :
> That locks the user in their home directory
That locks the user in any directory of your choosing. Choosing the home
directory is the most common case, and therefore the one you find explained,
but not the only option.
Regards,
--
Nic
Hi, Steve.
On 31/12/15 14:07, Steve Matzura wrote:
> That locks the user in their home directory, but I have to give them
> access to other things outside that directory, just not let them go
> walking around and get into any other directory on the system. That's
> why I was thinking of VSFTP, wh
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 11:32:34 -0500
Steve Matzura wrote:
>ProFTPD? VSFTP? Something else? I'm needing a secure connection,
>non-SSH, because a lot of ssh built into FTP clients let you go
>wandering around outside your home area, unless there's a way to
>protect a
On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 17:37:09 +0100, you wrote:
>Le primidi 11 nivôse, an CCXXIV, Steve Matzura a écrit :
>> ProFTPD? VSFTP? Something else? I'm needing a secure connection,
>> non-SSH, because a lot of ssh built into FTP clients let you go
>> wandering around outside you
Le primidi 11 nivôse, an CCXXIV, Steve Matzura a écrit :
> ProFTPD? VSFTP? Something else? I'm needing a secure connection,
> non-SSH, because a lot of ssh built into FTP clients let you go
> wandering around outside your home area,
Never rely on client restriction
ProFTPD? VSFTP? Something else? I'm needing a secure connection,
non-SSH, because a lot of ssh built into FTP clients let you go
wandering around outside your home area, unless there's a way to
protect against that in the ssh configuration file, which I did look
for but have not fou
rlhar...@oplink.net a écrit :
> On Fri, November 13, 2015 7:52 pm, Dennis Wicks wrote:
>>
>> My hosting has changed servers and I have to move all my
>> stuff pretty soon. I need a ftp program that will do site-to-site transfers
>> without having to download to my
Dennis Wicks wrote:
> Greetings;
>
> Been looking but haven't found it yet.
>
> My hosting has changed servers and I have to move all my stuff pretty soon.
> I need a ftp program that will do site-to-site transfers without having to
> download to my PC first then
On Fri, November 13, 2015 7:52 pm, Dennis Wicks wrote:
> Been looking but haven't found it yet.
>
> My hosting has changed servers and I have to move all my
> stuff pretty soon. I need a ftp program that will do site-to-site transfers
> without having to download to my PC firs
Greetings;
Been looking but haven't found it yet.
My hosting has changed servers and I have to move all my
stuff pretty soon. I need a ftp program that will do
site-to-site transfers without having to download to my PC
first then upload to the destination.
Anybody know of such a o
On Thursday 26 February 2015 14:04:54 Tony Baldwin wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 09:20:39AM +, Curt wrote:
> > On 2015-02-25, Wilko Fokken wrote:
> > >> I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that is easy and
> > >> pleasant to use. GUI ba
On 2015-02-25, Wilko Fokken wrote:
>>
>> I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that is easy and
>> pleasant
>> to use. GUI based. For the use of non-geeks as well as myself.
>>
>> Lisi
>
> My favourite ftp is mc:
> It works ftp tra
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 02:11:13PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Yes, I know I can STFW. I have in fact done so. But I am after personal
> experience.
>
> I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that is easy and
> pleasant
> to use. GUI based. For the use of
> With gFTP being apparently on its way out, being apparently removed by Debian
> 8,
gftp runs well under 7.7, so you have a bit more time before having to change.
Anyway I am not unduly worried as I'll be shifting some time ahead for a
systemd-free distribution.
Cheers,
Ron.
--
See,
On 2015-02-25, Bret Busby wrote:
> On 25/02/2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> gftp *is* in Debian 7 (though apparently not in 8 - see Liam below).
>
> Hmm.
>
> With GNOME 2 having been buried by Debian 7, and gFTP being apparently
> on its way out, being apparently removed by Debian 8, maybe I
I using Krusader (http://www.krusader.org/) , work well with FTP.
On 02/24/2015 03:11 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Yes, I know I can STFW. I have in fact done so. But I am after personal
experience.
I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that is easy and pleasant
to use. GUI based
On 25/02/2015, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> IMHO - Inhalation of a Multi-leafed Herbal Opiate ;)
> --posting from alex in debian-user--
>
Then, if it is frozen (the multi-leaf thing), and a person is sucking
on it, is the person, then, sucking on a popsicle?
--
Bret Busby
Arma
On 25/02/2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> gftp *is* in Debian 7 (though apparently not in 8 - see Liam below).
Hmm.
With GNOME 2 having been buried by Debian 7, and gFTP being apparently
on its way out, being apparently removed by Debian 8, maybe I and
others like me, will be continuing to use Deb
* Liam O'Toole [2015-02-25 01:05 +]:
> On 2015-02-24, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 February 2015 14:11:13 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >> I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that is easy and
> >> pleasant to use. GUI based. For the us
TFW. I have in fact done so. But I am after
>> >>> personal
>> >>> experience.
>> >>>
>> >>> I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that is easy and
>> >>> pleasant
>> >>> to use. GUI based. For the use of
sonal
> >>> experience.
> >>>
> >>> I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that is easy and
> >>> pleasant
> >>> to use. GUI based. For the use of non-geeks as well as myself.
> >>>
> >>> Lisi
>
On 25/02/2015, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 24/02/15 10:01 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
>> On 24/02/2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>> Yes, I know I can STFW. I have in fact done so. But I am after
>>> personal
>>> experience.
>>>
>>> I want a simple
On 24/02/15 10:01 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
On 24/02/2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Yes, I know I can STFW. I have in fact done so. But I am after personal
experience.
I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that is easy and
pleasant
to use. GUI based. For the use of non-geeks as well
On 2015-02-24, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 February 2015 14:11:13 Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that is easy and
>> pleasant to use. GUI based. For the use of non-geeks as well as myself.
>
> Many thanks to all who replied.
On Tuesday 24 February 2015 14:11:13 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that is easy and
> pleasant to use. GUI based. For the use of non-geeks as well as myself.
Many thanks to all who replied. I looked at all the suggestions, but have
chose
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 09:32 -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > Yes, I know I can STFW. I have in fact done so. But I am after
> > personal experience.
> >
> > I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that i
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Yes, I know I can STFW. I have in fact done so. But I am after
> personal experience.
>
> I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that is easy and
> pleasant to use. GUI based. For the use of non-geeks as well as
>
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 14:11:13 +
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that is easy and
> pleasant
> to use. GUI based. For the use of non-geeks as well as myself.
I am quite pleased with Gftp.
Cheers,
Ron.
--
I don'
On 24/02/2015, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Yes, I know I can STFW. I have in fact done so. But I am after personal
> experience.
>
> I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that is easy and
> pleasant
> to use. GUI based. For the use of non-geeks as well as myself.
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:22:45 +0200
Johann Spies wrote:
> On 24 February 2015 at 16:11, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> > Yes, I know I can STFW. I have in fact done so. But I am after
> > personal experience.
> >
> > I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting,
On 24 February 2015 at 16:11, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Yes, I know I can STFW. I have in fact done so. But I am after personal
> experience.
>
> I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that is easy and
> pleasant
> to use. GUI based. For the use of non-geeks as well
Yes, I know I can STFW. I have in fact done so. But I am after personal
experience.
I want a simple ftp client, for putting not getting, that is easy and pleasant
to use. GUI based. For the use of non-geeks as well as myself.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
there could be more
packages.
Now, trying to fetch the hashes, I used the FTP/HTTP page, and there
are
only 3 DVDs. I guess those are not the same ones, so those hashes
are
not usable, but it's not my question.
What is the content difference between jigdo and http ISOs? ( I know
what is
packages.
Now, trying to fetch the hashes, I used the FTP/HTTP page, and there
are only 3 DVDs. I guess those are not the same ones, so those hashes
are not usable, but it's not my question.
What is the content difference between jigdo and http ISOs? ( I know
what is jigdo and how it work
more
> packages.
>
> Now, trying to fetch the hashes, I used the FTP/HTTP page, and there are
> only 3 DVDs. I guess those are not the same ones, so those hashes are
> not usable, but it's not my question.
>
> What is the content difference between jigdo and http ISOs? ( I
1 - 100 of 2635 matches
Mail list logo
