On 2023-04-08 11:31:44 -0400, songbird wrote:
> Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to limit the amount of cputime that
> > the hogging application is using?
> >
> > Google suggests that "nice" or "cpulimit" might do that.
>
> nice didn't do it. "nice -n 19" didn't make any change.
On 11/04/2023 07:12, songbird wrote:
the bios did let me turn down the temperature so we'll see
how that works next time i need to do an upload.
I am curious if it affects
/sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone*
I have never tried to do anything with this interface. I decided to look
into sysfs
songbird wrote:
> songbird wrote:
> ...
>> i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
>> but no luck yet in my searches.
>
> ...
>
> of course the moment i send the message it comes to me that
> perhaps the BIOS will let me do this, but i don't want to reboot
> at the moment
On 4/8/23 07:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well below the maximum
On 4/8/23 20:11, Mark Allums wrote:
On 4/8/2023 8:01 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 4/8/23 07:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me
Darac Marjal wrote:
> As an alternative, you could try writing a small shell
> script that works like the following (pseudocode):
>
> STOP_TEMP=70
> START_TEMP=65
> JOB_RUNNING=1
>
> while true:
>cpu_temp=$(cat /sys/something/temperature)
>
>if JOB_RUNNING and cpu_temp > STOP_TEMP:
>
On 08/04/2023 15:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well below the
On 4/8/2023 8:01 PM, David Christensen wrote:
On 4/8/23 07:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the
On 4/8/23 07:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well below the maximum
On 09/04/2023 02:17, songbird wrote:
i have an intel processor and it has the MAX which does
prevent it from going higher (100C), but i'd like to keep it
at 70C or lower.
I recommend thermald, which I use to limit my fanless 65 W i7-7700 CPU
to 80°C, passively cooled with heat pipes connected
On 9/4/23 00:56, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I recommend to go fanless whenever possible.
Computers should be silent.
I have a fanless ARM router that even in high summer has no thermal
problems (I am in Australia and I have no aircon). It does have a
massive case bonded to the CPU
I also
On Sat, 2023-04-08 at 10:17 -0400, songbird wrote:
>
> i have an intel processor and it has the MAX which does
> prevent it from going higher (100C), but i'd like to keep it
> at 70C or lower.
>
> i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
> but no luck yet in my searches.
Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
...
> Maybe don't use FTP but use rsync - that way you can come back to it
> after a while and start again at the point you left off?
i have no control over what is listening at the other
end other than i sign on.
i can limit the FTP software to fewer connections
Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> What would happen, if we started a political movement based
>> on nationalism and Unix?
>>
>> What would be the first thing we would do when we get
>> installed as government?
>
> Annex the Netherlands, and take control of ASML.
> Annex Taiwan, and take control of TSMC.
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 1:29 PM Emanuel Berg wrote:
>
> >> I recommend to go fanless whenever possible.
> >> Computers should be silent.
> >
> > Yeah, optimally ...
>
> What would happen, if we started a political movement based on
> nationalism and Unix?
>
> What would be the first thing we would
>> I recommend to go fanless whenever possible.
>> Computers should be silent.
>
> Yeah, optimally ...
What would happen, if we started a political movement based on
nationalism and Unix?
What would be the first thing we would do when we get
installed as government?
Maybe close the border or
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I recommend to go fanless whenever possible.
> Computers should be silent.
Yeah, optimally ...
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
> i have a very tiny fan and heatsink that is right on
> the processor. the rest of the system is fanless (no
> fan for the PSU - no fancy GPU needed for what i do).
> i almost bought a bigger heatsink so that the entire
> thing could run without the fan, but the small fan
> provided with the
On Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 11:43:53AM -0400, songbird wrote:
> tv.debian wrote:
> ...
> > Also modern cpu do not suffer from high temperatures as much as the cpu
> > of yore, they use up all the thermal headroom they have, then throttle
> > the frequency/power to stay at that level. Of course the
t...@myposts.ovh wrote:
...
> By using a fanner?
well-trained chipmunk?
songbird
Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Apr 2023, at 15:26, songbird wrote:
>> songbird wrote:
>> ...
>>> i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
>>> but no luck yet in my searches.
>
> Surely you don't need to set a temperature limit? If you
> do, the cpu will still run (far too
On Sat, 8 Apr 2023, at 16:39, songbird wrote:
> only with this change to the FTP software has it become
> an annoyance that made me go look for a way to deal with
> it.
>
> filing a bug against the FTP software is also something
> i should do, but i've not gotten that far yet. ;)
Meantime,
tv.debian wrote:
...
> Also modern cpu do not suffer from high temperatures as much as the cpu
> of yore, they use up all the thermal headroom they have, then throttle
> the frequency/power to stay at that level. Of course the rest of the
> system has to deal with the residual heat as well if
Emanuel Berg wrote:
...
> But install fans and see if you still get high temperatures if
> you didn't (?) ...
i have a very tiny fan and heatsink that is right on
the processor. the rest of the system is fanless (no
fan for the PSU - no fancy GPU needed for what i do).
i almost bought a bigger
davidson wrote:
...
> I would do
>
> $ man -k limit
>
> and see what looked interesting. prlimit(1) looks like it has a lot of
> switches.
ok, thanks will look at that too. :)
songbird
On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
On Sat, 8 Apr 2023, at 15:26, songbird wrote:
songbird wrote:
...
i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
but no luck yet in my searches.
Surely you don't need to set a temperature limit? If you
do, the cpu will still run (far
songbird wrote:
> i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
> become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like
> uploading files for my website). probably a bug, but it got
> me to wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to
> a range well below the maximum that kicks
On Sat, 8 Apr 2023, at 15:26, songbird wrote:
> songbird wrote:
> ...
>> i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
>> but no luck yet in my searches.
Surely you don't need to set a temperature limit? If you
do, the cpu will still run (far too much, but less than now)
up to
Le 08/04/2023 à 16:26, songbird wrote :
songbird wrote:
...
i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
but no luck yet in my searches.
...
of course the moment i send the message it comes to me that
perhaps the BIOS will let me do this, but i don't want to reboot
at
songbird wrote:
...
> i've been trying to find anything that will let me set this
> but no luck yet in my searches.
...
of course the moment i send the message it comes to me that
perhaps the BIOS will let me do this, but i don't want to reboot
at the moment to check that. will check
On 2023-04-08 22:17, songbird wrote:
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well below the
i have a program that has changed it's behavior to suddenly
become a CPU hog (while doing something simple like uploading
files for my website). probably a bug, but it got me to
wondering how i could limit the CPU temperature to a range
well below the maximum that kicks in by the CPU itself.
32 matches
Mail list logo
