On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:52:02AM +0100, local10 wrote:
> Nov 6, 2022, 06:47 by dev@yandex.ru:
>
> > But if i delete "openoffice.org-unbundled" from libreoffice-common conflict
> > string Apache OpenOffice install and work fine!
> >
> >
> > May
On 2022-11-06 at 05:52, local10 wrote:
> Nov 6, 2022, 06:47 by dev@yandex.ru:
>
>> But if i delete "openoffice.org-unbundled" from libreoffice-common
>> conflict string Apache OpenOffice install and work fine!
>>
>>
>> Maybe libreoffice
Nov 6, 2022, 06:47 by dev@yandex.ru:
> But if i delete "openoffice.org-unbundled" from libreoffice-common conflict
> string Apache OpenOffice install and work fine!
>
>
> Maybe libreoffice-common not need "openoffice.org-unbundled" in conflict
&
Package: libreoffice-common
Version: 1:7.0.4-4+deb11u3
Hello!
I can not install lLbreOffice from repo and Apache OpenOffice from
openoffice.org together
Package "libreoffice-common" conflict with openoffice deb packages
In libreoffice-common package
INFO file (debian/control) confl
I have complete the task using galculator manually
Thanks anyway!
On Fri, 9/18/15, David Wright wrote:
Subject: Re: how to sum a column in openoffice calc
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Friday, September 18, 2015, 11:06 PM
It was
Quoting Li Wei (root...@yahoo.com):
> I don't have Excel
> I open the file with oocalc
It was suggested in Carl Fink's posting
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2015/09/msg00743.html
that the numbers that you are trying to sum are not numbers at all.
Could you check that out and respond. It wou
I don't have Excel
I open the file with oocalc
sort it and select part of it
then copy/paste to a new file in oocalc
On Fri, 9/18/15, Curt wrote:
Subject: Re: how to sum a column in openoffice calc
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: F
On 2015-09-17, Li Wei wrote:
> I have not realized the problem is so difficult
> I'd rather do manual calculation, it's one-time task
> The file is paste from a Excel file
I know how you feel. Have you tried opening the
Excel file directly in Open Office Calc?
Li Wei wrote:
> I have not realized the problem is so difficult
> I'd rather do manual calculation, it's one-time task
> The file is paste from a Excel file
Pasting from an Excel file looks odd to me, I guess it gives
unpredictable results.
Better open the Excel file with LO and paste it from ther
I have not realized the problem is so difficult
I'd rather do manual calculation, it's one-time task
The file is paste from a Excel file
Thanks anyway!
On Thu, 9/17/15, Siard wrote:
I can see it now. N1:N8 do not contain numbers; they
contain
a
Li Wei wrote:
> I have attach the calc file, it's in Chinese, (sorry)
> my question is how to display sum(N1:N8) in cell N9
I can see it now. N1:N8 do not contain numbers; they contain
alphanumeric strings. If you select N1, then this is what you see in
the formula bar: '-755.68
The apostroph i
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 14:13 -0700, Li Wei wrote:
> Thanks to all those who reply!
>
> I have prefix equal sign, but it doesn't work
> I have attach the calc file, it's in Chinese, (sorry)
> my question is how to display sum(N1:N8) in cell N9
Hi,
There are also mailing lists specifically for Libr
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:27:12PM +0200, Floris wrote:
> What is your decimal separator?
>
> Go to Tools --> Options --> language Settings --> Languages
>
> Because when I replace the dots, with a comma the formula
> =SUM(N1:N8) works
Interestingly, on my system the items in those cells are no
Op Wed, 16 Sep 2015 23:13:34 +0200 schreef Li Wei :
Thanks to all those who reply!
I have prefix equal sign, but it doesn't work
I have attach the calc file, it's in Chinese, (sorry)
my question is how to display sum(N1:N8) in cell N9
Thanks!
What is your decimal separator?
Go to Tools --
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 03:12:22PM +0200, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 06:02 -0700, Li Wei wrote:
> > I want sum of a column of values
> > I enter "SUM(N1:N8)" in cell N9
> > but can't get cell N9 to display sum
> >
> > Thanks in advance!!!
> >
> > PS: I'm in China and can't use
On 2015-09-16, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 September 2015 16:26:58 Curt wrote:
>> On 2015-09-16, Lars Noodén wrote:
>> > Wouldn't that be "=SUM(N1:N8)" instead, with an equal sign?
>>
>> That works for me.
>>
>> I just hit that Greek letter (epsilon?).
>
> I don't know the actual thing, b
On Wednesday 16 September 2015 16:26:58 Curt wrote:
> On 2015-09-16, Lars Noodén wrote:
> > Wouldn't that be "=SUM(N1:N8)" instead, with an equal sign?
>
> That works for me.
>
> I just hit that Greek letter (epsilon?).
I don't know the actual thing, but it is much more likely to be upper case
s
On 2015-09-16, Lars Noodén wrote:
>>
> Wouldn't that be "=SUM(N1:N8)" instead, with an equal sign?
>
That works for me.
I just hit that Greek letter (epsilon?).
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 06:02 -0700, Li Wei wrote:
> I want sum of a column of values
> I enter "SUM(N1:N8)" in cell N9
> but can't get cell N9 to display sum
>
> Thanks in advance!!!
>
> PS: I'm in China and can't use google to find answer
Hi,
See
https://help.libreoffice.org/Writer/Calculating
On 09/16/2015 04:02 PM, Li Wei wrote:
> I want sum of a column of values
> I enter "SUM(N1:N8)" in cell N9
> but can't get cell N9 to display sum
>
> Thanks in advance!!!
>
> PS: I'm in China and can't use google to find answer
>
>
Wouldn't that be "=SUM(N1:N8)" instead, with an equal sign?
Re
gt; > infrastructure and my boss is happy with it. I guess we are a
> successful
> > case of open software use in the "real world"
>
> I do support for many of such firms.
>
> > But -of course, there is always an issue- my users keep compl
en software use in the "real world"
>
> I do support for many of such firms.
>
> > But -of course, there is always an issue- my users keep complaining
> > about OpenOffice migration to Libre Office. They even complain if I
> > change OO from 3.2 to 3.3. I believe th
rt for many of such firms.
> But -of course, there is always an issue- my users keep complaining
> about OpenOffice migration to Libre Office. They even complain if I
> change OO from 3.2 to 3.3. I believe there were major changes in that
> version.
>
> The question is: Is there any w
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:49:57 +0200
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> To be honest, I also thought that it was written in Java until
> recently ( well, I think I discovered that in the beginning of the
> year ), but someday I said that on a forum and was instantly replied
> that it was written
Le 10.10.2013 10:24, Joe a écrit :
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:21:29 +0200
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 09.10.2013 23:04, Joe a écrit :
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 12:52:43 -0300
> Ezequiel wrote:
>
>> Thanks to all for your replies. I am actually pinning OO in order
>> to use oldstable versi
On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:21:29 +0200
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Le 09.10.2013 23:04, Joe a écrit :
> > On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 12:52:43 -0300
> > Ezequiel wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks to all for your replies. I am actually pinning OO in order
> >> to use oldstable versions. I guess I will try to c
On 10/10/13, Ezequiel wrote:
> Thanks to all for your replies. I am actually pinning OO in order to use
> oldstable versions. I guess I will try to compile it an make my own repos.
> You were very helpfull.
>
> I'm not giving up convincing my users, but I know it's a hopeless fight :P
Never hopel
Le 09.10.2013 23:04, Joe a écrit :
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 12:52:43 -0300
Ezequiel wrote:
Thanks to all for your replies. I am actually pinning OO in order to
use oldstable versions. I guess I will try to compile it an make my
own repos. You were very helpfull.
Bear in mind that OOo and LO use J
On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 12:52:43 -0300
Ezequiel wrote:
> Thanks to all for your replies. I am actually pinning OO in order to
> use oldstable versions. I guess I will try to compile it an make my
> own repos. You were very helpfull.
>
Bear in mind that OOo and LO use Java for various purposes, and J
infrastructure and my boss is happy with it. I guess we are a
>>> successful case of open software use in the "real world"
>>>
>>> But -of course, there is always an issue- my users keep complaining
>>> about OpenOffice migration to Libre Office. They even compl
world"
But -of course, there is always an issue- my users keep complaining
about OpenOffice migration to Libre Office. They even complain if I
change OO from 3.2 to 3.3. I believe there were major changes in
that
version.
The question is: Is there any way of freezing OO version
indefinet
users keep complaining
about OpenOffice migration to Libre Office. They even complain if I
change OO from 3.2 to 3.3. I believe there were major changes in that
version.
The question is: Is there any way of freezing OO version indefinetly?
I am currently using oldstable OO but I guess my time is g
users keep complaining
about OpenOffice migration to Libre Office. They even complain if I
change OO from 3.2 to 3.3. I believe there were major changes in that
version.
The question is: Is there any way of freezing OO version indefinetly?
I am currently using oldstable OO but I guess my tim
Hi all:
I am Sysadmin at a small business. We have a complete
mail-web-vpninfrastructure and my boss is happy with it. I guess we
are a successful
case of open software use in the "real world"
But -of course, there is always an issue- my users keep complaining about
OpenOffice migratio
Here's the URL for my OO posting:
http://www.oooforum.org/forum/viewtopic.phtml?p=536651#536651
This may be related to a problem I had years ago with the page
format for a No.10 envelope. Once I got the working combination
of Landscape/Portrait and other factors in synch between the
printer and
On Wed 15 May 2013 at 17:36:33 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 07:37:36PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 14 May 2013 at 11:03:14 -0400, George Langford, Sc.D. wrote:
> >
> > > Here's a crossover problem.
> > >
> > > Document prints with a spurious letter in upper left han
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 07:37:36PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 14 May 2013 at 11:03:14 -0400, George Langford, Sc.D. wrote:
>
> > Here's a crossover problem.
> >
> > Document prints with a spurious letter in upper left hand corner of image:
>
> Intriguing!
>
> > 1. On debian PC running squeeze
On Tue 14 May 2013 at 11:03:14 -0400, George Langford, Sc.D. wrote:
> Here's a crossover problem.
>
> Document prints with a spurious letter in upper left hand corner of image:
Intriguing!
> 1. On debian PC running squeeze, only since recent apt-get update.
By design Squeeze is stable, so the
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:03:14AM -0400, George Langford, Sc.D. wrote:
> Document prints with a spurious letter in upper left hand corner of image:
>
> 1. On debian PC running squeeze, only since recent apt-get update.
> 2. On WinXPSP3 laptop, the same document prints perfectly with the
> same p
Here's a crossover problem.
Document prints with a spurious letter in upper left hand corner of image:
1. On debian PC running squeeze, only since recent apt-get update.
2. On WinXPSP3 laptop, the same document prints perfectly with the
same printer.
Prints the extra letter whether on a No.1
On Sat, 12 May 2012 18:26:58 +0800, lina wrote:
> I have a file like:
>
> aaa
> (1) morning
> (2) noon
> (3) afternoon
>
> when I press the return key "enter" to start a new line, I don't expect
> it to be (4).
(...)
Check the suggestions here (mainly the #4 comment):
[LibreOffice] Turn off a
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 6:37 PM, wrote:
> lina writes:
>
> > Hi,
>>
> > I have a file like:
>>
> > aaa
> > (1) morning
> > (2) noon
> > (3) afternoon
>>
> > when I press the return key "enter" to start a new line, I don't
> > expect it to be (4).
>>
> > How can I avoid it. I turned the
lina writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have a file like:
>
> aaa
> (1) morning
> (2) noon
> (3) afternoon
>
> when I press the return key "enter" to start a new line, I don't
> expect it to be (4).
>
> How can I avoid it. I turned the numbering off still not work. so
> weird, google told me I may try
Hi,
I have a file like:
aaa
(1) morning
(2) noon
(3) afternoon
when I press the return key "enter" to start a new line, I don't
expect it to be (4).
How can I avoid it. I turned the numbering off still not work. so
weird, google told me I may try "Tools"-> "Outline numbering" ->
numebr "None".
Thanks for those replies.
I will try to probe the logic of the ruler
and tab system, hopefully
finding a practical way to repeat that fill
pattern in some 90 lines.
Regards,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 05:08:39PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> On 09/19/2011 05:16 PM, Joel Roth wrote:
> >Hi Debianolog
On 09/19/2011 05:16 PM, Joel Roth wrote:
Hi Debianologists,
Many word processors can fill to the right margin
with a repeated character (often dot or underscore).
I think the technical term is 'leadering'.
Does anyone know how to do it in OOW?
Thanks
click on the ruler where you want y
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:16:17 -1000
Joel Roth dijo:
>Hi Debianologists,
>
>Many word processors can fill to the right margin
>with a repeated character (often dot or underscore).
>
>I think the technical term is 'leadering'.
>
>Does anyone know how to do it in OOW?
Create a tab at the rightmost e
On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 12:16 -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
> Hi Debianologists,
>
> Many word processors can fill to the right margin
> with a repeated character (often dot or underscore).
>
> I think the technical term is 'leadering'.
>
> Does anyone know how to do it in OOW?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Jo
Hi Debianologists,
Many word processors can fill to the right margin
with a repeated character (often dot or underscore).
I think the technical term is 'leadering'.
Does anyone know how to do it in OOW?
Thanks
--
Joel Roth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
I want to thank all of you who replied to my question. As usual I got
many different viewpoints and as such have decided to install
LibreOffice & give it a go. As for those concerned about my implied
failure to do my own discovery...well that is exactly why I've been a
participating member of the D
LibreOffice all along: LibreOffice is derived from go-ooo, which was
the fork of OpenOffice.org that we were shipping.
> 2. Is OpenOffice still going to be supported?
Someone might see fit to package apache-ooo.org, but right now there is only
LibreOffice (formely go-ooo) in Debian.
Support fo
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:26:39 -0500, John W Foster wrote:
> 1. Why is Debian switching to LibreOffice, per the posting I saw a few
> days ago?
I suppose because is a community based development and supported upstream.
> 2. Is OpenOffice still going to be supported?
OpenOffice is dead
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:55:22PM +0200, Steven wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 13:26 -0500, John W Foster wrote:
[cut]
>
> > 3. What makes LibreOffice better than OpenOffice?
>
> It is supposed to be faster, has more bugs fixed, and so on. It also
> appears to m
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:26:39PM -0500, John W Foster wrote:
> 1. Why is Debian switching to LibreOffice, per the posting I saw a few
> days ago?
> 2. Is OpenOffice still going to be supported?
> 3. What makes LibreOffice better than OpenOffice?
>
> These questions are not i
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:26:39 -0500
John W Foster wrote:
> 1. Why is Debian switching to LibreOffice, per the posting I saw a few
> days ago?
> 2. Is OpenOffice still going to be supported?
> 3. What makes LibreOffice better than OpenOffice?
>
> These questions are not intende
Office, which has gained quite a number of new developers, cleaning
up the code. You should read up on why LibreOffice has forked from
OpenOffice. A short history can be found on wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibreOffice#History
But I'm sure others can give a much more detailed explan
2011/6/29 John W Foster :
> 1. Why is Debian switching to LibreOffice, per the posting I saw a few
> days ago?
Because the community has switched to LibreOffice.
> 2. Is OpenOffice still going to be supported?
Perhaps by Oracle, the Apache foundation, IBM or whomever may be
intereste
1. Why is Debian switching to LibreOffice, per the posting I saw a few
days ago?
2. Is OpenOffice still going to be supported?
3. What makes LibreOffice better than OpenOffice?
These questions are not intended to start a flame war! I have never even
looked at LibreOffice, as I did not need to
In <20110509130418.15f3f873.jhsu802...@jasonhsu.com>, Jason Hsu wrote:
>What happened to OpenOffice 2.4.1? Where can I get the *.deb file for it?
Lenny should still be available from most Debian mirrors. Even when it is
finally retired, it will be available in the archives. Finally, a
On Mon, 09 May 2011 13:04:18 -0500, Jason Hsu wrote:
> What happened to OpenOffice 2.4.1? Where can I get the *.deb file for
> it?
(...)
It's there:
http://packages.debian.org/lenny/openoffice.org
And also in the snapshot directory:
http://snapshot.debian.org/binary/openoffice.or
What happened to OpenOffice 2.4.1? Where can I get the *.deb file for it?
I know OpenOffice 2.4.1 is from Debian's Lenny branch, which is now oldstable.
However, version 2 of OpenOffice is substantially lighter than version 3.
I'm working on the creation of the new version (0.1.0
On Monday 25 April 2011 16:25:40 peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
> Definitely a sarcastic example; to accompany my remark
> about the computer being a sorcerer's apprentice for
> most users.
Sorry, Peter -
I always did take things too literally. The first French I learnt was "Vous
prenez les choses au
On Monday 25 April 2011 12:01:58 Camaleón wrote:
> Oh, well, if you put it that way... there is no need to make a document
> for that, just send an e-mail or upload a new twitter ;-)
Quite. Another poster in fact suggested email.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debia
Camaleon & Lisi,
From: Camaleon
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:01:58 + (UTC)
> I took the above just as a sarcastic example...
Definitely a sarcastic example; to accompany my remark
about the computer being a sorcerer's apprentice for
most users. At a social event such as an office party,
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:19:35 -0800, peasthope wrote:
> From: Camaleon
> Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:28:01 + (UTC)
>> What you are getting is a common/documented error, don't worry. To
>> solve it you have to edit the XML file and remove the line at the top
>> that links the XML with a stylesheet
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 23:10:10 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Sunday 24 April 2011 18:34:55 Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:28:29 +0100, Lisi wrote:
>> > On Sunday 24 April 2011 16:38:23 Camaleón wrote:
>> >> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:27:33 -0800, peasthope wrote:
>> >> > MS invented docx. Now when
From: Camaleon
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:28:01 + (UTC)
> What you are getting is a common/documented error, don't worry. To solve
> it you have to edit the XML file and remove the line at the top that
> links the XML with a stylesheet (XSL).
>
> For example:
>
>
>
> ...
>
> Just rem
On Sunday 24 April 2011 18:34:55 Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:28:29 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 April 2011 16:38:23 Camaleón wrote:
> >> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:27:33 -0800, peasthope wrote:
> >> > MS invented docx. Now when John Doe wants to say "Summer Vacation
> >> > Planning
On Sunday 24 April 2011 09:05:34 am peasth...@shaw.ca wrote:
> I get that. But the function of a browser is to interpret
> a text in an XML language, into a form for input to a human.
> I just don't see how to make Iceweasel recognize the structure
> of this document. The style is there but Ic
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:28:29 +0100, Lisi wrote:
> On Sunday 24 April 2011 16:38:23 Camaleón wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:27:33 -0800, peasthope wrote:
>> > MS invented docx. Now when John Doe wants to say "Summer Vacation
>> > Planning Meeting. Bring your coffee mug to the boardroom at 3:00.
On Sunday 24 April 2011 16:38:23 Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:27:33 -0800, peasthope wrote:
> > MS invented docx. Now when John Doe wants to say "Summer Vacation
> > Planning Meeting. Bring your coffee mug to the boardroom at 3:00." he
> > can send an archive containing a hierarchy of
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 09:05:34 -0800, peasthope wrote:
> From: Camaleon
> Subject: Re: docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice
>> No, indeed. To avoid that tell (instruct) "Mr. Doe" to deliver a PDF
>> document instead and problem solved ;-)
>
> Or
From: Camaleon
Subject:Re: docx; was Re^2: OTF conversion without OpenOffice
> No, indeed. To avoid that tell (instruct) "Mr. Doe" to deliver a PDF
> document instead and problem solved ;-)
Or send an email containing a message of about 82 ASCII characters.
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 08:27:33 -0800, peasthope wrote:
(Uf... a very old thread, I've completely forgotten the full context :-P)
> MS invented docx. Now when John Doe wants to say "Summer Vacation
> Planning Meeting. Bring your coffee mug to the boardroom at 3:00." he
> can send an archive contai
MS invented docx. Now when John Doe wants to say "Summer
Vacation Planning Meeting. Bring your coffee mug to the boardroom
at 3:00." he can send an archive containing a hierarchy of a
dozen or so files. Several kB in total.
* From: brownh
* Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 07:11:47 -0400
t; * umount the share
> * try to connect again
> * fine, gnome mounts the share without asking me the password again
> * try to open a text file from the share ... No problem, gedit opens the
> file
> * try to open an openoffice file and the pop up appears asking me the
> password
share/, it asks me the password ..
> >> Any ideas?
> >
> > Every time?
> >
> > Maybe is Seahorse, the password manager for GNOME but it should provide
> > options for storing the password (forget, remember for this
> > session...) :-?
> Its not gnome, the p
On Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:24:20 -0300, Ezequiel Larrarte wrote:
> Hi everyone, I ve reinstalled my computer with a fresh Debian squeeze
> and now openoffice quickstart doesn't let me reboot my PC. I be been
> reading that it's an openoffice bug, any news about this?
Do y
Hi everyone, I ve reinstalled my computer with a fresh Debian squeeze and
now openoffice quickstart doesn't let me reboot my PC. I be been reading
that it's an openoffice bug, any news about this?
Another strange thing is that everytime I open a document from the my samba
server using
On 16 Feb 2011, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 01:54:15PM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > I'm using Sid. After OpenOffice broke during an upgrade I purged it and
> > reinstalled, after which it returned to life as LibreOffice. There
>
> define &
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:02:58 -0800, John Jason Jordan wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:30:47 + (UTC) Camaleón dijo:
>
>>Back on topic, Wikipedia holds up-to-date info about OpenOffice forks
>>and its derivatives:
>>
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org#D
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 01:54:15PM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> I'm using Sid. After OpenOffice broke during an upgrade I purged it and
> reinstalled, after which it returned to life as LibreOffice. There
define "broke", please.
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 07:12:02PM EST, Brad Alexander wrote:
[..]
> Honestly, I saw the writing on the wall when Elom was named CEO of
> Nokia.
It's ‘Elop’.. easy mnemonics:. rhymes with cop, flop, mop, slop, etc.
cj
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
ch of Sun's open projects, but
they have been doing good as far as I have been able to tell (the latest ver.
of Virtual Box is awesome and yummy open source goodness...
I'm afraid you missed a lot of news last weeks/month. MySQL, Solaris,
OpenOffice (which now became to Oracle OpenOffi
On Feb 15, 2011 9:03 PM, "John Jason Jordan" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:30:47 + (UTC)
> Camaleón dijo:
>
> >Back on topic, Wikipedia holds up-to-date info about OpenOffice forks
> >and its derivatives:
> >
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 19:30:47 + (UTC)
Camaleón dijo:
>Back on topic, Wikipedia holds up-to-date info about OpenOffice forks
>and its derivatives:
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org#Derivative_software
Thanks. That was very helpful.
The only part I don't under
> I'm afraid you missed a lot of news last weeks/month. MySQL, Solaris,
> OpenOffice (which now became to Oracle OpenOffice)..
I heard a little bit about this briefly, but somehow missed the bit
about MySQL. What will happen with that?
--
Petrus Validus
petrus.vali...@gmail.co
I agree and heartily hope that this is the case. For me, Nokia maintained a
moderate level of annoyance by their wishy-washy level of support of their
devices. They had already pretty much deemed the N900 a dead platform within
a few months of its release.
Now, with them dropping the entire works,
On Tuesday 15 February 2011 17:08:18 Brad Alexander wrote:
> It's not so much Nokia taking it in a proprietary direction, the fears are
> more based on the fact that Nokia, now headed by an ex-MS exec, has come
> out and said that they are going with Windows phone 7 series 7 phone
> series... They
t 03:08:22PM CET,
> > Frank Lanitz said:
> > > I'm afraid you missed a lot of news last weeks/month. MySQL, Solaris,
> > > OpenOffice (which now became to Oracle OpenOffice)..
> >
> > And now are fears for Qt...
>
> Well, that has nothing to do with
Adrian Levi:
> On 16 February 2011 02:47, Jochen Schulz wrote:
>
>> I would be surprised to find something like this. The fork has purely
>> political reasons and as it is still quite young, it shouldn't have
>> deviated from OOo by much until now.
>
> LibreOffice includes the patchset that was
On 16 February 2011 02:47, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> I would be surprised to find something like this. The fork has purely
> political reasons and as it is still quite young, it shouldn't have
> deviated from OOo by much until now.
LibreOffice includes the patchset that was GO-OO that neither Sun o
On 16 February 2011 00:22, Erwan David wrote:
> And now are fears for Qt...
Qt has nothing to do with Oracle. Qt is Nokia previously Trolltech.
Qt is LGPL and proprietory for commercial use.
Adrian
--
24x7x365 != 24x7x52 Stupid or bad maths?
hm. I've lost a machine.. literally _lost_. it res
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:38:24 -0500, shawn wilson wrote:
> 1. last time i checked, there are some things that libraoffice needs a
> jre to run and it doesn't ship with one (i've seen it complain about it
> - runs fine without it, but...).
That was a "soft" requireme
1. last time i checked, there are some things that libraoffice needs a jre
to run and it doesn't ship with one (i've seen it complain about it - runs
fine without it, but...).
2. i highly doubt nokia is dropping qt since it is at the center of their n8
sdk.
3. 95% of virtualbox is open sourced anyw
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:59:53 +0100
"Hans-J. Ullrich" dijo:
>But of course, that is my point, other people might decide different.
>Also free decisions are freedom, too!
Well said.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2011 schrieb John Jason Jordan:
Hi Jason,
> I am still using OOo 3.2.1 but have been hearing about the LibreOffice
> fork for some time now. A couple weeks ago I even went to their
> website, but I was looking for feature comparisons and I couldn't find
> it anywhere. All
John Jason Jordan:
>
> Does anyone know of a place that has a fairly detailed but not too
> technical list of why one would want to use LibreOffice over OOo,
> disregarding the open source issues.
I would be surprised to find something like this. The fork has purely
political reasons and as it is
>> to tell (the latest ver. of Virtual Box is awesome and yummy open
>> source goodness...
>
>Did you miss all the news about the Java TCK and Apache, Hudson, etc.?
>OpenOffice development was stifled under both Sun and now Oracle.
>Contributing to it was insanely difficult,
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:54:15 +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> I'm using Sid. After OpenOffice broke during an upgrade I purged it and
> reinstalled, after which it returned to life as LibreOffice. There
> wasn't any warning about this transition; it just happened.
Good move IM
1 - 100 of 1183 matches
Mail list logo
