Re: How to creat private PGP key ?

On Sun,05.Jul.09, 11:31:17, a dehqan wrote: > In The Name Of God > > I'll be thankfull if you guide ; > How to creat private PGP key in debian 5 ? with which software ? You need gpg (should be installed). You might want to read: http://www.dewinter.com/gnupg_howto/english/

Re: How to creat private PGP key ?

dehqan> In The Name Of God I'll be thankfull if you guide ; How to dehqan> creat private PGP key in debian 5 ? With which software ? I wrote a guide that will show you how http://sunoano.name/ws/public_xhtml/debian_security.html#gpg pgpUkXTXTG16g.pgp Description: PGP signature

How to creat private PGP key ?

In The Name Of God I'll be thankfull if you guide ; How to creat private PGP key in debian 5 ? with which software ? Regards dehqan

pgp passphrase caching in gnome

I'm running Squeeze, and when I go to System->Preferences->Encryption and Keyrings->PGP Passphrases it tells me that there is no running agent. However, I'm also running keychain, and GPG-AGENT-INFO is certainly populated when running an xterm. How can I get GPG to see the ag

Re: [OT] Inline Evolution GPG/PGP Signing

In-line signing is deprecated, or what did you mean by your subject? Also you message appears quite strange in mutt :-/ On Sun,14.Jun.09, 18:45:09, Harry Rickards wrote: > Also, I'd love to get away from a GUI mail client altogether, but I need > to be able to view messages in a seperate frame.

Re: [OT] Inline Evolution GPG/PGP Signing

On Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Harry Rickards wrote: Is there a way to send PGP or GPG encrypted messages inline in Evolution? I mean so that instead of an attachment with the signature in, you have: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I managed to find a thread about it online at http

[OT] Inline Evolution GPG/PGP Signing

Is there a way to send PGP or GPG encrypted messages inline in Evolution? I mean so that instead of an attachment with the signature in, you have: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I managed to find a thread about it online at http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/evolution/2003-January

PGP Key Create greyed out

I am using lenny. I am trying to create a pgp key using Seahorse 2.22.3. However to my surprise, I have found that create button is greyed out. I did some googling, but no solution has come up. I request members to help me out. Thank U, @ Jaan. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ

Re: squirrelmail plus g/pgp plugin == ?

On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 1) Is anyone running squirrelmail *and* the g/pgp plugin successfully? >> 2) On debian stable? >> 3) With apache 1.3? > Anyone expects to get some help without providing some actual input?

Re: squirrelmail plus g/pgp plugin == ?

On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 01:06:53PM -0500, Eric d'Alibut wrote: > Is anyone running squirrelmail *and* the g/pgp plugin successfully? > > On debian stable? > > With apache 1.3? > > The thing can't encrypt, and it has stopped signing now. I know that > soun

Re: squirrelmail plus g/pgp plugin == ?

Eric d'Alibut wrote: Is anyone running squirrelmail *and* the g/pgp plugin successfully? On debian stable? With apache 1.3? The thing can't encrypt, and it has stopped signing now. I know that sounds weird and New Agey magical, but that's what happened! Any feedback would

squirrelmail plus g/pgp plugin == ?

Is anyone running squirrelmail *and* the g/pgp plugin successfully? On debian stable? With apache 1.3? The thing can't encrypt, and it has stopped signing now. I know that sounds weird and New Agey magical, but that's what happened! Any feedback would be appreciated. Best regard

Re: inline pgp not working in evolution (when using base64 encoding?)

Bob Cox wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ base64 -d email_inline_pgp_failes.txt | gpg -d > gpg: encrypted with ELG-E key, ID 5515B7F0 > gpg: decryption failed: secret key not available > > Presumably this is the sender's key - but where is the recipient's? > > Something is not quite right. But you alr

Re: inline pgp not working in evolution (when using base64 encoding?)

On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:18:17 +0200, subscriptions ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hi all, > > I use PGP at home and at work using Evolution 2.22.3.1 (both Debian > Lenny, appears identical setup). When clicking the email in Evolution at > work, it prompts for a passwor

inline pgp not working in evolution (when using base64 encoding?)

Hi all, I use PGP at home and at work using Evolution 2.22.3.1 (both Debian Lenny, appears identical setup). When clicking the email in Evolution at work, it prompts for a password. However at home, Evolution does not prompt for a password. The Evolution program at home *does* prompt for a

Re: Howto sign e-mail using PGP (Debian Lennyy Evolution2.22.3.1)?

On 09/29/2008 Alex Samad wrote: Hi, > doesn't exchange use smime I suppose exchange (a mta) doesn't use s/mime, and if it does, it should still not mangle a gpg signed message. Outlook (a mua) uses s/mime. (But there is a GPG plugin available for it.) The OP is using Evolution as mua and excha

Re: Howto sign e-mail using PGP (Debian Lennyy Evolution2.22.3.1)?

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 07:08:12PM +0200, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: > On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 18:57 +0200, Winfried Tilanus wrote: > > I can confirm that your key is uploaded correctly and that the signature > > verification fails. > Thanks for the confirmation. > > > > > > Can anyone give me a clue

Re: Howto sign e-mail using PGP (Debian Lennyy Evolution2.22.3.1)?

On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 18:57 +0200, Winfried Tilanus wrote: > I can confirm that your key is uploaded correctly and that the signature > verification fails. Thanks for the confirmation. > > > Can anyone give me a clue how to get this working ? > > Well, if the sig fails, there can be two cases: >

Re: Howto sign e-mail using PGP (Debian Lennyy Evolution2.22.3.1)?

On 09/29/2008 Joost Kraaijeveld wrote: Hi, > But whenever I send an email to *myself* (through a MS Exchange 2000 > server) using "PGP sign" Evolution says "Invalid signature". Mail from > other people seem to work correctly: in the end (after some clicking) I >

Re: Howto sign e-mail using PGP (Debian Lennyy Evolution2.22.3.1)?

the system, try > sending mail to yourself without the mail leaving the box, and see if > it works, or try using a free mail provider. Sending email through GMail, using the same PGP things I use for Evolution BUT USING Icedove/Enigmail works as expected. Viewing the send mail items does not h

Re: Howto sign e-mail using PGP (Debian Lennyy Evolution2.22.3.1)?

On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:09:24 +0200 "Joost Kraaijeveld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > But whenever I send an email to *myself* (through a MS Exchange 2000 > server) using "PGP sign" Evolution says "Invalid signature". Mail from > other people s

Howto sign e-mail using PGP (Debian Lennyy Evolution2.22.3.1)?

Hi, I am trying to find out how signing email works using Evolution on Debian Lenny. I created a PGP key, exported it to the key servers, where it arrived (at least that is what I suspect): e.g. gpg --recv-keys 673C3196 gpg: requesting key 673C3196 from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net gpg: key

Re: PGP Keys Expiration

s. keeling writes: > grave bugs of gnupg-doc... -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PGP Keys Expiration

John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > s. keeling writes: > > Spots is dead. What do I do now to update that to my present real-world > > situation, or do I even really have to? I've spent many hours on the > > manpage among others. > > Have you read the _GNU Privacy Handbook_ that is included in

Re: PGP Keys Expiration

s. keeling writes: > Spots is dead. What do I do now to update that to my present real-world > situation, or do I even really have to? I've spent many hours on the > manpage among others. Have you read the _GNU Privacy Handbook_ that is included in the gnupg-doc package? You probably don't want

Re: PGP Keys Expiration

On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 02:21:09AM +0200, s. keeling wrote: > John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > s. keeling writes: > > > Can we expand on that? I have my passphrase. I use the key all the > > > time. It's tied to my old, now defunct, ISP. You mean I can generate a > > > revocation key, then

Re: PGP Keys Expiration

John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > s. keeling writes: > > Can we expand on that? I have my passphrase. I use the key all the > > time. It's tied to my old, now defunct, ISP. You mean I can generate a > > revocation key, then generate a new, more accurately tied key? > > What do you mean by "

Re: PGP Keys Expiration

s. keeling writes: > Can we expand on that? I have my passphrase. I use the key all the > time. It's tied to my old, now defunct, ISP. You mean I can generate a > revocation key, then generate a new, more accurately tied key? What do you mean by "tied"? You can edit the key and add, delete or

Re: PGP Keys Expiration

Karl O. Pinc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 07/06/2008 08:36:13 AM, John W Foster wrote: > > I have over the years established several PGP public keys that are no > > longer valid due to expired e-mail addresses. I did not think at the > > time they were created that

Re: PGP Keys Expiration

On 07/06/2008 08:36:13 AM, John W Foster wrote: I have over the years established several PGP public keys that are no longer valid due to expired e-mail addresses. I did not think at the time they were created that I needed an expiration date in thm. FWIW, IIRC accepted best practice is to

PGP Keys Expiration

I have over the years established several PGP public keys that are no longer valid due to expired e-mail addresses. I did not think at the time they were created that I needed an expiration date in thm. Is there any way to gat rid of these from the PGP key server so that no one will try to use

Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/08/08 06:17, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:03:15AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >> God doesn't like Kiwis? > > Which god? FSM, of course! - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA "Kittens give Mo

Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)

Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 03:23:04PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 02:17:47 +1200 > > Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > The weird thing is, it works for other people. Googling on the radix64 > > > > Including me; I impor

Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)

On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 01:05:14PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:18:01 +1200 > Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Chris, > > > Are you running etch? > > No, Lenny here. GnuPG reports it's version 1.4.6. Version: 1.4.6-2 for me on etch. Although, it seems

Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)

apparent" You're a sidewalk cipher speaking prionic jive Give You Nothing - Bad Religion signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)

gpg: key 1880283C: removed multiple subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: removed multiple subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: invalid subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: invalid subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: invalid subkey binding gpg: key 1880283C: removed multiple subkey binding gpg: using PGP tr

Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 03:23:04PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 02:17:47 +1200 > Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Chris, > > > The weird thing is, it works for other people. Googling on the radix64 > > Including me; I imported all three of the keys you ment

Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)

t; gpg: key 1880283C: removed multiple subkey binding > gpg: key 1880283C: invalid subkey binding > gpg: key 1880283C: invalid subkey binding > gpg: key 1880283C: invalid subkey binding > gpg: key 1880283C: removed multiple subkey binding > gpg: using PGP trust model > gpg: key 188

Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)

Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > How does your DNS server resolve subkeys.pgp.net? I see five different Follow up to my last fup; no, maradns isn't the solution, sorry. Using the IPs works, DNS times out apparently. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advance

Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)

Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 02:17:47 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: > > [...] > > > Sorry to jump in mid thread, but since this issue has popped up I > > thought I'd mention a problem I've been having. > > > > $ gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 330C4

Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)

On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 02:17:47 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote: [...] > Sorry to jump in mid thread, but since this issue has popped up I > thought I'd mention a problem I've been having. > > $ gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 330C4A75 > gpg: requesting key 330C4A75 from hkp server sub

Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)

bout GPG & the servers to offer any constructive advice. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)radnever immediately apparent" When I say ugly, I don't mean rough looking, I mean hideous Ugly - The Stranglers signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/07/08 09:17, Chris Bannister wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 01:45:47PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:41:08 +0200 >> Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hello Jochen, >>

pgp import problem (was Re: [SOLVED] Re: Problems with Gnome appearance.)

On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 01:45:47PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:41:08 +0200 > Jochen Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Jochen, > > > $ gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 3710949B > > gpg: requesting key 3710949B from hkp server subkeys.pgp.net > > gpg: key

Re: Claws Mail not encrypting to self when using pgp-mime

On Sun, 25 May 2008 15:52:58 +0100 Ananda Samaddar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm having a problem with Claws Mail. Since the Claws Mail pgp > plugins were updated from 3.40-1 to 3.40-2, sent messages are not > being encrypted to self. This is even though I am enabling th

Claws Mail not encrypting to self when using pgp-mime

I'm having a problem with Claws Mail. Since the Claws Mail pgp plugins were updated from 3.40-1 to 3.40-2, sent messages are not being encrypted to self. This is even though I am enabling the option of adding myself to the recipients list for sent mail. I am using the PGP mime plugin

Re: pgp key servers (was Re: Suspend not working)

> > > >Or like yours? > > > > > > [application/pgp-signature (No public key to verify the signature)] > > Signature made at Sun 06 Apr 2008 04:47:48 PM EDT > > No public key to verify the signature > > Key fingerprint: B51408D89FF9A76D > &

pgp key servers (was Re: Suspend not working)

changed/adjusted for suspend to work. I am running the stock 686 > > > kernel, and very average hardware on an Intel MB. > > > > Sorry I can't help with your suspend problem. > > > > I've been subscribed to this list for a few weeks and in th

Re: debian multimedia pgp key

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:53:48PM -0600, Jude DaShiell wrote: > I think the location changed for the multimedia gpg key. Just install the debian-multimedia-keyring package. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) signature.asc

debian multimedia pgp key

I think the location changed for the multimedia gpg key. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Where to get debian iso public pgp key?

Pat wrote: >Hello, > I have downloaded the md5sums file for the iso images and gpg gives me: > gpg: Signature made Sat 07 Apr 2007 09:17:29 PM CDT using DSA key ID >88C7C1F7 >gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found > >Where do I find this key for verification? It i

Where to get debian iso public pgp key?

Hello, I have downloaded the md5sums file for the iso images and gpg gives me: gpg: Signature made Sat 07 Apr 2007 09:17:29 PM CDT using DSA key ID 88C7C1F7 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found Where do I find this key for verification? It is not on https://db.debian.org/ or http://k

Re: Getting Firefox/Iceweasel to open text/pgp files?

Hi, Kevin. On Aug 01 2007, Kevin Mark wrote: > I subscribe to debian-devel-changes. Is that not useful? Yes, that is good, but not exactly a solution to what I had in mind. Regards, Rogério. -- Rogério Brito : [EMAIL PROTECTED],ime.usp}.br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8 http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrit

Re: [Semi-solved] Re: Getting Firefox/Iceweasel to open text/pgp files?

Hi, Tong. On Aug 03 2007, - Tong - wrote: > I've tried to find such thing everywhere but all failed. Please share > the url that you found. Here is the url: http://www.spasche.net/mozilla/ Hope this helps, Rogério. -- Rogério Brito : [EMAIL PROTECTED],ime.usp}.br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8 http

Re: [Semi-solved] Re: Getting Firefox/Iceweasel to open text/pgp files?

ilcap hack? Sure. Here it is: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat .mailcap text/pgp; /usr/bin/iceweasel '%s' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I guess that this just shows that I'm not that good with

Re: [Semi-solved] Re: Getting Firefox/Iceweasel to open text/pgp files?

On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:38:36 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: > that's a semi-solution to the problem, but I could find an > extension to the browser somewhere with Google that makes it open things > with the browser I've tried to find such thing everywhere but all failed. Please share the url that yo

Re: Getting Firefox/Iceweasel to open text/pgp files?

Not an answer to your question, but an alternative: aptitude changelog -- Regards, Jörg-Volker. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Semi-solved] Re: Getting Firefox/Iceweasel to open text/pgp files?

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:38:36PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: > Hi, Andrew. > > On Aug 01 2007, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:55:58PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: > > > So, in light of this would anybody know how to force Firefox (etc) to > > > open the files instead

Re: Getting Firefox/Iceweasel to open text/pgp files?

iles) opening in the browser without any > problems up to a point where (I think) the ftpmasters changed the > description for the web browsers that the .changes files content is > text/pgp, instead of text/plain. > > So, in light of this would anybody know how to force Firefox (etc) t

[Semi-solved] Re: Getting Firefox/Iceweasel to open text/pgp files?

Hi, Andrew. On Aug 01 2007, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:55:58PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: > > So, in light of this would anybody know how to force Firefox (etc) to > > open the files instead of trying to launch, say, less for such files? > > I'm sure there is a 'pr

Getting Firefox/Iceweasel to open text/pgp files?

the web browsers that the .changes files content is text/pgp, instead of text/plain. So, in light of this would anybody know how to force Firefox (etc) to open the files instead of trying to launch, say, less for such files? Any help here would be quite welcome. Thanks, Rogério Brito. -- Rogério

Re: Getting Firefox/Iceweasel to open text/pgp files?

iles) opening in the browser without any > problems up to a point where (I think) the ftpmasters changed the > description for the web browsers that the .changes files content is > text/pgp, instead of text/plain. > > So, in light of this would anybody know how to force Firefox (etc) t

Re: PGP Key after new install

On 4/17/07, Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How do I go about retaining my GPG/PGP key after a reinstall of Debian? I used to have it so that my GPG key would automatically ask me to sign when replying to any email, but now I don't have my GPG key anymore. Should I gen

PGP Key after new install

How do I go about retaining my GPG/PGP key after a reinstall of Debian? I used to have it so that my GPG key would automatically ask me to sign when replying to any email, but now I don't have my GPG key anymore. Should I generate a new key, or should I use the old one? How would I go

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/30/07 18:03, Paul Johnson wrote: > Greg Folkert wrote: >> On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 07:48 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: >>> On 01/29/07 22:01, s. keeling wrote: >>>> Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [snip] > Ther

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

ifference from (pgp.mit.edu and keys.pgp.com) to subkeys.pgp.net AFAIK subkeys.pgp.net is a rotation to different servers, so there's no guarantee you'll continue to get no delays. In fact my attempts to refresh keys almost always time out and I'm using subkeys.pgp.net. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://therning.org/magnus pgpnuZYrfnQQC.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

Greg Folkert wrote: > On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 07:48 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 01/29/07 22:01, s. keeling wrote: >> > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Has anyone noti

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 01/29/07 22:01, s. keeling wrote: > > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that > >> are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding > >> terribly, horrifically sl

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

Greg Folkert wrote: > I have Comcastic! Meh... crappy. I only get 1100KB/sec from kernel.org > and giganews.com. Is that a typo? 1100KBps = 1.1MBps = 8.8Mbps For 9Mbps I'll put up with almost anything---after all, a T1 is only 1.544 Mbps. On AT&T [A]DSL, I generally get 130KBps = 1.04Mbp

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 07:48 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/29/07 22:01, s. keeling wrote: > > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that >

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/29/07 22:01, s. keeling wrote: > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that >> are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding >&

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greg Folkert wrote: >> Who's your provider? > > Formerly pgp.mit.edu and keys.pgp.com > > Now subkeys.pgp.net. > > I now am getting no delays since the change. I don't understand the > difference f

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 04:01 +, s. keeling wrote: > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that > > are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding > > terribly, horrifically slow. If they respond at

Re: PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that > are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding > terribly, horrifically slow. If they respond at all, timing out is > becoming more and more frequent. Nope:

PGP Keyservers being glacially slow, lately

Has anyone noticed that as of about 3 weeks ago, that keyservers that are typically used (MITs and the other usual candidates) are responding terribly, horrifically slow. If they respond at all, timing out is becoming more and more frequent. Even many web-interfaces timeout regularly. I'd like to

Re: PGP Keys on packages

On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 05:50:49 -0500 Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a little tired of all these messages on PGP keys missing or not missing > for > packages. > > How do I get the ones that are missing? > or > How do I make the messages go away and r

PGP Keys on packages

I'm a little tired of all these messages on PGP keys missing or not missing for packages. How do I get the ones that are missing? or How do I make the messages go away and revert to the pre-secure approach? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "u

Re: Apt-move and pgp signing

Simo Kauppi wrote: > I understand. I think the idea in those instructions is that afterwards > you have two secret keyrings. One with your passphrase in it (in .gnupg > directory) and one without the passphrase (the secring.auto file), which > seems to me very unsecure! So you should somehow tell g

Re: Apt-move and pgp signing

not possible). > Gpg is complicated; the instructions are lengthy and unclear, the FAQ > creates more questions. An ugly mess. If I find the solution it will be > by accident and I will not trust it. :) I agree. Like I said, I haven't used apt-move so I don't necessarily understa

Re: Apt-move and pgp signing

Simo Kauppi wrote: > James Vahn wrote: >> # Set this to key name to be used for signing Release files. >> SIGNINGKEY= >> >> What is it wanting me to put there? > > Hi, > > I haven't used apt-move, but from the gpg point of view the name is > either the

Re: Apt-move and pgp signing

On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 12:28:04PM -0700, James Vahn wrote: > I read with interest about dfsbuild and would like to try it, but it > wants a Packages.pgp file from my local mirror. Setting apt-move and > gpg up for this is proving to be difficult. > > short:~# gpg -K > /root/.gnupg

Re: Apt-move and pgp signing

On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you installed GnuPG package? Sure, but apparently have something skewed. I don't know what a "key name" means. A name, number, id, ..what? It's not very clear. > short:~# gpg -K > /root/.gnupg/secring.gpg > --

Apt-move and pgp signing

I read with interest about dfsbuild and would like to try it, but it wants a Packages.pgp file from my local mirror. Setting apt-move and gpg up for this is proving to be difficult. short:~# gpg -K /root/.gnupg/secring.gpg sec 1024D/C633A

PGP signing (was: First general purpose unmoderated newsgroup for Debian)

tly obvious to anyone of average intelligence, I have doubts regarding your motive for telling Paul to "turn off this pgp crap". -- Alex Nordstrom http://lx.n3.net/ Please do not CC me in followups; I am subscribed to debian-user. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

pgp signature attachements w/ cryptplug

Hi! I'm using kmail + cryptplug from the Aegypten project, and it works fine, *but* it attaches the signatures with 'signature' file name. It has no extension like some other emails, which have an atached signature.asc file. Does anybody know, howto costumize the signature filename in kmail, o

Re: Inline PGP signatures [was: Re: email signatures]

on Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:53:02PM +0100, Joerg Johannes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Am Fr, den 26.03.2004 schrieb Derrick 'dman' Hudson um 15:46: > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:59:24AM +0100, Joerg Johannes wrote: > > > > | > Not when using inline PGP sign

Re: Inline PGP signatures

n't | > make them think.) | | The only solution I know of is to configure your client to use | recipient-specific signing methods, which is what I've done with Gnus. | Email groups are signed by PGP/MIME, Usenet groups get signed inline, and | certain users get inline or no signatures,

Re: Inline PGP signatures

etchmail and all that stuff. | > | > Well, obviously that claim isn't true if it can't handle PGP/MIME properly. | | OK, you're right. So "s/good thing/idea/" should be applied to what I | said above ;) Yeah, the good thing about using maildrop, etc., is the ability

Re: Inline PGP signatures

t; Actually, my original Gnus setup instructions to you included the per-group >> configuration method. As for the per-user changes: it seems that I >> abandoned that setup a long time ago and had forgotten about it. There are >> so relatively few people in my address book that c

Re: Inline PGP signatures

On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 21:38, Kirk Strauser wrote: > Check out http://my.gnus.org/ - it's chock full of tutorials and > walkthroughs. Best of luck to you! I'll give it a try, thanks! -- Cheers, Trey --- "Men do not differ much about what things they will call evils; they differ enormously abou

Re: Inline PGP signatures

-- Kirk Strauser pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Inline PGP signatures

er-group > configuration method. As for the per-user changes: it seems that I > abandoned that setup a long time ago and had forgotten about it. There are > so relatively few people in my address book that can't receive PGP mails > that I gave each of them their own group, and se

Re: Inline PGP signatures

:-) -- Pigeon Be kind to pigeons Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21C61F7F pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Inline PGP signatures

John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Richard Hoskins writes: >> But you're setting up the machine, right? A send/receive clone is a four >> line bash script started by clicking a purty icon on the desktop. > > What does the "Send/Receive" button do that gpppon doesn't? I don't know what gpp

Re: Inline PGP signatures [was: Re: email signatures]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 28 March 2004 12:21 pm, Werner Mahr wrote: > Am Samstag, 27. MÃrz 2004 21:19 schrieb Brad Sims: > > On Saturday 27 March 2004 6:06 am, Werner Mahr wrote: > > > Do I need both lines, or is one for Woody and one for Sarge

Re: Inline PGP signatures

David writes: > If you have things configured to be sent immediately, your mail client > could be dialing everytime you send a mail, and if you are an active > participant on a list like this, your phone bill could send you to the > poor house. Not when local calls are unmetered, as the are in mos

Re: Inline PGP signatures

John Hasler wrote: Paul Johnson writes: No, however, you really are a fool if you take the net too personally. What is personal about asking if your statement was meant as a criticism of PPP? I don't think Paul meant it that way. If you are on dial-up, it can be a lot more economic to s

Re: Inline PGP signatures

Richard Hoskins writes: > But you're setting up the machine, right? A send/receive clone is a four > line bash script started by clicking a purty icon on the desktop. What does the "Send/Receive" button do that gpppon doesn't? -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elm

Re: Inline PGP signatures

Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can cope :-), by connecting/disconnecting manually. But for the > Windoze convertee, the requirement is for a clone of OE's > "Send/Receive" button. But you're setting up the machine, right? A send/receive clone is a four line bash script started by clickin

Re: Inline PGP signatures

''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : `. `'` proud Debian admin and user `- Debian. Because it *must* work. debian.org aboutdebian.com pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >