On 6/10/2011 2:11 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 21:49 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
for single user or
/
/home
/media/big - /home/$user1/big
/media/big - /home/$user2/big
For a single user I switched from / + /home to / only.
For special tasks I add e.g.
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 04:17 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 6/10/2011 2:11 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 21:49 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
for single user or
/
/home
/media/big - /home/$user1/big
/media/big - /home/$user2/big
For a single user I switched from /
On 06/11/2011 04:22 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
[snip]
I don't like to insert a CD either :).
I can't tell if you're telling a joke or being eccentric.
--
Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure
the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally
corrupt.
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 04:50 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 06/11/2011 04:22 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
[snip]
I don't like to insert a CD either :).
I can't tell if you're telling a joke or being eccentric.
Both :), kidding here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:28:32 -0700
Freeman hew...@gmail.com wrote:
The disadvantage is wasted space, since each partition has some expansion
room that equals lost contiguous bulk space. (Reading up on LVM's is on my
todo list.)
You really should, there's no reason not to use LVM, especially
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:28:26PM +0200, Andrej Kacian wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:28:32 -0700
Freeman hew...@gmail.com wrote:
The disadvantage is wasted space, since each partition has some expansion
room that equals lost contiguous bulk space. (Reading up on LVM's is on my
todo list.)
On Lu, 06 iun 11, 09:23:08, prad wrote:
in the past we've had two partitions:
/
/data
into the latter went home, www, mail and we'd softlink from the
appropriate places. the nice thing about this setup has always been that
when we upgraded or tried a different system there wasn't any data
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 21:49 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
for single user or
/
/home
/media/big - /home/$user1/big
/media/big - /home/$user2/big
For a single user I switched from / + /home to / only.
For special tasks I add e.g. /music_productions to /mnt or /home.
The advantage to have /
On Vi, 10 iun 11, 21:11:49, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
The advantage to have / only, including /home is, that you don't need
think that much about allocation of free space. You anyway can do
separated backups. And having tons of individual mounted directories
won't speed up anything or won't have
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 00:54 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Vi, 10 iun 11, 21:11:49, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
The advantage to have / only, including /home is, that you don't need
think that much about allocation of free space. You anyway can do
separated backups. And having tons of
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:23:08AM -0700, prad wrote:
in the past we've had two partitions:
/
/data
into the latter went home, www, mail and we'd softlink from the
appropriate places. the nice thing about this setup has always been that
when we upgraded or tried a different system there
in the past we've had two partitions:
/
/data
into the latter went home, www, mail and we'd softlink from the
appropriate places. the nice thing about this setup has always been that
when we upgraded or tried a different system there wasn't any data
copying to do.
now we've been experimenting
* prad p...@towardsfreedom.com [2011-06-06 09:23:08 -0700]:
in the past we've had two partitions:
/
/data
into the latter went home, www, mail and we'd softlink from the
appropriate places. the nice thing about this setup has always been that
when we upgraded or tried a different system
On 06/06/2011 11:23 AM, prad wrote:
in the past we've had two partitions:
/
/data
into the latter went home, www, mail and we'd softlink from the
appropriate places. the nice thing about this setup has always been that
when we upgraded or tried a different system there wasn't any data
copying to
14 matches
Mail list logo
