Am 2007-05-21 07:33:42, schrieb Ron Johnson:
> On 05/21/07 05:32, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to upgrade my system from glibc-2.3 to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to
> > 4.1.2.
> > I did "wajig build glibc" but this results in a
On 05/21/07 05:32, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm trying to upgrade my system from glibc-2.3 to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to
>> > 4.1.2.
>> > I did "wajig build glibc" but this results in a request for gcc-4.1.2.
>&g
gt; Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm trying to upgrade my system from glibc-2.3 to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to
>> > 4.1.2.
>> > I did "wajig build glibc" but this results in a request for gcc-4.1.2.
>> > However, doing "wajig build gcc-4.1" complains abo
On 5/21/07, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to upgrade my system from glibc-2.3 to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to
> 4.1.2. I did "wajig build glibc" but this results in a request for
> gcc-4.1.2.
On 5/21/07, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/21/07 05:32, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to upgrade my system from glibc-2.3 to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to
> 4.1.2.
> I did "wajig build glibc&quo
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to upgrade my system from glibc-2.3 to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to
> 4.1.2. I did "wajig build glibc" but this results in a request for
> gcc-4.1.2. However, doing "wajig build gcc-4.1" complains about abse
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/21/07 05:32, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to upgrade my system from glibc-2.3 to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to
> 4.1.2.
> I did "wajig build glibc" but this results in a request for gcc-4.1.2.
> Ho
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade my system from glibc-2.3 to 2.5 and gcc-4.1.1 to 4.1.2.
I did "wajig build glibc" but this results in a request for gcc-4.1.2.
However, doing "wajig build gcc-4.1" complains about absence of
glibc-2.5. How should I proceed?
--
my pl
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:59:02AM +0200, csanyipal wrote:
>
> I find these with aptitude:
> $ aptitude search glibc
> v glibc-2.3.6-2 -
> v glibc-2.3.6.ds1-1 -
> p glibc-doc - GNU C Library: Documentation
> p glibc-doc-referen
/lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by
/usr/brlcad/lib/libpkg.so.19)
mged: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by
/usr/brlcad/lib/libz.so.1)
mged: /lib/tls/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by
/usr/brlcad/lib/libpng.so.
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 11:58:38 -0500
Seb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anybody having problems updating and upgrading today? I see that
> package the testing locales package now depends on glibc-2.3.6.ds1-1,
> which is nowhere to be found. It may simply be a mat
Hi,
Is anybody having problems updating and upgrading today? I see that
package the testing locales package now depends on glibc-2.3.6.ds1-1,
which is nowhere to be found. It may simply be a matter of waiting for it
to be available, but ftp.us.debian.org is not very responsive now.
Cheers
On (30/08/06 07:23), Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On 8/29/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:32:44PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Anyone know what the 'ds' in versions of recent GLibC
On 8/29/06, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:32:44PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
> Anyone know what the 'ds' in versions of recent GLibC in unstable mean?
>
Daniel Stone. I believe he incorporates some signifi
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 06:32:44PM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
> Anyone know what the 'ds' in versions of recent GLibC in unstable mean?
>
Daniel Stone. I believe he incorporates some significant patches and
wants to differentiate between his customized versi
Hi,
Anyone know what the 'ds' in versions of recent GLibC in unstable mean?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to install a beta version of TwonkyMusic on my server
(Debian Sarge/Stable, Via M1 x86 motherboard).
I know that I have to install at least the x86 version, but I have the
choice between the glibc 2.2.5 or 2.3.3 version.
A bit of googling suggests that Sarge uses a versi
Thursday 08 June 2006 7:39 pm, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> NZG wrote:
> > I'm trying to build
> > glibc_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3
> > from source, but it's failing
> >
> > I do this:
> > wget
> > http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.
NZG wrote:
> I'm trying to build
> glibc_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3
> from source, but it's failing
>
> I do this:
> wget
> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3.dsc
> wget
> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.
I'm trying to build
glibc_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3
from source, but it's failing
I do this:
wget
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3.dsc
wget
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/g/glibc/glibc_2.3.2.ds1-22sarge3.diff$
wget
http://ftp.debian.org/debian
Hi, until recently, many gtk applications gave me *** glibc detected .
. . *** crash errors, but they stopped immediately when I turned off
gtk themes in the KDE control panel. What is the relevant package that
I should report the bug against?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hi,
when I run a selfwritten C++ program on my etch box I get:
*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x0813c8f0 ***
But on suse, kubuntu and Windows it runs.
We use qt4, boost and openCV. On my etch box I use the debian-packages while
these libs are installed from source on
Hello everybody,
Some of my programs stopped working after a recent
glibc upgrade of unstable. The error is this:
version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time
reference
The problem is similar to the one described in:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-443051.html
ANy
Hans du Plooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to install amavisd-new 2.4 on Sarge, using the testing
> repositry. It wants to upgrade a few packages, most notably perl and
> glibc. How safe is this? I know there's always risk, but is there a
> reasonab
Hi!
* Hans du Plooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060507 20:25]:
> That's the first place I looked, but they only have 2.3.3 for stable,
> and i'm really looking for 2.4. Guess I'll have to wait a little
> longer.
Than you might try to create your own backported package by fetching the
source package an
Hans du Plooy wrote:
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 14:13 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
It is *very* unsafe. The amavisd-new package is in backports. I would
just use that instead.
http://backports.org/instructions.html
Thanks, Roberto,
That's the first place I looked, but they only have 2.3.3
On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 14:13 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> It is *very* unsafe. The amavisd-new package is in backports. I would
> just use that instead.
>
> http://backports.org/instructions.html
Thanks, Roberto,
That's the first place I looked, but they only have 2.3.3 for stable,
and i'
Hans du Plooy wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm trying to install amavisd-new 2.4 on Sarge, using the testing
> repositry. It wants to upgrade a few packages, most notably perl and
> glibc. How safe is this? I know there's always risk, but is there a
> reasonable cha
Hi guys,
I'm trying to install amavisd-new 2.4 on Sarge, using the testing
repositry. It wants to upgrade a few packages, most notably perl and
glibc. How safe is this? I know there's always risk, but is there a
reasonable chance that this will not break anything (I'm only
Hi all,
Does anyone know if the glibc-kernheaders of rpm package is the same as linux-kernel-headers for Debian?
Are they similar?
BR,
Mauricio Lin.
hi:
Few days ago. i upgraded few packages like k3b, kdelibs etc from etch.
after doing so my gnome apps not working well. below is the error
message when running gedit as normal user.
--
*** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x08219f50 ***
---
If i run gedit by: export MALLOC_CHECK_
Hi,
Feature test macro _POSIX_SOURCE refers to which edition of POSIX.1 ?
And _XOPEN_SOURCE refers to which SUS version ?
I've got installed libc6 and glibc-doc both 2.3.5-7. I've carefully read the
documentation from these packages, but couldn't find clear, unambiguous
answer
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 11:32:06PM +0200, Jan wrote:
>
> Does anyone have a suggestion on how I can make Mathematica work?
>
This may not be very smart, but if nothing works, you could try a sarge
install in a chroot environment. Then you could install Mathematica there.
I had the inverse probl
Hello
I recently upgraded my Debian unstable, so that it is fairly up to date
with the newest packages (which it wasn't). In the process, glibc was also
upgraded. This meant that my Mathematica 4.2 would not work anymore. I
faced a similar problem before, the solution I used then was to in
This might be quite a basic question.
I've Just done apt-get upgrade, and there seems to be a problem with
installing libc6. This is what I get:
Unpacking replacement libc6 ...dpkg: error processing
/mirror/debian/pool/main/g/glibc/libc6_2.3.5-6_i386.deb (--unpack):
unable to create `./li
Hello all,
Sorry for the cross-posting.
I'm running a stock sarge machine with the 32bit 2.6.8 kernel on a AMD64
3200+ machine. I'm using some unstable and demudi packages for media
applications, in particular pure-data (PD).
Problem I'm having is that PD crashes when I try and use v4l2. Actua
Hello all,
I'm running a stock sarge machine with the 32bit 2.6.8 kernel on a AMD64
3200+ machine. I'm using some unstable and demudi packages.
Problem I'm having is that a few apps (actually almost all my v4l apps)
crash when I try and capture video. Actually there is no fault, but the
software
Hello all,
I'm running a stock sarge machine with the 32bit 2.6.8 kernel on a AMD64
3200+ machine. I'm using some unstable and demudi packages.
Problem I'm having is that a few apps (actually almost all my v4l apps)
crash when I try and capture video. Actually there is no fault, but the
software
Hi! I am trying to compile glibc 2.3.5 on etch, but when I do, it goes
fine except that it doesn't overwrite /lib/tls/*. My configure command
is as follows:
../glibc-2.3.5/configure --prefix=/usr --disable-profile --enable-add-ons \
> --enable-kernel=2.2.0 --libexecdir=/usr/lib \
Paulo M C Aragão wrote on Jul, 1:
> Hi All,
>
> How do I tell gcc to use the debug version of glibc ?
>
> I installed libc6-dbg but I just can't find out how to direct gcc to use
> the debug version of the libraries.
Sorry to bother everybody. I hadn't go
Hi All,
How do I tell gcc to use the debug version of glibc ?
I installed libc6-dbg but I just can't find out how to direct gcc to use
the debug version of the libraries. I searched gcc's manual and googled
around but couldn't find out what certainly should be a trivial comm
Hello List,
I want to report the memory used
up by my C application at different stages:
I guess that I must reach some usefull inforamtion
with mallinfo, but up to know I have not yet figured
out how to do so ?
Hints or advices are welcome.
Thanks,
Jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
the -static flag succeeds without errors, but this is not
> > really a solution.
> >
> > I am using the latest packages from the 'testing' section, including gcc
> > 3.3.5-5 and glibc 2.3.2.ds1-20, on a Pentium II.
> >
> > I found some similar repor
undefined
> > reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /lib/libc.so.6: undefined
> > reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]' /lib/libc.so.6: u
7; errors:
>
> $ cat test.c
> int main() {
> return 0;
> }
> $ gcc test.c
> /lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to
[...]
> Compiling with the -static flag succeeds without errors, but this is not
> really a solution.
>
> I am using the latest packages from the &
1 exit status
Compiling with the -static flag succeeds without errors, but this is not
really a solution.
I am using the latest packages from the 'testing' section, including gcc
3.3.5-5 and glibc 2.3.2.ds1-20, on a Pentium II.
I found some similar reports in the mailing list archives
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 15:00 -0500, Robert Harris wrote:
> I've happily been playing NeverWinter Nights on my Debian Unstable
> Linux system for quite some time. In the last month I've started
> having a problem I can't trace down. The 3D world just turns black,
> grey or whatever the background c
I've happily been playing NeverWinter Nights on my Debian Unstable
Linux system for quite some time. In the last month I've started
having a problem I can't trace down. The 3D world just turns black,
grey or whatever the background color is but the overlay HUD, the chat
boxes, etc are all there.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 07:50:53PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:30:24PM -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:20:50PM -0700, Cole S. Ashcraft wrote:
> > > Is there an updated version of glibc (2.3) and gcc for woody?
> >
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:30:24PM -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:20:50PM -0700, Cole S. Ashcraft wrote:
> > Is there an updated version of glibc (2.3) and gcc for woody?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cole
>
> There is no updated anything fo
On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:20:50PM -0700, Cole S. Ashcraft wrote:
> Is there an updated version of glibc (2.3) and gcc for woody?
>
> Thanks,
> Cole
There is no updated anything for woody.
But, you can install the libc6, libdb1_compat, gcc-3.3, etc from woody:
~/homework/2004/0
Is there an updated version of glibc (2.3) and gcc for woody?
Thanks,
Cole
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu 16 September 2004 15:29, Mark D. Hansen wrote:
> Sorry for the dumb question, but how do I tell which version of gcc and
> glibc are installed on my current Debian configuration? Thanks, Mark
dpkg -l gcc libc6
Cheers,
Ray
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for the dumb question, but how do I tell which version of gcc and glibc are
installed on my current Debian configuration? Thanks, Mark
Jeff Elkins wrote:
> I set up a script to swap the libs, run the converter, then swap
> them back so as not to leave my system in an unstable state. Goodbye
> Windows!
A slightly easier method would be to install the shared library in a
private location, say $HOME/rh-libs, and then use LD_LIBRARY_
Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:29:33 -0400
Freelgy durifng 3 dayms
Onlmy for the membders of club 30 % the discount
Welcomve to Crazy - yoxung loliotas.
Copy and paste this link in your browser
http://perso.wanadoo.es/vanadiyl4/secret-content/
Only hezre you`ll see pre-tdeen models 6-17
On Monday 07 June 2004 12:06 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
>Jeff Elkins wrote:
>> Bob Proulx wrote:
>> > Jeff Elkins wrote:
>> > > pvconv: relocation error: pvconv: undefined symbol: __dynamic_cast_2
>> >
>> > I was curious enough to download the application and try it. I can
>> > get a usage string out o
Jeff Elkins wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Jeff Elkins wrote:
> > > pvconv: relocation error: pvconv: undefined symbol: __dynamic_cast_2
> >
> > I was curious enough to download the application and try it. I can
> > get a usage string out of it so I think I have all of the libraries on
> > my wood
On Sunday 06 June 2004 11:06 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
>Jeff Elkins wrote:
>> Bob Proulx wrote:
>> >This following is probably the magic package you need to meet binary
>> >compatibility with Red Hat packages.
>> >
>> > apt-get install libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1
>> >
>> >You can get it from here.
>> >
>> >
Jeff Elkins wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> >This following is probably the magic package you need to meet binary
> >compatibility with Red Hat packages.
> >
> > apt-get install libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1
> >
> >You can get it from here.
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/stable/oldlibs/libstdc++2.9-glib
On Sunday 06 June 2004 10:11 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
>Pardon me for missing the start of this thread.
>
>Adam Aube wrote:
>> Jeff Elkins wrote:
>> > To use PureVoice Converter, you must have the following:
>> >
>> > - Linux for x86 (any distribution or
Pardon me for missing the start of this thread.
Adam Aube wrote:
> Jeff Elkins wrote:
> > To use PureVoice Converter, you must have the following:
> >
> > - Linux for x86 (any distribution or build should work)
> > - GLIBC 2.2 (e.g. RedHat RPM "glibc2.2.4-1
Jeff Elkins wrote:
> To use PureVoice Converter, you must have the following:
>
> - Linux for x86 (any distribution or build should work)
> - GLIBC 2.2 (e.g. RedHat RPM "glibc2.2.4-19.3")
> - LIBSTDC++ 2.96 (e.g. RedHat RPM "libstdc++-2.96-54")
>
&g
I'm doing some wap work and I find that I need to create some Qualcomm .qcp
files for mobile phones. I downloaded the converter and from their web page:
To use PureVoice Converter, you must have the following:
- Linux for x86 (any distribution or build should work)
- GLIBC 2.2 (e.g. R
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 10:43:26AM +0200, Michal R. Hoffmann wrote:
> Hello,
Hi. I don't see any answers from people more knowledgeable about
"policy", so I'll give it a try...
>
> after compiling 2.4.26 kernel I'm in trouble upgrading debian/unstable.
> gl
Hello,
after compiling 2.4.26 kernel I'm in trouble upgrading debian/unstable.
glibc complains about kernel subversion > 255. Well, my kernel is:
2.4.261.01.mrh -> due to policy I've read in man make-kpkg, revision
number should not contain any hyphen, special characters (onl
Hello,
I'm building glibc. I can unpack the sources with dpkg-source -x, and
build the binaries with dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -uc -us. How can I:
1. unpack the included .tar.bz2 files into the right places?
2. apply the Debian patches over state #1?
If possible, please provide a point
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 05:47:35PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Read somewhere on the web that this will somehow do some speed
> optimization.
>
> Any advice on this?
apt-get install pentium-builder
--
Pigeon
Be kind to pigeons
Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=g
Read somewhere on the web that this will somehow do some speed
optimization.
Any advice on this?
Thanks !
Message posted via www.linuxforums.org
.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 01 November 2003 16:10, Rob Weir wrote:
> "dpkg-deb -X libc6_from_debian_not_suse.deb
> /place/you/mounted/your/broken/system"
dpkg can install packages in a chrooted environment:
dpkg --root=/path/to/your/system -i libc6_from_debian.deb
Regards
Jakob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 08:19:06AM -0600, John Foster said
> I did a real dumb thing without thinking. I grabbed a .rpm of glibc
> 2.3.9 from SuSE, converted it to a .deb with alien and installed it. Of
> course I forgot that libc6 is the debian way of handeling this
> dependency
I did a real dumb thing without thinking. I grabbed a .rpm of glibc
2.3.9 from SuSE, converted it to a .deb with alien and installed it. Of
course I forgot that libc6 is the debian way of handeling this
dependency (see locales; unstable) Yeah it was VERY late.
Any way it broke the entire system
able. This doesn't work ("bad or missing command
> interpreter" (command.com)).
>
> Now it looks like I have to use the dosemu and dosemu-freedos packages
> from testing or sid (it works at a friend's who runs sid).
> How can I do this if dosemu depends on glibc-2.3.1-1?:
t; interpreter" (command.com)).
>
> Now it looks like I have to use the dosemu and dosemu-freedos packages
> from testing or sid (it works at a friend's who runs sid).
> How can I do this if dosemu depends on glibc-2.3.1-1?:
>
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent config
from testing or sid (it works at a friend's who runs sid).
How can I do this if dosemu depends on glibc-2.3.1-1?:
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of dosemu:
dosemu depends on libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1); however:
Version of libc6 on system is 2.2.5-6.
Is there a way (apt-pinning?)
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 13:14:41 -0500
Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> > it's looking for a file called gtk-config, which appears NOT to be
> > installed;
>
> You will also need libgtk1.2-dev.
Yep. After I tinkered with alot of things using "apt-get install"
Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> it's looking for a file called gtk-config, which appears NOT to be
> installed;
You will also need libgtk1.2-dev.
--
Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Philosophy, when superficially studied, excites doubt; when thoroughly
explored, it dispels it. - Francis Bacon
> > > > In attempting to ./configure , it complains about not having the
> > > > latest glibc;
> > > > checking for GLIB - version >= 1.2.6... no
> > >
> > > glib isn't the same as glibc. glibc is the name of the GNU C
> > > Libr
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:32:27PM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:40:32 -0500
> Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> > > In attempting to ./configure , it complains about not having the
> > > l
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:40:32 -0500
Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> > In attempting to ./configure , it complains about not having the
> > latest glibc;
> > checking for GLIB - version >= 1.2.6... no
>
> glib isn't
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:40:32 -0500
Nathan Poznick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> > In attempting to ./configure , it complains about not having the
> > latest glibc;
> > checking for GLIB - version >= 1.2.6... no
>
> glib isn't
Thus spake Rodney D. Myers:
> In attempting to ./configure , it complains about not having the
> latest glibc;
> checking for GLIB - version >= 1.2.6... no
glib isn't the same as glibc. glibc is the name of the GNU C Library,
packaged as libc6. glib is a library used by GTK and
I'm running Debian "sarge".
I'm trying to get sylpheed-claws installed, the latest & greatest
version.
In attempting to ./configure , it complains about not having the
latest glibc;
checking for GLIB - version >= 1.2.6... no
*** The glib-config script installed
- Forwarded message from "John H. Robinson, IV" -
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 11:38:25 -0800
From: "John H. Robinson, IV"
Subject: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Recent glibc time_t redefinition?]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
remember the time_t thing we
ave unmet dependencies:
> locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-14.3
^--^
> E: Sorry, broken packages
It looks like you are trying to install the testing version of
locales. Since you have a woody installation, check your
/etc/apt/sources.list
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 06:05:02AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
> When I try to install locales using apt-get I get:
>
> # apt-get install locales
[snip]
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> locales: D
help to resolve the situation:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
locales: Depends: glibc-2.2.5-14.3
E: Sorry, broken packages
...but if I try to install glibc-2.2.5, I get:
# apt-get install glibc-2.2.5
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency
e
> usmghdebian:~#
The Sun JDK1.3 is broken in sid now, since Sun used an internal glibc
symbol that they shouldn't have. I think someone has told me that
blackdown has released a fixed 1.3 release, otherwise you'll have to use
the 1.4 and complain to Sun :)
-rob
msg18334/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I just tried to shutdown Tomcat 4.1.12-2 using Sun JDK
1.3.1_03 on my box running unstable. I got the
following undefined symbol message and Tomcat does not
shutdown. Does anyone have a suggestion for what I
should do other than kill the Tomcat pids? I wonder if
I do that will Tomcat be able to res
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 06:19:41PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
> Is it possible to rebuild the gcc and glibc in woody with some optimized gcc
> argument? I've noticed that gentoo has a /etc/make.conf in which I can defile
glibc should work. gcc is one of the few packages that won'
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 06:19:41PM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Is it possible to rebuild the gcc and glibc in woody with some optimized gcc
> argument? I've noticed that gentoo has a /etc/make.conf in which I can defile
>
> CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gn
Hello list,
Is it possible to rebuild the gcc and glibc in woody with some optimized gcc
argument? I've noticed that gentoo has a /etc/make.conf in which I can defile
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=i686 -O3 -pipe"
is it possible for debian woody to do so to
Hi
I have 2 computers with woody installed
When I run dselect/install I get the following
First computer has locales ver. 2.2.5-11.2 (no problem)
Second computer has also locales-2.2.5-11.2 which has dependency
problems with glibc-2.2.5-11.2 apparently not found on this computer
(and of course
On 0, Gottfried Szing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig Dickson wrote:
>
> >I don't know what PSE Pro is; does it really work only on 1.3? You can't
> >use 1.4.1? What I've done for a few things is use 1.4.1 with the
> >j2ee.jar from 1.3 (since AFAIK there is still no jdk1.4-ee). I haven't
> >fo
Hi,
> The problem here is that some idiot at Sun put a call to __libc_wait
> in the JVM. __libc_wait is (was) an internal function of libc 2.2 that
> should never have been called directly from outside libc, and it no
> longer exists in libc 2.3.
> I don't know what PSE Pro is; does it really wor
Craig Dickson wrote:
I don't know what PSE Pro is; does it really work only on 1.3? You can't
use 1.4.1? What I've done for a few things is use 1.4.1 with the
j2ee.jar from 1.3 (since AFAIK there is still no jdk1.4-ee). I haven't
found this to cause any problems.
i have the same problem. but
.3.1 from Sun did not run any more:
>
> gellert@ritch:~$ javac
> Error occurred during initialization of VM
> Unable to load native library: /usr/local/java/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so:
> symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with
> link time reference
&g
load native library: /usr/local/java/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so:
symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with
link time reference
Woah. Downgrading to older glibc would have been to difficult because of
the dependencies, and yes, I do need version 1.3 of Java to use PSE Pro
I need a version of glibc that uses the GS segment register to access
pthread-local storage*. I've neither been able to find one for debian nor is it
obvious to me from looking through the sources how to compile it to use %gs.
Any suggestions welcomed.
I currently have kernel 2.4.18,
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 12:46:12PM +0200, Paul Bakker wrote:
> I have an alpha processor and distribution installed of debian 2.1.
You should really do a full upgrade through 2.2 to 3.0 - picking out
just glibc and upgrading that is possibly doable, but risky. I doubt
anyone has ever tes
101 - 200 of 463 matches
Mail list logo
