sorry bout the long delay my mail server decided to die
on me a couple days ago..copy/pasted your reply from
the archives.
GNU Zebra :)
i'll check that out.
Oh, and I have good news: in my *limited* testing, your trick with the
metrics works fine: I remotely disabled one of the internet connec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>
> > Generally BGP is the way to do it.
>
> BGP is outta the question for me..i asked cisco about that a couple
> months ago and they said 128MB was minimum for BGP on routers.
And that's no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> how does that work though? the rest of the world has to know how to
> route to you..without that information i cant imagine a thing in the
> world you can do on a server to advertise you :)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> No workarounds. Policy routing :)
how does that work though? the rest of the world has to
know how to route to you..without that information
i cant imagine a thing in the world you can do on a
server to advertise you :)
i can't believe this is such a diff
>
> hi ya...
>
> think theres lot's of folks with dual t1...
>
> for outgoing traffic... think the routing and metrics might work..
yeah all im concerned about is outgoing traffic.
> for incoming traffic... we'd need all kidns of whacky work arounds
>or an autonmous ip# routable by either
>
> hi ya aphro/phil
>
> this same almost exact same concept just went thru the firewall
> mailing list
> - same conclusions...
>
> their ideas is to let the routers do the NATing
> and "Load balance the external routes using EIGRP or OSPF"
yeah my routers do NAT already. and i do
> Generally BGP is the way to do it.
BGP is outta the question for me..i asked cisco about that
a couple months ago and they said 128MB was minimum for BGP
on routers..my routers have 8MB each ..
> I think it can but only if your routers send out RIP packets :) If
> they don't, can't, or whate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>
> hi ya...
>
> think theres lot's of folks with dual t1...
Or dual DSL, or DSL + Cable modem, or dual DSL + Cable modem (like I have
at work).
> for outgoing traffic... think the routing a
hi ya...
think theres lot's of folks with dual t1...
for outgoing traffic... think the routing and metrics might work..
for incoming traffic... we'd need all kidns of whacky work arounds
or an autonmous ip# routable by either isp...
- who's writing this howto ???
-- UUnet also has a backup
hi ya aphro/phil
this same almost exact same concept just went thru the firewall
mailing list
- same conclusions...
their ideas is to let the routers do the NATing
and "Load balance the external routes using EIGRP or OSPF"
search the firewall archives for:
http://lists.gna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> hi.
>
> i have this setup on 2 machines
>
>
> Machine A
> \ eth0 ---> Switch --> Router A(65.xxx.xx.x.x) --> Internet
> \ eth1 --> Switch --> Router B (63.xx.x.x.x.x) --> Internet
>
> Machin
hi.
i have this setup on 2 machines
Machine A
\ eth0 ---> Switch --> Router A(65.xxx.xx.x.x) --> Internet
\ eth1 --> Switch --> Router B (63.xx.x.x.x.x) --> Internet
Machine B
\ eth0 --> Switch --> Router A (65.xx.x.x.x.x) --> internet
\ eth1 --> Switch --> Router B (63.xx.x.x.x) --> internet
12 matches
Mail list logo
