Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 00:36:58 -0400, Grok Mogger wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:37:03 -0400, Grok Mogger wrote:
[...]
Hey everyone, thanks a lot for the advice! I ended up getting a Netgear
WPN311 Wireless G PCI card. Now I'm just t
On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 00:36:58 -0400, Grok Mogger wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:37:03 -0400, Grok Mogger wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Hey everyone, thanks a lot for the advice! I ended up getting a Netgear
> >> WPN311 Wireless G PCI
Andrew J. Barr([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:37:03 -0400, Grok Mogger wrote:
> >
>
> Also worth noting is that in the past NetworkManager had problems with
> madwifi because of it's unique behavior when scanning. I do not know i
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:37:03 -0400, Grok Mogger wrote:
[...]
Hey everyone, thanks a lot for the advice! I ended up getting a Netgear
WPN311 Wireless G PCI card. Now I'm just trying to get the darn thing
working. Right now, I'm actually using t
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:37:03 -0400, Grok Mogger wrote:
[...]
Hey everyone, thanks a lot for the advice! I ended up getting a Netgear
WPN311 Wireless G PCI card. Now I'm just trying to get the darn thing
working. Right now, I'm actually using t
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 11:37:03 -0400, Grok Mogger wrote:
[...]
> Hey everyone, thanks a lot for the advice! I ended up getting a Netgear
> WPN311 Wireless G PCI card. Now I'm just trying to get the darn thing
> working. Right now, I'm actually using the desktop ins
charles norwood wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 02:11 -0400, Celejar wrote:
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:10:05 -0400
Grok Mogger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to get a Wireless PCI Card for my Linux system.
I'd like it to support WPA2 and also be Wireless G.
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 02:11 -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:10:05 -0400
> Grok Mogger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd like to get a Wireless PCI Card for my Linux system.
> > I'd like it to support WPA2 an
On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 15:45:55 +0100
Hans du Plooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 10:06 -0400, Andrew J. Barr wrote:
> > >> I am suitably impressed with the bcm43xx driver--I've been using it with
> > >> the Airport Extreme card in my PowerBook G4.
> > >
> > > I've used it too,
On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 10:06 -0400, Andrew J. Barr wrote:
> >> I am suitably impressed with the bcm43xx driver--I've been using it with
> >> the Airport Extreme card in my PowerBook G4.
> >
> > I've used it too, with the AirForce One 4318 in my Acer laptop, but I
> > can't get it to do WEP, and it
27;d like it to support WPA2 and also be Wireless G. I am currently
using Debian, but this is a new system, so I'm perfectly willing
to switch to another distribution if necessary. I'm willing to
try new things if it'll make it easy to get a working wireless
card. =)
t a Wireless PCI Card for my Linux system.
> >> I'd like it to support WPA2 and also be Wireless G. I am currently
> >> using Debian, but this is a new system, so I'm perfectly willing
> >> to switch to another distribution if necessary. I'm willing to
Celejar wrote:
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:10:05 -0400
Grok Mogger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to get a Wireless PCI Card for my Linux system.
I'd like it to support WPA2 and also be Wireless G. I am currently
using Debian, but this is a new system,
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:10:05 -0400
Grok Mogger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to get a Wireless PCI Card for my Linux system.
> I'd like it to support WPA2 and also be Wireless G. I am currently
> using Debian, but this is a new system,
Hello,
I'd like to get a Wireless PCI Card for my Linux system. I'd
like it to support WPA2 and also be Wireless G. I am currently
using Debian, but this is a new system, so I'm perfectly willing
to switch to another distribution if necessary. I'm willing to
try
H.S. wrote:
Micha Feigin wrote:
I am trying to compile from within emacs (using M-x compile which
calls make -k)
In the output I get wierd characters (I think unicode characters):
main.cc: In function גint main(int, char**)ג:
main.cc:16: error: no matching function for call to
גLaplace
Micha Feigin wrote:
I am trying to compile from within emacs (using M-x compile which calls make -k)
In the output I get wierd characters (I think unicode characters):
main.cc: In function גint main(int, char**)ג:
main.cc:16: error: no matching function for call to
גLaplaceMat::LaplaceMa
I am trying to compile from within emacs (using M-x compile which calls make -k)
In the output I get wierd characters (I think unicode characters):
main.cc: In function גint main(int, char**)ג:
main.cc:16: error: no matching function for call to
גLaplaceMat::LaplaceMat(int&)ג
LaplaceMat.
Hello Mesh- and Wireless geeks,
since my 4 Mobilhomes and my Truck is nearly complete, I have some problems
with the Wireless connection between the Mobilehomes, the Truck and the
Trailer.
I need a realy powerfull Wireless card which support a/b/g standards in a
Wireless-Mesh to connect all 6
On 2/2/07, Justin Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/2/07, celejar wrote:
> PCI, USB, or PCMCIA? Output of lspci or lsusb?
PCMCIA, not sure what the Output is...
--
Regards
Justin Hartman
Please reply to the list.
Do 'lspci -v', preferably as root, and find the lines that seem to
correspo
On 2/2/07, Justin Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone know how I can get the above card working on Debian Etch?
I'm looking for a generic driver that I can load without having to
install Gnome Desktop.
Thanks in advance.
--
Regards
Justin Hartman
PCI, USB, or PCMCIA? Output of lspci
Does anyone know how I can get the above card working on Debian Etch?
I'm looking for a generic driver that I can load without having to
install Gnome Desktop.
Thanks in advance.
--
Regards
Justin Hartman
PGP Key ID: 102CC123
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "uns
michael writes:
> On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 15:08 +0100, Jhair Tocancipa Triana wrote:
>> Latest libc6 version in unstable is 2.3.6.ds1-10 though. What does
>>
>> apt-cache policy libc6
>>
>> say?
>>
> aha!
> ~$ apt-cache policy libc6
> libc6:
> Installed: 2.3.6-15
> Candidate: 2.3.6-15
> Pa
000
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
which I presume means I've pinned it in the past...
And removing said entry from /etc/apt/preferences and I'm away:
~$ sudo apt-get install g++
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be install
michael writes:
> On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 14:51 +0100, Jhair Tocancipa Triana wrote:
>> michael writes:
>> > ii libc6 2.3.6-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
>>
>> This a *very* outdated version of libc6 (released on Juny 2006). When
>> was your last upgrade?
> today!
> ~$ sudo
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 03:35:47PM +, michael wrote:
>
> Please excuse my ignorance but I was under the impression that aptitude
> and apt did the same thing, so how would using aptitude solve my problem
> (and presumably it would be possible to solve it using apt-get in a
> similar manner...)
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 02:45:55PM +, michael wrote:
>
> today!
>
> ~$ sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install libc6
> Hit http://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable/main Packages
> Hit http://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable/main Release
> Hit http://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable/non-free Packages
> Hit h
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 09:45 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 02:21:52PM +, michael wrote:
> > I have an unstable system on which I'm trying to install g++ but I've
> > been getting the below dependency problem for about a month. Could
>
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 14:51 +0100, Jhair Tocancipa Triana wrote:
> michael writes:
>
> > I have an unstable system on which I'm trying to install g++ but I've
> > been getting the below dependency problem for about a month. Could
> > somebody highlight whethe
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 02:21:52PM +, michael wrote:
> I have an unstable system on which I'm trying to install g++ but I've
> been getting the below dependency problem for about a month. Could
> somebody highlight whether this is just an 'unstable' "some p
michael writes:
> I have an unstable system on which I'm trying to install g++ but I've
> been getting the below dependency problem for about a month. Could
> somebody highlight whether this is just an 'unstable' "some packages
> just not ready" issue
I have an unstable system on which I'm trying to install g++ but I've
been getting the below dependency problem for about a month. Could
somebody highlight whether this is just an 'unstable' "some packages
just not ready" issue or something deeper? I've includ
On Friday 19 January 2007 09:17, Arno Valentin wrote:
> but gvim -g answers:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/src/vim >vim -g
> E25: GUI cannot be used: Not enabled at compile time
>
>
> So, how to manage to enable at compile time? I don't find a point to unmark
>
/or
#Athena but don't want to make gvim (the GUI version of Vim with nice
#menus and scrollbars, but makes Vim bigger and startup slower).
So, if I change nothing, gui should be installed.
but gvim -g answers:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/src/vim >vim -g
E25: GUI cannot be u
/or
#Athena but don't want to make gvim (the GUI version of Vim with nice
#menus and scrollbars, but makes Vim bigger and startup slower).
So, if I change nothing, gui should be installed.
but gvim -g answers:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/src/vim >vim -g
E25: GUI cannot be u
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 02:55:56PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
From: Johann Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: links -g version 2.1pre26-4
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 01:33:05PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
Hello,
"links2 -g" version 2.1pre23-1
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:06:16AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
From: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: links -g version 2.1pre26-4
Hello,
"links2 -g" version 2.1pre23-1 works fine on my box, but version
2.1pre26-4 doesn't wor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/07/06 06:33, Gerard Robin wrote:
> Hello,
> "links2 -g" version 2.1pre23-1 works fine on my box, but version
> 2.1pre26-4 doesn't work ? (it's the package : links2_2.1pre26-3_i386.deb)
>
> is it working fin
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 01:33:05PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
> Hello,
> "links2 -g" version 2.1pre23-1 works fine on my box,
> but version 2.1pre26-4 doesn't work ?
> (it's the package : links2_2.1pre26-3_i386.deb)
>
> is it working fine for someone ?
I
Hello,
"links2 -g" version 2.1pre23-1 works fine on my box,
but version 2.1pre26-4 doesn't work ?
(it's the package : links2_2.1pre26-3_i386.deb)
is it working fine for someone ?
tia
--
Gérard
Thanks - I was just out of date. It works now.
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/8/06, Thomas H. George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a occasional programmer I tried to recompile an old program I
> intended to expand. Although #include was entered before the
> start of main the g++ compiler did not recognize cin and cout. This
> seems so elemen
On 2006-02-08T20:26:58-0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
> As a occasional programmer I tried to recompile an old program I
> intended to expand. Although #include was entered before the
> start of main the g++ compiler did not recognize cin and cout.
Add a "using namespace std;&q
As a occasional programmer I tried to recompile an old program I
intended to expand. Although #include was entered before the
start of main the g++ compiler did not recognize cin and cout. This
seems so elementary it certainly shouldn't have changed and it
certainly worked before as
Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
Hi all,
I have a new Supermicro X6DHT-G motherboard based system and I'm have a
problem with it recognizing the CD ROM drive. The CD ROM is PATA device
that appears to be handled via an Intel Corp. 6300ESB chip probably
using the IDE SATA controller and some
Hi all,
I have a new Supermicro X6DHT-G motherboard based system and I'm have a
problem with it recognizing the CD ROM drive. The CD ROM is PATA device
that appears to be handled via an Intel Corp. 6300ESB chip probably
using the IDE SATA controller and some PATA to SATA interface.
On 2005-12-20, Heimdall Midgard penned:
>
> But surely in *n*x you can't assume what a file is on the basis of
> its extension?
>
Well, sometimes it's a good starting point. For example, one of my
vim configuration files has:
au BufNewFile,BufRead *.java call JavaBuildEnv()
--
monique
Ask sma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Heimdall Midgard wrote:
> I just noticed something weird with my (G)Vim installation
> when editing generic config files. The syntax highlighting
> colors appear wrong. Could somebody do a test to confirm if
> this is really a b
2005/12/20, Paolo Pantaleo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2005/12/20, Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Heimdall Midgard wrote:
> > > I just noticed something weird with my (G)Vim
> > > installation when editing generic config files. The
> > >
Heimdall Midgard wrote:
Note how addition of a pair of parentheses to Line 3 of the
second file "causes" Line 4 to be displayed in the right
"comment" color.
I can reproduce the behavior you were talking both in vim and gvim. But
I do not know anything about udev syntax, so cannot comment
2005/12/20, Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Heimdall Midgard wrote:
> > I just noticed something weird with my (G)Vim installation
> > when editing generic config files. The syntax highlighting
> > colors appear wrong. Could somebody do a test to confirm if
> &g
Heimdall Midgard wrote:
I just noticed something weird with my (G)Vim installation
when editing generic config files. The syntax highlighting
colors appear wrong. Could somebody do a test to confirm if
this is really a bug or just a misconfiguration on my end?
To do the test, create two files
I just noticed something weird with my (G)Vim installation
when editing generic config files. The syntax highlighting
colors appear wrong. Could somebody do a test to confirm if
this is really a bug or just a misconfiguration on my end?
To do the test, create two files both named "udev.
On Tuesday, 4 of October 2005 11:10, Pooly wrote:
> Is it possible to use g++-3.4 with sarge ? Currently it's g++-3.3, but
> if I install g++-3.4 and then remove g++-3.3, it remove the package
> g++ as well (and then g++ is not found, I guess it's just a simlink,
> but
Hi,
Is it possible to use g++-3.4 with sarge ? Currently it's g++-3.3, but
if I install g++-3.4 and then remove g++-3.3, it remove the package
g++ as well (and then g++ is not found, I guess it's just a simlink,
but I don't want to do any mistake). What should I do ?
--
Pooly
Webz
Hi,
I have a sid chroot that I am trying to figure out which version of g++-4.0
stopped compiling a big c++ code that I work on. I have manually downloaded
a couple of different versions of g++-4.0 and related packages from
snapshot.debian.org, but it seems rather painful to just use dpkg -i
Hi
today I did an apt-get upgrade and found that g++ now points to g++-4
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.0.1 (Debian 4.0.1-2)
I compiled my programs with this new version (they make use of stl) and
found that these programs segfaults (e.g., when iterating over a list).
should I upgrade also the
Last week I switched from using magicdev to gnome-volume-manager for all
its hotplug goodness. The hotplug works fine, but for some reason I
can't see my CD-Rom and CDRW.
The versions used are:
# dpkg -l hal hotplug dbus-1 gnome-volume-manager
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=N
can run a
> > > copy of Memtest86 on the box tonight. I just don't see any other signs
> > > of instability on the box, and it gets quite heavily used, compiling a
> > > lot of code every day as a development server. Is it just that g++ is
> > > working the memo
I tried compiling the program, and had no problems. No compiler errors
crapping out or anything.
Running on Debian Sarge.
--
John L. Fjellstad
web: http://www.fjellstad.org/ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 00:27, Patrick Albuquerque wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 07:45:17AM -0400, James Wiggs wrote:
> >I'm trying to determine if I've found bugs in the C++ compiler
> > on Sarge or not. I'm trying to compile quickfix-1.9.2 and some of
>
> I tried compile, just for kicks.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 07:45:17AM -0400, James Wiggs wrote:
>I'm trying to determine if I've found bugs in the C++ compiler
> on Sarge or not. I'm trying to compile quickfix-1.9.2 and some of
I tried compile, just for kicks.
No problems. One question - what does the software do?
Sarge,
a hardware problem, then I could
> > just by some replacement memory or whatever and be done with it. Any
> > suggestions as to tests I could run to track that down? I can run a
> > copy of Memtest86 on the box tonight. I just don't see any other signs
> > of instabil
On Oct 22 2004, James Wiggs wrote:
>I have access to another box running RedHat 8.0; I will attempt
> a compile over there.
You might want to create a chroot install of sarge there (or in any other
computer you can) to test if it is really g++ doing bad things.
Hope this helps, R
ny
> suggestions as to tests I could run to track that down? I can run a
> copy of Memtest86 on the box tonight. I just don't see any other signs
> of instability on the box, and it gets quite heavily used, compiling a
> lot of code every day as a development server. Is it just that g
a hardware problem, then I could
> > just by some replacement memory or whatever and be done with it. Any
> > suggestions as to tests I could run to track that down? I can run a
> > copy of Memtest86 on the box tonight. I just don't see any other signs
> > of instabil
n? I can run a
copy of Memtest86 on the box tonight. I just don't see any other signs
of instability on the box, and it gets quite heavily used, compiling a
lot of code every day as a development server. Is it just that g++ is
working the memory a lot harder than gcc/php/mysql/xfree86/every
>The bugs are *not* repeatable. I can type make, have the make
> choke on something like the above, type make again, and it will get
> through the compile.
Are you sure you don't have hardware problems?
Most likely such gcc failures are caused by bad ram and/or processor
overheat.
--
To UN
gly scrutinized, and used in production
where literally millions of dollars a day depend on it. A lot of
people claim to be running it on Linux, but it looks like it gets
much more use on Solaris or even (ack!) Windows.
Here's an example of the sort of errors I'm getting:
- begin
B%5%$%I%S%8%M%9$N7hDjHG$G$9!*!!(J
$B;~N.$K>h$k%S%8%M%9$OI,$:@.8y$7$^$9!#(J
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED];v$b!*(J
$B9TF0$K0\$9$+H]$+$G$9!#;qK\6b$O(J5000$B1_!*(J
(B1$BF|(J10$BKg$OGd$l$^$9!*(J
$B$"[EMAIL PROTECTED](J
$B8e$O$"[EMAIL PROTECTED](J
(
p[g^CLOVERS̲o^[Å·Bêx¨èµÜµ½ªÄx¨è¢½µÜ·B
ºLÌAhX©ço^ð±¯Ä¾³¢B
1650316479
¡ãA±Ìo^mF[ªsKvÈûͺLÌAhXÉANZXµÄº³¢B
http://www.parttime-lovers.com/touroku_del.htm?uid=16479
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
p[g^CLOVERS̲o^[Å·Bêx¨èµÜµ½ªÄx¨è¢½µÜ·B
ºLÌAhX©ço^ð±¯Ä¾³¢B
1650316479
¡ãA±Ìo^mF[ªsKvÈûͺLÌAhXÉANZXµÄº³¢B
http://www.parttime-lovers.com/touroku_del.htm?uid=16479
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
Could you please inform me where can I
get translation for this type of Chinese ¾HÄR§g.
Thank you.
Alan
BFHN)$7$?$$?M!">!$AAH$_$K$J$j$?$$J}(J
$BB(6b$N%S%8%M%9$G$9!#(J
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED];$s$+!#(J
(B
(B
(B http://yamashigure.yi.org/
(B
(B http://akatukinotume.minidns.net/
$B!!(J
(B
(B
(B--
(BTo UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
e the
following packages:
g++-3.3 gcc-3.3 libstdc++5-3.3-dev
it seems the problem is in
/usr/share/doc//changelog.Debian.gz, which the new package
(replacing old package), fails to overwrite.
any help would be appreciated ... more info below:
ac;
The following packages will be upgraded:
g++-3.3 gcc
Hi,
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:20:17 -0400, Anthony Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm getting overwrite problems when trying to apt-get upgrade the
> following packages:
>
> g++-3.3 gcc-3.3 libstdc++5-3.3-dev
>
> it seems the problem is in
> /usr/share/doc//ch
i'm getting overwrite problems when trying to apt-get upgrade the
following packages:
g++-3.3 gcc-3.3 libstdc++5-3.3-dev
it seems the problem is in
/usr/share/doc//changelog.Debian.gz, which the new package
(replacing old package), fails to overwrite.
any help would be appreciated ... more
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That may indeed be it. Is there any known way short of looking a the
asm dump of a binary for telling what CPU instructions are used? When
asked I was directed to readelf and file and they work great for
SPARC based development,
I wouldn't bet on that either:-)
Seems t
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 01:32:21PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That may indeed be it. Is there any known way short of looking a the
> asm dump of a binary for telling what CPU instructions are used? When
> asked I was directed to readelf and file and they work great for
> SPARC based devel
ate to have to start over.
> >
> > The makefile I created for this project explicitly tells the compiler
> > (g++) to compile the binary using i686 (-march=pentiumpro) assembly
> > instructions and internal timeings. Yet for some [explitive]
> > [explitive] reaso
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:48:45PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For the past few weeks I have been co-working on a private project. I
> have done allot of work on it and I would hate to have to start over.
>
> The makefile I created for this project explicitly tells the compile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the past few weeks I have been co-working on a private project. I
have done allot of work on it and I would hate to have to start over.
The makefile I created for this project explicitly tells the compiler
(g++) to compile the binary using i686 (-march=pentiumpro
For the past few weeks I have been co-working on a private project. I
have done allot of work on it and I would hate to have to start over.
The makefile I created for this project explicitly tells the compiler
(g++) to compile the binary using i686 (-march=pentiumpro) assembly
instructions and
[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B!!(B
$B(B
[$B;~Be$N$a!<$k%^%,%8%s(B]$B#0#0#5#2#79f(B
$B!!(B
$B(,(B[PR]$B(,#12/1_!/1_0J>e<}F~Z5r8+$;$^$9!#!!:_Bp%M%C%H$
One one of my machines, aptitude is behaving strangely.
I hit 'g' and it takes me to the list of packages to be installed. I
hit 'g' again and it downloads the packages (or just completes, if I
already have them all). I choose "Continue" and ... I go back to t
I had compiled something with the g++ compiler (2.95) a night
or two back. I used dselect to deinstall then reinstall some things. It went
through a long install. Now I went to build the program again because I was
working with a makefile setting up the proper compiler options and now the
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 05:10:55PM +0100, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 February 2004 06:27, Thomas H. George wrote:
> >
> > If this question is regarded as wildly off target for this list,
>
> It probably is, and so, I'll not respond directly to your question, but
> rather ask a new
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:06:57AM -0600, Lucas Bergman wrote:
> > As a physicist I wrote large programs in Pascal before retiring in
> > 1994 but nothing since until last week. I thought of a problem I
> > wanted to solve, read up on C++ and got my program working with only
> > a few struggles wi
> As a physicist I wrote large programs in Pascal before retiring in
> 1994 but nothing since until last week. I thought of a problem I
> wanted to solve, read up on C++ and got my program working with only
> a few struggles with syntax but how to write directly to the printer
> has eluded me.
Th
On Wednesday 11 February 2004 06:27, Thomas H. George wrote:
>
> If this question is regarded as wildly off target for this list,
It probably is, and so, I'll not respond directly to your question, but
rather ask a new one... :-)
> As a physicist I wrote large programs in Pascal before retirin
As a physicist I wrote large programs in Pascal before retiring in 1994
but nothing since until last week. I thought of a problem I wanted to
solve, read up on C++ and got my program working with only a few
struggles with syntax but how to write directly to the printer has
eluded me. I could
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, arief_mulya wrote:
> Other thing I have in mind is, what is Smart Array controller? I got 3
> scsi disk each 72GB, but only got 144GB disk in size. Is it RAID or
> something like that?
How the OS sees your disks depends on how the array is configured. You
need to run the ar
And I heard arief_mulya exclaim:
> I have to install Woody on Proliant DL 380 today.
> I got everything working (even as I don't know most of the stuff there
> :-) ), except ethernet card.
In case you haven't found an answer already using google et al, on our
boxes of the same kind I believe the t
inux Howto -
http://www.wickle.com/weblog/index.php?p=51&more=1
-Mensagem original-
De: arief_mulya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada: terça-feira, 13 de Janeiro de 2004 11:08
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: [HELP] Debian Woody on HP Proliant DL 380 G-3
Dear all.
Before, plea
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, arief_mulya wrote:
> Before, please cc the answer to me directly also as I not registered on
> the list.
Argh! Please, if you are asking for our help, why not check either the
list archives or google groups?
> Other thing I have in mind is, what is Smart Array controller? I
Dear all.
Before, please cc the answer to me directly also as I not registered on
the list.
I have to install Woody on Proliant DL 380 today.
I got everything working (even as I don't know most of the stuff there
:-) ), except ethernet card.
Other thing I have in mind is, what is Smart Array co
H-uman...G-rowth...H-ormone Therapy
"Overall deterioration of the body that comes with growing old is not
inevitable."---Dr. Daniel Rudman's in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Follow me to longer living: http://www.mmv9.org?affil=49
Scientific research and evidence
H-uman...G-rowth...H-ormone Therapy
"Overall deterioration of the body that comes with growing old is not
inevitable."---Dr. Daniel Rudman's in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Follow me to longer living: http://www.mmv9.org?affil=49
Scientific research and evidence
Any recommendations for a 802.11g wireless pcmcia card that is
supported by linux/debian?
I've done a lot of googling and reading, and while 802.11b seems well
supported, 11g seems less supported.
So any recommendations for setups that work in debian unstable for a
laptop would be appreciated
Hi all.
Many of you might have already noticed this issue. For the rest, I suggest
reading http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8610
Let me try to summarize the problem:
In debian/testing (sarge) there are two different, possibly coexisting,
g++ compilers, the 2.95 flavor and the 3.3
201 - 300 of 541 matches
Mail list logo
