o you have a typo in your Subject: line? According to
snapshot.debian.org libc5 was last seen in Debian in 2009.
> I have both libc6:i386 and lib32gcc-s1 (on an AMD 64bit machine).
> libc6-i686:i386 is tagged 'rc' transitional dummy package.
That will be sufficient to satisfy t
> I have both libc6:i386 and lib32gcc-s1 (on an AMD 64bit machine).
> libc6-i686:i386 is tagged 'rc' transitional dummy package.
libc6, or libc5? The Subject line says the latter, but AFAIK the latter
hasn't been a thing for Quite A Long While Now (if indeed at all).
What versi
Hi all,
I have a .deb package from HP (hp-health) that has this requirement, and
doesn't install because of it. It got damaged somehow during the last
dist-upgrade. I think I'd better re-install it.
I have both libc6:i386 and lib32gcc-s1 (on an AMD 64bit machine).
libc6-i686:i386 is tagged
Hi all,
I have a .deb package from HP (hp-health) that has this requirement, and
doesn't install because of it. It got damaged somehow during the last
dist-upgrade. I think I'd better re-install it.
I have both libc6:i386 and lib32gcc-s1 (on an AMD 64bit machine).
libc6-i686:i386 is tagged
it
probably doesn't make a difference to our users if we stop shipping
them.
> and I think Debian is like the only living Linux distribution out
> there still shipping libc5.
Are you sure? I would be very surprised if the "enterprise"
distributions didn't ship it as well.
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:32:41AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:33:13AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> >
> > I already proposed to remove the whole libc5 chaintools and
> > dependencies before woody release. A few users complained beca
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:33:13AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>
> I already proposed to remove the whole libc5 chaintools and
> dependencies before woody release. A few users complained because of a
> few old commercial programs (such as wordperfect and so)
> which depen
Hi all,
Debian unstable & testing still carry around libc5, and some associated
packages like altgcc, libdb1, ld.so and a few others.
Is there nowadays still a use for these packages? Does the amount of
usage warrant the efforts it take to maintain these rather outdated
packages? I get a m
#x27; be a limit but that was 'not' the real problem. It
seems that my path statement contains '/root/bin' as I keep a bunch
of scripts there that I run from my account. That dir preceeded
/usr/bin and I had an unzip file there that 'did' require libc5. ISTR
that I p
empty so I don't
> > have anything in bash* causing it. Logging out and back in doesn't
> > fix it but installing libc5 does (???). My home dir goes back 6-7
> > years and I am running woody/Sid currently. It has to be something in
> > there, I guess. Weird
Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is something screwed up with 'my' account!
"type unzip" will tell you what unzip you're running.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
The debate rages on: Is PL/I Bachtrian or Dromedary?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
ibrary 'libc.so.5'" when run
> as me but works fine when run as root. Just tried other users and it
> is OK there. Greping my home dir for unzip comes up empty so I don't
> have anything in bash* causing it. Logging out and back in doesn't
> fix it but instal
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
>
> On 28-Jun-2002 Wayne Topa wrote:
> >
> > I ran deborphan last week and removed libc5, among others. I
> > received a zip file today and found that unzip 5.50-1 from unstable
> > requires
On 28-Jun-2002 Wayne Topa wrote:
>
> I ran deborphan last week and removed libc5, among others. I
> received a zip file today and found that unzip 5.50-1 from unstable
> requires libc5 but apt-cache show unzip does not have it listed as a
> requirement.
>
> Seems odd that
I ran deborphan last week and removed libc5, among others. I
received a zip file today and found that unzip 5.50-1 from unstable
requires libc5 but apt-cache show unzip does not have it listed as a
requirement.
Seems odd that a program in unstable would require an old version libc
or am I
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 10:58:07PM -0500, Steven Butterworth wrote:
>
> I am attempting to get an old (circa 1996) Absoft F77/F90 compiler running
> under Debian Woody/Sid. I have installed the libc5, xlib6 and alt-gcc
> packages. The Absoft f77 compiler runs, as does the Motif fron
Hi All,
I am attempting to get an old (circa 1996) Absoft F77/F90 compiler running
under Debian Woody/Sid. I have installed the libc5, xlib6 and alt-gcc
packages. The Absoft f77 compiler runs, as does the Motif front-end to the
debugger; so I think the run-time aspect of things is working fine
Hi there,
Has anyone tried to use IPMASQADM to get PPTP support in IPMASQ (so I can
access my work VPN from behind the linux firewall)? I downloaded the
IPMASQADM module as well as a new version of libc5 (required by IPMASQADM)
and basically killed a shitload of stuff on my server. I'm gue
p-server with old packages and a bootdisk?
>
> The last version of Debian completely based on libc5 was bo (Debian
> 1.3), but everything up to and including the current unstable
> distribution has libc5 support packages at least for i386. 'apt-get
> install libc5' will get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I need an old debian based in libv5, i don't know wich version of debian was
>the last based on this library.
>Has somebody a link to an iso-image for downloading?
>Or a ftp-server with old packages and a bootdisk?
The last version of Debian complete
I think you'll simply need to apt-get libc5 to get this working ... not ?
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Rath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 29 maart 2001 17:23
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: old debian with libc5
hi,
I need an old debian based in libv5, i
hi,
I need an old debian based in libv5, i don't know wich version of debian was
the last based on this library.
Has somebody a link to an iso-image for downloading?
Or a ftp-server with old packages and a bootdisk?
thanks, andi
Corey Popelier wrote:
> > > What's with the tendency all of a sudden for Woody packages to be
> > > dependent on Libc5? Only reason I noticed this was I've always avoided
> > > installing Libc5, but in the past few days more and more packages have
> &g
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 10:42:07AM +0800, Corey Popelier wrote:
> What's with the tendency all of a sudden for Woody packages to be
> dependent on Libc5? Only reason I noticed this was I've always avoided
> installing Libc5, but in the past few days more and more packages have
Joey Hess wrote:
> Corey Popelier wrote:
> > What's with the tendency all of a sudden for Woody packages to be
> > dependent on Libc5? Only reason I noticed this was I've always avoided
> > installing Libc5, but in the past few days more and more packages have
>
Corey Popelier wrote:
> What's with the tendency all of a sudden for Woody packages to be
> dependent on Libc5? Only reason I noticed this was I've always avoided
> installing Libc5, but in the past few days more and more packages have
> become dependent on it, limiting my op
What's with the tendency all of a sudden for Woody packages to be
dependent on Libc5? Only reason I noticed this was I've always avoided
installing Libc5, but in the past few days more and more packages have
become dependent on it, limiting my options somewhat :)
Anyone know the reaso
"Liam Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I decided to see if asking APT to install the libc5 package in
> simulate mode would suggest the removal of libc6 and it doesn't,
> which suggests I could simply install the libc5 package. However, I'm
> too scared
Hi,
I am having problems with mp3enc (not a Debian package - commercial
product) which wants libc5 libraries:
ldd mp3enc31
libm.so.5 => not found
libc.so.5 => not found
I am not mad enough to mess with libc versions lightly :-)
I decided to see if asking APT to insta
lect which version of the compiler I want to install anyway), but I
> don't know how hard this is, and whether it might break my system.
>
> Does anyone have any views on this? They'd be appreciated (and
> especially if mailed directly!).
install libc5 (in the
Hi!
I want to install Lahey's fortran 95 compiler in my debian box.
This is a vanilla (ish!) potato box which works fine. However, there is
a little catch: the installer (which takes a key and licences the
software, copies the files and so on) is a shell script that calls some
programs. The
Netscape. The author has this
>to say:
>
>-- snip --
>Apr 11: I finally found out what is up with Debian. They ship a libc5
>Netscape, but glibc2 devel tools.
Mm, have you tried installing the libc6 Netscape packages instead? As of
a couple of months ago, there ar
:
-- snip --
Apr 11: I finally found out what is up with Debian. They ship a libc5
Netscape, but glibc2 devel tools. To get muttzilla to work on Debian
you either need to build a libc5 based muttzilla or install a glibc2
based Netscape. I'll try to put up some more tho
We had a working 2.1 system, and by mistake an intern got libc5 and
un-tar'ed it.
This killed the system, as dynamic loading libraries seemed to get trashed.
We tried to recover by booting to a 2.1 CDrom, hoping to then dselect
re-install the good libc6, but it had a lot of weird errors
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 22:27:49 +0100, Vitux wrote:
> It says Linux2.0(libc5). I'm running Slink, standard 2.0.36 krnl.
Slink defaults to libc6, but can run libc5 applications using the libraries
in the "oldlibs" section of the archive.
HTH,
Ray
--
Cyberspace, a final front
Newbie Q, I know. Just making sure, before d'l-ing
15Mb Netscape 4.72.
It says Linux2.0(libc5). I'm running Slink,
standard 2.0.36 krnl.
Regards
Vitux
--
Death comes to us in various guises,
swiftly changing as a baby's mood...
Debian GNU/Linux
Micro$loth-free Zone
>
> You will find that a lot of programs are compiled against libc5 since it
> should exist on all linux machines. If you have a glibc2.1 binary you
> must have glibc 2.1 installed on your system. For instance, Debian is
^
The libc development forked early on in the linux development, as GNU
libc wasn't useable on linux systems. This was rectified in glibc 2.0,
however the linux libc was up to v5, so glibc is sometimes called libc6.
You will find that a lot of programs are compiled against libc5 since it
s
On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 02:09:20AM -0600, David J. Kanter wrote:
> What's the purpose of these files? And is the older version of glibc
> (version 2.0, right?) synonymous with libc5, and the newer version of glibc
> (2.2?) synonymous with libc6?
2.0 == libc5, 2.1 == glibc , 2.2 =
its all libc ..
glibc i believe is just "GNU" Libc (but i could be wrong)
libc5 = obsolete, but still used by many programs like netscape, real
audio/video, star office, xview ..and many more..most of them either not
maintained very well or not maintained at all. the authors find it
What's the purpose of these files? And is the older version of glibc
(version 2.0, right?) synonymous with libc5, and the newer version of glibc
(2.2?) synonymous with libc6?
I'm a little confused because I thought my system was pretty up-to-date, but
when I tried to remove libc5, dsel
4.51/Export, 27-Feb-99; (c) 1995-1998 Netscape Communications Corp.
p1 $ ldd ./netscape.old
libXt.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libXt.so.6 (0x4000b000)
libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/libc5-compat/libSM.so.6 (0x4004d000)
l
This should be a simple question. i think i'm just too dumb to see the
answer! *grin*
I'm trying to compile bsvc (a 68k compiler/simulator) under libc5 as
the result of problems with libc6 compiles (the author tells me he's
gonna fix it for libc6, but does know when and i can'
Bob Nielsen wrote:
> Huh? I noticed that navigator was updated a few days ago, but it is
> seems to use both libc5 and libc6:
>
> Those libs don't show up here either, but navigator still runs just fine
> for me (some people seem to have problems with the libc6 vers
Huh? I noticed that navigator was updated a few days ago, but it is
seems to use both libc5 and libc6:
$ ldd /usr/lib/netscape/461/navigator/navigator-smotif.real
libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x40005000)
libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x40
Hi,
I am running/testing potato. Most things work fine, but a few days ago
netscape was replaced by a new version using libc5. However, this version
crashes on my machine with a buserror. Doing ldd on the binary
indicates that libg++.so.27 and libstdc++.so.27 are not found. At first
the were not
Hi there,
I was wondering what would I need to do in order to compile a
software I've got here linked to libc5 and not to libc6... I assume that
just editing the Makefiles and changing 'gcc' for 'altgcc' would be much
of a naive try, wouldn't it? What should I
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 17:59:13 +0200, Nikolaus A Siegfried wrote:
> libg++.so.27 => /usr/lib/libg++.so.27 (0x40125000)
This is from the libg++272 package; for use with libc6. Install the
libg++27 package which has this library for use with libc5.
HTH,
Ray
--
LEADERSHIP A form o
I am trying to use a statistical package, XploRe, which uses
libc5. the program is only available as a binary from
www.xplore-stat.de. On the current Debian release it
finishes with
Regex Error: Memory exhausted
Aborted
ldd gives
# ldd xpl4.exe
libXpm.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc5-com
ction
LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libBrokenLocale.so.1 $netscape "$@"
then i tried to install libc5 in case navigator-smotif-407 uses
netscape's libc5 tarball..
consigliori:/lib# apt-get install libc5
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Sorry, libc5 i
Athanasius wrote:
>
> Hi, saw your message on the debian list, just have a question, hope you
> don't mind. Did Netscape also have problems after you removed libc5? When
> I got libc6, it took out both wordperfect and netscape. Unlike yours,
> however, mine said that it co
Thanks Bob!
That did the trick. I only had the libc5 package loaded. When I loaded
the xlib6 and xpm4.7 everything started working again.
Thanks again for your help!
Doug
Bob Nielsen wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Feb 1999, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> &
g
> the dselect thing, but when I finished, my wordperfect 8 nolonger
> functioned. The error message was can'tload library libXt.so.6. I used
> locate which had its database from before the change and I found that I
> had that file (and a bunch of other ones) in the /usr/lib/libc5-c
. The error message was can'tload library libXt.so.6. I used
locate which had its database from before the change and I found that I
had that file (and a bunch of other ones) in the /usr/lib/libc5-compat
directory. The libXt.so.6 file was no longer there.
Well, in my infinate wisdom, :) I
Hi Phil,
I finally got netscape going. It does use the libc5 libraries. I needed
to install the xpm4.7 package to provide the missing libXpm.so.4 library
(from /oldlibs/), and set LD_LIBRARY_PATH to search
/usr/lib/libc5-compat first. But it then worked fine.
Cheers, Chris.
Multi wrote
> Hi,
> I have followed the netscape installation instructions (generic linux)
> and all is unpacked and the install script completes OK. But netscape
> will not run. It is missing the libraries libg++.so.27 and
> libstdc++.so.27. These are present on my Debian system (2.0) in
Hi,
I have followed the netscape installation instructions (generic linux)
and all is unpacked and the install script completes OK. But netscape
will not run. It is missing the libraries libg++.so.27 and
libstdc++.so.27. These are present on my Debian system (2.0) in
usr/lib/libc5-compat
I found that I needed the
> latest ppp package as well. After many painful attempts I could not get these
> packages to install so this lead me to finding the entire dist. Well, none of
> the packages will install because they apparently depend on libc6, but this
> conflicts with libc5
Install the libc5 from the "oldlibs" section in hamm.
Then you will be able to install libc6.
libc6 conflicts with the libc5 in bo, but not with the one in hamm.
t get
these packages to install so this lead me to finding the entire dist. Well, none
of the packages will install because they apparently depend on libc6, but this
conflicts with libc5 which some of the other apps depend on. In fact, dpkg
wouldnt even let me remove libc5 because of this. Is it
>
>
>
> > >
> > > I have libstdc++2.8 and 2.9 installed. Where can I find these old
> > > libraries (2.7) ??
> >
> > Old libraries are in the `oldlibs' section of Debian (hmm, maybe we need
> > a better name, more descriptive ...;)
>
> Thanks for responding.
>
> The description is fine, but
>
> Hi,
>
> I have an e-mail client "arrow" which comes in two flavors: one for
> libc5 and one for glibc. I have libc5 as well as libc6 installed. Any of
> the two arrow-versions complains at startup about either
> "libstdc++.so.2.7.2" or "libst
Hi,
I have an e-mail client "arrow" which comes in two flavors: one for
libc5 and one for glibc. I have libc5 as well as libc6 installed. Any of
the two arrow-versions complains at startup about either
"libstdc++.so.2.7.2" or "libstdc++.so.27".
I have libstdc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Major A wrote:
> I came across the same problem as some of you trying to run libc5 programs
> on debian. The problem is not solved by simply getting a libc6 version of
> the program, as for a number of programs such a version si
Hi there,
I came across the same problem as some of you trying to run libc5 programs
on debian. The problem is not solved by simply getting a libc6 version of
the program, as for a number of programs such a version simply does not
exist.
The problem is that libc5 programs that use libXt.so.6 or
ies wirh "can't load libc5.so.m" (same with startx).
SuSE is still libc5 based. Either get the glibc binaries from
ftp.xfree86.org (besser solution) or install libc5 (faster solution)
> I don't know anything about compatibilty (libc5 <--> libc6). Please
> point me in
Is there any documentation on getting old libc5 programs to work?
It took me a long time to stumble across the information that I need
files from the "oldlibs" section to make things work, but I still can't
get many programs to run. Specifically, I can't get libc5 X pr
Hi,
Configuration: XFree 86 3.3.2 and Matrox G200 video card
I downloaded xmatrox-2.2-0.i386.rpm from XSuSE, converted it to
debian package with alien and unpacked xsuseconfig. Then I ran
xf86config but it dies wirh "can't load libc5.so.m" (same with startx).
I have mostly SLI
On Tue, Jan 12, 1999 at 03:33:13PM -0700, Scott Scriven wrote:
> Hello..
>
> I'm using Debian 2.0 i386 (hamm), and can't get libc5 programs to run.
>
> The libc5 package is installed, and I've tried upgrading to the most
> recent frozen version. It hasn't h
Hello..
I'm using Debian 2.0 i386 (hamm), and can't get libc5 programs to run.
The libc5 package is installed, and I've tried upgrading to the most
recent frozen version. It hasn't helped.
Every libc5 program gets a segfault at startup, and gdb tells me it
crashes in t
On 31 Dec 1998, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Ryan Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now, how, if possible, can one get this binary running? I imagine
>that I need a libtermcap2 built/linked with libc6. Does such a debian
>package exists? Or do I need to go find the sources and built
On Thu, Dec 31, 1998 at 10:18:29AM -0600, Ryan Kirkpatrick wrote:
> PS. This is better than thier previous Eval kit they had up until
> just recently... Zmagic binaries linked with libc4! :(
It would probably be easier to get those running though :-)
Just grab libc4 and a few other things fr
Ryan Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Now, how, if possible, can one get this binary running? I imagine
that I need a libtermcap2 built/linked with libc6. Does such a debian
package exists? Or do I need to go find the sources and built it myself?
AFAIK there is no libtermc
I have a binary that is linked with both libc6 and libtermcap2
that I am trying to get running. I tried installing the termcap-compat
debian package, and that provide the binary with the needed libtermcap
library. Unfortuntely, since libtermcap was built and linked using libc5
(as stated
Hi,
As suggested I installed altgcc package and still could not compile the
program. The compiler complains about the undefined size of a variable.
I traced this to struct fd_set. The following code compiles on a bo box,
but not on a hamm box.
#include
#include
int main(void)
{
struct fd_set
On Tue, Nov 24, 1998 at 15:23:27 +0530, XRDLAB wrote:
> I wanted to compile a program on my hamm machine and ran into some problems.
> I found that the reason for the errors were due to libc5 dependency of the
> program. I installed libc5-altdev package and tried to compile the program
&
Hi,
I wanted to compile a program on my hamm machine and ran into some problems.
I found that the reason for the errors were due to libc5 dependency of the
program. I installed libc5-altdev package and tried to compile the program
with the following command line:
gcc -nostdinc -I/usr/i486
either (the same error
> message).
> rainer 18:21:21$ ldd /usr/local/maple/bin_IBM_INTEL_LINUX/xmaplev5
> libXt.so.6 => /usr/openwin/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x4000b000)
This is strange. All the libc5 X libraries I'm aware of install in
/usr/lib/libc5-compat, not /usr/openwin/lib ;
After upgrading from bo to hamm, xmaple did not work any more (the command
line tool maple did work). The error message was "Segmentation fault" :-(
Further I noticed, that netscape 4.07 did not work either (the same error
message).
Could anybody guess what is wrong or tell me how to find out
Hi
A while ago I wrote about setting up ML on my system. I am running 1.3.1
and have libc5 installed (ver 5.4.33-3). In trying to install sml-nj, dpkg
tells me that I need libc6 (>=2.0.7u). Will I have problems if I install
libc6? Will this conflict with libc5, will it over write
Hi
A while ago I wrote about setting up ML on my system. I am running 1.3.1
and have libc5 installed (ver 5.4.33-3). In trying to install sml-nj, dpkg
tells me that I need libc6 (>=2.0.7u). Will I have problems if I install
libc6? Will this conflict with libc5, will it over write
Hi,
Just a few q's about why I should upgrade to hamm (Debain 2.0).
Are there any issues on what software I can and can't run when doing the
libc5-libc6 upgrade? I know this is an old subject, but i've never
really got a plain english answer as to what are the i
How can libc5 version of X windows libraries be added to a Debian 2.0
system (which is based on libc6)?
I've upgrading to Debian 2.0 (from Debian 1.3) by installing Debian 2.0
from scratch on a new root partition, and setting up pieces individually
(e.g., PPP) to match my 1.3 system.
I
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 1998 at 03:44:13PM +, Andy Spiegl wrote:
> > I want to build binaries of a c++ program which has to run on a
> > libc5 based Linux. I installed these packages:
> > libc5-altdev
> > libdl1-altdev
> > ldso
> > because their desc
On Wed, Oct 21, 1998 at 03:44:13PM +, Andy Spiegl wrote:
> I want to build binaries of a c++ program which has to run on a
> libc5 based Linux. I installed these packages:
> libc5-altdev
> libdl1-altdev
> ldso
> because their descriptions say they are needed for this
Hi!
I want to build binaries of a c++ program which has to run on a
libc5 based Linux. I installed these packages:
libc5-altdev
libdl1-altdev
ldso
because their descriptions say they are needed for this task.
But now I can't find any information on how to use them.
Could some kind
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 02:36:28AM +0300, Alex Shnitman wrote:
> Why does it try to link the libraries from /usr/X11R6/lib? When I try to
> run it it naturally segfaults. Are the paths hard-coded into the binary?
Probably; check by doing "objdump --allheaders mule" to see if there's an
RPATH entry
been able to
find a newer deb, and I failed compiling it myself - it just won't go
with the includes, it apparently needs a lot of fixing before it would
compile with glibc.
Now, I've never had any problem running libc5 applications, including
the libc5 Netscape, until I stumbled upon this
d without big problems. However the myself
>compiled programs, after the upgrading, do not run anymore. The programs
>stop with SIGSEGV signal after calling to getpid().
In all likeliness, this is because the dynamic loader cannot find the libc5
version of a library your program is linked agai
s, after the upgrading, do not run anymore. The programs stop with
SIGSEGV signal
after calling to getpid(). So, I decided compile the ld.so library
For compile the ld.so library the Makefile call to the program
/usr/i486-linuxlibc1/bin/gcc
and need the sharedlib.h header. These f
On Tue, Sep 01, 1998 at 05:38:42PM +0200, Thomas Gebhardt wrote:
> obviously it is still possible to run (most) of the old libc5 binaries in
> hamm. Somehow ld knows when it is necessary to use the libs from the
ld.so, not ld.
> libc5-compat directory. How does this mechanism work?
ELF
Hi,
obviously it is still possible to run (most) of the old libc5
binaries in hamm. Somehow ld knows when it is necessary to use
the libs from the libc5-compat directory. How does this
mechanism work?
I have a program that segfaults; obviously it tries to use both
libc5 *and* libc6:
$ ldd
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On a Hamm and later system how do I compile against libc5 and its
>headers?
Install the altdev packages, and then set your path to include
/usr/i486-linuxlibc1/bin first:
export PATH=/usr/i486-linuxlibc1/bin:$PA
On a Hamm and later system how do I compile against libc5 and its
headers?
--
=
Linux, because I'd like to *get there* today
havn't upgraded it on your own...then you are most
probably using debian version 1.3 (AKA "bo")
The current "stable" version is 2.0 (hamm)
> I ran deselect and it refused to install the necessary libc6 library because
> it was in conflict with the required libc5 lib
Hello,
I installed Debian Linux 2.0.29 and wanted to add support for ppp. I ran
deselect and it refused to install the necessary libc6 library because it was
in conflict with the required libc5 library.
How can I nevertheless install ppp support.
Thank you,
Yves Van de Weyer.
If you want to run E, I recommend moving on up to hamm (or slink).
Otherwise, you have to compile your own version of the following (in
order):
libz
libtiff
libpng
libjpeg
either libgif or libungif
Imlib
Fnlib
Enlightenment
If you want to -- go for it. Frankly give it up and move on to Hamm.
I
I'm still running the crusty ol' bo (1.3.1) Debian release. I'd like
to install the Enlightenment window manager, but the only .deb package
I can find is libc6-based (and bo is libc5).
I tried installing from scratch, but that just didn't work.
Any hints?
Thanks!
--
U
On Fri, 24 Jul 1998, John McPeek wrote:
> I just down loaded and installed the 2.0 release. I got though the
> install and selected the standard package for dselect to install. After
> hours of down load time I get the message that perl cant be installed
> because of a libc5
I just down loaded and installed the 2.0 release. I got though the
install and selected the standard package for dselect to install. After
hours of down load time I get the message that perl cant be installed
because of a libc5 conflict and shortly there after I got pages of
similar errors
1 - 100 of 371 matches
Mail list logo
